VIE: Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project Dong Thap ......total of 49 persons are affected. 5...

Resettlement Plan Addendum November 2015

VIE: Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project Dong Thap Province Prepared by the Ministry of Transport for the Asian Development Bank. This is an addendum to the version of the draft originally posted in February 2013 available on http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/central-mekong-delta-connectivity-project-dong-thap-province-rp.

http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/central-mekong-delta-connectivity-project-dong-thap-province-rp

http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/central-mekong-delta-connectivity-project-dong-thap-province-rp

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars

This resettlement plan addendum is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Some information have been removed as they fall within exceptions to disclosure specified in paragraph 97, (x) of ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2011).

DONG THAP PROVINCE

RESETTLEMENT PLAN ADDENDUM

HOUSEHOLDS AFFECTED BY THE

CAO LANH BYPASS ROAD

November 2015

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

Central Mekong Delta Region

Connectivity Project (CMDCP)

Detailed Design, Procurement and Implementation Support Services

TA 7822-VIE

Central Mekong Delta Region

Connectivity Project (CMDCP)

Detailed Design, Procurement and Implementation Support Services

TA 7822-VIE

DONG THAP PROVINCE

RESETTLEMENT PLAN ADDENDUM

HOUSEHOLDS AFFECTED BY THE

CAO LANH BYPASS ROAD

November 2015

CMDCP Dong Thap province – Resettlement Plan Addendum

HH Affected by the Cao Lanh Bypass Road

Page i of iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................. 1

1.1 General .............................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Cao Lanh Bypass Road ....................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Additional Compensation Plans Prepared .......................................................................... 1

1.4 Need for an Addendum to the Resettlement Plan .............................................................. 2

2. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT .............................................................. 4

2.1 Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) ................................................................................ 4

2.2 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement ..................................................................... 4

2.2.1 Households affected ...................................................................................................... 4

2.2.2 Impacts for the AHs ........................................................................................................ 4

2.2.3 Socio-Economic Situation of the 11 Affected Households .............................................. 4

3. PROJECT POLICY AND ENTITLEMENT MATRIX........................................................................ 6

4. INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE ................................................... 8

4.1 Under Government Project ................................................................................................ 8

4.2 Consultation Conducted during Compensation Plan Preparation ....................................... 8

4.3 Consultation Conducted under CMCDP .............................................................................. 8

4.4 Disclosure .......................................................................................................................... 8

5. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET ....................................................................................................... 9

5.1 Preparation of New Compensation Plans ........................................................................... 9

5.2 Replacement Cost Survey................................................................................................... 9

5.3 Budget for Land Acquisition and Resettlement ................................................................ 10

7. DUE DILIGENCE .................................................................................................................... 12

7.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 12

7.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 12

7.3 Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 12

7.4 Findings of the Due Diligence Survey ............................................................................... 14

7.4.1 Policy and Standards Applied ........................................................................................ 14

7.4.2 Compensation for Productive land ............................................................................... 14

7.4.3 Compensation for Residential land ............................................................................... 15

7.4.4 Compensation for Trees, Crops and Structures ............................................................. 15

7.4.5 Allowances ................................................................................................................... 15

7.4.6 Public Consultation....................................................................................................... 16

7.5 Satisfaction of HH ............................................................................................................. 16

7.5.1 Compensation rates ..................................................................................................... 16

7.5.2 Household Income & Livelihood ................................................................................... 16

7.5.3 Reestablishment of Livelihood ...................................................................................... 17

7.6 Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................................... 20

7.7 Budget for Corrective Actions ........................................................................................... 20



Page ii of iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1: Details Impacts for each Affected Household in the new Section ...................................... 5

Table 3-1: Summary of Main Entitlements ......................................................................................... 6

Table 4-1: Summary of Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 8

Table 5-1: Comparison between RCS and PPC Rates for Land ............................................................ 9

Table 5-2: Budget for Compensation of the New Compensation Plans ............................................ 10

Table 6-1: Implementation Schedule ............................................................................................... 11

Table 7-1: Impacts of the Project ..................................................................................................... 13

Table 7-2: Compensation Rates Used for Agriculture Land (VND/m2).............................................. 14

Table 7-3: Compensation Rates Used for Residential Land (VND/m2) .............................................. 15

Table 7-4: Compensation Rates Used for Commercial/Industrial Land (VND/m2) ............................ 15

Table 7-5: Changes in Household Income as Reported by the HHs .................................................. 18

Table 7-6: Budget for Corrective Actions (Million VND) ................................................................... 21

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1 : Former Design of the Interchange................................................................................... 2

Figure 1-2 : New Design of the Interchange ....................................................................................... 2

Figure 1-3 : Location of the 10 HH Affected by the Cao Lanh Bypass and the CMDCP ........................ 3

LIST OF ANNEXES

Annex 1: Summary of Adjustment between Former and Additional Compensation Plans .................. 1

Annex 2: Photos of Affected Houses .................................................................................................. 4

Annex 3: Photos of Affected Land ...................................................................................................... 6

Annex 4: Letter of Approval of the Replacement Costs Survey .......................................................... 8

Annex 5: Valuation Certificate ......................................................................................................... 14

Annex 6: Complaint Submitted by 9 HH on 16 September 2015 ...................................................... 23



Page iii of iii

List of Abbreviations

ADB Asian Development Bank

AH/AP Affected Household / Affected Person

CHFLD Center for Housing and Land Fund Development

CIPM Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project

Management of Infrastructure

DARD Department of Agriculture & Rural Development

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

DOLISA Department of Labour, War, Invalids & Social Affairs

EA Executing Agency

FS Feasibility Study

HH Household

IA Implementing Agency

IOL Inventory of Losses

LURC Land Use Right Certificate

MOT Ministry of Transport

PC People’s Committee

PPTA Project Preparation Technical Assistance

RCS Replacement Cost Study

ROW Right of Way

RP Resettlement Plan

VND Vietnam Dong (currency)

WU Women’s Union



Page 1 of 21

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

1.1 General

1. The project will improve connectivity in the Mekong Delta Region and will provide efficient

access from Ho Chi Minh City to the Southern Coastal Region through construction of two cable

stayed bridges across the Mekong River and associated roads. The project will go through Dong Thap

Province and Can Tho City.

2. A Resettlement Plan (RP) for Dong Thap Province was prepared and approved by ADB on 5

April 2013. The RP covered the RoW, the construction yards and the 4 interchanges.

1.2 Cao Lanh Bypass Road

3. In An Binh commune, the Department of Transport (DOT) of Dong Thap province is building a

15 km bypass of Cao Lanh City. The start of this bypass is located at the location of the interchange

with NH30 under the CMDCP (see Figure 1.1). Compensation started in 2010; most of the land was

acquired and cleared however the project stopped at the end of 2012 due to lack of funds. We should

note that the project is not officially cancelled and will resume when funds will be available. Land

clearance is almost completed for the 15 km. Land acquired was compensated, cleared and sand

pumped in the RoW. Land cannot be returned for agriculture production.

4. The design of the interchange was revised during detailed design at the end of 2012. The ramp

of the interchange was modified to follow the alignment of the bypass in order to use existing

acquired RoW and reduce resettlement. Figures 1.2 & 1.3 present the overlap between the 2 projects.

5. Most of the HH under the local project were compensated in 2010 and handed over their land.

There are 10 HHs who have not been compensated under the previous Government project because

they refused to receive compensation due to low compensation rate for residential land.

1.3 Additional Compensation Plans Prepared

6. The approved RP didn’t cover these HH as they were supposed to be compensated under the

DOT Project. Therefore, these AH were not considered as AH under the CMDCP. To solve the

grievance related to low compensation rate for residential land, Dong Thap PPC in Notice No. 60/TB-

VPUBND dated 13 February 2015, decided to apply unit rates under the CMDCP for these HH.

7. On 12 March 2015, CHFLD submitted additional compensation plans for these 10 HH to the

Appraisal Committee of Dong Thap PPC. The compensation plans intended to cover the differences

(entitlements, compensation rates etc.) between the first plan, prepared according to PPC policy in

2009-2010, and the policy under CMDCP. However PPC requested CHLFD to update the DMS

prepared in 2009 and to prepare a new budget (not an additional budget) based on the CMDCP Policy

and new DMS. Compensation plans were re-submitted on 12 August 2015. Final compensation plans

were approved on 31st August 2015 by Dong Thap PPC (Decision No: 897/QĐ-UBND-HC).

8. In the MOU prepared following the May 2015 ADB/DFAT review mission, the Mission

indicated having no objection to use loan funds to finance resettlement costs for the HH affected by

the government-funded Cao Lanh bypass road who are now within the Project’s right-of-way. The

mission indicated that a RP Addendum has to be prepared and submitted to ADB for review and

concurrence.

9. In addition, the Mission requested CIPM to carry out due diligence for the other HH, who

already received compensation and who were also located in Project’s right-of-way, to identify if

there are any outstanding issues when land acquisition activities were carried out in 2010. The due

diligence is presented in Chapter 7 of this report.



Page 2 of 21

1.4 Need for an Addendum to the Resettlement Plan

10. This RP addendum describes the new impacts related to this bypass, the consultations

conducted, the additional costs and the new implementation schedule.

Figure 1-1 : Former Design of the Interchange

Figure 1-2 : New Design of the Interchange



Page 3 of 21

Figure 1-3 : Location of the 10 HH Affected by the Cao Lanh Bypass and the CMDCP

20 HH already compensated

Location of the 10 HH with grievances



Page 4 of 21

2. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

2.1 Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS)

11. The data collected during the DMS constitute the formal basis for determining AHs’

entitlements and levels of compensation. A first DMS was conducted by the Center for Housing and

Land Fund Development (CHFLD) of Dong Thap Province in 2009. This DMS was updated on 11

August 2015 for the 10 HH.

12. A first compensation plan was prepared in 2009 following national and provincial regulations.

A new compensation plan was submitted in 2015 based on the CMDCP policy. The new

compensation plan is also based on the updated DMS conducted in August 2015.

2.2 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

2.2.1 Households affected

13. The additional compensation plans cover the 10 AHs not yet compensated (see Table 2-1). A

total of 49 persons are affected. 5 HH belongs to the same family (Mrs. Nguyen Thi Ba and her 4

children: Dang Kim Hung, Dang Kim Toi, Dang Thi Ngoc Bich and Dang Thi Kim Loan).

2.2.2 Impacts for the AHs

• Land acquisition

14. The 10 HH will request acquisition of 1,148 m2 of land. Most of the affected land is residential

(955.4 m2). Little garden land will be acquired (193.1 m2). 5 HH will lose trees. Due to little productive

land affected, no severely affected HHs is present. None of the HH depends on productive land for

their income. Two HH raise pigs but on their residential land.

