+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1%...

Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1%...

Date post: 03-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
48
Page 1 of 48 Institutional Research BUY Price (close) 12 Mar 2012: 78p 52 Week Range: 64p - 163p Price Target: 165p 3-year Target: 247p Vatukoula Gold Mines Profile Vatukoula Gold (AIM: VGM) is in the midst of ramping up production and modernising the historic Emperor Gold mine, situated on Fiji’s largest island, Viti Levu. Now known simply as Vatukoula, the orebody is a low sulphidation epithermal deposit that has been in virtually continuous operation for 80 years. To date, approximately 6.9Moz of gold and over 2Moz of silver has been extracted, with the current JORC compliant Resource standing at 4.3Moz Au, meaning that the mine has in-excess of three decades of production in front of it Share Price Performance Share Capital Shares outstanding (m) 88.6 Market Cap. (£m) 69.1 Free Float 81.3% Significant Shareholders Sprott Asset Management 17.9% Canadian Zinc Corp. 14.2% Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners LLP RESOURCE ANALYST Gaius LL King SALES/CORPORATE Philip Haydn-Slater/Paul Dudley +44 (0) 20 3551 4870 Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC Gold producer trading at 69% discount to our 3-year target BOE cannot QE Au Unhedged profitable producer sensitive to increases in gold price Scalar productive potential many times current rate Valuation at an after-tax NPV12% of 165p per share 3-year valuation of 247p per share It is increasingly probable that the BOE will find inflation an attractive tool to solve the problem of both public and private debt levels (for reasoning see page 41). The resultant inflation will distort the economy in favour of extreme consumption and the hoarding of real assets (e.g. property, oil, equities in perishables, such as Tesco, etc), but in particular, gold and bullion producers. The reality is that the current minority government in the UK will have to face the polls at least once in the midst of an austerity drive. It raises the question does the UK public have the stomach for at least six years of egregious cuts and falling living standards, before even reaching budgetary equilibrium? We believe not. Unlike many of its gold producing peers, VGM does not suffer from a lack of Resources or exploration potential. In fact it may suffer the ignominy, in three to four years’ time, of having 8 to 10Moz Au in Resources, or in-excess of 100 years mine life at the current extraction rate. We believe our valuation of VGM is conservative, based entirely on projected cashflows from its key project, the Emperor/Vatukoula Gold mine. The non-linear financial model incorporates both fixed and variable components, as well as a Stage 2 expansion costing US$270m, large on-going annual underground capital development, and a five-year US$134m exploration programme. Given the enormity of out-going cashflows, we have expanded the number of shares on issue by 24%. Based on modelled cashflows and an issued capital base of 111.02m shares, we initiate with a BUY recommendation and value VGM at an after-tax NPV12% of 165p per share. Our 3-year valuation is based on after-tax cashflows from FY15 onwards, which results in 247p per share. We believe that this project has suffered historically from investor and analyst apathy. A non-mechanised underground operation, it is a form of mining that is increasingly rare, being replaced by open-pit, low-grade operations where metallurgy rather than mining is the key determinant. Despite this, we reiterate that the Vatukoula gold mine represents a large, multi-decade scalar and (we believe) a highly profitable proposition. It is, furthermore, highly sensitive to any increase in gold price (see p. 26). We believe VGM is ideal for the moderately risk tolerant and patient investor who, in time, will be richly rewarded.
Transcript
Page 1: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 1 of 48

Institutional Research

BUY

Price (close) 12 Mar 2012: 78p

52 Week Range: 64p - 163p

Price Target: 165p

3-year Target: 247p

Vatukoula Gold Mines Profile

Vatukoula Gold (AIM: VGM) is in the midst of ramping up production and modernising the historic Emperor Gold mine, situated on Fiji’s largest island, Viti Levu. Now known simply as Vatukoula, the orebody is a low sulphidation epithermal deposit that has been in virtually continuous operation for 80 years. To date, approximately 6.9Moz of gold and over 2Moz of silver has been extracted, with the current JORC compliant Resource standing at 4.3Moz Au, meaning that the mine has in-excess of three decades of production in front of it Share Price Performance

Share Capital

Shares outstanding (m) 88.6 Market Cap. (£m) 69.1 Free Float 81.3% Significant Shareholders

Sprott Asset Management 17.9% Canadian Zinc Corp. 14.2% Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners LLP

RESOURCE ANALYST Gaius LL King

SALES/CORPORATE Philip Haydn-Slater/Paul Dudley +44 (0) 20 3551 4870

Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC

Gold producer trading at 69% discount to our 3-year target

BOE cannot QE Au

Unhedged profitable producer sensitive to increases in gold price

Scalar productive potential many times current rate

Valuation at an after-tax NPV12% of 165p per share

3-year valuation of 247p per share

It is increasingly probable that the BOE will find inflation an attractive tool to solve

the problem of both public and private debt levels (for reasoning see page 41). The

resultant inflation will distort the economy in favour of extreme consumption

and the hoarding of real assets (e.g. property, oil, equities in perishables, such as

Tesco, etc), but in particular, gold and bullion producers. The reality is that the

current minority government in the UK will have to face the polls at least once in the

midst of an austerity drive. It raises the question – does the UK public have the

stomach for at least six years of egregious cuts and falling living standards, before

even reaching budgetary equilibrium? We believe not.

Unlike many of its gold producing peers, VGM does not suffer from a lack of

Resources or exploration potential. In fact it may suffer the ignominy, in three to

four years’ time, of having 8 to 10Moz Au in Resources, or in-excess of 100 years

mine life at the current extraction rate. We believe our valuation of VGM is

conservative, based entirely on projected cashflows from its key project, the

Emperor/Vatukoula Gold mine. The non-linear financial model incorporates both

fixed and variable components, as well as a Stage 2 expansion costing US$270m,

large on-going annual underground capital development, and a five-year US$134m

exploration programme. Given the enormity of out-going cashflows, we have

expanded the number of shares on issue by 24%. Based on modelled cashflows

and an issued capital base of 111.02m shares, we initiate with a BUY

recommendation and value VGM at an after-tax NPV12% of 165p per share. Our

3-year valuation is based on after-tax cashflows from FY15 onwards, which results

in 247p per share.

We believe that this project has suffered historically from investor and analyst

apathy. A non-mechanised underground operation, it is a form of mining that is

increasingly rare, being replaced by open-pit, low-grade operations where

metallurgy rather than mining is the key determinant. Despite this, we reiterate that

the Vatukoula gold mine represents a large, multi-decade scalar and (we believe) a

highly profitable proposition. It is, furthermore, highly sensitive to any increase in

gold price (see p. 26). We believe VGM is ideal for the moderately risk tolerant and

patient investor who, in time, will be richly rewarded.

Page 2: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 2 of 48

Institutional Research

Contents

Financials 3

SWOT Analysis 4

Ownership & Tenure 5

History of the Emperor (Vatukoula) Gold Mine 5

Regional Geology 6

Local Geology 7

Mining Method 8

Exploration, Geology & Mine Planning

Resources 10

In-mine Exploration 12

Near-mine Exploration 13

Indigenous Power Generation

Financial Impact of Reducing Power Costs 15

Proposed Construction of a Biogeneration Plant 15

Localised Geothermal Potential? 17

Mining Assumptions 19

Financial Forecast 21

Financial Valuation 25

Sensitivity Analysis 26

Appendix I – Country Transparency (Fiji)

Background 27

Country Transparency 27

Appendix II – Epithermal Gold Deposit Formation 29

Appendix IV – Company Directors 30

Appendix III – Effective Peak Gold?

Burgeoning Nouveau Riche Demand 30

Constrained Primary Supply Growth 32

Central Bank Demand Haphazard 34

Aftermath of Fiscal Profligacy 36

The Future of Gold 37

Thinking the Unthinkable 39

The British Pound and the Fallacy of Growth 41

Appendix IV – Company Directors 43

Glossary 44

Disclosures 48

Page 3: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 3 of 48

Profit & Loss (USD) 2012F 2013F 2014F

Operating Revenue 35.1 26.1 30.5

Royalties 3.0 3.0 3.3

Invest & other income 0.0 0.0 0.0

EBITDA 24.1 15.0 19.2

Depreciation/Amortisation (5.9) (7.1) 7.6

EBIT 18.3 7.9 26.7

Net Interest 0.5 0.7 1.0

Pre-tax profit 18.7 8.7 27.8

Tax expense 0.0 0.0 0.0

Minorities/Assoc./Prefs 0.0 0.0 0.0

NPAT 18.7 8.7 27.8

Non reoccurring items (5.2) 0.0 0.0

Reported Profit 13.5 8.7 27.8

NPAT add Goodwill & Pref 0.0 0.0 0.0

Adjusted profit 13.5 8.7 27.8

Cashflow Summary (USD) 2012F 2013F 2014F

EBITDA 24.1 15.0 19.2

Working capital changes (0.3) (0.1) (0.0)

Provisions 0.0 0.0 0.0

Other operating 0.0 0.0 0.0

Cashflow pre interest & tax 23.8 14.9 19.2

Net interest 0.5 0.7 1.0

Pref/con, dividends (debt) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Income tax paid 0.0 0.0 0.0

Operating Cashflow 24.3 15.7 20.2

Required capex (9.9) (9.9) (9.9)

Maintainable OCF 14.4 5.7 10.2

Dividends 0.0 0.0 0.0

Pref/con, dividends (equity) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Acquisitions/expansionary capex 0.0 0.0 0.0

Exploration cap./R&D (22.4) (22.4) (22.4)

Disposals 0.0 0.0 0.0

Free cashflow -8.0 -16.7 -12.2

Debt increase/(reduction) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Pref./Conv.Capital (Equity) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Pref./Conv.Capital (Debt) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Equity 0.0 0.0 0.0

Net cash flow -8.0 -16.7 -12.2

Balance Sheet (USD) 2012F 2013F 2014F

Cash & Deposits -2.4 -25.9 -42.3

Trade & other debtors 9.1 9.1 9.1

Inventories 4.1 4.3 4.9

Investments 0.0 0.0 0.0

Prepayments 3.8 3.8 3.8

Other 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total current assets 14.5 -8.6 -24.5

Trade & other debtors 0.0 0.0 0.0

Investments 0.0 0.0 0.0

Assoc. Co. Equity 0.0 0.0 0.0

Inventories 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total property, plant & equipment 22.7 28.4 14.1

Intangibles (Goodwill) 33.3 31.8 30.3

Intangibles (Exploration) 15.9 15.9 15.9

Tax Benefit 0.0 0.0 0.0

Other assets (Int in Gov Sec, Prepays etc) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total non-current assets 71.8 76.1 60.2

Total Assets 86.4 67.5 35.8

Borrowings/pref. debt 0.0 0.0 0.0

Trade & other creditors 5.1 5.1 5.1

Provisions (excl. tax and divs) 1.8 1.8 1.8

Other Provisions (tax ) 0.0 0.0 0.0

Other 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total current liabilities 6.9 6.9 6.9

Borrowings 0.0 0.0 0.0

Preference (Debt Type) 0.1 0.1 0.1

Trade & other creditors 0.0 0.0 0.0

Provisions 1.9 1.9 1.9

Other 10.8 10.8 10.8

Total non-current liabilities 12.8 12.8 12.8

Total liabilities 19.7 19.7 19.7

Shareholder equity 66.7 47.8 16.1

Page 4: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 4 of 48

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

Weaknesses

Established infrastructure – existing processing plant,

hundreds of kilometres of underground development,

numerous shafts, exhaust fans, workshops, and operational

equipment. We estimate it would cost hundreds of millions of

dollars to replicate what the company already has.

Skilled workforce – experienced underground workforces are

now exceedingly rare, especially those with the ability to use

pneumatic air-legs, which takes years of training to gain

proficiency. Although not a modern mining technique, this tool

is a relatively cost-effective, selective extraction method, able

to mine at small widths that are impossible with current

mechanisation technology.

JORC compliant Resource – with over 4Moz’s in Resources,

there are decades of production at current extraction rates.

No hedging or debt.

Single commodity - gold. We believe, however, that the

downside will be mitigated by numerous countries engaging

in “beggar-thy-neighbour” policies.

High fixed-cost base – underground mines have large

costs that are incurred whether producing or not, including

ventilation, dewatering and basic maintenance. By their

very nature, underground mines produce substantially less

tonnage over any given period than their open pit

counterparts, so any costs incurred, spread over less

ounces produced, have the effect of compounding the cost

base.

Reliance on diesel power generation – ultimately a very

expensive source of power and, if our predictions are

correct, are to become increasingly more expensive in the

future as we enter a probable new bull market for oil.

Opportunities

Threats

Extensive exploration potential – following a recent site visit,

we were once again staggered at the amount of in-mine and

near-mine potential that exists. Despite the current JORC

Resource of >4moz Au, we believe that this figure will easily be

doubled in the next three to four years. In addition, we still

believe it likely that a near-surface ore-body will be discovered.

If and when this occurs, it could provide the impetus for the

company to develop it as a separate deposit via a decline, and

replace the current metallurgical plant with another, potentially

doubling current productive capacity.

Increasing underground production profile – the company

will have to organically increase the number of airleg miners

(significant investment and time to train). Given the thin

epithermal nature of the orebody, its variability, and the

relatively gently sloping orientation of the mineralised

flatmakes, it is a deposit that is virtually impossible to be

mechanised mining-wise, without adverse dilution.

Increasing in-house technical expertise - management is

slowly establishing a technical team to improve mine planning

functions.

Effective mine and stope design – although still mining from

the four main sections, management are consolidating

production from disparate regions (in a very large mine)

thereby reducing the substantial travel distances.

Management are establishing localised production centres

utilising a footwall methodology, with stope designs allowing

direct truck loading, thereby minimising double handling.

Renewable/co-generation power source – could

dramatically lower the cost of power to the company, affecting

its fixed cost base, either via cogeneration utilising sugar-cane

feedstock, or potentially using geothermal power from the

nearby caldera.

Nationalisation – despite a number of military coups,

social unrest, and economic difficulties, sovereign risk in

reality is minimal due to the underlying legal structure of the

operation and the critical importance of the Emperor Gold

mine to Fiji’s overall economy.

Loss of key staff – the company relies on a number of very

experienced expatriate staff who are critical to the future on-

going success of the venture, as well as establishing critical

mass where many currently contracted roles could be taken

in-house. Employees of this calibre would be very difficult

to replace in the current market.

Page 5: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 5 of 48

Ownership & Tenure

Vatukoula Gold began its life in August 2000 as River Diamonds, evaluating a number of

diamondiferous Kimberlite dyke systems in Sierra Leone as well as a number of gold

projects in the Para region of Brazil. During 2007, the company acquired a 19% indirect

interest in the Vatukoula Gold Mine for a total consideration of £4.25m. In November that

same year, a conditional agreement to acquire the remaining 81% of the Vatukoula Gold

Mine was entered into, and was consummated in April 2008. The company changed its

name to Vatukoula Gold Mines in August 2008. As at the end of August 2011 the mine

employed 1,150 people, both in Fiji and at its London headquarters.

