View from DOE Office of High Energy Physics
AWLC14 • Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders 2014 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Illinois
May 12 – 16, 2014
Abid Patwa Program Manager
Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
Outline
Energy Frontier Program & Issues Accelerator R&D Program HEP Budget and Issues A few remarks on Snowmass/P5 Summary
2
This talk will focus on the overall HEP program with an emphasis on the Energy Frontier program, which includes research at LHC and future lepton colliders
DOE Office of HEP Organization
3
Experiment Research, Operations, Upgrades (incl. “generic” Detector R&D) Accelerator-based efforts
LHC-based areas:
DOE Office of HEP Organization
4
Experiment-based Research (incl. “generic” Detector R&D) Accelerator-based efforts
Linear Collider-based areas:
DOE Office of HEP Organization
5
ENERGY FRONTIER
HEP Energy Frontier Experiments
Main scientific thrusts • Tevatron at Fermilab (pp collider): DØ Collaboration, CDF Collaboration • LHC at CERN (pp collider): CMS Collaboration, ATLAS Collaboration
U.S. is single biggest collaborator in both ATLAS and CMS experiments at LHC • US-ATLAS: ~20% of the international ATLAS Collaboration • US-CMS: ~31% of the international CMS Collaboration
Lepton Collider (mainly ILC): initiated small, direct support (~6 FTE) for detector R&D efforts from Energy Frontier research program
• at universities through DOE grant awards • at Fermilab, and plan for FY15, at SLAC
Tevatron data as of August 2013; LHC data as of December 2013.
Experiment Location CM Energy; Status
Description of Science
# Institutions; # Countries
#U.S. Institutions
#U.S. Coll.
DØ (DZero)
Fermilab Tevatron Collider [Batavia, Illinois, USA]
1.96 TeV; Operations ended: Sept. 30, 2011
Higgs, Top, Electroweak, SUSY, New Physics, QCD, B-physics
74 Institutions; 18 Countries
33 Univ., 1 National Lab
192
CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab)
Fermilab Tevatron Collider [Batavia, Illinois, USA]
1.96 TeV; Operations ended: Sept. 30, 2011
Higgs, Top, Electroweak, SUSY, New Physics, QCD, B-physics
55 Institutions; 14 Countries
26 Univ., 1 National Lab
224
ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS)
CERN, Large Hadron Collider [LHC; Geneva, Switzerland / Meyrin, Switzerland]
7-8 TeV; 13-14 TeV Run 1 ended: Dec. 2012 Run 2 start: 2015
Higgs, Top, Electroweak, SUSY, New Physics, QCD, B-physics, and Heavy-Ion
177 Institutions; 38 Countries
40 Univ., 4 National Labs
583
CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid)
CERN, Large Hadron Collider [LHC; Geneva, Switzerland / Cessy, France]
7-8 TeV; 13-14 TeV Run 1 ended: Dec. 2012 Run 2 start: 2015
Higgs, Top, Electroweak, SUSY, New Physics, QCD, B-physics, and Heavy-Ion
190 Institutions; 42 Countries
49 Univ., 1 National Lab
680
7
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN Run 1 (proton) completed in Dec. 2012 Working with experiments to execute plan for
U.S. contributions to “Phase-1” [2018] upgrades • CD-0 approval: September 18, 2012 • CD-1 approval: October 17, 2013
― CMS: $29.2M – 35.9M ― ATLAS: $32.2M – 34.5M
Fermilab Tevatron (DØ and CDF) Working with DØ and CDF collaborations
on completion of legacy analyses as part of its ramp-down research program • most efforts completed in FY13 and FY14 • final papers (e.g., MW ): FY15
Current program Analyze and publish results from LHC Run 1 2013-2014 shutdown:
• splice repairs in LHC magnets (completed March 2014) • detector maintenance and consolidation • upgrades and repairs
In 2015: resume [Run 2] at 13~14 TeV: 100 fb-1
• Continue precision Higgs measurements • Focus on new physics
Energy Frontier Physics Program: Status
Tevatron
March 2014: First Joint Result of International Team of LHC and Tevatron Scientists
[Moriond 2014]
8
LHC is planned to be central component of the U.S. Energy Frontier program for next ~20 year – U.S. investments ⇒ leading roles in the [global] LHC physics collaborations
Considering major update to LHC around 2023 to extend discovery potential – high-luminosity LHC program (HL-LHC) to explore new physics and new dynamics for W/Z, top,
and Higgs at TeV energies • increase LHC luminosity by a factor of 10 beyond its design value • ensure U.S. scientists are at the forefront of full physics opportunities offered at the LHC
U.S. leadership in superconducting magnet technology generally, and now Nb3Sn in particular, is widely recognized and acknowledged
U.S. LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) aims to leverage this expertise to serve needs of HEP community – Consists of four U.S. laboratories:
BNL, Fermilab, LBNL, and SLAC – Aims to realize the full capability of the LHC
and maximize the discovery potential of U.S. investments in the LHC
Discussions with CERN about follow-on to LHC Agreement proceeding – Framework of an agreement currently under
review at U.S. Department of State – Necessary precursor to planning for “Phase-II” upgrades
Energy Frontier Planning & Issues (I)
9
Significant collaborations with other regions on future colliders will require a high-level approach between governments – We support an international process to discuss future HEP facilities that respects the interests of
major national and regional partners as well as realistic schedule and fiscal constraints
Japanese-hosted ILC under consideration – Preparations for ILC accelerator & experiments have been long in the making,
foreseeing a global project – Modest ground-level R&D efforts can continue as funding allows ― for e.g.,
• physics and detector optimization studies, including detector modeling and simulations • electron and hadron calorimetry development for SiD and ILD • technology choice for pixellated vertex detectors • development of particle flow algorithms • SRF R&D, including high-Q work; cryogenic cooling and engineering studies • beam dynamic studies
– Coordination and membership roles & responsibilities to ILC-based organizations • such activities have been enabled through past- and present-DOE funded groups to allow for
