+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500...

Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500...

Date post: 08-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
59
1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center for Equitable Growth Working paper series What’s the right minimum wage? Reframing the debate from ‘no job loss’ to a ‘minimum living wage’ David R. Howell Kea Fiedler Stephanie Luce June 2016 Revised: July 2016 http://equitablegrowth.org/working-papers/whats-right-minimum-wage-reframing- debate-no-job-loss-minimum-living-wage/ © 2016 by David R. Howell, Kea Fiedler, and Stephanie Luce. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.
Transcript
Page 1: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005

Washington Center forEquitable Growth

Working paper series

What’s the right minimum wage? Reframing the debate from ‘no job loss’

to a ‘minimum living wage’

David R. HowellKea Fiedler

Stephanie Luce

June 2016Revised: July 2016

http://equitablegrowth.org/working-papers/whats-right-minimum-wage-reframing-debate-no-job-loss-minimum-living-wage/

© 2016 by David R. Howell, Kea Fiedler, and Stephanie Luce. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.

Page 2: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

June7,2016

What’stheRightMinimumWage?ReframingtheDebatefrom‘NoJobLoss’toa‘MinimumLivingWage’1

DavidR.Howell,KeaFiedlerandStephanieLuce2

Nosocietycansurelybeflourishingandhappy,ofwhichthefargreaterpartofthemembersarepoorandmiserable.Itisbutequity,besides,thatthosewhofeed,cloathandlodgethewholebodyofpeople,shouldhavesuchashareoftheproduceoftheirownlabourastobethemselvestolerablywellfed,cloathedandlodged….Thewagesoflabouraretheencouragementofindustry,whichlikeeveryotherhumanquality,improvesinproportiontotheencouragementitreceives.

AdamSmith,17763ItisanationalevilthatanyclassofHerMajesty’ssubjectsshouldreceivelessthanalivingwageinreturnfortheirutmostexertions…whereyouhavewhatwecallsweatedtrades,youhavenoorganisation,noparityofbargaining,thegoodemployerisundercutbythebad…wheretheseconditionsprevailyouhavenotaconditionofprogress,butaconditionofprogressivedegeneration.

WinstonChurchill,19064“It seems to me to be equally plain that no business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country…. By living wages, I mean more than a bare subsistence level — I mean the wages of a decent living.”

FranklinD.Roosevelt,19335

1WewishtothankMarkLevinsonforinvaluable,comments,adviceandoverallsupport.WearealsoextremelygratefultoDavidCooper,BobKuttner,LarryMishel,EdPaisley,BobPollin,JasonRochford,JohnSchmitt,LydiaTugendrajch,andJeannetteWicks-Limfortheircontributions,andforthefeedbackfromtheparticipantsoftheSEIUforum“MakingtheProgressiveEconomicCasefora$15Wage”(WashingtonDC,May5,2016).Ofcoursewetakefullresponsibilityfortheviewsandallthemistakes.ThispaperisanoffshootofHowell’sDecentJobsProject,generouslyfundedbytheWashingtonCenterforEquitableGrowthandtheRussellSageFoundation.2DavidHowellisProfessorofEconomicsandPublicPolicyatTheNewSchool.KeaFiedlerisadoctoralcandidateinthePublicandUrbanPolicyProgramatTheNewSchool.StephanieLuceisProfessorofLaborStudiesattheMurphyInstitute,CityUniversityofNewYork.3AdamSmith(1937),pp.68,79,81.4QuotedbyAnthonyB.Atkinson(2015),p.148.5StatementontheNationalRecoveryAct.http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/odnirast.html

