+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1...

Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1...

Date post: 28-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
1 Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Events 1 Rebecca M. Harrington 1 and Emily E. Brodsky 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 595 26 Charles Young Drive East, 3806 Geology Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, Ph: 27 (310) 825-3212, Fax: (310) 825-2779 28 29 2 Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 30 95060, Ph: (831) 459-1854, FAX: (831) 459-3074 31
Transcript
Page 1: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

1

Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Events 1

Rebecca M. Harrington1 and Emily E. Brodsky2 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 595 26 Charles Young Drive East, 3806 Geology Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, Ph: 27 (310) 825-3212, Fax: (310) 825-2779 28 29 2 Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 30 95060, Ph: (831) 459-1854, FAX: (831) 459-3074 31

Page 2: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

2

Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 1

prior to eruption. Hybrid earthquakes comprise a class of these signals having 2

high-frequency onsets followed by low-frequency ringing. They are used 3

empirically to predict eruptions, but their ambiguous physical origin limits their 4

diagnostic use. Here we use seismic source spectra to show that the hybrid 5

earthquakes of the 2004 - 2006 Mount St. Helens eruption have a corner 6

frequency-seismic moment relationship that scales consistently with brittle-7

failure. The scaling is inconsistent with conventional hybrid source models 8

involving a resonating fluid cavity, and therefore hybrids should not be used as 9

direct indicators of subsurface magmatic fluids. The unusually low frequency of 10

these earthquakes can result from low rupture velocities combined with strong 11

path effects due to their shallow sources. This new application of near-field 12

instrumentation provides the first seismological evidence for brittle-failure as a 13

major process in dome building. 14

Volcanic earthquakes are commonly categorized by their frequency content in 15

order to distinguish their possible physical sources [Lahr et al., 1994; Chouet, 1996; 16

Neuberg, 2000; McNutt, 2005]. Much work focuses on low-frequency earthquakes, as 17

they are arguably the most poorly understood and most distinctive of volcanic systems. 18

Prolonged ringing of ground motions at frequencies ~1 Hz distinguishes them from 19

typical high-frequency volcano tectonic earthquakes, and is often thought to result from 20

either moving fluids or a resonating, fluid-filled conduit [Julian, 1994; Lahr, 1994; 21

Chouet, 1996; Neuberg, 2000]. Hybrids are a subset of low-frequency earthquakes, 22

characterized by high-frequency onsets. Some studies suggest that the onsets represent a 23

Page 3: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

3

separate trigger that initiates conduit resonance [Neuberg, 2006]. At some sites, hybrids 1

form a continuum with pure low-frequency events and therefore may be due to the same 2

mechanism [Neuberg et al., 2000]. 3

Either fluids or path effects account for the low-frequency portion of hybrid 4

waveforms. Extreme propagation effects are particularly problematic in volcanic areas 5

and can cause recordings of normal, brittle failure events to appear otherwise low-6

frequency [McNutt, 2005]. The protracted source durations inferred from low-frequency 7

ringing might be explained by trapped waves in the soft, loosely consolidated upper 8

layers of the volcanic edifice rather than a resonating fluid [Kedar et al., 1996]. Our goal 9

is to resolve the ambiguity between path and source, and by extension, the origin of 10

unusual seismic signals of volcanic hybrids. To do this, we first examine a raw record 11

section to investigate the scaling of duration with distance. We then adopt the Empirical 12

Green’s Function approach to separate the path effects from the source time function in 13

the seismic records at Mount St. Helens [Hough et al., 1991; Nakanishi, 1991]. We will 14

find that the source duration scales with moment in a way that is typical for brittle failure 15

events. We complete our study by discussing the physical mechanisms that account for 16

the unusual character of the seismograms. 17

The current eruption at Mount St. Helens commenced in late September 2004 18

with a series of steam and ash explosions, followed by extrusion of multiple brittle rock 19

spines with visible gouge that now form a new dome inside the crater [Pallister et al., 20

2006]. Abraded gouge at the base of the spines suggests that the seismicity associated 21

with the spine extrusions may result from brittle failure between the spine and the 22

surrounding rock [Pallister et al., 2006]. Periodic earthquakes characterize the 23

seismicity, commencing with high frequency onsets and transitioning to codas with 24

