Nigerian J Genet. 18(2003):36-43
Nigerian J Genet. 18(2003):36-43
CYTOGENETIC STUDIES OF F, HYBRIDS BETWEEN COWPEA (VIGNA
UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP) AND v. RHOMBOIDEA BURTT. DAVY
B. Aliyu
Department of Crop Production and Horticulture,
Federal University of Technology
P.M.B. 2076 Vola, Adamawa State ABSTRACT
Vigna rhomboidea is a hairy wild relative of cowpea that is a source of useful genes for
pubescence for incorporation into cultivated cowpea for the improvement of cowpea crop production
through insect resistance. Four hundred and eighteen interspecific and control pollinations were
carried out between a cultivated cowpea (IT84S-2246) and a V rhomboidea accession (Tl/nu 1455)
with the aim of obtaining viable interspecific hybrids. Pod set was observed to be low (2.9% from 268
crosses) on cow pea as seed parent and V rhomboidea pollen parent. Cytogenetic investigations on
chromosome homology on the FI hybrid plants suggest that the reduced fertility of the hybrids could
be due .to genetic imbalances in the gametes resulting from multivalent chromosome associations.
centricfusion of chromosomes, chromosome loops, chromosome breakages as well as chromosome
laggards.
INTRODUCTION Cowpea, an important pulse crop in many
developing countries of the world is susceptible to
several insect pests that significantly reduce its yield
potential. Sources of resistance to some of the insect
pests have been identified in some wild Vigna species
(Birch, et al., J 985; Singh, et al., 1990; Anon, 1988;
1996). Unfortunately, the
exploitation of interspecific hybrids for crop
improvement is complicated by incompatibility barriers
(Baudion and Marechal, 1991). The nature of the
crossability barriers between species and their mode of
origin has been
described by Smartt (1970) as being complex. During
hybridization studies with Phaseolus species, he
concluded that the genome and plasmon must both have
a common origin for normal fertility to occur. Monti
(1992) reviewed
the circumstances surrounding cross ability barriers
between species. He noted pre- fertilization and/or post
fertilization barriers as factors that prevents success in
crosses. Barone and Ng (1990) examined the cytological
abnormalities in pollen tube growth following crosses
between cowpea (V unguiculata) and wild V vexillata.
They concluded that lack of fertilization and/or collapse
of the fertilized ovules was responsible for the failure of
the
crosses. The failure of interspecific hybridization due to
embryo degeneration has also been reported (AI- Yasiri
and Coyne, 1960). Aliyu (2001; 2002) reported a
crossability percentage between cowpea (TVu t 627)
and a
Wild V rhomboidea accession (TVnu 1473) of
1.1% out of 116 crosses and observed that developing
crossed. pods always aborted. Although pollen-pistil
incompatibility .is an important barrier to interspecific
hybridization,
Stebbins (1958) cited in Barone et al. (1992) observed
that the failure of pollen tube growth and fertilization is
rarely the primary cause of reproductive isolation
between closely related species. It was shownthat
resources competition and not cross-genetic
incompatibility is responsible for the abortion of
embryos. The solution to overcoming crossability
barriers in interspecific hybridization involves
histological and cytological analysis in studying the
reproductive biology of the species, the FI embryo
development and the F I plants as well as
the use of molecular markers. This paper reports the
cytological abnormalities observed in the F I hybrid
plants in
crosses between cow pea variety IT84S-2246 and V
rhomboidea accession TVnu 1455.
MATERIALSANDMETHODS Materials
The seeds of the cowpea variety and V.
rhomboidea- accession were obtained from the Genetic
Resources Unit, International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture, liT A, Ibadan Nigeria. wherethe work itself
was done. Seeds of V. rhomboidea were first scarified
with a surgical blade to facilitate early germination. The
seeds were then pre-germinated in a controlled
Aliyu: Cytogenetics of hybrids of V. unguiculata x V. rhomboidea
environment (conviron) within the laboratory.
Seedlings at two-leaf stage were transplanted into
plastic pots in a screen house. Each pot was 20 cm in diameter and filled with garden soil. Two
seedlings were transplanted into each pot and this
was replicated four times. The pots were 1 m
apart within rows and 1.5 m between rows. Cowpea seeds were seeded directly in the plastic
pots at three weeks after transplanting V.
rhomboidea seedlings. The pots .were
completely randomized in the screen house.
Water was supplied by sub irrigation with a
minimum of top watering.
Crossing
268 interspecific crosses in addition to self
pollinations on the parent plants to serve as
controls were carried out. . Emasculation and
pollination were done according to the methods
of Rac hie et al. (1975)
Cytogenetic Protocols
Flower buds were collected at 7.00am,
9.00am, 10.00am and. 1 ).00am . inthe morning
hours. The buds were immediately fixed in a
freshly prepared mixture of acetic-ethanol in a
ratio of 1 part acetic acid to 3 parts ethanol and
stored in 70% ethyl alcohol.
