+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Volatiles at Mercury’s surface

Volatiles at Mercury’s surface

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: gram
View: 41 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Volatiles at Mercury’s surface. David Rothery , Rebecca Thomas Department of Physical Sciences The Open University [email protected] Laura Kerber Lab Météorologie Dynamique du CNRS, Université Paris 6 HEWG, Key Largo, 15 May 2013. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
27
Volatiles at Mercury’s surface David Rothery, Rebecca Thomas Department of Physical Sciences The Open University [email protected] Laura Kerber Lab Météorologie Dynamique du CNRS, Université Paris 6 HEWG, Key Largo, 15 May 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Volatiles at Mercury’s surfaceDavid Rothery, Rebecca ThomasDepartment of Physical SciencesThe Open University [email protected] KerberLab Météorologie Dynamique du CNRS, Université Paris 6HEWG, Key Largo, 15 May 2013

Page 2: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Volatiles:

*Ice in permanently-shadowed craters *S in the regolith (2-5% from XRS, poor spatial resolution)*Explosive volcanism*Hollows

– cold-trapped cometary

– an ongoing process?

– need volatiles in magma to drive explosions

Page 3: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface
Page 4: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Head et al., (2009), EPSL, 285, 227-242

Page 5: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

‘Kidney-shaped vent’, RS03

Page 6: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

< -------------------- 65 km ------------------- >

Page 7: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Rebecca Thomas, Dave Rothery, Susan Conway & Mahesh Anand

Open University, UK

Hollows on Mercury

Hollows on the peak and floor of Eminescu crater (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 8: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

What are hollows?BCFDs viewed by Mariner 10 and MESSENGER flybys =

hollows.

Hollows over much of the floor of Hopper crater (left) and in a scattered cluster in another crater (right) (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 9: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Formed by sublimation?

a. Polar ‘Swiss cheese’ terrain on Mars, b. enhanced-colour image of hollows in Raditladi basin, Mercury.

a. b.

• Analogue: ‘Swiss cheese’ terrain• Form by sublimation of CO2 ice on Mars’ south

polar cap.• Similar morphology, though not a perfect

analogue.

Page 10: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

What didn’t we know?

• Global distribution of hollowing

• Composition of the material being lost.

• Source of the material being lost.

• Mechanism for removal.

Page 11: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Survey conducted

(JHU/APL & ACT)

20°wide strips, 22% of the planet’s surface

Page 12: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Clusters of hollows identified104 clusters, covering c.31,500km2

(JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 13: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How do hollows form?• Loss of an at least moderately-volatile substance.

• Removed without melting.

• Candidate mechanisms:• Sublimation

• Space weathering e.g. photon-stimulated desorption (PSD), solar wind sputtering (when s-w pushes magnetopause close to the surface )

• Micrometeorite bombardment (estimated to be too slow to form hollows, Blewett et al. 2011)

Page 14: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Controlled by insolation?• Relevant to sublimation and PSD – photon and heat-

dependent.• Hollows form on slopes with a preferred aspect in 20% of

cases.• Strong preference for sun-facing slopes: weak correlation

with insolation.

Page 15: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

On a regional scale:• 11.5x more hollowed area in the ‘hot pole’-crossing strip

than the ‘cold pole’-crossing strip.• Very few hollows in polar regions – though this may be due

to observational bias/substrate.

Controlled by insolation?

Page 16: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Solar wind sputtering?• Expected to be especially intense at polar and possibly equatorial regions.• Largest total hollowed area is equatorial.• But not consistent over all strips, and little hollowing in polar regions.• Contribution from solar wind sputtering not ruled out but not positively

supported.

Page 17: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Hollow-formation mechanisms: Conclusion• Sublimation and possibly PSD are best-supported due to correlation of hollows with insolation.

• Some loss by sputtering is not ruled out.• Weakness of the correlation to insolation suggests

• threshold is low or • another factor is more important, i.e. presence of hollow-

forming material at the surface.