Page 4: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

4

spectral peaks at 1-2 Hz and durations longer than is typical for earthquakes of the same 1

magnitude in a standard tectonic setting. There is a lack of purely high-frequency 2

volcano tectonic events, and the hybrid codas do not show the monochromatic peaked 3

spectra found for some occurrences of volcanic tremor. The high-frequency onsets, and 4

long-period, long-duration codas are features shared by hybrid earthquakes seen at other 5

volcanoes such as Montserrat, Redoubt, and Deception Island [Lahr et al., 1994; Miller et 6

al., 1998; Neuberg et al., 2000; Ibanez et al., 2003] (Figure 1). The data for volcanoes 7

other than Mount St. Helens is limited, but the waveform similarity indicates that hybrid 8

events are similar. 9

The seismograms in Fig. 1 depict hybrids recorded at distances ≥ 1 km from their 10

hypocenters; however, increased instrumentation at Mount St. Helens in early 2005 11

provides records as close as ~100 meters from the active spine. The particularly 12

hindering path effects in a volcano make close stations crucial to analyzing earthquake 13

source processes. For example, a record section of a ML 1.1 event on February 26th, 2005 14

depicts an increased recorded event duration with increasing station distance, 15

demonstrating the extreme scattering effects along the path (Figures 2-3). The shaking 16

duration of 3 seconds at the closest station, MIDE, provides an upper bound on source 17

duration. Although substantially less than the 20-second duration seen at distant sites, it 18

is still two orders of magnitude longer than typical source durations for ordinary 19

earthquakes of this magnitude. To determine whether or not this duration is due to source 20

or path we isolate source spectra using the Empirical Green’s Function approach, and 21

investigate their scaling. 22

Because the Mount St. Helens hybrids have extremely similar waveforms and are 23

likely located in nearly the same place along the extruding spine, they are well suited for 24

Page 5: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

5

using an Empirical Green’s Function. We deconvolve the smallest observable event with 1

spectral amplitude visible above noise on station MIDE with the larger events on that 2

station to obtain the source time functions of the larger events (Figure 4). We use the 3

entire length of the larger event for the deconvolution in order to ascertain that the 4

source-time function has effectively zero amplitude in the coda. Stations MIDE and 5

NED in the Cascades Chain network are closest to the extruding spine, and therefore 6

record the widest dynamic range of events. Using both the high- and low-gain channels 7

also increases the dynamic range of events used. Using the source-time functions 8

obtained by the Empirical Green’s Function deconvolution, we fit the seismic moment 9

and corner frequency of the source-time spectra using a least-squares curve fit to a f2 10

spectrum [Boatwright, 1978; Abercrombie, 1995; Ide et al., 2003], 11

!

"(f) ="0

1+(f / fc )4[ ]1/ 2

(1) 12

where fc is corner frequency, and Ω0 is long period amplitude (Figure 5). We did not use 13

any attenuation coefficients in the fit because we make the common assumption that the 14

distortion due to propagation and the attenuation through the heterogeneous medium is 15

linear over the magnitude range considered, and that the Empirical Green’s Function 16

deconvolution removes these effects [Hough, 1991]. 17

Another logical approach to constraining the source of these events would be moment 18

tensor inversion. Previous research on low-frequency earthquakes suggested a source 19

model involving fluid motion and therefore including some volumetric component 20

[Julian, 1994; Chouet, 1996; Neuberg, 2000]. A non-double couple source could in 21

principle be identified through a full waveform inversion [Chouet et al., 2003]. 22

However, given the site’s limited near-field station coverage, unconstrained velocity 23

Page 6: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

6

structure, and significant scattering (Fig. 2), an alternate approach is preferable 1

[Hardebeck and Shearer, 2002]. 2

Earthquakes generated by a shear dislocation on a 2-D surface are mathematically 3

equivalent to a distribution of double-couples with total moment proportional to the 4

average slip multiplied by the fault area [Burridge and Knopoff, 1964]. The seismic 5

moment for a planar fault is proportional to the product of the stress drop !" and the 6

rupture length cubed. For a circular fault 7

!"=3

0

7

16aM (2) 8

where a is the radius of the rupture. The source radius can be measured from 9

seismograms using the corner frequency cf and the relationship 10

cfa /315.0 != (3) 11

which relates corner frequency to fault geometry, where ! is the shear velocity 12

