+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Walters Gardens TotalGrow Testing Report 140514

Walters Gardens TotalGrow Testing Report 140514

Date post: 07-Oct-2015
Category:
Upload: henry-gordon-smith
View: 9 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
LED Case Study
7
 Walters Gardens TotalGrow Light Testing Test Summary: The potential for a 2/3 power consumption reduction by replacing 1000W high pressure sodium lights with 150W TotalGrow TG15A lights was tested and proven by comparing growth characteristics of  several Walters Gardens perennials. Eight characteristics were measured on 11 varieties of  plants in 2 growth stages using 3 light intensities representing lesser, equivalent and greater than current Walters Gardens lighting levels. Plants tested:  Monarda ‘Leading Lady Plum’ (show and production, 3 light intensities)  Echinacea Julia (show, 3 intensities)  Heucherella (show, 3 intensities)  Agave QWT (production, 3 intensities)  Carex Banana Boat (production, 3 intensities)  Coreopsis Moonbeam (production, 3 intensities)  Coreopsis Zagreb (production, 3 intensities   lost from inadequate watering)  Dianthus Fire Star (production, 3 intensities)  Geranium Rozanne (production, medium intensity)  Echinacea ‘Kims Knee High’ (production, medium intensity)  Hakonechloa Aureola (production, medium intensity) Growth Data Collected:  Height (all 10 varieties)  Diameter (6 varieties)  Largest leaf  length & width (7 varieties)  Branching (Monarda)  Total shoots (6 varieties)  Leaf  Count (6 varieties)  Root Score (all 10 varieties) Results Summary: The TotalGrow lighting strategy tested requires only one third of  the power consumption of  the 1000W HPS lighting system while consistently yielding statistically equal growth. Most variation in the data is better attributed to uncontrolled variables than to the lighting, especially differing soil moisture levels due to varying amounts of  airflow and occasionally inconsistent watering. When combining data from all varieties, all traits were within one standard deviation of  difference between lighting types with only height and branching differing by more than 0.5 standard deviations (greater in TG due to greater Monarda show plant sizes). Average light intensities were targeted at 25% higher under HPS to test the ability of  the TotalGrow spectrum to be equally effective at a lower light intensity. Average light 
Transcript
  • WaltersGardensTotalGrowLightTesting

    TestSummary:

    Thepotentialfora2/3powerconsumptionreductionbyreplacing1000Whighpressuresodiumlightswith150WTotalGrowTG15AlightswastestedandprovenbycomparinggrowthcharacteristicsofseveralWaltersGardensperennials.Eightcharacteristicsweremeasuredon11varietiesofplantsin2growthstagesusing3lightintensitiesrepresentinglesser,equivalentandgreaterthancurrentWaltersGardenslightinglevels.

    Plantstested:

    MonardaLeadingLadyPlum(showandproduction,3lightintensities) EchinaceaJulia(show,3intensities) Heucherella(show,3intensities) AgaveQWT(production,3intensities) CarexBananaBoat(production,3intensities) CoreopsisMoonbeam(production,3intensities) CoreopsisZagreb(production,3intensitieslostfrominadequatewatering) DianthusFireStar(production,3intensities) GeraniumRozanne(production,mediumintensity) EchinaceaKimsKneeHigh(production,mediumintensity) HakonechloaAureola(production,mediumintensity)

    GrowthDataCollected:

    Height(all10varieties) Diameter(6varieties) Largestleaflength&width(7varieties) Branching(Monarda) Totalshoots(6varieties) LeafCount(6varieties) RootScore(all10varieties)

    ResultsSummary:

    TheTotalGrowlightingstrategytestedrequiresonlyonethirdofthepowerconsumptionofthe1000WHPSlightingsystemwhileconsistentlyyieldingstatisticallyequalgrowth.Mostvariationinthedataisbetterattributedtouncontrolledvariablesthantothelighting,especiallydifferingsoilmoisturelevelsduetovaryingamountsofairflowandoccasionallyinconsistentwatering.Whencombiningdatafromallvarieties,alltraitswerewithinonestandarddeviationofdifferencebetweenlightingtypeswithonlyheightandbranchingdifferingbymorethan0.5standarddeviations(greaterinTGduetogreaterMonardashowplantsizes).Averagelightintensitiesweretargetedat25%higherunderHPStotesttheabilityoftheTotalGrowspectrumtobeequallyeffectiveatalowerlightintensity.Averagelight

  • intensities,measuredinmole*m2*s1PAR,were21%higherunderHPSareasthanTotalGrowareaswhenmeasuredwithanOceanOpticsUSB2000spectrometerandamobileintegratingsphere.Rootgrowthandqualityappearedtobethecharacteristicmoststronglycorrelatedwithlightintensity,showingimprovementathigherintensitiesregardlessoflightingtype.

