+ All Categories
Home > Documents > VS PARKING SPACE · office parking Cities across the United States require a minimum amount of...

VS PARKING SPACE · office parking Cities across the United States require a minimum amount of...

Date post: 19-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
PARKING REQUIRED FOR A 100,000 FT² 4 FLOOR OFFICE BUILDING b MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED FOR OFFICES WITH REDUCTIONS IN CENTRAL DISTRICTS c downtown requirement no light grey = parking not required downtown zero in part of downtown 0 base requirement 1 rectangle ( ) = 10 spaces = 3250 ft² areas are proportional a 100,000 ft² parking office Cities across the United States require a minimum amount of parking to be built with nearly every office building. Constructing this parking is enormously expensive and often takes up more space than the building itself. Municipal parking mandates increase the cost of hiring employees because they raise the cost of each square foot of office space. Businesses are unable to save on parking costs by encouraging employees to carpool, ride transit, walk, or bike to work. Employees are not offered parking cash-out programs which reward workers who do not use parking with a portion of the savings. These graphs show the requirements for a typical office building in major cities across the United States. There is huge variation from city to city—ranging from zero to four hundred spaces for the same building. There seems to be little logic to these differences. (See El Paso vs. Albuquerque or Kansas City vs. Omaha) Which city is correct? Wouldn’t it be better to let businesses decide instead? Minimum parking requirements can lead to a massive oversupply of parking. This wastefulness hurts companies’ bottom lines and the economy at large. Cities often make exceptions or reductions in special zones, but why should offices have to be located downtown to choose to build less parking? People can carpool anywhere, and while transit and pedestrian infrastructure may be less developed in some places, it would be expanded if more people demanded it. That demand is artificially stunted so long as cities deny their citizens from reaping the full benefit of making more frugal choices. Charlotte Raleigh Washington, D.C. Baltimore Kansas City, MO Philadelphia+ Seattle Milwaukee Washington D.C. Chicago Minneapolis Pittsburgh Cleveland Denver San Francisco Portland, OR Los Angeles Boston El Paso Columbus Baltimore Orlando Colorado Springs Detroit Fort Worth New Orleans Sacramento Houston Louisville Tulsa Miami Jacksonville Dallas Oklahoma City* Tampa San Diego Raleigh Atlanta Las Vegas Memphis Tucson Charlotte Nashville Omaha San Antonio Phoenix* Indianapolis Austin Albuquerque* San Jose Philadelphia Boston Pittsburgh Columbus Cleveland Detroit Seattle Portland Sacramento Los Angeles Las Vegas Colorado Springs Kansas City, MO Memphis Nashville Louisville Indianapolis Chicago Milwaukee Omaha Minneapolis El Paso Albuquerque Tucson Phoenix Denver Tulsa Oklahoma City Dallas Fort Worth San Antonio Houston New Orleans Atlanta Miami Orlando Jacksonville Tampa Austin San Diego San Jose San Francisco parking area includes space between symbols a list of the pertinent sections of each city’s municipal code (with links) can be found at: graphingparking.com/sources calculations based on a general professional office building with four equal floors of 25,000 square feet each requirements are based on gross leasable area instead of gross square feet; these cities’ requirements may be somewhat overstated relative to others no requirements in any commercial zone a - b - c - * + UPDATED: 27 JUL 2013 PARKING SPACE VS parking required by city governments across the United States OFFICE SPACE 1000 FT² OFFICE SPACE 2.5 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING AISLES 812 FT² 40’-0’’ 9’-6’’ 14’-6’’ 8’-10’’ 8’-10’’ 26’-9’’ 18’-4’’ 12’-0’’ median requirement 25’-0’’ number of parking spaces 0 100 200 300 400 case by case 0 0 0 0 0
Transcript
Page 1: VS PARKING SPACE · office parking Cities across the United States require a minimum amount of parking to be built with nearly every office building. Constructing this parking is

PARKING REQUIREDFOR A 100,000 FT²

4 FLOOR OFFICE BUILDING

b

MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED FOR OFFICES WITH REDUCTIONS IN