[Madariaga, 1976]. Combining eq. 1 and 2, implies that 13

3

0

!" cfM (4) 14

if stress drop is size-independent. Although the constants in eqs. (2) and (3) are model-15

dependent, eq. (4) is a robust relationship for double-couple events and is commonly 16

observed for tectonic earthquakes [Kanamori and Anderson, 1975; Abercrombie, 1995]. 17

Figure 6 shows that the correlation between the M0 and fc of the Mount St. Helens hybrids 18

is consistent with the model of a standard 2-D fault. The corner frequency, fc, is 19

proportional to M0 on a logarithmic plot with a slope of -3.3 +- 0.3 (errors are 1 standard 20

deviation of 10,000 bootstrap trials). Examples of the spectra on which the M0, and fc, 21

values of Figure 6 are based are shown in Figure 5. Therefore, a source model of shear 22

Page 7: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

7

failure on a crack with constant stress drop is consistent with the data. 1

Many models for hybrids focus on a resonating fluid-filled conduit as the source 2

of the prolonged low-frequency waves. In the simplest model of a linear organ pipe, the 3

frequency content of the signal is determined entirely by geometry and there is no reason 4

that the amplitude (or moment) should scale with frequency in any particular relationship. 5

Julian proposes a more complex model where the frequency of oscillation is dependent 6

on the strength of the resonating wave due to a coupling between the fluid and elastic 7

systems [1994]. However, even in this nonlinear oscillator, there is no reason that the 8

amplitude (and moment) should scale according to the relationship in equation (4). 9

Although the M0 - fc relationship of the Mount St. Helens hybrids scales in the 10

same way as typical earthquakes, the corner frequencies are lower than expected for a 11

given moment. This suggests that rupture velocity, VR, is low. For example, the local 12

moment magnitudes of the earthquakes in Figure 6 range from 0.2 to 1.5 and corner 13

frequencies range from 5 to 14 Hz, whereas corner frequencies for tectonic earthquakes 14

in this magnitude range are more on the order of tens of Hz [Abercrombie, 1995; Ide, 15

2003; Venkataraman, 2006]. Earthquake locations and time-lapse photographs of 16

concurrent motion suggest that the earthquakes occur on the rock spine in the crater 17

[Moran et al., 2005]. This unusual situation constrains the absolute epicenter of the 18

earthquakes and therefore measures the seismic wave velocities. Using S-P arrival time 19

and the relation between P and S velocity in a Poisson solid, we calculate the P- and S-20

velocity in the path to that station. Repeating this for all of the stations within 5 km 21

produces an average value of 700 m/s for the S-velocity, β. Rayleigh wave velocity, 22

which has a half-space value of 0.9β, generally limits rupture velocity. This estimation 23

Page 8: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

8

implies a rupture velocity of 650 m/s or less, much lower than typical values of 2-3 km/s 1

at ordinary tectonic sites. The low rupture velocity is the origin of the apparently low 2

corner-frequency of the hybrids, and this combines with strong scattering in the 3

heterogeneous volcanic crust to yield the unusual hybrid seismograms. 4

Our analysis clearly indicates a source with a spectral scaling consistent with 5

brittle failure. However, it is still possible that the path from the earthquake to the 6

receiver includes a resonating fluid-filled cavity that responds to all the hybrid events and 7

is therefore lumped into the path term of our analysis. We evaluate this possibility using 8

Fig. 2. The increased duration of the waveform with increased distance implies the 9

scattering attenuation is large. In fact, an amplitude decay by a factor ~103 between 10

stations MIDE and JUN, at distances of 0.110, and 6.2 km from the crater, implies that 11

scattering Q is approximately 10. As is common in scattering attenuation studies, we 12

assume that the duration of the coda increases linearly with distance, and extrapolate the 13

trend to the source duration inferred from the moment estimation of the source-time 14

function obtained from the Empirical Green’s function deconvolution [Aki and Richards, 15