progress and to achieve key milestones towards global ILC efforts
In planning U.S. Energy Frontier science program―including LHC Phase-II and future colliders― Snowmass/P5 process is an important element, along with European & Japanese HEP strategies – Once P5 process is complete (~end-next week), we will be in a better position to evaluate future
U.S. priorities for the HEP program in detail
Energy Frontier Planning & Issues (II)
10
US-Japan Symposium on Advanced Science and Technology, April 30, 2013, Washington, DC – U.S. and Japan discussed cooperation in advanced science and technology – Speakers and discussions from MEXT, Federation of Diet members, DOE, academia and industry – Agreement signed
between U.S. [DOE] and Japan [MEXT] on cooperation in science and technology • HEP annex needs
to be drafted next
US-Japan
36th annual US-Japan HEP Cooperation Meeting, April 24-25, 2014, Tokyo, Japan – review ongoing US-Japan cooperative activities in HEP – Preceded on April 23 by a meeting between DOE/HEP and the Deputy Minister of MEXT
• Discussions on overall P5 process, ILC initiative in Japan, areas/opportunities for collaboration – During visit same week as part of Asia Tour, President Obama signed an extension to the bilateral
US-Japan Science and Technology (S&T) Agreement with Prime Minister Abe • nation-to-nation S&T agreement on cooperation in R&D that provides the legal “umbrella”
under which agency-to-agency international agreements reside
11
ACCELERATOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY R&D
Accelerator R&D develops basic science and technologies needed to design, build, and operate state-of-the art accelerators – Support world-leading research in the physics of particle beams and in accelerator R&D – Essential for making discoveries in HEP
Three broad categories: – Near- to mid-term directed R&D for specific facilities or technologies in support of DOE
projects [sometimes captured in a project’s Total Project Cost (TPC)] – Mid-term, facility-inspired R&D focused on specific concepts or technologies to
demonstrate feasibility and engineering readiness – Long-term, proposal-driven research on the fundamental science underlying particle
accelerators and beams to enable breakthroughs in size, cost, beam intensity, beam energy, and control
Applications to serve broader community ⇒ “stewardship” program initiated in FY14 – Discovery science, industry, medicine, defense and security, energy and environment – Strong connection between current R&D thrusts and accelerator R&D stewardship
program needs
Strategic plan for accelerator R&D will be re-evaluated after release of P5 report – Part of broader HEP Advanced Technology R&D program that includes Detector R&D – Will seek additional advice from HEPAP as necessary to fulfill mission
Accelerator Technology R&D Mission
13
• Existing state-of-the art conductors (Nb3Sn for LARP) sustain this performance only to 18 T
• LHC NbTi conductors sustain this performance only to 11 T
• This practical HTS magnet material is an isotropic round wire which can be cabled on existing machines
• Competing HTS materials are anisotropic tapes and not easily made into magnet cables
Achieved 500 A/mm2 at 30 T, 4.2K in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O
Impact This level of current density could technically enable magnetic field levels that double existing particle collision energies
Nature Materials - March 2014 DOI 10.1038/nmat3887
Record Current in High-Temperature Superconductor (HTS)
Current Density Across Entire Cross-Section
14
Final Assembly
Horizontal Test Stand Vertical
Test Stand
String Assembly MP9 Clean Room
Vertical Test
Stand
New Vacuum Oven
Cavity Tuning Machine
FNAL SRF Infrastructure
VTS2 Dewar
World-class infrastructure for SRF cavity processing, assembly, and testing
Simple processing tweaks can give very high-Q values • Simple hydrofluoric acid (HF) rinse adds 30% [A. Romanenko] • Nitriding in vacuum oven produces Q → 7 x 1010 [A. Grassellino]
The highest value measured here at Fermilab.
High-Q SRF Research
16
RF Source and Distribution System at SLAC
High-Power Waveguide Feed to ILC Cryomodules
Marx Modulator for ILC Multi-beam Klystron
High-Power, RF
Distribution System
17
HEP BUDGET AND ISSUES
Budget philosophy is to enable new world-leading HEP capabilities in the U.S. through investments on all three frontiers – Accomplished through ramp-down of existing projects and Research
FY 2015 President’s Budget Request for DOE/HEP is down -6.6% relative to FY 2014 Impacts to DOE/HEP:
– Several new efforts may be delayed but efforts underway to minimize impacts • FY15 request includes two MIEs for ATLAS and CMS detector upgrades (Phase-I),
required to leverage discovery opportunities at the LHC – U.S. leadership/partnership capabilities will be challenged by others
Key areas in FY 2015 President’s Budget Request – Maintaining forward progress on new projects while minimizing the impact of
reductions in Research to the extent possible – The FY 2015 budget request supports:
• Full operation of existing HEP facilities and experiments • MIEs for the ATLAS and CMS Detector Upgrades (Phase-I) • Planned construction funding profile for Mu2e • Capital equipment funding for LSST, Muon g-2, and towards Belle-II • Accelerator Stewardship funding for new research activities in high-impact areas
HEP Budget Overview
19
Research and Facilities Operations: – Energy Frontier: LHC data taking resumes in 2015
• The U.S. will continue to play a leadership role in LHC discoveries and is actively engaged in the initial upgrades to the LHC detectors
– Intensity Frontier: The Fermilab program continues its evolution as the leading accelerator facility on the intensity frontier
• The newly completed NOνA detector begins taking physics data in FY 2015 • Building several new experiments to access new phenomena that cannot directly
be observed at the LHC – such as Mu2e, Muon g-2, and the MicroBooNE experiments
