+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Using Neutrons to Diagnose Kinetic Phenomena in ... · W. Kabadi, L. Milanese, F. Seguin UCSD...

Using Neutrons to Diagnose Kinetic Phenomena in ... · W. Kabadi, L. Milanese, F. Seguin UCSD...

Date post: 06-May-2018
Category:
Upload: buiminh
View: 217 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
22
LLNL-PRES-687440 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Using Neutrons to Diagnose Kinetic Phenomena in Interpenetrating Flows Drew P. Higginson, S. C. Wilks, A. Link, R. Hatarik, S. V. Weber, D. Ryutov, S. Ross, H.-S. Park (LLNL), F. Fiuza (SLAC), A. Zylstra (LANL), C. K. Li, H.Sio (MIT) Kinetic Physics Workshop 5 – 7 April 2016
Transcript

LLNL-PRES-687440This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Using Neutrons to Diagnose Kinetic Phenomena in Interpenetrating FlowsDrewP.Higginson,S.C.Wilks,A.Link,R.Hatarik,S.V.Weber,D.Ryutov,S.Ross,H.-S.Park(LLNL),F.Fiuza (SLAC),A.Zylstra (LANL),C.K.Li,H.Sio (MIT)

KineticPhysicsWorkshop5– 7April2016

2LLNL-PRES-687440

ACSELcollaboration(AstrophysicalCollisionless ShockExperimentswithLasers)

LLNL (USA): H.-S. Park, J. S. Ross, D. Casey, D. P. Higginson, C. Huntington, B. Remington, H. Rinderknecht,D. Ryutov, S. Weber, D. Turnbull, B. Pollack, S. Wilks

Osaka U. (Japan): Y. Sakawa, H. TakabeKyushu U (Japan): T. MoritaOxford U (UK): G. Gregori, J. Meineke, M. LevyPrinceton U (USA): A. Spitkovsky, D. Caprioli, J. ParkSLAC (USA): F. FiuzaLLE (USA): D. Froula, G. Fiskel, P.-Y. ChangU. Of Chicago: D. Lamb, P. TzeferacosRice U. (USA): E. LiangYork U (UK): N. Woosley, R. CrowstonU. Of Mich (USA): P. Drake, C. Kuranz, W. WanLULI (France): M. KoenigMIT (USA): C. Li, R. Petrasso, H. Sio, B.Lahmann, G. Sutcliffe, M. Gatu-Johnson,

W. Kabadi, L. Milanese, F. SeguinUCSD (USA): F. Beg, C. KraulandLANL (USA): A. Zylstra

3LLNL-PRES-687440

GoalistoStudyAstrophysically RelevantCollisionless Shocks

[1] Huntington et al., Nat. Physics, 11, 215 (2015)[2] Kato et al., ApJ, 681, L93, 2008

[1]

Weibel mediated density filaments

shock[2]

§ Collisionless shocksinastrophysicalphenomena(e.g.SNR)arethoughttoacceleratehighestenergy(1019 eV)cosmicrays.

§ ExperimentsatOmega:longWeibel filamentsbutnotenoughtime/density/spacetogrowintoashock.

§ ExperimentsatNIF:higherdensity,largervolume,longertimes.Canwedriveacollisionless shockatNIF?

§ Also,agreatplatformtoinvestigatekineticandmulti-fluidphenomena.

4LLNL-PRES-687440

1.E+08

1.E+09

1.E+10

1.E+11

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Neu

tron

Yie

ld

Separation Distance [mm]

NeutronYieldRatiosSuggestaMildlyCollisionalRegime

Two types of target (CD/CD & CD/CH)Different Separations (6 – 10 mm) CD/CD

CD/CH

CD alone

§ YieldratioofCD/CD:CD/CH onNIFgivesinsightintocollisionality.

§ A)Ratioof2-4xsuggestsstagnationandshock.B)Ratioof‘infinity’(CD/CH=0)suggestsnointeraction(i.e.“collision-less”).

§ Weareinaregimeofmoderatecollisionality betweenbeam.Thuswerequirecollisional,kineticmodeling.