Figure 1: Vatukoula Corporate Structure

Source: VGM, HD Capital

History of the Emperor (Vatukoula) Gold Mine

Gold was originally found via alluvial deposits within the Nasiv River in the late 19th

Century

in the Vatukoula region. Reputedly, the first recorded discovery of gold near the

Emperor/Vatukoula mine site was made by Baron A. B. de Este in 1872. However, the first

payable gold reef at Vatukoula wasn’t uncovered until November 1932, in the Lololevu

Creek, by William Bothwick, a prospector from Scotland. Following the initial gold rush in

1936, the deposit was held in separate titles by three companies, eventually consolidated in

1956 under Emperor Gold Mines Ltd. Under a number of owners, the mine operated

continuously until 2006, when it was put into care and maintenance. It was acquired by

VGM late in 2008 and reopened soon after. To-date the mine has produced approximately

6.9Moz of Au and 2Moz of Ag.

Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC

(England & Wales)

Viso Gero International Inc

(British Virgin Islands)

River Diamonds Limited (UK)

(England & Wales)

Vatukoula Gold Pty Ltd

(Australia)

Sao Carlos Mineracao Limitada

(Brazil)

Vatukoula Australia Pty Ltd

(Australia)

Vatukoula Finanace Pty Ltd

(Australia)

Koula Mining Company Ltd

(Fiji)

Vatukoula Gold Mines Ltd

(Fiji)

Vatukoula Mine Operations

Page 6: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 6 of 48

Regional Geology

The Fijian archipelago contains over 300 islands

and lies along the edge of the Pacific Ring of

Fire. The Ring of Fire is virtually a continuous

series of oceanic trenches and volcanic arcs/belts

defining the edges of continental plate

movements (see Figure 3), accounting for around

90% of the world’s earthquakes. A theory first

espoused by Alfred Wegener, plate tectonics

holds that the lithosphere (the hard outer layer

~100km thick) moves about on the earth’s

surface, resting on the fluid-like (visco-elastic

solid) asthenosphere, allowing these plates to

undergo motion in different directions. The

movement mechanism is thought to be related to

convection in the earth’s mantle (see Figure 5),

but is presently unproven.

This tectonically active region is defined by an

abundance of faulting, associated with numerous

volcanoes and intrusives, which are genetically

essential for the development of copper and gold

deposits, as well as a range of other metals. The

reason why there is an abundance of world-class

epithermal deposits is the fact that the Pacific

Ring of Fire region has a high geothermal

gradient, resulting from water bearing rock in the

form of subducting oceanic crust, being forced

beneath the adjacent continental crust. As the

oceanic crust decomposes and melts, it creates

hydromagmatic diapirs, releasing entrapped

fluids, allowing them to circulate in convection

cells, leaching metal ions out of the surrounding

rock. These diapirs effectively rise as isothermal

Newtonian fluids, until they reach isostatic

equilibrium. These associated fluids ultimately

cool and the metals that they carry are eventually

deposited in structural and stratigraphic traps.

Viti Levu, the largest Fijian island, is located in a

seismically active area within the Fiji Platform - a

remnant island arc that lies in a diffuse plate

boundary zone between the Pacific and

Australian tectonic plates in the southwest

Pacific. The regional Fijian geology is largely

defined by the collision and the subduction of the

Pacific plate underneath the Australian tectonic

plate (see Figure 2). This plate boundary hosts

major epithermal systems in northern and

eastern Papua New Guinea at Lihir, Porgera, Ok

Tedi and Misima; in the Solomon Islands, at Gold

Ridge; and at Emperor/Vatukoula and Mt Kasi in

Fiji; as well as several similar epithermal gold

deposits on the Coromandel Peninsula in New

Zealand's North Island and Bougainville.

Figure 2: The location and relative direction of movement of tectonic

plates. Fiji is on a diffuse plate boundary zone between the Pacific and

Australian tectonic plates.

Source: US Geological Survey, February 2006, HD Capital

Figure 3: The Pacific Ring of Fire, encompassing a 40,000km long

horseshoe region (high-lighted in red) is strongly coincident with epithermal

gold & copper porphyry styles of mineralisation.

Source: Simon Frazer University, March 2007, HD Capital

Page 7: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 7 of 48

Local Geology

The Vatukoula1 gold deposit is situated in a collapsed caldera within an extinct volcano in

the north-western portion of Viti Levu. The caldera is semi-elliptical in shape with the long

axis trending north-easterly, covering about 23km2 of an undulating topographical basin.

The caldera formed when Tertiary basalts collapsed after prolonged explosions from a

central vent area. The ensuing subsidence (which appears to have been cyclic) was

accompanied by the deposition of andesitic volcanic material, rhythmic tuffs, breccias and

agglomerates, partly under lacustrine conditions. The peripheral basalts were shattered

during the stages of collapse forming a ring fault zone around the caldera.

Figures 4 & 5: In Fiji most of the earthquakes are located off-shore from the two major islands of Vitu Levu and Vanua Levu, with the risk of an earthquake on land being very low, comparable to many parts of Australia (left); and schematic cross section of subduction zone, demonstrating oceanic Australian plate subducting beneath the Pacific plate (right).

Source: Fiji Mineral Resources Department 2011; US Geological Survey, December 2005, HD Capital

The Emperor/Vatukoula2 mine is a low-sulphidation epithermal gold-vein deposit,

associated with alkaline type igneous rocks in a volcanic setting, typical of several other

major gold mines in the southwest Pacific region (e.g. Porgera and Lihir). An important

common genetic feature appears to be the post-caldera collapsing and, in particular, the

formation of a north-westerly shear system transecting the caldera, with flatly dipping

structures within the peripheral basalts resulting from tectonic resettling. Gold

mineralisation is thought to have formed between 3 and 7 million years ago, post-dating

magmatism by approximately 400,000 years. The Emperor/ Vatukoula gold mine is

currently the only significant producing gold operation in Fiji. The vast majority of the gold

mined at Vatukoula is mostly within a two square kilometre fractured basalt block, found

largely in the form of gold in arsenopyrite, with 10 to 50% of the gold in the form of precious

metal tellurides. Typically, the majority of gold mineralisation occurs within steeply dipping

dykes and shears, flat-dipping structures (<45°), known locally as “flatmakes”, resulting

from the intersection of two or more structures referred to as “shatter zones”. An estimated

6.9Moz (8.5Moz pre-mined resources assuming an 81% extraction rate) of gold has been

extracted since mining operations commenced in 1932.

1 Translates as “rock of gold”.

2 Its historical name is listed alongside its current name is being consistent to the fact that virtually all geological literature refers to the

project as the Emperor gold mine, not Vatukoula, which is a regional descriptive.

Vatukoula is located on the edge of a collapsed caldera/volcano.

Approximately 6.9Moz Au has been mined from the Emperor/ Vatukoula Gold deposit since operations commenced in 1932.

Page 8: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 8 of 48

Mining Method

The greatest challenge with most epithermal vein deposits is the fact that mineralisation is

thin and highly variable. At Vatukoula, a width typically varies between 10 and 50cm.

Figures 6 & 7: Typical quartz-rich low sulphidation telluride epithermal styled mineralisation near Philips shaft. Ore-bearing

hydrothermal fluids interact and alter the surrounding host rock. As a result, fluids become both dilutive and neutralised,

precipitating silica within veins as quartz (left); and a 4 by 3.5 metre drive/drift developed along the ore zone near Smith

Shaft, with oxidised sulphide mineralisation dipping at a 25 degree angle from the top left into the right hand wall. The

dimensions of the mined stopes above and below the drive are developed by pneumatic airleg at a little over a 1.2metres

true-width, resulting in significantly less dilution than if done by other mining methods (right).

Source: HD Capital

Figures 8 & 9: Example of a “flatmake” bifurcating into two separate ore zones, illustrating the irregular nature of the

mineralisation over very short distances (left); and arsenopyrite-rich sulphide rich material, visible small relic voids known

as vugs (near red pencil), is a typical feature associated with epithermal deposits. Banding is the result of precipitating

silica from hydrothermal fluids associated with the caldera sealing the fissure closed, until the build-up of hydrostatic

pressure ruptures the seal. After time, passive conditions return with quartz precipitating and the seal closes again (right)

Source: HD Capital

Page 9: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 9 of 48

Being an underground operation, Vatukoula is accessed by a shaft at a

series of levels. Historically, each level was typically set 100 feet apart

continuing the entire depth extent of the ore-body(s). Levels are typically

developed in the footwall (often dependant on the most competent rock)

parallel to the orebody. At regular intervals, orthogonal adits are

developed to intersect the orebody, then drives (or “drifts” – see Figure

10) would be developed along strike of mineralisation on a specific level.

The workings on successive levels are then connected by raises and old

ore workings, which are critical for through-mine ventilation.

The dominant mining method employed at Vatukoula is a non-

mechanised long-wall method using a pneumatic airleg, a method

commonly utilised in South Africa mining in the Witwatersrand. Holes are

drilled into the rock at regular intervals in differing patterns dependent on

the mine design. The holes are loaded with ANFO (ammonium nitrate –

NH4NO3) using electric detonators and fired at specific and

predetermined times of the day. The residual broken material is scraped

out via an electric winch. This technique should allow a higher extraction

rate (aiming for in-excess of 80%) than the simple “room and pillar”

method, where a significant portion (often 50%) of the ore-body will be

left behind for ground support (in addition to wooden supports).

Previously, management were primarily concentrating on establishing

cashflows to maintain ramp-up of a new operation and recover from a

one-in-a-hundred year rainfall event in 2009, which flooded the mine to

the 15th

level. A major development since the author’s last site visit

several years ago, is the company’s single stope campaign.

Management is now establishing several large long-wall panels with draw points for loading

straight onto trucks. This will allow the miners to concentrate on several main working

stopes, one likely to be located near Philip’s Shaft, the other at Smith’s, rather than

disparate working faces throughout the mine. Not only should it result in higher

underground output, there will also be increased efficiencies associated with less materials

handling - possibly at the risk of having greater grade fluctuations due to less working

faces.

Figure 10: Simplified schematic for underground

entries and workings.

Source: McGraw-Hill (2005)

Parallels with Medusa Mining?

Unfortunately for Vatukoula, it has a method of mining operation that many investors (and analysts) are unfamiliar with As a result, we believe, many have shied away from this excellent investment story. It is our opinion that the Vatukoula mine cannot be mechanised (primarily due to the width and orientation of the orebody) because the resultant dilution would make the whole operation uneconomic. We believe that the company has significant parallels with Medusa Mining Ltd (ASX: MML) which has, since 2008, had a meteoric rise in its share price and public perception.

MML’s key asset is the Co-O mine, which is developed on a series of low sulphide, epithermal quartz veins, in Mindanao, the Philippines. Like the Vatukoula, the Co-O mine has a substantial history. It was originally developed by Musselbrook Energy and Mines, controlled by the late media tycoon, Kerry Packer. The plant was built by BHP in 1988, and ore was extracted via the use of mechanised jumbos. The machinery used was too large for the orebody dimensions, resulting in excessive dilution. After extracting only 60koz Au coupled with mounting losses, Packer abandoned the operation in 1992. When the mine re-opened, the majority of production was via hand-held methods (i.e. hammer and chisel), which made production slow and manually intensive. Massive hard veins composed primarily of quartz (often with grades greater than 30g/t) were avoided, being too difficult to extract. Like Vatukoula, ore production is now predominantly via pneumatic air-leg, which has considerably enhanced mining rates. In addition, scheduled refurbishments and

increases in mill capacity took significantly longer than management had originally predicted.

There are, of course, obvious fundamental differences. (a) Unlike the Co-O mine, Vatukoula, geologically speaking, is at least an order of magnitude greater in geological prospectivity. It has the very real prospect, in three to four years time, of having 8-10Moz in resources (and 100 years of production in front of it) without an obvious plan to increase production; and (b) because Vatukoula is also half the grade of the Co-O mine, it is also naturally a higher-cost producer. However, in both cases, any additional increase in underground productive capacity will have to be organic, likely via pneumatic air-leg, which is a skill that takes a number of years for a miner to master. It took a long time before the investment community woke up to MML’s promise; we believe that it will also take time to appreciate VGM’s potential.

Management intend to increase underground production at the expense of surface oxide material.

Page 10: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 10 of 48

Exploration, Geology & Mine Planning

Resources

Unlike many gold deposits, Vatukoula does not suffer a lack of resources or prospectivity.

In fact, the operation could suffer the ignominy in five years time of having 8-10Moz in

resources without an obvious plan to increase production. The largest bottle-neck to

increasing production at Vatukoula is the 650ktpa crushing capacity of the metallurgical

plant. Although working extremely well, the current mill is approaching the term of its

natural life, which could be extended almost indefinitely with maintenance. There is,

however, the opportunity to replace it with increased capacity plant, co-incident with

increased underground production. With the current mine resource standing at 4.3Moz

(see Table 1), given the aerial extent between the lowest developed level accessed by

Philip’s Shaft and the interpreted edge of the caldera (where the geothermal gradient would

be too hot to humanly work – although there are economic engineering solutions around

this, see p.17), we believe there to be substantial additional potential (conservatively 8 to

10Moz), meaning that the total mineralised system is therefore >20Moz3.

Table 2: Vatukoula JORC-compliant Mineral Resource estimate.

Source: VGM AR 2011, HD Capital

3 Current Resource of 4.3Moz, plus historical production of 6.9Moz (8.5Moz pre-mined resources assuming an 81% extraction rate).

Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t Au) Contained

Gold (Moz)

Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t Au) Contained

Gold (Moz)

Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t Au) Contained

Gold (Moz)

UNDERGROUND 7.4 6.0 1.4 4.4 8.8 1.3 4.6 9.7 1.5

TOTAL MINERAL RESOURCE 16.4 6.5 4.2

MEASURED INDICATED INFERRED

Figure 11: Pneumatic airleg allows miners to extract ore from narrow widths at a relatively flat orientation that would be

impossible via mechanisation. True width is approximately 1.1m. Extremely geotechnically stable, small excavations within

competent basalt displaying high uniaxial compressive strength, with additional timber ground support (see foreground).

Source: VGM, HD Capital

There was considerable prior underinvestment into the Vatukoula Gold mine for a substantial period of time which has to be rectified.