– Cosmic Frontier: Advance our understanding of dark matter and dark energy • The recently-commissioned Dark Energy Survey continues its five-year mission,
looking for the subtle effects of dark energy in shaping the evolution of universe – this search will be significantly extended in the future by the Large Synoptic
Survey Telescope (LSST) now under construction • The search for dark matter will enter new territory with R&D and design of
selected next-generation dark matter detector technologies that can advance this field by an order of magnitude in sensitivity
High Energy Physics Budget Highlights (I)
20
Technology R&D: – A new HEP subprogram that focuses on the broader applications of HEP-developed
accelerator technologies known as “Accelerator Stewardship" • initiated in FY 2014 • expected to begin new pilot programs and open new funding opportunities in
2015 to address high-impact R&D topics
Construction/Major Items of Equipment [MIEs] – (see also following & back-up slides)
– Mu2e will complete its design phase in FY 2015 and move into full construction – Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) continues its design phase, which may
include enhanced capabilities based on the level of partnership contributions • potential LBNE international collaborators in Europe, Asia, and South America
have expressed interest – Funding is provided to initiate fabrication for new MIEs for the LHC Phase-I
detector upgrades – Continue planned funding profiles of existing MIE projects (e.g., Belle-II and LSST)
High Energy Physics Budget Highlights (II)
21
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%FY
199
6
FY 1
997
FY 1
998
FY 1
999
FY 2
000
FY 2
001
FY 2
002
FY 2
003
FY 2
004
FY 2
005
FY 2
006
FY 2
007
FY 2
008
FY 2
009
FY 2
010
FY 2
011
FY 2
012
FY 2
013
FY 2
014
FY 2
015
Research
Facilities
Projects
Other
Recent Funding Trends
In the late 90’s, the fraction of the budget devoted to projects was about 20% Many projects started since 2006 are coming to completion To enable new world-leading HEP capabilities in the U.S. during a flat (or declining)
budget environment, trading research ⇒ more projects – we have not yet been successful at raising the project funding fraction beyond ~15%
Trading Projects for more Research
Ramp up ILC and SRF R&D programs
Frac
tion
of D
OE/
HEP
Bud
get
22
FY 2015 High Energy Physics Budget (dollars in thousands)
Description FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request
Energy Frontier 149,446 154,687 153,639
Intensity Frontier 274,412 275,043 251,245
Cosmic Frontier 80,063 99,080 101,245
Theory and Computation 66,398 62,870 58,850
Advanced Technology R&D 142,291 122,291 114,242
Accelerator Stewardship 3,132 9,931 19,184
SBIR/STTR 0 21,619 20,595
Construction (Line-Item) 11,781 51,000 25,000
Total, DOE High Energy Physics 727,523 (a,b) 796,521 744,000
DOE Office of Science (SC) 4,681,195 5,066,372 5,111,155
(a) The FY 2013 Actual is reduced by $20,791,000 for SBIR/STTR. (b) FY 2013 Actual reflects sequestration.
SBIR = Small Business Innovation Research STTR = Small Business Technology Transfer
23
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request
Research 361,766 370,447 352,227
Facility Operations and Experimental Support 265,123 276,561 264,208
Projects 100,634 127,894 106,970
Energy Frontier 3,000 12,000 15,000
Intensity Frontier 63,494 37,000 24,970
Cosmic Frontier 19,159 24,694 41,000
Theory and Computation 3,200 3,200 1,000
Construction 11,781 51,000 25,000
SBIR/STTR 0 21,619 20,595
Total, DOE High Energy Physics 727,523 (a,b) 796,521 744,000
HEP Physics Funding by Activity (dollars in thousands)
(a) The FY 2013 Actual is reduced by $20,791,000 for SBIR/STTR. (b) FY 2013 Actual reflects sequestration [~$748.3M with SBIR/STTR].
24
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request Comment
1) Research 86,172 81,579 79,132 Redirect research to
LHC detector upgrades
2) Facilities 63,274 73,108 74,507
a) LHC Operations 56,912 56,774 55,522 US-CMS and US-ATLAS
Operations Program
b) Projects 3,000 (a) 12,000 (a) 15,000 CMS and ATLAS Phase-1 Upgrades
CMS Upgrade 1,500 6,000 7,500 First TEC request in FY15 (non-add)
ATLAS Upgrade 1,500 6,000 7,500 First TEC request in FY15 (non-add)
c) Other 3,362 4,334 3,985 IPAs, Detailees, Reviews
TOTAL: Energy Frontier 149,446 154,687 153,639
HEP Energy Frontier
Reductions in research funding primarily due to – Completion of the Fermilab Tevatron research program – Reductions in research activities to support current and future experimental capabilities
Offset by increase in funding for initial LHC detector upgrade activities
TEC = Total Estimated Cost (typically refers to Capital Equipment expenses) (a) In FY13 and FY14 appropriations, support for LHC Phase-I was contained under Energy Frontier Research.
25
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request Comment
1) Research 110,802 105,141 96,849
a) General Accel. R&D 60,705 57,694 47,620 Shift effort to directed R&D
b) Directed Accel. R&D 22,692 23,500 26,000 Need to meet deliverables
c) Detector R&D 27,405 23,947 23,229 “Generic” detector R&D program
2) Facility Operations 31,489 17,150 17,393
TOTAL: Advanced Technology 142,291 122,291 114,242
Includes General Accelerator R&D (GARD), Directed Accelerator R&D, and Detector R&D
Research activities reduced to offset: – Increased project funding – Shift towards more directed R&D activities to develop future experimental
capabilities
HEP Advanced Technology R&D
26
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request Description
Energy 1,500* 6,000* 7,500 LHC CMS Detector Upgrades
Energy 1,500* 6,000* 7,500 LHC ATLAS Detector Upgrades
Intensity 19,480 0 0 NOνA ramp-down
Intensity 5,857 0 0 MicroBooNE
Intensity 5,000 8,000 970 Belle-II
Intensity 5,850 9,000 9,000 Muon g-2 Experiment
Cosmic 1,500 0 0 HAWC
Cosmic 8,000 22,000 35,000 Large Synoptic Survey
Telescope Camera (LSSTcam)
TOTAL MIE’s 48,687 51,000 59,970
* Other Project Costs (OPC) funding was supplied in FY 2013 and FY 2014. FY 2015 is the first request for TEC funding.
