W-CDMA for UMTS – PrinciplesW CDMA for UMTS Principles
IntroductionIntroductionCDMA BackgroundUMTS StandardizationK P t d D l i M dKey Parameter and Duplexing Modes
Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA)Why CDMA ?CDMA Principles / Spreading CodesMulti-path Radio Channel and Rake Receiver
Problems to SolveProblems to SolveMacro Diversity and Soft HandoverNear-Far Problem and Power Control
UMTS General RequirementsUMTS General RequirementsFDD vs. TDDSpectrum Allocation
Summary
References
H Holma A Toskala (Ed ) “WCDMA for UMTS” 4th edition Wiley 2007H. Holma, A. Toskala (Ed.), WCDMA for UMTS , 4th edition, Wiley, 2007.
T. Benkner, C. Stepping, UMTS – Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, J. Schelmbach Fachverlag, 2002.
A.J. Viterbi, “CDMA, Principles of Spread Spectrum Communication”, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
R L Peterson R E Ziemer D E Borth “Introduction to Spread SpectrumR.L. Peterson, R.E. Ziemer, D.E. Borth, Introduction to Spread Spectrum Communications”, Prencice-Hall, 1995.
T. Ojanperä, R. Prasad, “Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile C i i ” A h H 1998Communication”, Artech House, 1998.
R. Prasad, W. Mohr, W. Konhäuser, “Third Generation Mobile Communications Systems”, Artech House, March 2000.y , ,
UMTS Networks 2Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA History
Pioneer Era (Spread Spectrum)40s and 50s: Spread Spectrum technique for military anti-jam applications
1949: Claude Shannon and Robert Pierce develop basic ideas of CDMA1949: Claude Shannon and Robert Pierce develop basic ideas of CDMA
1970s: Several developments for military systems (e.g. GPS)
Narrow-band CDMA Era
1993: IS-95 standard (mainly driven by Qualcomm)
1992-1995: RACE project CODIT (UMTS Code Division Testbed, PKI, Ericsson, Telia, etc.)
Wide-band CDMA Era
1995-1999: ACTS project FRAMES: FMA Mode 1 TD/CDMA, FMA Mode 2 W-CDMA
1995 t d d 2000 1 / 3 (USA)1995-today: cdma2000 1x/ 3x (USA)
1998-today: UMTS (Rel.-99)
High-Speed CDMA Era
2000-today: HSDPA (Rel.-5/ 2000), E-DCH (Rel.-6/ 2002), HSPA+ (Rel.-7/ 2005)
cdma2000 1x EV-DO/DV
UMTS Networks 3Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
UMTS Standardization History
ETSI SMG2 air interface standardization for UMTS:ETSI SMG2 air interface standardization for UMTS:five groups evaluated competing concepts until end of 1997 (research was driven by FRAMES project)
No decision at SMG#24 on Dec 15 1997; result of the vote was 58 45% for W-CDMANo decision at SMG#24 on Dec 15, 1997; result of the vote was 58.45% for W-CDMA, 41.55% for TD-CDMA
Two proposals selected at SMG#24bis on Jan 28, 1998,W-CDMA (61 1%) and TD-CDMA (38 7%)W-CDMA (61.1%) and TD-CDMA (38.7%) consensus decision: W-CDMA for the paired frequency bands, TD-CDMA for the unpaired bands
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) formed Jan 1999 (ETSI ARIB T1P1 TTA3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) formed Jan 1999 (ETSI, ARIB, T1P1, TTA, …); CDMA proposals: W-CDMA in Europe & Japan (3GPP), and CDMA2000 in the US (3GPP2)
Pressure from ITU and operators to harmonize W-CDMA:Pressure from ITU and operators to harmonize W-CDMA:OHG (Operator Harmonisation Group) proposal accepted by 3GPP on July 6-7, 1999, i.e. CDMA standard with 3 modes (W-CDMA, TD-CDMA and multi-carrier CDMA); chip rate = 3.84Mcpsrate 3.84Mcps
In June 1999 work on narrowband TDD started (TD-SCDMA); main proponent: China; chip rate = 1.28Mcps
UMTS Networks 4Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
W-CDMA for UMTS – Summary of Key Parameters
Multiple-Access DS-CDMA (TD-CDMA) Duplex scheme FDD (TDD) Chip rate 3.84 MChip/s Carrier spacing Flexible in the range 4.6–5.0 MHz
(200 kHz carrier raster)( )Frequency bands 1920-1980 / 2110-2170 paired (FDD)
1900-1920 and 2010-2025 unpaired (TDD) Frame length 10 ms / (15 time slots)Frame length 10 ms / (15 time slots)Inter-BS synchronization
FDD mode: No accurate synchronization needed TDD mode: Synchronization needed
Multi rate/ Variable spreading factor + Multi codeMulti-rate/ Variable-rate scheme