2002]. Using an e-1 decay time as a measurement of duration yields a duration of 0.9 s at 16

a distance of 60 m. While this procedure does not determine the source duration directly, 17

it is a tool to evaluate the extent to which path attenuation outside the conduit makes the 18

source appear extended at the closest stations. Since a resonating conduit should extend 19

the duration of the waveform as recorded near the source, the resonating waves can only 20

account for at most an extension of 0.8 s in the signal. A resonating pipe is not producing 21

the key features of this signal as observed at more typical stations distances of a few 22

kilometers and therefore the extended durations in Fig. 2 cannot be taken as evidence of a 23

Page 9: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

9

fluid-filled conduit. 1

Figure 6 implies the self-similarity of earthquakes down to Mw 0.2 (the smallest 2

magnitude shown). By combining equations (2) and (3), we see that fitting a straight line 3

to the data in Figure 6 requires that the quantity

!

"#$ 3 must be constant. There is no 4

compelling reason to assume that either β or rupture velocity varies dramatically with 5

size, and hence no reason to assume that stress drop does either. This self-similarity for 6

small earthquakes is consistent with results shown by Abercrombie, however we are able 7

to extend these results down to a smaller magnitude [1995]. 8

In summary, the Mount St. Helens earthquakes produce unusual seismograms 9

typical of volcanic hybrids, yet our analysis shows that their M0/fc relationship is 10

consistent with standard tectonic earthquakes and might be explained simply by brittle- 11

failure in combination with a very complicated path and low rupture velocities. This 12

seismic evidence for the prevalence of brittle failure events favors new eruptive models 13

that use stick-slip failure as the primary mechanism of dome growth [Iverson, 2005]. 14

Furthermore, the data imply that earthquakes are scale invariant down to Mw 0.2 with 15

typical stress drops of ~0.5 MPa. 16

Hybrid earthquakes occur at many volcanoes, and are often precursors to 17

explosive eruption. The continuum of frequency spectra between hybrids and other low-18

frequency events implies that all of these types of earthquakes may share the same type 19

of mechanism [Neuberg et al., 2000]. Our study shows that in some cases hybrids are 20

consistent with brittle failure, suggesting that fluids are no more necessary to explain the 21

generation of these seismic waves than to explain ordinary earthquakes. Therefore, 22

hybrid earthquakes on volcanoes do not directly and definitively indicate the movement 23

Page 10: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

10

of a free fluid. Although copious hybrids, or earthquakes of any type, may be useful 1

indicators of magma pressurization on surrounding rock and hence impending eruptions, 2

they are unfortunately not fingerprints of magma on the move. 3

Acknowledgements 4

The seismic data used here was collected by the Cascades Volcano Observatory 5

(CVO) and the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (PNSN), and distributed by the 6

Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) Consortium. This work was 7

funded in part by the National Science Foundation. We thank Thorne Lay for the use of 8

his empirical Green’s function code. We thank Seth Moran and the staff at CVO for their 9

extensive support during the ongoing eruption, and many valuable insights. 10

11

12

13

Page 11: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

11

1

2

Figure 1. Seismograms for typical hybrid earthquakes at Mount St. Helens, Montserrat, 3

Redoubt and Deception Island [Chouet, 1994; Miller, 1998; Ibanez, 2003; Neuberg et al., 4

2000]. No obvious differences are apparent between hybrid earthquakes at different 5

volcanoes, suggesting that the physical process causing these events is similar. (All 6

stations recordings are ≥ 1 km from the earthquakes). 7

Page 12: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

12

1

Figure 2. Seismic record section plot of a ML 1.1 hybrid earthquake on February 26, 2005 2

in the crater at Mount St. Helens. Amplitudes have been normalized by the peak for each 3

trace. The plot shows the duration lengthening with increasing distance from the crater. 4

P-, S- and Rayleigh wave arrivals are annotated on the signal for STD (the only 3-5

component station shown), where Rayleigh waves were identified using particle motion 6

plots with a band-pass filter of 0.5-2 Hz. The “X” at each station denotes the time 7

duration required for the amplitude to decay to e-1 times the value of the peak amplitude 8

