+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: allen-wheeler
View: 22 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp. February 22, 2006. Performance Comparisons. Benchmarking requires:. ePerformance PA Consulting Within PacifiCorp IEEE Distribution Reliability Other benchmarks. Identifying how data is derived Comparing types of systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
25
1 D I S T R I B U T I O N P A C I F I C O R P Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp February 22, 2006
Transcript
Page 1: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

1 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Utah Service Quality Review GroupBenchmarking at PacifiCorp

February 22, 2006

Page 2: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

2 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Performance Comparisons

ePerformancePA ConsultingWithin PacifiCorp IEEE Distribution ReliabilityOther benchmarks

Benchmarking requires:

Identifying how data is derived

Comparing types of systemsLooking for other explanatory

variablesDetermining differences in

practices that may lead to different results

Identifying opportunities for utilizing other practices to improve performance

Page 3: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

System CharacteristicsePerformance

Page 4: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

4 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

System Characteristics

System Rural vs. Non-Rural

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Per

cent

(%

)

Rural Non-Rural

Customers per Circuit / Feeder

735.2 751.5

714.4752.4

515545575605635665695725755785815845875

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Cu

sto

mer

s / C

ircu

it -

Fee

der

Average System Utilization

95%

58%69%

36%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Per

cen

tag

e (%

)

Page 5: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

5 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

System Characteristics, cont’d.O/H and U/G Outages per Circuit / Feeder

11.46

13.8412.76

7.70

-123456789

101112131415

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Ou

tag

es /

Cir

cuit

-Fee

der

O/H and U/G Outages/100 Route Miles

57.65

39.92

45.86 45.91

323436384042444648505254565860

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp OthersOu

tag

es p

er 1

00 R

ou

te M

iles

O/H and U/G Outages per 1000 Customer

17.36

9.80

16.0418.39

-2468

101214161820

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Ou

tag

es /

1000

Cu

sto

mer

s

Page 6: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

6 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Outage Metrics

CAIDI (Duration)

100

121

108

84

59

69

79

89

99

109

119

129

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Min

ute

s / C

ust

om

er

SAIFI (Frequency)

1.32

1.90

1.02

2.60

-0.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.802.002.202.402.602.80

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Inte

rru

pti

on

s p

er Y

ear

per

C

ust

om

er

SAIDI (CAIDI x SAIFI)

205

85

260

160

020406080

100120140160180200220240260280300

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Min

ute

s / C

ust

om

er

MAIFI

0.50

2.09

0.29

0.62

-0.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.802.002.202.40

Utah All PC exceptUtah

Pacif iCorp Peer Group

Inte

rru

pti

on

s / C

ust

om

er

Page 7: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

7 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Merger Commitment Targets & Results

PacifiCorp States SAIDI Baselines & Targets

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

FY 1

995-

1999

Bas

elin

e

Upl

ifted

Bas

elin

e

Mer

ger T

arge

t

FY04

Act

ual

FY05

Act

ual

Underlying Extreme Events Excluding Approved Major Events

ID OR UT WA WY

89

241

217

104113

240

211

243

113

204

185

153

186

149

217

249

150

138 126

186

CA

178

277

147

191

247

118

67

168172

124

Page 8: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

PA ConsultingBenchmarking Results

Page 9: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

9 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Entergy Services

TXU ED

CenterPoint

Exelon-ComEd

BG&E

DTE

Exelon-PECO PSE&G

EPCOR

WE EnergiesNWE-SD

SCE

PA Consulting – T&D Benchmarking Study 2005 (for Calendar 2004) Participants

KCPL

HydroOne

NWE-MT

Hydro Quebec

InternationalEskom

LG&E

BC Hydro

PHIPHI-PEPCO PHI-DelmarvaPHI-Altantic

Altalink

METC

ITC

OPPD

XCEL-MN (2)

XCEL-CO (2)

PacificorpNYSEG

Westar

RG&EATC

El Paso

NWE

IPL

Page 10: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

10 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

PA Benchmarking Characteristics

PA Benchmarking Characteristics

Distribution Line

Characteristic: N= Median PacifiCorp Utah

Distribution Customer/Square Mile 35 86 11.8 19.9

kWH Transmitted /Total Customers 38 29,571 34,434 35,771

New Distribution Line Growth Rate 20 1.63% 1.60% 1.04%

% Commercial and Industrial Customers 34 11.70% 14.40% 11.14%

% Underground Distribution Circuit Miles 29 26.90% 24.68% 38%

Trees/Overhead Pole Mile 16 106 156 98

Trees/Overhead Distribution Circuit Mile 22 101 119 81

Average Wage Rate 25 29 33 33

Sparsity (Circuit Miles/100 Customers) 31 2.7 3.5 2.7

% New Miles Underground 21 68.60% 88.60% 55.6%

Streetlights/Circuit Mile 22 4.1 2.3 1.75

% Underground Concrete-encased Duct 21 13% 1% 0%

Page 11: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

11 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

SAIDI: Overall Outage Duration

PC

PC

PC

Page 12: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

12 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

SAIFI: Outage Frequency

PC

PC

PC

Page 13: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

13 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

CAIDI: Outage Responsiveness

PC

PC

PC

Page 14: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Florida Power & LightBenchmarking Results

