SemiSemi--continuouscontinuous Benzene Monitoring Benzene Monitoring in Burlington, Vermontin Burlington, Vermont
Robert C. LacailladeVermont Department of Environmental Conservation
National Air Monitoring Conference November, 2009
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 2
Background
• Vermont DEC Awarded EPA Grant in 2006 – Local-Scale Air Toxics Ambient Monitoring Program Grant
RFA OAR-EMAD-05-18
• Grant Study Objectives– To assess spatial and temporal characteristics of benzene
in Burlington, Vermont– Evaluate and validate a benzene dispersion model
• Short-term Benzene Concentrations Beneficial– Semi-continuous analyzer viable alternative to
canisters/tubes
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 3
Overview
• Design Specs• Installation• Calibration• Data Handling, Validation & Reporting• Quality Assurance• Summary of 1-Hour Benzene Results• Comparisons to TO-15 (24hr & 6hr canisters)• Summary & Observations
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 4
“Syntec Spectras GC955 Series 600 BTEX Analyzer”• Designed to measure “BTEX” compounds in air
– benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes
• Computer Controlled Gas Chromatograph-PID – Embedded-PC running proprietary software– Windows XP, 40 Gigabyte HD, PC-Anywhere – 19” Standard Instrument Rack Mount– 10” integrated monitor, External keyboard & mouse
• Manufactured by Synspec (The Netherlands)– U.S. Distributor: Wilbur Technical Services, LLC
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 5
Design Specifications• Carrier gas- N2 (Ultra High Purity)
• Preconcentrator- Tenax GR• Column: 15 m x 0.32mm (ID)
– 95% dimethylpolysiloxane; 5% diphenylpolysiloxane
– 2-meter “stripper” column – 13-meter “analysis” column
• PID- 10.6 eV, 50 µl measurement cell• 15-minute analysis run time
per Sample• “Semi-continuous”; allows for
simultaneous collection of next air sample while previous sample is analyzed
• Design keys– 10-port valve– Preconcentrator– Precision sampling piston
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 6
Installation
• Burlington Monitoring Shelter – In downtown city parking lot on corner of 2 busy streets– Across street from a gas station and newspaper
publisher, next door to fire station
• Connected to Common Glass Sample Manifold – 1/8” Silco-coated stainless tubing– 2µ sintered-stainless particulate inlet filter
• Internet Connection via Dedicated DSL Line – Allows offsite communication, data review/download– Remote control via PC-Anywhere
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 7
Calibration Equipment• Software Calibration “mode”
– Linear /non-linear– optional “auto-linearization” function – Retention times verified/edited
• BTEX Calibration Gas – Spectra or Scott– 0.6 or 1 ppmv – 5% analytical accuracy w/ 1-yr cert.
• Zero Air– TEI Model 111
• Dilution Calibrator– Environics Model 6103
• 0-10 sccm gas MFC• 0-20 lpm Air MFC
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 8
Synspec Benzene Calibration
Synspec GC955Two-Tiered Calibration Approach for Benzene:Transition from Primary Range to High Range
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 1000000
PID Response
Con
c. (p
pbv)
Primary Range (0-2 ppbv) High Range (2-5 ppbv)
• Six-point Calibration – Input Levels: 0.07, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 ppbv• Two-tiered Approach
– Primary Range 0-2 ppbv (98% of measured values)– High Range 2-5 ppbv
• Non-linear Regression (software auto-linearization not utilized)– R2=0.9994– Method detection limit =0.04 ppb (y-intercept)[0-2 ppbv Calibration] [2-5 ppbv Calibration Transition]
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 9
Data Handling
• Chromatograms – Each 15-min sample analysis run is saved to a separate
binary file – Files can be viewed on analyzer or desktop (running Synspec
program) for review and validation
• Output File of Results– Results of each analysis written to a text file (PID response,
ppbv, retention time, operating parameters)– Text file is retrieved using PC-Anywhere and imported to
EXCEL and ACCESS for review and validation – 15-min values used to generate 1-hour averages
• 75% data averaging rule (minimum of 3, 15-min values for 1-hr avg.)