Page 11: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 11 of 48

Epithermal deposits, by their very nature, not only display highly irregular gold distribution

profiles, but gold bearing veins are also highly variable, ranging from 1cm to as much as

1.2m (averaging 20-30cm) in width over relatively short distances. This is evidenced by a

72% variation in annualised gold grades at the Emperor/Vatukoula Gold Mine (from just

5.5g/t to just under 9.5g/t Au – see Figure 24), despite largely identical mining methods.

Although the identification of mineralised zones is easily accomplished (and typically those

zones display good continuity), what is difficult is that any grade and thickness calculation

may not be representative, which cannot necessarily be resolved cost effectively by greater

drillhole density. This underlies one of the challenges at Vatukoula, accurately calculating

Reserves and Resources. Zones that were thought to be marginally economic have

proven to be substantially higher-grade, and vice versa. Despite management’s best

efforts, we believe they will inevitably resort to inadvertently absorbing good grade with the

poor; a problem unlikely to change, despite greater efforts by the company on detailed

short-term and long-term mine planning.

Figure 12: The Vatukoula orebody model consists of ten main discrete relatively flat-dipping planar structures (known

locally as “flatmakes”) overlapping each other; the Prince William, Dolphin Prince, Dolphin, 166N, TTN, R1, Matnagata,

Matnagata West, Matnagata East, and Matnagata Northeast.

Source: VGM, HD Capital

Due to global personnel shortages in the requisite fields, the company historically

outsourced many non day-to-day geological functions, costing in-excess of US$1.4m per

annum. Management have subsequently recruited several key personnel and will look to

internalise functions such as Reserve/Resource calculations, to reduce costs. More

importantly, once this intellectual capital is internalised, detailed mine planning functions

Epithermal deposits typically display substantial grade and thickness variations. However, given the extensive history of this deposit, it is unlikely that global mine characteristics will change dramatically going forward. The company is still in the midst of building its onsite team.

Page 12: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 12 of 48

can then take place. For example, at present mine engineers rely on annualised computer

tables, based on modelled Resource calculations detailing expected Reserve grades at

level and block intervals, while onsite management are unable to update forecasts

incorporating real-time information supplied by the mine geologists. Inevitably this will

change in time as additional people are incorporated into the technical team.

In-mine Exploration

Management have been aware for some considerable time that the previous two operators

(Durban Roodeport Deep & Western Mining Corp) of the Emperor/Vatukoula Gold mine

were “remiss” in their geological and capital-development investment, possibly due to the

prevalent low gold price. The lack of detailed geological information is a critical component

for management to make informed decisions.

Figure 13: Diagram demonstrating the change in orientation between the Prince William (Orange) and the Matnagata

surface (grey) overlain by underground drive development. Three footwall drillholes (white lines), to test ore-surface

replication, are planned before the development (in case the decline intersects additional orebodies) of a proposed

internal decline (white circular corkscrew), to access the down-dip continuation of mineralisation of the Dolphin, Prince

and Prince William surfaces.

Source: VGM, HD Capital

Although elsewhere universally adopted in all major new mining developments, it is only in

the past year the Vatukoula mine has been effectively modelled graphically. This is a

powerful tool for mine geologists, not only to be able to manipulate data, but also to plot

holes and their intersections in real-time. Historically, drillholes were plotted by drafts-

people on cross sections and then interpreted by the geologist. As well as being time

consuming, the successful interpretation of complex structural surfaces was often

dependent on the individual skill and competency of the geologist involved. The adoption

of this modern graphical technique virtually eliminates individual perception differences,

We believe that the pre-mine total gold mineralisation system at Vatukoula is considerably greater than 20Moz Au.

Page 13: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 13 of 48

with the enhanced ability to manipulate the image from any angle. We expect that as more

drill and mapping information is incorporated into this tool, it could be instrumental in

determining the existence of as yet overlooked ore surfaces. The economic benefits to in-

mine exploration include:

Increase in the number of ounces per vertical metre developed; and

Any resultant discovery would likely be close to existing infrastructure and ventilation,

meaning additional development would be minimal; and

Ore haulage distances will likely be substantially less, as will development

requirements.

To rectify the situation and update resources, during 1Q10 the company purchased an

additional four underground drill rigs, bringing the total number to nine. In time, with

surface and underground exploration programmes, we would expect regular discoveries

similar in nature to the recent Baron d’Este finding. Located approximately 300 and 700m

below surface (between levels 11 and 23), some 300m from existing workings, it is the first

discovery of a new high grade ore zone at Vatukoula since the discovery of the Prince

William ore zone in the 1980’s. The most significant composite intersections included

0.46m @ 125g/t Au and 2.86m @ 34g/t Au, part of up to four structures, three of which are

sub-vertical, and are open along strike and down dip.

Near-mine Exploration

We cannot emphasise enough what an incredibly promising prospect we believe Vatukoula

to be, especially for orebody extensions regionally. There are reputedly in excess of 4,500

drillholes outside the immediate mine environment. However, as Figure 14 demonstrates,

the vast majority of these holes are located in close proximity to existing mine workings.

Figures 14 & 15: Modelled Vatukoula gold mine with drill-hole traces. Note how little drilling exists for much of the Prince William orebody (left); and a simplified westerly x-section illustrating the geographical relationship between various orebodies. In addition, each of these surfaces is interconnect by steeply dipping dykes and shears, with the intersection of two or more structures referred to as “shatter zones” (right).

Source: VGM, HD Capital

There are good economic reasons to conduct in-mine exploration. Management are investing heavily into the long-term future of the mine, via underground and surface drilling, and substantial underground capital development. The exploration potential around the existing Emperor/Vatukoula Gold mine is enormous.

Page 14: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 14 of 48

In the late 1990’s the WMC4 board (then owners) commissioned an internal study on the

cost benefit analysis of exploration across all its divisions. Among other things, it found that

given the long lead times (sometimes decades) typically associated with getting a mine into

operation, exploration costs (although only between three and five percent of total

development costs in nominal terms) equated to between 15 and 17 percent of real costs,

once time value had been incorporated. Unfortunately, WMC upper management drew the

wrong conclusions from this cost benefit analysis, deciding to restrict general exploration

and development expenditure, in a vain attempt to develop a geological equivalent to the

modus operandi “just-in-time”. The unintended consequence of this strategy was the

continual inability of operations management to justify expenditure, meant that production

eventually caught up with capital development, resulting in production bottle-necks.

Given the large Resources base at Emperor Gold mine at any particular point in time,

coupled with the day-to-day production imperative to keeping the mill running at full

capacity, it would be very difficult to mount a geological argument for additional funds to

extend the resource base significantly, let alone funds for regional exploration. That if

something substantial were to be discovered, any cashflows would be so far into the future,

it would likely render any economic benefit to be almost negligible without considerable

expenditure.

Figure 16: Resource model in plan projection, overlain with mine grid. Each block is approximately

1km square. Blue = mined out regions and Measured Resources. Teal Green = Indicated

Resources. Yellow-Green = Inferred resource, see planned (blue trace lines) surface drill-holes to

the east and west, primarily targeting Inferred Resources. Red = unclassified resource (has some

drilling but not sufficient for a resource classification.

Source: VGM, HD Capital

4 After the resignation of geologist Roy Woodall, the international mining house Western Mining (WMC) did not have a single sitting

board member with any formal mining training (engineering or geological) or experience (they did have the token female biologist).

Mining by its very nature requires substantial and sustained upfront development. If neglected for a while, it will take a considerable period of time before rectified.

Page 15: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 15 of 48

Indigenous Power Generation

Financial Impact of Reducing Power Costs

Fiji has no indigenous source of fossil fuels for its power generation needs; hence, as a

country, it is heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels for its industrial, domestic, transport

and power generation. As a result of the relative remoteness of the Vatukoula operation,

power is obtained via on-site diesel generators, making up approximately 18 to 22

percent (depending on oil price and production levels) of C1 production costs. This, of

course, makes the operation particularly susceptible to future vagaries in the oil price, and

is why management are keen to diversify its generation source, potentially utilising a

biogeneration facility, which could halve the electricity tariff. This would increase

our NPV valuation by approximately 25% (see Sensitivity Analysis – p. 26) by reducing

cash-costs of US$880/oz (in real terms, post FY16) to around US$723/oz – a material

difference.

Proposed Construction of a Biogeneration Plant

According to recent media reports5, VGM has recently met with Fiji’s current Prime Minister

to discuss the construction of a new cogeneration plant at the Rarawai Sugar Mill. This

follows the signing of an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) several years ago

between VGM and the Fijian Super Corporation (FSC) to purchase energy from the then

proposed Rarawai Mill Bagasse cogeneration project. Although FSC reputedly has

cashflow problems, recent discussions indicate that the project will get some level of

government support, with project capex estimated to be approximately US$90m (public

est.) to 120m (company est.).

Direct benefits to FSC will include reducing electricity costs, as well as providing an end

use for cane crushing waste. Sugar cane has one of the highest photosynthetic

bioconversion efficiencies in the plant kingdom, able (under optimal conditions) to fix

around 55 tonnes of dry matter per hectare of land annually (on a single crop basis). The

Fijian economy is heavily reliant on sugar as an export commodity, the processing of which,

results in the generation of a substantial amount of organic waste material (bagasse)6.

Bagasse is often used as a primary fuel source for sugar mills; when burned in high

quantities produces sufficient thermal energy to supply all the mill’s needs, typically with

substantial energy to spare. In a cogeneration plant, the use of a fuel source provides both

thermal energy (steam), which is utilised in the mill, and electricity, the excess of which is

typically sold on to the consumer via the regional electricity grid.

In addition to the obvious tariff advantages for VGM, other benefits for Fiji as a whole

regarding cogeneration include:

Renewable and indigenous energy source;

The relatively low capital-cost of the project;

CO2 emissions are equal to the amount of CO2 that the sugarcane plant absorbed

from the atmosphere during its growth phase. Effectively making the cogeneration

process entirely greenhouse gas neutral;

The ash can be used as a soil conditioner in landscaping work, or be returned to cane

farms to supplement fertilisers;

5 Fijilive, December 6

th, 2011 “PM shows support to VGM on expansion plans” (http://fijilive.com/news/2011/12/06/38478.Fijilive)

6 Despite high moisture contents (typically 40 to 50%), for electricity production bagasse is typically stored under moist conditions; with a

mild exothermic reaction from the degradation of residual sugars providing moderate drying.

Reduction in power costs could have a dramatic impact on the fixed-cost component of mine production costs. VGM are dealing directly with Fiji’s Prime Minister to forward the biogeneration option as renewable, low-risk, low capex solution. Cogeneration is a renewable indigenous energy source.

Page 16: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 16 of 48

Cogeneration makes better use of waste biomass, which would otherwise be dumped

or burnt as waste; and

This appears to be a project with benefits for Fiji (balance of payments) and

Vatukoula.

Figures 17 & 18: One tonne of sugarcane produces approximately 250kg of wet waste plant material, known as bagasse (left); a 140MW facility in Florida utilises bagasse (brown stockpiles) and urban wood waste to generate enough electrical power and steam for its milling and refining operations, plus renewable electricity for 60,000 homes. Significant volumes of bagasse are stored at the end of the sugarcane grinding season, typically mid-October to mid-March (right).

Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (US), Florida Crystals Corp., HD Capital

Potential challenges for the project include:

Seasonality of the feedstock given there is only one cane growing season per annum

in Fiji. It is presently envisaged that sugar cane will provide approximately nine

months feedstock, with locally sourced tropical wood burnt providing the balance;

Timber plantation will have to be established, meaning there will be a lag time (>15

years) before it reaches full yield, meaning an alternate bio-source will have to be

found in the interim; and

This power cannot yet be transported to site, as 18km of power lines need to be

evaluated for upgrading or replacement.

A single cane growing season means that the bagasse will need to be supplemented for several months a year by another fuel source, most likely tropical wood.

Page 17: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 17 of 48

Localised Geothermal Potential?

Anyone who has had the privilege of going underground at Vatukoula will attest to how

indecently high the ambient temperature is. In-mine water temperatures of over 58

degrees Celsius have been recorded. The Vatukoula deposit lies on the edge of a

relatively recent (in geological time) thermally hot caldera. Historically, at various times,

working stopes (at the bottom of Philips Shaft) have crossed the caldera boundary7.

Because temperatures were too hot for continued human occupation, men would reputedly

work in 15 minute shifts in the stope then spend 15 minutes in a nearby fridge to lower the

body’s internal temperature, whilst a second crew would emerge to take their place, and

vice versa. It raises the question: is geothermal power a potential generation option at (or

nearby) Vatukoula?

Geothermal power uses the earth’s latent heat, by tapping regions of high temperatures to

generate electrical power. As a technique for power generation, it has been used since

1904 in Larderello, Italy, and is now utilised in over 24 countries around the world, five of

which use geothermal power to produce more than 15 percent of their total electricity power

generation. Total global installed geothermal power generation is now approaching

11,000MW, which is enough to meet the annual needs of over 110 million people.

Figures 19 & 20: Binary cycle power plants can accept fluid temperatures much lower than traditional systems, using either Organic Rankine, Kalina Cycle or Granex systems. Moderately hot geothermal water is passed by a secondary fluid with a much lower boiling point, resulting in the secondary fluid to flash vaporise, thus driving the turbines. Binary geothermal systems are the most common type of geothermal electricity plant being constructed today (left); and an example of a 192.5MW geothermal plant in the municipality of Valencia, Negros Oriental; situated in a similar topographic setting as Vatukoula (right).

Source: University of Queensland, Energy Development Corp, HD Capital

The dominant lithology hosting the gold mineralisation at Vatukoula is basalt, and underlies

the seven kilometre diameter caldera and somma, containing volcanic sediments

(pyroclastic flows and tuffs) which are, in turn, intruded by andesites and biotite-quartz with

andesites at its centre. Caldera sediments display monocline, inclining from the rim to the

7 Using the updated Resource/Reserve on Vatukoula by AMC Consultants Pty Ltd (“AMC”) in 2010, we note that the Resource

calculation used the interpreted edge of the caldera as a boundary, despite valid high-grade holes below. We assume that this was done on the simple basis that temperatures would be too high for extraction under current infrastructure provisions.

There appears to be significant regional geothermal prospectivity

Page 18: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 18 of 48

centre. This is consistent with its interpreted collapsed caldera, resulting in substantial

fracture systems, in which some andesite intrusives were emplaced. Hot water inflows into

the mine appear to be largely related to NE-SW fracture systems. Regional magnetics,

demonstrating possible conjugate sets of accommodation structures running NW-SE, also

appear to contain andesite intrusives.

