Utilization POCT inCOVID-19 Pandemic
Umi S. lnt ansari Dept Pat ologi Klinik & Kedokteran Laborat orium
FKKMK-UGM
Curriculum vitae
EDUCATIONPhD Program, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2016Specializat ion in Clinical Pat hology (main int erest : immunology), July 2007. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam- Universitas Gadjah Mada, Diploma in
Immunology, April 2004Master in Tropical Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, February 1999, Medical Doctor: Universitas Gadjah Mada February 1995,
EMPLOYMENTAssistant Professor, Clinical Pathology-Faculty of Medicine, Universitas
Gadjah Mada,Teach undergraduate and graduated studentsGuide undergraduate and graduated student on laboratory work and
researchConsultant on clinical pathology laboratory, Sardjito's hospitalConduct studies in immunology field
Introduction: : Covid 19 course of disease
Point of Care Testing
Laboratory test in Covid 19
POCT Biomarker in Covid 19
introductionC O V I D - 1 9 T i m e l i n e
1 2 . 3 1 . 1 9O f f ic i a l s in W u h a n , C h i n a
r e p o r t e d d o z e n s o f c a s e s o f
p n e u m o n i a o f u n k n o w n c a u s e .
1 . 1 3 . 2 0T h e f i r s t c a s e
o u t s i d e o f C h i n a w a s r e p o r t e d
i n T h a i l a n d .
1 . 3 0 . 2 oT h e W o r ld H e a l t h
O r g a n i z a t i o n( W H O ) d e c la r e d t h e
o u t b r e a k a " p u b l i c h e a l t h e m e r g e n c y
j o f i ncot enrTn amt i o n a l
--------1 ------------------I --------------I-1 . 7 . 2 0
C h i n e s e o f f ic i a l s id e n t i f ie d t h e n o v e l
co r o n a v ir u s .
2 . 6 . 2 oT h e f i r s t d e a t h
o n A m e r i c a n s o i l o c c u r r e d in C a l i f o r n i a .
3 . 1 1 . 2 0W H O d e c la r e d
t h e o u t b r e a ka p a n d e m i c .
1 . 2 1 . 2 oT h e U .S . a n n o u n c e d t h e f i r s t c o n f ir m e d
c a s e in W a s h i n g t o n s t a t e .
Geographic distribution
g(g Workld HealthCovid-19 Response Fund
search by country. Territory or Area
~ o r g a n i z a t i o n D o n a t e
WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) DashboardData last updated: 2020/85, 3OOpm CEST
O v e r v i e w Data Table E x p l o r e
+
Map
69HiiTotal
Deaths
V
206,709
696,147deaths
0 OownklaCI Map DataSource Wonid ieanth Organization
Global ly, as of 3:00pm CEST, 5 August 2020, there have been 18,354,342 conf i rmed c a s e s O - ·COVID-19, including 696,147 deaths, reported to WHO.
COVID-19 DI INDONESIAINFO TERKINI: Uji PCR sebanyak 963.602 orang sudah diperiksa dan hasil negatif sebanyak 840.099orang. Terkonf irm asi Co v I D -19 mencapai 123 .50 3 orang , sembuh 7 9 .306 orang, dan meninggal dunia 5.658 orang , yang tersebar di 34 provinsi dan 480 kabu pa t e n/k ot a. Penguj ian ant igen berbasis real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PC) dilakukan di seluruh Indonesia. Gunakanmasker untuk lindungi diri dan lindungi sesama, cuci tangan pakai sabun, hindari kerumunan dan#ProduktifAmanCovicdl9 #CuciTangan #MaskerUntukSemua #JagaJarak #AdaptasiKebiasaanBaru
JUMLAH TERPAPARCOVID-19 DI INDONESIA
Upda te 8 Agus tus 2020 P I . 12 .00 WIB
123.5031 7 4 9
79.306 5.658LOGISTIK DAN RELAWANUJI PCRDAERAH TELAH MENETAPKAN
GUG US TUGAS PEMBATASA N SOSIAL PENAN GA NAN BERSKALA BESAR
K O N F I R M A SI S E M B U H MENINGGAL DUNIATOTAL D ISTRIB USI
A LMA TKESTOTAL RELA WAN
MEDIS DAN NON MEDIS
43.114%TESEAR DI 26 PROV INSI
TERSEBAR DI 34 PROVINSI, 480 KABUPATEN/KOTASurnber. K@renterian Kesehatan
UPDATE TERPAPAR COVID-19 DI DUNIA TE RSEBA R DI 2 6 NEGARA DAN W ILA YA H/ T E IT ORIA L
Updat e 8 Agu t us 2020 Pt , 12.00 w I8
@11.692963 .602
ORANG
@30.5651.693.880
Sp£SIMEN3± ±es .1.l.e.r b C u a u r e a c o o 1 f a 0
38.268.451TESE aAR DI 34 PROV INSlt r C u fu r t o o l. t .