Page 3: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

1

Abstract

TheAmericandebateovertheproperlevelofthestatutoryminimumwagehasalwaysreflectedthetensionbetweenthetwingoalsofensuringdecentliving-wagejobswithmaximumjobopportunity.Themoralandefficiencyargumentsforawagefloorthatcankeepaworkerabovemeresubsistencehavealonghistory,datingbackatleasttoAdamSmith.TheU.S.federalminimumwagewasestablishedbythe1938FairLaborStandardsActtoensurea“minimumstandardoflivingnecessaryforhealth,efficiency,andgeneralwellbeingofworkers”andtodoso“withoutsubstantiallycurtailingemployment.”Inrecentyears,thebestevidencehasshownthatmoderateincreasesfromverylowwagefloorshavenodiscernibleeffectsonemployment,whichhasstrengthenedthecaseforsubstantialincreasesintheminimumwage.Buttheverystrengthofthisnewevidence—researchdesignsthateffectivelyidentifyemploymenteffectsatthelevelofindividualestablishments—hascontributedtotheadoptionofanarrowNo-Job-Loss(NJL)criterion:thatthe“right”wageflooristheonethatpreviousresearchhasdemonstratedwillposelittleornoriskoffuturejobloss,anywhere.Theeconomist’sParetoCriterion—agoodpolicyisonethatdoesnoimmediateharmtoanyone—hasreplacedtheearliermuchbroaderconcernwithaggregateemploymenteffects,andmoregenerally,withoverallnetbenefitstoworkingfamilies.Theexplicitmoralandefficiencyframingofthecaseforalivingwagebyearliergenerationsofeconomists,advocates,andpolicymakershastakenabackseattostatisticaljoustingoverwhichwagefloorwillposenoriskofjobloss(orharm)toanyone.WethinkthedebateovertheproperlevelofthestatutoryminimumwageshouldbereframedfromaNJLtoaMinimumLivingWage(MLW)standard:thelowestwageafull-timeworkerneedsforaminimallydecentstandardofliving.ThispaperillustratesandcritiquestherecentNJLframing,aswellastheusefulnessofonemetricthathasbeenheavilyrelieduponforidentifyingtheNJLthreshold—theratioofthewagefloortotheaveragewage(theKaitzindex).Wearguethattheproperframingofthedebateisnotoverthestatisticalriskofthelossofsomepoverty-wage,high-turnoverjobs,butratheroverthewagefloorthatestablishesaminimallydecentstandardoflivingfromfull-timeworkforallworkers,alongwithcomplementarypoliciesthatwouldensurethatanycostsofjoblosswouldbemorethanfullyremedied.

Page 4: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

2

Myownviewisthatexplicitgoalsareimportant,andthatchangingthediscourseisastepontheroadtoachievingtheambition.AnthonyB.Atkinson,20156

1.IntroductionThedebateoverlowpayanditslowerboundaryhaslongrestedonmoralandeconomicefficiencyarguments.Attherootofthedebateisthehistoricalexperiencethatunregulatedlabormarketsinvariablyfailtogeneratewagessufficienttomaintainaproductiveworkforce,toensurethereproductionofthatworkforce(adequatechildrearing),andtoprovideaminimallydecentqualityoflifeaccordingtoprevailingstandards.Individuallybargainedwagesforless-skilledworkersareset,asAdamSmithputit,bythe“demandforlabour,andthepriceofthenecessariesandconveniencesoflife”(Smith1937,p.85).Butthenormalconditioninlow-skilllabormarketsisasurpluspoolofworkers(todayasin1776)which,intheabsenceofregulation,drivesthewagedownbelowefficientandmorallyacceptablelevels.Inlightofthis“hunger-discipline,”eventheAmericanneoclassicaleconomistJ.B.Clarkcalledforminimumwagelegislationasearlyas1913(Clark1913).Labormarketfailurealsoexplainstheopeningwordsofthe1938FairLaborStandardsAct(FLSA1938),whichcallsforpaythatensuresa“minimumstandardoflivingnecessaryforhealth,efficiency,andgeneralwellbeingofworkers”(FLSA1938,article202).7.Andfinally,ithelpsexplaintheriseofthelivingwagemovementinthepost-1980UnitedStatesandUnitedKingdom,alongwiththecurrent“Fightfor$15.”

Afterexperiencingsubstantialwagegainsduringtheshared-growthdecadesofthepost-warGoldenAge(1947-73),Americanworkershaveincreasinglyconfrontedlabormarketscharacterizedbyprecariousjobsthatpaytoolittletoprovideafull-timeworkerwithaminimallydecentstandardofliving.Itiswell-establishedthatAmerica’sproductivitygrowthsincethelate1970shasbeenalmostentirelyunsharedwiththevastmajorityofworkers.In2014,theaveragehourlywagesatthe10th,20thand30thpercentileswerejust$8.62,$10.08and$12.09respectively,whichisnearlyexactlywhattheyearnedininflation-adjustedtermsalmostfourdecadesagoin1979.Eventhemedianwage(the50thpercentile)increasedbyjust

6Atkinson(2015),p.140.7TheFLSAthengoesontostatethatthestandardsshouldbeimplemented“"withoutsubstantiallycurtailingemploymentorearningpower."(Article202(b)).MostoftheNJLpositionarguesfornojobslostanywhere,foranyone,whereastheFLSAtextcanbeinterpretedtorefertonetemploymenteffects.

