Using the IDEA SystemResults from our Spring 2010 Pilot

Spring 2010 Pilot All on line, all used diagnostic form 5 faculty 9 courses 44% average response rate Results (2 faculty hard copies) sent to Beth

Pellicciotti and were sent confidentially to faculty via campus mail, an institutional group report was also sent (no names, just aggregate data)

Faculty Side Fill out faculty information form “FIF” sent as a

link (demographics and choose 3-5 essential objectives out of 12)

Sent back a link that you cut and paste into blackboard

Students are also sent link via Purdue email Students click on link, fill it out If they don’t, they keep on getting emails till they

do

Technology Side Heather Zamojski was our technology person

and has been involved in prior pilots Easy to use with our present technology All involved with the pilot recommend its use

Report Overview Page 1 – Big Picture

How did I do?

Page 3 – Diagnostic What can I do differently?

Page 2 – Learning Details What did students learn?

Page 4 – Statistical Detail Any additional

insights?

Page 1

Adjusted Scores versus RawAdjusted score- faculty isn’t penalized for students that aren’t motivated, hard courses and large courses. Adjusted takes in 5 variables Student Work Habits (#43) Student Motivation (#39) Class Size (Enrollment, FIF) Student Effort (multiple

items) Course Difficulty (multiple

items)

Raw, all data is unadjusted

Page 1: The Big Picture

4.5+4.54.4+4.44.2+4.2+3.2

7

Page 2: Progress on Relevant Objectives

Page 3: What might I do differently?

Page 4: Additional Reflection - Statistical Detail

Resources

Knowledge Center: www.theideacenter.org POD-IDEA Center NotesPOD-IDEA Center Learning NotesIDEA Papers