+ All Categories
Home > Documents > V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P...

V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P...

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: natalie-terry
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
22
BNCT IN AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF LUNG METASTASES IN BDIX RATS V.A. Trivillin 1,2 , M.A. Garabalino 1 , L.L. Colombo 2,3,4 , E.C.C. Pozzi 1 , A. Monti Hughes 1 , P Curotto 1 , S Thorp 1 , R.O. Farías 1,2 , S.J. González 1,2 , S. Bortolussi 5 , S. Altieri 5 , M.E. Itoiz 1,6 , R.F. Aromando 6 , D.W. Nigg 7 , A.E. Schwint 1,2 1 Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA); 2 CONICET; 3 Instituto de Oncología Angel H Roffo; 4 Universidad Abierta Interamericana (UAI), Argentina; 5 Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica dell’ Università, Pavia and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Pavia, Italia; 6 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina; 7 Idaho National Laboratory, EE.UU.
Transcript
Page 1: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

BNCT IN AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF LUNG

METASTASES IN BDIX RATS V.A. Trivillin1,2, M.A. Garabalino1, L.L. Colombo2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi1,

A. Monti Hughes1, P Curotto1, S Thorp1, R.O. Farías1,2, S.J. González1,2, S. Bortolussi5, S. Altieri5, M.E. Itoiz1,6, R.F. Aromando6,

D.W. Nigg7, A.E. Schwint1,2

1 Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA); 2CONICET; 3Instituto de Oncología Angel H Roffo; 4 Universidad Abierta Interamericana (UAI), Argentina; 5Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica dell’ Università, Pavia and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Pavia, Italia; 6 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina; 7

Idaho National Laboratory, EE.UU.

Page 2: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

BNCT has been proposed for the treatment of non resectable, diffuse tumors in lung.

The lung is the most frequent (and sometimes unique) site of metastases for several tumor types.

Surgical resection is not an option when metastases are multiple, and chemotherapy is often ineffective. In these cases the short-term mortality rate is 100%.

Page 3: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

The aim of the present study was to perform BNCT studies in an experimental model of lung metastases to assess therapeutic efficacy and potential toxicity.

Page 4: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Based on the work of Bortolussi et al. (ARI 2011), we adapted an experimental model of disseminated lung metastases in rats to perform experimental BNCT studies devoted to optimizing the therapeutic advantage of ex-situ or in-situ BNCT for lung tumors.

This work is part of the multi-institutional project (CNEA, Maimonides Univ., Inst. A. Roffo and Favaloro Foundation) whose primary objective is to study the feasibility of applying BNCT ex-situ to patients with multiple metastases in both lungs.

Page 5: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

At different times post-injection of the tumor cells, the animals were sacrificed, the lungs were removed and fixed in Bouin's solution.

2 Weeks

Between 1 to 6 x 106 DHD/K12/TRb colon

carcinoma cells in 0.5 ml of F10-DMEM were

injected in the jugular vein. The selected tumor

cell load was 3 x 106 cells.

The colon carcinoma cells DHD/K12/TRb were maintained in vitro in culture medium F10-DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.

3 Weeks 4 Weeks 5 Weeks

Experimental Model: different experimental conditions were

tested to optimize the model for biodistribution studies and

for in vivo BNCT studies.

Page 6: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Syngeneic inoculation of colon cancer cells

(DH/DK12/TRb) in BDIX rats in the jugular vein

Development of lung

metastases

Administration of boron

compounds

Irradiation in the RA-3 Nuclear

Reactor

Sacrifice of the group T0

Sacrifice of the experimental

groups

Parameters evaluated:

*Body weight

*Lung mass

*Histology

*Surface with metastatic nodules

(ongoing work)

3 weeks

Diagram BNCT in vivo study

3 h.

2 weeks

The general state of the animals was evaluated in terms of body weight, neurological symptoms and clinical signs throughout the process.

Page 7: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

• Without boron compound administration.• Irradiation at RA-3 Nuclear Reactor. • Sacrificed 5 weeks post-inoculation and 2 post therapy.

Experimental Groups: 1. Control groups

In all groups (except NORMAL), BDIX rats were inoculated with 3 * 106 cells (DH/DK12/TRb).

• Sacrificed 3 weeks post inoculation (pre-treatment).

• Without boron compound administration.• Same manipulation without irradiation.• Sacrificed 5 weeks post inoculation.

Beam only

T0

Sham

• Without inoculation of cancer cells.• Without boron compound administration.• Euthanized to assess normal lung mass.

NORMAL

Page 8: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

• Administration of BPA (46.5 mg 10B/Kg) iv.• Irradiation at RA-3 Nuclear Reactor. • Sacrificed 5 weeks after inoculation and 2 post

therapy.

• Administration of BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) + GB-10 (34.5 mg 10B/Kg) iv.• Irradiation at RA-3 Nuclear Reactor.• Sacrificed 5 weeks after inoculation and 2 post therapy.

BPA-BNCT

LD

(BPA+GB-10) -BNCT

Low dose: minimum absorbed dose to tumor 4 Gy.

High dose: minimum absorbed dose to tumor 8 Gy.