(see text). The “O” indicates the intersection of the trend with the source length as 9

determined by the corner frequency. 10

11

12

Page 13: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

13

1

Figure 3. Seismic Record section shown in Figure 2 band-passed using a 2-pass 2

Butterworth filter from 1-2 Hz to show the peak frequency of this event. Amplitudes 3

have been normalized by the peak of each trace to show the lengthening of duration with 4

distance from the source. This plot shows that source duration is no more protracted 5

above the noise at the dominant low-frequency of 1.6 Hz than the unfiltered record. 6

7

Page 14: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

14

1 Figure 4. Source time function of the earthquake shown in Figure 2, obtained by an 2

Empirical Green’s Function deconvolution on data from station MIDE. The amplitude is 3

the relative amplitude to the smaller event used in the spectral division. The spectral fit 4

yields a Moment of 5.5 X 1010 Nm, and a corner frequency of 7 Hz. 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Page 15: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

15

1 2 3

Event Mw M0 (Nm) Relative Ω0 fc (Hz) (a) 0.07 1.5 X 109 -- 13 (b) 1.1 5.5 X 1010 69 7 (c) 1.0 3.4 X 1010 42 6 (d) 1.3 1.3 X 1011 156 6 (e) 0.9 2.8 X 1010 35 8 (f) 1.1 6.5 X 1010 81 7

4 Figure 5. (a) Example of a small event used as the denominator in spectral division 5

(Empirical Green’s function analysis) for the February 2005 events at station MIDE. 6

The absolute moment of this event gives the moment of each event using the relative value 7

of Ω0. (b)-(f) Examples of source time function spectra; solid lines indicate data, and 8

dashed lines indicate the fit of eqn. 3. Example (b) is the same event as shown in Figure 2. 9

The table indicates the values obtained from the fit of eqn. (3). 10

Page 16: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

16

1

Figure 6. Logarithmic plot of M0 vs. corner frequency, fc, modeled from the source time 2

functions of the Mount St. Helens hybrids in 2005. Both high- and low-gain channels 3

from stations MIDE and NED of the Cascades chain are used for the Empirical Green’s 4

Function deconvolution. A least-squares fit gives a slope of 3.3 ± 0.3, which is consistent 5

with the standard model of a 2-D fault. Most of the earthquakes have stress drops of 6

about 0.5 MPa, falling well within the typical range of values for earthquakes (0.1 to 100 7

MPa)(14). 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Page 17: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

17

References 1

Abercrombie, R. E. (1995), Earthquake source scaling relationships from -1 to 5 M(L) 2 using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth, J. Geophys. Res., 100(B12), 24,015–24,036. 3

Aki, K., Richards, P. G. (2002), Quantitative seismology, ed. 2nd, pp. xviii, 700, 4 University Science Books, Sausalito, CA. 5

Boatwright, J. (1978), Detailed spectral analysis of 2 small New-York-state Earthquakes, 6 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 68, (4), 1117-1131. 7

Burridge, R., Knopoff, L. (1964), Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations, Bulletin 8 of the Seismological Society of America 54, 1875-1888. 9

Chouet, B. A., Page, R. A., Stephens, C. D., Lahr, J. C., Power, J. A. (1994), Precursory 10 swarms of long-period events at Redoubt volcano (1989-1990), Alaska—Their Origin and 11 use as a forecasting tool, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 62 (1-4), 95-12 135. 13

Chouet, B. A. (1996), Long-period volcano seismicity: Its source and use in eruption 14 forecasting, Nature 380 (6572), 309-316 15

Chouet, B., Dawson, P., Ohminato, T., Martini, M., Saccorotti, G., Giudicepietro, F., De 16 Luca, G., Milana, G., Scarpa, R. (2003), Source mechanisms of explosions at Stromboli 17 Volcano, Italy, determined from moment-tensor inversions of very-long-period data, 18 Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth 108(B1), 2019, doi:10.1029/2002JB001919. 19

Hardebeck, J. L., Shearer, P. M. (2002), A new method for determining first-motion focal 20 mechanisms, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92, (6), 2264-2276. 21

Hough, S. E., Seeber, L., Lernerlam, A., Armbruster, J. C., Guo H. (1991), Empirical 22 Greens-function analysis of Loma-Prieta aftershocks, Bulletin of the Seismological Society 23 of America 81, (5), 1737-1753. 24