Page 5: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

3

85centsbetween1979and1999($16.02to$16.87),andjust3centsmoresince1999,reaching$16.90in2014(EPI2015).8Oneofthemosteffectivetoolsforensuringthatemployerspayawagesufficienttokeepalltheirfull-timeworkersabovepoverty-levelincomesisthestatutoryminimumwage.Anappropriatelydesignedlegalwagefloornotonlycanlifthouseholdswithafull-timeworkeroutofpovertybutalsoincreasetheincentivetowork,reduceswageandincomeinequality,andlessentheneedformeans-testedsocialassistanceforworkingpoorfamilies.ButthishasnotbeenthepathoftheU.S.federalminimumwage,whichhascollapsedinvaluefrom$9.54in1968to$8.00in1979toamere$7.25today(Cooperetal.2015,Table1).InresponsetoCongressionalinaction,manystatesandlocalitieshavelegislatedincreasesinthestatutoryminimumwage.CaliforniaandNewYorkpassedlargeincreasesintheirstatewideminimumwageratesinearly2016.California’swagewillberaisedinincrementsfromthecurrent$10perhouruntilitreaches$15by2022.9TheNewYorkratewillreach$15bytheendof2018foremployersinNewYorkCitywith11ormoreemployees(WoffordandTobia2016).10Even“red”(stronglyRepublican)stateshaverecentlypassedlargeminimumwageincreases.11Eightcities,includingSeattle,SanFrancisco,andLosAngeles,arescheduledtoraisethemunicipalminimumwagetoaround$15overthenextseveralyears.12Furthermore,inarecentpoll,two-thirdsofthemayorssurveyedsaidtheywouldendorsea$15minimumwage(ibid.).Theonlyrealcontroversyintoday’sminimumwagedebate,evenamongeconomists,isoverhowbigtheincreaseshouldbe.Thispaperarguesthatthereisaneedtoreframethedebateovertheappropriatetargetforthefederalstatutoryminimumwage.Areviewofthehistoricaldebatesuggeststwocontendingperspectives.Asking“Howmuchistoomuch?”,onesidesupportsahigherwage8EPI(2015)showssimilarstagnation.9Smallcompanies(25orfeweremployees)willhaveuntil2023toreachthe$15threshold.10Anadditional25citiesandcountieshavesetorraisedtheirmunicipalminimumwagesince2002,butnotallofthemhaveseta$15-per-hourwage.Forexample,Chicagosetaminimumwagethatwillreach$13perhourby2019.http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/minimum-wage-living-wage-resources/inventory-of-us-city-and-county-minimum-wage-ordinances/11AsDavidCardandAlanKrueger(2015,p.xiii)note,“Furthermore,thefactthatcitizensinfour“red”states—Alaska,Arkansas,NebraskaandSouthDakota—votedoverwhelminglyin2014toraisetheirstates’minimumwagestoashighas$9.75anhouristestamenttothewidespreadbipartisanappealoftheminimumwageamongvoters.”12Anadditional25citiesandcountieshavesetorraisedtheirmunicipalminimumwagesince2002,butnotallhaveseta$15-per-hourwage.Forexample,Chicagosetaminimumwagethatwillreach$13perhourby2019.http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/minimum-wage-living-wage-resources/inventory-of-us-city-and-county-minimum-wage-ordinances/

