Date post: | 10-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | cameron-craddock |
View: | 30 times |
Download: | 1 times |
PowerPoint Presentation
DisclosuresI have no relevant financial relationships or off-label usages.
Using RealTimefMRI Based Neurofeedback To Probe Default Network Regulation
R. Cameron Craddock, PhDDirector of Imaging, Child Mind InstituteDirector, Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Nathan Kline Institute
October 29, 2015
3
Default Network
Task based deactivationBuckner et al. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1124: 1-38 (2008).
Default Network Connectivity
Greicius et. al. 2007 Biol. Psychiatry
DN Dysregulation
Sheline et. al. 2009 PNAS
ICN Competition
Fox MD PNAS 2005
7
RT Neurofeedback of DMNTest hypothesis of DMN dysregulation in depression, ADHD, aging, etc
Exp. Design
Class Training Labels
Training run
Time-LabeledScans
Image Recon and SVM Classification
Image Data
Data AcquisitionStimulus Presentation
StimulusConventional FMRI
Test Data Classifier OutputTesting Run
Real-Time Tracking RSNsLaConte, et al. (2007) Hum Brain Mapp. 28: 1033-1044Stephen LaConte August 19, 2009
Stimulus seen by volunteerUpdated fMRI resultsMotion tracking and correctionIntensity (brightness) of a single voxel, changing during stimulus conditionsController interface for display parameters
DMN Modulation Task
Modulating the DMN
Subject Performance (all subjects)No significant difference in scan order or fb vs. no fb in performance (DMN correlation with model)
fMRI Univariate Results (Focus > Wander)
Feedback OnFeedback Off
FeedbackNo FeedbackCorrelating Task Performance with Focus versus Wander fMRI Betas(All fMRI results are p noFB AI FC
Subject FB Performance correlates with RRS-Reflection ScoresDEM1-AgeDEM2-SexWhen running with the No Feedback condition results become non-significant p>0.05
RRS-Reflection scores correlate with Feedback activations
Difference between FB Conditions in AI correlates with AIM Affectivity MeasuresPositive Affectivity (z = -3.337)Negative Affectivity (z=2.394)
No significance if just looking at noFB and only slightly significant (p=0.035) for Pos Affectivity for FB only. Significance is in the difference between conditions
RT fMRI Neurofeedback for Children
RT-fMRI Motion Training
All data is currently being shared through INDIhttp://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/
AcknowledgmentsChild Mind InstituteMichael Milham, MD, PhDZarrar Shehzad
Nathan Kline InstituteAmalia McDonaldStan Colcombe, PhDBennett Leventhal, MD
NYU Child Study CenterAdriana DiMartino, MDF. Xavier Castellanos, MDVTCRIStephen LaConte, PhDPearl Chiu, PhDJonathan Lisinski, MS
Emory UniversityHelen Mayberg, MDThis work is funded by: A NARSAD Young Investigator Award and NIMH R01MH101555