+ All Categories
Home > Documents > UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fluency in second ... · Journal of Educational Psychology,...

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fluency in second ... · Journal of Educational Psychology,...

Date post: 02-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: hoangtruc
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fluency in second language writing : the effects of enhanced speed of lexical retrieval Snellings, P.J.F. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Snellings, P. J. F. (2003). Fluency in second language writing : the effects of enhanced speed of lexical retrieval General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. Download date: 14 Jul 2018
Transcript

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Fluency in second language writing : the effects of enhanced speed of lexical retrieval

Snellings, P.J.F.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Snellings, P. J. F. (2003). Fluency in second language writing : the effects of enhanced speed of lexical retrieval

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 14 Jul 2018

REFERENCES

Acock, A. C. (1997). Working with missing values. Family Science Review, 70(1), 76-102. AERA/APA/NCME. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing.

Washington: AERA. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Studies in Writing: Vol.9. Through the models of

writing. G. Rijlaarsdam (Series ed.) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications (5th ed.). New York:

Worth Publishers. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology. A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart

and Winston. Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford

University Press. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A., & Plake, B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity

differences among writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 820-834. Bereiter, C , & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale,

New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A.,

Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 652-666.

Blok, H. (1986). Essay rating by the comparison method. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 11, 169-176.

Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(2), 469-489.

Brown, J. S., McDonald, J. L., Brown, T. L., & Carr, T. H. (1988). Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45-59.

Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing. Generating text in LI and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98.

Cobuild. (2000). Bank of English corpus. Available: http://titania.cobuild.collins.co.uk/about.html.

Cohen, A. L., Torgesen, J. K., & Torgesen, J. L. (1988). Improving speed and accuracy of word recognition in reading disabled children: an evaluation of two computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, //(Fall), 333-341.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cumming, A. (1995). Fostering writing expertise in ESL composition instruction: modeling and evaluation. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language, (pp. 375-397). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Daiute, C. A. (1981). Psycholinguistic foundations of the writing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 5-22.

Damhuis, R. (1993). Immigrant children in infant-class interactions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 305-331.

Damhuis, R., & Schoonen, R. (1993). Taalplan Kleuters: toetsen. Handleiding groep 1, Handleiding groep 2, Toetsen Rl.1 - P2.3 en Resultatenbladen. [Language curriculum kindergarten: tests and instructions]. Rotterdam: Projectbureau.

Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1-18.

95

Das-Smaal, E., Klapwijk, M. J. G., & Van der Leij, A. (1996). Training of perceptual unit processing in children with a reading disability. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 221-250.

De Groot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & Van Hell, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600-629.

DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and Automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, N. C. (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, #(2-3), 103-128.

Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. (1983, 1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first-and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 565-574.

Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors: A study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 437-464.

Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., & Rosebery, A. S. (1985). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training. Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 91-130.

Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 473-492.

Gelderen, A. v. (1997). Elementary students' skills in revising; integrating quantative and qualitative analysis. Written Communication, 14(3), 360-397.

Gelderen, A. v., & Oostdam, R. (in press). Revision of form and meaning in learning to write comprehensible text. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series ed.) & L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, P. Largy, & Y. Rouiller (Volume eds.), Studies in Writing, Volume 13: Revision of Written Language: cognitive and instructional processes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.

Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61-105. Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Muth, D., & Dugan, N. (1982). Writing and revising persuasive

documents: Cognitive demands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 557-567. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. (2001). Processing a second language: late learners'

comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123-141.

Harley, T. A. (1995). The Psychology of Language. Hove: Psychology Press. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.

M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

96

Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-318.

Hox, J. J. (1999). A review of current software for handling missing data. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 62, 123-138.

Huttenlocher, J., & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 486-496.

Jones, D., & Chistensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and student's ability to generate text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 44-49.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.

Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. The American Journal of Psychology, 103, 327-342.

Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell

(Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kellogg, R. T. (1999). Components of working memory in text production. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Esperet (Series eds.) & M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Volume eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 3. The Cognitive Demands of Writing. Processing Capacity and Working Memory in Text Production (pp. 43-61). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension, a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Koda, K. (1996, 1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 450-460.

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.

Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. (2-008). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255-271.

Lea, J., & Levy, C. M. (1999). Working memory as a resource in the writing process. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Esperet (Series eds.) & M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Volume eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 3. The Cognitive Demands of Writing. Processing Capacity and Working Memory in Text Production (pp. 63-82). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1998). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999, 1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences(22), 1-38.

Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. In Psychological Reports (Monograph Supplement 9) (Vol. 3, pp. 635-694).

97

McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299-325.

McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(\), 13-23.

McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 256-266.

Meara, P. (1996, November 1999). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group. Available: http://www.swan.ac.uk/cals/calsres/vlibrary/pm96d.htm.

Meara, P. (1997). QLex 0.2. Available: http://www.swan.ac.uk/cals/calsres/free/free.htm. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn, L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-

103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan. Morton, J. (1979). Word Recognition. In J. Morton & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Psycholinguistic

series: Structures and processes (Vol. 2, pp. 107-156). London: Paul Elek. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach (Vol. 9). New York:

Oxford University Press. Penningroth, S. L., & Rosenberg, S. (1995). Effects of a high information processing load on

the writing process and the story written. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 189-210. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press. Potter, M. C , So, K. F., von Eckardt, B., & Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual

representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23-38.

Poulisse, N. (1997). Language production in Bilinguals. In A. M. B. De Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 201-224). Mahway, New Jersey: LEA.

Ransdell, S., & Levy, C. M. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 93-105). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ransdell, S., & Levy, C. M. (1999). Writing, reading, and speaking memory spans and the importance of resource flexibility. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Esperet (Series eds.) & M. Torrance & G. C. Jeffery (Volume eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 3. The Cognitive Demands of Writing. Processing Capacity and Working Memory in Text Production (pp. 99-113). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C , & Goelman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know (pp. 173-210). New York: Academic Press.

Schmidt, R. (1992, 1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.

Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(\), 1-66.

Schoonen, R., Gelderen, A., Glopper, K. d., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2002). Linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and retrieval speed in LI, L2 and EFL writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series ed.) & S. Ransdell & M.-L.Barbier (Volume eds.), Studies in Writing, Volume 11: New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 101-122). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Segalowitz, N., & Gatbonton, E. (1995). Automaticity and lexical skills in second language fluency: implications for computer assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 5(2-3), 129-149.

98

Segalowitz, N., Poulsen, C, & Komoda, M. (1991, 1991). Lower level components of reading skill in higher level bilinguals: Implications for reading instruction. Aila Review, 8, 15-30.

Shepard, L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. In L. Cronbach (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 19, pp. 405-450).

Snellings, P., Gelderen, A. v., & De Glopper, K. (2002). Lexical Retrieval: an aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced. Language Learning, 52(4), 723-754.

Snellings, P., Gelderen, A. v., & De Glopper, K. (submitted). The effect of enhanced lexical retrieval on L2 writing.

Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What's in a Story: An Approach to Comprehension and Instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 213-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(2), 358-385.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: HarperCollins.

Torrance, M., & Jeffery, G. (1999). Writing processes and cognitive demands. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The Cognitive Demands of Writing. Processing Capacity and Working Memory in Text Production (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Van den Bosch, K., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1990). Flash cards; een vergelijking van toepassingsprocedures [Flashcards: a comparison of practice procedures]. Tijdschrift voor orthopedagogiek, 24, 233-244.

Van den Bosch, K., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1995). Poor readers' decoding skills: Effects of training with limited exposure duration. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 110-125.

Van der Leij, A. (1998). Leesproblemen: Beschrijving, verklaring en aanpak [Reading problems: description, causes and approach]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.

Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212.

Weinert, R. (1995, 1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 180-205.

Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143-154.

Willems, M. M., & Oud-de Glas, M. M. B. (1990). Vocabulaire selectie voor het vreemde­talenonderwijs [Vocabulary list for foreign language education]. Nijmegen: ITS.

Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the LI and L2 mental lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 41-70.

Woutersen, M. (1997). Bilingual word perception., Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

Wray, A., & Perkins, M. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language and Communication, 20(1), 1-28.

Yang, L. (1997). Tracking the acquisition of L2 vocabular: the Keki language experiment. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 125-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

99

Yap, R., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Computergestuurde remediering van dyslexie door het opvoeren van de herkenningssnelheid van subwoordeenheden [A computerized remedial training for dyslexia by enhancing recognition of sublexical units]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 402-419.

Zimmerman, R. (2000). L2 writing: subprocesses, a model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10, 73-99.

100


Recommended