+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery...

Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery...

Date post: 18-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
GALAFLEX USE IN THE COMPLEX PATIENT: MASTOPEXY, AUGMENTATION REVISION AND FAT GRAFTING BREAST PLASTICS CASE REPORT ARCHIVES MARCH 2014 Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery Center 170 W. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46290 Overview A 2012 report from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons states that 51% of cosmetic patients are repeat patients, while 46% of patients have multiple cosmetic procedures at the same time. As the number of patients who have had breast implants continue to increase and age, the need for revisional procedures increases. It is not uncommon for breast revision patients to have multiple surgeries, in part because the previously available techniques have been limited in their ability to provide long-term solutions that prevent recurrent ptosis. Fortunately, surgeons today have more available techniques and devices to be able to provide better solutions for long term outcomes than ever before. Case Background is communication describes the surgical plan and soft tissue reinforcement technique using GalaFLEX in a complex revision performed by Dr. Bruce Van Natta, of Meridian Plastic Surgery. e patient is a healthy 50-year old with a history of two previous breast procedures: she had an augmentation in 1990 and a revision in 2004 for recurrent ptosis and a deflated implant. In early 2014, the patient requested surgery to repair what she described as a “wide space between her breasts”. Dr. Van Natta chose to use GalaFLEX, a naturally derived, long-term resorbable scaffold that is FDA-cleared, to provide soft reinforcement in the patient’s breasts. GalaFLEX is made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and provides a high-strength, porous scaffold for native tissue ingrowth, before it ultimately resorbs in 12-18 months, leaving behind a repair site that is 3-5 times stronger than one without GalaFLEX. e surgical plan for this revision surgery was as follows: Dr. Van Natta is well-versed in the use of GalaFLEX as a transitory scaffold and believed it would help to elevate the breasts and achieve the long-lasting desired result that the previous surgeries, done without the use of a soft tissue reinforcement, did not give her. e surgical goal was to give the patient a small degree of lift through the inframammary mastopexy, maintain the lifted position of the breast mound with reinforcement from GalaFLEX, and enhance the overall shape of the breasts. 2 1 • Crescent and inframammary mastopexies • Implant exchange • Reinforce the capsule with GalaFLEX Perform autologous fat grafting medially in the breasts to build cleavage
Transcript
Page 1: Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery Center 170 W. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46290 Overview A 2012 report from the American

GALAFLEX USE IN THE COMPLEX PATIENT:

MASTOPEXY, AUGMENTATION REVISION AND FAT GRAFTING

BREAST PLASTICSCASE REPORT ARCHIVES MARCH 2014

Dr. Bruce Van Natta

Meridian Plastic Surgery Center170 W. 106th Street

Indianapolis, IN 46290

Overview

A 2012 report from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons states that 51% of cosmetic patients are repeat patients, while 46% of patients have multiple cosmetic procedures at the same time. As the number of patients who have had breast implants continue to increase and age, the need for revisional procedures increases. It is not uncommon for breast revision patients to have multiple surgeries, in part because the previously available techniques have been limited in their ability to provide long-term solutions that prevent recurrent ptosis. Fortunately, surgeons today have more available techniques and devices to be able to provide better solutions for long term outcomes than ever before.

Case Background

�is communication describes the surgical plan and soft tissue reinforcement technique using GalaFLEX in a complex revision performed by Dr. Bruce Van Natta, of Meridian Plastic Surgery. �e patient is a healthy 50-year old with a history of two previous breast procedures: she had an augmentation in 1990 and a revision in 2004 for recurrent ptosis and a de�ated implant. In early 2014, the patient requested surgery to repair what she described as a “wide space between her breasts”. Dr. Van Natta chose to use GalaFLEX, a naturally derived, long-term resorbable sca�old that is FDA-cleared, to provide soft reinforcement in the patient’s breasts. GalaFLEX is made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and provides a high-strength, porous sca�old for native tissue ingrowth, before it ultimately resorbs in 12-18 months, leaving behind a repair site that is 3-5 times stronger than one without GalaFLEX. �e surgical plan for this revision surgery was as follows:

Dr. Van Natta is well-versed in the use of GalaFLEX as a transitory sca�old and believed it would help to elevate the breasts and achieve the long-lasting desired result that the previous surgeries, done without the use of a soft tissue reinforcement, did not give her. �e surgical goal was to give the patient a small degree of lift through the inframammary mastopexy, maintain the lifted position of the breast mound with reinforcement from GalaFLEX, and enhance the overall shape of the breasts.

2

1

• Crescent and inframammary mastopexies• Implant exchange• Reinforce the capsule with GalaFLEX• Perform autologous fat grafting medially in the breasts to build cleavage

Page 2: Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery Center 170 W. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46290 Overview A 2012 report from the American

An inframammary mastopexy is performed by de-epithelializing an ellipse of skin to reduce the nipple to IMF distance. �e patient’s 350cc gel implants are removed and a capsulorrhaphy is performed in the lateral gutter, using 2.0 Ethibond sutures to shape the submuscular pocket.

Crescent Mastopexy

Liposuction / Fat Grafting

1500 cc’s of fat were removed from the patient’s hip rolls and processed in a table top centrifuge. 160 cc’s were placed medially in each breast using the Khouri cannula to build cleavage.

PROCEDURE

A 1-cm wide crescent is de-epithelialized along the superior half of the Nipple-Areolar Complex (NAC). �e top of the areola is undermined and superiorly advanced to meet the top half of the crescent, and closed with absorbable sutures.

Revision

Page 3: Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery Center 170 W. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46290 Overview A 2012 report from the American

A 10 x 20 cm (4”x8”) sheet of GalaFLEX is soaked in an antibiotic solution of Bacitracin/Marcaine, and then cut longitudinally to produce 2 5 x 20 cm (2”x8”) sheets of GalaFLEX. �e GalaFLEX is anchored laterally and inset medially to the chest wall along the IMF using 2.0 interrupted PDS sutures. A 421cc gel implant is placed in the pocket, and the GalaFLEX is �xed to the anterior capsule with 2.0 running Vicryl suture. 2.0 Vicryl sutures are again used to close in the subcutaneous layer, and running 3.0 Monocryl is used to close the skin.

GalaFLEX Placement

PATIENT BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS

Before

After

Page 4: Van Natta Case - Front Cover - Galatea Surgical · Dr. Bruce Van Natta Meridian Plastic Surgery Center 170 W. 106th Street Indianapolis, IN 46290 Overview A 2012 report from the American

®

P/N 400151 Rev. A

References

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2012). Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Retrieved October 2014 from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2012-Plastic-Surgery-Statistics/cosmetic-

procedures-ethnicity.pdf.

2. Deeken, CR, Matthews DB. (2013). “Characterization of the Mechanical Strength, Resorption Properties, and Histo-logic Characteristics of a Fully Absorbable Material (Poly-4 Hydroxybutyrate-PHASIX Mesh) in a Porcine Model of Hernia Repair” ISRN Surgery 2013: 238067.


Recommended