SEBARAN KUMULA'TIF KASUS AKTIF
•°5°
21.559,4172,027,074 41,585 1,180,004,3853
4IndaRusiAtrla Selat aneloiko
Peru Chili
olornbiaranIndonesia
3101o1162
3485613517228121
c 877,135538,164456,100447,624
366,671345,714120,117
23,503
14,7259,604
49,69820,2289,889
11,62417,9765,658
145,934,46259,308,690
128,932,75332,971,85419,116,20150,882,89181,992,949
269,603,400
00
9102
6 l eh t .IRE(EI DAEAWMUMTUMUATIF ASAT( 0 0 - 1%
1 100 0 1-$00 341 2000 » 2400
umber: War.letMeatth Oganiatie(WNO), warloreten ifs (UN Paolion win), B88
DANA YANG MASUK0REKE NINC LUAR NECEIU I OO NASI
Rp. 10 4,65 M Rp . 77,2 MTOTAL Rp. 237 M
• n t r t s o r cwo•UAMtLM Nu4F£.8NAIL/AGJ U NILFA«455EMUA WEI6U REKENING DALAM NEGEI
IGRAFIK KASUS HARIAN Rp. 55,19 M1-!
iI --IN-F-O--R-M-A-S, I COVID-19
: E E : g ! : ? / 119I i, ww w co@d i9 .s o i ,} CENTER
No: 146/0100/099/0VID-19/BNP8/08082020
of illness & timing of therapiesstagesStage II
(Pulmonary Phase)I
Stage III(Hyperinflammation Phase)
llA 1181II
Viral response phase
Host inflammatory response phase
Time course
Mild constitutional symptomsFever >99.6F
Dry Cough, diarrhea, headache
ARDS SIRS/Shock
Cardiac Failure
Shortness of BreathHypoxia (Pa02/Fi02<300mm#Hg)
CinicalSyrmptons
Lymphopenla, increasedprothrombin time, increased D•
Dimer and LDH (mid)
Elevated inflammatory markers(CRP, LDH, IL-6, D-dimer, ferritin)Troponin, NT-proBNP elevation
Abnormal chest imagingTransaminitis
Low-normal procalcitoninCinicalSigns
Remndesivir, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, convalescent plasma transfusionsCorticosteroicls, human immunoglobuhin,
IL-6 inhibitors,L-2 Iinhibitors,JAK inhibitors
Siddiqu HK, Mehra MR, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2020
Timeline of coronavirus onsetShortness of breath
Hospitaladmission
Intensive careunit admission
- OOnset of symptoms ARDS
-0-----------------1 3 5 6 8 9 100 2 4 7 11
NUMBER OF DAYS°
ARDS=Acute respiratory disease syndromeMedian time from onset of symptoms, including fever (in 98% of patients), cough (75%), myalgia or fatigue (44%), and others. THE LANCET
80% mild/ asymptomatic, 15% severe infection, 5% critical infection
Mild vs Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection
Isolation/hospitalizationSupportive care...
Bild n.....;.ra..
Low virus titer
r........ ml>Normal i Recovery
Ammune
response
t•Activation ~----------►
SARS-CoV-2
•• Neutrop•hil
CD4
•Cytokines:IL6/IL 10/TNF/
CD8T cell
Monocyte t tC S F / R A N ~ - - - - - - - -Macrophage
Anti-cytokine storm treatment:Cytokine antagonists/mesenchymal stem cells/convalescent plasma/chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine/corticosteroid/ alternative medicine and others
CytokineStorm
Lung injury/septic shock/organ failure/ coagu loapathy...#
ICUHigh virus titer
FI G U R E 1 Major blood leukocyt e, cyt okine changes, and therapy st rat egies in mild vs. severe SARS-CoV-2 inf ect ion. Conceptual model of the
Iinterplay between immune activation and clinical pathology from patients with mild vs. severe infection, as well as current therapeutic strategieswit h BioRender (ht t ps://a .biorender.com/ )
Cytokine storm induced by COVID-19 infection in some patients results ininfection,
organanddamage followed by immune failure, organ
death.failure, secondary
Pre-Erstnginflammnatory
Candrtic
cytokinestorm 4
Clotting Renal Failure
Shock •CardiacDamage
rune Failure,, Organ FfI ailure, Secondary infection
Diagnostic approach
Clinical suspicion: likelihood of COVID-19 is increased if the patient: resides in or has traveled to a location where there iscommunity transmission of SARS-CoV-2; or Has had close contact with a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19 in the prior 14 days,
Whom to test Symptomatic worker}
patients (priority to high risk patients, health
Select asymptomatic individuals: important for public health or infection control purposes
• The decision to test should be based on clinical and epidemiological factorsand linked to an assessment of the likelihood of infection. PCR testing of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic contacts can be considered in the assessment of individuals who have had contact with a COVID-19 case. Screening protocols should be adapted to the local situation.Rapid collection and testing of appropriate specimens from patients meeting the suspect case definition for COVID-19 is a priority for clinical management and outbreak control and should be guided by a laboratory expert. Suspect cases should be screened for the virus with nucleic acidamplification tests {NAAT), such as RT-PCR.