• Structures affected

15. 7 AHs will have their main house totally affected and will need to relocate. All the 7 AHs opted

to move to My Tho Relocation Site (RS); this RS is located 4km from their current location close to

NH30. CHLFD allocated to the 7 HH a plot of land in My Tho RS on 9 October 2015. A plot of land is

72 m2 (4.5 m x 16 m). My Tho RS is a fully serviced RS; all infrastructures have been completed at the

end of 2013. 37 plots have already been allocated in My Tho RS for HH affected under the CMDCP

and 8 HH built a house.

16. Quality of houses is generally low, built mainly with temporary materials (see photos in Annex

2). 1 grave, belonging to Mr. Dang Kim Hung, will also be affected

2.2.3 Socio-Economic Situation of the 11 Affected Households

• Source of Income

17. As indicated in Table 2.1, the 10 AHs derive their income from various sources (i.e. 6 HH rely

on hired labor, 2 on business and 1 on raising pigs and 1 on hired labor and raising pigs).

• Poor and vulnerable HH

18. One HH, Mrs. Dang Thi Ngoc Bich is landless (built house on her mother’s land – Nguyen Thi

Ba. No other poor or vulnerable HH are present. All other AHs have a LURC.

• Services

19. The AHs with house affected are connected to the city water supply network and the public

electrical network.

20. Table 2.1 presents the impacts and socioeconomic information for each of the 10 AHs.


10 HH Affected by the Cao Lanh Bypass Road

Page 5 of 21

Table 2-1: Details Impacts for each Affected Household in the new Section

NO Name Numbers

of

persons

in Family

Res. Land

affected

(m2)

Garden

land

affected

Trees

affected

LURC House

affected

Will require

relocation

Source of Income Vulnerable

HH

1 Nguyen Thi Ba 4 198 87.4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Hired labor:

10M/Month

No

2 Dang Van Toi 7 60 42.5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Hired labor

3 M/ month

No

3 Dang Kim Hung 3 60 50.8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Hired labor No

4 Dang Kim Loan 3 80 6.7 No Yes No Yes Hired labor

3,5 M/ Month

No

5 Nguyen Van

Dung

9 190 5.7 Yes Yes No Yes Raise pig, hired

labour

10 M/month

No

6 Doan Van Lo 2 81.6 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Raise pig

2M/month

No

7 Bui Thanh Liem 7 47.3 0 No Yes No No Business of

construction

materials

50 M/month

No

8 Bui Nguyen

Trung Hieu

7 40.3 0 No Yes No No Business of

construction

materials

50 M/month

No

9 Nguyen Thanh

Qui

3 198.2 0 No Yes Yes Yes Hired labor

No

10 Dang Ngoc

Bich

4 0 0 No No Yes Yes Hired labor:

9M/Month

Yes

Landless

Total 49 955.4 193.1



Page 6 of 21

3. PROJECT POLICY AND ENTITLEMENT MATRIX

21. A new Land Law came into force on 1st July 2014. Circular 37/2014 /TT- BTNMT1 issued by MONRE on 30 June 2014 to implement the land law indicates, in Chapter III Article 14, that for projects where resettlement framework was approved by the Prime Minister before the 1st July then the provisions of the new Land Law will not apply.

22. It was confirmed by CHFLD Dong Thap that based on this Circular, because compensation was provided by tranche from 2012 to 2014 based on approved resettlement framework, then additional compensation under the CMCDP, even after the 1st July 2014, is not submitted to the provision of the new land law and related decrees

23. All AHs under the CMDCP, including these 10 new AHs, are entitled to the policy identified in the RP for Dong Thap Province and approved by ADB on 5 April 2013. The approved compensation plans are based on the same entitlements than other HH affected under the CMDCP in An Binh commune.

24. The new affected households are entitled to various types of entitlements according to their loss and impacts based on the Entitlement Matrix included in the RP for Dong Thap Province. Table 3-1 summarizes the main entitlements. These entitlements are reflected in the additional compensation plans submitted to PPC.

Table 3-1: Summary of Main Entitlements

Impact/ Loss Eligible Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues

Loss of Productive Land (garden land)

Households or persons with (i) LURC; or (ii) in the process of acquiring LURC (iii) are eligible to acquire LURC according to the regulations of GoV;

5HH

- Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification, and administration costs).

- If garden land is within the residential area, cash assistance amounting to a maximum 50% of current market price of adjacent residential land.

- If the area of the remaining land is not viable (< 1000 m2 for rural area and 500 m2 for urban area (Decision 57/2007, Art. 4(1)) and if the AH so agrees, then the remaining portion of land will be acquired according to the project’s resettlement policy.

Loss of Residential Land with and/or without structures

Households or persons with (i) LURC; or (ii) in the process of acquiring LURC (iii) are eligible to acquire LURC according to the regulations of GoV;

9HH

- Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification, and administration costs) at the time of compensation.

- AHs with house affected are entitled to buy a minimum of one plot of land of 90 m2 in a serviced relocation site (Art. 13(1c));

- If the area of the remaining land with structure is not viable: i) 60 m2 for rural area and ii) 40 m2 for urban area (Decision 57/2007, Art.4(2)) and if the AH so agrees, then the remaining portion of land will be acquired

1 Circular 37/2014 /TT- BTNMT on Detail regulations of compensation, support , resettlement when land is acquired by Government;

CMDCP Dong Thap province – Resettlement Plan Addendum HH Affected by the Cao Lanh Bypass Road

Page 7 of 21

Impact/ Loss Eligible Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues

according to the project’s policy

Loss of House Owners with or without acceptable proof of rights over the land; with or without building permit.

7HH

- Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to the current market value of a newly built structure and with no depreciation or deduction for salvageable materials.

- Cash allowance sufficient for the transport of household effects to the new residence;

- Life stabilization allowance to support the HH during the period of transition while establishing a new house;

- For those without alternative accommodation and are waiting for resettlement land/house at a resettlement site shall receive the amounts for rental assistance as follow: 900 000 vnd/ HH/month in urban area and 700 000 vnd / HH /month in rural area for 6 months.

-

Impacts on Trees

Owners regardless of land tenure status

5 HH

- For perennial crops trees, cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation.

- For bonsai: Cash compensation to remove the decorative tree; If AH cannot remove the decorative tree, cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive value.

- APs have the right to use salvageable trees.

- APs will be given 3 months’ notice prior to land acquisition

-

Graves Affected household 1HH

- All costs of excavation, relocation and reburial will be reimbursed in cash to the affected family as follow: - Earth grave: 6,000,000 VND /

grave;

- Built grave: 8,000,000 VND /grave;

- Semi – solid Grave: 10,000,000 VND / tomb (Art 6,decision 08/2008/QĐ-UBND)

- Graves to be exhumed and relocated in culturally and spiritually sensitive manner.

Vulnerable HH 1 HH Dang Thi Ngoc Bich

- Vulnerable HH (1 landless HH) will receive a cash allowance of 7 M VND/HH (Art. 20 (1))

- Entitled to participate to the income restoration program (IRP)

-


Page 8 of 21

4. INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

4.1 Under Government Project

25. Notice of Land Acquisition No 14/TB-UBND was issued on 28 May 20102. The notice indicates that land will be acquired to carry out bypass for NH 30 , section : Cao Lanh- Hong Ngu in An Binh Commune, Phong My commune and Cao Lanh city

4.2 Consultation Conducted during Compensation Plan Preparation

26. Table 4.1 indicates meetings conducted by local authorities with HH affected by the local bypass.

Table 4-1: Summary of Public Consultation

Date Location Purpose Notes

29 June 2010 An Binh commune

- Disclosure of Notice of Land Acquisition

- Minute No01/BBLV/HM01.H/ 10-08/PTQĐ dated 30 June 2010

21 December 2010

An Binh commune

- Disclosure of proposed plan for compensation, support and resettlement for section:

- Minute No05 /BBLV/HM01.H/ 10-08/PTQĐ dated 21 December 2010

4.3 Consultation Conducted under CMCDP

27. DDIS conducted a meeting with AH on 16 June 2015 to collect information and give general information on the project (location of plots of every HH and overlap with CMDCP project, content and status of additional compensation plan). During this meeting the Public Information Brochure (PIB) was distributed and explained to AHs.

28. Due to the limited number of HH, local authorities conducted individual meetings during the preparation of the new DMS on 11 August 2015 among the 10 AHs. During the preparation of DMS the following information was delivered to the 10 AH: i) Project policy; iii) compensation rates; iii) support and allowances; iv) option for relocation; and v) grievance procedures.

29. Regarding RS, HH already opted to be relocated in My Tho RS in 2010. Most of the AHs are relatives and want to be relocated in the same RS.

4.4 Disclosure

30. The compensation plans were disclosed in An Binh commune PC office on 3 September 2015.

31. On 8 of September, CHLFD invited all the 10 AHs to receive compensation. 7 AHs accepted and 3 refused (Dang Van Toi, Dang Kim Hung and Dang Kim Loan). Dang Van Toi finally accepted the proposed compensation by the end of September 2015.

32. Two HH (Dang Kim Hung and Dang Kim Loan) first refused compensation and sent a complaint to CHLFD. Ms. Dang Kim Loan wanted to receive additional support and Mr. Dang Kim Hung complained regarding the categorization of his land; he wanted his land to be considered as category 1 (currently divided in categories 2 and 3). Following discussion between CHLFD and the 2 HH, the complaints were solved and the 2 HH received compensation by the end of October.

2 Notice of Land Acquisition was introduced by Decree 69/2009 after the start of the Project. DMS was conducted earlier

in 2009 under Decree 84/2007.


Page 9 of 21

5. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET

5.1 Preparation of New Compensation Plans

33. New compensation plans submitted to Dong Thap PPC use the same rates as AHs under the CMDCP. The Appraisal Committee reviewed the new compensation plans on 19 March 2015 and submitted comments. Following comments from the Committee, CHFLD submitted the revised plans to PPC on 22 June 2015. PPC (DONRE) requested CHLFD to update the DMS and to prepare a new budget (not an additional budget) based on the CMDCP policy and on the new DMS. Compensation plans were re-submitted on the 12 August 2015 and approved on 31st August 2015 by Dong Thap PPC (Decision No: 897/QĐ-UBND-HC).

34. The new compensation plans submitted to Dong Thap PPC replace the compensation plans prepared in 2010 and follow the CMDCP resettlement policy.

