Vortices and vortex states of Rashba Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensatesspin-orbit coupled condensates
Predrag NikolićPredrag Nikolić
George Mason UniversityGeorge Mason University
Institute for Quantum Matter @ Johns Hopkins UniversityInstitute for Quantum Matter @ Johns Hopkins University
March 5, 2014March 5, 2014
P.N, T.Duric, Z.Tesanovic, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 176804 (2013)P.N, T.Duric, Z.Tesanovic, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 176804 (2013)
Support: NSF, DOESupport: NSF, DOE
• Introduction & motivation
• Vortex structures in Rashba S.O.C. condensates – Infinite 2D systems of bosons
(or many flux quanta in a trap)
– Excitations in uniform TR-invariant & TR-broken states – Vortex lattices
• Stability of vortex lattices: a microscopic model – Numerical mapping of the phase diagram (preliminary)
• Vortex unbinding T>0 transitions – New universality classes?
Overview
2/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
Introduction & motivation
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates 3/14
• Particles + static SU(2) gauge field in 2D
– Quantum spin-Hall effect (conserved S z)
.....
.....
– Rashba S.O.C. ⇒ Dirac spectrum (S z not conserved)
Yang-Mills flux matrix(“magnetic” for μ=0)
SU(2) generators(spin projection matrices)
Motivation
4/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Are there superfluids with a vortex lattice of spin currents? – by Rashba S.O.C. ⇔ “external” gauge field with flux
• Interesting because quantum vortex lattice melting in 2D: – preempts any 2nd order transition (by quantum Lindemann crit.) – can yield a topological vortex liquid with fractional excitations
– Rashba S.O.C. ⇒ naturally non-Abelian
• What if a 2D S.O.C. superfluid is uniform? – unconventional continuous transitions (not Kosterlitz-Thouless)
P.N, Phys.Rev.B87, 245120 (2013)
P.N, J.Phys: Cond.Mat.25, 025602 (2013).flux matrixLevi-Civita tensor anti-commutators
Type-I condensates
5/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Spin current without charge current
• Spin current densities & the Hamiltonian
Rashba S.O.C. ⇒
TR-invariant
Type-I vortices
6/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Conservation laws:
– no sources for , and
– vortex is source/drain
• Neutrality: vortex quadruplets – vortices carry two “charges”
– U(1) θ (anti)vortex is bound to ∇α vector (anti)vortex
Type-I vortex structures
7/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Non-neutral clusters • Domain wall
• Vortex lattice – unit cell is a quadruplet – square geometry
– α changes by nπ between singularities ⇒ rigid (meta)stable structure ⇒ one (n =1) vortex per SU(2) “flux quantum”
Type-II condensates
8/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Spin current by charge current + spin texture
• Current densities & the Hamiltonian
Rashba S.O.C. ⇒
– charge current + spin texture– TR broken
Type-II vortices
9/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Conservation laws:
• Vortex quadruplet – not classically (meta)stable – charge singularities bound to spin vortices (not antivortices)
– no sources for , and
– no sources for
Stability of vortex states
• Continuum: vortex cores are costly ⇒ uniform states
• Do vortex lattices ever win? – good candidates: metastable type-I structures – tight-binding lattice systems: vortex cores are cheap (if small) – entropy favors vortices (order by disorder, or vortex liquids)
• Microscopic lattice model – triplet pairing of fermions with Rashba S.O.C. on a square lattice bilayer (triplet superconductivity in a TI quantum well)
10/14Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
VL
PDW
Lattice model numerics
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Main competitors for the ground state: – pair density wave (PDW) states usually win, but found only when looked for! – SU(2) vortex lattices (type-I structures) always found in unconstrained minimization, sometimes win?
11/14
Similar to:
W.S.Cole, S.Zhang, A.Paramekanti, N. Trivedi,
PRL 109, 085302 (2012)
Vortex lattice wins?(tight S=1 Cooper pairs)
Competing orders
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Competition for 1% of free energy (F)
– PDW map (by ordering wavevectors):
commensurate pair density waves
vortex lattices
incommensurate plane waves
12/14
Vortex unbinding transitions at T>0
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Vortex quadruplets are ubiquitous – dipole unbinding: Kosterlitz-Thouless – new universality classes for quadruplets
• Coulomb gas renormalization group
non-KT
KT ?
KT
C0 – confined quadrupoles (low-T)
D1 – dipoles, confined Q, deconfined φ
D2 – dipoles, confined φ, deconfined Q
D0 – deconfined (vortex plasma, high-T)
KT:
non-KT:
13/14
OBSOLETE
Conclusions
• There are (meta)stable SU(2) vortex lattices – at least in tight-binding lattice models – non-Abelian fractional Tis by quantum melting of a vortex lattice
• Unconventional universality class for thermal unbinding of vortex quadruplets
• Elementary vortex excitations are quadruplets – vortices carry two kinds of charges
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates 14/14
Type-I vortices (S=1)
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Conservation laws:
– no sources for , and
– no sources for
• Upon coarse-graining (rapid α oscillations):
Vortex unbinding transitions at T>0
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Coulomb gas renormalization group
F, F' – integrals over relative positions of 4 vortices in a quadruplet (UV cut-off: vortex core size) IR-divergent as power-laws at partial unbinding transitions
y±
– vortex fugacity
K,K' – superfluid stiffness
Type-I condensates
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
• Uniform superfluid order parameter
• Spin current densities & the Hamiltonian
Rashba S.O.C. ⇒
• Perturb a QCP by the spin-orbit effect – New phases emerge due to relevant scales
• TI quantum well, or cold atoms – Finite-momentum triplet condensation is a “Zeeman effect”
– Vortex lattice of spin supercurrents shaped by the spin-orbit SU(2) flux
– Quantum vortex lattice melting ⇒ fractional TI?
• Strained graphene – Non-Abelian gauge fields by Kekule deformations?
Physical realizations?
Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates
P.N, T.Duric, Z.Tešanović,arXiv:1109.0017
P.N, Z.Tešanović,arXiv:1208.0608 & 1210.7821