Page 15: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

15 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

2004 SAIFI - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Including Major Events)

0.1

1

0.6

4

0.6

7

0.6

7 0.8

7

0.9

0

0.9

1

0.9

6

0.9

7

0.9

8

1.0

2

1.0

9

1.0

9

1.1

2

1.1

2

1.1

2

1.1

3

1.1

7

1.2

0 1.3

2

1.3

5

1.4

2

1.4

3

1.5

0

1.5

8

1.5

8

1.5

9

1.6

6

1.6

6

1.6

7

1.6

7 1.7

7 1.9

8 2.1

3 2.2

6

3.6

0

3.6

4

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

1236

8

1218

0

1012

5

1093

0

1400

3

1187

1

1227

3

1190

7

7999

1286

6

1298

2

1283

2

1400

2

7799

1096

0

1172

4

1298

1

1268

0

1229

0

1152

9

1077

5

1287

4

1138

4

1297

9

1122

4

1226

1

1080

9

9620

1121

2

1236

1

1294

8

1166

0

1116

7

1206

5

1092

5

1201

0

1224

2

PC

FPL Benchmark Results: Calendar 2004 w/ Major Events

2004 SU - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Including Major Events)

11.5

60.9

61.9

69.8

69.9

71.7

72.0

81.0

93.2

102.

0

104.

0

107.

7

109.

3

126.

8

144.

0

145.

1

158.

0

165.

3

172.

0

173.

0

180.

5

195.

7

203.

1

208.

7

223.

7

231.

7

250.

7

259.

0

259.

2

294.

6

301.

2

316.

8

341.

8

357.

6

497.

0

1216

.8

4684

.4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

1236

8

1227

3

1093

0

1187

1

1400

3

1286

6

1218

0

1096

0

1012

5

1268

0

7999

1298

2

7799

1226

1

1172

4

1080

9

1229

0

1138

4

1298

1

1400

2

1166

0

1077

5

1190

7

1287

4

1297

9

1294

8

1116

7

9620

1236

1

1206

5

1283

2

1092

5

1121

2

1152

9

1122

4

1224

2

1201

0

2004 CAIDI - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Including Major Events)

67.2

72.0

73.2

77.2

80.1

87.0

90.2

92.9

94.0

97.3

102.

0

104.

5

106.

1

107.

0

112.

5

115.

8

126.

6

129.

0

132.

0

138.

3

138.

7

138.

8

140.

2

144.

5

147.

0

149.

1

151.

0

155.

2

156.

0

159.

0

205.

8

211.

5 271.

5

275.

3

314.

0

334.

1

1301

.2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1227

3

1096

0

1286

6

1187

1

1226

1

1268

0

1400

3

1093

0

1080

9

7799

1166

0

1236

8

1298

2

7999

1218

0

1138

4

1116

7

1172

4

1229

0

1206

5

1012

5

1294

8

1092

5

1077

5

1287

4

1297

9

1298

1

1236

1

9620

1400

2

1121

2

1190

7

1152

9

1283

2

1122

4

1224

2

1201

0

PC

PC

Page 16: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

16 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

2004 CAIDI - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Excluding Major Events)

44.8

62.3 67

.0

68.2 72

.5

73.0

73.2

74.5

76.2

78.8

81.8

84.8

85.0

86.8

88.7

90.0

92.7

92.9

95.1 10

0.0

100.

9

101.

0

102.

0

105.

4

106.

3

107.

0

107.

6 124.

0

126.

0

126.

0

126.

6

128.

0

129.

0

132.

9

141.

0

146.

0

152.

0

155.

2

159.

0

194.

1

217.

0

0

50

100

150

200

250

1201

0

1227

3

1224

2

1297

9

1226

1

1096

0

1286

6

1187

1

1400

3

1121

2

1298

0

7799

1268

0

1080

9

1206

5

1166

0

1157

9

1093

0

1298

2

1138

4

1236

8

1218

0

9620

1294

8

1190

7

7999

1092

5

1298

1

1172

4

1229

0

1116

7

1012

5

1077

5

1118

4

1287

4

1283

2

1236

9

1236

1

1400

2

1152

9

1122

4

2004 SU - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Excluding Major Events)

11.1

51.9 58

.9

61.9

62.0

63.7

66.1 71

.7

73.0

73.1 78

.8

81.4

85.3

89.0 94

.0 101.

6

102.

8

104.

0

112.

8

118.

8

122.

2

122.

7

123.

4

126.

0

127.

1

130.

0

133.

6

139.

0

139.

3

142.

6

145.

