WA Horticultural Update 2018Dr David McKinna & Catherine Wall
August 2018
Presentation
1. The emerging export opportunity
2. The need for premiumisation
3. Opportunistic trading versus programmed marketing
4. The power of collaboration
5. Case studies
6. Critical success factors
The emerging export opportunity
4
• Total value growing strongly driven by green vegetables.
• Total volume flat due to declining potatoes and onions.
• Middle East and SE Asia are the dominant market regions.
VALUE VOLUME
Exports $248 million 197,811 tonnes
Growth trend 4.8% 5.7%
5 year CAGR 10.8% 4.4%
2017/18 vegetable exports
Current export performance
5
Source: ABS via Global Trade Atlas, Fresh Intelligence Analysis
0
50
100
150
200
250
300M
illio
n A
UD
pe
r ye
ar
All vegetables 20 year export (value)MAT Period - April 17 to March 18
Other fresh vegetables
Capsicum
Tomatoes
Pumpkins & squash
Cabbage & kale
Celery
Fresh beans
Lettuce
Broccoli
Onions
Potatoes
Asparagus
Carrots
Export growth drivers
6
1. Growing economic prosperity and modern trade in target markets
2. Australia’s reputation for safe food and trading integrity
3. Location and freight connectivity
4. Favourable $A exchange rate
5. FTAs and improved market access
6. Strategic investment in exporting by category leaders
7. Implementation of AUSVEG export strategy and improved industry culture
8. Strong and growing trading relationships in Asia and Middle East
Benefits of exporting
7
1. Potential for higher returns
2. Domestic market price impacts
3. Market diversification
4. Business resilience
Risks of exporting
8
1. Market risk
2. Commercial risk
3. Freight connectivity risk
4. Exchange rate volatility
The need for ‘premiumisation’
Australian horticulture is not price competitive in commodity markets
10
1. Higher cost of labour
2. Higher cost of inputs
3. Distance and logistics
4. Cost of compliance (although also a competitive advantage)
1. Focus on premium market segments
2. Transition from ‘opportunistic trading’ to ‘programmed marketing’
3. Build a value proposition based around differentiated products
So, what do we need to do?
Australian exporters must target high end, modern trade channels
12
High end retail High end food service
Premiumisation approaches
13
1. Superiour variety/genetics
2. Product size/shape/maturity/colour
3. Trim, wash and preparation
4. Value-adding
5. Quality standard/consistency
6. Packaging
7. Branding and provenance
8. Supply chain efficiency
9. Service levels
Opportunistic trading versus programmed marketing
15
Opportunistic trading: Programmed marketing:
Reactive to enquiries and orders Proactive – planned, scheduled supply
Highly volatile trade Stable trade
Short term, deal-by-deal negotiation Agreed pricing formula
Price driven Ability to build brand loyalty
Tends to be agent drivenRequires critical mass and supply continuity - suits collaborative model
Orders consolidated from central markets Product tailored to export market
No commitments, but no loyalty Mutual obligation and loyalty
The power of collaboration
Advantages of collaboration
17
1. Allows smaller businesses to sustainably export
2. Provides access to markets and customers
3. Closed-loop supply chains improve returns
4. Improves market power
5. Optimises freight and logistics
6. Embeds quality and compliance systems/processes
7. Supports skilled, professional management
8. Provides the critical mass required for brand-based marketing
9. Enables access to better market intelligence
10. Mitigates or better manages risks of exporting
3 levels of collaboration
18
Communication Coordination Collaboration
• Informal information sharing
• Risk/reward held with individuals
• Highly flexible
• Formal relationships
• Pooled collective resources
• Shared goals
• Commitment and accountability
• Shared risk and reward
• More structured systems
• Closer relationships
• Sharing of resources
• Business cooperation on marketing