8x

12-16xCD CD

CD/CD CD/CH

250 kJ

CD CH

6 – 10 mm 6 – 10 mm

5LLNL-PRES-687440

PlasmaParametersSuggestFlowisSemi-collisionlessBeam-BeamandCollisionalWithinaBeam

6 mm 10 mmne 3. 1020 6. 1019 cm-3 / flownC/D/H 4. 1019 9. 1018 cm-3 / flowv 1000 1000 km/sλC-C 1.6 3.4 mmτC-C 1.6 3.4 nsTi 1 0.4 keVvth,D 220 140 km/svth,C 90 60 km/sτii 8 8 psλii 1 0.5 µm

Beam

-Bea

mIn

tra-B

eam

Plasma Flow Parameters

�bb ⇠✓A

Z

◆2 �v4

Zne

�th = vth⌧th

§ Themfp forbeam-beamcollisionsisclosetothesystemsize.Timescalesaresimilartotheobservedneutronduration(1-3ns).

§ Wecanvarythecollisionalitybychangingtheseparationofthefoilstochange(ni).

§ Withinthebeamstheionsarecollisionalwithverylowmfp.

6LLNL-PRES-687440

ModelLaserwithHydraandHandofftoPICforInterpenetration

Step 1: Single foil with 2D HYDRA

ElectronDensity

Step 2: Opposing foils with LSP

From S. Weber

250kJperfoilfor5ns,at3.5ns

Takethisflow,andsenditbackagainstitself.Symmetrizespherically.

UseLSP(PIC)tomodelinterpenetrationandhasneutronpackage.*NoEMfieldsused.

* A. Link

∆x = 20 – 100 µm∆t = 0.2 ps1600 part./species/cell

7LLNL-PRES-687440

Interpenetrationoftheflows

D H

Pz � P✓

Pz + P✓

Pz = 12mini

�v2 + v2rms

neutron production C C

8LLNL-PRES-687440

NeutronsProbeBeforeThermalization isCompleted

9LLNL-PRES-687440

Beam-Beam(CD/CD)NeutronsProbeEvenEarlier

10LLNL-PRES-687440

SyntheticnTOFs AgreewithDataandShowDopplerShift

Sim

Sim Norm.

Exp.

6 mm

CD CH 5o

139o 97o

CD/CH 6 mm § SimulatedNeutronsarerunpassedthroughthe(time/energy)diagnosticresponse.

§ Reasonableagreementwithwidthandshift.Thoughnotwithyield.

§ ADopplerisobservedintheforwardandbackwarddirections.

2.45 MeV+tbang

11LLNL-PRES-687440

IntheSymmetricCD/CDCaseUpshiftisObserved

6 mm

CD CD 5o

139o 97o

CD/CD 6 mm § Again,goodagreementwithexperiment.

§ Allanglesseemtobeupshiftedinenergy.

§ Thewidthsofthedistributionsvarywithanglewiththelargestwidthat90°.

2.45 MeV+ tbang

12LLNL-PRES-687440

NeutronVelocityShiftMirrorsTargetAssymetries

Sim

Exp. § Weobserveanangledependentshiftinneutronenergyintheasymmetriccase.

§ Weobserveaisotropicenergyboostinthethesymmetriccase.

§ Thedatafitscomefromshifted-Gaussianthatisdependentonthebangtime*.Errorbarsmaybeslightlyoverconservative.

SimExp.

*from R. Hatarik

13LLNL-PRES-687440

NeutronKinematics

vr = |v1|+ |v2|v1 v2

vc.m. =12 (|v1|� |v2|)

v0 = 21.65 Mm/s (2.4495 MeV)

DD

n vn

Head-on DD Reaction

vn ' v0 +0.748

v0v2r + vcm cos ✓ � 1

v0v2cm sin

2 ✓

§ Theneutronenergy(i.e.velocity)isdependenton:

1) TheQ-valueofthereaction(v0).

2) AnangularlydependentDopplershift,whichislinearlydependentoncenter-of-massvelocity.

3) Anisotopicboostofenergyfromtherelativevelocityoftheinteraction.