Although hot water is clearly emanating from the mine, primarily using these regional

fracture systems, it is unlikely that the geothermal potential will be in close proximity to the

mine because, by definition, epithermal deposits typically occur some distance from the

heat source. However, the mineralogy may give a clue as to where a potential heat source

could exist. At Philip’s shaft, mineralisation is predominantly telluride based - only

accounting for around 15% of the entire mineralisation of the mine, with the rest associated

with sulphides. Telluride mineralisation is indicative of a mesothermal (200-300oC) gold

depositional environment. Mineralisation then becomes (gradational) more typical

epithermal (80-200oC) associated with arsenopyrite. Assuming that there is a single

mineralisation event (as opposed to a distal and medial event) consisting of a number of

pulses, it would imply that this is evidence of a decreasing temperature regime with

increasing distance from the heat source. Although only a theory, it could provide a

possible vector.

The geothermal industry globally, is in the midst of a revolution. Recent developments

(predominantly from the oil industry) in drilling technologies, fracking (fracturing rocks at

depth to create porosity) and hole hydration techniques, coupled with technological

innovations that allow more efficient heat exchange in steam turbines, have transformed

the modern geothermal sector. The potential (if any?) will be highly dependent on localised

geothermal gradient, and the type of binary system in operation. From discussions with

industry participants, it appears a temperature of 150 degrees Celsius is an optimal

minimum, although this target could be significantly lowered dependant on recent binary-

power developments.

Energy source unlikely to be next to the mine. Geothermal power globally is under-going a technical revolution.

Page 19: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 19 of 48

Mining Assumptions

The gold price assumptions used in this model are not dissimilar to those of other

investment houses. Given the general uncertainty around the future price of gold, we have

not attempted to try to predict the future. However, we point out that our long-term price of

US$1,250oz Au is >25% lower than the current spot price. Although gold’s last peak in

1980 (in relative terms, see Figure 36) disproves the notion that the yellow metal is

infallible, on balance, we believe it is in structural deficit and is less susceptible to central

Bank influence in the short to medium term than the equivalent fiat currencies, including the

USD and Euro. If a major inflationary period is instigated (collectively), then gold will be

seen by investors as an asset class that will provide a relative store of value in turbulent

times. This is especially important in an economic environment where countries appear to

be actively using “beggar-thy-neighbour” policies to achieve economic advantage.

Table 2: Gold, Silver and Exchange-rate Assumptions.

Source: HD Capital

Forecasting long-term exchange rates is quite problematic. For instance, we use the long-

term USD/GBP exchange-rate of 0.60, not the spot rate of 0.63. Many of the fiscal failings

of the UK apply equally to the US. The US is currently in the midst of a major inflationary

stimulus program, but we believe it could suffer deflationary issues similar to that being

experienced in Europe at present, once taxes and stimulus cuts are enacted after the next

US Presidential Election8, 6

th November 2012.

Table 3: Mine Physicals Assumptions.

Source: HD Capital

Our production assumptions largely follow company guidance. However, we believe that

our valuation had to include potential production upside, given that the operation (at current

production rates) has at least four to eight decades lifespan. We have included a scenario

increasing the underground and mill capacity by 53% to approximately 1Mt pa, which we

have termed “Stage 2”. It would encompass deepening the depth of Philip’s shaft to

1,200m and the construction of a completely new mill. Although only a relatively modest

increase above existing production capacity of 650kt pa, we assume entirely underground

production, and take into account current bottle necks.

8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Li0no7O9zmE

Year End 31 October 2012F 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F

Gold Price (US$/oz) 1600 1500 1400 1250 1250 1250

Silver Price (US$/oz) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0

FJD/USD 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53

USD/GBP 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60

AUD/USD 1.06 1.00 0.92 0.86 0.82 0.82

Year End 31 October 2012F 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F

Mined Tonnages (Phillips, Smiths shafts + slimes) (000t) 321.9 336.9 391.9 471.9 501.9 501.9

Mined Tonnages (surface oxide material) (000t) 150.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Underground mined grades (g/t) 6.7 7.1 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.5

Average underground metallurgical recoveries (%) 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%

Average surface grade (g/t) 1.40 1.40 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75

Average surface metallurgical recoveries (%) 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%

Page 20: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 20 of 48

Table 4: Financial Model Assumptions

Source: HD Capital

Due to the US$134m exploration budget over the next five years (see Table 4), we have

assumed a 70/30 debt to equity ratio for financing Stage 2 and have assumed that an

additional 22m shares will be issued, all of which has been incorporated into our valuation.

Importantly, Stage 2 is not dependent on further greenfields/brownfields discoveries.

However, based on our understanding of geological prospectivity, we have previously

hypothesised that there is a strong possibility of a yet to be discovered deposit. Depending

on its proximity, if such a scenario were to unfold it would likely be treated as an entirely

separate development (but possibly sharing the single mill).

• Gold production rate expected to peak at 101koz Au pa for Stage 1 in 1H16

• No loss of production between Stages 1 and 2 - with increase in production ramping up 2H18 after Stage 2 completion

• Based on historical records we have assumed a long-term mine grade of 7.5g/t Au

• Assumed a US$134m spent on in-mine and near-mine exploration between 2012 and 2017, with 30% expensed

immediately, the rest capitalised

• Average metallurgical recovery of 85% for underground sulphide/telluride material

• Average metallurgical recovery of 70% for oxide material

• Average metallurgical recovery of 60% for slimes

• Stage 2 mill/mine expansion from 1H15 to 1H18, increasing plant capacity 53% from 650ktpa to 1Mtpa

• Assumed that mining method remains the same - therefore have continually applied current cost structure in real-terms

• Despite the likelihood of an improvement in power generation metrics, current electricity metrics maintained

• US$120m capex for Philips Shaft expansion (company guidance)

• US$15m for associated mine infrastructure (company guidance)

• US$60m for new gold plant with upgraded capacity (company guidance)

• Attributed no residual value to existing mill

• US$30m working capital requirements

• US$45m for capital contingency (20%)

• Borrowing rate is 8% pa, interest earned is 4% pa compounded monthly

• Debt to equity ratio of 70:30

• Stage 2 production rate to peak at just under 200koz Au pa 1H20

• Interest payments capitalised for the entire construction period and six month commissioning stage

• Repayment is US$7m paid semi-annually (including interest and principle)

• As per current agreement, the first five years of production is tax free

• 58 years of production equates to 10.7Moz Au extracted - we believe that the eventual mine resource remaining will easily

exceed this number

• Ongoing maintenance of 3% of total capex cost, US$8.2m pa from 2018 onwards

• Tax payable from 1H14 onwards - at 20% net profits (company guidance - although the corporate tax rate is 28%, using a

lower rate probably relates to tax offsets)

• Royalties at 3%

• On current revenue assumptions, and large ouflows for exploration and development, have assumed the need for a capital

raise to sustain equity portion of Stage 2 mill/mine expansion

• NPV calculated over an expanded shareholder base totalling 111.02m shares

Page 21: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 21 of 48

Financial Forecast

In our financial forecast, we have taken a conservative approach to production and grade,

given that the previous two operators were “remiss” both in their geological investment (i.e.

drilling) and capital-development. Management is acutely aware that in order to create a

profitable and sustainable operation as well as, in time, increase the mine’s productive

capacity, a substantial investment in capital development (especially in underground drives

and stopeing) needs to be undertaken before the mine can reach its full potential. We do

not have the company reaching targeted production levels of 100koz Au pa until 2016.

This relatively slow ramp-up phase is our estimation based on legacy issues that current

management have to contend with, and is not at all a reflection on mine personal, whom we

were impressed with. Rather, it is a result of the failure of previous operators during

periods of extremely depressed gold prices. We are cognisant of the difficulties associated

in ramping up production at such an established operation, and the unforeseen difficulties

that inevitably arise.

Table 5: Mining Metrics. Grade increases as production concentrates on underground sulphide material.

Source: HD Capital

Figures 21 & 22: Production is currently split between higher-grade underground material and open-pit oxide surficial

material. By the close of 2014, oxide production will be phased out and it is envisaged that production will be entirely

underground sourced (left); and total annual tonnage versus production grade, with the increase in grade from 5.0 to

7.5g/t Au due to improved mining systems to match historical production records (right).

Source: HD Capital

Year End 31 October 2012F 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F

Tonnes Produced (000t) 471.9 416.9 391.9 471.9 501.9 501.9

Average-weighted ROM grade (g/t) 4.99 5.96 7.39 7.47 7.47 7.47

Average-weighted metallurgical recoveries (%) 82% 83% 84% 84% 84% 84%

Global grade (recovered) (g/t) 4.10 4.93 6.19 6.27 6.27 6.27

Ounces produced oz 62,137 66,122 78,003 95,110 101,259 101,259

Cash costs - underground (US$/oz) 1153.5 1191.0 1047.1 934.2 903.0 903.0

Cash costs - oxide (US$/oz) 274.9 282.1 227.7 228.3 228.7 228.7

Cash costs - recovered slimes (US$/oz) 87.9 91.7 92.3 92.9 93.3 93.3

Cash costs - global (average-weighted) (US$/t) 1037.3 1108.5 1011.9 908.7 880.0 880.0

Page 22: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 22 of 48

Our financial model that comprises of both fixed and variable costs at different production

levels, encompasses a number of capex scenarios. The model reflects the fact that the

mine has a high cost base which is incurred whether the mine produces any gold or not.

However, once production crosses a certain threshold (i.e. covering the fixed cost base),

cēterīs paribus, cash-costs fall substantially, as every unit of production is effectively

variable. This can be readily seen in Table 6, with underground production costs forecast

to be in the vicinity of US$1037/oz Au in 2012 at a production rate of 62koz, but falling to

US$880/oz Au in 2016 when production reaches 101koz Au.

Table 6: Underground Segmental Analysis - Earnings Analysis, with very healthy operating surpluses.

Source: HD Capital

Figures 23 & 24: As production increases, the cost per ounce of gold produced falls substantially, reflecting not only

economies of scale, but a high fixed cost base versus a relatively low unit variable cost. Note that cost per ounce begins

to increase again once Stage 2 commences its production ramp-up in 2018 (left); and historical gold production from 1990

through to 2006 and average annual grade; from which we derive that an average production grade of 7.5g/t Au in the

future is eminently achievable (right).

Source: HD Capital

Year End 31 October 2012F 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F

Labour Costs (fixed) ($/t) 20.0 19.0 16.2 13.3 12.5 12.5

Labour Costs (variable) ($/t) 2.7 3.7 6.5 9.4 10.2 10.2

Engineering ($/t) 27.7 26.4 22.5 18.5 17.3 17.3

Mining ($/t) 76.3 81.0 85.3 86.1 86.1 86.1

Maintenance capex ($/t) 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.4

Milling (fixed) ($/t) 17.9 17.0 14.5 11.9 11.2 11.2

Milling (variable) ($/t) 6.7 7.1 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.6

Capital development consumed within 12 months ($/t) 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3

Energy ($/t) 51.9 49.4 42.1 34.6 32.4 32.4

Admin & other ($/t) 4.1 3.9 3.4 2.8 2.6 2.6

Total Cost per tonne ($/t) 211.6 211.6 201.3 187.0 182.5 182.5

Total Revenue per tonne ($/t) 342.2 340.2 334.4 301.4 301.4 301.4

Operating Surplus ($/t) 130.5 128.6 133.1 114.5 118.9 118.9

Operating margin % 62% 61% 66% 61% 65% 65%

Page 23: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 23 of 48

Figures 25 & 26: Gross revenue (left); contrasting with operating revenue which reflects variation in cash-costs (right).

Source: HD Capital Assumed a long-term USD/GBP exchange rate of £0.60

Figures 27 & 28: EBITDA (left); and total metres of development (right). The dramatic rise in development compared to previous years is largely to rectify a significant period of time historically, when development and drilling were scaled back in order to lower costs during periods of depressed gold prices.

Source: HD Capital Assumed a long-term USD/GBP exchange rate of £0.60

Figures 29 & 30: Operating cash-flow per share (left); and earnings per share (right).

Source: HD Capital Assumed a long-term USD/GBP exchange rate of £0.60

Page 24: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 24 of 48

Figures 31 & 32: Cash-cost per tonne (left); and cash-cost per ounce (right). The variation between the two diagrams

reflects the fact that although mining and processing costs remain approximately the same despite increased tonnages, it

is the increase grade via improved mine scheduling, planning and improved extraction techniques that allow a lower cash-

cost per ounce.

Source: HD Capital Assumed a long-term USD/GBP exchange rate of £0.60

Page 25: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 25 of 48

The Inadequacy of NPV Valuation Method

The NPV financial calculation is based on production guidelines. However, we are cognisant that in this particular instance the calculation is an inadequate method in assessing a reasonable valuation, because after year-10 (due to the compounding nature of the applied discount), any additional revenue generated by the mine only has a collective minutiae effect on the final valuation.

We have chosen not to do peer-analysis, because it is our observation that it is regularly manipulated by the unscrupulous to imply valuations to stocks that are entirely unjustifiable, hence our preference for more quantitative methods.

Despite the deposit’s obvious shortcoming (the inability of the deposit to be mechanised) and the requirement to organically grow its work-force, we are extremely positive on the future of this project. We believe that the old Emperor Mine still has at least 58 years of production ahead of it – despite the fact that the NPV calculation fails to capture approximately 48 years of that future. It is a long-life and very valuable asset with enormous potential up-side. It is in this context that we remind readers of Medusa Mining (see insert on page 9), and the fact that no one (including this analyst) expected it to reach the heights it has. For the moderately risk tolerant and patient investor, this company VGM simply needs time, after which they will be richly rewarded.

Financial Valuation

The VGM valuation is based entirely on projected cashflows from the old Emperor Gold

mine. It is a non-linear financial model with fixed (labour, engineering, milling, mine

fixtures, capital development, power generation and administration) and variable (labour,

milling, mine consumables, smelting, refining and transport) components. The valuation

does include a conservative “Stage 2” expansion scenario, increasing production tonnage

by 53% from 650kt to 1Mtpa, reaching its designed production plateau in 1H20. Given the

size of the current resource, and the potential for its expansion, we think that this modest

increase in production is eminently achievable.

The financial model is entirely based in USD, with the exception of third party smelting,

refining and transport which is done in AUD, with the final valuation into GBP at the

conclusion of the process. The use of a discount rate of 12% is appropriate and is similar

to comparable mining stocks. It encapsulates a number of perceived investment risks in

either reaching Stage 1 (~101koz pa Au) or Stage 2 (~200koz pa Au). We have refrained

from calculating a WACC9, because we think it entirely inappropriate to be used for

companies at this end of the mining sector.

Our three-year target uses the same discount rate as the current valuation (see Table 7),

but begins to value cashflows from FY15 onwards. The effect of this technique is to

minimise the compounding effect of the DCF model during the period whereby the

company is establishing Stage 1, as well as more effectively valuing the additional

production emanating from Stage 2. This increases the valuation significantly (~50%) from

165p to 247p per share.