Example: Taking a stand at the AUSVEG trade events and sharing networks
Example: A broccoli exporter coordinating supply from counter-seasonal contract growers in other states under a common pack
Example: JV between a group of companies to collectively market all their produce
Collaborative models
19
1. Regional collaborations with single category
2. Regional collaborations with complementary categories
3. Multi-regions with single category
Entity structures
20
1. Partnerships
2. Corporations
3. Cooperatives
4. Joint ventures
5. Licensing agreements
6. Codes of practice
Governance structures
1. Mission/vision/goals
2. Business strategy
3. Terms of employment
4. Board charter and risk appetite statement
5. Shareholding structure
6. Funding model
7. Profit distribution policy
8. Operational policy
Case studies
Summer CitrusSouth Africa
22
• Over 250 citrus growers from Western Cape
• Formed an alliance in 1999 to coordinate shipping to the USA
• The central entity manages logistics and provenance marketing only
• The organisation is a critical contact point for coordination of the US citrus counter season
23
Structure & Governance
• ‘Not for profit’ company • Limited by guarantee• Does not issue dividends• Board of 8 directors and CEO• Seasonal contract staff• Hold weekly board meetings during the season
Business model
1. Logistics services: • Negotiates shipping rates• Export documentation• Engages a ‘grower rep’ at port in USA
2. Marketing:• Provenance marketing only• Growers retain own brands• Growers continue to manage their own sales and marketing
24
Benefits
• Lower shipping costs• Improved coordination of logistics• Strong ‘country of origin’ messaging• Improved returns with independence retained
Risks
Growers leave the group and economies of scale are lost
Summer Citrus:Harvest of Hope
25
Summer Citrus participate in Harvest of Hope - a charity to improve economic situation of 30,000 citrus workers including:
• Skill development
• Education and training
• Childcare
• Leisure time development
• Healthcare
Summer Citrus: Learnings
26
1. Pre-season planning brings all partners in the supply chain into the discussion – including US importers and retailers
2. The group attempted a marketing relationship with a US retailer. After this failed it was agreed to keep sales functions separate.
3. Recognition that a ‘whole of industry’ approach was needed to compete against South Americans
4. Leveraging Harvest of Hope program as a point of difference in marketing
5. Summer Citrus cannot act independently of growers
“Our annual planning meeting is a vital part of our company’s success and offers the opportunity to bring all of our partners together before our first vessel arrives in the U.S. in June,”
Suhanra Conradie, CEO,
Summer Citrus
Summer Citrus: Applications in WA
27
1. Ideal for single category industry importing large volumes into one market
2. Potential categories: Apples, Carrots, potatoes, onions, melons
3. Ideal for building country-of-origin or regional endorsement brands
AvocoNew Zealand
28
1. Conducts the planning, shipping, logistics, forex management, marketing for 800 NZ growers
2. Formed in 2013 expressly for export collaboration to reduce competition into Australia – no domestic sales
3. 80% of fruit is marketed to Australia
4. Exports branded under ‘Avanza’
5. Historically, have achieved much higher returns to growers
Avoco
29
Structure & Governance
• A 50:50 partnership between two leading packing/marketing businesses (Primor & Southern Produce)
• Four board members including 2 CEOs of the partner businesses• 10 member grower representative group from across regions – meets 4
times p.a. • Annual planning conference
Business model
• Sells to wholesalers and retailers in all export markets• Separates contracts for Coles & Woolworths• Gross returns (after shipping cost) are pooled by grade and distributed
to the pack houses less Avoco 10% fee.• Pack houses pay growers on pooled return, less packing fee.