35. Table 5.2 presents the summary of costs for the new approved compensation plans. The costs were calculated based on the CMDCP policy with the approved compensation rates under the CMDCP for all types of compensation.

5.2 Replacement Cost Survey

36. An independent appraisal agency, the Southern Information and Appraisal Corporation (SIAC), conducted a Replacement Costs Survey (RCS) on 17 October 2014 for the CMDCP in An Binh commune. Dong Thap PPC approved the replacement costs survey on 27 November 2014. Approval letter by Dong Thap PC is presented in Annex 3. Results of the RCS are presented in Annex 5.

37. The following table indicated the differences, for the main types of land, between new compensation rates based on RCS and PPC rates.

Table 5-1: Comparison between RCS and PPC Rates for Land

PPC rates in

2014

CMDCP rates

2014

Difference

Residential land along NH30

(location I)

1,260,000 5,860,000 460 % of PPC rates

Garden land 85,000 130,000 150 % of PPC rates

38. External valuer also conducted a replacement cost survey for structures, trees and crops in 2014. No major differences were found with PPC rates and compensation rates of Decision No 16/2012/QĐ-UBND dated 12/6/2012 by Dong Thap PC will be used.

39. Annex 4 presents the valuation certificate issued by SIAC regarding the various compensation rates. The certificate is still valid and are still the basis for compensation for PPC. The valuation certificate includes the following appendixes:

− appendix 03: compensation rates for land;

− appendix 04: compensation rates for structures;

− appendix 05: compensation rates for trees and crops

40. Compensation rates for land (5.860,000 VND/m2) have been approved by PPC in May 2015 and were applied to all HH in the same situation (i.e. losing residential land along NH30) between June and July 2015.


Page 10 of 21

5.3 Budget for Land Acquisition and Resettlement

41. On 31 August 2015, PPC approved a new budget of 6,437,272,000 VND equivalent to 287,400 USD3. This budget is presented in Table 5.2

Table 5-2: Budget for Compensation of the New Compensation Plans

Total cost for compensation and support 6,249,779,246

1. Compensation for land 5,117,413,700

Residential land (946,4m2) 4,821,901,000

Perennial land (193,10 m2) 25,103,000

Support 50% residential price is same location (193,10m2) 270,409,700

2 Compensation for non-land assets 900,264,546

Compensation for house and substructure (08 HHs) 895,876,546

Compensation for planted trees (05 HHs) 4,388,000

3. Allowance and other support 232,100,000

a. Life Stabilization allowance ( 38 People) 151,200,000

b. Relocation allowance ( 7 HHs) 28,000,000

c. Rental allowance ( 7 HHs) 29,400,000

d. Support for relocation of electric meter (6 units) 2,600,000

e. Support for relocation of water meter ( 6 units) 1,800,000

f. Support for relocation of telephone set ( 3 sets) 600,000

g. Support for relocation of drilled well ( 01 well) 1,500,000

h. Support for relocation of grave ( 01 grave) 10,000,000

i. Support for vulnerable group (01 HH) 7,000,000

Administrative costs (1+ 2 + 3 ) x 3% = 6,249,778,246 x 3% 187,493,347

5.Total compensation and support

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 6,437,271,593

Rounded up : 6,437,272,000

3 Exchange rate : 1USD = 22,400 VND


Page 11 of 21

6. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

42. All resettlement activities will be coordinated with the civil works schedule. The Executing Agency will not allow construction activities in affected sites until all resettlement activities have been satisfactorily completed, agreed rehabilitation assistance is in place, and that the site is free of all encumbrances.

Table 6-1: Implementation Schedule

RP Preparation Starting Date

Consultation, RCS, DMS, Disclosure of key information in the RP 2009- 2015

DMS 2009

Approval of Replacement Cost Survey October 2014

First submission of compensation plans 12 March 2015

Collect choice of activity for AHs entitled to the IRP June 2015

Update DMS 11 August 2015

Second submission of compensation plans 12 August 2015

Approval of compensation plans 31 August 2015

Submission to ADB for Review and Concurrence September 2015

Disbursement of Compensation and Payment to AHs September 2015

Allocation of plots of land in My Tho RS 9 October 2015

Relocation of AHs and Clearing of land Fourth quarter of 2015

Submission of internal monitoring reports Quarterly (2013-2017)

Submission of external monitoring reports 2013-2015 (Semi-Annual)

Start of civil works (Package CW1A) January 2015


Page 12 of 21

7. DUE DILIGENCE

7.1 Background

43. In the MOU prepared for the May 2015 ADB/DFAT mission, the Mission requested CIPM and DDIS consultant to carry out due diligence for the households, affected by the Cao Lanh bypass, who already received compensation and who were also located in the Project’s RoW. The purpose of this due diligence is to assess if there are any outstanding issues when land acquisition activities were carried out in 2010.

44. The due diligence report examines (i) the requirements of the approved resettlement documentation and the extent to which these requirements have been satisfied by the project, (ii) compliance with national laws and regulations on land acquisition and social issues; and (iii) aspects where significant discrepancies exist between the observed outcomes of the resettlement implementation and objectives of ADB social safeguards policies.

45. We should note that, at the time of the compensation of the HH (2010 and 2011), these HH were not affected by the CMDCP Project. Change of design was approved at the end of 2012. They were compensated under the provincial department of transport project.

46. The due diligence study covers the Land Acquisition and Resettlement for the 20 HH affected by both the Cao Lanh bypass and the CMDCP and who have already been compensated and handed over land.

7.2 Methodology

47. Due diligence was conducted on 15-16 June and on 23 June 2015. Among the 20 HH, 18 could be contacted and interviewed. The following activities were conducted:

- Meetings with stakeholders (An Binh commune people’s committees, Center for Housing and Land Fund Development of Dong Thap Province);

- Meetings with affected persons and site visits;

- Implementation of a survey among all affected HH (household questionnaire) during meetings;

7.3 Impacts

48. Land acquisition was publicly announced on 28 May 2010. Notice of land acquisition included information on the project and its impacts to the AHs. Compensation took place between in 2010 and 2011. Land were handed over following compensation in 2010.

49. Land acquisition for the 20 HH represents 6557.1 m2 of land. Agriculture land represents 49%, residential land 19%, garden land 3% and other land (industrial land occupied by brick kilns) 27%. All land affected was compensated and handed over. All HH had a Land Use Right Certificate on their affected land.

50. 5 HH lost agriculture land. Among these 5 HH, 3 HH: Đoàn Hữu Thảo, Trịnh Văn Theo and Dương Thành Thi lost more than 10% of their productive land (respectively 13,8, 57.2 and 17,6%).

51. 11 HH lost residential land. Among these 11HH, 4 HH have their main house affected. 3 HH could reorganize on their remaining land while 1 HH, Mrs. Huynh Thi Phi, had his main house totally affected and had to relocate. She opted for self-relocation in 2010.


Page 13 of 21

52. We should note that among the 20 HH, 4 HH: Đoàn Hữu Hiếu, Đoàn Hữu Thảo, Trịnh Văn Theo and Dương Thành Thi are also affected by the CMDCP Project. Mr. Trịnh Văn Theo and Mr. Dương Thành Thi are also participating in the IRP under the CDMCP (losing respectively 29% and 11% of their productive land under the CMDCP).

53. Table 7.1 presents the detailed impacts for each HH.

Table 7-1: Impacts of the Project

Agriculture

land

Residential

land

Garden

Land

Other

land

Total

land

% ag.

Land

affected

House/

structures

affected

Relo-

cated

1 Thái Văn Anh 102,9 102,9 52,53 No

2 Nguyễn Thành Được 52,1 52,1

3 Nguyễn Thị Bé Hai 85,6 85,6

4 Đoàn Hữu Hiếu 223,2 223,2 9,88%

5 Đoàn Thị Ánh Hồng 261,7 261,7

6 Phạm Phi Hùng 1761,14 1761,1 91,8 No

7 Nguyễn Văn Kiều 141,3 26,8 168,1

8 Nguyễn Thị Lệ 115,3 115,3

9 Thái Văn Liêm 145,9 145,9

10 Phạm Văn Minh 15,3 34 49,3

11 Nguyễn Văn Nhạn 90,6 90,6 51,48 No

12 Huỳnh Thị Phi 177,4 177,4 57,34 Yes

13 Nguyễn Văn Bé Tám 78,8 78,8

14 Đoàn Văn Tùng 70,4 70,4

15 Đoàn Hữu Thảo 721,9 721,9 17,64%

16 Trịnh Văn Theo 1290,1 1290,1 57,17%

17 Dương Thành Thi 920,4 920,4 13,87%

18 Nguyễn Thị Bích Thủy 39,8 39,8 1,96%

19 Nguyễn Phương Trinh 130,8 130,8

20 Nguyễn Thanh Vũ 71,7 71,7

3195,4 1278,1 322,5 1761,1 6557,1 253,15

4 Commercial/industrial land (kilns)


Page 14 of 21

7.4 Findings of the Due Diligence Survey

7.4.1 Policy and Standards Applied

54. The legal framework and principles applied in the implementation of the resettlement was the relevant national Government legislations and Dong Thap Province People’s Committee Decisions at the time of the start of the implementation in 2010. The legal documents comprise:

- Decree No.197/2004/ND-CP, extends eligibility and provides additional entitlements, compensation and assistance over previous legislation.

- Decree 69/2009/ND-CP of 13/8/2009 (Supplementary Regulations Regarding Land Use Planning, Land Pricing, Land Acquisition, Compensation, Assistance and Resettlement)

- Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND regarding compensation, support and resettlement where the state acquires land in Dong Thap Province.

- Decision No 08/2008/QD- UBND dated 04/03/2008 of Dong Thap PPC issued Regulations on compensation prices for cultivated crops, domestic animals, cost for relocating grave when Government recovers land in Dong Thap province

- Decision No 15/2010/QD0-UBND dated 14/6/2010 of Dong Thap PPC of issue on standard price table for house and substructures constructed new and applying on Dong Thap province

- Decision No 29/2009/QD- UBND dated 21/12/2009 of Dong Thap PPC issued Regulations on compensation , support and resettlement when Government recovers land in Dong Thap province

- Decision No 28/2009/QD- UBND dated 23/12/2009 of Dong Thap PPC issued Regulations on prices for land categories in Dong Thap province;

7.4.2 Compensation for Productive land

55. Households were compensated based on Dong Thap Provincial People’s Committee rates applicable at the time (Decision No.08/2008/QD-UBND). Compensation rates for agricultural and residential land depends on the distance of the road (Location 1: from 0 to 150 m; Location 2 from 150 to 300 m; Location 4: from 300 to 450 m; Location 4; over 450 m (see Table below).

