Date post: | 15-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | citizens-for-accountable-governance |
View: | 808 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2.7
9
16
Parks and Open Space
105
150
220
Water Supply
30
50
82
Share of Public Transport
Current
Basic Service Standard Best in Class
30
100 100
Sewage Treated
72
100 100
Solid Waste Collected
24
0 0
Slum Popula=on
THE CURRENT SCENARIO
Metropolitan Planning CommiIee
Execu)ve Commissioner
Municipal Commissioner
Housing & Slum
Development
Water Supply ,Sewer
age and Sanita)on
Transport Educa)on
Planning
Finance Governance
• Urban infrastructure has been unable to keep pace with the growing popula)on. • 46% urban ci)es with supply below CPHEEO norm. • No major Indian city has a 24 hour supply of water. • Transmission and distribu)on networks are old and poorly maintained, and generally of a poor quality. Consequently physical losses are typically high, ranging from 25 to over 50 per cent.
• Cost recovery -‐ unable to recover even the O&M cost. • About one-‐third of the urban centers covered do not have any metered connec)ons • More dependency on groundwater leading to decline in water table
PROBLEMS
• Reduce demand and supply through beIer management and planning • Developing Public-‐Private Partnerships • Reducing pilferages and illegal connec)ons • Promote rainwater harves)ng structures • Emphasis on recharging the ground water by u)lizing the surface monsoon runoff. • Local populace to be educated regarding consequences of deple)on of ground water and conserva)on of water.
• Metering of connec)ons, both for bulk supply and retail distribu)on, must be encouraged
PROPOSED SOLUTION
WATER SUPPLY IN FUTURE CITIES
IMPLEMENTATION
• Treat sewage for industry/farming use • Signing MOUs on PPP pladorm to provide services efficiently. • Reducing pilferages and illegal connec)ons by taking stringent measures against the defaulters under the aegis of water supply as implemented in the Electricity public u)lity
• The construc)on of roof top rainwater harves)ng structures should be made mandatory by all states in building bye-‐laws in all the blocks, which will help in checking the falling water level trend in the district
• The abandoned dug wells may be cleaned and should be used for recharging the ground water by u)lizing the surface monsoon runoff. Unauthorized boring of wells should be monitored
• More emphasis on IEC Ac)vi)es as already done by GOI via WSSO in rural areas.
IMPACT
• Sewage will cater to the agricultural/irriga)on needs • More efficient services to the consumers via PPP pladorm • Reduc)on in distribu)on losses, Thereby increasing efficiency by 35-‐50%. • Conserva)on of rain water • Recharging of aquifers and increase in ground water level. • Awareness among the ci)zens and their par)cipa)on in conserva)on of water
CHALLENGES
• Treatment of Sewage as per the norms has to be ensured before using for agricultural purposes • Private companies are reluctant to enter into agreements with the public sector considering the involved uncertain)es.
• High quality distribu)on network involves high cost e.g. stainless steel pipes used in Singapore • Extra cost involved in rain water harves)ng structures will be opposed by the ci)zens • Difficulty In monitoring of unauthorized digging of borewells • Ensuring par)cipa)on of the ci)zens in urban areas.
• SEWERAGE TREATMENT • Non-‐collec)on of wastewater and discharge of untreated wastewater into various water bodies causes sewer water and land pollu)on problems
• 78 % sewage is officially untreated and disposed off in rivers, lakes, groundwater • A third-‐ of the Class I ci)es and less than one-‐figh of the smaller sized urban centres have a sewerage system
• The cost recovery is generally very low • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • Main method of waste disposal con)nues to be open dumping • Solid waste management is a labour intensive ac)vity and concerned administra)ve bodies fall short of staff for this ac)vity.
• Cost recovery from solid waste management is extremely poor
PROBLEMS
• SEWERAGE TREATMENT • Treat locally so that treated water can be used locally • Rehabilita)on of sewerage systems • Pollu)on of land or water body with untreated wastewater • Recycling/ reuse of wastewater • Wastewater treatment must be made mandatory for all sizes of urban centres • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • Reduce, reuse and recycle(3R) strategy must be adopted • open dumping of waste must be completely discouraged • Private sector par)cipa)on must con)nue to be encouraged • open dumping of waste must be completely discouraged
PROPOSED SOLUTION
SEWERAGE AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
• SEWERAGE TREATMENT • Use open drains as treatment zones • Iden)fica)on of non-‐func)onal sewerage sytems and making them func)onal • Pollu)on of land or water body with untreated wastewater be made punishable • Recycling/ reuse of wastewater for agricultural purposes ager treatment • Wastewater treatment must be made mandatory by means of policy. Technical and financial assistance must be provided • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • 3R strategy be implemented by the Govt. authori)es • Requisite measures should be taken in the design of equipment used by staff ,manpower management and planning • Private sector par)cipa)on via PPP pladorm
IMPACT
• SEWERAGE • Sewage will be treated by means of open drains without addi)onal cost • Exis)ng infrastructure will be used to the maximum poten)al • Less pollu)on due to dumping of untreated sewage • Treated sewage can be used for agricultural purposes thereby conserving water • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • Open dumping will be reduced • More efficiency in collec)on of waste and efficient solid waste management
CHALLENGES
• SEWERAGE • Foul smell due to treatment in open drains • Govt. authori)es have to be sensi)zed for effec)ve func)oning of the exis)ng infrastructure • Enforcement of punishment will be difficult • Farmers will be reluctant to use treated sewage for agricultural purposes • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • involves high cost for procurement of latest technology and hiring the requisite staff. • Private companies are reluctant to enter into agreements with the public sector considering the involved uncertaini)es.