HEP Physics MIE Funding (dollars in thousands)
27
Only able to implement two new MIE starts in FY15 request – ATLAS and CMS Phase-I Detector Upgrades
• Performance baseline and start construction for LHC Phase-1 Detector Upgrades: CD-2/3 (DOE Critical Decision) reviews scheduled for end-FY14 o CMS: August 5-7, 2014 o ATLAS: September 15-16, 2014
Other new MIE projects begun in prior years are requesting fabrication funds
required to maintain schedule – Belle-II (Tsukuba, Japan) – Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (Chile, South America) – Muon g-2 Experiment (Fermilab)
Long-term planning [P5] report will impact prioritization of future MIEs
– 2nd Generation Dark Matter (G2DM) detectors – Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)
MIE Issues
28
SNOWMASS & PARTICLE PHYSICS PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PANEL (P5)
Driven by the discovery of the Higgs, Snowmass outlined a research program at the Energy Frontier focusing on three fronts – Determine properties of the Higgs boson as accurately as possible – Make precision measurements of heavy particles that carry the imprint of the Higgs field, such
as W/Z and top – Search for new particles predicted by models of the Higgs and EWSB
Energy Frontier – Snowmass Vision
LHC
↓ HL-LHC
Precision study of Higgs properties at the few percent level Search for new particles Probe for new dynamics of W/Z and Higgs at TeV energies With ~5 x 108 observable tt events per experiment, study rare decays for signs
of new physics
Drives the Energy Frontier program forward for next 15-20 years
ILC
Sub-percent, model-independent study of Higgs properties Improved precision in our understanding of W/Z and top to allow discovery of
new physics New particle searches complementary to the LHC
Continue the Energy Frontier program with a lepton collider
30
Other studies initiated for future collider options – Future Circular Collider (FCC) ― Europe
• five-year international design study with an emphasis on 100 TeV hadron collider – Circular Electron-Positron Collider + Super pp Collider (CEPC + SppC) ― China
• Phase-1: CEPC Higgs factory (240-250 GeV); Phase-2: SppC (50-70 TeV)
Energy Frontier – Facilities
Hadron Colliders
Tevatron operations ended September 30, 2011 LHC operational since ~2010
• Phase-I LHC experimental upgrades now being executed High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) currently in R&D phase with installation ~2023 More distant options for higher energy being explored
• e.g., HE-LHC, VLHC
Lepton Colliders
International Linear Collider (ILC)
• Initiative from Japan to host • 5-volume Technical Design Report (TDR) published June 12, 2013 • Allows for staged approach to Ecm
More distant options for higher energy being explored • e.g., CLIC, µ collider, TLEP
31
LHC 100/fb (Run 2)
LHC 300/fb
LHC 3/ab
ILC 250/500
ILC 1 TeV
CLIC >1 TeV
Muon Collider
TLEP VLHC
yrs beyond TDR TDR LOI* TDR TDR CDR
Status: DOE EF Prgm. High Priority CD-1 Need further guidance from Snowmass/P5 Process
Physics Topics/Areas
Higgs Boson ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ EW Physics ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Top Quark ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ QCD Physics ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NP/Flavor ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Energy Frontier (EF) addresses questions across a comprehensive and broad range of topics studied at colliders (see R. Brock’s Aug. 6, 2013 Snowmass Summary talk for details)
Energy Frontier: Physics and Machines
Present machines and future proposed enablers advance our knowledge across each of these physics areas & organizational “groups”: Higgs, Electroweak, Top, QCD, and New Physics/Flavor
Orig
in o
f EW
SB
Orig
in o
f Fla
vor
ν m
ass
Orig
in o
f Mat
ter
Infla
tion
Stro
ng C
P N
atur
alne
ss
New
Spa
cetim
e U
nific
atio
n N
ew F
orce
s El
emen
tary
? Da
rk M
atte
r
*Technical Proposals and/or Reports beginning in 2014.
P5 will assess and prioritize HEP projects and provide a strategic plan for the U.S. than can be executed over a 10-year timescale, in the context of a 20-year global vision for the field
Key aspects of the charge: • Identify priorities with 10-year budget profiles but may well extend past the next decade
– consider technical feasibility as well as fiscal plausibility of future projects that can be executed in a 20-year timescale
– three budget scenarios, not as literal budget guidance, but as an opportunity to identify priorities and make high-level recommendations
• Appropriate balance of small, mid-scale, and large experiments • Maintain healthy and flexible domestic infrastructure; maintain leadership position • Consideration of possible international partnerships will be required • Articulate the opportunities which can and cannot be pursued and the approximate
overall level of support that is needed in the HEP core research and advanced technology R&D programs to achieve these in the various budget scenarios
• Among other factors, any developed plan should include a full understanding of the nature of physics to be explored at the LHC
• Effective communication on excitement / impact / vitality of HEP to non-science audiences
P5 report to be presented at HEPAP Meeting scheduled in the DC-area on May 22-23, 2014 • http://science.energy.gov/hep/hepap/meetings/
P5 Considerations
33
700,000
750,000
800,000
850,000
900,000
950,000
1,000,000
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
Year
8
Year
9
Year
10
Scenario A [Baseline: FY13 Actual]
Scenario B [Baseline: FY14 Request]
P5 Charge: Budget Scenarios ($
k)
Fiscal Year Prioritize an optimized HEP program under 10-year HEP budget profiles:
– Scenario A: FY 2013 budget baseline: flat for 3 years, then +2% per year – Scenario B: FY 2014 President’s budget request baseline: flat for 3 years, then +3% per year
• difference between Scenarios A and B integrated over the 10-year period: ~ $540M
– Scenario C (not shown in above plot): Unconstrained budget scenario. • beyond A and B, prioritize specific activities “ … needed to mount a leadership program
addressing the scientific opportunities identified by the research community.”
