THE EFEECTIVENESS OF THE RIVER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE LOWER TONE RIVER
Naoki IWAYA, Shoji FUKUOKA and Hidenori ZENIYA
In the Lower Tone River, channel dredging and widening have been conducted to respond to the large floods. However, the current river channel has still insufficient capacity for the present design flood. So, it is required the appropriate river improvement works in the future, and therefore it is important to clarify the changes in cross-sections and effectiveness of the past river improvement works. We investigated changes in the characteristics of channel shape resulting from the channel widening by using non-dimensional plan shape parameters. The result provided that there was little difference of characteristics of plan shape between the natural meandering channel and the Lower Tone River after river improvement works in spite of conducting the channel widening. Furthermore, we suggested the effectiveness of the river improvement works in the Lower Tone River by using Fukuoka’s equation.
Key Words : the Lower Tone River, river improvement works, channel widening and dredging, flood flow, channel shape, Fukuoka’s equation
1)
(85.5km 66.5km)56 58 5
56 582)
3)
4)
.
- 171 -
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0
-9
-7
-5
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0
(85.3km)
(16.7km) (31.2km) (40.1km)
(44.5km)
(54.7km)
(58.3km)
(66.4km)
(76.5km)
(78.5km)
(m)
S36 H19
S36 S47 S55 H07 H17
(km)
(Y.P
.m)
(km)
S34.8 6300m3/sS47.9 5800m3/sS47.9
S57.9 7800m3/sH10.9 8600m3/sH19.9 7200m3/s
S36 S47 S55 H10 H19
-11.0 -9.9 -8.8 -7.8 -6.7 -5.6 -4.5 -3.5 -2.4 -1.3 -0.2 0.8 1.9 3.0(Y.P.m)
Flow
Flow
(85.5km)(40.0km)
(18.5km)
78.5km 66.4km54.7km
44.5km 40.1km
31.2km
76.5km16.7km
(0.0km)
(S55 S58)(S36 S39)
Flow
- 172 -
85.5km 0.0km36 19
47 9 10 934 8 57
9
36 1919
3)
Sine-generated curvebmc
Amp L 2Amp/Lbmc/(2Amp+bmc)
bmc/L2Amp/L bmc/(2Amp+bmc)36 19
bmc/L bmc/Lbmc/L 0.03
0.06 bmc/(2Amp+bmc) 0.53
69.0km 62km43.0km 33.5km 38.5km 26km
bmc/(2Amp+bmc) 2Amp/L
bmc/(2Amp+bmc)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Lbmc
� �mcmp
mcbA
b�2/
/L
Amp2
/
L
2Amp+bmc
bmc
Sine-generated curve
2 2Amp
80.0km 69.0km69.0km 62.0km66.0km 58.0km62.0km 52.5km47.5km 38.5km43.0km 33.5km38.5km 26.0km
S36 H19
0.020.04
0.060.08
02000400060008000
1000012000
S34 S36 S38 S40 S42 S44 S46 S48 S50 S52 S54 S56 S58 S60 S62 H01H03H05H07H09H11H13H15H17H19
S34.8 S47.9
S57.9
H10.9
H19.9
(85.3km)
(76.5km)
- 173 -
55
34 8 479 57 9 10 9
(1) (2)4)
Q B h I
dr =d60 g
18.5km
85.3km 66.4km
85.3km76.5km
810
710
610
510
410
310 1410 1510
rdB
rdh
5rgId
Q
40.0
580.2 �
�
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dB
40.0
533.6
��
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dB
40.0
525.4
��
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dB
85.3km78.5km76.5km66.4km
54.7km44.5km
40.1km31.2km16.7km
16.7km (S36 )
38.0
514.0
��
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dh
38.0
513.0
��
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dh
40.0
5
40.0
533.680.2 �
�
�
�
��
���
�
�
�
��
rrr gId
QdB
gId
Q38.0
514.0
��
�
�
��
�
rr gIdQ
dh
- 174 -
41 5)
10
77.0km 76.0km22
76.5km76.5km
76.2km
76.5km
76.5km 76.0km
18.5km 3622
1200m
16.7km
36
11
36
18.5km
76.0k
76.1k
76.2k
76.3k
76.5k
76.6k
76.7k
76.8k
76.9k
77.0k
Flow
76.4k
- 175 -
19 9
1)
2)
3)
10
1)
B1
Vol.69 No.4 I_1003-1008 2013
2)
B1 Vol.68 No.4 I_1135-1140 2012
3)
No.754/ -66 pp.19-
31 2004
4)
B1
Vol.68 No.4 I_1423-1428 2012
5) 1987
- 176 -