Variable-spreading factor + Multi-codeSpreading factor: 4-256 (FDD) and 1-16 (TDD)
Channel coding Convolutional coding (rate 1/2–1/3)Channel coding scheme
Convolutional coding (rate 1/2–1/3)Turbo coding
UMTS Networks 5Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
FDD-Mode (WCDMA)
UMTS Networks 6Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
TDD-Mode (TD-CDMA)
UMTS Networks 7Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA Key Characteristics
Based upon spread spectrum technique developed for military anti-jam applications
Wide bandwidth needed to support high bit rates and to combat fading in pp g gmulti-path radio channels
Many users share the same RF carrier
E h i i d i d d diff t t d i t lEach user is assigned a unique random code different to and approximately orthogonal to other codes
Interference limited systems; quality degrades as number of users on a channel (carrier) increase
Spreading codes keep channels apart such that the same carrier can be used in the next cell (frequency re-use is 1)in the next cell (frequency re use is 1)
UMTS Networks 8Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA Multiple Access
CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access)all terminals send on the same frequency probably at the same time and can use the whole bandwidth of the transmission channel ca use t e o e ba d dt o t e t a s ss o c a eeach sender has a unique random number, the sender XORs the signal with this random numberthe receiver can “tune” into this signal if it knows the pseudo randomthe receiver can tune into this signal if it knows the pseudo random number, tuning is done via a correlation function
Advantages:Advantages: all terminals can use the same frequency, less planning neededhuge code space (e.g. 232) compared to frequency spaceinterference (e g white noise) is not codedinterference (e.g. white noise) is not codedforward error correction and encryption can be easily integrated
Disadvantages:Disadvantages:higher complexity of a receiver (receiver cannot just listen into the medium and start receiving if there is a signal)ll i l h ld h th t th t i ( t l)
UMTS Networks 9Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
all signals should have the same strength at a receiver (power control)
Spread spectrum technology:
Problem of radio transmission: frequency dependent fading can wipe out narrowProblem of radio transmission: frequency dependent fading can wipe out narrow band signals for duration of the interferenceSolution: spread the narrow band signal into a broad band signal using a special codecode
⇒ protection against narrow band interference
detection at
interferencespread signal
signal (despreaded)
spreadinterference
power power
Side effects:
detection atreceiver
interference
f f
coexistence of several signals without dynamic coordinationtap-proof
Alternatives: Direct Sequence (UMTS)F eq enc Hopping (slo FH GSM fast FH Bl etooth)
UMTS Networks 10Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Frequency Hopping (slow FH: GSM, fast FH: Bluetooth)
Effects of spreading and interference
Ψff
i) narrow band signal ii) spreaded signal (broadband signal)
Ψff
user signalbroadband interferencenarrowband interference
f f
sender
narrowband interference
iii) addition of interference
iv) despreadedsignal
v) application of bandpass filter
Ψff ΨffΨff
f f f
UMTS Networks 11Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
receiver
DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) I
XOR of the signal with pseudo random number (chipping sequence)XOR of the signal with pseudo-random number (chipping sequence)many chips per bit (e.g., 128) result in higher bandwidth of the signal
Advantagesreduces frequency selective fading
tbg
in cellular networks base stations can use the same frequency range
user data
0 1 XORtc
(data rate)
q y gseveral base stations can detect and recover the signalsoft handover
chipping sequence
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 01 0 0 1 11 =
c
(chip rate)
Disadvantagesprecise power control needed
resultingsignal