4

146.

0 165.

2

168.

7

173.

0 191.

8 202.

3 215.

5

250.

7

259.

2

281.

0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1236

8

1227

3

1400

3

1093

0

1218

0

1187

1

1096

0

1286

6

1121

2

1201

0

1012

5

7799

1190

7

1268

0

1298

2

1297

9

1226

1

7999

1283

2

1166

0

1080

9

1118

4

9620

1298

1

1138

4

1172

4

1224

2

1236

9

1206

5

1077

5

1157

9

1229

0

1298

0

1294

8

1400

2

1287

4

1092

5

1152

9

1116

7

1236

1

1122

4

2004 SAIFI - Transmission, Substation, & Distribution(Excluding Major Events)

0.11

0.61

0.62 0.

67

0.77 0.80 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.

91

0.92

0.92

0.93 0.96

0.97

0.98

0.99 1.01 1.04

1.05 1.

09 1.11

1.11 1.

16 1.21 1.

27 1.29 1.32 1.

36 1.41

1.42 1.

49 1.57

1.57 1.60 1.63 1.

67

1.88

1.98 2.

02 2.08

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1236

8

1218

0

1012

5

1093

0

1283

2

1190

7

1227

3

1187

1

1400

3

1096

0

1118

4

1236

9

1121

2

7799

7999

1286

6

1298

2

1298

1

1172

4

1268

0

1400

2

1077

5

1152

9

1229

0

9620

1138

4

1122

4

1166

0

1287

4

1080

9

1226

1

1297

9

1157

9

1206

5

1294

8

1201

0

1236

1

1092

5

1116

7

1298

0

1224

2

FPL Benchmark Results: Calendar 2004 w/out Major Events

PC

PC

PC

Page 17: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

IEEEBenchmarking Results

Page 18: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

18 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

IEEE Reliability Benchmark 105 Companies have responded at some time 2004 Survey

78 responded in 2004 56 provided details

40 were same as 2003 respondents

All Respondents 2004Quartile SAIDI IEEE SAIDI All SAIFI IEEE SAIFI All CAIDI IEEE CAIDI All

1 70.32 102.69 0.90 1.07 73.46 85.522 99.85 144.76 1.09 1.26 91.16 107.303 146.25 284.61 1.42 1.80 105.31 139.304 313.23 1113.20 3.66 4.73 472.81 472.81

PacifiCorp 172.89 315.73 1.68 2.25 102.66 140.26

Page 19: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

19 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Questions

Page 20: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

20 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Appendix

Page 21: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

21 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Outage Metrics by State

State

IEEE 1366-2001 CAIDI CAIFI SAIDI SAIFI MAIFI

Major Storm

defined

State-set Benchmark

s & Performanc

e Standards Comments

Alabama                 No Standards

Alaska             x x Minimum for Voltage

Arizona                 No Standards

Arkansas x X   x x x      

Colorado   x    x X    X  x  

Connecticut                 No Response

Delaware   x   x x       Get Update

Florida    x    x X  x    x Trial Standards

Georgia                 No Standards

Hawaii                 No Standards

Illinois x x x   x   x x  

Indiana   x x x          Utility set

Iowa             x   Get Update

Kansas x x   x x   x x  

Kentucky   x x x x x      Utility set

Page 22: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

22 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

State

IEEE 1366-2001 CAIDI CAIFI SAIDI SAIFI MAIFI

Major Storm defined

State-set Benchmarks

& Performance

Standards Comments

Louisiana       x x     x  

Maine X x     x   x    

Maryland X x   x x   x    Utility set

Massachusetts X     x x   x x See DTE Website

Michigan                 Reporting

Minnesota       x x       Utility Specific

Mississippi                 No Response

Missouri   x     x  x       Utility set

Montana                 No Standards

Nebraska                 No Standards

Nevada       x x x x    

New Hampshire                 No Response

New Jersey                 No Response

New Mexico                 No Response

New York X x x x     x x  

Outage Metrics by State

Page 23: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

23 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Outage Metrics State

State

IEEE 1366-2001 CAIDI CAIFI SAIDI SAIFI MAIFI

Major Storm defined

State-set Benchmarks

& Performance

Standards Comments

North Carolina                 No Standards

North Dakota                 No Standards

Ohio   x   x x x      

Oklahoma               x  Filings in July 2004

Pennsylvania X x   x x x x    

Rhode Island                 No Response

South Carolina                 No Response

South Dakota                 No Standards

Tennessee                 No Standards

Texas X     x x        

Vermont   x       x      

Virginia X     x x       Utility set

Washington DC X x   x x   x    

West Virginia                 No Standards

Wisconsin   x   x x        

Page 24: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

24 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Average Retail Rates by State

Page 25: Utah Service Quality Review Group Benchmarking at PacifiCorp

25 D I S T R I B U T I O N

P A C I F I C O R P

Utah Power Rates vs. Western Utilities


Recommended