Avoco
30
Benefits
• Scale and market power supplying 75% of Australian exports• Australian buyers unable to play one supplier off against the other• Market information and feedback is delivered back to the growers• Growers benefit from Avoco’s investment in market development• Collaboration on technical issues and industry networking• Excellent returns to growers
Risks
• Loss of supply if growers leave the arrangement• Dispute between the two principal partners resulting in reversion to
competitive market
Avoco:Learnings
31
1. The two CEOs from the principal companies have a great working relationship
2. Grower representative board provides shared vision and open communication
3. Gives small growers access to highly professional and experienced sales, marketing and logistics personnel
4. Growers share equally in the gains
5. There is an understanding about “Better results through working together”
AvocoApplications in WA
32
1. Suited to a single commodity selling into the same markets
2. Works well to improve returns where two or three dominant marketers compete against each other
3. Suits categories with high volume seasonal windows
G’s GrowersUnited Kingdom
33
1. A collective of 19 growers trading as a ‘not for profit’ EU ‘Producer Organisation’ (like our cooperative)
2. G’s Growers has a strategic alliance with a privately-owned, exclusive marketer (G’s Fresh)
3. G’s Growers produce a range of complementary vegetables under long term supply contracts
34
Structure & Governance
• A board of directors is selected from grower members• Staff includes CEO, procurement, logistics and technical team• The family who manage the marketing through G’s Fresh are also
members of G’s Growers• Growers share expertise and experience
Business model
• G’s Fresh markets the produce on behalf of G’s Growers for a set 6% fee
• G’s Growers pools all returns by category (from all markets) then pays growers net of commission, packing and handling costs
• Much of the product is sold in retailer home brand – G’s Fresh have their own brands
• Growers commit 100% of their production to the group (with exceptions)
• The alliance has the scale to supply large supermarket home brand contracts
• Service UK, EU (10%) and US markets
35
Benefits
• Most of the 19 businesses have grown significantly since the alliance began
• The group is tightly knit and there have been few new members• The main benefit to all is the ability to achieve scale• G’s Fresh are experienced marketers and conduct market research• G’s Growers buy in-puts collectively – labour recruitment is done
centrally by G’s Fresh• G’s Fresh also assists in managing working capital requirements for
growers
Risks
• Loss of member growers• Adding new growers that do not fit the culture or product mix (an organic
grower did not work)
G’s Growers:Learnings
36
1. Leadership from the marketing entity G’s Fresh
2. Transparency, accuracy and trust in G’s Fresh
3. Flexibility in applying the rules (e.g. some growers do not buy inputs through the group)
G’s GrowersLearnings for WA
37
1. This model works well for marketers of complementary products e.g.
• Hard vegetables
• Green vegetables
• Citrus
2. The model is not dependent on being a cooperative structure as could be applied to a single company or alliance
Avalon GrowersUnited Kingdom
38
• Avalon Growers is a grower-owned ‘Producer Organisation’ representing 22 pome fruit growers
• Operates a collective, highly efficient, large scale pack house
• Provides advisory support and services to its members
• Collectively purchase inputs and insurance
• Owns 50% of exclusive marketing company ‘Avalon Produce’
• Turns over 20,000 tonnes of fruit and sales of circa 15 million UK pounds
39
Structure & Governance
• Avalon Growers owns 50% of Avalon Produce (marketing organisation) in partnership with a very large grower/marketer
• Avalon Growers is capitalised through grower loans which are repayable on exiting the arrangement
• The board has 5 directors – 4 growers and 1 packer (chair)
• There are common directors on Avalon Produce board
• The ‘PO’ status entitles the organisation to annual grants
• Underwritten by grower loans
Business model
• 3 income sources:
1. Bin rental
2. Fees for advisory services
3. Grant income
• Any profits are re-invested
• Avalon Produce markets the fruit for a 6% percentage fee
• Profits are pooled to growers
• Growers also receive a rebate on their 50% share of the marketing company
• All administration is outsourced to keep operational overheads to a minimum
• Supply several major UK retailers
40
Benefits
• Shared pack house facility ensures scale and efficiency• Collectively growers are able to service contracts like Tesco• The cross-ownership of the marketing company ensures supply loyalty
and provides a rebate
• The rule where only 10% of a grower’s fruit can be sold outside the system also locks in supply
Risks
• Removal of the PO grant opportunities when Britain exists EU• A break up of Avalon Growers (unlikely given the superior returns
and rebate)
Avalon Growerslearnings
41
1. Strong support for growers with buying discounts, rebates and advisory services
2. A financial commitment to participate - growers received matched funding to buy the assets and have a covenant over them until they are paid down
3. The group are able to access professional marketing services and lock in contracted supply to large retailers like Tesco
Avalon GrowersApplications for WA
42
1. A separate, jointly-funded marketing arm removes the historically adversarial nature of this relationship and ensures transparency.
2. The commonly owned pack house model works well where there are economies of scale to be gained from investment in high tech facilities e.g. potatoes, onions, apples, etc.
Critical success factors
Common success factors
44
1. Being customer and market led
2. A compelling value proposition for all collaborating parties
3. Having the appropriate business model for their size and needs
4. An appropriate balance of sharing risks and rewards
5. Open and transparent communication
6. Brand-based marketing programs
7. Separation of growing and marketing functions
The key to successful collaboration is an understanding of the greater opportunity, a shared goal, mutual interest and a willingness to commit.
WA Horticultural Update 2018Dr David McKinna & Catherine Wall
August 2018