0 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 01 (chip rate)precise power control needed 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 01
tb: bit periodtc: chip period
( p )
UMTS Networks 12Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) II
user data
spreadspectrumsignal
transmitsignal
Xuser data
chippingsequence
modulator
radiocarrier
signal signal
sequence carrier
transmitter
receivedlowpassfiltered products
d t
sampledsums
correlator
demodulatorsignal
radio
X
chipping
signalintegrator decision
data
carrierpp g
sequence
receiver
UMTS Networks 13Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Digital modulation
Modulation of digital signals known as Shift KeyingModulation of digital signals known as Shift Keying
Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK):1 0 1
very simplelow bandwidth requirementsvery susceptible to interference
tvery susceptible to interference
Frequency Shift Keying (FSK):
1 0 1
Frequency Shift Keying (FSK):needs larger bandwidth t
Phase Shift Keying (PSK):more complex
1 0 1
more complexrobust against interference t
UMTS Networks 14Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Advanced Phase Shift Keying
BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying):bit value 0: sine wavebit l 1 i t d i
Q
bit value 1: inverted sine wavevery simple PSKlow spectral efficiency
I01
low spectral efficiencyrobust, used e.g. in satellite systems
QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying):Q (Q y g)
2 bits coded as one symbolsymbol determines shift of sine wave
Q 1110
needs less bandwidth compared to BPSKmore complex
d i UMTS d li k
I
0100used in UMTS downlinkPuls filtering of baseband to avoid sudden phase shifts
=> reduce bandwidth of modulated signal
0100
UMTS Networks 15Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
> reduce bandwidth of modulated signal
BPSK Spread Spectrum
For example:For example:
Data rate 240 kb/s
Spreading factor 16
Chip rate 3.84 Mchip/s
UMTS Networks 16Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
UMTS/DL uses QPSK, i.e. 2 bits per symbol (chip) UL: BPSK, i.e. 1 bit per symbol for BPSK
UMTS Spreading
chip rate: 3,84 Mcps (Mega chips per second)spreading factor (= ratio code rate/data rate) 4 - 512 => 15 - 1920 kbps
The spreading comprises two parts
channelisation codescrambling code Data (z.B. 960 kbps)scrambling code ( p )
Channelisation/spreading code
(3 8 )
- +
(data rate)
(3,84 Mcps)+ + ++- -- - + + ++- -- -
( hi t )
Scrambling code(PN sequence,
3,84 Mcps)
(chip rate)
Modulation(QPSK)
3,84 Mcps)
5 MHz spectrum
(chip rate)
UMTS Networks 17Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
(QPSK) spectrum
Functionality of channelization and scrambling codes
Channelization Code Scrambling CodeUsage UL: Separation of physical data
(DPDCH) and control channels UL: Separation of terminals
(DPCCH) from same terminalDL: Separation of DL connections to different users within one cell DL: Separation of sectors/cells
Length 4-256 chips (1.0-66.7 us) UL+DL: 10ms = 38400 chips
Number of codes Number of codes under 1 scrambling code = spreading
UL: several millionsDL: 256
factor (SF)
Code Family Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factor
Long 10 ms code: Gold code
Spreading Yes, increases transmission bandwidth
No, does not affect transmission bandwidth
UMTS Networks 18Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Properties of Spreading Sequences
C d #1
Auto correlation function (ACF)
Code sequence #1
Code sequence #2function (ACF) Code sequence #2
Required properties of spreading(properties of the transmitted signals):
Hi h ACF kCross correlation function (CCF)
• High ACF peak
• Low ACF sidelobe →inter-symbol interference (ISI)y ( )
• Low CCF →multi-user interference (MUI)
UMTS Networks 19Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Channelization Code: Orthogonal Code Tree
C d ti i i lCode generation principle:
X X
1111
11
11111111
11110000X X
X1100
11001100
1 11000011
X X
10
1010
1001100110100101
10101010
With interpretation x 1 x 11001
10010110
10011001
SF = 4
SF = 2With interpretation x = 1, x = -1,
these codes define „orthogonal“ channels!