56. In addition farmers received the allowance for occupation change equivalent to 3 times the compensation rate for agricultural land per m2 for the area acquired but not exceeding 3 ha (Decision 29/2009 art. 16 (1) b).

57. Some HHs whose agriculture land is located along the road, received an allowance corresponding to 50% of the compensation rate for residential land instead of the allowance for occupation change.

58. Relocated HH also received the stabilization allowance (30 kg of rice per month per capita for 12 months) equivalent to 4,000,000 VND.

Table 7-2: Compensation Rates Used for Agriculture Land (VND/m2)

No Type of land Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4

1 Annual land 42,000 36,000 30,000 27,000

2 Perennial land 60,000 52,000 45,000 40,000


Page 15 of 21

7.4.3 Compensation for Residential land

59. Households affected trough residential land were compensated based on Dong Thap Provincial People’s Committee rates applicable at the time of implementation (Decision No.29/2009/QD-UBND). Compensation rates depends also on the location as presented in Table 7.3.

Table 7-3: Compensation Rates Used for Residential Land (VND/m2)

No Location Rate

1 Zone II, location 1 1,260,000

2 Zone II, location 2 600,000

3 Zone II, location 3 360,000

4 Zone III, location 2 71,000

60. One HH, Mr. Pham Phi Phung, is losing commercial/industrial land (brick kilns). His land was compensated at 70% of compensation rate for residential land in the same zone for the same location as presented in Table 7.4.

Table 7-4: Compensation Rates Used for Commercial/Industrial Land (VND/m2)

No Location Area (m2)

Residential land

Commercial/Industrial land

Amount (VND)

A B C D E = 70%*D F = C*E

1 Zone II, location 1 206.4 1,200,000 840,000 173,376,000

2 Zone II, location 2 253.8 600,000 420,000 106,596,000

3 Zone II, location 3 811.4 360,000 252,000 204,472,800

4 Zone III, location 2 396.0 71,000 49,700 19,681,200

7.4.4 Compensation for Trees, Crops and Structures

61. For houses and structures, trees and crops, compensation rates used were based on Decision No 15/2010/ QĐ-UBND of issue of standard prices for house and structure applying in Dong Thap province and Decision No 08/2008/QĐ-UBND of issue of compensation unit prices for trees, domestic animal and grave remove).

7.4.5 Allowances

62. As specified in the Dong Thap policy, the AHs also received a number of allowance as follow:

- Allowance for occupation change (for HH affected through loss of agriculture land)

equivalent to 3 times the compensation rate for agriculture land per m2 for the area acquired but not exceeding 3 ha (Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND art. 16 (1) b).

- Transport allowance (Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND art. 12)

- Life Stabilization allowance (Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND, Art. 14) This allowance was given to HH who are losing between 30% and 70% and more than 70;

- Rental assistance (Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND Art. 12 (2)) For those without alternative accommodation and are waiting for resettlement land/house at a resettlement;


Page 16 of 21

- Infrastructure Development Grant

Those who choose to relocate individually received a lot infrastructure development grant (Decision 29/2009/QD-UBND Art. 13 (2) b))

7.4.6 Public Consultation

63. Public meetings were conducted in An Binh Commune in 2010 and 2011. Detailed information is provided in Table 3.1.

7.5 Satisfaction of HH

7.5.1 Compensation rates

64. Based on survey conducted, all 18 HH complained about the lower rates especially for residential land and agriculture land. Compensation rates were the ones issued by PPC in 2009 and 2010 and were lower than market rates as assessed by external valuer in 2012 in the same area for the CMDCP5. We should note that HH are now aware of compensation rates under the CMDCP in the same area.

65. On 16 September 2015, 9 of the 18 HH submitted a written complaint to CHLFD to increase the compensation rates for land based on compensation rates used for the CMDCP along NH30 (see Annex 5). All the 9 HH are affected by residential land along NH 30. In October 2015, the 20 HH also submitted a collective grievance requesting additional compensation based on compensation rates under the CMDCP.

66. On 9 October, CHLFD submitted these grievances to Cao Lanh District through a letter for review and decision. In this letter, CHLFD indicated that the HH have the right to lodge these grievances as they are in the same situation as the 10 HH compensated in September based on the CMDCP compensation rates (see chapters 1 to 6).

7.5.2 Household Income & Livelihood

67. The household survey obtained information regarding household income and livelihood of individual household. Regarding household income, among the 18 HH, where information was available, 14 reported no change in income, 3 HH lower income and 1 higher.

68. Regarding the 3 HH who reported to have lower income, their situation is as follow:

- Mr. Doan Huu Hieu lost 223 m2 of agriculture land under the local project; however he has his remaining part of agricultural land in the loop of the interchange (2035.8 m2); currently, this remaining land is cultivated and irrigated normally. However, Mr. Hieu indicated that he cannot cultivate his land due to lack of irrigation in the loop. The loss of income reported is not due to the impacts of the CMDCP

- Before land acquisition, Mr. Phạm Phi Hùng had a brick kiln; he could earn as much as 100 M VND/month. Under the local project he lost 1,667.60 m2 of dedicated land for brick production on a total of 5.661,00 m2 (30%). He still have a brick kiln but his production is much lower and income decreased to 10 M đ/month. With the compensation he received he bought gold and he still keeping the same amount of gold. He continues his brick production however due to the high cost for materials and labour there is now little profit according to him. He didn’t receive allowance for loss of business because his business was not stopped.

5 No specific survey was conducted for the Cao Lanh bypass project as compensation rates were based on unit rates

issued by PPC. The replacement cost survey conducted in the same area for the CMDCP is used as reference.


Page 17 of 21

Currently Mr. Hung is not in a difficult situation. He has still a regular income from brick production and kept all the compensation he received (changed cash in gold). He lost 30% of land dedicated for brick kiln but declared 90% loss of income. Decrease of income also comes from the economic situation regarding brick production.

- Mrs. Nguyen Thi Le had her residential land along NH30 which was a good location for business. Due to land acquisition she had to move back of 8 m and the location is now not so close to HW 30, with less business opportunity.

69. For five other HH, Nguyễn Thị Bé Hai, Phạm Văn Minh, Trịnh Văn Theo, Dương Thành Thi and Nguyễn Thanh Vũ, even if they maintained their income (see Table 7-5), they feel that their situation is worse than before. This is the case of Mr. Trịnh Văn Theo and Mrs. Dương Thành Thi who cannot cultivate land in the loop of the interchange (see photos in Annex 3). Because the irrigation ditches were blocked at the end of the dry season (May 2015), they don’t have currently significant effects on their production; during the rainy season, they can cultivate. However they anticipate loss of income for the next dry season.

70. Regarding Mr. Nguyễn Thanh Vũ, he is operating a saw mill. His house was affected but not the saw mill close to his former the house. He complained of low compensation rates but his income was not affected by the land acquisition. Income reported (12 M VND/month) is relatively important.

71. Mrs. Nguyễn Thị Bé Hai was affected by loss of residential land without structure. Following land acquisition, she rented a house belonging to some relatives and is now operating a business (small retails shops) near a market in Cao Lanh City. She complained about the low compensation rates but her income was not affected. Her current location, close to a market generate good business opportunities.

72. Regarding Mr. Phạm Văn Minh, he retired and moved to Ho Chi Minh City. He kept a land and a small house in An Binh his home town. These land and house were affected by the bypass projects. However at this time he already moved to HCMC where he is living with relatives. Due to low compensation rates he reported to have difficulties to keep the same living standards. However his income was not affected; he is still receiving pension from the government.

7.5.3 Reestablishment of Livelihood

73. Table 7-6 presents the change in income and in living standards as reported by HH and as evaluated by the DDIS team.

74. It was assessed that for 2 HH, livelihoods are not totally restored. To assist these HH to restore their income, some recommendations are proposed (i.e. participation in the income restoration program). These recommendations are presented in section 7.6.

75. We should note that according to detailed design, in all the loops, the main irrigation channel will be maintained by building box culverts. However due to the presence of soft soils, culverts could be installed only in 15 to 18 months from now, once soil settlement has occurred.

76. In the transition period, temporary pipes have been installed but according to farmers, water flow is not sufficient, especially for farmers at the end of the irrigation network. Additional surveys conducted in October 2015 showed that the contractor dug an open ditch to supply sufficient water for agriculture production. Conditions of cultivation of annual crop (mainly paddy) are near normal in the loops. Most of the land is currently cultivated along the main irrigation canal.

77. Fruit trees, especially mango trees, also need regular irrigation. Lack of water will affect the fruit size and therefore the income from mango trees.



Page 18 of 21

Table 7-5: Changes in Household Income as Reported by the HHs

Source of

income

Income Million

VND/month

Vulnerable

HH

Change in living

standards according to

AHs

Assessment by DDIS team

Before LA After LA

1 Thái Văn Anh

Brew wine and raise pig

10

10

No No change

No impact; HH still stay along NH30;

2 Nguyễn Thành Được Hired labour 7,5 7,5 No No change; Income not affected

3

Nguyễn Thị Bé Hai

Small business

3

3

No

Worse due to low compensation; renting house and operate small business

Lost residential land without structures; her income was not affected; she has a small business (selling beverages) close to a market with good business opportunities;

4

Đoàn Hữu Hiếu

Wage from government and farming

5

4

No Worse; agriculture land

uncultivated, due to irrigation ditch blocked;

HH lost only 223 m2 of productive land; His land is currently cultivated (paddy) in the loop of the interchange; he also receives salary from the government;

5 Đoàn Thị Ánh Hồng

Government staff 7 7

No No change

Income not affected

6

Phạm Phi Hùng

Brick kiln

100

10

No

Much lower income due to reduction of productive assets;

Income reduced significantly but still have income from business and changed cash compensation received in gold; not in difficult situation;

7 Nguyễn Văn Kiều Farming 4 4 No

No change Income not affected; loss only 26 m2 of productive land

8

Nguyễn Thị Lệ

Retired/pension

5

4

No

Business now not directly along the road with less customers;

Income affected due to less business opportunities; need assistance.

9 Thái Văn Liêm NA NA NA NA NA

10

Phạm Văn Minh

Retired wage

3

3

No Worse due to low compensation

He retired and moved to HCMC before land acquisition; he kept a land and house in An Binh


Page 19 of 21

Source of

income

Income Million

VND/month

Vulnerable

HH

Change in living

standards according to

AHs

Assessment by DDIS team

Before LA After LA

his home town. He is living with relatives and is receiving pension form government; not in difficult situation

11 Nguyễn Văn Nhạn Farming 8 8 No No change Lost residential land; income not affected

12 Huỳnh Thị Phi Hired labour 3 3 No

No change Income not affected; relocate but could buy a land and built a new house.

