Vapor IntrusionMitigation Methods & StrategiesNEWMOA Workshop on Vapor IntrusionChelmsford, MA – April 12, 2006
David J. Folkes P.E.EnviroGroup Limited
EnviroGroup Limited
Topics
• Overview of Mitigation Approaches• Commercial Buildings• Sub-Slab Depressurization System Design• Performance Testing• Special Issues• References
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup– Long term solution– May be necessary to achieve
10-6 risk levels
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup• Building mitigation (interim)
– Control of vapors entering building
X
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup• Building mitigation (interim)• Institutional controls (interim)
– Prevent buildings
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup• Building mitigation (interim)• Institutional controls (interim)
– Prevent buildings– Require controls in new
buildings
X
EnviroGroup Limited
Overview of Mitigation Approaches
• Soil/Groundwater Cleanup• Building mitigation (interim)• Institutional controls (interim)
– Prevent buildings– Require controls in new
buildings– Restrict occupancy or use
X
EnviroGroup Limited
Building Mitigation Approaches
• Sub-Slab Depressurization• Sub-Membrane Depressurization• Sub-Slab Pressurization• Building Pressurization• Indoor Air Treatment• Passive Barriers
EnviroGroup Limited
WATER TABLEVAPORS
BASEMENT
FANSEAL
SUCTIONPIT
Sub-Slab Depressurization
•Intercepts vapors prior to building entry•Same as “radon” system•Most commonly used method for radon and VOC control•Highly effective in most settings•Up to 99.5%+ reductions•Reduction >90% requires higher QAQC
EnviroGroup Limited
WATER TABLE
VAPORS
FAN
WITH MEMBRANECRAWL SPACE
SEAL
Sub-Membrane Depressurization
•Same concept as SSD•Good foundation seals critical•More susceptible to damage (liner)•Highly effective in most settings•Up to 99.5%+ reductions•Reduction >90% requires higher QAQC
EnviroGroup Limited
Sub-Slab Pressurization
•Positive pressure below slab deflects soil vapors•Not commonly applied•Less effective than SSD in most settings•May be alternative if sub-soils highly permeable
EnviroGroup Limited
Building Pressurization
•Positive pressure in building prevents vapor entry•Not commonly used•Potential high energy cost due to air and heat loss•Less effective than SSD•May be alternative if sub-soils wet or difficult to depressurize
EnviroGroup Limited
Indoor Air Treatment
•Air cleaned after entry into house•Carbon typically used•Not commonly applied•Less effective•Higher costs•O&M intensive•May be alternative to building pressurization if SSD not possible
EnviroGroup Limited
Passive Barriers
?
•Synthetic barrier placed below slab to prevent vapor entry•Typically considered for new construction, but may be retrofitted•Liners vary from thin plastic sheets to thick HDPE liners, spray-on elastomers, etc.•Not recommended without passive venting layer•May have to “go active” to meet objectives•Consider barrier as an enhancement, not replacement for SSD
EnviroGroup Limited
Commercial Buildings
• Larger footprint
• Access for SSD difficult
• Pipe runs challenging
• Horizontal drilling $100 LF
• Asbestos/lead paint
• $5+ per SF
EnviroGroup Limited
Pipe Runs Complicated
EnviroGroup Limited
Sub-Slab Complicated
EnviroGroup Limited
Sub-Slab Complicated
EnviroGroup Limited
SSD Issues
• Vertical suction points– Suction field coverage uncertain
• Sub soil permeability• Presence of cracks, utilities, short circuit field• Presence of grade beams, foundation walls, that
block suction field• Varying slab elevations
– Pipe runs complex in multi-floor buildings
EnviroGroup Limited
SSD Issues
• Horizontal pipes– Expensive $100 linear foot– Difficult to predict suction field– May require varied slot size or density– Utilities (known and unknown), foundations
get in the way– Raised floors on fill present opportunity
EnviroGroup Limited
Industrial Complex Strategies
Vapor Intrusion, Inc.