Each flower bud was first placed on paper
towel to drain the alcohol. The bud was then placed
on a clean slide which was placed on a • Wild TYP
181300 binocular dissecting microscope with an
intralux 5000 illuminator. With the aid of 2 transfer
needles held in both hands, the bud was carefully
dissected and the anthers liberated on the slide. A
drop of 1 % aceto-carrnine was added. A cover slip
was then placed on the aceto-carmine-immersed
anthers. With the right hand thumb, the slide was
gently pressed between folded blotting paper. The
slide was then gently warned with a spirit lamp with
periodic tapping and addition of few drops more of
aceto-carmine. The preparation was finally
observed under a Leitz compound microscope.
Micrographs were taken with a WILD MPS 46/52
Photoautomat attached to the Leitz microscope.
The stainability of pollen of parental plants
as well as of the F 1 hybrids was examined. This
would provide additional information about
genetic affinities between V rhomboidea and V.
unguiculata. For each plant, five opened flowers
were picked at random. For
eachflower, pollen grains were shed on a clean slide
by using transfer needles. A drop of 1% aceto-
carrnine was added to the pollen on the slide.
Artifacts and debris were removed from the stained
slide with the tip ends of two transfer needles held
in both hands. A cover slip was finally placed on
the stain. Five slides were
made for each plant. Each slide was analyzed by
surveying five different fields at random on, the
microscope. Thus 25 fields were surveyed for each
plant. This was carried out for each of the parental
and F 1 plants and used to estimate the average
fertility of the pollen.
RESULTS Pod set within one week of crossing was
observed to be 13.8% out of which only 2.9% reached
maturity. The matured pods were malformed and the
seeds were shrunken. Pod set and maturity in the
control pollinations were, however, normal (Table 1).
The stainability of pollen in the hybrid was 41.6% as
compared to 98.0% for the cowpea and 95.1 % for the
wild parent. For a bud of 3 mm size, meiosis is
complete and the only structures to be seed would be
those of tetrad stage of pollen and matured pollen
.grains as well as disorganizedpollen grains that made
up 3 5.0% (Table 2). In this study young flower buds
of approximately 2 ,mm size yielded more meiotic
stages. At the same time buds collected and fixed
between 7.00am-8.00am yielded good meiotic stages.
However, slightly smaller or larger buds collected at
other times also yielded meiotic stages. Pachytene
bivalents (Figs. I and 2) and multivalent associations
with chromosome
breakage (Figs. 3 and 4) were observed. Metaphase
chromosomes of the first meiotic division (Metaphase
l )were also observed (Fig. 5). In this plate, bivalents
were clear and they can be seen to orient themselves
on the
equatorial plate. A notable feature in this pollen
mother cell is the presence of two ring bivalents at the
polar ends 0 the metaphase plate. Bivalents were also
seen undergoing separation after synapsis in
pachytene (Fig. 6). Centromeric regions were
conspicuous in some bivalents.
Chromosome laggards at anaphase I (Fig. 7)
and pachytene bivalents with loops (Fig. 8) were
also observed.
Nigerian J. Genet. 18(2003):36-43
Table1. Fertility (expressed as percent pod set) of eowpea, V rhombJlideq;,and their F, hybrid
F, Hybrid Number of Pollen stainability Pod set within 1 Mature
d Pollinations (%) week pods
Cowpea (IT84S-2246) 100 98.0 94.1 87.3
F, Hybrid 268 41.6 13.8 2.9
V rhomboidea (TVnu
1455)
50 95.1 81.0 73.5
Table 2. Percent frequency ofthe pollen mother cells for different stages of meiosis in the Ft hybrid of the cross IT84S-2246 x TVnu 1455
Size of flower stage of meiosis percent pollen
1 pre-PMC 8
2 Leptotene 2
Pachytene 13
Diplotene 3
Diakinesis 2
Metaphase I & II 15
Anaphase I & II 17
Resting 40
3 Tetrad stage 10
Pollen grains 55
Disorganized pollen grains 35
Interspecific hybridization is designed in breeding
programmes to transfer genes or relatively small
blocks of foreign chromosomes from a wild species to
a cultivated genotype.But incompatibility barriers
complicate the exploitation of interspecific hybrids
for crop improvement. Cytogenetic examinations
carried
out in this study showed the presence of ring bivalents
and multivalent associations in the F, hybrid plants.
Chromosome associations with a maximum of 4 and
3 bivalents per cell have been observed and were
reported to indicate a low degree of homology
between Elymus shandongesis x E. semicostatue (Lu
et al .. 1989). The presence of chromosome laggards
observed at anaphase 1 was an indication of delayed
chromosome movement during cell division. Ng
(1992) suggested that hybrid sterilityis due to
chromosomal and not genie
causes. However, in a hybrid with delayed separation
of chromosomes, infertility is under
genicmechanisms (Farms, 1963). In this study, .e low
fertility of the hybrids was due to imbalancesin the
genetic constitution of the geneticsTheobserved
chromosomal fragmentationalso agrees with the
findings of
Mehra and Rai (1970) who records chromosomal
fragmentation at prophase together with chromosomal
stickiness, arreste chromosomal movement and
distortion (normal location and orientation of
chromosom
at metaphase L
The presence -of laggards at anaphase indicates
that gametes will be nongeneticall balanced as a result
of the chromosoma differences. This, together with
the observe' multivalent associations, centric, fusion
chromosome breakage during division, as well as the
formation of chromosome loops isresponsible for the
low fertility of the F I hybrids whose chromosomes
were observed. Unfortunately, chromosome
homoiogy was not observed for the cowpea and V.
rhomboidea parents. Although cell division and
chromosom homology in these parent plants is
assumed to be normal, the opportunity to compare the
chromosome complements of the three genotypes was
not obtained. Consequently,conclusivedata for
chromosome association could not be provided.