•
Laboratory testing strategy recommendations for COVID-19: interim guidance, 22 March 2020. https://apps.who.int
The Need forDevices
a Rapid Detection Method and Portable Detection
Lab confirmationLab
confirmation First caseT
1/) I 71edFirst case
Potential casesDetecti on/Reporting
(/)0 90 I
S%6 00 50'0 40
Detection /Reporting
II
II
Response 0 90l'& « lO 70
60
ResponseIgo
I
•O 50Opportunity for control is minimal
40n 30 0 30
£E20
z o l ± e . e e e » a2 1 010 Z o l a . s e e
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31
Number of days37 401 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
Number of daysImpact of early reporting of infectious diseasesin controlling and preventing an outbreak
Impact of delayed reporting of infectious diseases in controlling and preventing an outbreak
Nguyen T et al. 2020. Micromachines. 11(3):306
POINTDefinition
OF CARE TESTINGCharacteristic
• Point of care testing (POCT) is defined as ••
user friendlynot require any"clinical laboratory testing conducted close
to the site of pat ient care, typically by clinical personnel whose primary training is
extensivetraining to operatecan be used either in
hospit al environment , in the laboratories or at patient bedside without anydifficulty.
•not in the clinical laboratory sciences orpatients {self-testing).
by
• POCT refers to any testing performedoutside of the tradit ional, core or central laboratory".
POINT OF CARE
T R A N S P O R T A B L E
• a[Ya«» To determine the actual cost ofthe
test process, each step of the service chain must be ident if ied and evaluated for it's contribution to the total cost of the test performed.
initiates test
request
TM
• no.osTest Results
review ed by staff
r10:10Phlebotomist dispatched
to draw sample
Results reported
to the
LABORATORY SERVICE CHAIN turnaround time:
1 hour, SO minutes
POCT is an increasingly popular means of delivering laboratory testing.
When usedappropriately
when over-utilizedor incorrectly performed• POCT can improve
patient outcome• faster resu It• a shorter timeframe
to therapeutic intervention.
• POCT presentspatient risk.• False results
a
POCT is not freely interchangeable withpatient care situations
traditional core lab instrumentation in all
in POCTQuality issueless analytically sensitive
more at risk ofinterferences
performed not bylaboratory trained
individual
• Daily QC• Instrument maintenance• Troubleshooting
WHO assured criteria of ideal characteristics for a POCTin resource-limited setting
••••
Affordable by those at risk of infectionSensitive (few false negatives) Specific (few false positives)User friendly (simple to perform and needs minimum training)Rapid (t o enable t reat ment at first visit ) and robust ( does not need refrigerated storage)No equipmentDelivered to those who need it
•
••
The Critical Role of Laboratory Medicine in COVID-19(Modified from: Lippi et al, PMID: 32191623)
rs-CoV-2 Laboratory DiagnosticsRT-PCR, Anti•SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
RT-PCR(See DiagnosticTesting)
EpidemiologicalSurveillance· ~....- - - - - - - - - - ---= =
•
Infection Diagnosis
JOvert Disease
StagingPatient
ManagementVariousTests(See
IVDPrognost icat ion
BiochemicalMonitoring)
Therapeut ic Monitor ingDeath
Anti-SARS-CoVantibodies
EpidemiologicalSurveillance
Etiology diagnosis of covid 19 Infection
Virus particle
The essential role of clinicallaboratories in this pandemic extends be and etiolo icaldiagnosis of COVID-19
M WRNA
Infection
YlgG
Nucleocapsid protein
X lgA
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of strategies for the detection of COVID-19 patients.