Limit/restrict use
OSHADemoUnoccupied
HVACDepressurization
EnviroGroup Limited
French Drain Example
• School with many small rooms
• Foundation drain system• SVE blower for UST
remedy• Ambient air O2 levels in
sub-slab• Energy and HVAC
issues
SVE
EnviroGroup Limited
Single Story SSD
•Multiple suction points•Run risers up columns & walls•Manifold on roof to blower•$1-2/sf
EnviroGroup Limited
Depressurize Backfill
• Plume adjacent to building
• Storm sewer backfill used to intercept vapors
EnviroGroup Limited
EG VI-GIS Tracking Tool
• Tracking VI status• Institutional controls• Action levels• Building specific data• Modeling/media data
Vapor Intrusion, Inc.
OSHADemoUnoccupiedLimit/restrict useHVACDepressurization
PCE, TCE10’>GW
Basement2 fOBldg
HVAC, +IC>Status
EnviroGroup Limited
Depressurization System Design
Suction Points• Unfinished location
preferred• Central location best
but often not necessary
• Enlarging hole may enhance suction field
• 1 to 2 suction points usually sufficient
Suction Pit
EnviroGroup Limited
Depressurization System Design
Suction PointsFans• 90 to 150 watts typ• Usually installed
outside• Also attic or garage• Inexpensive to install
and operate
EnviroGroup Limited
Depressurization System Design
Suction PointsFansExhaust Points• above roof line• EPA distance criteria• Consider neighboring
buildings
EnviroGroup Limited
Depressurization System Design
• Aesthetic Issues• Access and
Scheduling• Permits
EnviroGroup Limited
Design Approach
A. Custom Design Approach
1. Visit site and conduct diagnostic tests2. Prepare design drawings3. Install system and test4. Modify system if necessary
EnviroGroup Limited
Design Approach
B. Standard Design Approach
1. Visit site and discuss options with owner2. Install system same visit3. Test system during installation (diagnostics)4. Modify system if necessary (e.g., add suction
points)
EnviroGroup Limited
Design Approach
•More likely to require modifications, particularly in large buildings or where large reductions needed
•Much faster•Suitable for multi-home sites where you can build on experience
Standard Design
•Slower process•Unnecessary for most homes•More expensive
•Modifications less likely•Best for large or complex buildings
Custom Design
DisadvantagesAdvantages
EnviroGroup Limited
Performance Testing
• Smoke Tests– Direction of smoke indicates pressure
gradient (want to be downward)– Very sensitive– Perform at construction joints, penetrations,
and cracks
EnviroGroup Limited
Performance Testing
• Smoke Tests• Pressure Tests
– Confirms downward pressure gradient– Perform at far walls from suction points– More time consuming– Perform with HVAC operating
EnviroGroup Limited
Performance Testing
• Smoke Tests• Pressure Tests• Indoor Air Tests
– More direct measure of performance– Complicated by background sources (unless
finger-print compound present)– May vary by ½ to 1 order of magnitude due to
seasonal fluctuations– Non-extreme weather conditions most likely to
reflect long-term average conditions
EnviroGroup Limited
Special Issues
• High Water Tables • May interfere with SSD• May require drainage
systm• Waters in sumps or
seeping into basements direct source of VOCs
• Seal sumps and depressurize
• Install false floor, seal and depressurize
EnviroGroup Limited
Special Issues
• High Water Tables• Old Buildings
• Dirt floors• Dug-out basements• Degraded slabs• Field-stone
foundation walls• New slabs, grouted
surfaces, liners may be required
EnviroGroup Limited
Special Issues
• High Water Tables• Old Buildings• Explosive
Concentrations
• Make sure well below LEL
• Intrinsically safe fans required if >10% LEL
• Methane may be a by-product of BETX degradation
• Exercise caution!!
EnviroGroup Limited
Special Issues
• High Water Tables• Old Buildings• Explosive
Concentrations• Asbestos and Lead
Paint
• Older buildings may have asbestos and lead-based paint
• Requires proper handling and disposal during retrofits
EnviroGroup Limited
References
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Radon Reduction Techniques for Existing Detached Houses: Technical Guidance (Third Edition) for Active Soil Depressurization Systems. Office Research and Development. EPA/625/R-93/011.
• D.J. Folkes, 2002. “Design, Installation, and Long-Term Effectiveness of Sub-Slab Depressurization Systems”. Presented at the EPA Vapor Intrusion Seminars in San Francisco, 2002 and Dallas and Atlanta, 2003.
• Links to these and other references:
www.envirogroup.com