13 Nguyễn Văn Bé Tám NA NA NA NA NA

14 Đoàn Văn Tùng Farming 10 10 No no change Productive land not affected

15 Đoàn Hữu Thảo Government staff/farming 5 5

No

no change

Lost 17.6% of his productive land; his remaining agriculture land is irrigated and cultivated, including his land in the loop. Not involved in IRP; as the HH lost more than 10% of his productive land, he should be involved in the IRP.

16

Trịnh Văn Theo

Farming

5

5

No

Worse; agriculture land uncultivated , due to blockage of irrigation ditch

Lost 57.2% of his agriculture land; remaining agriculture land irrigated; He has 110 m2 within the loop not cultivated but irrigated; already involved in the IRP which;

17

Dương Thành Thi

Hired labour/ farming 6 6

No

Worse; agriculture land uncultivated , due to blockage of irrigation ditch

Lost 13.9% of his agriculture land. She has 437 m2 within the loop not cultivated but irrigated; already involved in the IRP;

18 Nguyễn Thị Bích Thủy Hired labour/ driver 10 10

No

No change

Income not affected

19 Nguyễn Phương Trinh Wage 3 7,5 No Better Better situation

20 Nguyễn Thanh Vũ Business 12 12 No Worse due to low rate

for compensation Income not affected; Relatively high income;


Page 20 of 21

7.6 Conclusion and Recommendations

78. Compensation for land. The compensation rates paid for land were based on the Dong

Thap PPC unit rates (decisions No. 28/2009/QD-UBND and No.08/2008/QD-UBND). It was

assessed that compensation rates were lower than market rates as established by the

independent valuer in 2012 when he conducted RCS for the CMDCP. However at the time of

compensation, these HH were not affected by the CMDCP, the design was changed later. At the

time of the change of design, HH had already been compensated and handed over the land.

Therefore they have never been considered as affected under the CMDCP. The 10 HH, already

compensated, were located within the RoW of the CMDCP when the detailed design was

approved and have been considered as AHs under the CMDCP. The 20 HH recently complained

to the CHLFD and their complaints were channeled to the Cao Lanh District for review and

decision in October 2015. The 20 HH have the right to complain and Cao Lanh district will review

their cases and will decide if additional compensation is necessary or not. Low compensation rate

is also not the main reason for loss of income and negative change for livelihood. It is also due to

the decision of some HH to stop to cultivate land even if the land is irrigated for 2 HH or location

of small business for 2 HH. Households have also received various assistance (i.e. life stabilization

allowance, allowance for occupational change) to support them during the transition period. No

action required

79. Irrigation ditches blocked: 3 HH, Mr. Doan Huu Hieu, Mr. Trịnh Văn Theo and Mrs. Dương

Thành Thi have land inside the loops. They indicated that their land inside the loops are currently

not irrigated. However, additional surveys conducted in October showed that their land is

normally irrigated following new ditch dug by contractor. Several farmers cultivate annual crops

normally within the loops (including Mr. Doan Huu Hieu).t. Permanent culverts will be installed

in 15 months. No action is required as Mr. Doan Huu Hieu lost only 233 m2 of land and his land

inside the loop is currently cultivated. Regarding Mr. Trịnh Văn Theo and Mrs. Dương Thành Thi,

their lands are normally irrigated following works conducted by the contractor but not cultivated.

They are also already involved in the IRP. No Action required.

80. Income Restoration Program (IRP) for agriculture; 3 HH lost more than 10% of their

agriculture land, Đoàn Hữu Thảo, Trịnh Văn Theo and Dương Thành Thi. They reported lack of

irrigation and impacts on their agriculture production. However their land within the loop is

currently irrigated and the land of Mr. Đoàn Hữu Thảo is cultivated. MM. Trịnh Văn Theo and

Dương Thành Thi are already involved in the IRP under the CMDCP. For equity, because he lost

more than 10% of his productive land, Mr. Đoàn Hữu Thảo should also be involved in the IRP.

Action required. Đoàn Hữu Thảo should be eligible to the IRP for next stage (after mid-term

evaluation).

81. Income Restoration Program (IRP) for small business. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Le meets

difficulties with her small business and experienced loss of income and decrease in living

standards. Action required. Mrs. Nguyen Thi Le should be eligible to the IRP for small business

for next stage (after mid-term evaluation) to benefit from training on business management and

provision of equipment.

7.7 Budget for Corrective Actions

82. The budget to cover proposed corrective actions is presented in Table 7.6. Costs of

rehabilitation of irrigation ditches was under contractor’s budget. Other costs are related to

inclusion of HH in the IRP for the next stage (after mid-term evaluation report). Costs estimates

is 19.5 M VND equivalent to 900 USD).



Page 21 of 21

Table 7-6: Budget for Corrective Actions (Million VND)

HH name Support amount

under IRP

Allowances during training

(transport meal etc.) as per IRP6

Total

Đoàn Hữu Thảo 8 M 2 M 10

Nguyen Thi Le 8 M 1,5 M 9.5

TOTAL 16 M 4 M 19.5 M

6 Average amounts were taken; training course for agriculture are longer than for small business

CMDCP Annex 1: Summary of Additional Compensation Plans

Page 1 of 22

Annex 1: Summary of Adjustment between Former and Additional Compensation

Plans

1. A Additional adjustment for house and secondary structure

No Name Value of Compensation

in decision No 15/2010

Value of compensation according

updated replacement cost

(Decision No 16)

Value of change

1 2 3 4 5=4-3

1 Nguyen Thi Ba 152,943,026 175,590,336 22,647,310

2 Đang thi Ngoc Bich 17,620,565 18,948,231 1,327,666

3 Nguyen Van Dung 84,500,532 94,808,752 10,308,220

4 Đang Kim Hung 59,102,500 67,558,546 8,456,046

5 Doan Van Lo 60,125,190 72,043,227 11,918,037

6 Nguyen Thanh Qui 353,896,744 391,481,314 37,584,571

7 Đang Van Toi 32,395,125 35,818,061 3,422,934

Total 760,583,682 856,248,467 95,664,784

1.B Additional adjustment for Trees

No Name

Value of compensation approved

in Decision No 08

Value of compensation

adjusted in Decision No 17 Value of change

Planted Trees Bonsai Planted Trees Bonsai

1 2 3 4 5 6 7=(5+6)-(3+4)

1 Nguyen thi Ba 2,723,000 295,000 3,383,000 160,000 525,000

2 Nguyen Van Dung 0 30,000 0 15,000 -15,000

3 Đang Kim Hưng 182,000 10,000 143,000 10,000 -39,000

4 Đoan Van Lo 244,000 117,000 334,000 17,000 -10,000

5 Đang Van Toi 256,000 31,000 323,000 3,000 39,000

Total 500,000

1.C Additional adjustment for Allowances

No Name

Value of

compensation plan

approved

Value of

compensation plan

adjusted

Change

of Value

1 2 3 4 5=4-3

1 Nguyen Thi Ba 12,960,000 17,280,000 4,320,000

2 Đang Thi Ngoc Bich 12,960,000 17,280,000 4,320,000

3 Nguyen Van Dung 29,160,000 38,880,000 9,720,000

4 Đang Kim Hung 12,960,000 17,280,000 4,320,000

5 Đoàn Van Lo 3,240,000 4,320,000 1,080,000

6 Nguyen Thanh Qui 6,480,000 8,640,000 2,160,000

7 Đang Van Toi 25,920,000 34,560,000 8,640,000

Total 103,680,000 138,240,000 34,560,000


Page 2 of 17

1.D: Additional Compensation for Land

No Name Purpose in land

use

Area

( m2)

Location of land

acquisition

Compensation plan

approved Compensation plan adjusted

Value of change

( đ)

Unit (Đ) Anount (đ) Unit (Đ) Anount (đ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 Nguyen Thi Ba 240,444,000 1,159,922,000 919,478,000

RESIDENTIAL 142.1 KV2-VT1 1,200,000 170,520,000 5,860,000 832,706,000 662,186,000

55.9 KV2-VT2 600,000 33,540,000 2,930,000 163,787,000 130,247,000

GARDEN 87.4 KV1-VT1 60,000 5,244,000 130,000 11,362,000 6,118,000

SUPPORT50% 16.4 KV2-VT1 600,000 9,840,000 2,930,000 48,052,000 38,212,000

71.0 KV2-VT2 300,000 21,300,000 1,465,000 104,015,000 82,715,000

2 Nguyen Van Dung 193,722,000 945,080,000 751,358,000


45.4 KV2-VT2 600,000 27,240,000 2,930,000 133,022,000 105,782,000

GARDEN 5.7 KV1-VT1 60.000 342,000 130,000 741,000 399,000

SUPPORT 50% 5.7 KV2-VT1 600,000 3,420,000 2,930,000 16,701,000 13,281,000

3 Đang Kim Hung 41,856,000 196,116,400 154,260,000

RESIDENTIAL 33,6 KV2-VT2 600,000 20,160,000 2,930,000 98,448,000 78,288,000

26,4 KV2-VT3 360,000 9,504,000 1,758,000 46,411,200 36,907,200

GARDEN 50,8 KV1-VT1 60,000 3,048,000 130,000 6,604,000 3,556,000

SUPPORT 50% 50,8 KV2-VT3 180,000 9,144,000 879,000 44,653,200 35,509,200

4 Bui Thanh Liem 56,760,000 277,178,000 220,418,000

RESIDENTIAL 47,3 KV2-VT1 1,200,000 56,760,000 5,860,000 277,178,000 220,418,000

5 Đang Kim Loan 100,422,000 489,302,000 388,880,000


GARDEN 6.7 KV1-VT1 60,000 402,000 130,000 871,000 469,000

SUPPORT 50% 6.7 KV2-VT1 600,000 4,020,000 2,930,000 19,631,000 15,611,000

6 Đoan Van Lo 97,920,000 478,176,000 380,256,000


7 Nguyen Thanh Qui 234,600,000 1,145,630,000 911,030,000


Page 3 of 17

No Name Purpose in land

use

Area

( m2)

Location of land

acquisition

Compensation plan

approved Compensation plan adjusted

Value of change

( đ)

Unit (Đ) Anount (đ) Unit (Đ) Anount (đ)