HD

LD

Low dose: minimum absorbed dose to

tumor 4 Gy.

High dose: minimum absorbed dose to tumor 8 Gy.

HD

Experimental Groups: 2. BNCT

groups

In all groups, BDIX rats were inoculated with 3 * 106 cells (DH/DK12/TRb).

Page 9: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Thermal column

Shutter External Shield

Irradiation position

Feasibility of BNCT for experimental lung metastases in the RA-3 Nuclear Reactor

Based on potentially useful administration protocols assayed in previous biodistribution studies (Trivillin et al., 2013), dosimetric calculations were

performed to carry out irradiations at RA-3. It was necessary to design and build a shield to protect the animal body while the lung is exposed through an opening.

Razetti et al. designed, constructed and characterized an adequate thermal neutron shield of lithium carbonate (enriched in lithium-6).

Design, construction and application of a neutron shield for the treatment of diffuse lung cancer in rats using BNCT. A. Razetti, R.O. Farías, S.I. Thorp, V.A. Trivillin, E.C.C. Pozzi, P. Curotto, A.E. Schwint, S.J. González. Applied Radiation and Isotopes (in press).

Diagram of the thermal column of the RA-3

Lithium Carbonate Shield

Page 10: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Restrictions in clinical radiotherapy with photonsOrgan Condition Vol. Crit

(cc)1 fraction

Threshold Gy Max. GyHeart pericarditis < 15 16 22Spinal cord Myelitis <0,35 10 14Skin ulceration <10 23 26Lung (R&L) basic function 1500 7 Lung (R&L) Pneumonitis 1000 7,4 Lung (R&L) <10% 20

  tumor skin others

CBE 3,8 2,5 1,4

RBE 3,2 3,2 3,2

TissueBPA

(46.5 mg 10B /Kg) ip

BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) ip +

GB-10 (34.5 mg 10B/Kg) i.v

Blood 13.7 ± 2.3 (n=5) 31.9 ± 5.9 (n=4)

Metastasis 22.9 ± 7.2 (n=48) 32.8 ± 8.7 (n=32)

Lung 12.2 ± 7.2 (n=9) 28.3 ± 5.6 (n=6)

Spinal cord 5.5 ± 2.4 (n=8) 4.7 ± 2.0 (n=5)

Heart 14.9 ± 3.7 (n=4) 18.9 ± 3.0 (n=3)

Metastasis / Lung 1.9 1.2

Metastasis / Blood 1.7 1.0

DOSIMETRIC CONSIDERATIONS

Trivillin et al., ARI 2014

Page 11: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Prescribed absorbed dose for different protocols.

Absorbed dose (Gy) for BNCT mediated by BPA (46.5 mg 10B/Kg), iv (low dose).

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 4.4 5.8 6.9

Spinal Cord 1.0 1.9 3.3

Lung 3.0 4.6 6.2

Tumor 4.0 6.3 9.0

Absorbed dose (Gy) for BNCT mediated by BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) + GB-10 (34.5 mg 10B/Kg), iv (low dose).

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 4.0 5.3 6.3 Spinal Cord 0.8 1.6 2.6 Lung 3.7 5.9 8.3 Tumor 4.0 6.4 9.3

Absorbed dose (Gy) for BNCT mediated by BPA (46.5 mg 10B/Kg), iv (high dose).

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 8.8 11.6 13.8

Spinal Cord 2.0 3.9 6.6

Lung 6.1 9.1 12.4

Tumor 8.0 12.7 17.9

Absorbed dose (Gy) for BNCT mediated by BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) + GB-10 (34.5 mg 10B/Kg), iv (high dose).

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 8.0 10.7 12.7

Spinal Cord 1.6 3.1 5.1

Lung 7.3 11.8 16.7

Tumor 8.0 12.9 18.7

Page 12: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Parameters evaluated as an indicator of tumor response.

Experimental groupsLung mass

(mean ± SD, N)Lung mass / body mass *

100 (mean ± SD, N)

Normal 1.01 ± 0.20 N=12 0.40 ± 0.05 N=12TO 1.58 ± 0.89 N=10 0.79 ± 0.38 N=10Sham 3.47 ± 1.65 N=13 1.87 ± 0.91 N=13Beam Only LD (Low dose) 2.62 ± 1.03 N=5 1.48 ± 0.64 N=5BPA-BNCT LD 1.01 ± 0.25 N=5 0.56 ± 0.11 N=5(BPA+GB-10)-BNCT LD 1.35 ± 0.51 N=5 0.75 ± 0.30 N=5BNCT LD (pooled) 1.18 ± 0.42 N=10 0.65 ± 0.24 N=10Beam Only HD (High dose) 2.98 ± 1.47 N=6 2.12 ± 1.19 N=6BPA-BNCT HD 1.38 ± 0.22 N=5 0.80 ± 0.16 N=5(BPA+GB-10)-BNCT HD 1.42 ± 0.62 N=4 0.75 ± 0.25 N=4BNCT HD (pooled) 1.39 ± 0.41 N=9 0.78 ± 0.19 N=9

N: Number of rats

Page 13: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Normal

TOSham

Beam Only LD

(Low dose

)

BPA-BNCT LD

(BPA+GB-10)-B

NCT LD

BNCT LD (p

ooled)

Beam Only HD (H

igh dose)

BPA-BNCT HD

(BPA+GB-10)-B

NCT HD

BNCT HD (pooled)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Lung

mas

s/bo

dy m

ass*

100

Percentage of lung mass / body weight for different protocols (mean ± SD).