∆(Year 10) = $95.4M
P5 Subpanel’s “Ten-Year” Budget Profiles (w/ data points)
∆(Years 1, 2, 3) = $28.2M/year
FY14 Appropriations (signed Jan. 17, 2014)
FY14 CR [Oct. 17, 2013 - Jan. 17, 2014] (based at FY13 sequestration level)
FY14 President’s Budget Request
FY15 President’s Budget Request
34
Scientific opportunities & projects exceed current budget constraints • Prioritization is required • Budget scenarios P5 has to deal with are extremely tight
– therefore, not all projects can be categorized with a “high” priority
Program planning occurs in a global context while funding is national/regional • Planning must define U.S. role in the global HEP program, including the full landscape of
future experiments/facilities – as a participant in international experiments/facilities that are off-shore – as a host of international experiments/facilities in the U.S.
• Historically, this model has worked well, but is more challenging now with big facilities
Challenges & Issues to Strategic Planning
Once a strategic plan is available with community support behind it, we will be in a better position to advocate our [global] HEP program forward
Balance between short-term achievements and longer-term goals • Regular progress and achievements to convey to decision/policy makers • Required for training/career development • Invest in R&D efforts and construction for projects in the longer-term
35
Closing Remarks Energy Frontier activities primarily focused within two areas
• Efforts at LHC on ATLAS & CMS are now across 4 different fronts – complete Run 1 data analyses with ~400 Run 1 publications expected from each experiment – preparations for experimental operations during Run 2, which resumes next year – execute Phase-1 (2018) detector upgrades – initiate R&D for Phase-2 (2023) upgrades
• Modest R&D investments for future linear colliders can continue as funding allows Budgets
• FY14 appropriations has allowed projects ― delayed either by extended Continuing Resolutions or by the FY13 sequester ― to get moving
• However, FY15 budget request has indicated that without a clear and endorsed strategic plan, HEP has a weak basis to argue for more funding in a constrained fiscal environment
– additional new projects in FY15 will struggle to get started Actively engaged with the community in developing new strategic plan, which will be delivered
by P5 to HEPAP end-next week • Agencies will adapt new plan as quickly as possible • DOE/HEP expects the community to fully support the results of the P5 and Snowmass
deliberations – the U.S. Secretary of Energy has advised us (see Snowmass opening letter) to ‘get a plan’
and ‘stand behind it’ – this is needed so that the field will be able to move ahead
36
Announcement: DOE/HEP PI Meeting June 16-17, 2014 in DC-area
37
Meeting of all HEP Principal Investigators (PIs) including any co-PIs on an existing DOE HEP grant as well as those new [to DOE] PIs interested in applying to upcoming DOE Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) • Junior Investigators are particularly encouraged to attend
Date: Monday – Tuesday, June 16 – 17, 2014 Venue: Hilton Rockville Hotel, Rockville, Maryland (~20 miles North of Washington, DC) Registration: no registration fee, but registration encouraged to assist in logistical planning Additional information (includes agenda, registration, …): http://www.orau.gov/heppi2014/
Meeting will address the following topics • Overview of the HEP program, the P5 strategic plan in HEP • DOE/HEP’s initial plan for implementation of the P5 plan • General presentations on upcoming FY 2015 HEP Comparative Review FOA and
Accelerator Stewardship FOA • Presentations on major HEP projects and R&D opportunities • Presentations by individual DOE Program Managers (PMs) on subprograms, priorities,
budgetary factors, and guidance on preparing university grant applications • Topical discussions with HEP management • Opportunities for scheduled one-to-one and/or small group meetings with PMs
REFERENCE SLIDES
Office of
High Energy Physics Fundamental to the Frontiers of Discovery
HEP’s Mission: To explore the most fundamental questions about the nature of the universe at the Cosmic, Intensity, and Energy Frontiers of scientific discovery, and to develop the tools and instrumentation that expand that research.
HEP seeks answers to Big Questions: How does mass originate? Why is the world matter and not anti-matter? What is dark energy? Dark matter? Do all the forces become one and on what scale? What are the origins of the Universe?
HEP offers high-impact research opportunities from small-scale to large international collaborations at each of the three HEP Frontiers.
More than 20 physicists supported by the Office of High Energy Physics have received the Nobel Prize.
Accelerators
The Energy Frontier
Origins of Mass
Dark energy
Cosmic Particles
The Cosmic Frontier
Neutrino Physics Proton Decay The Intensity Frontier
HEP Physics and Technology
Physics Frontiers
Dark matter Matter/Anti-matter Asymmetry
Origin of Universe
Unification of Forces
New Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Experimental
Detectors
Simulation
Along Three Paths
Theory
Computing
Enabled by Advanced Technologies
From Deep Underground to the Tops of Mountains, HEP pushes the Frontiers of Research
ACCELERATOR SCIENCE — Supports R&D at national labs and universities in beam physics, novel acceleration concepts, beam instrumentation and control, high gradient research, particle and RF sources, superconducting magnets and materials, and superconducting RF technology.
RESEARCH AT THE ENERGY FRONTIER — HEP supports research where powerful accelerators such as the LHC are used to create new particles, reveal their interactions, and investigate fundamental forces, and where experiments such as ATLAS and CMS explore these phenomena.
RESEARCH AT THE INTENSITY FRONTIER — Reactor and beam-based neutrino physics experiments such as Daya Bay and LBNE may ultimately answer some of the fundamental questions of our time: why does the Universe seem to be composed of matter and not anti-matter?