RESIDENTIAL 192.8 KV2-VT1 1,200,000 231,360,000 5,860,000 1,129,808,000 898,448,000

5.4 KV2-VT2 600,000 3,240,000 2,930,000 15,822,000 12,582,000

8 Đang Van Toi 40,296,000 189,851,300 149,555,300

RESIDENTIAL 35.4 KV2-VT2 600,000 21,240,000 2,930,000 103,722,000 82,482,000

24.6 KV2-VT3 360,000 8,856,000 1,758,000 43,246,800 34,390,800

GARDEN 42.5 KV1-VT1 60,000 2,550,000 130,000 5,525,000 2,975,000

SUPPORT 50% 42.5 KV2-VT3 180,000 7,650,000 879,000 37.357,500 29,707,500

9 Bui Nguyen Hieu Trung 48,360,000 236,158,000 187,798,000


TOTAL 4,063,033,700

CMDCP Annex 2: Photos of Affected Houses

Page 4 of 24

Annex 2: Photos of Affected Houses

House of Mr Nguyen Thanh Quy and Nguyen Van Dung (on the right)

House built with temporary materials Doan Van Lo’s house

CMDCP Annex 2: Photos of Affected Houses

Page 5 of 24

House built with temporary materials Dang Kim Toi’s house

CMDCP Annex 3: Photos of Affected Land

Page 6 of 24

Annex 3: Photos of Affected Land

Irrigation ditch blocked by CMDCP project;

temporary pipes are installed

Location of Remaining Land in An Binh

interchange is uncultivated ( red colour)

Land part in IC of HHs: Nguyen Trung Chanh, ; Mai Thi

Lap are uncultivated

Land Part in IC of HHs; Duong Thanh Thi and Trinh Van

Theo are uncultivated

CMDCP Annex 3: Photos of Affected Land

Page 7 of 24

Irrigation Ditch blocked by project

construction; temporary pipes are installed;

Current. Land part in IC of HH: Doan Huu Thao

is cultivated (rice).

CMDCP Annex 4: Letter of Approval of Replacement Costs Survey

Page 8 of 24

Annex 4: Letter of Approval of the Replacement Costs Survey

Related to compensation price applied for residential land in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district,

Dong Thap province:

- The Valuation Certificate No.Vc14/10/455A/TS-VL dated on 17 October, 2014 issued by

Southwest Information and Appraisal Corporation;

- On 28 October, 2014, The Task Team (established at the Decision No.85/QD-UBND-TL dated on

25 July, 2014 issued by People’s Committee of Dong Thap province to solve difficulties in

compensation - support - resettlement task for the Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity

Project) submitted the Report No.02/BC-DCT to PPC to approve residential land price applied in

An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district, Dong Thap province (Residential land price for location 1:

5,860,000 VND/m2).

- On 27 November, 2014, PPC issued the document No.371/TB-VPUBND, in article 8 stated that

“Agreed policy for resolving difficulties in compensation implementation proposed by

Department of Natural Resources and Environment at document No.02/BC-DCT dated on 28

October, 2014 (the Task Team established at the Decision No.85/QD-UBND-TL dated on 25 July,

2014 issued by People’s Committee of Dong Thap province”.

- On 13 February, 2015, PPC issued the document No.60/TB-VPUBND. It was stated that “Center

for Development of House Land Fund implements: ……… The intersection area with NH30

bypass road project, checks, submits the procedure, prepares the compensation plan for unpaid

households belong to NH30 bypass road project, applies new compensation rate and policy of

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity, send to DONRE for review and submit PPC for

approval, using the fund of Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity to do payment for HH”.


Page 9 of 24

PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE

OF DONG THAP PROVINCE

TASK TEAM ESTABLISHED AT THE DECISION NO.85/QD-

UBND-TL DATED ON 25 JULY, 2014 ISSUED BY PEOPLE’S

COMMITTEE OF DONG THAP PROVINCE

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM

Independence - Freedom - Happiness

No:02/BC-DCT Dong Thap, dated on 28 October, 2014

REPORT

On getting opinion to solve difficulties in compensation, support and resettlement for

HHs affected by Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge Construction in An Binh

commune, Cao Lanh district

Pursuant to Decision No.85/QD-UBND-TL dated on 27 July, 2014 issued by

Provincial People’s Committee on establishing the Task Team to audit, verify complains

by HHs related to compensation, support and resettlement for Component 1 Project - Cao

Lanh Bridge Construction, Component 2 Project - The Interconnecting Road Construction

between Cao Lanh Bridge and Vam Cong Bridge belong to Central MeKong Delta Region

Connectivity Project in Dong Thap province (hereinafter referred to as the Task Team).

After discussing with Le Minh Chi HH at the minute No.06/BB-DCT dated on 22

August, 2014 and Dinh Thi Ngoc Tuyen HH (is authorized by Mr.Vu Van Binh, Mr.Vu Van

Sach, Ms.Vu Thi Thom, Mr.Vu Van Phung and Ms.Le Thi Thu Chi) at the minute No.07/BB-

DCT dated on 22 August, 2014. The Task Team had a meeting to unify a proposal in order

to submit PPC to getting opinion for implementation (described at minute No.10/BB-DCT

dated on 09 October, 2014), as follows:

1. Compensation price for land:

Pursuant to The Valuation Certificate No.Vc14/10/455A/TS-VL dated on 17 October, 2014

issued by Southwest Information and Appraisal Corporation and document No.28CV.2014

dated on 17 October, 2014 issued by Southwest Information and Appraisal Corporation

on feedback consultancy result of price for Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge

Construction in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district.

Whereby, Southwest Information and Appraisal Corporation (the consultancy

agency for compensation land price) proposed the compensation price for

implementation Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge Construction in An Binh

commune, Cao Lanh district at location 1: 5,860,000 VND/m2 (the remaining locations are

calculated as regulations on land price of People’s Committee of Dong Thap province at

the time when the compensation plan for Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge

Construction in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district is approved).

The Task Team realized that this is a legal basic to adjust compensation price for

land. In order to resolve difficulties for implementation Component 1 Project - Cao lanh

Bridge Construction in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district, the Task Team proposes PPC

to approve compensation price for land in An Binh commune to at location 1: 5,860,000

VND/m2 (the remaining locations are calculated as regulations on land price of People’s

Committee of Dong Thap province at the time when the compensation plan for


Page 10 of 24

Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge Construction in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh

district is approved).

Besides, some HHs had acquired land for Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge

Construction where is quite convenience for doing business (near the existing asphalted

road and river, larger font). Thus, the Task Team proposes PPC to review and approve one

of two following options:

- Option 1:

Besides compensation price is applied for residential land at location 1 proposed

by the consultant agency (the remaining locations are calculated as regulations stated at

Decision No.35/2011/QD-UBND dated on 27 December, 2012), it is aslo applied other

support policy by 10% of compensation price for residential land depending on locations

(ratio is calculated for each location complies regulations of land price issued by People’s

Committee of Dong Thap Province at the time when the compensation plan for


district is approved).

- Option 2:

Compensating for land as the plot has 2 fronts: location 1 is defined from the

asphalted road and river for each location according to regulations of land price issued by

People’s Committee of Dong Thap Province at the time when the compensation plan for


district is approved.

After reviewing 2 above options, Department of Natural Resources proposes

Provincial People’s Committee accept the option 2 because it is better than for HHs.

2. Compensation price for Vu Thi Thom’s house

After reviewing the proposal prepared by Center for Development of House Land

Fund and comments of Department of Construction, the Task Team agrees to propose

PPC accept this proposal due to it is based on comments of Department of Construction

for calculating compensation price for Vu Thi Thom’s house: compensation price is

average of prices promulgated at Item a and Item c, Clause 1, Article 7: Storehouse,

factory of Decision No.16/2012/QD-UBND.

Detail: (1,038,240 VND/m2 + 1,545,600 VND/m2)/2 = 1,291,920 VND/m2

3. Support for stopping business

It is considered that Huong Thao Gas Station Enterprise (Dinh Thi Ngoc Tuyen HH)

is a special case in whole project and has to stop gas business (due to they cannot find

the suitable place to continue business) when handing-over land for the project (labour

contracts of Huong Thao Gas Station Enterprise are compensated for employees because

they have to stop their job at Article 11 - Decision No.29/2009/QD-UBND). Therefore, the

Task Team agrees to propose PPC apply the transition and creation job policy as Article

22 - Decree No.69/2009/ND-CP, support amount is based on cost for job training to

members in their family).

4. Non-term interest rate support

It is considered that the compensation, support and resettlement plan for


district was approved in 2012 but so far they have not received compensation, support

payment. In order to reduce disadvantages for HHs, the Task Team proposes PPC accept


Page 11 of 24

to apply non-term interest rate support for these HHs by calculating interest and capital,

calculating time is defined from date of the payment announcement of the state

management agency (according to the minute No.07/NN-DCT dated on 22 August, 2014).

After having PPC’s approval, assign:

- People’s Committee of Cao Lanh district completes legal documents and check all

relevant documents to prepare enforcement implementation in case that HHs do not

agree to hand-over land for the project when PPC approves the above proposal.

- Center for Development of House Land Fund:

+ Responsible for volume, area which has defined and calculated for HHs as PPC

regulations and the proposal of the Task Team, prepares the compensation plan to send

DONRE in order to submit PC of Dong Thap province for approval.

+ Coordinate with PC of Cao Lanh district to complete relevant legal documents.

- Department of Natural Resources and Environment: After receiving the

compensation plan prepared by CDHLF, DONRE will appraise and submit PPC for approval.

Propose PPC for consideration and approval.

Recipients:

- Provincial People’s Committee;

- The Task Team;

- Departments: Finance, Construction, Justice;

- Filed at: VT, CCQLDD.Pthuy.(20)

ON BEHALF OF THE TASK TEAM

TEAM LEADER

(Signed)

DIRECTOR OF DONRE

Nguyen Trung Ngay


Page 12 of 24



OFFICE DIVISION



No:371/TB-VPUBND Dong Thap, dated on 27 November, 2014

ANNOUNCEMENT

Conclusion of Mr.Nguyen Van Duong - Chairman of Provincial People’s Committee at

the meeting of Chairman and Vice-Chairmans dated on 19 November, 2015

On 19 November, 2014, at the office of PPC, Mr.Nguyen Van Duong - Chairman of

PPC chaired the meeting with Vice-Chairmans. Attending the meeting were

representatives of: Provincial Fatherland Front Committee; Department of Foreign

Affairs; Department of Home Affairs, Department of Justice; Department of Planning and

Investment; Department of Transport; Department of Finance; Department of Labour,

War Invalids and Social Affairs; Department of Agriculture and Rural Development;

Department of Natural Resources and Environment; Department of Information and

Communications; Center for Development of House Land Fund; Cooperative Unions;

Provincial Inspectorate, Board of Economic Zone Management; People’s Committee of

Cao Lanh district; People’s Committee of Hong Ngu district.