lgM
Value
• Inform individual of infection status so they can anticipate course of illness and take action to prevent transmission
• Individual
Nucleic acidamplification test for viral RNA(nasopharyngeaf swab, oropharyngea/ swab, sputum, bronchoafveofar lavage fluid, others)
Current infection withSARS-Co\V-2
• Inform patient management and actions needed to prevent transmission
• Healthcare or long-term care facility
• Inform actions needed to prevent transmission
• Public health
• Detect susceptible individuals (antibody negative) and those previously infected
• Identify those potentially immune to SARS-CoV-2(if tests can detect protective immunity, individuals could be returned to work)Antibody
detection•Past exposure to
SARS-CoV-2• Identify individuals with
neutralizing antibodies• Healthcare facilities:
Experimental therapy
• Facilitate contact tracing and surveillance
• Public health
http://mbio.asm.org/
covid 19The challenge in pandemic
Current Diagnosis method available for Covid 19' ' i ) [)
' 4 - '
Next generationsequencing(NGS)
Whole genome sequencing Highly sensitive and specific,Provide all related information;
Can identify novel strain
Fast results
Higher sensitivity
1-2 day High expertiseEquipment dependency and high cost
Highly sophisticated Lab required
Higher costs due to the use of expensive consumables
Expensive lab equipment
Detection is also complex and time consuming
RT-PCR Specific primer-probe baseddetection
3-4h
Needs small amount of DNA
Can be performed in a single stepWell established methodology in viral diagnostics
Highly repeatable and accurate
Single working temperatureLAMP More than two sets of
specific primers pair based detection
Antigen/Antibodies IgG/ IgM
1 h Too sensitive, highly prone to falsepositives due to carry-over or cross- contamination
Testing come after 3-4 days of infection
False positive
Testing come after 3-4 days of infectio
False ositive
Indistinguishability from other viral pneumonia and the hysteresis of abnormal CT
Low sensitivity as isolation is not 100%
Serological(traditional)
Sensitive and specific 4-6 h
Rapidserological
Antigen/Antibodies IgG/IgM
POCT 15-30 min
Chest images Enhance sensitivity of detection iffindings combined with RT-PCRresults
Highly (100%) specific
Gold standard
1 h
Virus isolation In vitro live virus isolationand propagation
5-15 days Kumar et al., Virusdis. (April•june 2020) 31(2):97--105
Positivity rate of SARS CoV-2 Detection in DifferentClinical Specimens
Clinical Specimen
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
Positive Rate
93% (14/15)72% (72/104)
63% (5/8)
Fibrobronchoscope brush biopsy
Pharyngeal swabs46% (6/13)
32%(126/398)
29% (44/153)1% (3/307)
0% (0/72)
IFCC Information Guide on COVID-19 -IFCC. www.ifcc.org
Estimated Variation Over Time in Diagnostic Tests for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 InfectionRelative to Symptom Onset
l h l d l E E E E
) lc:
( D_e_te_c_ti_o_n_u_n_lik_e_ly_a P_C_R_-_L_ik_e_ly_p_o_s_it_iv_e _ , . ) ( P_C_R_-_L_ik_e_ly_n_e_g_at_iv_e_b )
(._ A_n_t_ib_o_d_y_d_et_e_c_ti_o_n ,.)
,,,,' ,,,, ,,,
-4' ++4
4 +4 +
44 +
5 +
=04+
4
,,,,u5.ecu
e,,,,,
4
i o ,•4••
Week -2 Week -1 Week 1 Week 2 Week3 Week4 Week 5 Week6
Symptom onset
- - - N a s o p h a r y n g e a l s w a b P C R
- - - V i r u s i s o l a t i o n f r o m r e s p i r a t o r y t r a c t
- - - B r o n c h o a l v e o l a r l a v a g e / s p u t u m P C R
Stool PCR
lgM antibody
lgG antibody
Kemkes: REV-OS Pedom an P2 COVID-19 13 Juli 2020
• Pemeriksaan dengan Rapid TestPenggunaan Rapid Test tidak digunakan untuk diagnostik. Pada kondisi dengan keterbatasan kapasitas pemeriksaan RT-PCR, Rapid Test dapat digunakan untuk skrining pada populasi spesifik dan situasi khusus, seperti pada pelaku perjalanan
(termasuk kedatangan Pekerja Migran Indonesia, terutama di wilayah Pos Lintas
Batas Darat Negara (PLBDN), serta untuk penguatan pelacakan kontak sepertila pas, panti jompo, panti rehabilitasi, asrama, pondok pesantren, dan pada kelompok-kelompok rentan.
WHO merekomendasikan penggunaan Rapid Test untuk tujuan penelitian epidemiologi atau penelitian lain. Penggunaan Rapid Test selanjutnya dapat
mengikuti perkembangan teknologi terkini dan rekomendasi WHO.
di
•
Types of COVID-19 rapid tests currently in use or in development:
Direct SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection• detect viral components present during the infection
nasopharyngeal secretions.• Viral Particle• Nucleocapsid Protein
Indirect antibody-SARS-CoV-2 detection
in samples like
• detect the antibodies that later appear in serum as response against the virus.
part of the immune
•••
Anti Spike Protein,Anti Nucleocapsid Protein, Antibody to Combination SP/NP
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Stockholm, 2020.
POCT Antigen:the use of point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests for COVID-19 (WHO)Advice on
expressed infection.
only when the virus is actively replicating identify acute or early
Depend to
• the time
several factors:
from onset of illness, -the quality of the specimen-the precise formulation of the reagent• the concentration of virus,
false-positive results: if the ab other than COVID-19 .
on the test strip also recognize antigens of viruses
adequate performance test could potentially be used as triage tests to rapidly identify patients who are very likely to have COVID-19,-reducing or eliminatingthe need for expensive molecular confirmatory testing.
Performances of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-strip.
RT-qPCRLow performance of rapidCOVID-19 diagnosis
antigen detection test as frontline testing forDetected Not detected
COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip 3274
DetectedNot detected
042
Ensuring accurate diagnosis is essential to limit the spread of the virus
Little use inpandemic setting
Can nott role out SARS CoV inf.