BNCT corresponds to data pooled for BPA-BNCT and (BPA+GB-10)-BNCTStatistical significance vs. Sham , *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001; Normal vs. T0 **p<0.01

**

****

**

*** ***

Page 14: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Normal

TOSham

Beam Only LD

(Low dose

)

BPA-BNCT LD

(BPA+GB-10)-B

NCT LD

BNCT LD (p

ooled)

Beam Only HD (H

igh dose)

BPA-BNCT HD

(BPA+GB-10)-B

NCT HD

BNCT HD (pooled)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Lung

mas

s (g

r.)

Lung mass for different protocols (mean ± SD).

BNCT corresponds to data pooled for BPA-BNCT and (BPA+GB-10)-BNCTStatistical significance vs. Sham , *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001; Normal vs. T0 **p<0.01

***

**

**

******

Page 15: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Sham (no treatment, 5 weeks post-inoculation)

BNCT (5 weeks post-inoculation, 2 weeks post-treatment)

T0 (pre-treatment, 3 weeks post-inoculation)

Beam only (5 weeks post-inoculation, 2 weeks post-treatment)

Representative examples of the macroscopic appearance of left lung lobes

Page 16: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Representative example of metastatic dissemination in lung (low magnification)

Sham: viable tumor nodule with glandular differentiation

BNCT: tumor nodule exhibiting areas of viable cells, areas of necrosis and/or fibrosis and

pleomorphic cells with radioinduced damage

Representative examples of the microscopic appearance

Page 17: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Discussion and Conclusions BNCT induced a partial, consistent and significant control of

lung metastases, 2 weeks post-irradiation, with no associated toxicity.

The BNCT groups did not exhibit significant differences with T0, revealing that BNCT halted tumor growth.

No clinical, macroscopic or histological changes were observed in normal lung in any of the groups.

One problem so far is that we do not have a system for noninvasive monitoring of lung metastases. That is why we worked with the T0 group, to have a representative value of pretreatment lung mass.

BNCT allows the treatment of all nodules and scattered cells, without the need to know the exact number, distribution or shape (Bortolussi, 2011). Furthermore, the application of BNCT in lung tumors has the advantage that it is not necessary to adjust for the movement of breathing associated with the organ.

Page 18: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by grants from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. GB-10 was kindly provided by Dr. David W. Nigg of Idaho National Laboratory, USA.

Page 19: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Page 20: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Thanks !!!

Page 21: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Prescribed absorbed dose for different protocols for the low dose level.

  Dose (GyW)  Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 6.3 8.5 10.4Spinal Cord 1.1 2.6 4.7Lung 4.2 6.7 9.5Tumor 10.5 18.6 27.7

Absorbed dose

  Dose (Gy)

  Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 4.4 5.8 6.9Spinal Cord 1.0 1.9 3.3Lung 3.0 4.6 6.2Tumor 4.0 6.3 9.0

BPA (46.5 mg 10B/Kg)

  Dose (GyW)

  Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 5.7 7.8 9.5Spinal Cord 0.9 2.0 3.6Lung 5.0 8.5 12.4Tumor 11.1 20.1 30.1

Absorbed dose

  Dose (Gy)

  Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 4.0 5.3 6.3Spinal Cord 0.8 1.6 2.6Lung 3.7 5.9 8.3Tumor 4.0 6.4 9.3

BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) + GB-10 (34,5 mg 10B/Kg)

Page 22: V.A. Trivillin 1,2, M.A. Garabalino 1, L.L. Colombo 2,3,4, E.C.C. Pozzi 1, A. Monti Hughes 1, P Curotto 1, S Thorp 1, R.O. Farías 1,2, S.J. González 1,2,

Dose (GyW)Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 12.6 17.1 20.8Spinal Cord 2.2 5.1 9.4Lung 8.4 13.5 19.1Tumor 20.9 37.2 55.3

Absorbed dose Dose (Gy)

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 8.8 11.6 13.8Spinal Cord 2.0 3.9 6.6Lung 6.1 9.1 12.4Tumor 8.0 12.7 17.9

Dose (GyW)Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 11.3 15.6 19.1Spinal Cord 1.7 4.0 7.3Lung 10.0 17.0 24.8Tumor 22.2 40.2 60.3

Absorbed dose Dose (Gy)

Minimum Mean Maximum

Heart 8.0 10.7 12.7Spinal Cord 1.6 3.1 5.1Lung 7.3 11.8 16.7Tumor 8.0 12.9 18.7

BPA (46.5 mg 10B/Kg)

BPA (31 mg 10B/Kg) +

GB-10 (34,5 mg 10B/Kg)

Prescribed absorbed dose for different protocols for the high dose level.


Recommended