I UMTS di f t (SF) f 4 512 (DL) / 4 256 (UL) d
SF = 8
In UMTS, spreading factors (SF) from 4 - 512 (DL) / 4-256 (UL) are used:
4 x SF4, 8 x SF8……………………256 x SF256, 512 x SF512
UMTS Networks 20Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Downlink Dedicated Channel Symbol and Bit Rates
Spreading factor
Channel symbol rate
Channel bit rate (kbps)
DPDCH channel bit
Maximum user data rate withfactor symbol rate
(kbps)rate (kbps) channel bit
rate range (kbps)
data rate with 1/2-rate coding
(approx.)
512 7.5 15 3-6 1-3 kbps
256 15 30 12-24 6-12 kbps
...
16 240 480 432 215 kbps8 480 960 912 456 kbps
4 960 1920 1872 936 kbps
4 with 3 2880 5760 5616 2 3 Mbps4, with 3 parallel codes
2880 5760 5616 2.3 Mbps
UMTS Networks 21Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA Principle (Downlink)
sender (base station) receiver (terminal)
Code 0 Code 0
Code 1
data 0
Code 1
data 0
Code 2
Σdata 1
Code 2
data 1Transmission overair interface
data 2 data 2
UMTS Networks 22Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA Principle (Uplink)
sender (terminal) receiver (base station)
Code 0 Code 0transmission overair interface
Code 1
data 0
Code 1
data 0
Code 2
Σdata 1
Code 2
data 1
Code 2
data 2 data 2
UMTS Networks 23Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA by example
S 1
data stream A & BCode 1
spreadingSource 1 spread
spreaded signalSource 1 Code 1 Source 1 spread
Source 2 Code 2 Source 2 spread
UMTS Networks 24Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA by example
Despread Source 1
Sum of Sources Spread Sum of Sources Spread + Noise
decoding and
+Despread Source 2
and despreading
overlay of signals transmission and y gdistortion (noise and interference)
UMTS Networks 25Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA in theory
Sender A
sends Ad = 1, key Ak = 010011 (assign: „0“= -1, „1“= +1)
sending signal A = Ad * Ak = (-1 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1)sending signal As Ad Ak ( 1, +1, 1, 1, +1, +1)
Sender B
sends Bd = 0, key Bk = 110101 (assign: „0“= -1, „1“= +1)
sending signal Bs = Bd * Bk = (-1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1)
Both signals superimpose in space
interference neglected (noise etc )interference neglected (noise etc.)
As + Bs = (-2, 0, 0, -2, +2, 0)
Receiver wants to receive signal from sender Ag
apply key Ak bitwise (inner product)
Ae = (-2, 0, 0, -2, +2, 0) • Ak = 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 2 + 0 = 6
l h h f l b “result greater than 0, therefore, original bit was „1“
receiving B
Be = (-2, 0, 0, -2, +2, 0) • Bk = -2 + 0 + 0 - 2 - 2 + 0 = -6, i.e. „0“
UMTS Networks 26Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Be ( 2, 0, 0, 2, +2, 0) • Bk 2 + 0 + 0 2 2 + 0 6, i.e. „0
CDMA on signal level I
data A1 0 1 Ad
key A
keysequence A 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 Ak
i l A
data ⊕ keysequence A
01 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Assignal A As
Real systems use much longer keys resulting in a larger distance between single code words in code spacebetween single code words in code space
UMTS Networks 27Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA on signal level II
signal A As
data B 1 0 0 Bd
key Bkey
sequence B00 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Bksequence B
data ⊕ key11 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
Bssignal B s
10
As + Bs
0-1
UMTS Networks 28Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA on signal level III
data A1 0 1 Ad
1As + Bs
10-1
Ak
1
1
(As + Bs) 10
-1
* Ak
integrator
-1
output
comparatoroutput
1 0 1
UMTS Networks 29Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA on signal level IV
data B1 0 0 Bd
1As + Bs
10-1
Bk
1
1
(As + Bs) * B
-110
integrator
* Bk -1
output
comparatoroutput
1 0 0
UMTS Networks 30Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
CDMA on signal level V
1As + Bs
10-1
wrongkey K
1
(As + Bs)
-1
10* K 0-1
comparator
integratoroutput
comparatoroutput (0) (0) ?