CENTRAL DISTRICTSc

downtown requirementno light grey = parking not required downtown

zero in part of downtown0

base requirement

1 rectangle ( ) = 10 spaces = 3250 ft²

areas are propor tionala

100,000 ft² parkingoffice

Cities across the United States require a minimum amount of parking to be built with nearly every office building. Constructing this parking is enormously expensive and often takes up more space than the building itself. Municipal parking mandates increase the cost of hiring employees because they raise the cost of each square foot of office space. Businesses are unable to save on parking costs by encouraging employees to carpool, ride transit, walk, or bike to work. Employees are not offered parking cash-out programs which reward workers who do not use parking with a portion of the savings.

These graphs show the requirements for a typical office building in major cities across the United States. There is huge variation from city to city—ranging from zero to four hundred spaces for the same building. There seems to be little logic to these differences. (See El Paso vs. Albuquerque or Kansas City vs. Omaha) Which city is correct? Wouldn’t it be better to let businesses decide instead?

Minimum parking requirements can lead to a massive oversupply of parking. This wastefulness hurts companies’ bottom lines and the economy at large. Cities often make exceptions or reductions in special zones, but why should offices have to be located downtown to choose to build less parking? People can carpool anywhere, and while transit and pedestrian infrastructure may be less developed in some places, it would be expanded if more people demanded it. That demand is artificially stunted so long as cities deny their citizens from reaping the full benefit of making more frugal choices.

Charlotte

Raleigh

Washington, D.C .

Baltimore

Kans

as C

ity, M

O

Phila

delp

hia+

Seat

tleM

ilwau

kee

Was

hing

ton

D.C

.C

hica

goM

inne

apol

isPi

ttsb

urgh

Cle

vela

ndD

enve

r

San

Fran

cisc

o

Por t

land

, OR

Los A

ngel

esBo

ston

El P

aso

Col

umbu

sBa

ltim

ore

Orla

ndo

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Det

roit

For t

Wor

th

New

Orle

ans

Sacr

amen

toH

oust

onLo

uisv

ille

Tulsa

Mia

mi

Jack

sonv

ille

Dal

las

Okl

ahom

a C

ity*

Tam

paSa

n D

iego

Rale

igh

Atla

nta

Las V

egas

Mem

phis

Tucs

onC

har lo

tte

Nas

hvill

eO

mah

aSa

n A

nton

ioPh

oeni

x*In

dian

apol

isA

ustin

Alb

uque

rque

*Sa

n Jo

se

Philadelphia

Boston

Pittsburgh

Columbus

Cleveland

Detroit

Seattle

Por tland

Sacramento

Los AngelesLas Vegas

Colorado Springs Kansas City, MO

Memphis

Nashville

Louisville

Indianapolis

Chicago

Milwaukee

Omaha

Minneapolis

El Paso

Albuquerque

Tucson

Phoenix

Denver

Tulsa

Oklahoma City

DallasFor t Wor th

San Antonio HoustonNew Orleans

Atlanta

Miami

Orlando

Jacksonville

Tampa

Austin

San Diego

San Jose

SanFrancisco

parking area includes space between symbolsa list of the pertinent sections of each city’s municipal code (with links) can be found at: graphingparking.com/sourcescalculations based on a general professional office building with four equal floors of 25,000 square feet eachrequirements are based on gross leasable area instead of gross square feet; these cities’ requirements may be somewhat overstated relative to othersno requirements in any commercial zone

a -b - c -

*

+

UPDATED: 27 JUL 2013

PARKINGSPACE

VSparking required by city governments across the United States

OFFICESPACE

1000 FT² OFFICE SPACE 2.5 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING AISLES

812 FT²

40’-0

’’9’

-6’’

14’-6’’ 8’-10’’8’-10’’

26’-9’’

18’-

4’’

12’-

0’’

median requirement

25’-0’’

nu

mb

er

of

park

ing

spac

es

0

100

200

300

400

case

by

case

0 0 0 0 0

Recommended