After hearing contents presented by departments, comments by delegates,

Mr.Nguyen Van Duong - Chairman of PPC concluded as follows:

…

8. Policy for resolving difficulties about compensation, support and resettlement

for affected households by Component 1 Project - Cao Lanh Bridge Construction in An

Binh commune

Agreed policy for resolving difficulties in compensation implementation proposed

by Department of Natural Resources and Environment at document No.02/BC-DCT dated

on 28 October, 2014 (the Task Team established at the Decision No.85/QD-UBND-TL

dated on 25 July, 2014 issued by People’s Committee of Dong Thap province.

The PPC office announced the above conclusion to relevant agencies to grasp and

implement.

Recipients:

- TT/TU,TT/Provincial People’s Council;

- Chairman, Vice-Chairmans/PPC;

- Participants;

- LDVP/PPC;

- CVNC/PPC;

- Filed VT, TH.ntv.

CHIEF OF OFFICE

(Signed)

Nguyen Van Hai


Page 13 of 24



OFFICE DIVISION



No:60/TB-VPUBND Dong Thap, dated on 13 February, 2015

ANNOUNCEMENT

Conclusion of Mr.Nguyen Thanh Hung - Vice-Chairman of Provincial People’s

Committee at the meeting on clearance site for Cao Lanh and Vam Cong bridges

Construction Project and the interconnecting road between Cao Lanh bridge and Vam

Cong bridge

On 13 February, 2015, at the office of PPC, Mr.Nguyen Thanh Hung - Vice-Chairman

of PPC chaired the meeting with leaders of departments: Department of Transport,

Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Center for Development of House

Land Fund, People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, CuuLong CIPM.

After hearing leader of CuuLong CIPM reported some obstructions in

compensation and clearance site of the project, comments of participants, Mr.Nguyen

Thanh Hung - Vice-Chairman of Dong Thap People’s Committee concluded as follows:

1.Center for Development of House Land Fund implements:

….

The intersection area with NH30 bypass road project, checks, submits the

procedure, prepares the compensation plan for unpaid households belong to NH30

bypass road project, applies new compensation rate and policy of Central Mekong Delta

Region Connectivity, send to DONRE for review and submit PPC for approval, using the

fund of Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity to do payment for HH.

…..

The PPC office announced the above conclusion to relevant agencies to grasp and

implement.

Recipients:

- Participants;

- Chairman, Vice-Chairmans/PPC;

- Participants;

- LDVP;

- CVNC/PPC;

- Filed: VT, NC/KTN (V).

ON BEHALF OF CHIEF OF OFFICE

DEPUTY CHIEF OF OFFICE

(Signed)

Nguyen Van Phu

CMDCP Annex 5: Valuation Certificate

Page 14 of 24

Annex 5: Valuation Certificate

APPRAISAL COMMITTEE OF VIET NAM

SOUTHWEST INFORMATION AND APPRAISAL CORPORATION

Vinh Long Brach - Representative office in Dong Thap

Address: 300 Nguyen Thi Minh Khai Street, Ward 1, Cao Lanh City, Dong Thap Province

Telephone: 0673 877 588 - 0703 843 043 - Mobibe: 0939 157 979

VALUATION CERTIFICATE No: Vc 14/10/455A/TS-VL Cao Lanh City, dated on 17 October, 2014

Issued to Client:

CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSE LAND FUND


Address: 05-07 Hai Ba Trung Street, Ward 2, Cao Lanh City, Dong Thap Province

Valuation purpose: Set up a basis to determine the replacement cost of compensation, support and

resettlement

I. Valuation results

- Details prescribed in enclosed Appendixes

II. Conditions together with valuation results:

The valuation results above only have effects in October 2014 for 1 m2 land using right, construction

structures and planting trees at An Binh commune, Cao Lanh district, Dong Thap province which has legal

characters, locations and actual status described details in the enclosed Appendixes to set up a basic to

determine the replacement cost of compensation, support and resettlement according to the demand of

Center for Development of House Land Fund of Dong Thap province at valuation time and location.

- The price of land use right given by SIAC - Representative office in Dong Thap province does not include

the compensation cost, support and resettlement, job creation, job training… (at Document No.2232/TTg-

KTN dated on December 05, 2011 issued by Prime Minister about approving the policy frame of

compensation, support and resettlement - Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project).

- Property transaction prices may actually be higher or lower than the market value depends on the

subjectivity of the property owner, the needs of potential buyers, trading conditions and market dynamics

when dealing.

- The details of Valuation Certificate: see the enclosed Appendix No. Vc 14/10/455A/TS-VL.

- Restrictions of Valuation Certificate are presented in overleaf.

- Valuation Certificate is made 4 originals: client keeps 3 and SIAC - Representative office in Dong Thap

province keeps 1.

This Valuation Certificate is not valid certificate of ownership of assets.

Valuer Brach Director

Võ Bửu Viết Cường Nguyễn Phạm Huy Hoàng


Page 15 of 24

Valuer Card No: IV06167 Valuer Card No: 06072Đ1

Restrictions of the Valuation Certificate

The following restrictions apply to the Valuation Certificate:

1. Results of the valuation certificate is only used for the purpose of specific evaluation following

the customer’s request, which have been presented in the first part of the first page of this

valuation certification

Customer will be completely responsible when using improperly this valuation certificate

2. Validity period of the valuation certificate is calculated from the date of the issuance of the

Valuation certificate:

- 03 ( three ) months for assets of individual property;

- 06 ( six ) months for assets is property of enterprise;

(After the periods indicated above, value assets can change following market evolution)

3. Only the originals and copies valuation certificates issued by SIAC are truly valuable

All acts used copies of valuation certificate without confirmation by SIAC will be considered as

breach of law with no legal value

4. Customer requires valuation and valuation appraiser guide to valuate the current state of the

property must be entirely responsible for information related to technical-economic

characteristics, features and legality valuation of assets provided to SIAC at the time and place of

valuation

SIAC is not responsible for checking the information of copies of documents relating to the legality of

the property valuation requirements in comparison with the original


Page 16 of 24


Page 17 of 24

Pursuant to survey result:

K = (5,647,059 + 8,585.859 + 5,870,290 + 3,344,482)/4 = 5,861,923

In order to reduce disadvantages, ensure benefits to affected households after land acquisition

as well as to implement compensation task to be favorable, SIAC - Preventative Office in Dong

Thap proposes the final replacement cost for rural residential land at the front of Highway No.30

(Can Lo bridge - An Binh bridge) as below:

Location 1 (VT1) = 5.860,000 VND/m2

The remaining locations are applied ratio of percentage as prescribed at Decision

No.35/2011/QD-UBND dated on 27 December, 2011 by Dong Thap People’s Committee,

detailded:

Location 2 (VT2) = 50%*VT1 = 50%*5,860,000 = 2,930,000 VND/m2

Location 2 (VT3) = 30%*VT1 = 30%*5,860,000 = 1,758,000 VND/m2


Page 18 of 24

Appendix 04

Rates for House and substructure

As in Decision No 16/2012/QĐ-UBND dated 12/6/2012 by Dong Thap PC

I. Price for House

Unit: VND/m2

Type Unit

Max Min

1/- UNITED HOUSE (VND/m2)

House with a storey 1 storey 2,468,480 1,977,920

House with 2 stories 2 storeys 3,030,720 2,775,360

House with 3 to 5 stories 3-5 storeys 3.139.360 2,896,320

* These houses will add or except following

concreted used materials

2/- SEPARATE HOUSE (VND/m2)

House with a storey 1 storey 2,901,920 2,275,840

House with 2 storeys 2 storeys 4,353,440 3,054,240

House with 3 to 5 storeys 3-5 storeys 3.430,560 3,181,920



3/- VILLA

House 1 storey to 3 storeys 5,025,440 4,495,680



4/- TEMPORARY HOUSE ( C.4 )

Completed House

a-Floor: earth; wall: that; frame:

bamboo, wood 301,280 218,400

b-Floor: cement; wall: wood with low

quality; frame: wood with low quality 565,600 481,600

c-Floor: refined brick; wood frame;

wall: wood with 3 classify 1,422,400 1,163,680

d-Floor: patterned brick; wood frame

with 3 classify; wall: zinc iron 1,264,480 1,015,840

đ -House as d classify but floor built by

brick Add 71,680 đ from d classify

e- if have concreted pillar

Will be calculated as wood

frame with 3 classify

g- if house have brick pillar Will be calculated as a, b

5/- SEPARATE TOILET

Solid toilet 4,445,280

Will add or except following concreted used

materials

Temporary toilet 1,635,200

6/- STORE HOUSE, WORKSHOP

House with 1 foundation: reinforced concrete;

floor: reinforced concrete, steel beam, roof:

corrugated iron

Category No 1 , high ; 6m , no crane 1,596,000 1,038,240

Category 2 : house with 1 story, high

=< 9m , no crane 3,270,400 1,910,720

CMDCP Annex 3: Results of Replacement Costs Survey

Page 19 of 24

II. STRUCTURE

Type unit Max Min Earth cement refined brick patterned

brick Hollow brick

Bamboo;

Wood with

low quality

Wood in

3 group;

stone

pillar

Wood

with low

quality;

stone

pillar

Floor m2 285,600 8,960 8,960 72,800 73,930 169,120 52,640 88,480 471,520 285,600

Bamboo,

cajuput,

eucalyptus

Wood with low

quality (saw

square)

Wood in III

group

Frame, Pillar m2 366,240 39,200 39,200 144,480 366,240

Thatch with

beam:

Bamboo,

cajuput,

eucalyptus

Thatch with

beam: wood in III

group

Corrugated

iron with

beam: wood

in III group

Corrugated

iron with

beam:

Bamboo,

cajuput,

eucalyptus

Fibrocement

with beam:

wood in III

group

Fibrocement

with beam:

Bamboo,

cajuput,

eucalyptus

Tile with

beam:

wood in III

group

Roof m2 405,440 53,760 53,760 147,840 216,160 121,296 231,840 131,712 405,440

Thatch

Wood with low

quality

Corrugated

iron

Wood in III

group

Wattle m2 191,520 39,200 39,200 71,680 106,400 191,520

Built: hollow

brick with

thickness of

100 , no

plastered by

cement and

sand

Built: hollow brick

with thickness of

100 , plastered

by cement and

sand in 1 side,

Built: hollow

brick with

thickness of

100 ,

plastered by

cement and

sand in 2

side

Built: hollow

brick with

thickness of

200 , no

plastered by

cement and

sand

Built: hollow

brick with

thickness of

200 ,

plastered by

cement and

sand in 1 side,

Built: hollow

brick with

thickness of

200 ,

plastered by

cement and

sand in 2 side

Built:

thickness

brick,

plastered

by

cement

and sand

in 1 side

Wall m2 1,109,920 70,560 70,560 105,280 140,000 132,160 169,120 206,080 1,109,920