14LLNL-PRES-687440

DeuteronVelocityRecoveredfromNeutronEnergyShift

Sim

Exp.

1250 km/s

1000 km/s

750 km/s

750 km/s 500 km/s

250 km/s

§ FittingtheneutronshiftswiththeoreticalvaluesallowsflowvelocitytobeinferredforCD/CHandCD/CD!

§ Inferreddeuteronvelocitiesareweightedtotheneutronemissionandthusdifferwiththetarget.

CD/CD neutron Peak

CD/CH neutron Peak

v2 = 0

v2 = v1

15LLNL-PRES-687440

TheSimulationsSeemtoReproducetheNuclearData

Oursimulationsagreewith:

§ Neutrontimehistory(i.e.bangtimeandburn-width).

§ Shape(comparedwithimagesofprotonself-emission).

§ Brysk or“Apparent”iontemperatures.Seemstobeamesurement ofradialexpansion.

§ Velocityshifts

But…

16LLNL-PRES-687440

YetwestillfindaNeutronYieldDeficiency

1.E+08

1.E+09

1.E+10

1.E+11

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Neu

tron

Yie

ld

Separation Distance [mm]

§ MatchtoCD/CDyieldisfairlygoodespeciallyattheclosestseparations.

§ CD/CHyieldisunder-predictedby3–12timesandgetsworsewithdistance.

§ Thissuggeststhatwearemissingsometypeof“scattering”astheplasmabecomeslesscollisional.

§ Thiscouldbeduetocollision-less(i.e.electro-magnetic)effectsbecomingimportant.

CD/CD

CD/CH

CD alone

Simulations

17LLNL-PRES-687440

Summary

§ Wehaveinvestigatedtheinterpenetrationofflowsandexaminedthetransitionfromfewcollisionsintostagnation.

§ Neutrondiagnosticsarefoundtobeanexcellentwindowintotheinitialstagnationwhenkineticeffectsshouldbemostimportant.Couldbeusedasadopant.

§ Shiftsintheneutronmean-energyareidentifiedasameasurementofthevelocityoftheflowthatisweightedbytheproductionprobability.

§ Thereisstillsomethingmissinginourmodelsthatmustbeincludedtoreproducethemysteriesofourexperiments.

19LLNL-PRES-687440

Shapeofneutronself-emissionissimilartoexperimentalprotonimages

Bothimagesare“pancaked”withsimilardimensionsThisisfurtherevidencethatmodelingisdoingadecentjobofcapturingtheessentialphysics.

Spatialextentoftheregionwherefusionisoccurring.

Courtesy A. Zylstra

Simulated“neutronimage”“Y”:fwhm =1.2mm

“x”:fwhm

=3.2mm

Experimental“protonimage”

CD CD

D+D® 3He + n (2.45 MeV)D+D® T + p (3.0 MeV)

20LLNL-PRES-687440

NIFexperiments

Severaldiagnosticswerefielded,butwe’llfocusonneutronTime-Of-Flight(nTOF)

Two different types of target

Target for NIF N141022 shot

5o

95o

140o

CD

CD or CH

21LLNL-PRES-687440

Whataboutthemeanenergy?

CleardependenceofneutronenergyonanglewasobservedinthesimulationsfortheCDàß CHcase.Wasthispresentinexperimentalneutrondata?

SimulationspredictedverydifferentmeanenergiesfortheCDàß CHcasethatshouldalsobepresentintheexperiment.

Neutron Energy (MeV)Neutron Energy (MeV)

CDàßCD CDàßCH

< 𝑬𝒏 >< 𝑬𝒏 >

< 𝐸& >=12𝑚& 𝑣&- + 𝑣/012𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃

7

22LLNL-PRES-687440

Plannedexperimentswillreachthecollisionless regime

6 mm 10 mm 20 mm

Astheseparationdistanceincreases,wewillapproachacompletelycollisionless regime,andalsokeepthedensityhighenoughsothattherewillenoughc/𝜔9: ‘stoseecollisionlessshockformation.

Deuteron phase space for CD <à CD case for 3 separation distances

FutureNIFexperimentswillprobeintolesscollisionalregimes


Recommended