    Resultsindetail:

    Evaluatingeachdatacategorybynumberoftrialswithgreatervaluesfromeachlightingtypeandaveragemagnitudeofvariation,measuredbystandarddeviations(SDs):

    HeightTGgreaterin16/29trials(.6SDs)o GreatestforTGinMonardaandHeucherellashowplantsandAgaveandGeranium

    productionplants,greatestforHPSinCoreopsisMoonbeamandDianthus DiameterTGgreaterin9/19trials(.1SDs)

    o GreatestforTGinMonarda,EchinaceaandHeucherellashowplants,greatestforHPSinDianthus

    LargestleaflengthandwidthTGgreaterin10/18trials(.2SDs)o GreatestforTGinMonardaandHeucherellashowplants,allothersverysimilar

    MainBranches(Monardashowplantsonly)TGgreaterin2/3trials(.9SDs) TotalShootsHPSgreaterin13/20trials(.3SDs)

    o GreatestforHPSinMonardaproductionplantsandCarex LeafCountHPSgreaterin12/17trials(.1SDs)

    o GreatestforTGinMonardashowplants,greatestforHPSinMonardaproductionplantsandEchinaceaKimsKneeHigh

    RootScoreHPSgreaterin16/29trials(.3SDs)o GreatestforHPSinCarex,CoreopsisMoonbeamandEchinaceaKimsKneeHigh,all

    othersverysimilar

    Foreachcharacteristic,therewasanear5050splitoftrialswithgreaterresultsbetweenthetwolightingtypes.Combinedwiththesmallmagnitudeoftheaveragevariationsbetweentreatments,theseresultsstronglysuggestthatthelightingusedwasaninsignificantsourceofvariation.

    Focusingonlightingintensity,itwasexpectedthatthemediumlightintensitywouldproducethemedianvalueforeachgrowthcategories.Inreality,mediumlightlevelsactuallyproducedthesmallestaveragenumbersforhalfofthedatacategoriesinbothlightingtypes.Thisisbestexplainedbythegreaterimpactoftheothervariablesinfluencinggrowth.Thismediumlightinglevelisthemostrelevant,however,asitrepresentstheamountoflightcurrentlyprovidedinthegreenhouses.Also,flatstestedundermediumlightlevelsweremostsimilarlypositionedrelativetofansandthusshouldhavesimilarlevelsofmoisture.Everyplantalsohadatleastonemediumlightingtreatmentflatwhile3productionplantsdidnothaveloworhighintensityflats.Height,diameter,largestleaflength&width,leafcount,andMonardasbranchingallweregreateronaverageunderTGlighting(0.5,0.9,0.5,3.0and2.0SDsofaveragedifference,respectively)whiletotalshootsandrootscorewereaslightlygreaterunderHPS(0.3and0.3SDsofaveragedifference,respectively).

  • Rootdatawasalsoselectivelyanalyzed.Rootscoresweredeterminedbytakingpicturesofeachplantsrootsandgivingascorebetween05relativetotheotherplants.Thiswasthusthemostsubjectiveofthedatacategoriestaken.Especiallydryorwetsoilwasnotedaswellasseverityofboltinginfloweringplants.Bothlightingtreatmentsproducedthebestresultsunderhighlightingwithmediumlightslightlyoutperforminglowlight.Boltinghadinconsistenteffects.WetanddryconditionsappearedtoadverselyaffectrootdevelopmentaswellexceptfordryandnormalconditionshavingequalresultsforHPS.Overall,HPShadaslightadvantageinaveragerootsscores.Byobservation,itappearedthatTGplantsoccasionallyhadlarger,whiterrootsthanHPSwhileHPSplantshadagreaternumberofsmaller,brownercoloredroots.