9 Weighted average cost of capital.

Table 7: Post-tax NPV matrix at varying discount rates, calculated over an expanded

shareholder base totalling 111.02m shares on issue.

Source: HD Capital

Discount rate After-tax NPV

(USD)

Three-year

NPV (USD)

Per Share

(USD)

Per Share

(£p)

3-year Target

(USD)

3-year Target

(£p)

0% 5,415 5,365 49 2,926 48 2,900

2% 2,643 2,867 24 1,428 26 1,550

4% 2,814 1,700 25 1,521 15 918

6% 1,422 1,105 13 769 10 597

8% 751 811 7 406 7 438

10% 450 596 4 243 5 322

12% 305 457 3 165 4 247

14% 224 365 2 121 3 197

16% 172 301 2 93 3 162

18% 137 253 1 74 2 137

20% 5.32 217 0 4 2 117

22% 0.88 188 0 1 2 102

24% (2.50) 165 (0) (2) 1 89

Page 26: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 26 of 48

Sensitivity Analysis

In the past decade (despite the gold price climbing five-fold) costs have typically kept pace

and is the main reason why, for instance, many lower-grade Orogenic gold deposits in the

Western Australian Goldfields have not re-opened. The Emperor Gold mine has a high

fixed cost base, using selective mining techniques. As previously mentioned, once fixed

costs are covered this project is highly leveraged to the gold price meaning, cēterīs paribus,

a 5% increase in the gold price results in a 41.9% increase in the company’s NPV (see

Table 8).

Table 8: Sensitivity of mining, metallurgical, commodity and currency assumptions

on the company’s NPV

Source: HD Capital

Additional points of interest include:

Gold-grade and metallurgical recoveries are also sensitive inputs, both being

associated with the revenue equation;

The financial model is far more sensitive to production from underground sources

than surficial oxide sources. Hence the reason why profitability does not suffer too

egregiously once oxide sources are no longer processed; and

Mine fixture and consumables have a large variable component and hence its impact

is more influenced by production output.

We would also point out that it is the quantum of change that is important as well. From the

sensitivity table above, it would appear that power generation costs are inconsequential.

However, as previously mentioned, management believe that when a cogeneration power-

plant is commissioned, electricity tariffs could effectively halve. Yet, the effect on this

model is very material, potentially increasing NPV and three-year target valuations by

approximately 25% to 206p and 309p, respectively (see Power Generation section).

Obviously, the converse is also true if oil prices increased by the same percentage

quantum.

Factor Factor Variation (%) Change in Company NPV (%)

Gold Price 5% 41.9%

Gold Grade 5% 17.9%

Silver Grade 5% 0.0%

Metallurgical Recoveries 5% 12.1%

Milling (Fixed and Variable) 5% (1.1%)

Underground Production 5% 12.0%

Oxide Production 5% 0.3%

Labour (Fixed and Variable) 5% (0.9%)

Power Generation Costs 5% (2.5%)

Engineering 5% (1.6%)

Mine Fixtures and Consumables (Fixed & Variable) 5% (7.2%)

Exploration Expenditure 5% (0.4%)

Administration 5% (0.2%)

Third party smelting, refining & transport 5% (0.1%)

Capex Costs 5% (1.2%)

Page 27: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 27 of 48

APPENDIX I - Fiji

Background

The first settlements in Fiji were

started by voyaging traders and

settlers from the west around

1500 BC. Europeans settled on

the islands permanently at the

beginning of the 19th century.

The British granted Fiji

independence in 1970.

Fiji has long suffered from ethnic

tension between the indigenous,

mostly Christian population and

a large minority of Hindu or

Muslim Indo–Fijians. Democratic

rule was interrupted by two

military coups in 1987 because

the government was perceived to

be dominated by the Indian

community. Free and peaceful

elections in 1999 resulted in a

government led by an Indo-

Fijian, but a civilian-led coup in

May 2000 ushered in a

prolonged period of political

turmoil. Parliamentary elections

held in August 2001 provided Fiji with a democratically elected government, which was re-

elected in May 2006, but was subsequently ousted in December 2006 by a military coup

led by Commodore Bainimarama. He initially appointed himself as president, before

becoming prime minister. Since taking office, he has effectively suspended democratic rule

and steadfastly refuses to hold elections.

Consequently, in September 2009, Fiji was suspended from the Commonwealth.

Sanctions have been imposed by Fiji’s main trading partners, including the European Union

and Australia, which has hurt vital agricultural, clothing, and fishing industries. In addition,

the coups and accompanying civil unrest have contributed to heavy Indian emigration, 70%

moving to either Australia, New Zealand or Canada. The population loss of mainly qualified

tertiary emigrants has caused compounding economic difficulties, but ultimately has

ensured that Melanesians have become the majority, thereby reducing political instability.

Country Transparency

According to the Index of Economic Freedom (2011)10

, Fiji’s score was 60.4, largely

unchanged from the previous year. Overall, it ranks the country as the 86th

best place to do

business globally, behind Burkina Faso but ahead of Italy. The top four places rated to do

business in order, are Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand. The United

States came 9th

, the United Kingdom 16th.

10

The Index of Economic Freedom is constructed through the analysis of 10 specific components of economic freedom, some of which

are themselves composites of additional quantifiable measures. Each of the 10 economic freedoms is graded on a scale from 0 to 100. The 10 component scores are equally weighted and averaged to get an overall economic freedom score for each economy.

Figure 33: General map of Fiji

Source: CIA World Factbook

Doing business in Fiji is equivalent to Italy or Burkina Faso.

Page 28: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 28 of 48

Fiji rates relatively well in several areas: in fiscal freedom, government spending and

monetary freedoms. The top income tax-rate is 31%, and the corporate tax rate has been

reduced to 28%. In the most recent year, overall tax revenue as a percentage of GDP fell

to 21.1%. Total government expenditures are steady at 25%, yet despite fiscal restraint,

the country recently ran a 3% deficit due to lower than expected receipts. Inflation has

increased, reaching 10.5% in April 2010 following a 20% devaluation of the Fiji dollar in

April 2009.

Although Fiji has not been ranked since 2005, Transparency International’s11

“Corruption

Perceptions Index” last had Fiji 55th out of 158 nations

12, which is higher than countries

such as Kuwait or South Africa, at equal 54, but lower than Malaysia, Namibia or Turkey at

56. Given Fiji’s relatively small population, personal relationships play a major role in

business. The protection of property rights and investment freedoms was ranked poorly.

All foreign investment has to be government approved, with investors having to meet

certain conditions before investing. Bureaucracy and regulation can be burdensome, and

the independence of the judiciary is sometimes questionable.

Fiji is currently attracting substantial foreign mining investment. The Namosi joint venture

(owned by Newcrest), located 30km west of the capital Suva, contains the Waisoi deposit

(as well as other copper-gold targets), and is ranked as one of the world’s largest

undeveloped copper-gold deposits, last estimated to contain total resources of 7.9Mt Cu

and 7.7Moz Au. According to the The Fiji Times13

, the country’s Prime Minister

Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama is overseeing talks and negotiations relating to Namosi,

including negotiations on the mine, whilst environmental assessment and economic impact

studies are still being concluded. The mine is expected to have an initial investment of

US$1Bn, with a similar annual turnover from 2015 onwards. Infrastructure development is

expected to commence in June this year.

11

Transparency International compiles surveys that ask businessmen and analysts, both in and outside the countries they are analysing,

their perceptions of how corrupt a country is. Data can vary widely depending on the public perception of a country, the completeness of the surveys and the methodology used. The second issue is that data cannot be compared from year to year because the organisation (Transparency International) uses different methodologies and samples every year. 12

New Zealand, Denmark and Singapore all share first place for being perceived as the least corrupt nations. 13

http://www.fijitimes.com/story.aspx?id=190898

Page 29: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 29 of 48

APPENDIX II – Epithermal Gold Deposit Formation

Epithermal refers to mineral deposits that

form in association with hot waters and occur

in fairly well defined zones of mineralisation,

typically narrow in width relative to its length

and depth. The deposits form within 1 km of

the surface and water temperatures are

about 50-200o C. Shallow bodies of magma

supply heat. The rising hot water carries

dissolved gold and other elements. The

water boils about 300m below the surface

and hydrogen sulphide gas escapes,

inducing gold precipitation. This boiling zone

is the target for mineral exploration. These

types of epithermal deposits are typically no

older than 30Myrs, because older deposits

are destroyed by the tectonic and geological

settings that first created them.

Epithermal vein systems range in thickness

from a few centimetres to (in exceptional

cases) tens of metres, but typically have

widths of less than four metres. Some

deposits have been known to be several

kilometres in length and up to 1500m in

depth. Veins commonly consist of quartz, although gold is rarely visible, with mineralisation

commonly occurring in shoots within vein structures. Mining of epithermal deposits

typically require underground adits, shafts and narrow stopes to minimise dilution. Rarely

do vein-systems occur near the surface that are of sufficient width to allow initial mining via

open-pit methods.

There are two recognised end-member styles of epithermal gold deposits: high sulphidation

and low sulphidation, with distinctly different chemical fluid compositions reflecting

contrasting volcanic environments (see Table 9). Gold mineralisation from high

sulphidation deposits is hosted by leached silicic rock associated with acidic fluids

generated in the volcanic-hydrothermal environment. By comparison, the fluid responsible

for formation of low sulphidation ore veins is geochemically similar to waters intersected via

drilling beneath hot springs into geothermal systems, waters that are reduced and neutral-

pH.

Figure 34: Generic epithermal model, with gold fluids being carried up by

heated meteoric waters, to a point where the geochemical regime changes,

either by a drop in temperature and/or pressure allowing gold to come out of

solution and precipitate.

Source: Encyclopaedia Britannica 1999, HD Capital

Table 9: General characteristics of epithermal gold deposits associated with subaerial volcanic rocks. In mineral

exploration both CO2 and CH4 are known to be strongly correlated with gold mineralisation and so the identification of low

temperature decrepitation peaks can be used in exploration for gold deposits.

Source: Japanese Geological Survey, HD Capital

LOW SULPHIDATION HIGH SULPHIDATION

(Adularia-sericite) (Acid-sulfate)

Deposit Form Open-space veins dominant, stockwork ore common.

Disseminated and replacement ore minor

Disseminated ore dominant, replacement ore common.

Stockwork ore minor, veins commonly subordinate

Textures Veins, cavity filling (bands, colloforms, druses), breccias Wallrock replacement, breccias, veins

Ore Bearing Minerals Pyrite, electrum, gold, sphalerite, galena (arsenopyrite)

Pyrite, enargite, chalcopyrite, tennantite, covellite, gold,

tellurides

Gangue Minerals Quartz, chalcedony, calcite, adularia, illite, carbonates Quartz, alunite, barite, kaolinite, pyrophyllite

Metals (typical metal/mineral associations) Au, Ag, Zn, Pb (Cu, Sb, As, Hg, Se) Cu, Au, Ag, As (Pb, Hg, Sb, Te, Sn, Mo, Bi)

Page 30: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 30 of 48

APPENDIX III – Effective Peak Gold?

Burgeoning Nouveau Riche Demand

The mere existence of what we understand today as the gold standard was the result of

Spanish colonisation in Mexico and Peru during the 15th

and 16th

centuries that yielded so

much silver and gold that there was a major inflationary event throughout Europe the

following century. It affected all other commodities and ironically, in turn helped to ruin the

Spanish Empire, the global super-power of its time. It was this increase in supply that

allowed Britain (followed by other European nations) to go onto the “Gold Standard”14

in

1821. This meant that the British currency could be exchanged for gold on demand. From

that point onwards, the gold price in circulation was largely dependent on new supply from

mining operations. If there were new gold discoveries (e.g. Victoria, 1850; Klondike, 1896),

then the price of gold would drop. If economic activity grew faster than supply of gold, the

metal price would rise.

Figures 35 & 36: Although the gold price has risen against all currencies, in turn, some are more equal than others; as

demonstrated by the USD displaying substantially more weakness than the GBP (left); and nominal gold price versus

CPI indexed gold price. Despite the gold price reaching new highs in nominal-terms, it is in fact not dissimilar in real-

terms to that reached briefly in 1980 (right).

Source: World Gold Council 2011, HD Capital

Many equity markets around the world are trading nominally below what they were in the

year 2000; and in real-terms taking into account inflation, the majority have made no real

returns since 1996. Yet over that time, in a relatively benign inflation environment, the gold

price has risen in-excess of 500%, recently exceeding its previous peak (in real-terms) of

1980 (see Figure 36).

We believe that the main reason for this increase is that over the past decade, we have

witnessed the greatest bout of social, industrial and economic improvement that humanity

has ever seen. It is no coincidence that with the emergence of a large affluent middle-class

among BRIC nations, including China, India (see Figure 38) and Brazil gold has seen its

own meteoric rise, from its price low in 1999. Over time, all these countries have become

voracious consumers of the yellow metal, either for investment, Central Bank holdings or

jewellery. In addition, there is renewed investment via the use of Exchange-Traded Funds

(EFTs). Total EFT holdings exceed 2,450t, surpassing the gold holdings of Banque de

France, and being just short of Italy’s official reserves. On their own, ETFs now represent

14

In time, the gold standard was replaced by the Bretton-Woods system, which had hallmarks of the original gold standard, but was designed specifically as a system of international payments to be conducted without fear of sudden depreciation or wild fluctuations in exchange rates, which had been largely responsible for paralysing capitalism and global trade during the Great Depression.

The unabated rise in gold price since 1999 does not (as yet!) reflect the proliferation of fiat currencies. There has been a structural change in gold demand since 1999; primarily from large industrialising nations including China, Russia, and Brazil.

Historically, the gold price has been subject to the vagaries of demand and supply.

Page 31: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 31 of 48

the 5th largest holding of the yellow metal. In a perfectly competitive market when this

growth in demand is not reciprocated by an increase in supply, the price increases until the

opportunity cost equals the available inelastic-supply, and there is equilibrium.

Figure 37: Western World mineral exploration expenditures expressed as a percentage per

commodity class.

Source: MinEx, Nov 2011, HD Capital

Despite being increasingly difficult to discover, gold

is still a very attractive commodity to explore for.

Unlike base metals, gold deposits display a wide

diversity throughout geological time and

environments. The capital intensity is relatively low,

approximately one half to one third of that required for

a base metal project with the same sales revenue.

This allows quicker repayment of capital, thereby

lowering project risk. Other benefits include the

production of bullion on site, decreasing

transportation problems, which also allows mines to

be located in more remote areas. Processing is also

less energy intensive, with power often able to be

generated on-site.

With increasing demand from new middle-class

populaces from BRIC nations, coupled with

renewed interest from Western institutions, and

insufficient foreseeable supply, we believe gold

will suffer from a structural supply shortage into

the foreseeable future.