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 10
Data Validation• Performance Audits
• Review Text File With Excel/Access – Missing/suspect values– Retention time/operating
parameter verification– Flagging/validation
• Review Chromatograms of Selected Runs– Verify retention time,
peak area, identification, concentration
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 11
Data Validation (continued) & Reporting
• Visually Review Results Graphically
– Time series, fingerprint plots
– Scatter plot of benzene/toluene ratios for review of suspect values
• Valid 15-minute Results Reported to AQS
Synspec GC955 Benzene vs. Toluene 1-hour Avg. (ppbv) July 2007- June 2008
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
Benzene Concentration (ppbv)
Tolu
ene
Con
cent
ratio
n (p
pbv)
BTEX Retention Times July 2008
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
date time
Benz RT
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 12
Quality Assurance
• QAPP approved by EPA-New England
• Routine performance audit – MQO +/-15% Difference
• Biannual independent accuracy audit – “second source” gas standard– Independent dilution calibrator, zero air system – MQO +/-20% Difference
• Data capture– Quarterly DQO: 75%
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 13
Synspec GC955 Performance Audit Responses for Benzene at Various Inputs Levels (ppbv)
July 2007 - June 2009
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
6/27
/07
7/27
/07
8/27
/07
9/27
/07
10/2
7/07
11/2
7/07
12/2
7/07
1/27
/08
2/27
/08
3/27
/08
4/27
/08
5/27
/08
6/27
/08
7/27
/08
8/27
/08
9/27
/08
10/2
7/08
11/2
7/08
12/2
7/08
1/27
/09
2/27
/09
3/27
/09
4/27
/09
5/27
/09
6/27
/09
Ben
zene
(ppb
v)
0.26 0.52 1.05
2.04 2.1 2.12
ppbv input level
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 14
CV= 5.2% (Based on Equation 2 from 40CFRPart58, App.A)
Synspec GC955 Performance Audit Results for Benzene at Various Input Levels (% Difference)
July 2007 - June 2009
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
256/
27/0
7
7/27
/07
8/27
/07
9/27
/07
10/2
7/07
11/2
7/07
12/2
7/07
1/27
/08
2/27
/08
3/27
/08
4/27
/08
5/27
/08
6/27
/08
7/27
/08
8/27
/08
9/27
/08
10/2
7/08
11/2
7/08
12/2
7/08
1/27
/09
2/27
/09
3/27
/09
4/27
/09
5/27
/09
6/27
/09
% D
iffer
ence
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 2
ppbv input level
MQO +/- 15%
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 15
Synspec GC955 Independent Accuracy Audit Results
for BenzeneInput (ppbv)
Response (ppbv)
% Diff.
8/31/07 2.71 3.01 11.1
4/24/08 3.00 3.01 0.3
8/3/08 2.02 2.00 -1.0
5/12/09 1.080.54
1.010.50
-6.5-7.4
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 16
Benzene 1-Hour Averages for Local Scale Grant Study Period
Based on 15-minute values; 94% Valid Data Capture
Synspec GC955 Benzene 1‐Hour Average Concentrations (ppbv) Burlington, July 2007 ‐ June 2008
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
7/1/07
7/11
/07
7/22
/07
8/2/07
8/13
/07
8/24
/07
9/4/07
9/15
/07
9/26
/07
10/6/07
10/17/07
10/28/07
11/8/07
11/19/07
11/30/07
12/11/07
12/22/07
1/1/08
1/12
/08
1/23
/08
2/3/08
2/14
/08
2/25
/08
3/7/08
3/18
/08
3/28
/08
4/8/08
4/19
/08
4/30
/08
5/11
/08
5/22
/08
6/2/08
6/13
/08
6/23
/08
Date
Concen
tration (ppb
v)
Confirmed gas station delivery ~50-70m from trailer 8/29/2007
Confirmed gasoline spill near trailer 4/18/2008
Burlington GC955 Benzene 15-minute Average Concentration (ppbv)
4/18/08, 12:00-14:00 Hours
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00
Benz
ene
Conc
. (pp
bv)
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 17
Comparison of Synspec GC955 to TO-15 CanistersBenzene and Toluene 24-hour Averages Collocated (1/12th day)
at Burlington,Vermont July 2007-January 2009
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
6/23
/07
7/5/
077/
17/0
77/
29/0
78/
10/0
78/
22/0
79/