False negative result
Sensitivity30,2%
A. Scohy, et al. Journal of clinical virolo
- 876543210
l • High sensitivity in nasopharyngealsamples wit h high viral load equivalent at least to 1.7 x 105 copies/mL (Ct <25), but the sensitivity declines substantially when the viral load decreases with Ct values over 30,equivalent to 9.4 x 10 copies/mL
Ec.oJ' = - •• • 0} ¢ • •0--·--5>
0 l
0 0
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Ag Respi-Strip Results
1. COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip results according to viral load.
A. Scohy, et al. Journal of clinical virology 129 (2020)
Evaluation of novel antigen-based rapiddetection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
•4 0
•in respiratory samples• •• «3 5
• The evaluated RDT showed a highsensitivity and specificity in samples mainly obtained during the first week of symptoms and with high viral loads,Potential to become an important tool for early diagnosis of SARS•CoV-2, particularly in limited accessto molecular methods.
«
•3 0
•Q> ••f-;;;
•>t ,
2 0
••$
•%t• • •
% •1 5
• •$$ •$ •• '1 0
0 1 2 5 1 0 11 123 4 6 7 8 9
D a y o f s y m p t o m s
Cycle threshold (Ct) values and lineal trend line of70 RT-PCT positive samples taken on different days after symptom onset. Dots colours represent false negative (red) andtrue positive (blue) results by antigen detection test.
International Journal of Infectious Diseases DOI: (10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098)
A IU M t I KSAANA P D I I A N T 6 I N
1Ropid Test (+)
- - - - I(v . w t ' p r t u m t
heri b r tr ut turt
owl '
opid Test (-)
est t i r e t/ICM SAMSole i diiwi.l e «lrae tole+eels m e m b e r t , @ e r e l f e y
r 1hdal munul gelsSPA dlmn 10 hart
Ga ts»A munculd lm «10 hn fa lit bl . n
c 0 v 0 1 9opid Test Antilodi[to h a i l r d n ]
r w ' l 'Rapid Test Antigen
J~··uln
e t tine C / I C M $ A S. l i t b l n( 0 0 1 9 Gov2$wt/'@tum 2 g2
h i b r t u t t r t )
g ora l i t b l . ncov 1%
Tnpa 6ejala Ringan
Io l a i Dini di
Alur Pemeriksaan Rapid Test SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)Usulan PDS PatkLin
Berdasarkan Pertemuan online koordinasi lintas sektoralterkait perijinan produk tes kit COVID-19 denaan Kemenkes tanaaal 20/3/2020
Pesien yang pertu sinning ataupemerksa an CO1 0-19
•Penentuan orang lortaix eat risilo tingg /
rendah tu orangdalarn pernartauan
[- -P E y R s w _ [
RAIPDTEST ANTIG EN
L iz lom_==[E7
peErmrnerkzsaan PCR / j =--ylwjuk ke N mlh sait rujuk.an untu pernerksa an PCR
Y ¥
pemeriksaan rapid pemnerksan rapidtest antibody utang
7.t0h a n
a:test antibody utang
,10h a n
l }HASIL NEGATIFMou Renn)
A S IL POSITIF IHASIL NEGATIFN O N ~ ~REAKTIF .II Dianggap tdal
tarintakwOianggap tidal
teninelu IIRujuk ks rurah salt rjulan untuk' perorksaan PCR ,
~ k M ~ ~-p.e-menksaan-CRsalt rujutan untuk
L J Gjale Brat (ButuhPerswatan Rs)
or6/ op/PDP
•Rapid test Ab guidline ALUR PEMERIKSAA N
RAPID TEST ANTIBODl
iRapid Test (-)
iRapid Test (+)
IReal time PCR/TCM SAR• Cov-2 Swab/Sputum 2x(2
hand berturut -turut)
solasi diri, 10 harikemudian ulang Rapid Test. hika selama isola si gejala memberat,
egeta ke Fasyankes
Rapid Test ulngI Pos1t1INegatif
Sakit 'bukan
Positit
iReal time CR/ICM SARcov 5wab/ Sputum 2 [2
hari berturut turut]
Sakit bukanC0VI0-19
TerkonfirmasicovID-19
C0VI0-19
Positif
5alit bukncov0-19
Terkonfrm.alC0VI0-19
E.Tanpa Gejala
Isolasi Dini di
Rumah
Ringan Sedang
IBerat
' ' Ilsolsi Dini di
RumahRujuk ke RS rujukan
Serology: Antibody test
Serological surveys can aid investigation of an ongoing outbreak andretrospective assessment of the attack rate or extent of an outbreak.
In cases where NAAT assays are negative and there is a strong epidemiologicallink to COVID-19 infect ion, paired serum samples (in the acut e and convalescent phase} could support diagnosis once validated serology tests are available.Serum samples can be stored for these purposes.
Paired samples are necessary for confirmation with the initial sample collectedin the first week of illness and the second ideally collected 2-4 weeks later
Cross reactivity to other coronaviruses can be challenging
• lgM ELISA can increase the positive
detection rate when combined with
the PCR method
• positive detection rate was only 51.9%in a single PCR test, but significantly increased (98.6%) when an lgM ELISA assay was applied to PCR-negative
patients
- 98.6C 1 0 08 079 60
c
Q)
4020
Q)
=>,.,,
RoL. Guo et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020), doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
The factors that influence antibody detection performance
FalsePositive
Previously infection by SARS CoV
Anti(SP):
RBD11-14
daysCollecting time samples: Different time seroconversion
Anti NP: 7-12 daysFalse
NegativeHost immune factors: different
immune responses to NP and SPamong people.