Further studies on ' subject, incorporating the parental genotypes K recommended
.
Aliyu: Cytogenetics of hybrids of Jt: unguiculata x V. rhomboidea
Figure 1
Figure 2
Cbromosomes at pachytene (with artifads in the background) (Figure 1); and eleae. pachytene
. bivalents (Figure 2). (dOOO)
Figure 4
Multivalent association (Figure 3); and chromosome breakage (Figures 3 and 4). (x1000)
Aliyu: Cytogenetics of hybrids of v: unguiculata x Jt: rhomboidea
Figure 5
F
i
g
u
r
e
6
Figure 6
y. . u: Cytoge=":« of hybrids ofT. unguiculatax V. rhomboidet:
REFERENCES Aliyu, B. 2001. Inheritance of pubescence and genetic
compatibility between cowpea (Vigna unguiculata
L) ( Walp) and V. rhomboidea Burtt. Davy.
tJnpublishtdPh.D. Thesis, University of lbadan.
145p. Aliyu, B. 2002. Interspecific hybridization
between cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) and
V. rhomboidea Burtt. Davy through embryo rescue.
Nig. J. Biotechn. 13(1): 18-22. AI-Yasiri, S. A. and D. P ..Coyne. 1966. Interspecific hybridization
in the genus Phaseolus. Crop Science. 6:59-61. Anon, 1988. Annual report and research highlights.
p. 73. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture,
Ibadan, Nigeria. Anon, 1996. Project 16
(Conservation and Genetic Enhancement of plant
Biodivcrsity). Annual Report. International Institute
of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp. 10-11. Barone, A. and N. Q. Ng. 1990. EmbrologicaJ studies
of crosses between Vigna Unguiculata and V.
vexillata. In Cowpea Genetic Resources. Ng , .N
Q. and L. M. Monti eds. liT A, lbadan. Pp. 151-160. Barone, A., A. Del Guidice and N. Q. Ng. 1992.
Barriers to intcrspecific hybridization between
Vigna unguiculata and V. vexillata. Sexual plant
ReproductionS: 195-200. Baudoin, J. P. and R. Marechal. 1991. Taxonomy and wide crosses in
pulse crops with special reference to Phaseolus and
Vigna. InCrop Genetic Resources of Africa. Vol.
.nNg, N. Q., Perrino, P. Attere, F. and H. Zedan
eds. liT A, Ibadan. pp. 287-302. Birch, N., B. J. Southgate and 1., E. Fellows. 1985. Wild and semi-cultivated legumes as potential
sources of resistance to Bruchid beetle for crop
breeders. A study of Vigna IPhaseolus. In Plants
for Arid Lands.
Wickens, G. E., J. R. Gooden and D. V. Field eds.
George Alien and Unwin. London. Pp. 103-320.
Faris, D. G. 1963. 'Evidence for the West African origin
of Vigna sinensis (L ) Savi. Unpublished Ph.D.
Thesis, University of California, Davis. 94p.
Lu, B. R., B. Salomon, and R. Von Bothmer. 1989.
Cytogenetic studies of progeny from the
intergeneric cross Elymus muidroh xand E. x
secale. Genome 33,425,432 Mehra, R. C. and K. S Rai. 1970. Cytogenetic studies of
meiotic abnormalities in Collinsia tinctoria. I .
Chromosomal stickiness. Canadian Journal of
Genetics and Cytology, 12:560-569. Monti, L. M. 199.2. The use of wild species in crop
improvement. InBiotechnology: Enhancing
Research on Tropical Crops in Africa.
Thottappilly, G., Monti, L. M., Mohan' Raj, D. R.
and A. W. Moor eds.
CT A - lIT A. Pp. 55-62. Ng, N. Q. 1992. Wide crosses in Vigna food legumes.
In Biotechnology: Enhancing Research on
Tropical Crops in Africa. Thottappilly, G, L. M.
Mohan Raj, D. R. and A. W. Moor eds. CT A- lIT A. Pp. 77-80.
Rachie, K. 0., K. Rawal and J. D.
Franckowaik. 1975. Arapid method of handrossing cow
peas Technical Bulletin no. 2, lIT A, Ibadan, Nigeria.
18p.
Singh, S. R., L. E. N. Jackai, J. H. R. dos Santos and C.
B. Adalla 1990. Insect Pests of Cowpea. In Insect
Pests of Tropical Food Legumes S. R. Singh ed.
John Wiley. pp 43-89.
Smartt, J. 1970. Jnterspecific hybridization between
cultivated American species of the Genus
Sphaseolus. Euphytica 19:480-489.