Page 18: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Identifying the material being lost• 86% of hollow clusters

observed formed in regional or localised low reflectance material.

• Bright deposits appear to be the products of formation: on hollow floors and in diffuse halos around them.

LRM and hollowing in Chekhov crater (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 19: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Identifying the material being lost• Hollows form in the low reflectance

substrate.• Hollows do not form on smooth,

high-reflectance volcanic plains: none in northern plains, Caloris plains.

• Suggests the hollow-forming volatile is a component of low reflectance material and not of plains lavas.

Unnamed crater at the rim of Rembrandt basin. (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 20: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How does this unstable material reach the surface?

• Hollows occur within impact craters in 92% of cases.

• Suggests craters facilitate the transfer of the hollow-forming material to the surface.

• In most cases, the theory (Blewett et al. 2012) that they are exhumed during crater formation appears to be valid.

Atget crater in the Caloris plains (above) and Renoir basin (below). (JHU/APL & ACT)

1. Exhumation

Page 21: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How does this unstable material reach the surface?

Unnamed degraded crater at-57.4°E,58.3°N. (JHU/APL & ACT)

2.Later exposure• Old, degraded craters:

hollowing localized in superposed simple craters and thrusts crossing the crater.

• Suggests hollow-forming volatiles remained in the near-surface after hollowing ceased at the surface.

• Small impacts and fault-bend folding expose these to surface conditions long after crater formation.

Page 22: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How does this unstable material reach the surface?

Hollows and pitting in Sousa crater. (JHU/APL & ACT)

3. Migration through crater fills• Hollows form on crater fills

where they bury peak ring. • Rest of peak ring also has

hollows, rest of floor does not.• Pitted texture• Suggests migration through

floor material, undermining it.• Possibly also through

pyroclastic deposits.

Page 23: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How does this unstable material reach the surface? 4. Migration up crater-related faults?• Suggested by association with pyroclastic

volcanism: • 78% of observed pits have surrounding

hollows.

• All of these also have spectrally-red deposits.

• Pyroclastic pits form above crater-related faults e.g. terraces, peak structures.

• Both volatile-bearing magma and hollow-forming material migrate up crater-related faults?

Unnamed crater at -3.6°E, 25.6°N. (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 24: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

How does this unstable material reach the surface?

4. Migration up crater-related faults? cont.• Even in the absence of pyroclastic

volcanism, hollows often form preferentially on peak structures or terraces.

• But these faulted areas are also the areas exhumed from greatest depth.

• Exhumation and migration equally-well explain their localisation.

• Post-cratering migration from depth is not proved.

Unnamed crater at -3.6°E, 25.6°N. (JHU/APL & ACT)

Page 25: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Theory of hollows in a nutshell• Hollows form by the loss of volatile material which is a

component of low reflectance material.• This may occur by sublimation.• This material is exhumed from depth by impact

craters and may also migrate to the surface on a local or deeper scale.

• Suggests there is a globally-extensive subsurface volatile-bearing layer which is spectrally dark.

• What is it? • Cumulates? (Denevi et al., 2009) • Primary crust? (Rothery et al. 2010) • Certainly different from plains lavas.

Page 26: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Looking forward: Composition• If we can determine the

composition of the dark material and the bright products, we can: • constrain the formation

process and • begin to understand the

processes which lead to the accumulation of this deposit.

• The higher-resolution spectral data from BepiColombo will hopefully provide this information.

MPO, an artist’s impression (ESA)

Page 27: Volatiles at Mercury’s  surface

Theory of hollows in a nutshell• Hollows form by the loss of volatile material which is a

component of low reflectance material.• This may occur by sublimation.• This material is exhumed from depth by impact

craters and may also migrate to the surface on a local or deeper scale.

• Suggests there is a globally-extensive subsurface volatile-bearing layer which is spectrally dark.

• What is it? • Cumulates? (Denevi et al., 2009) • Primary crust? (Rothery et al. 2010) • Certainly different from plains lavas.


Recommended