+ All Categories
Home > Government & Nonprofit > warm mix casselberry comp

warm mix casselberry comp

Date post: 14-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: florida-public-works-expo-2016-tampa-florida
View: 173 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
Warm Mix Asphalt: The City of Casselberry’s Experience with WMA Kelly H. Brock, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP, ENV SP Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Casselberry, FL APWA Florida Chapter Conference and Exposition - April 20, 2016
Transcript
Page 1: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt:

The City of Casselberry’s

Experience with WMAKelly H. Brock, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP, ENV

SPAssistant Public Works Director/City

EngineerCity of Casselberry, FL

APWA Florida Chapter Conference and Exposition - April 20, 2016

Page 2: warm mix casselberry comp
Page 3: warm mix casselberry comp

City of Casselberry Characteristics

“Crossroads” of SR 436 and US 17-92

Approximately 7.5 square miles

Mostly “built out” suburban/urban environment

Approximately 63 miles of City public roads

Until 2009 lack of a systematic pavement management program

Page 4: warm mix casselberry comp

Pavement Management 2009: completed

PASER evaluation

Page 5: warm mix casselberry comp

Pavement Management 2009: completed

PASER evaluation 2011: took out

$5.3M construction loan for Neighborhood Improvement Program & applied for TIGER grant

Page 6: warm mix casselberry comp

Pavement Management 2013: Developed

mandatory WMA Specification & completed first major road rehab project with WMA (“Area 1-3”)

Page 7: warm mix casselberry comp

Pavement Management 2014-15:

Completed 2nd major rehab project with WMA (“Area 4-7”)

2015: Sales tax into effect

2016: Pavement Management Plan formalized in draft Multimodal Transportation Master Plan (includes WMA)

Page 8: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt 2013-2016: 15

miles /20,708 tons of WMA used

By 2025: 24 miles/33,784 tons of WMA

Projects to date have used WMA Type SP 9.5 Level B (w/ Evotherm)

“Typical” resurfacing thickness of 1.5”

Page 9: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt Contractor

feedback Pros

Workability (especially winter – highly recommended)

Finer SP 9.5 vs 12.5 produces nicer quality/look (when 1.5” total thickness)

Page 10: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt Contractor feedback

Cons Can be too

workable in summer (adapt to timing/temperature, especially for curves/radii)

Page 11: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt Contractor feedback

Prefer Evotherm over water-injected (but Evotherm does require storage and extra cost)

Plant costs about the same in isolated batches (but if everyone used WMA electricity cost would go down)

Page 12: warm mix casselberry comp

Warm Mix Asphalt City of

Casselberry observations Quality

surface Reasonable

cost Estimated CO2

savings 9.4 tons/yr 2013-2025

Longevity advantage over HMA: TBD

Page 13: warm mix casselberry comp

Questions?

Page 14: warm mix casselberry comp

Contact Information

Kelly Brock, Ph.D., P.E., Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer [email protected] (407) 262 7725 ext 1235 www.casselberry.org/go


Recommended