Page 6: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

4

flooraslongasthe‘causenoharm’constraintismet.Inthisview,theproperwageissetbytheNoJobLoss(NJL)criterion:thehighestwagethatwidelyacceptedresearchhasalreadydemonstratedwillposelittleornojobloss.Ontheotherside,thequestionis“Howlittleistoolittle?”Thewagefloorisnotsetonthenegativegroundsofavoidingriskoftheunintendedconsequencesofjobloss,butratheronthepositivegroundsofensuringthatfull-timeworkcansupportaminimallyacceptablestandardofliving.Inthisview,theproperstandardistheMinimumLivingWage(MLW):thelowestwageafull-timeworkerneedstoprovideaminimallydecentstandardofliving.Thisdividecanbevividlyseeninthecurrentpresidentialelection,withHillaryClintonunwillingtosupportafederalwagefloorabove$12onaquiteexplicit“No-Job-Loss”standard,whileBernieSandershasadvocateda$15wageonstandard-of-livinggrounds.Inadditiontothisdescriptionofthefundamentaltensioninthedebate,thispaperarguesthatbecauserecentstate-of-the-artempiricalevidencehasconvincedmosteconomiststhatsubstantialhikesinthewagefloorarepossiblewithoutdiscernibleemploymenteffects,thetermsofthedebatehaveconverged,withliving-wageadvocatesoftenmakingtheircaseonNJLgrounds:amuchhigherwagefloorcanbeachievedwithoutanyjoblossandthetechnicaldebateisnowoverwheretheNJLthresholdis.Indeed,giventhegrowingacceptanceamongeconomiststhattherearemanychannelsthroughwhichwageincreasescanbeaccommodatedbeyondtheemploymentcutsrequiredbythesimple,downward-sloping-demandmodelofeconomics101,advocateshavemadethecaseforsubstantialhikesinthewagefloorontheconventionalParetocriterionofnoharmtoanyone,onthegroundsthatthehigherwagecoststhatfollowfromtheadoptionofamuchhigherminimumwagecanbeentirelyaccommodatedbyhigherproductivity,lowerturnovercosts,andhighersalesfromincreasedconsumerspending.ThispaperoffersacriticalperspectiveonthisconvergenceintheminimumwagediscoursetoanNJLframing.ThenextsectionprovidesahistoricalaccountofthechangesintherelativevalueoftheU.S.federalminimumwage,withcomparisonstothepovertyline,abasicneeds-basedbudget,themedianwage,andnationalproductivitygrowth.InSection3,weillustratetheimportanceoftheNJLcriterioninthedebate,andcritiqueit.OurcritiquedistinguishesbetweentwoNJLapproaches:thebackward-lookingNJLapproach,inwhichweareconstrainedtonavigateinthe“chartedwaters”ofstatisticalevidenceofemploymenteffectsfromwagefloorssetinotherlocationsatsomeearlierpointintime;andtheforward-looking(or“innear-real-time”)NJLapproach,inwhichincreasesintheminimumwageareimplementedintherelevantlocationandimmediatelymonitoredforemploymenteffects,which

Page 7: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

5

isbroadlyspeakingthetakenbytheUnitedKingdominthefirstyearsoftheirNationalMinimumWage(1999-2005).InSection4,wecontendthattheheavilyreliedupon“Kaitzindex”—theratiooftheminimumwagetoanaverageormedianwage—isapoorguideforidentifyingtheNJLwagethreshold.Whileagoodmeasureoftherelativevalueoftheminimumwage,thereisnotheoreticalorempiricalreasontobelieveaparticularKaitzratiocanbeareliableindicatorofjobloss.Neitherthefactorsthatsteeremployerdecisionsonthehiringandretentionofworkersatverylowwagesnorthelaborsupplydecisionsofminimumwageworkershavemuchtodowiththemedianwageofaparticulargeographicallydefinedlabormarket(thenation,stateormetropolitanarea).Othercountries,suchasAustralia,theUnitedKingdom,andFrance,couldpushupthewagefloorbecausetheywereunconstrainedbyabackward-lookingNJLrule,whetherfixedtoaparticularwage(e.g.,$10.10)orbyaparticularpercentageofthemedianwage(e.g.,50percent).EvidenceforFranceispresentedthatsuggestsconvergencewiththeUnitedStatesoverthepasttwodecadesinemploymentperformanceforlow-skillworkers,despiteaveryhighandrisingFrenchminimumwageandanextremelylowandfallingU.S.federalminimumwage.InSection5,wesuggestthattheU.S.federalwagefloorshouldbesetbyreferencetoastandardoflivingrule—thelowestwagethatafull-timeworkerneedsforaminimallydecentlivingstandard,basedonbasic-needsbudgets.Beyondthis,wemakenospecificproposal,whichwouldbefarbeyondthescopeofthispaper.ButwedosuggestthatonepossiblemodelwouldbetosetthefederalMLWforasingleindividualinalow-modestcost-of-livingregionandcomplementitwithuniversalper-childallowances.Aquasi-governmentalbody,liketheLowPayCommissionintheUnitedKingdom,couldbechargedwithstatisticalanalysis,settingtheMLW,monitoringemploymenteffects,andrecommendingcompensatoryresponsesforanyjoblossesthatoccur.Moregenerally,agoodruleonmattersofsocialpolicyistoreturntothetaskoutlinedbyFranklinD.Roosevelt.

OurproblemistoworkoutinpracticethoselaborstandardswhichwillpermitthemaximumbutprudentemploymentofourhumanresourcestobringwithinthereachoftheaveragemanandwomanamaximumofgoodsandofservicesconducivetothefulfillmentofthepromiseofAmericanlife(PresidentRoosevelt,1937).