Hasil survey performa RDT antibodi SARS COV-2
• Tujuan melihat kondisi performa RDT covid di lapangan• Post marketing surveillance RDT yang beredar
Data sekunder dari komunitas dan rumah sakit
Anonimus dan tidak ada conflict of interestData sekunder sebanyak 130.693 data yang dikumpulkan
••• dari komunitas
dan rumah sakit di seluruh cabang PDS PatKLln {30 cabang mencakup 34provinsi)Didapatkan 63 merk RDT yang digunakan di seluruh IndonesiaBaku emas yang digunakan adalah metode rRT-PCR dan TCM
••
Performa ROTSARS COV-2
antibodi lgG dan lgM
5s1.mPCR
I TOTAL
[ E T . I I . ] Total TotalRapid Test (lgG)Positif300
Negatif3797
Positif314
Negatif39504097 4264
[ E I Z E Z I ' .7/EI'E7[TETTEH7
Rapid Test {lgG)ReaktifNon Reaktif
183131
8523098
23271770
163137
21641633
10353229
95%CI 95% ClETTIE]EIT I E E EH7ZIEL EE7AI7)ETl
43,8454,3343,01
7,0092,26
0,951,06
42,3248,7041,43
4,1291,41-0,150,74
45,3659,9744,587,82
93,112,051,39
76,9558,2878,4317,6895,94
2,700,53
75,6852,8377,1513,4695,33
0,910,31
78,2163,7379,7118,8796,564,500,76
AkurasiSensitivitas Spesifisitas PPVNPV+LR-LR
/_ Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Klinik dan KedoteranLaboratorium Indonesia( )
Masalah teknis yang ditemukan
•• Garis hasil samar / tidak jelas (Biolidies, Boson, Eagteeare, Edan, Genbody,
Wondfo, Vazyme, VivaDiag, Livzon, High Top, SD Biosensor, Star)Hasil TidakJelas • Hasil sangat tebal seperti kotoran ulang = non reaktif (Egens)
• False positive (VivaDiag, Edan, SD Biosensor, Setro, Wondfo)• High Top: pasien geriatri dengan komorbid & gravid
• False negative (High Top, Biozek)• Pasien swab (+), hasil non reaktif, duplo merk lain don Abbott(+)
• Garis kontrol tidak muncul (Aero, High Top, Lungene, Vazyme, Wondfo)• Muncul 5 garis da lam 1 alat uji (Viva Diag)
HasilInvalid
{{
• Strip sangat kecil (Aero)• Pipet sulit digunakan (High Top, Livzon)• Jumlah lgM don lgG tidak sama (Livzon)• Tidak ado buffer don pipet (Edan, New Test)
Kit KurangLengkap
Prosedurunclear
• SOP rumit (Aero, Edan)• buffer ditetes 20-30 detik sesudah sampel, strip sangat kecil (Aero)
Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Klinik dan KedoteranLaboratorium Indonesia
KesimpulanBanyak ROT beredar yang tidak memiliki rekomendasi/tugas/ FDA/ CE
sertifikasi gugus
Validitas ROT antibodi SARS COV-2 yang bervariasilgG sensitivitas 33-96% dan spesifistas 19-100% -
lgM sensitivitas 16-100% dan spesifisitas 7-97%
••
Performa lgG secara umum lebih baik dibanding lgM anti SARS COV-2Ditemukan hasil PCR positif disertai hasil lgG reaktif , yang mengindikasikan lgG dapat timbul pada fase akutDijumpai banyak masalah teknis terkait pemakaian ROT COVID-19•
RekomendasiPemilihan RDT per lu dipert imbangkan dengan memperhat ikan performa dan masalah teknis yang timbul
Perlunya diadakan post marketing surveillance dari user untuk setiap masalah yang ditemukan di lapangan
Perlunya pelatihan untuk petugas (SDM) yang akan melakukan pemeriksaan RDTterutama dalam hal pengerjaan dan interpretasi
Berkaitan dengan rendahnya validitas RDT, tidak direkomendasikan penggunaan RDT secara tunggal, namun dikombinasikan dengan parameter lain yaitu klinis (formulir sesuai buku pedoman Kememkes) serta pemeriksaan lab lain (PCR, CBC)
Tidak merekomendasikan penggunaan RDT antibody tunggal untuk skrining dan diagnosis COVID-19 namun untuk surveilans (seroprevalence) dengan
mempertimbangkan performa RDT yang akan digunakan
•
•
•
•
•
Main laboratory abnormalities observed in adult patients withunfavorable COVID-19 progression (Modified 1-30)aboratory Test bnormali t ies otential cl inical signif icance
Bacterial (super)infection
Bacterial (superinfection
Decreased immunological response to
Increased white bloodcell
Increase neutrophil countomplete bloodount Decreased lymphocyte count the virus
Decreased platelet count Consumption (disseminated)coagulopa thyImportant in critical care managment Impairment of liver function Pulmonary injury and/or widespread organ damageLiver injury and/or organ damageLiver injury and/or organ damageLiver injury Kidney injury Kidney Injury Cardiac injuryActivation of blood coagulation and/ordisseminated coagulopathyActivation of blood coagulation and/or disseminated coag ulopathyBacterial (super)infectionSevere viral infection/viremia/viralsepsis
Estimated modificationsDecreasedIncreased
Increased Increased IncreasedIncreasedEstimated IncreaseIncreased
Increased
lo o d aseslbumln
otal bilirubinreatininreaardiac tror nin
Increased
Increased
Increased
IncreasedIncreased
rothrombin Time
rocalcitonin
reactive protein
erritinokines IL-6
Severe inflammationCytokine storm syndrome
IFCC Information Guide on COVID-19- IFCC. www.ifcc.org
C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
Synthesized within 6-8 hours of exposure to an infective process or tissue damageHalf life 19hrs and may reach to 1000 fold during an acute phase responsePeaks at 36-50 hours. It decreased when there was no stimuli
•
•
•
• It has higher sensitivity and specificity than total neutrophils and I/Tratio (immature granulocyte to total).