Assumptionsth lit f k
UMTS Networks 31Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
orthogonality of keysneglectance of noiseno differences in signal level => precise power control
Mobile Radio Channel (wrap-up)
UMTS Networks 32Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Channel Impulse Response
l h d f h lMulti-path components cause time dispersion of the signalTime dispersion is measured by delay spread σ
Channel impulse response (CIR)
|CIR| Typical (mean) delay spread σ:example|CIR| yp ( ) y p
• macro-cells 5 μs• micro-cells 1 μs• pico cells 500 ns
example of impulse response
• pico-cells 500 ns• indoor 100 ns
approximation(neg. exponential)
τ
Exponentially decaying channel impulse response:f
σ
UMTS Networks 33Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
a level of -30dB is reached at τ = 7σ
Multi-path Transmission
Multi-path components can be resolved due to ACF of codes
DespreaderSpreader (Correlator)
SpreadingSequence c(t)
SpreadingSequence c(t-Td)
Receiver synchronizes tosynchronizes to each multi-path component for de-spreading
UMTS Networks 34Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Rake Receiver
Correlate and track each multi-path component separately
Rake receiver with K fingers
• trackers: independent tracking
of dominant pathsof dominant paths
• searchers: scan a time window to
search (the pilot channel) for ( p )
dominant multi-path components
• time resolution in UMTS approx.
200 ns
Optimal coherent combining
UMTS Networks 35Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Optimal coherent combining
Macro-Diversity & Soft Handover
NodeB 1NodeB 1NodeB 2NodeB 2
UEUE
Optimal coherent combiningOptimal coherent combiningin the RAKE receiver (at MS)in the RAKE receiver (at MS)
UMTS Networks 36Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
( )( )
Multi-user CDMA
Conventional CDMA Receiver (Base Station):
Despreader(Correlator) • coherent (amplitude and phase) RF
demodulation at base stationdemodulation at base station• separate despreading and demodulation of
each signal at base stationR k i ith K fi i l
SpreadingSequence c1(t-Td1)
SpreadingSequence c2(t-Td2)
• one Rake receiver with K fingers per signal• unsynchronized transmission between the
mobiles
SpreadingS (t T )Sequence cn(t-Tdn)
UMTS Networks 37Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Near-Far Problem - Power Control
Near-Far Problem:• Spreading sequences are not orthogonal
(multi-user interference)• Near mobile dominate• Signal to interference ratio is lower for far
UE 1UE 1
gmobiles and performance degrades
The problem can be resolved through dynamicThe problem can be resolved through dynamic power control to equalize all received power levels
AND/OR: by means of joint multi-user detection
NodeBNodeB
AND/OR: by means of joint multi-user detection
UE 2UE 2
UMTS Networks 38Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Interference Cancellation
Multi-user Interference Cancellation (Joint Detection):
Matched Filter toSequence c1(t)
MF
Detection mechanism takes into account interference f th ll i l
Matched Filter toSequence c2(t)
MF1
Multi-userDetector
(J i t from other users as all signalsare known in the receiver(intra-cell interference can becanceled)
q ( )
Matched Filter to
MF2
(Joint Detection
Interference Cancellation)