RESEARCH AT THE COSMIC FRONTIER — Through ground-based telescopes, space missions, and deep underground detectors, research at the cosmic frontier aims to explore dark energy and dark matter, which together comprise approximately 95% of the universe.
THEORY AND COMPUTATION — Essential to the lifeblood of High Energy Physics, the interplay between theory, computation, and experiment drive the science forward. Computational sciences and resources enhance both data analysis and model building.
LHC b b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Injectors o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
t
LHC o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Injectors o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
LHC b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Injectors b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o b b b b b b b b b b b b o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019Q4 Q1 Q2
2020 2021Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q4
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q1 Q2 Q3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2Q3 Q4
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q32035
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q4Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Only EYETS (19 weeks) (no Linac4 connection during Run 2) LS2 starting in 2018 (July) ⇒ 18 months + 3 months Beam Commissioning (BC) LS3 LHC: starting in 2023 ⇒ 30 months + 3 BC Injectors: in 2024 ⇒ 13 months + 3 BC
Detailed LHC schedule ― Beyond Long Shutdown 1 (LS1)
Run 2 Run 3
Run 4
LS 2
LS 3
LS 4 LS 5 Run 5
LHC schedule approved by CERN management and LHC experiments spokespersons and technical coordinators Monday 2nd December 2013
LHC schedule approved by CERN management and LHC experiment’s spokespersons and technical coordinators: Monday, 2nd December 2013.
…...
The LHC Forecast: Luminosity vs. Year
L = 1027→ 7x1033 1 x1034 ~ 2 x1034
13 ~ 14 TeV 14 TeV √s = 7 – 8 TeV
<µ> = 20 (Mean # of
interactions per crossing;
i.e., pile-up)
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osity
(fb-1 )
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
<µ> = 27 <µ> = 55
Phas
e –
1 U
pgra
des
Phas
e –
2 U
pgra
des
2030
5 x1034
<µ> = 140
14 TeV
Phas
e –
0
[Shu
tdow
n]
Calendar Year
LS1 LS2 LS3 Run I Run 2 Run 3 Run 4
High Energy (HE) LHC High Energy (HE) LHC High Luminosity (HL) LHC
CD-0 was approved for upgrades to the ATLAS and CMS detectors on 9/18/2012
CD-1 was approved for upgrades to the ATLAS and CMS detectors on 10/17/2013 – Cost: $32.2—34.5M for ATLAS,
$29.2—35.9M for CMS The upgrades are a joint effort with
NSF, which expects to contribute another $10―12 million per project
The scope in both cases is primarily related to improving the trigger and data acquisition systems to handle larger data rates – U.S. CMS is also building
replacements for the Endcap Pixel detector
The U.S. projects are integrated into an international effort to upgrade the detectors.
There will be a long shutdown of the LHC in 2018 to install the upgrades
Requesting equipment funds in FY15 – CD-2/3 reviews for each detector
scheduled for end-FY14
Existing CMS Endcap Pixel Detector
LHC Phase-1 Detector Upgrades
Scope: Two superconducting magnets for CERN’s LHC Background: CERN requested the magnets to increase the reliability of
spares BNL participated in this type of magnet production for the US-LHC Project
Accelerator Project to Upgrade LHC (APUL)
Total Project Cost: $11,440k Schedule: CD4 – April 2014 Status On-track to finish on time, On-budget
High quality e- beams in a 6 GeV/m acceleration field • New FACET facility demonstrates
first acceleration of a witness bunch in beam driven plasma wakefield
• Accelerating Field 6 GeV/m, which is 300x that of the SLAC linac
• Important step towards meter scale high-energy plasma based accelerator
Plasma OFF: Plasma ON:
Witness
Driver
Both bunches have same initial energy
Impact New technology with potential for far lower accelerator size and cost
FACET data from SLAC
Recent Accomplishment —FACET
BELLA: 4.25 GeV beams from 9 cm plasma channel with 390 TW laser pulses • With conventional technology this
energy requires a 200 m long accelerator, a downsizing factor of 10,000
• Present investment in Laser Plasma Acceleration has potential to achieve ~10 GeV energy level in future experiments
• New BELLA facility commissions world-record petawatt laser for LPA science (>1 PW at 1 Hz)
Impact New technology with potential for far lower accelerator size and cost
9 cm long capillary discharge
Angl
e (m
rad)
Electron beam spectrum
1 2 3 4 5
Beam energy [GeV]
Recent Accomplishment —BELLA
Subscale Quadrupole SQ
0.3 m long 110 mm bore
LBNL Subscale Magnet SM 0.3 m long No bore
Technology Quadrupole TQS - TQC
1 m long 90 mm bore
Long Racetrack LRS 3.6 m long No bore
Long Quadrupole LQS 3.7 m long
90 mm bore
High Field Quadrupole HQ 1 m long 120 mm bore
Significant progress made towards
building magnets for future LHC upgrades
Continue to innovate in magnet design:
Superconducting Magnets
HEP Intensity Frontier Experiments Experiment Location Status Description of Science #US Inst. #US Coll.
