Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | timothy-sharp |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Utilizing Stockpiled Bermudagrass to Reduce Hay
Feeding Costs
Why all the interest in stockpiling?
• “Cow/calf enterprise has been profitable 9 out of past 16 years.”Cattle Fax
• We must do something different!
Cost of feeding hay?
Cost of feeding hay?1200 lb round bale example
Nutrients removed $13.68
Harvesting $14.00
Stacking and feeding $ 2.32
Storage loss $ 6.00
Feeding loss $ 4.00
Total $40.00
Or $66.67 per ton
Source: Redmon, OSU and Coffey, Noble Foundation
Harvested forage is used to preserve forage quality and fill
gaps in forage availability
Can we manage standingforage for adequate qualityand availability to maintain gestating cows?
Stockpiling is not a newidea for Oklahoma cattlemen
Can we do this at a lower cost compared to feedinghay?
How well does bermuda quality hold up?
Likely dependant on weather, fertility and stage of maturity at frost.
Bermuda Yield by N Fertilization Rate
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 50 100 150 200
N fertilizer/Lb. per acre
DM
Yie
ld, T
on
s p
er
Ac
re
Source: OSU Fact Sheet 2587
Late Summer FertilizationHarvest: October 23
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150
N fertilizer/Lb. per acre
Cru
de
Pro
tein
, %
Source: Woods, OSU
Late Summer Fertilized Bermuda: Protein Content
02468
101214
Nov Dec Jan Feb
Sampling Date
Cru
de
Pro
tein
, %
Source: Taliaferro, OSU
Current 2 Year Study:Current 2 Year Study:
Materials and MethodsMaterials and Methods
Objectives:
Determine forage production and quality of late summer fertilized bermuda
Determine supplemental protein required to maximize forage utilization throughout the winter
Management Timeline
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
DeferFertilize
Graze Cool Season or Native
Graze Bermuda
Locations
StillwaterStillwater
HaskellHaskell
Average wt.=1203 lb.Average wt.=1203 lb.
Average BCS=5.5Average BCS=5.5
Pasture Preparation
• Pastures were grazed heavily through August to remove standing forage
• Excess forage at Stillwater was clipped both years
• Last week of August, 50 LB of actual N fertilizer per acre was applied to the pastures.
Grazing Management
• Grazing period– Experiment 1 Nov. 4 to Jan. 22 (77 days)– Experiment 2 Nov. 3 to Feb. 2 (90 days)
• Grazing technique– Stillwater Frontal grazing – Haskell Rotational– 7-14 day forage allowance
Treatments
CONT = no supplement
L = 2 lbs of 12.5% CP supplement
M = 2 lbs of 25% CP supplement
H = 2 lbs of 37.5% CP supplement
Supplement Composition, % of Dry Matter
Treatments L M H
Soyhulls 92.5 60.4 30.6
Soybean
Meal 0 31.9 62.2
Molasses 3.6 3.6 3.6
Dical P 2.5 2.0 1.0
Ca CO3 0.5 1.0 2.0
Feeding
• Cows were individually fed in portable supplement wagons.
• Supplements were prorated to 4 d/wk feeding.
• No harvested forages were fed throughout the experiment.
ResultsResults
Weather, Forage Production and Utilization
Mean Temperature Versus 10-yr Average
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
Tem
per
atu
re
C
Mean Yr. 1 Yr. 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
Mean Yr. 1 Yr. 2
Stillwater Haskell
Mean Precipitation Versus 10-yr Average
0
2
4
6
8
10
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
Pre
cip
itat
ion
, in
ches Mean Yr. 1 Yr. 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
Mean Yr. 1 Yr. 2
Stillwater Haskell
Forage ProductionForage Production
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Exp 1 Exp 2
Lb
s p
er
ac
reStillwater
Haskell
Location effect P < .05
Stock Density and Harvest Efficiency
Exp 1 Exp 2Stw Hsk Stw Hsk
Stocking DensityAU/Acre .73 .57 .40 .85
HarvestEfficiency, % 61 60 65 62
Forage Quality
Forage QualityCrude Protein
0
2
4
68
10
12
14
16
Nov Dec Jan Feb
Cru
de
Pro
tein
, %
of
DM
Exp 1
Exp 2
Cow Req.
Forage QualityDegradable Protein
0
2
4
68
10
12
14
16
Nov Dec Jan Feb
DIP
, %
of
DM
Exp 1
Exp 2
Cow Req.
Cow requirement assumes diet is 50% TDN
Forage QualityDigestibilitya, Exp 1
30
40
50
60
70
Nov Dec Jan Feb
TD
N, %
of
DM
Exp 1
Cow Req.
aIn vitro dry matter disapearanceLinear decline P < .05
Forage QualityDigestibilitya, Exp 2
30
40
50
60
70
Nov Dec Jan Feb
TD
N, %
of
DM
Exp 2
Cow Req.
aIn vitro dry matter disapearanceQuadratic decline P < .05
Animal Performance
Period Wt. ChangeExperiment 1
46 444640
-84
-33-20 -20
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
CONT LOW MED HIGH
Period 1
Period 2Wei
gh
t lb
s.W
eig
ht
lbs.