canceled)Matched Filter toSequence cn(t)
MFn
UMTS Networks 39Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
FDD vs. TDD Mode
UMTS supports FDD and TDD
FDD mode:FDD mode:- Multiple access scheme: DS-CDMA (Direct Sequence-CDMA)- Symmetric capacity of up- and down-link- Better suited for low bit rate transmission in larger cells
(no timing advance, no synchronization from MS required)
TDD mode:- Multiple access scheme: TD-CDMA (JD-CDMA)- Asymmetric capacity allocation for up- and down-link- Strict synchronization required for MS (timing advance)- Relaxed power control and near-far resistance by the use
of intra-cell multi-user interference cancellation (spreading factor 1 - 16)
UMTS Networks 40Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
TDD Mode (TD-CDMA)
• TDD: each time frame contains at least one time slot for the uplink and one time slot for the downlink
• Only spreading factors between 1 and 16 are used resulting in the same transmission rates as in FDDsame transmission rates as in FDD
• As in FDD, FDMA can be used if a Network operator provides of further , p pfrequency channels
S it hi i t ld b ft h ti l t thi ld l i i i• Switching points could be after each time slot, this would also minimize transmission delay, puts however high demands on hardware in NodeB and UE.
UMTS Networks 41Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
TDD-Mode (TD-CDMA) Summary
UMTS Networks 42Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
TDD Mode Switching
multiple switching points, symmetric DL/UL allocation
multiple switching points, asymmetric DL/UL allocationp g p , y
single switching point, symmetric DL/UL allocation
single switching point, asymmetric DL / UL allocation
1 Frame (10ms) of 15 Slots
UMTS Networks 43Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
1 Frame (10ms) of 15 Slots
Global Spectrum Allocations for IMT-2000
IMT-2000ITU
2010 20251980MSS MSS*
1930
IMT-2000 MSSMSS*IMT 2000
2160 2170 2200 MHz
*Region2
1885 2110
IMT-2000 MSSDECT MSSIMT-2000Europe
PHS
20101980 2025Japan
2110 22002170
IMT-2000 MSSMSSIMT-2000
18951885 1918 1
1980 2110 2200217019001880 2010 2025 MHz
Europe
20101980 2025 2110 2200217018951885 1918.1 MHz
20101980 2025
China2110 22002170
MSSMSS
1900 1920 MHz1865 1880 1945 1960
CDMA FDD-WLL
FDD-WLLCDMA
TDD-WLL
2110 220021652150
Reserve MSSBroadcast Auxilary
1910 1930 1990 2025
MSS
1850
PCS*PCSA B CD E F
PCSA B CD E F
MHz
USAMHz
UMTS Networks 44Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
MSS: Mobile Satellite Services
UMTS Spectrum
2200
2000
2100
1900
Up-link Down-linkM
Hz
MH
z
MH
z
MH
z
U i d B d 20 15MH (1900 1920 d 2010 2025MH ) f TDDUnpaired Band: 20 + 15MHz (1900-1920 and 2010-2025MHz) for TDD
Paired Band: 2 x 60MHz (1920-1980 and 2110-2170MHz) for FDD
Uplink Downlink
Details:
1 2 3 11 12. . .
1920 MHz 1980 MHz
1 2 3 11 12. . .
2110 MHz 2170 MHzp
5 MHz
UMTS Networks 45Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008
Satellite Band: 2 x 30MHz (1980-2010 and 2170-2200MHz)
Spectrum per Operator
GSM Operator UMTS Operator 1 UMTS Operator 2
Micro Layer Macro Layer
5 MHz5 MHz4 4 MHz3 MHz 5 MHz5 MHz4.4 MHz3 MHz
2.7+4.4+5.0+2.5 = 14.6 MHz
• Frequency reuse 1, i.e. typically 1 macro layer frequency band• No frequency planning• Border problems are to be solved
UMTS Networks 46Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Oct. 2008