3/07
9/15
/07
9/27
/07
10/9
/07
10/2
1/07
11/2
/07
11/1
4/07
11/2
6/07
12/8
/07
12/2
0/07
1/1/
081/
13/0
81/
25/0
82/
6/08
2/18
/08
3/1/
083/
13/0
83/
25/0
84/
6/08
4/18
/08
4/30
/08
5/12
/08
5/24
/08
6/5/
086/
17/0
86/
29/0
87/
11/0
87/
23/0
88/
4/08
8/16
/08
8/28
/08
9/9/
089/
21/0
810
/3/0
810
/15/
0810
/27/
0811
/8/0
811
/20/
0812
/2/0
812
/14/
0812
/26/
081/
7/09
1/19
/09
1/31
/09
Date
ppbv
Benzene TO-15 (6L-canister, 24-hr sample) Toluene TO-15 (6L-canister, 24-hr sample)Benzene TO-15 Duplicate (6L-canister, 24-hr sample) Toluene TO-15 Duplicate (6L canister, 24-hr sample)Synspec Benzene (24-hour avg. of 15-min values) Synspec Toluene (24-hour avg. of 15-min values)
Synspec 24-hr averages based on average of 96 separate 15-minute values for each 1/12th-day run day; TO-15 results based on individual GC/MS analysis of 24-hour canister sample
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 18
Mean Absolute Difference= -0.05 ppbvCV=17% (Based on NATTS Equation 2.1.2)
Comparison of Synspec GC955 Benzene Results to TO-15 CanistersRelative % Difference & Absolute Difference of ppbv 24-hour Averages Collocated (1/12th day) at Burlington Site
July-2007 thru January-2009
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
506/
23/0
77/
5/07
7/17
/07
7/29
/07
8/10
/07
8/22
/07
9/3/
079/
15/0
79/
27/0
710
/9/0
710
/21/
0711
/2/0
711
/14/
0711
/26/
0712
/8/0
712
/20/
071/
1/08
1/13
/08
1/25
/08
2/6/
082/
18/0
83/
1/08
3/13
/08
3/25
/08
4/6/
084/
18/0
84/
30/0
85/
12/0
85/
24/0
86/
5/08
6/17
/08
6/29
/08
7/11
/08
7/23
/08
8/4/
088/
16/0
88/
28/0
89/
9/08
9/21
/08
10/3
/08
10/1
5/08
10/2
7/08
11/8
/08
11/2
0/08
12/2
/08
12/1
4/08
12/2
6/08
1/7/
091/
19/0
91/
31/0
9
Rel
ativ
e %
Diff
eren
ce
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Abs
olut
e D
iffer
ence
of p
pbv
Benzene %RPD Benzene Absolute Difference of ppbv
TO-15 MOQ for Collocated Samples=30%
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 19
Synspec GC955 Compared to TO-15 Canisters (Continued)
Comparison of Synspec GC955 and TO-15 Canisters Benzene 24-hour Averages (ppbv)
July 2007- January 2009 (n=46)
y = 1.27xR2 = 0.92
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70
Synspec 24-hour Average (ppbv)
TO-1
5 24
-hou
r Can
iste
r (pp
bv)
1:1
Comparison of Synspec GC955 and TO-15 Canisters Benzene 6-hour Averages (ppbv)
Four Separate 1-week Periods 2007-2008 (n=108)
y = 1.29xR2 = 0.93
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Synspec 6-hour Average (ppbv)TO
-15
6-hr
Can
iste
r (pp
bv)
1:1
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 20
Summary & Observations• Synspec is an Enhancement to Air Toxics Monitoring program
– Well designed and reliable– Consumables & maintenance reasonable– Provides real-time, short-term benzene concentrations– Analytical precision, accuracy and sensitivity comparable to TO-15– Collocated results compare well with TO-15 & NATTS performance-
based criteria
• Performance & Data Quality/Learning Curve– Requires time for analyzer and software familiarity – Trace level dilution calibrator improves low-level performance – Data review/validation more time intensive compared to “criteria”
analyzers
• Further Development & Study – Continue to improve low-end sensitivity and accuracy – Evaluate implementation of “auto-linearization” program function – Streamline data management, review and validation techniques
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 21
Acknowledgements
• Jenny Berschling, Project Lead, VTDEC• John Simone, QA Analyst-VTDEC• Heidi Hales, Air Toxics Coordinator- VTDEC• Vermont DEC Organics Lab • Tracey Footer, ERG (formerly VTDEC)• John Wilbur, Wilbur Technical Services• Michael Rijpkema, Synspec• Wouter Lautenbach, Synspec
November, 2009 Vermont DEC 22
Thank you, Opryland!
• Robert C. Lacaillade, Vermont DEC• (802) 241-3852 • [email protected]