Period 2 C VS Sup P < .01Period 2 C VS Sup P < .01Period 2 Protein Effect P<.05Period 2 Protein Effect P<.05
Treatment
Overall Wt. ChangeExperiment 1
25.026.013.0
-50.0
-40.0
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
CONT LOW MED HIGH
C VS Sup P < .05C VS Sup P < .05
Wei
gh
t. L
bs.
Wei
gh
t. L
bs.
-44.0-44.0
Treatment
Period Wt. ChangeExperiment 2
4 7 10 13
57 545755
2
2731
16
010203040506070
CONT LOW MED HIGH
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3
Wei
gh
t lb
s.W
eig
ht
lbs.
Periods 2 and 3 C VS Sup P < .01Periods 2 and 3 C VS Sup P < .01
Treatment
Overall Wt. ChangeExperiment 2
83
9791
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
CONT LOW MED HIGH
C VS Sup P < .05C VS Sup P < .05
Wei
gh
t. L
bs.
Wei
gh
t. L
bs.
Treatment
Summary of Animal Performance
• Only during period 2 of Exp. 1 did increased supplemental protein further increase performance over 12.5%.
• In both trials, any supplement improved forage intake and animal performance.
• Supplemental energy was the limiting nutrient as suggested by forage quality data and cow performance.
Comparison of Beef Cow Wintering Systems
Cowboy EconomicsAssumptions
• 120 days summer grazing120 days summer grazing• 100 days fall / winter grazing100 days fall / winter grazing• Forage availabilityForage availability 2800 lb / acre2800 lb / acre• Harvest efficiencyHarvest efficiency 60%60%• Stocking rate Stocking rate 1.6 acres / cow1.6 acres / cow
.63 cows / acre.63 cows / acre• Annual rental rate (bermuda)Annual rental rate (bermuda) $18 / acre$18 / acre• Fall N Fertilizer at 50 lb/acreFall N Fertilizer at 50 lb/acre $12.00$12.00• Stockpiled BermudaStockpiled Bermuda $20.18 / acre$20.18 / acre
Cowboy EconomicsAssumptions, Cont.
• Native pasture rentNative pasture rent $10 / acre$10 / acre• Native stocking rateNative stocking rate 10 acres / cow10 acres / cow• Bermuda hayBermuda hay $50 / ton$50 / ton• 25% cubes25% cubes $130 / ton$130 / ton• 38% cubes38% cubes $170 / ton$170 / ton
Native Pasture + Supplement
3 acres deferred pasture = 3 acres deferred pasture = $27.40$27.402 lb. 38% supplement, 75 d =2 lb. 38% supplement, 75 d = $12.75$12.75Total = Total = $40.15$40.15
“Good” Bermuda Hay OnlyNo Supplement Required
100 d at 25 lb. per day = 100 d at 25 lb. per day = $62.50$62.50Hay feeding waste @ 15%Hay feeding waste @ 15% $ 9.38$ 9.38Total = Total = $71.88$71.88
Hay, Native Grass (50/50) and Supplement
1.5 acres pasture = 1.5 acres pasture = $13.70$13.7012.5 lb. bermuda hay =12.5 lb. bermuda hay = $31.25$31.25Hay feeding waste @ 15%Hay feeding waste @ 15% $ 4.69$ 4.691.0 lb. 38% sup, 75 d =1.0 lb. 38% sup, 75 d = $ 6.38$ 6.38Total = Total = $56.02$56.02
Hay, Native Grass (25/75) and Supplement
2.0 acres pasture = 2.0 acres pasture = $18.27$18.276.25 lb. bermuda hay =6.25 lb. bermuda hay = $15.63$15.63Hay feeding waste @ 15%Hay feeding waste @ 15% $ 2.34$ 2.341.5 lb. 38% sup, 75 d =1.5 lb. 38% sup, 75 d = $ 9.56$ 9.56Total = Total = $45.80$45.80
Stockpiled Bermudagrass + Supplement
1.6 acres pasture = 1.6 acres pasture = $32.29$32.292 lb. 25% supplement, 70 d =2 lb. 25% supplement, 70 d = $ 9.10$ 9.10Total = Total = $41.39$41.39
Summary
• Native pasture and supplement $40.15
• Stockpiled bermudagrass $41.39
• Hay, native pasture 25/75 $45.80
• Hay, native pasture 50/50 $56.02
• Hay only $71.88
Short Term Grazing
• Objective: Utilize stockpiled forage within 60 days (late Oct. through
late Dec.) before moving to different forage base
• Assumptions: Same as 100 day grazing program with following
exceptions:
Harvest efficiency = 65%
Stocking rate = 1.2 cows per acre
= .83 acres per cow
Stockpiled Bermudagrass + Supplement (60 days)
.83 acres per cow = .83 acres per cow = $16.75$16.752 lb. 25% supplement, 30 d =2 lb. 25% supplement, 30 d = $ 3.90$ 3.90Total = Total = $20.65$20.65
Or...$.34 per head per day