Ibanez, J. M., Carmona, E., Almendros, J., Saccorotti, G., Del Pezzo, E., Abril, M., 25 Ortiz, R. (2003), The 1998-1999 seismic series at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica, 26 Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 128, 65-88. 27 28 Ide, S., G. C. Beroza, S. G. Prejean, and W. L. Ellsworth (2003), Apparent break in 29 earthquake scaling due to path and site effects on deep borehole recordings, J. Geophys. 30 Res., 108(B5), 2271, doi:10.1029/2001JB001617. 31

Iverson, R. M. (2005), A Dynamical Model of Seismogenic Dome Extrusion, Mount St. 32 Helens, 2004-2005, Eos Trans. AGU, 86(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract V52B-04 33

Julian, B. R. (1994), Volcanic tremor: Nonlinear excitation by fluid flow, J. Geophys. Res., 34 99(B6), 11,859–11,878. 35

Kanamori, H., Anderson, D. L. (1975), Theoretical Basis of some empirical reltions in 36 seismology, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65, 1073-1095. 37

Kedar, S., Sturtevant, B., Kanamori, H. (1996), The origin of harmonic tremor at Old 38 Faithful Geyser, Nature 379, 708-711. 39

Page 18: Volcanic Hybrid Earthquakes that are Brittle-Failure Eventsbrodsky/reprints/harr_brodsky.pdf · 2 1 Volcanoes commonly generate a variety of low-frequency seismic signals 2 prior

18

Lahr, J. C., Chouet, B. A., Stephens, C. D., Power, J. D., Page, R. A. (1994), Earthquake 1 classification, location, and error analysis in a volcanic environment--Implications for the 2 magmatic system of the 1989-1990 eruptions at redoubt volcano, Alaska, Journal of 3 Volcanology and Geothermal Research 62 (1-4), 137-151. 4

Madariaga, R. (1976), Dynamics of an expanding circular fault, Bulletin of the 5 Seismological Society of America 66, 639-666. 6

McNutt, S. R. (2005), Volcano Seismology, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary 7 Sciences 33, 461-491. 8

Miller, A. D., Stewart, R. C., White, R. A., Luckett, R., Baptie, B. J., Aspinall, W. P., 9 Latchman, J. L., Lynch, L. L., Voight, B. (1998), Sesimicity associated with dome growth 10 and collapse at the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat, Geophysical Research Letters 25, 11 3401-3404. 12

Moran, S. C., Qamar, A. I., Buurman, H. M., (2005), Automated earthquake detection 13 during the 2004-2005 eruption of Mount St. Helens, EOS, Trans. AGU, 86(52), Fall 14 Meet. Suppl. Abstract V53D-1600. 15

Nakanishi, I. (1991), Source process of the 1989 Sanriku-Oki earthquake, Japan--source 16 function determined using empirical Green-function, J. Phys. Earth 39 (6), 661-667. 17

Neuberg, J. (2000), Characteristics and casuses of shallow seismicity in andesite 18 volcanoes, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-19 Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 358, 1533-1546. 20

Neuberg, J., Luckett, R., Baptie, B., Olsen, K., (2000), Models of tremor and low-21 frequency earthquake swarms on Montserrat, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal 22 Research 101, 83-104. 23

Neuberg, J. W., Tuffen, H., Collier, L., Green, D., Powell, T., Dingwell, D.J. (2006), The 24 trigger mechanism of low-frequency earthquakes on Montserrat, Journal of Volcanology 25 and Geothermal Research 153, 37-50. 26

Pallister, J. S., Hoblitt, R., Denlinger, R., Sherrod, D., Cashman, K., Thornber, C., Moran, 27 S. (2006), Structural Geology of the Mount St. Helens fault-gouge zone--field relations 28 along the volcanic Conduit wallrock interface, EOS, Trans.Am.geophys.Un.,Fall 29 MeetingSuppl., Abstract V41A-1703. 30

Venkataraman, A., Beroza, G. C., Ide S., Imanishi, K., Ito, H., Iio, Y. A.,(2006), 31 Measurements of spectral similarity for microearthquakes in wetern Nagano, Japan, J. 32 Geophys. Res.,111, B03303, doi:10.1029/2005JB003834. 33

34

35


Recommended