Figure 38: Emerging Asia’s share of global gold demand

Source: GMO, World Gold Council 2011, HD Capital

It may surprise many investors that gold is in fact the most sort-after metal globally – in terms of exploration expenditure.

Page 32: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 32 of 48

Constrained Primary Supply Growth

A remarkable thing about gold is that most of it ever mined still remains, estimated to

collectively total 175kt Au (or a cube 20.45m). Over 85% of the gold mined in history has

occurred since 1890, with two thirds extracted in the past 50 years. When discussing gold

supply, it is important to understand the nature of a non-renewable Resource:

The nature of depletion for a non-renewable resource dictates that exploitation of a

particular deposit will result in physical mineral depletion. If depletion continues

unchecked while other economic and technological conditions remain the same,

resource scarcity and the cost of mineral production will increase, causing real

mineral prices to rise; and

Discovery depletion, again, all things remaining equal, means the easier-to-find

deposits will be located first, with the more difficult deposits found later. The latter

deposits, as a rule, are usually of a poorer quality than initial operating mines, in that

their production costs per unit of output are higher (e.g. gold mines became deeper).

Despite the enormous growth in demand (reflected by a fivefold increase in price), unlike

many other commodities, primary supply (i.e. gold extracted from mining and processing

operations) has been entirely unable to react due to geological constraints (i.e. insufficient

gold is being discovered to match demand), meaning that the future supply of gold will

become increasingly more inelastic. This is evidenced by the general lack of success by

major gold mining houses to replace current production. For example, 2010 production by

Barrick Gold, Newmont Mining, AngloGold Ashanti, and Gold Fields was 21% (or 4.4Moz

Au) lower than that recorded in 2006. Global gold mine production peaked in 2001 at

2,645t Au, and recorded a year-on-year decline until 2010 with production reaching 2,686t

Au. Primary production is forecast to reach in-excess of 2,700t Au in 2011. Declining

South African, United States and Canadian production has been offset by increased

production from Australia, Latin America, China and Africa, with the total net difference

largely negligible (see Figure 40). Since 1990, global primary gold production has been

anemic, increasing on average 1.03% pa, and in the past decade production has largely

remained static.

Figures 39 & 40: Gold price in USD from 1990 to 2011 (left); and primary gold supply from mined sources (right).

Source: World Gold Council 2011, USGS 2011, ABARE 2010, ABARE, March 2011, HD Capital

The most important source of gold supply for the past century has been Witwatersrand15

. It

is estimated, that between 40 and 50% of the world’s gold bullion has been extracted from

15

"Ridge of white waters" in Afrikaans.

Nearly half of all the world’s gold has been sourced from a single orebody, the Witwatersrand, in South Africa. Almost without exception, major gold mining houses would be unable to replace their current production profiles without judicious corporate acquisitions.

Page 33: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 33 of 48

this single deposit. Discovered near Johannesburg in 1886, it is an ancient placer deposit,

hosted by conglomerates and sandstones, part of a sedimentary basin that stretches

through an arc of approximately 400km (covering 3.6m hectares) across the Free State,

North West and Gauteng Provinces, in South Africa. Some geoscientists estimate that

roughly one-third of the world's known gold resources remain unmined. However, after a

century of extraction, the Witwatersrand is now only a shadow of its former glory, with all of

its active mines operating underground, reaching depths of over 3.8km – with the Mponeng

gold mine the world's deepest. Peak production was reached in 1970 when over 1,000

tonnes (32.15Moz) Au was mined annually. As a result of declining ore grades (from

13.3g/t in 1970 to an average of around 6.0g/t currently), increased depth, personnel

problems, power interruptions and rising production costs, has seen output falling steadily

to around 200t (6.43Moz) Au pa presently.

Figure 41: Average global ore grade for all primary gold discoveries (>1Moz) versus the

average head-grade of ore mined. The diagram is somewhat misleading, because it appears

to indicate that gold grades are in perpetual free-fall. In-fact, the lower grade is in part due

to technological innovations, which can alleviate upward, or even reverse the pressure on

mineral costs over time. In particular, the lower grade over time demonstrates the

economies-of-scale involved in the processing of low-grade gold from large diffuse surficial

Orogenic gold deposits, often with processing a more important determinant than mining.

Source: MinEx, Nov 2011, HD Capital

Most are unaware of the historical importance of this single gold orebody (Witwatersrand16

)

meaning that for more than any other reason, it has singularly kept gold prices subdued for

the better part of the entire 20th

Century. However, as already stated regarding discovery

depletion, it is highly unlikely we will ever discover another Witwatersrand analogue. This

in turn implies, that (baring a technological breakthrough, on the scale of being able to

extract gold from seawater) structural demand for gold will most likely continually exceed

supply in the foreseeable future.

We conclude that the rise in the gold price is largely unrelated to the current credit

and sovereign debt crisis; but is the result of the inability of supply to keep up with

demand driven by global economic development.

16

Diamonds are also associated with the Witwatersrand reefs (some diamonds up to 8 carats were found), although a natural green colouration ranging from a nuance of green to bottle green and almost black was the result of the natural radiation caused with the association of uranium. Diamonds are no longer recovered from the Witwatersrand gold mines due to a change in the reduction procedure.

The Gold production profile from the Witwatersrand was so prolific that it more than any other reason, subdued the gold price for the entire 20

th Century.

No other Witwatersrand geological analogue exists on earth, for if it did, we would certainly have discovered it. This implies that supply demand dynamics now largely reflect forces more akin to those in the 19

th Century, than those more

recently observed throughout the 20

th Century.

Page 34: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 34 of 48

Central Bank Demand Haphazard

When discussing Central Bank gold reserves of any country, it is always important to put

into historical context how they were acquired. It was at the time the world’s largest

financial traction in history. In October 1939, part of Britain's gold reserves, bonds and

stock (then valued at US$7bn) were shipped to Canada in a light battle cruiser to pay for

raw materials, part of what Churchill referred to in February 1941, “Give us the tools and we

will finish the job”. Yet despite the hyperbole, the salient fact was that mercantilist America

would not give anything without payment. The Witwatersrand17

had, as part of her

colonies, allowed the UK to be by far the largest single holder of gold prior to WWII. Yet in

1941, after two years of war, Roosevelt had stripped Britain of all her assets globally,

including various leases in the West Indies, to the extent, that an American cruiser was

dispatched to the South African naval base of Simonstown, to pick up Britain's last

negotiable asset, £42m worth of gold bullion. It was these collective payments in physical

bullion that resulted in America at the close of WWII, being the single largest holder of gold

(see Figure 42).

Figures 42 & 43: Break-down of Central Reserves by region in 1951 totalling 30,821t Au (left); and break-down by region

of gold Reserves held by Central Banks in 2011, totalling 31,597t Au. Amazingly, despite a 60-year hiatus, there is only a

2.5% physical variation in the net amount held by all the Central Banks; disproving a common perception that it is net

Central Bank sales or purchases that largely affect demand or supply in the long-term (right).

Source: IMF, World Gold Council, HD Capital

In 1951, global gold reserves stood at 30,821t, 66% of which was held by the US (20,326t

Au - despite selling 1,356t from several years earlier). Sixty years later, in 2011, global

gold reserves stand at 31,567t Au, only a little over 2% more than previously. What is

surprising is that America’s current reserve (approximately 8,135t Au) equates to only 38%

of its gold holding of 60 years ago. In contrast, Europe’s post WWII gold holdings have

increased 122% (from a very low base following WWII) despite the UK selling 88% of its

gold from the post-war 1960/61 peak holdings.

Using a combination of World Gold Council and IMF data as well as our own calculations,

we estimate that Central Banks bought 237t over the first three quarters of 2011 (see Table

11). In addition we recognise (from other sources) that a significant portion of Central Bank

purchases (potentially 30 to 40%) could be undeclared in the IMF statistics. In the five

years from 2003 to 2008, China added 454t of gold to their reserves, reportedly amassing

17

Acquired following the Boer War in 1899. In 1871, diamonds were discovered in the Kimberley, prompting a diamond rush and a

massive influx of foreigners to the borders of the Orange Free State. Then the Witwatersrand was discovered within the South African Republic in 1886, making the Transvaal the richest and potentially the most powerful nation in southern Africa. Political interests, even military raids, propagated by one Cecil Rhodes, coupled with a massive influx of British workers, meant that war was largely inevitable.

WWII gifted America with the world’s largest gold Reserves (70% of the total at its peak) as the United Kingdom used its holdings to purchase raw materials for the war effort.

We assume that Central Bank sales or purchases have no net impact on supply or demand of gold. And this has been the case since WWII. Given that two thirds of the worlds gold supply has been extracted in the past 50 years (see p. 32), the impact of bank purchases or sales has dramatically diminished in importance over time.

Page 35: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 35 of 48

the gold via a government agency from domestic production using RMB, which was

subsequently handed over to the People’s Bank of China in 2008. Given their gold

holdings still only represent a tiny fraction (<1%) of their reserves (compared with >70% of

German, Italian and French reserves – see Table 12), intuitively it makes sense that the

Chinese would continue to use non-Central Bank agencies to increase their reserves. If

they stick to this policy, they should make their next holding announcement in mid 2013.

Table 10: Official Gold Holdings (tonnes), from 2004 to Sept. 2011

Source: World Gold Council 2011, IMF, HD Capital

Despite net Reserves having remained largely static over the past half-century, if 2010-

2011 Central Bank buying momentum is maintained going forward then purchases

should account for 13% of global primary production, which in turn would represent

a significant new source of gold demand.

Table 11: Official Gold Sector Net Purchases/Sales (tonnes), from 2004 to Sept. 2011

Source: World Gold Council 2011, IMF, HD Capital

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*

Africa 420 420 420 420 420 422 422 422

Asia 2,402 2,417 2,496 2,564 2,654 3,153 3,170 3,226

Australasia 80 80 80 80 80 80 81 81

Eastern Europe 930 933 949 941 1,015 1,142 1,283 1,347

Western Europe 14,051 13,529 13,207 12,707 12,436 12,300 12,294 12,294

Indian sub-continent 432 432 432 432 432 657 663 666

Latin & South America 571 571 571 573 576 586 599 714

Middle East 1,072 1,082 1,162 1,174 1,182 1,187 1,367 1,367

North America 8,140 8,140 8,138 8,138 8,138 8,138 8,138 8,138

IMF/ECB/BIS 3,425 3,418 3,402 3,368 3,355 3,342 3,342 3,342

Total 31,523 31,022 30,857 30,396 30,289 31,008 31,360 31,597

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*

Africa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0

Middle East (20.0) 10.0 80.0 11.8 8.4 5.0 180.0 0.0

Indian sub-continent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 225.0 6.3 2.7

Asia 44.8 15.2 79.0 67.8 90.3 499.0 17.1 55.5

Australasia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Eastern Europe 3.4 2.7 16.5 (8.4) 74.5 126.2 141.6 63.9

Western Europe (410.0) (522.0) (322.3) (499.9) (270.4) (136.0) (6.6) 0.2

North America 0.0 0.0 (2.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Latin & South America 54.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 3.4 10.0 13.1 114.6

IMF/ECB/BIS 0.0 (7.0) (16.0) (34.3) (12.8) (200.0) 0.0 0.0

Total (327.0) (501.1) (164.8) (461.3) (106.6) 531.3 351.5 236.9

Possibility of unofficial Chinese Bank gold purchases. For the first time in several decades, Central Banks (since 2009) have become net purchases of gold bullion.

Page 36: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 36 of 48

The Aftermath of Fiscal Profligacy

A continual sense of déjà vu has not disguised the fact that the credit (and ensuing

economic) crisis of 2007/2008, has morphed into the more serious current sovereign debt

crisis. With echoes of Generals always fighting the last war, nations have (without much

fore-thought) followed standard Keynesian dictum, bailing out the banks, and maintaining

public services in the face of declining tax receipts; having in addition increased public

project spending in a “vain” attempt to restore growth. Economic policy

responses by many Western Governments (already heavily shackled in

debt) have unwittingly made themselves victims.

According to a recent empirical study done by Reinhart and Rogoff (2009)18

,

financial (including sovereign debt) crises are typically severe and

protracted affairs, and more often than not, the aftermath has three

particular characteristics:

a) Asset market collapses are deep and prolonged. Real housing

price declines average 35%, stretched over a period of six years, with equity

markets collapsing on average 55% over a downturn of about three and a

half years;

b) The aftermath of banking crises is associated with profound

declines in output and employment. Unemployment typically rises by an

average of 7% over the down phase of the cycle, which lasts on average,

in-excess of four years. Output falls (from peak to trough) by an average of

over 9%, although the duration of the downturn (averaging roughly two

years) is considerably shorter than that observed for unemployment; and

c) The real value of government debt tends to explode, rising an

average of 86% during major post-World War II financial crisis episodes.

Interestingly, the main difference between the current sovereign debt crisis

and previous financial crises appears to be that the increase in Government

debt is not entirely related to the costs of bailing out and recapitalization of

the banking system, coupled with the inevitable collapse in tax revenues

that governments suffer in the wake of a deep and prolonged output

contraction. Rather, its severity will in part be due to the ambitious

(reckless?) countercyclical fiscal policies aimed at mitigating the downturn,

as evidenced in Japan following their property bubble in the 1990’s.

In conclusion, Reinhart and Rogoff suggest that we should expect sub-par global economic

growth for some considerable period of time. However, we believe that the length and

duration will be dependent on whether Central Banks pursue inflationary (printing money)

or deflationary (paying back the debt) policies.

18

Reinhart C.M. and Rogoff K.S. (2009) The Aftermath of Financial Crises. Presentation at the American Economic Association, San Francisco, Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 10:15 am. Session title: “International Aspects of Financial Market Imperfections.”

Figure 44: The fate of US$100 from 1965 to

today (Comparisons made on the 31st

December 2011). Despite paying no dividends,

it is remarkable that gold only under-

performed the S&P 500 by 27% over a 46 year

period. More importantly, it out-performed six

month US T-Bills by 233%; under-lining the

attraction of gold as a form of monetary

exchange against all fiat currencies, but in

particular, during sovereign debt crises.

Source: CNN, February 2012, HD Capital

Most western countries have followed Keynesian stimulus theory. Fiscal stimulus beyond a certain point could in fact exacerbate the current Sovereign debt crisis.

Page 37: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 37 of 48

The Future of Gold?