Belle II KEK, Tsukuba, Japan Physics run 2016 Heavy flavor physics, CP asymmetries, new matter states 10 Univ., 1 Lab 55
CAPTAIN Los Alamos, NM, USA R&D; Neutron run 2015
Cryogenic apparatus for precision tests of argon interactions with neutrinos
5 Univ., 1 Lab 20
Daya Bay Dapeng Penisula, China Running Precise determination of θ13 13 Univ., 2 Lab 76
Heavy Photon Search
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA, USA
Physics run 2015 Search for massive vector gauge bosons which may be evidence of dark matter or explain g-2 anomaly
8 Univ., 2 Lab 47
K0TO J-PARC, Tokai , Japan Running Discover and measure KL→π0νν to search for CP violation 3 Univ. 12
LArIAT Fermilab, Batavia, IL R&D; Phase I 2013 LArTPC in a testbeam; develop particle ID & reconstruction 11 Univ., 3 Lab 38
LBNE Fermilab, Batavia, IL & Homestake Mine, SD, USA
CD1 Dec 2012; First data 2023
Discover and characterize CP violation in the neutrino sector; comprehensive program to measure neutrino oscillations
48 Univ., 6 Lab 336
MicroBooNE Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Physics run 2014 Address MiniBooNE low energy excess; measure neutrino cross sections in LArTPC
15 Univ., 2 Lab 101
MINERνA Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Med. Energy Run 2013
Precise measurements of neutrino-nuclear effects and cross sections at 2-20 GeV
13 Univ., 1 Lab 48
MINOS+ Fermilab, Batavia, IL & Soudan Mine, MN, USA
NuMI start-up 2013 Search for sterile neutrinos, non-standard interactions and exotic phenomena
15 Univ., 3 Lab 53
Mu2e Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA First data 2019 Charged lepton flavor violation search for 𝜇N→eN 15 Univ., 4 Lab 106
Muon g-2 Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA First data 2016 Definitively measure muon anomalous magnetic moment 13 Univ., 3 Lab, 1 SBIR 75
NOνA Fermilab, Batavia, IL & Ash River, MN, USA
Physics run 2014 Measure νμ-νe and νμ-νμ oscillations; resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy; first information about value of δcp (with T2K)
18 Univ., 2 Lab 114
ORKA Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA R&D; CD0 2017+ Precision measurement of K+→π+νν to search for new physics 6 Univ., 2 Lab 26
Super-K Mozumi Mine, Gifu, Japan Running Long-baseline neutrino oscillation with T2K, nucleon decay, supernova neutrinos, atmospheric neutrinos
7 Univ. 29
T2K J-PARC, Tokai & Mozumi Mine, Gifu, Japan
Running; Linac upgrade 2014
Measure νμ-νe and νμ-νμ oscillations; resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy; first information about value of δcp (with NOνA)
10 Univ. 70
US-NA61 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Target runs 2014-15
Measure hadron production cross sections crucial for neutrino beam flux estimations needed for NOνA, LBNE
4 Univ., 1 Lab 15
US Short-Baseline Reactor
Site(s) TBD R&D; First data 2016
Short-baseline sterile neutrino oscillation search 6 Univ., 5 Lab 28
CD-1 was approved September 18, 2012 with a cost of $15M
The U.S. will contribute new particle ID subsystems to the upgraded Belle detector at the SuperKEKB storage ring in Tsukuba, Japan
SuperKEKB is an upgrade to the KEKB storage rings and will produce two orders of magnitude more data – The physics will be concentrated
on rare decays of B mesons, searches for new physics, and precision studies of CP violation
FY 2015 is the final year of funding
for Belle II detector upgrade – All other activities supported in
FY2014 continue to be supported U.S. Scope
Belle-II
HEP Cosmic Frontier Experiments Experiment Location Description Current Status
# Collaborators (# US, HEP)
# Institutions (# US, HEP)
# Countries
Baryon Oscillation Spectrosopic Survey (BOSS)
APO in New Mexico
dark energy stage III (spectroscopic) operating through FY14
230 (150 US, 40 HEP) (22 US, 8 HEP) 7
Dark Energy Survey (DES) CTIO in Chile dark energy stage III (imaging) operations started Sept. 2013 300
25 (13 US, 9 HEP) 6
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) - Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC)
Cerro Pachon in Chile dark energy stage IV (imaging) science studies
232 (200 US, 134 HEP)
53 (41 US, 16 HEP) 3
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) - LSSTcam Project
Cerro Pachon in Chile dark energy stage IV (imaging)
CD1 for LSSTcam approved; FY14 Fabrication start ; CD3a May 2014
142 (111 US, 111 HEP)
17 (11 US, 11 HEP) 2
Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) KPNO in AZ ??
dark energy stage IV (spectroscopic)
CD0 approved Sept 2012; planning CD1 in FY14
180 (95 US, 72 HEP)
42 (23 US, 18 HEP) 13
Axion Dark Matter eXperiment (ADMX-IIa) Univ Washington dark matter - axion search operating 24 (20 US, 17 HEP) 7 (6 US, 3 HEP) 2 Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics (COUPP-60) --> PICO
SNOLab in Canada dark matter - WIMP search operating 60 (26 US, 8 HEP) 14 (6 US, 1 HEP) 5
DarkSide-50 LNGS in Italy dark matter - WIMP search operating 122 (66 US, 12
HEP) 26 (12 US, 3
HEP) 7
Large Underground Xenon (LUX) SURF in South Dakota dark matter - WIMP search operating
102 (86 US, 56 HEP)
17 (13 US, 9 HEP) 3
Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (SuperCDMS-Soudan)
Soudan in Minnesota dark matter - WIMP search operating 83 (70 US, 38 HEP)
19 (16 US, 6 HEP) 3
Dark Matter Generation 2 (DM-G2) experiment(s) TBD
dark matter Gen 2: 1+ direction detection experiments selected in mid-FY14 to move forward to fabrication
CD0 approved Sept 2012; Selection June 2014; planning CD1 in FY14
Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) FLWO in AZ gamma-ray survey operating 92 (74 US, 32 HEP)
20 (15 US, 5 HEP) 4
Pierre Auger Observatory Argentina cosmic-ray operating 463 (51 US, 12
HEP) 100 (20 US, 5
HEP) 18 Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (FGST) Large Area Telescope (LAT) space-based gamma-ray survey
June 2008 launch; operating in space
319 (157 US, 73 HEP)
49 (14 US, 3 HEP) 9
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) space-based (on ISS) cosmic-ray
May 2011 launch; operating 600 60 (6 US, 2 HEP) 16
High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) Mexico gamma-ray survey Fabrication; Operations starts late FY2014 111 (54 US, 8 HEP)
31 (16 US, 2 HEP) 2
LSST - Science Raft Tower
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Joint DOE/NSF project, with Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in place
– Large aperture, wide-field survey telescope for Chile, South America – Top-ranked large ground-based project in Astro2010 – DOE will supply the camera (LSSTcam) and NSF the
telescope and data management system – DOE’s interest is in Stage-IV precision measurements
of the nature of dark energy – The optical/NIR imaging survey will be used for a variety
of dark energy methods, especially weak lensing. – NSF will support a broad community program in astronomy
Status of LSSTcam MIE project: – CD-1 approved 4/12/12 with a cost estimate of $120―175 million – MIE Equipment funding start approved in FY2014. – FY2015 TEC requested to continue MIE fabrication
according to profile – CD-3a review in May 2014 – CD-2 baseline review in November 2014 – FY 2014 Budget for NSF includes MREFC funds for
LSST construction; expect to go to NSB in May 2014 to request permission to fund and start construction
DOE and National Science Foundation (NSF) are managing the project jointly
Reviews are charged by one agency or the other with participation from both agencies. – May 2012 - NSF held a Joint Interface & Management Review
to look at interfaces between the telescope and the camera – June 2013 - DOE Status Review of LSSTcam – NSF Final Design Review will be held in October
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in place between DOE and NSF
Joint Oversight Group (JOG) meetings held every two weeks Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is briefed
regularly
LSSTcam Project Status
BROADER IMPACTS OF HEP
The mission of the HEP long-term accelerator R&D stewardship program is to support fundamental accelerator science and technology development of relevance to many fields and to disseminate accelerator knowledge and training to the broad community of accelerator users and providers.