3#Respiratorytract infection
0
·0·0·w
L r
Figure 1]Functional CRP patways. In response to cytolines such as IL6 and IL 1$. hepatic expression of CRP increases dramatically. Circulating CRP opsonies bacteria and apoptotic cells, facilitating their clearance via the complement system and Foy/mediated phagocytosis. CRP ligation might controute to the release by phagocytic cells of immunomodulatory cytolioe s such as IL10. Evidence is mounting tat plasma CRP deposited onto inflamed tssue breaks into biologcaly active monomeric subunits, to which have been attributed a range of proinflammatory effects . Abbreviations. CRPf o e t i n w n t a l e p l n h a e n h a i h r i t r l r e
Original article
C-reactive protein levelsL Wang
in the early stage of COVID-19
IN F O A R T I C L E A B S T R A C T
Hitorigue de tarncie Baoiground c0OVID 19 is a new infect ious disease , for which there th erefo re necessary to explore biomarkers to determine the ext ent of lu Objective. We aim ed toa ssess the use fulnessc& CP leve ls in the ear ly s t , th em with tung lesions and severe presentat ion
ru le 26 mar a0UAccept& e 30 mars 20.20Dispouble sur Interre t le 11 Mr« h 20t
At the early stage of COVID-19, CRP levels werepositively correlated with lung lesions. CRP levels could reflect disease severity and should be used as a key indicator for disease monitoring.
Mild group Moderate group Severe group Critical group
- C R P l e v e l s - Diameter of the largest lung lesion
, T i i W IL EC-reactive protein correlates with computed tomographicfindings and
I(E)
%z·%5 «c:i.
predicts severe COVID-19 early
(F)C reactive protein
, CT scores15- S e v e n t y group-« Mild group
compared with severitygroup.P<0.05
- Seventy group-« Mild groupcompared with severity
group.P<0 0510
·. s: Initial stageStage lz0 •• •£ Stage 2 : Progression stagse e sf.e dA v , r a g e d
4 Stage 4 : Recovery stage3
Stage of illness
2 3Stage of illness
"CRP increased significantly at the initial stage insevere COVID-1 9 patients; while still no significant diffe rence in the CT scores were found between the severe and mild groups"
Tan et al, 2020. DOI 10.1002/mv.25871•
Procalcitonin,,Hormokines''
Hormones expressed like CytokinesHealthy Se
ThyroidLeukocytesPerit. MacrophagesSpleenLung Liver Kidney Adrenals BrainSpine Stomach PancreasSmall intestineColon Heart MSkinAdipose TissueTestes
InflammationBacterial InterferonToxins tat.ai-1»TNFa
Procalcitonin
Thyrocytes c-Cells
! uscle~Thyroxine Calcitonin
e $
Muller B. et al. J CIin Endocrinol Metab 200
Co-infection with respiratory pathogens among COVID-2019 casesXiaojuan Zhu, Yiyue Ge', Tao Wu, Kangchen Zhao, Yin Chen, Bin Wu, FengcaiBaoli Zhu"", Lunbiao Cui
Zhu,
- - - - · - - - - - -C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f r e s p i r a t o r y p a t h o g e n s w i t h t h e S A R S - C o V - 2 c o - i n f e c t i o n .