Given the amount of financial leverage undertaken in recent years, we believe that political

necessities (driven by the various national electorates) will exert enormous pressure on

various Central Banks to stimulate inflation as an attractive tool for solving public and

private debt problems. The effect of which, would be to wipe out the purchasing power of

both private and public savings, but ultimately be the elixir of the debtor. European nations

currently constrained by European monetary policy, such as Greece, Portugal and possibly

even Ireland are realistically, candidates for default and the reinstatement of their own

currencies. The danger with this strategy, however, is that excessive inflation distorts the

economy in favour of extreme consumption and the hoarding of real assets such as gold,

as well as making the affected country an anathema for investment (e.g. Zimbabwe). This

is what financial futurist and Wall Street pariah, James Dines has been predicting for a

considerable number of years: the inevitable “currency race to the bottom”.

Therefore, we believe it inevitable, particularly with export-oriented countries, that there will

be a series of competitive currency devaluations to regain/retain a competitive export

advantage. Recent examples include Japan, Iceland, Vietnam, Peru, and arguably the

United Kingdom and the United States. In particular, we look with interest to China’s

reaction given their slowing economy and deflating property sector. Students of Game

Theory will recognise that an “equivalent retaliation” (or tit for tat) strategy will invariably

ensue; ultimately all participants will have to participate or risk being left at a disadvantage.

Table 12: World gold holdings as a percentage of Reserves using November 2011 Au prices,

and total value of national Reserves at varying prices. Note that the United States,

Germany, France, the Netherlands and Italy all have very similar gold holdings (expressed

as a percentage of total Reserves). The anomaly is not so much how small developing

nations gold holdings are, but the small percentage of gold in relation to Switzerland’s

entire Reserve base; which gives an indication of the size of its national banking system.

Ironically, this contrasts with the common perception that the Swiss Franc is “safe”

because it is largely gold backed.

Source: World Gold Council 2011, IMF, HD Capital

It is in this context of massive sovereign defaults and the probable attempt by many others

to monetise debts via inflation that holding gold suddenly becomes a critical insurance plan

in an uncertain world. In Table 12 we list individual holdings of gold bullion, and express as

a percentage in the context of their respective countries total reserve holdings. Of

particular note, how these countries bullion holdings compare with outstanding liabilities.

Tonnes

% of

Reserves

Value at

US$1,500/oz

(US$Bn)

Value at

US$2,000/oz

(US$Bn)

Value at

US$2,500/oz

(US$Bn)

United States 8,133.5 75.5% 392,247 522,996 653,745

Germany 3,401.0 72.6% 164,017 218,689 273,362

International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2,814.0 N/A 135,708 180,944 226,181

Italy 2,451.8 72.2% 118,241 157,654 197,068

France 2,435.4 71.0% 117,450 156,600 195,750

China 1,051.1 1.7% 50,690 67,587 84,484

Switzerland 1,040.1 14.3% 50,160 66,880 83,600

Russia 851.5 8.6% 41,065 54,753 68,441

Japan 765.2 3.3% 36,903 49,204 61,504

Netherlands 612.5 61.0% 29,539 39,385 49,231

India 557.7 9.0% 26,896 35,861 44,826

European Central Bank (ECB) 502.1 35.0% 24,214 32,286 40,357

World 30,708.3 N/A

Euro Area (includ. ECB) 10,795.5 64.4%

Domestic political pressure will force many Central Banks globally to stimulate inflation as a solution to the excessive debt. If inflation were to reappear, it would be an attractive proposition to either hold physical bullion and/or gold mining producers.

Page 38: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 38 of 48

For example, the US has 8,133.5t of gold worth between US$392bn and US$523bn

(depending upon long-term gold assumption). However, given that its national debt19

is in-

excess of US$15.1tn, its gold holdings would only cover between 2.6% and 3.5% of total

outstanding liabilities. This is not unique, a similar picture exists for virtually every other

major Western nation with significant gold holdings. As hedge fund manager Kyle Bass

recently commented. it is inevitable that the world is heading for a hard default; given that

total world debt to GDP has historically only breached 200% when Governments were at

war. He then pointed out that the average Western Government debt is currently around

310%, with no sign of conflict (yet).

In summary:

a) We think it highly likely that in the medium to long-term politics of necessity will force

Governments of all political denominations, to push Central Banks to stimulate

inflation in order to solve public and private debt problems;

b) Domestic inflation will induce “beggar-thy-neighbour policies” (now alive in the

Euro zone20

, Japan and the US, with China publically touting the idea of devaluing the

Yuan), with actively deflating currencies, especially by exporter nations;

c) Central Bank gold holdings make up only a minuscule amount of outstanding total

debt. Given that Central Banks are now highly reluctant to sell their Reserves, this has

effectively put a floor21

under the gold price; and

d) Gold’s value is recognised globally (from the slums of Calcutta to Central Banks in

Europe). Part of the reason why Central Banks and private investors hold gold, is that

it is a liquid resource that can be used as collateral for borrowing. The opportunity cost

of gold is commonly compared with an insurance premium against a highly improbable

but damaging event, such as the recent credit crisis. And that it is the only

medium/currency that is not someone else’s liability (i.e. for any currency to be

acceptable as a valid medium, it has to be typically backed either by a Central Bank

and/or country).

19

http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 20

ECB’s balance sheet has expanded almost 50% in the last six months to €2.7 trillion, in addition the balance sheets of the 17

eurozone Central Banks have grown even faster and now add up to €1.7 trillion, creating a consolidated balance sheet in the European Central Banking system of €4.4 trillion, almost twice the size of the US Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. Jensen N.C. (2012) The Unlikely Bull Market. The Absolute Return Letter 10p. 21

Do we believe that gold is not susceptible to bubble-like tendencies? No, of course not! Gold’s last peak in 1980 (in relative terms,

see Figure 36) disproves the notion that gold is infallible. However, on balance, we believe it is in structural deficit and is less susceptible to Central Bank influence in the short to medium term than the equivalent fiat currencies, including the USD and Euro. If a major inflationary period is instigated collectively by the BOE, then gold will be an asset class (together with equities and property) that will provide a relative store of value in turbulent times.

In the grand scheme of things, Western Governments’ gold holdings only cover a small fraction of their liabilities. No Central Bank controls the price of gold. Its value is intrinsic and exists largely in a perfect market, subject to supply and demand.

Page 39: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 39 of 48

Thinking the Unthinkable

The current sovereign debt crisis has been unique in many ways. It has proven the

limitations of current Keynesian economic theory, and the ability of monetary policy to

stabilise banking crises via fiscal stimulus to restore demand and growth. Rather, it has

reminded many market participants of the concept that economic parameters are intimately

tied to political reality. That economic policy is only relevant if the populace has the political

will to implement them (e.g. contrasting the Irish versus the Greeks to implementing

austerity measures). It has also called into question whether many Western technocrat

democratic governments and their intermediaries can effectively manage the economy in

the long-term. Particularly in the EU where temporary government stimulus typically

become permanent grafts, in time, expanding government into virtually all sectors,

ultimately leading to malinvestment on a large scale.

There are two main narratives underlying the current Euro crisis; the German version holds

that the fiscal irresponsibility of the Greeks induced the debt crisis, and now they want

(without preconditions) to be effectively bailed out. However, equally, there is another

narrative that suggests that only one country, Greece, lived beyond its means and that

every other European country largely lived within theirs until recently during this current

crisis (e.g. Spain and Ireland previously had solid surpluses) when the risk profiles

changed.

Table 13: Household, corporate and government debt as a percentage of nominal GDP -

demonstrates the rapid rise of leverage in the debt super-cycle. For the thirty-year period

from 1980 to 2010, Spain’s, United Kingdom’s, Italy’s and Greece’s total household,

corporate and government debts levels increased by 106%, 101%, 184% and 185%,

respectively.

Source: Bank of International Settlements Sept. 2011, HD Capital

As Table 13 demonstrates, on the face of it, it is the non-German narrative that appears to

have been be borne out. With the exception of Australia and Germany, Greece in fact has

substantially lower equivalent debt levels than some of its peers the United Kingdom (-

23%) or Japan (-74%), for example, which under-scores the political dimension of the

sovereign debt crisis. For instance, the majority of Japanese government debt is funded

via domestic bonds by the general populace who trusts the government to repay its debt.

The Japanese are perceived as hard working, collective, stoic and diligent. By contrast,

Greece has a long colourful history of defaulting on its debts. Until recently (due to the

‘arduous and perilous’ nature of their work), Greek pastry chefs, radio announcers,

hairdressers and masseurs in steam baths were among more than 600 professions allowed

1980 1990 2000 2010 2000-10 1980-2010

Japan 290 364 410 456 11% 57%

Portugal N/A N/A 251 366 46% N/A

Spain 172 187 258 355 38% 106%

Sweden 219 289 320 340 6% 55%

Norway N/A N/A 256 334 30% N/A

Netherlands 205 265 294 327 11% 60%

United Kingdom 160 203 223 322 44% 101%

France 160 198 243 321 32% 101%

Canada 236 278 293 313 7% 33%

Italy 109 180 252 310 23% 184%

Greece 92 139 195 262 34% 185%

Germany 136 137 226 241 7% 77%

Australia 128 174 185 235 27% 84%

Average 322 24% 95%

Std Deviation 57 15% 50%

Debt Levels Change

The political dream (The Euro) has been trumped by economic reality. Austerity by itself is contractive. Political perception often dictates whether an investor is likely to be repaid – or not.

Page 40: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 40 of 48

to retire at 5022

, with a state pension covering 95% of their last working year’s earnings.

Tax evasion is endemic, to the point that taxi drivers went on a national strike when it was

announced that meters were to be placed in their vehicles.

Figure 14: OECD government, corporate and household debt to GDP, 2010.

Source: Bank of International Settlements Sept. 2011, HD Capital

Although not readily recognised being difficult to quantify, it is this political perception that

influences markets when they set bond rates. For example, Spain’s 10-year bond rates

were recently in-excess of 7.1%, meaning that the country would have to willingly spend

approximately 9.2% of its GDP (see Table 14) to access market funds. By comparison,

Japan’s 10 year bond rate is approximately 1.1%, meaning that despite its total debt being

65% larger than Italy’s, its costs in terms of servicing accounts is 2.3% of GDP, some 75%

less than Italy’s!

22

Malone A. (2011) The Big Fat Greek Gravy Train: A special investigation into the EU-funded culture of greed, tax evasion and scandalous waste. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2007949/The-Big-Fat-Greek-Gravy-Train-A-special-investigation-EU-funded-culture-greed-tax-evasion-scandalous-waste.html#ixzz1gDlii8ap

Total Government Corporate Household

Japan 456 213 161 82

Portugal 366 107 153 106

Spain 355 72 193 91

Sweden 340 58 196 87

Norway 334 65 174 94

Netherlands 327 76 121 130

United Kingdom 322 89 126 106

France 321 97 155 69

Canada 313 113 107 94

Italy 310 129 128 53

Greece 262 132 65 65

Germany 241 77 100 64

Australia 235 41 80 113

Average 98 135 89

Std Deviation 44 41 22

Political perceptions dictate whether existing debt levels are sustainable or not, and are prone to dramatic changes of view – as recently evidenced.

Page 41: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 41 of 48

British Pound & Fallacy of Growth

Debt accumulation is like putting on weight. It accrues slowly and often imperceptibly

without discomfort. One only becomes aware of the largesse when one does not recognise

oneself in a photo, or realises a favourite pair of jeans has not suddenly shrunk in the last

wash. The United Kingdom has realised that it needs to go on a crash diet, but like all

diets, the pain will be acute and the fear of failure hangs ever present.

To date, the British government has relied on the concept that growth will eventually

materialise and mitigate the need for harsh austerity measures. New forecasts from the

Office for Budget Responsibility (department within the UK Treasury) suggest it will take

until at least 2017 before Britain can rely on growth to eliminate its structural deficit,

(estimated to increase its proportion of public debt to GDP by an additional 7.5% more than

the government’s previous forecast). The lack of growth coupled with high unemployment

means that the UK economy will be roughly the same size in 2016 (in nominal terms) as it

was in 2007. The political implication is that the current minority government will have to

face the polls at least once in the midst of this austerity drive, with the political opposition

now advocating easing and more borrowing. The main question is - do the markets really

believe that the UK public has the stomach for at least six more years of cuts, and falling

living standards, before even reaching equilibrium?

According to McKinsey23, deleveraging episodes of Sweden and Finland in the 1990s (see

Figure 45) could provide a relevant roadmap on how this current credit crisis could resolve

itself in time. They identified two distinct phases of deleveraging; (i) initially households,

corporations, and financial institutions reduce debt significantly over a number years, while

economic growth is either negative or minimal, with government debt rising; followed by a

second phase (ii), where growth rebounds and government debt is reduced gradually over

many years. They suggest that the United States is closely following this debt-reduction

path, with debt in the financial sector relative to GDP falling back to levels last seen in

2000. However, for the reasons above, we do not think this model is applicable to Britain.

Earlier research24

studying 32 historical deleveraging episodes focused on patterns of debt

reduction, identifying four archetypes:

(1) Belt Tightening. 50% of the deleveraging paths; the rate of debt growth is slower

than nominal GDP growth (e.g. Finland (91-98); U.S. (33-37); South Korea (98-00)).

(2) High Inflation. 25% of the deleveraging paths, associated with the absence of strong

Central Banks, typically in emerging markets. Periods of high inflation mechanically

increase nominal GDP growth, thus reducing debt/GDP ratios (e.g. Spain (76-80); Italy

(75-87); Chile (84-91)).

(3) Massive Default. 22% of the deleveraging paths, often with currency crises, where

debt decreases due to massive private and public sector defaults (e.g. U.S. (29-33);

Argentina (02-08); Mexico (82-92)).

(4) Growing out of debt. Only accounting for 3% of the deleveraging paths, associated

with unusual events such as an oil or war boom, where economies experience rapid

real GDP growth and debt/GDP decreases (e.g. U.S. (38-43); Nigeria (01- 05)).

We envisage option two as the only real alternative for many countries. That if one does

not pay down ones debt; the only other alternative (other than default) is to inflate it away.

23

McKinsey Global Institute (2012) Debt and deleveraging: Uneven progress on the path to growth. Updated Research. 16 p. 24

McKinsey Global Institute (2010) Debt and deleveraging: The global credit bubble and its economic consequences. 94 p.

Although not readily recognised by the market yet, the UK’s debt level is unsustainable even if gilt-yields rise only marginally.

Page 42: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 42 of 48

Most macro economic analysis regarding the symptoms of hyperinflation concentrate on

either (i) the rapid increase in money, and/or (ii) the increase in the velocity of money (rate

at which money circulates in an economy over a given period). Which comes first is a

matter of academic debate. As Milton Friedman said, “Inflation is always and everywhere a

monetary phenomenon”, but as Niall Ferguson points out in his recent book, The Ascent of

Money25

, “hyperinflation is always and everywhere a political phenomenon”.