    Discussion:

    Plantsgrownunder1000WHPSandtheeffectiveequivalentamountof150WTG15Alightsdidnotdemonstrateanyconsistentsignificantdifference.Occasionalvariationswithinthesmallsamplesizesofindividualplantvarietiesandlightintensitieswerebetterattributedtouncontrolledvariablesthantolightsourceastheyfavoredeachlightsourcerelativelyequally.Forexample,MonardaandHeucherellashowplantsunderTotalGrowlightsrelativelyconsistentlyoutscoredHPStrials,butDianthusandCarexplantsunderHPSlightsshowedsimilartrendsovertheirTGequivalents.

    Whencombiningallresults,thereappearstobeaslighttrendofTGplantshavinggreaterabovegroundgrowthandHPSplantshavinggreatergrowthinrootsandnewshoots.ThismaybeduetotheradiantheatofHPSlightsthatdriesoutsoilmorequickly.TheresultsshouldbedriersoilsunderHPSplantsthanTGplantswhichwouldfavorrootdevelopmentoverabovegrounddevelopment.GrowingunderTGlightsmightallowreducedwateringneedstomaintaindriersoilsandbetterrootgrowthwhendesired.

    Rootgrowthalsoappearedtobethecharacteristicmostdirectlyimprovedbyincreasedlightingintensities,especiallyunderTGlighting.Averagerootscoresimprovedby0.6(ona05scale)forbothlightingtypeswiththeincreasefromlowtohighlightingintensity.Itwastheonlycategorythatincreasedbothfromlowtomediumintensityandmediumtohighintensityunderbothlightingtypes.Again,thismaybeconfoundedbyincreasingsoiltemperaturesanddrynessunderincreasedlights,butrepresentsanopportunitytorefinegrowingstrategiestoimproverootgrowthwhenthatisapriority.

  • Figures:

    5 7 9 12 15 17 20 22 23 24 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 25 25 25 25 24 23 22 20 17 15 12 9 7 5

    6 8 11 15 18 22 25 27 29 30 31 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 31 30 29 27 25 22 18 15 11 8 6

    7 10 14 18 23 27 31 34 36 37 38 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 38 37 36 34 31 27 23 18 14 10 7

    8 11 16 21 27 32 37 40 42 44 45 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 45 44 42 40 37 32 27 21 16 11 8

    9 13 18 24 31 37 42 46 49 51 52 53 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 53 52 51 49 46 42 37 31 24 18 13 9

    9 14 20 27 35 42 47 51 54 56 58 59 60 60 60 59 59 60 60 60 59 58 56 54 51 47 42 35 27 20 14 9

    10 15 21 29 37 45 51 56 59 61 63 64 64 65 64 64 64 64 65 64 64 63 61 59 56 51 45 37 29 21 15 10

    10 15 22 30 39 47 53 58 61 63 65 66 67 67 67 66 66 67 67 67 66 65 63 61 58 53 47 39 30 22 15 10

    10 15 22 30 39 47 53 58 61 63 65 66 67 67 67 66 66 67 67 67 66 65 63 61 58 53 47 39 30 22 15 10

    10 15 21 29 37 45 51 56 59 61 63 64 64 65 64 64 64 64 65 64 64 63 61 59 56 51 45 37 29 21 15 10

    9 14 20 27 35 42 47 51 54 56 58 59 60 60 60 59 59 60 60 60 59 58 56 54 51 47 42 35 27 20 14 9

    9 13 18 24 31 37 42 46 49 51 52 53 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 53 52 51 49 46 42 37 31 24 18 13 9

    8 11 16 21 27 32 37 40 42 44 45 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 45 44 42 40 37 32 27 21 16 11 8

    7 10 14 18 23 27 31 34 36 37 38 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 38 37 36 34 31 27 23 18 14 10 7

    6 8 11 15 18 22 25 27 29 30 31 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 31 30 29 27 25 22 18 15 11 8 6

    5 7 9 12 15 17 20 22 23 24 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 25 25 25 25 24 23 22 20 17 15 12 9 7 5

    Figure1TotalGrowPARoutput(mole*m2*s1).Squaresrepresentonesquarefoot.RedareasrepresentlowerthannormallevelsofequivalentsupplementallightingforWaltersGardensgreenhouses,greenrepresentsnormalrangesandyellowrepresentsincreasedlevels.Blueboxesshowactualareasusedfortestingtheselightlevels.DarkgreenareasareidealtestareasduetocomparableairflowlevelstodarkgreenareasunderHPSlighting(seefigure2).Thickoutlinesrepresentfixturelocations.