No. (%)
Charac t e r i s t i cTotal(n =257)
242 (94.2)
81 (31.5)
A s y mp t o ma t i c( n = 2 2 )
21 (95.5)
l\Iild(n = 78)
75 (96.2)
26(33.3)
75 (96.2)
18 (23.8)
26(33.3)
20 (25.6)
11
(14.1)
Moderate(n= 140)
129 (92.1)
(n= 17)
17 (100)Co-infections
any virus isolated 4 ( 8 . 2 ) 45 (32.1 6(35.3)
any bacteriai so la ted '
any fungi isolated°
236(91.8)
60 (23.3)
21(95.5) 124(88.6) 16 (94.1)
6 (27.3) 31 (22.1) 5(29 .9 )
Bacteria-virus 77 (30.0) 4 (18.2) 42 (30) 5(29 .5 )
Bacteria-fungi 61 (23.7) 5 (29.5)6027.3) 30 (21.9
Virus-fungi 24 (9.3) 1(4.5) 11 (7.9) 1(5.9)
Bacteria- virus-fungi 23 (8.9) 1(4.5) 10 (7.1) 1(5.9)
Procalcitonin
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
serial procalcitonin measurement may playa role for predicting evolution towards a more severe form of diseasereflect bacterial coinfection in those
Clinica Chimica Acta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cca
7 4_2 a T $ } "£ %
Study
Guan et al, 2020
2Zang et al, 2020
Hang et al, 2020
Wang et al, 2020
0R(95%.0 % Weight
contributing to complicate the clinicalpicture
4,14( 206, 8,33) 38.0
3,25 (1,48, 7,15) 29.8
350 (0,82,14,93) 8.8
10,91 ( 4,48,26.56) 234
Overal
0=456,p-0.21, 02-34%
4,76 (274, 8.29) 100.0
10 12 14 16 18 20 22OR
24 26
l i K ] [t,l e t + ; i [ i
Clotting Optimal time forAbnormal Bf o gFibrin(ogen)D-Dimer
tt
Normal toslightly increased but increasing
Bleeding and Thrvomb-oc»ytopeniat Fibrin(ogen)
4
D.-di.mer
tD-dimer
P-selectin
COVID-19 Personalized TreatmentCOVID-19 Point-Of-Care Options
TEG*Platelet function tests
F ibrinogen, P-selectin and vWF concentrations Other circulat ing inflammatory marker
concentrationst cytokine stormInt. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5168
Why are D-dimer levels elevated in severe courses of COVID-19 patients?
activatedImmune
cells and a potential
influence of cytokines
Inflammatoryprocesses
and infections
(COVID-19)
This highnumber of
blood clots is degraded by fibrinolysis.
D-dimera marker for increased coagulation processes in the body.
D-dimer levels correlate with D-dimer is commonly elevated in patients
with COVID-19 and reliable prognostic marker for in-hospital mortality .
disease severity
Table 4 Test characteristics of D-dimer for predicting in-hospitalmortality with the optimal sensitivity andCutoff point for D-dimer (mg/L)
Area under curve
95% Cl
Subjects with D-dimer > 2.14 mg/L (6)
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Likelihood ratio
specificity scores2.14
0.85
0.77-0.92
77 (31.2%)
88.2
71.3
3.08
Correlations of D-dimer levels with clinical stagingYao et al. Journal of Intensive Care (2020) 8:49
Possible approach to empiric anticoagulation in COVID-19No 'fpvr prophylactic anticoagulation (consider
higher dose than normal, if D-dimer ismoderately elevated).
Is D-dimer above 1,000-2,000 ng/ml?
]rsContraindication to anticoagulation?
Follow serial D-dimer (If D-dimer rises above1,000-2,000 ng/mu, then re-consider
anticoagulation).Yes
]Check fibrinogen level and/or thromboelastography (TEG)
Normal or hyper-coagulable pattern (nearly always)- R-time low or normal on thromboelastogrophy- Fibrinogen level is normal or elevated
Hypo-coagulable pattern (rare, late-stage)- R-time prolonged on thromboelastography• Fibrinogen level low
][Therapeutic anticoagulation, e.g.:- Normal renal function: therapeut ic dose low molecular weight heparin- Renal failure heparin infusion
No anticoagulation
f ..
"Follow fibrinogen level and/ or thromboelastography occasionally. Discontinue anticoagulation if evidence of hypo• coagulable pat tern.For severe hypercoagulability, consider addition of aspirin
, )'-
The role of anticoagulation remains unknown and highly controversial. This is one general approach which couldbe reasonable, but treatment decisions should always be individualized.
f l t r n t Seel el Critical Care, ty r ut Crit
15TH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19
I I I I I
1.2.3.4.
D-dimer* Prothrombin time Platelet count Fibrinogen** v
1.2.3.4.
D-dimer markedly raised Prothrombin time prolonged Platelet count 100 x 109/L Fibrinogen <2.0 g/L
1.2.3.4.
D-dimer not markedly raised Prothrombin time normal Platelet count normal Fibrinogen elevated
IV
Admit (even if no other concerns) Monitor once or twice daily
If admitted for other clinical reasons, Monitor daily
If discharged, use as baseline for if re-presenting with symptoms
l •In all patients
Start prophylactic doseWorseninglow molecular weight heparin In non-bleeding patients, keep
► platelet count above 20 x 10/L► fibrinogen above 2.0 g/L
In bleeding patients, keep► platelet count above 50 10/L• Blood products as per protocol (see box on the
right)• Consider experimental therapies
► fibrinogen above 2.0 g/L» PT ratio <1.5 (not the same as INR)
Patklin
Terimakasih