Poor Road Co
ndi)on
s
• Broken Roads
• Number of potholes
• No street lights
• No clear driving direc=ons
• No public sidewalks
• Lack of control on dogs on roads
Lack of P
lann
ing
• Lack of law and order
• Insufficient parking space
• Patchwork of private islands
• Unmarked speed bumps
• Lack of Emergency lanes
Dearth of P
ublic Transpo
rt • No safe
commu=ng means of transport
• Deficit in public transport buses
• No proper interconnec=vity
• Unorganized traffic condi=ons
ROAD AND TRANSPORT
Proposed solu)ons
Planning of land u=liza=on
Providing a quality public transport system
Road and traffic management
ü Strategic planning to integrate offices and residen=al areas to reduce the distance of travelling
ü Micro-‐level planning to u=lize open land in the vicinity of metro sta=ons, bus depots and other public conveyance sta=ons
ü SeSng up of specialized & dedicated Urban Planning team under the purview of State/UT government
ü Metros in urban areas through PPPs
ü Bus priority schemes
ü Upgrada=on of exis=ng facili=es like air condi=oning and developing interchanging sta=ons
ü Government specula=ons on the basis of 2011 census:
• Add BRTS @ 20 km/1 Million popula=on in 51 ci=es with popula=on> 1 Million
• Add rail transit at 10 km/ Million popula=on
ü More arterial and ring expressways required
ü Government coali=on with private par=es for
• Construc=on and opera=on of toll roads
• Construc=on and opera=on of mass transit systems
ü Modeling of Electronic Road Pricing(ERP) system as successfully implemented in Singapore
ü Opening up of dead end roads
• ERPS implementa=on is expensive • Environmental concerns are growing • Large scale upgrada=on required for exis=ng deficit facili=es
• Efficient integra=on between government and private bodies in PPP
Challenges
• Sources of funds – dedicated levies, land mone=za=on, recovery from non user beneficiaries, debt and private investments
• To create facili=es for walking and cycling – non-‐pollu=ng modes that do not use fossil fuels and provide social equity
• In Vehicle Unit devices to be inbuilt in newly procured vehicles at subsidized rates; made mandatory during registra=on of the vehicle and added to the registra=on fees
• More involvement of ci=zens towards their civic responsibili=es
Mi=ga=on
Trivandrum Kochi Calicut Mangalore Ranchi Mysore Madurai Trichy Coimbatore Salem
Popula=on 957730 601574 432097 399565 2912022 755379 928869 742413 930882 696760
Slums 143659.5 90236.1 64814.55 59934.75 436803.3 113306.85 139330.35 111361.95 139632.3 104514
Families 28731.9 18047.22 12962.91 11986.95 87360.66 22661.37 27866.07 22272.39 27926.46 20902.8
Houses 14365.95 9023.61 6481.455 5993.475 43680.33 11330.685 13933.035 11136.195 13963.23 10451.4
Cost @ 4lakhs 57463.8 36094.44 25925.82 23973.9 174721.3 45322.74 55732.14 44544.78 55852.92 41805.6 Total Crores 575 361 259 240 1747 453 557 445 559 418 5614
Cost 1 Labour cost 0.2
Proposed cost 0.16 Savings 0.04 Savings % 4
Karnataka Slum Development Board WPI 1.325397
Rs. In Crores 2008-‐09 2013-‐14 Cost 730 967.53
Labour cost 146 193.50 Proposed cost 116.8 154.80
Savings 29.2 38.70 Savings % 4% 4% No. Houses 24508 24509
Cost per House 0.029 0.0394
Cost Saving Cost incurred
5614Cr 224 Cr 5390 Cr
Considering the fact that for building, 20% is the labour cost. We can employ people living in those slums at 80% of the wages as given to employed workers. This saves around 4lakhs per 1 crore. Going by the data of Karnataka slum development board, the cost of building one unit comes out to be 4 lakhs. If we consider 10 ci=es who have the poten=al of becoming the future ci=es and if we provide houses to 50% of those people who live in slums, the cost comes out to be 5400 crores. If we target year 2020; the cost comes out to be approximately 770 Cr per year.
Ø Wholesale Price Index: 1.32 (in 2012-‐13 over year 2008-‐09) Ø Considering percentage of slums in the proposed ci=es stands on the average of 15%. Ø Considering no. of people per family = 5
SLUM DEVELOPMENT MODEL
1. hIp://vsomanna.in/ach_eng.pdf 2. hIp://www.rediff.com/money/slide-‐show/slide-‐show-‐1-‐ci)es-‐that-‐will-‐shape-‐indias-‐future/20111012.htm#29 3. hIp://portal.indiainfoline.com/datamonitor/Real-‐Sector-‐Annually/Prices/Wholesale-‐Price-‐Index-‐Annual-‐Average.aspx 4. hIp://cseindia.org/userfiles/excreta-‐maIer.pdf 5. Status of Water Supply, Sanita)onand Solid Waste Managemen)n Urban Areassponsored byCentral Public Health and
Environmental Engineering Organisa)on(CPHEEO), Usha P. Raghupathi 6. McKinsey Global Ins)tute – India’s urban awakening 7. hIp://www.ndtv.com/ 8. hIp://indiatoday.intoday.in/ 9. hIp://www.gurgaonsite.com/infrastructure-‐problems-‐in-‐gurgaon.html10.
hIp://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/commiIee/wrkgrp12/hud/wg_%20urban%20Transport.pdf
BIBLIOGRAPHY