Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | whitney-cecily-price |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
U T I L I Z I N G
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
INTRODUCTION
Team City of Greensboro HDR Constructors Garney
Capital Improvement Needs Townsend WTP TZO WRF
CMAR vs. Alternate Delivery Methods
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) in Greensboro Owner Objectives / Goals RFQ Process
CM Selection Design and Partnering
Designer and CM Pre-Construction Timeline
DESIGN-BID-BUILD Traditional Baseline for Project Delivery Proven Procurement Solution
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
FINAL DESIGN BID CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS
Design-Bid-Build ADVANTAGES Competitively Bid Separate Contracts Self-Performance Capabilities Time-Tested Process / Used in All States Maximizes Owner Input
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
Design-Bid-Build DISADVANTAGES Limited Collaboration / Teamwork Eliminates Qualifications-Based Selection No Contractual Relationship Adversarial Approach
Low Bid Value Engineering Design
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
DESIGN-BUILD Design and Construction Fixed Price Based on Concept Design and/or
Description from Procurement Documents
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FINAL DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS
Design-Build ADVANTAGES Team Qualifications-Based Selection Accelerated Schedule Public Acceptance for Lump-Sum Contract Self-Performing Contractor Controls
Schedule Known Performance Criteria Final GMP
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
Design-Build DISADVANTAGES Longer Procurement Process Eliminates or Reduces Participation in
Procurement Process Inefficient Use of Municipal Funds and Staff
Time Bidding Process
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
CMAR Qualifications-Based Selection Contractor Engaged Early in Design Phase Two-Contract Relationship
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FINAL DESIGN
CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS
CMAR ADVANTAGES Owner Control of Project Goals Provides for Value Engineering (VE) and
Constructability Reviews Contractor-Led Estimates Reduces Overall Risk Schedule Acceleration Competitive Selection
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
CMAR DISADVANTAGES Engineer’s Estimate for Initial Project Costs Potential Cost Increase with VE and
Constructability Review Preconstruction Services Cost Double-Bonding Separate Contracts Increased Design Duration
DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS
TZO WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
Retrofitting Existing Anthracite Media Filters with new Aqua-Aerobic Systems Diamond Cloth Filter Equipment
New Chlorine Contact Tank
Chemical System Upgrades
Site-Wide Stormwater Improvements
Electrical Improvements
PRECONSTRUCTION AT TZO
Estimates at 90% Document Phase
Development of CPM Schedule
Executed Mentor / Protégé Program with Local MBE, SRS
M/WBE Work Packages
TZO CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS
Challenges & Benefits
Dividing Competitive Work Packages
Flexibility with NCDEQ Filter Construction Sequencing - Eliminating
Option to Bypass Filters
Increasing Minority Participation
Constructability / Cost Review at 90%
TZO SCHEDULE
Work Packages Constraints of Existing Plant Operations
Minimal Shutdowns / Uninterrupted Access
Effluent Filter Modifications One Bank
of Filters Off-Line Per Time
TOWNSEND WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Lime / PAC Facility Flocculation & Sedimentation Basins Filter Upgrades Backwash Process Upgrades
MAY 16 –
DEC 17
JAN 15 –
DEC 15PRECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
TOWNSEND PRECON METHODOLOGY
Cost Models 60% Documents VE
Early Project Schedule Development Input from O&M Staff, Engineer and
Subcontractors Determines General Conditions Duration
Subcontracting Packages Facilitate Area Market Clear Scope Delineation
TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - GMP
Open Book Environment
Collaborative Preconstruction Workshops
Proactive Project Execution Planning - Plant Production Restrictions
Constructability and Value Analysis Procurement (Buy-Out)
Plan
Start-Up and Commissioning Plan
TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS – M/WBE
Aspirational Goals
Commitment to M/WBE Program
Outreach and Communication with Interested Individuals
Provide Guidance during Bidding, Contracting and Construction Phases
Ensure Parties Follow City’s Guidelines for Implementation
CMAR AT TOWNSEND WTP
Qualifications-Based Selection
Better Control of Construction
Implementation of M/WBE Program
Collaborative and Team-Oriented Project Delivery
Less Adversarial Construction Environment
TOWNSEND – ENGAGING THE CMAR EARLY
60% Design Documents Understand Project Budget Ability to Value Engineer Project Early Development of CPM
TOWNSEND – CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - MOPO
Maintenance of Plant Operations (MOPO) Ability to Redesign Identify Schedule Constraints Minimize Timeframe for Outages Ability to Understand Construction
Sequencing
TOWNSEND PROJECT SCHEDULE
Early Development of CPM Schedule Identified Sequencing Incorporated Peak Times Sequenced MOPOs
OWNER CHALLENGES - LEGAL
Contract Vehicle State Standard Contract vs. CMAA vs. AIA
Prequalification Process State Statute Requirements Criteria to Prequalify Target Audience for the Process
OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE
Disparity Study Hispanic Participation - Goal Achievement
Setting of Goals GMP Estimate or Trade Packages
Bid Responsiveness Prequalification vs. Bids
HUB Understanding of Formal Bid Process
OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE (CONT.)
Mentor – Protégé City Procedure Goal Achievement
New Process for Evaluating Good Faith CM Level and Sub-Tier Level
Mandatory Prequalification Participation Responsiveness Education
OWNER CHALLENGES - DESIGN
Design Completion Level 60% Townsend vs. 90% TZO
Self-Performance State Statute
Team Cohesiveness Experience Receptiveness to Feedback
Design Review Process Constructability and VE
GMP Finalization / Sub-Contract Execution Budgeting Value Engineering
Construction Phase NTP and Duration
NEXT STEPS
M/WBE Understanding Budgeting / Value Engineering Prequalification Process Staff Understanding of CMAR Process
Educate Key Departments / Staff Develop Procedures to Support Delivery
Method
KEY TAKEAWAYS
QUESTIONS?