    28 28 30 30 28 28 30 32 34 34 33 33 32 31 32 32 32 32 31 32 33 33 34 34 32 30 28 28 30 30 28 28

    36 36 39 39 36 36 38 39 40 39 38 37 36 35 36 37 37 36 35 36 37 38 39 40 39 38 36 36 39 39 36 36

    45 46 49 49 46 45 48 48 46 44 43 41 40 40 41 42 42 41 40 40 41 43 44 46 48 48 45 46 49 49 46 45

    53 54 58 58 54 53 54 53 50 48 47 46 45 45 46 46 46 46 45 45 46 47 48 50 53 54 53 54 58 58 54 53

    58 61 66 66 61 58 57 55 52 51 52 53 52 51 51 51 51 51 51 52 53 52 51 52 55 57 58 61 66 66 61 58

    69 73 77 77 73 69 65 62 60 60 61 60 59 58 57 57 57 57 58 59 60 61 60 60 62 65 69 73 77 77 73 69

    84 89 91 91 89 84 78 75 75 74 72 70 67 65 65 65 65 65 65 67 70 72 74 75 75 78 84 89 91 91 89 84

    95 99 ## ## 99 95 88 85 87 86 82 77 73 70 69 68 68 69 70 73 77 82 86 87 85 88 95 99 ## ## 99 95

    ## ## ## ## ## ## 95 94 96 94 89 83 76 72 69 67 67 69 72 76 83 89 94 96 94 95 ## ## ## ## ## ##

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## 99 93 86 79 74 71 69 69 71 74 79 86 93 99 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    96 91 88 88 91 96 ## ## ## ## 92 85 80 76 75 74 74 75 76 80 85 92 ## ## ## ## 96 91 88 88 91 96

    91 84 81 81 84 91 ## ## ## ## 94 88 82 78 77 77 77 77 78 82 88 94 ## ## ## ## 91 84 81 81 84 91

    87 81 81 81 81 87 99 ## ## ## ## 93 85 80 78 78 78 78 80 85 93 ## ## ## ## 99 87 81 81 81 81 87

    87 81 81 81 81 87 99 ## ## ## ## 93 85 80 78 78 78 78 80 85 93 ## ## ## ## 99 87 81 81 81 81 8791 84 81 81 84 91 ## ## ## ## 94 88 82 78 77 77 77 77 78 82 88 94 ## ## ## ## 91 84 81 81 84 91

    96 91 88 88 91 96 ## ## ## ## 92 85 80 76 75 74 74 75 76 80 85 92 ## ## ## ## 96 91 88 88 91 96 Figure2HighPressureSodiumoutput(mole*m2*s1).Squaresrepresentonesquarefoot.RedareasrepresentlowerthannormallevelsofequivalentsupplementallightingforWaltersGardensgreenhouses,greenrepresentsnormalrangesandyellowrepresentsincreasedlevels.Blueboxesshowactualareasusedfortestingtheselightlevels.DarkgreenareasareidealtestareasduetocomparableairflowlevelstodarkgreenareasunderTGlighting(seefigure1).Thickoutlinesrepresentfixturelocations.

  • 0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.40

    Averages(AllPlants)

    TotalGrow

    HPS

    Figure3Normalizedaveragesforthe8measuredcategoriesofgrowthforallplantsundereachlightingtreatment.Errorbarsrepresentonestandarddeviationgreaterorless.

    0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.60

    LightIntensityAverages(AllPlants)

    TGLow

    TGMed

    TGHigh

    HPSLow

    HPSMed

    HPSHigh

    Figure4Normalizedaveragesforeachgrowthcategoryseparatedbybothlightingtypeandlightintensity.Errorbarsrepresentonestandarddeviationgreaterorless.

  • Figure5TotalGrowtestareaattheendofthetest.

    Figure6TotalGrowfinishingplantstestsatweek1andweek8.

  • Figure7TotalGrowproductionplantstestatweek1andweek8.Moreplantvarietieswereaddedasthetestprogressed.


Recommended