Plastered on 1

side

Plastered on 2

sides

Plaster- work m2 66,000 33,000 33,000 66,000

CMDCP Annex 3: Results of Replacement Costs Survey

Page 20 of 24

Type unit Max Min Earth cement refined brick patterned

brick Hollow brick

Bamboo;

Wood with

low quality

Wood in

3 group;

stone

pillar

Wood

with low

quality;

stone

pillar

Fence by steel,

foundation+

pillar, concrete

cement

Net B 40 with

foundation, pillar,

concrete cement ,

Net B40,

stone pillar

Net B 40,

Concrete

cement pillar

Fence m2 1,085,280 80,640 1,085,280 966,800 80,640 106,400

Wall pressed

by ceramic

Yard built

concrete cement

with thickness of 5

cm

Yard built

cement

under is

rubble

Yard built tau

brick 30x30

Yard with

patterned

brick,

foundation is

not concrete

cement

Yard with

ceramic,

foundation is

not

concreted

cement

Wall pressed

by decorative

brick, yard by

brick

200,480 58,240 200,480 66,080 58,240 61,600 101,920 135,520

Concrete with

stone layer 4x6

Foundation for Machine with: House foundation Concrete

Pillar, stone

1x2

Concrete

Beam

with

stone 1x2

Concrete

Floor and

roof with

stone 1x2

Concrete with

steel , stone 1x2

Concrete no

steel,

stone1x2

Concrete with

steel , stone

1x2

Concrete no

steel,

stone1x2

Concrete m3 4,841,760 833,280 833,280 2,124,640 1,617,280 1,831,200 1,321,600 4,708,480 4,841,760 3,982,720

CMDCP Annex 5: Access Road to Ward 6 Relocation Site

Page 21 of 24

Appendix 05

Rates for planted Trees and Livestock and Relocation for grave

As in Decision No 16/2012/QĐ-UBND dated 12/6/2012 by Dong Thap PC

I. PLANTED TREEs

No Tree, group tree Unit Compensation Rates (Category) Density

(tree/1,000 m2) A B C D

A FRUIT TREE

I Hard tree

1 Mango VND/tree 1,600,000 970,000 400,000 50,000 63

2 Mangosteen VND/tree 1,000,000 600,000 300,000 50,000 20

3 Durian VND/tree 1,000,000 600,000 300,000 50,000 16

4 Sapote VND/tree 570,000 470,000 240,000 40,000 63

5 Tangerine VND/tree 640,000 530,000 260,000 40,000 160

6 Coconut VND/tree 560,000 340,000 170,000 40,000 28

7 Orange VND/tree 490,000 290,000 140,000 30,000 250

8 Pomelo VND/tree 490,000 290,000 140,000 30,000 63

9 Rambutan VND/tree 490,000 290,000 140,000 30,000 63

10 Longan VND/tree 490,000 290,000 140,000 30,000 63

11 Langsat VND/tree 490,000 290,000 140,000 30,000 63

12 Jackfruit VND/tree 420,000 250,000 140,000 30,000 63

13 Mulberry VND/tree 420,000 250,000 140,000 30,000 63

14 Tamarind VND/tree 420,000 250,000 140,000 20,000 49

15 Star apple VND/tree 420,000 250,000 140,000 20,000 63

16 Custard-apple VND/tree 420,000 250,000 140,000 20,000 250

17 Cóc VND/tree 300,000 200,000 100,000 30,000 40

18 Lemon VND/tree 300,000 200,000 110,000 30,000 160

19 Apple VND/tree 300,000 200,000 110,000 30,000 111

20 Cherry VND/tree 300,000 200,000 110,000 30,000 111

21 Thistle VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 111

22 Chùm ruột VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 160

23 Plum VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 111

24 Peach VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 63

25 Cashew VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 63

26 Pomegranate,

decandrous persimmon,

persimmon VND/tree

220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 250

27 Guava VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 20,000 200

28 Lucuma mamosa VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 25,000 63

29 Licorice VND/tree 220,000 140,000 100,000 20,000 40


Page 22 of 24

No Tree, group tree Unit Compensation Rates (Category) Density

(tree/1,000 m2) A B C D

30 Coffee VND/tree 250,000 160,000 100,000 20,000 250

31 Pepper VND/tree 280,000 180,000 110,000 20,000 250

32 Betel VND/tree 140,000 100,000 70,000 20,000 1000

33 Areca VND/tree 140,000 100,000 70,000 20,000 250

II Creeper tree

34 Calabash, squash, gac

fruit, loofah, chayote VND/trellis 300,000 180,000 80,000

35 Dragon fruit VND/trellis 200,000 120,000 25,000 250

36 Papaya VND/tree 50,000 20,000 5,000 333

37 Banana VND/clump 30,000 15,000 3,000

38 Pine apple 5,000

B WOOD TREE

1 Bamboo, nulgar bamboo VND/clump 420,000 300,000 200,000 80,000

2 Invory bamboo VND/clump 210,000 150,000 100,000 40,000

3 Eucalyptus, bead tree VND/clump 30,000 25,000 15,000 4,000

4 Cajuput VND/tree 10,000 8,000 2,000 1,500

5 Sao, dầu VND/tree 250,000 220,000 110,000 15,000

5 Other timber trees VND/tree 180,000 80,000 40,000 20,000

II. LIVESTOCK

1. Principle to be compensated:

a- For aquaculture when at time of land acquisition as well as time for harvesting. will not be compensated

a- For aquaculture when at time of land acquisition but time is not for harvesting. Will be compensated

2. Method to calculate

Compensation level for damage when harvesting soon will be defined according to actual cost. In Case can relocate , will

be allowanced cost for removing and lost due to relocation : allowance level will be defined : 5,000 VND/m2 -10,000

VND/m2 of cultivated pond area.

III. COMPENSATION FOR RELOCATING GRAVES

− Earth grave: 6,000,000 VND/grave

− Normal grave (around by brick, stone, laterite, no tumulus): 8,000,000 VND/grave

− Semi- solid tumulus: 10,000,000 VND/grave.

− Solid Grave( foundation, top and roof ) grave with complicated architecture will be compensated for top of grave as

same standards as regulated in item 2 and 3 of this article, remaining part of grave will be compensated following

new constructed cost as regulated currently

− PC of commune level where land acquisition will create favorable conditions and guide to HH, individual to planed

cemetery to carry out relocation of grace as custom,habits,and regulation of environment sanitation

− For grave without owner, grave have owner but over limit of date of relocation. Organization for compensation,

support and resettlement implementation will hire to conduct relocation under supervision of commune PC where

land acquisition. Cost for relocation will follow as actual cost , but not over as regulated at item 1 of this article


Page 23 of 24

−

− Annex 6: Complaint Submitted by 9 HH on 16 September 2015

−

DONG THAP PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE

CENTER OF HOUSE AND LAND FUND

DEVELOPMENT


Independence – freedom- happiness

MINUTE

OF RESOLVING GRIEVANCE OF HOUSEHOLDS AFFECTED BY HW30 UPGRADED PROJECT – BYPASS CAO LANH

CITY , AN BINH COMMUNE, CAO LANH DISTRICT

Time of start of meeting: 03 PM dated 16/September/2015

Location of meeting: office of Center of house and land fund development of Dong Thap province

I- Participants:

1- Co HLFD:

Mr. Luu Minh Tri position: Director

Mr. Vo Van Don position: head of department of land fund development

Ms: Dinh Thi Minh Thao position: vice head of Department of land fund development

2- Representative for HHs

Mr. Nguyen Van Kieu

Mr. Thai Van Anh

Ms: Nguyen Phuong Trinh

Mr. Nguyen Thanh Vu

Ms. Huynh Thi Phi

Ms. Nguyen Thi Le

Ms. Nguyen Thi Be Hai

Mr. Nguyen Thanh Duoc

Mr. Nguiyen Van Nhan

II - Contents of meeting

Explaining grievance of HHs in HW 30 upgraded project – by pass Cao lanh city in An Binh commune, Cao Lanh

district ( land area are covering 2 projects ( bypass Cao lanh city and interchange of an binh branch of CW1A –

Construction project of cao lanh bridge

1- Mr.Nguyen Van Kieu’s idea:

Propose increase of compensation rate according to price of CW 1A – Construction project of Cao lanh

bridge passes An Binh commune, Cao lanh brigde

2- Mr.Thai Van Anh ‘s idea:



3- Ms. Nguyen Thi Phuong Trinh



4- Mr. Nguyen Thanh Vu’s idea



5- Ms. Huynh Thi Phi’s idea


Page 24 of 24



6. Ms. Nguyen Thi Le’s idea



7. Ms. Nguyen Thi Be Hai’s idea

Propose increase of compensation rate according to price of CW 1A – Construction project of

Cao Lanh Bridge passes An Binh commune, Cao lanh brigde

8. Mr. Nguyen Thanh Duoc’s idea

Propose increase of compensation rate according to price of CW 1A – Construction project of

Cao Lanh Bridge passes An Binh commune, Cao lanh brigde

9. Mr. Nguyen Van Nhan’s idea



II- Center of house and land fund development’s Opinion

After dialog with households, Co HLFD have got opinions as after:

1. Implement according to article 17 of decree 43/2014/ND0-CP dated 15/may/2014:

(People. Organization, private person having land acquisition they will have right to complain of land

acquisition as regulation of law

2. Of competence of district people’s committee as at article 18 of complaint law 2011: will resolve

grievance for first time with administrative decision , administrative action of themselves

3. Co HLFD will issue letter to report to Cao lanh district PC and propose Cao lanh district pc will solve

grievance to the HHs

Minute ended 16 h 30 same day , having reading for everybody listening together and unified signature

Representative of HHs representative of Co HLFD

Signed Luu Minh Tri ( signed )

1. Nguyen van Kieu

2. Thai Van Anh

3. Nguyen Phuong Trinh

4. Nguyen Thanh Vu

5. Huynh Thi Phi

6. Nguyen Thi Le

7. Nguyen Thi Be Hai

8. Nguyen Thanh Duoc

9. Nguyen Van Nhan

Date post:	29-May-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

VIE: Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project Dong Thap ......total of 49 persons are affected. 5...

Documents