Strategies: Improve access to national laboratory accelerator facilities and resources for
industrial and for other U.S. government agency users and developers of accelerators and related technology;
Work with accelerator user communities and industrial accelerator providers to develop innovative solutions to critical problems, to the mutual benefit of our customers and the DOE discovery science community;
Serve as a catalyst to broaden and strengthen the community of accelerator users and providers
Strategic plan sent to Congress in October 2012 Incorporated into FY2014 Budget Request as new subprogram in HEP
The Accelerator R&D Stewardship Program
Connecting Accelerator R&D to Science and to End-User Needs
HEP BUDGET REFERENCE SLIDES
FY 2015 HEP Budget Request by Activity (in $K)
352,227
264,208
20,595
15,000
24,970
41,000
1,000 25,000
106,970
Research
Facility Operations andExperimental SupportSBIR/STTR
Projects: Energy Frontier
Projects: Intensity Frontier
Projects: Cosmic Frontier
Projects: Theory andComputationProjects: Construction
See following budget tables for further details.
Projects Allocation:
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request
Construction Total (TEC) 11,781 51,000 25,000
1) Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (TPC) 17,888 26,000 10,000
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 3,781 16,000 0
Other Project Costs (OPC) 14,107 10,000 10,000
2) Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (TPC) 10,500 35,000 25,000
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 8,000 35,000 25,000
Other Project Costs (OPC) 2,500 0 0
Funding provided consistent with the planned profile for construction of the
Mu2e Experiment No construction funding provided for LBNE
HEP Physics Construction Funding (dollars in thousands)
TEC = Total Estimated Cost (typically refers to Capital Equipment expenses) TPC = Total Project Cost
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request Comment
Research 52,860 52,562 51,459
Facilities 158,058 185,481 174,816
Expt Ops 7,354 7,245 6,986 Offshore and offsite Ops
Fermi Ops 132,928 156,438 152,096 Full operations for NOνA
B-factory Ops 1,594 4,600 0 End of BaBar disassembly
Homestake* 14,000 15,000 15,000
Other 2,182 2,198 734 GPE & waste management
Projects 63,494 37,000 24,970
Current 52,794 27,000 19,970 Belle-II ramp down
Future R&D 10,700 10,000 5,000
TOTAL: Intensity Frontier 274,412 275,043 251,245 Reductions dominated by:
– Ramp-down of funding associated with current projects (particularly NOvA)
– SLAC B-factory operations funding eliminated as planned disassembly work completed
Partially offset by increase in funding for: – Initial operations of upgraded NuMI beam for NOvA – Refurbishment of portions of Fermilab Accel. Complex – Support for R&D/fabrication of current/future
experiments
HEP Intensity Frontier
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request
Research 48,652 62,364 48,553
Facilities 12,252 12,022 11,692
Projects 19,159 24,694 41,000
Current 9,500 23,200 41,000
Future R&D 9,659 1,494 0
TOTAL: Cosmic Frontier 80,063 99,080 101,245
Funding increases dominated by: – Ramp-up of the LSSTcam MIE according to planned profile
Funding for research activities decreases – Redirected to R&D and planning efforts for next generation dark matter and
dark energy experiments
HEP Cosmic Frontier
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request Comment
Research 63,198 59,670 57,850
Theory 54,621 51,196 49,630 Follows programmatic reductions in Research
Computational HEP 8,577 8,474 8,220 As above
Projects 3,200 3,200 1,000 Transition year
TOTAL: Theory and Computation 66,398 62,870 58,850
Funding for theoretical and computational HEP research is reduced to offset increased investments in future facilities
HEP Theory and Computation
Funding (in $K) FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Enacted
FY 2015 Request
Research 82 6,581 16,384
Facility Operations 3,050 3,350 2,800
TOTAL: Accelerator Stewardship 3,132 9,931 19,184
This subprogram focuses on the fundamental physics of charged particle beams and on accelerator technology that can broadly benefit fields both within and outside of HEP
Additional funding is requested to start new R&D efforts on: – Ion beam acceleration for medical use – Development of high power/high repetition rate lasers for the manipulation of
charged particle beams – Higher efficiency RF power sources
Funding also sought to allow the accelerator industry access to specialized test facilities at the national laboratories
Accelerator Stewardship
