Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | heshan-de-silva |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 20
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
1/20
Chapter 11
Standard Costs and Variance
Analysis
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
2/20
Presentation Outline
I. Types of Standards
II. Variance Calculations
III. Investigation of Standard Cost Variances
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
3/20
I. Types of Standards
Ideal Standards
Can only be attained
under the bestcircumstances. No
allowance for machine
breakdowns or work
interruptions
Attainable Standards
Tight but attainable
standards. Allows formachine downtime and
employee rest periods.
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
4/20
II. Variance Calculations
A. Material Price Variance
B. Material Price Variance Journal Entry
C. Material Quantity Variance
D. Material Quantity Variance Journal Entry
E. Labor Rate Variance
F. Labor Efficiency Variance
G. Journal Entry for Direct Labor VariancesH. Controllable Overhead Variance
I. Overhead Volume Variance
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
5/20
A. Material Price Variance
MPV = (AP SP) AQ
where:
MPV = Material price variance
AQ = Actual quantity of materials purchased
AP = Actual unit price of materials
SP = Standard unit price of materials
Decision Rule: AP > SP Unfavorable
AP < SP Favorable
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
6/20
B. Material Price Variance
Journal Entry(Recorded at Time of Purchase)
Raw Materials (AQ x SP) XXX
Materials Price Variance [(AP-SP)AQ] XXX or XXX
Accounts Payable (AQ x AP) XXX
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
7/20
C. Material Quantity Variance
MQV = (AQ SQ) SP
where:
MQV = Material quantity variance
SP = Standard unit price of materials
AQ = Actual quantity of materials put into production
SQ = Standard quantity allowed for the output produced
Decision Rule: AQ > SQ Unfavorable
AQ < SQ Favorable
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
8/20
D. Material Quantity Variance JournalEntry(Recorded when materials are put into production)
Work in Process (SQ x SP) XXX
Materials Quantity Variance [(AQ-SQ)SP] XXX or XXX
Raw Materials (AQ x SP) XXX
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
9/20
E. Labor Rate Variance
LRV = (AR SR) AH
where:
LRV = Labor rate variance
AH = Actual labor hours worked
AR = Actual labor rate
SR = Standard labor rate
Decision Rule: AR > SR Unfavorable
AR < SR Favorable
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
10/20
F. Labor Efficiency Variance
LEV = (AH SH) SR
where:
LEV = Labor efficiency variance
SR = Standard labor rate
AH = Actual labor hours worked
SH = Standard hours allowed for the output produced
Decision Rule: AH > SH Unfavorable
AH < SH Favorable
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
11/20
G. Journal Entry for Direct LaborVariances
Work in Process (SH x SR) XXX
Labor Rate Variance [(AR-SR)AH] XXX or XXX
Labor Efficiency Variance [(AH-SH)SR] XXX or XXX
Wages Payable (AH x AR) XXX
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
12/20
H. Controllable Overhead
Variance
Flexible budget
level of overhead
for the actual level
of production
Decision Rule: Actual > Flexible budget Unfavorable
Actual < Flexible budget Favorable
Actual
overhead
Controllableoverhead
variance= -
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
13/20
I. Overhead Volume Variance
Overhead appliedto production using
standard overhead
rate
Decision Rule:
Flexible budget > O/H applied Unfavorable
Flexible budget < O/H applied Favorable
Flexible
budget level
of overhead
for actual
level of
production
Overheadvolume
variance= -
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
14/20
III. Investigation of Standard
Cost VariancesA. Management by Exception
B. Favorable Variances May be
UnfavorableC. Process Improvements and Unfavorable
Variances
D. Variance Evaluation and ExcessProduction
E. Variance Analysis and PerformanceEvaluation
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
15/20
A. Management by Exception
Most managers take a management by
exception approach and investigate only
those variances that they deem to beexceptional.
The absolute dollar value of the variance or
the variance as a percent of actual orstandard cost is often used as the criterion.
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
16/20
B. Favorable Variances May
be UnfavorableThe fact that a variance is favorable does not mean that it
should not be investigated. Indeed, a favorable variance
may be indicative of poor management decisions. Forexample:
A favorable material price variance may be arisen from
purchasing goods of inadequate quality for production.
A favorable overhead volume variance could mean that
excessive inventory has been produced beyond customer
demand.
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
17/20
C. Process Improvements and
Unfavorable Variances
Production workers suggest a change in themanufacturing process so that the standardfor labor time per unit is reduced from 4 to3 hours. If the company does not need toincrease production and keeps the same
number of workers, an unfavorable laborefficiency variance will arise.
(See Illustration on page 397)
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
18/20
D. Variance Evaluation and
Excess ProductionThe Theory of Constraints tells us that production
departments in front of bottleneck departments should
not produce excess work-in-process inventory.Evaluation in terms of standard cost variances could
result in this dysfunctional behavior.
For example, rather than lay off workers, a department
with a temporary demand slump may produce excess
units simply to avoid an unfavorable labor efficiency
variance.
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
19/20
E. Variance Analysis and
Performance EvaluationResponsibility accounting states that
managers should only be held accountable
for variance that they can control.Unfavorable variances do not imply poor
performance. For example, an unfavorable
labor efficiency variance could result fromthe purchase of inferior goods (which by the
way resulted in a favorable material price
variance).
8/3/2019 variance analysis 01
20/20
Summary
Ideal vs. Attainable Standards
Material Variances
Labor Variances
Overhead Variances