Figure 45: Swedish economic deleveraging model suggests that the United States

could potentially complete its deleveraging by mid-2013. In the UK it appears that the

deleveraging process has only just begun, with the ratio of household debt to

disposable income not expected to return to trend for another decade. Spain has

fewer policy options (with the Euro) and consequently has a long road ahead.

Source: McKinsey Global Institute, January 2012, HD Capital

Given the enormous amount of financial leverage undertaken in recent years, we suspect

that stimulating inflation is increasingly becoming an attractive tool available to the Bank of

England (BOE) as a way of solving public and private debt problems. The effect of which

will be:

(a) To wipe out the purchasing power of both private and public savings;

(b) To be the elixir of the debtor by dramatically diminishing the amount they owe in real-

terms;

(c) That this in turn will make the United Kingdom an anathema for foreign and domestic

investment; and

(d) The resultant inflation will distort the economy in favour of extreme

consumption and the hoarding of real assets (e.g. property, oil, equities in

perishables, such as Tesco, Morrison’s, etc). But in particular, gold.

25

Ferguson N. (2008) The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. The Penguin Press HC, 432 p.

The UK has only really just started the deleveraging process. It is only a matter of time before the BOE will stimulate a significant bout of inflation - which will mean that holding gold will be essential for all those whose main assets are denominated in GBP.

Page 43: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 43 of 48

APPENDIX III – Company Directors

David Karl Paxton: Managing Director

David is a Mining Engineer with over 35 years experience in the mining industry, with mine

production at Goldfields of South Africa, culminating with 24 years as a mining analyst for

both Goldfields and a number of Canadian and UK stockbrokers. He is a director of India

Minerals, Adit Investments, Sahara Mines, Ortac Resources, Far North Platinum, and

Mining and Dining Club.

Ian Colin Orr-Ewing: Executive Chairman

Ian has 35 years experience spanning both the oil and mining industries, having served as

a director of UK and Canadian oil companies, as well as Irish and Canadian mining

companies. He is currently an adviser to a fund management company on its natural

resources portfolios.

David Anthony Lenigas: Non-Executive Director

David is also a Mining Engineer, who between 1989 and 1991 was the Managing Director

of the joint venture company between Western Mining and Emperor Mines which ran the

Vatukoula Gold Mine. He is currently the executive chairman of Leni Gas & Oil Plc, Solo

Oil Plc, and Lonrho Mining Plc.

Kiran Caldas Morzaria: Finance Director

Kiran holds a Bachelor of Engineering (Industrial Geology) and has eight years experience

in the mineral resource industry covering gold and diamonds, spending his first four years

in exploration, mining and civil engineering. In 2004 he was appointed Finance Director of

Vatukoula Gold Mines Plc, and is also currently a non-executive director of Solo Oil Plc and

Hot Tuna.

John Ian Stalker: Non-Executive Director

John is a Chemical Engineer, and has worked in an engineering, mining, and metallurgical

consultancy company, at Lycopodium, as well as stints in Ashanti, Caledonia Mining,

Goldfields and Zambia Copper Mines. He was CEO of UraMin before it was acquired by

Areva.

John Francis Kearney: Non-Executive Director

John is a Lawyer with experience in corporate development and finance in mining ventures.

He is currently Chairman and President of Canadian Zinc.

John Arthur MacPherson: Non-Executive Director

A founding chairman of Canadian Zinc, he has been in corporate finance and development

for over 30 years, primarily in the fields of mining and oil and gas. Throughout his career he

has served as director of a number of public corporations listed on the Toronto Stock

Exchange, AMEX and LSE.

Page 44: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 44 of 48

Glossary

Agglomerates: Large, coarse, rock fragments associated with lava flow that are ejected

during explosive volcanic eruptions; essentially pyroclastic igneous rocks that consist

almost wholly of angular or rounded lava fragments of varying size and shape. Fragments

are usually poorly sorted in a tuffaceous matrix, or appear in lithified volcanic dust or ash.

Archipelago: A large number of scattered islands.

Alkaline rocks: Rocks in which the chemical content of the alkalies (potassium and

sodium oxides) is sufficient for alkaline minerals to form.

Andesite: A fine-grained volcanic extrusive rock associated with convergent plate

boundaries, grained, composed mainly of plagioclase with other minerals such as

hornblende, pyroxene and biotite.

Asthenosphere: A zone of the earth’s mantle that lies beneath the lithosphere and

consists of several hundred kilometres of deformable rock.

Arsenopyrite/Auriferous: Iron arsenic sulphide (FeAsS).

Basalt: The most common type of volcanic rock composed primarily of plagioclase

feldspar, pyroxene and olivine.

Basin: Large-scale structural formation of rock strata formed by tectonic warping of

previously flat lying strata.

Breccia: Rock composed of sharp-angled fragments embedded in a fine-grained matrix.

Caldera: A large crater formed by a volcanic explosion or by the collapse of a volcanic

cone.

Cēterīs paribus: A Latin phrase literally translated as "with other things the same," or "all

other things being equal;" and is often fundamental to the predictive purpose of scientific

inquiry, usually used to rule out factors that interfere with examining specific causal

relationships.

Conglomerate: Coarse-grained sedimentary rock consisting of rounded fragments of rock

embedded/cemented by hardened silt, clay, calcium carbonate or similar material.

Conjugate fault set: A cross-cutting set of fault planes which ideally intersect at angles of

60 and 120 degrees, and both have left-handed and right-handed shear sense. Maximum

principle of stress bisects the acute angle and the minimum principle of stress bisects the

obtuse angle.

Continental Drift/ Plate Tectonics: Continental Drift is a theory that the earth’s continents

move gradually over the surface of the planet on a substratum of magma, a theory which

has later been supplanted by plate tectonics, explaining the destruction, movement, and

interaction of the earth's lithospheric plates.

Convergent plate boundary: Also known as a destructive plate boundary (because of

subduction), is an actively deforming region where two or more tectonic plates or fragments

of lithosphere move toward one another and collide. As a result of pressure, friction and

plate material melting in the mantle, earthquakes and volcanoes are common near

convergent boundaries. An example of a continental-oceanic subduction zone is the area

along the west coast of South America, where the more dense Nazca plate is being

subducted beneath the relatively less dense continental South American plate.

Decrepitation: Breaking up mineral substances when exposed to heat, usually associated

with cracking noises.

Page 45: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 45 of 48

Glossary (cont.)

Divergent boundary: Also known as a constructive boundary, it is a linear feature that

exists between two tectonic plates that are moving away from each other. The most active

divergent plate boundaries are between oceanic plates and are often referred to as mid-

oceanic ridges. It appears that as a result of complex convection within the earth’s mantle,

material rises to the base of the lithosphere beneath the divergent plate boundary,

supplying vast melts from the asthenosphere, forming flood basalt lava flows, forcing the

two opposing plates away from each other.

Dyke: A tabular body of igneous rock that cuts across adjacent rocks.

Epithermal: Pertaining to mineral veins and ore deposits formed from warm waters at

shallow depth, at temperatures ranging from 80-200 degrees Celsius, and generally some

distance from the magmatic source.

Formation: A series of lithological units formed within a single depositional environment,

which may range from a metre to thousands of metres in thickness.

Geothermal: Refers to heat sources within the planet.

Geothermal gradient: The rate at which the earth’s temperature increases with depth,

which varies with location and is typically measured by determining bottom open-hole

temperature after drilling.

Hofstadter’s Law: it takes time for the people added to a project to become productive.

Hydrothermal: Of or relating to hot magmatic emanations rich in water, including rocks,

ore deposits, and springs produced by such emanations.

Igneous: Formed by solidification from a molten state.

Inelastic Supply: A market situation in which any increase or decrease in the price of

goods or services does not result in a corresponding increase or decrease in its supply.

Island arc: Arc shaped chain of islands, usually lying at the edge of a Benioff zone,

indicating volcanic activity, where oceanic lithosphere is descending into the earth’s interior.

Isostatic equilibrium: As huge plates of lithosphere “float” on denser, plastically flowing

rocks of the asthenosphere. The equilibrium, or balance between blocks of crust and the

underlying mantle, which is called isostasy.

Isothermal: A change in the system in which temperature remains constant.

Lacustrine: Of or relating to lakes.

Leached: Loss of soluble substances and colloids from the top layer of soil by percolating

precipitation. The lost materials are carried downward (eluviated) and are generally

redeposited (illuviated) in a lower layer. This transport results in a porous and open top

layer and a dense, compact lower layer. The rate of leaching increases with the amount of

rainfall, high temperatures, and the removal of protective vegetation.

Lithosphere: Brittle uppermost shell of the earth. The crust and mantle is separated by

the Mohorovicic discontinuity, its thickness varying between 1.6km at mid-ocean ridges,

and 300km in thickness beneath continental lithospheric plates.

Low-sulphidation: Distinction is based on the different sulphur to metal ratio within

sulphide minerals of each subtype.

Magmatic diapirs: A type of vertical intrusion along fractures or zones of structural

weakness, where molten material effectively rises through the lithosphere.

Mesothermal: A class of hydrothermal deposits by the deposition of a mineral mass from

hot mineralised aqueous solutions, usually under pressure forming at temperatures

between 200 to 300 degrees Celsius (compare with epithermal).

Page 46: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 46 of 48

Glossary (cont.)

Monocline: A set of rock layers that all slope downward from the horizontal in the same

direction.

Newtonian fluid: A fluid that continues to flow, regardless of the forces acting upon it, the

viscosity depending on temperature and pressure (and in certain cases, chemical

composition).

Oceanic trenches: A long, narrow, but very deep depression in the ocean floor where, at

the junction of two continental plates, one plate dives steeply beneath another thereby

penetrating the mantle.

pH: A measure of hydrogen ion concentration; a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a

solution. Aqueous solutions at 25°C with a pH less than seven are acidic or reduced, while

those with a pH greater than seven are basic or alkaline. A pH level of 7.0 at 25°C is

defined as neutral because the concentration of H3O+ equals the concentration of OH

− in

pure water.

Plate tectonics: A theory first espoused by Alfred Wegener, it holds that the lithosphere,

the hard outer layer (~100km thick), moves about on the earth’s surface, resting on a lower

softer layer called the asthenosphere. The mechanism is thought to be related to

convection in the earth’s mantle, but is presently unproven.

Placer Deposit: An accumulation of valuable minerals formed by gravity separation during

sedimentary processes. Placer materials must be both dense and resistant to weathering

processes. To accumulate in placers, mineral particles must be significantly denser than

quartz (specific gravity = 2.65), which is usually the most common component of sand or

gravel.

Platform: A general term for a sequence of shallow water carbonate platforms that form

commonly along passive margins.

Pyroclastic: Composed chiefly of rock fragments of volcanic origin, and may be composed

of a large range of clast sizes, from the largest agglomerates, to very fine ashes and tuffs.

Seismic: Caused by an earthquake or earth vibration.

Sandstone: A sedimentary rock composed mainly of sand-sized minerals of quartz and/or

feldspar.

Sedimentary basin: Refers to a geographical feature exhibiting subsidence and

consequent infilling of sedimentation.

Shear: Is in response to rock deformation via compressive stress that forms particular

textures. It can be homogeneous or non-homogeneous, pure or simple, within a brittle or

brittle-ductile regime.

Silicic: Pertaining to silica or acids derived from it.

Somma: A somma volcano is a volcanic caldera that has been partially filled by a new

central cone.

Structure: A branch of geology concerned with the form, arrangement, and internal

structure of the rocks.

Subduction: A geological process in which one edge of one crustal plate is forced below

another.

Tectonic: Closely related to the field of structural geology, the primary difference between

the two is a matter of scale.

Tertiary: Geologic time spanning the interval between about 65.5 and 2.6 million years

ago.

Tellurides: A class of compounds formally derived from Te2−

.

Page 47: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 47 of 48

Glossary (cont.)

Tholeiite: Group of basalts composed principally of plagioclase, pyroxene and iron oxide

minerals formed as phenocrysts in a glassy groundmass.

Tuff: A rock composed of compacted volcanic ash varying in size from fine sand to coarse

gravel.

Vent: The channel, way or opening of a volcano through which magma ascends to the

surface; two general types are fissure and pipe like vents.

Visco-elastic: A property of materials that exhibit both viscous and elastic characteristics

when undergoing deformation and, as such, exhibit time dependent strain.

Volcanic arcs: Typically, an arc-shaped chain of volcanoes located on the margin of the

overriding plate at a convergent plate boundary.

Page 48: Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC (Fiji) - Institutional Research LOWRES.pdf · Zesiger Capital Group 9.1% Black Rock (UK) 4.8% Rex Harbour 3.9% Capital Research Global 3.6% HD Capital Partners

Page 48 of 48

Institutional Research

Institutional Research Disclaimer

The information in this report has been prepared by HD Capital Partners LLP (HD Capital). Materials available herein have no

regard to the specific business objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. The research is

published for information purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related

financial instruments.

The opinions and estimates in this report constitute the current judgment and express views of the author as at the date of the

report and are based on the company’s own projections. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HD Capital and are

subject to change without notice.

Unless specifically stated otherwise, all price information is indicative only. No representation or warranty, either expressed or

implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the materials, nor are they a complete statement of

the securities, markets or development referred to herein. The material should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for

the exercise of their own judgment.

The financial instruments discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment

decisions using their own independent advisors as appropriate. The value of, and the income produced by, financial instruments

may fluctuate, so that investors may get back less than they invested. A change in the exchange rate may adversely affect the

value of, or the income derived from, financial instruments. Past performance does not guarantee future performance.

The analyst(s) responsible for covering the securities in this report may receive compensation based upon, among other factors,

the overall profitability of HD Capital which may, from time to time, perform corporate finance or other services for, or sol icit

corporate finance or other business from any company mentioned in this report.

HD Capital, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of

the use of all or part of these materials. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the written

permission of HD Capital. The information in this report is provided with the understanding that HD Capital is not acting in a

fiduciary capacity.

Certain laws and regulations impose liabilities which cannot be disclaimed. This disclaimer shall in no way constitute a waiver or

limitation of any rights a person may have under such laws and/or regulations. HD Capital is authorised and regulated by the

Financial Services Authority.

Declaration

I, Gaius Lucanus Lindsay King, the Author of this report, certify that the views expressed in this research accurately reflect my

personal views about the subject securities. No inducements have been offered or accepted by the company.

The recommendation made in this report is valid for four weeks from the stated date of issue. If in the event another report has

been constructed and released on Vatukoula Gold, the new recommendation supersedes this and therefore the recommendation

in this report will become null and void.

Copyright © 2012 HD Capital Partners LLP, all rights reserved. Additional information is available upon request.

HD Capital Partners LLP Aldermary House 10–15 Queen Street London, EC4N 1TX Tel: +44 (0) 20 3551 4870 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hd-captial.com


Recommended