Page 8: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

6

2.TheHistoricalContext:FromLoftyGoalstoaPovertyWageWhilethequestionoftheproperlevelsofsupportforthepoorspansmanycenturies,13themoderndebateoversettingalegalwagefloorappearsinboththeUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStatesinthelate19thandearly20thcentury,justifiedonmoralandefficiencygroundsinthefaceofappallinglaborexploitation(Webb,1912;Clark,1913;Douglas,1925).ThesamemoralconvictionmotivatedtheenactmentoftheFairLaborStandardsAct(FSLA)of1938,whichestablishedtheU.S.federalminimumwage.AdvocatingforpassageoftheFLSA,PresidentRoosevelt(1937)stressedtheimportanceoffairnessinthelabormarket:“Ournationsorichlyendowedwithnaturalresourcesandwithacapableandindustrialpopulation,shouldbeabletodevisewaysandmeansofinsuringtoallourable-bodedworkingmenandwomenafairday’spayforafairday’swork.”Roosevelt’s“fairday’spay”wasdefinedasthelowestwage“necessaryforhealth,efficiency,andgeneralwell-beingofworkers,”whichtodayiswhatisusuallymeantbya“livingwage.”ThedebateoverwhatbecametheFairLaborStandardsAct(1938)focusedontheconstitutionalrightofthefederalgovernmenttointerveneinprivatevoluntarycontractsandlocalstateeconomicaffairs,ontheconsequencesforregionalcompetitivenessintheAmericansouth,aswellasoveraboutjobloss.Afteralongpoliticalstruggle,thecompromisewasanationwideminimumwagesetatjust25cents(RooseveltandPerkins’goalwas40cents).Thisamountwasequivalenttoabout$4.24in2016inflation-adjusteddollarsandcoveredonlyaboutone-fifthoftheworkforce(Grossman1978).Thefinalminimumwagepolicycontainednoformulatosetthefuturewagefloorsandnomechanismtoindexittoinflation.Accordingly,anyfutureincreaseswouldrequireanActofCongress.Thesubsequenthistoryisoneoffluctuationsaroundaverylowwagefloor.Atthesametime,theshareoftheworkforcecoveredbythefederalminimumdidincreasedramaticallyin1961andafterwardswhenthelawwasamendedtocovernewcategoriesofworkers,includingthoseemployedprimarilyinretail,localconstruction,transit,andgasstations.14Thefederalminimumwagepeakedat$9.54

13OntheexperienceintheWesternworld,seeforexample,KarlPolanyi([1944]2001)andPeterLindert(2004).14Anumberofgroupsofworkersareexemptedfromthefederalminimumwage.First,personsundertheageof20maybepaidanhourlywageof$4.25forthefirst90calendardaysofemployment.Second,employersmaypaytippedworkersaminimumof$2.13anhouraslongasthehourlywageplustipequalsatleasttheminimumwage.This$2.13tippedminimumwagehasnotbeenincreasedsince1991.(Somestateshaveincreasedthetippedwagelevel,and7stateshaveeliminatedthetipcreditaltogether.)Iftheweeklytotaloftipsplusthebasewageislessthena

Page 9: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

7

in1968(in2014inflation-adjusteddollars).UnderPresidentReagan’sleadership,theU.S.Congressfailedtoincreasethenominalminimumwagetooffsetinflation,andtherealvalueoftheminimumwagefelltoameager$6.18in1989(Cooper2016).Figure1showsrealannualearningsforafull-timefull-yearworker(40hours,52weeks)earningtheminimumwagefrom1964to2014alongwithpovertylinesforone-,two-,andthree-personfamilies.Whilethefederalminimumwageprovidedafamilywithafull-timeworkerawagebetweenthepovertylinesofatwo-andthree-personfamilyuntilaround1982,ithassincefallentolevelsbetweenthesingle-andtwo-personpovertylines.Full-time,full-yearworkin2014wouldgenerategrosspayofonly$15,080,puttingafamilyoftwobelowthepovertyline.15Figure2offersanotherperspectiveontherelativevalueofthefederalwagefloor.Therehavebeenanumberofeffortsinrecentyearstoestimateabasicsubsistencewageforworkersindifferentfamilytypes(e.g.singleadult,singleadultwithonechild,twoadultswithtwochildren).16Mostfindthatthewageneededtopaythebasiccostsofliving—housing,food,transportation,utilities,taxes,healthcare,savings,clothing,andpersonalitems—requiresafull-timejobatawagethatis,asFigure2suggests,atleast$14forasingleperson,andsubstantiallymoreforasingleadultwithonedependentchildinlowcost-of-livingareas.Weshowthecurrentminimumwageonthisfigure,whichisabouthalfofthenecessarywagetosupportasinglepersoninsevenoftheninecities,43percentofwhatisnecessaryinBaltimoreandjustone-thirdofthenecessarywageinWashingtonDC.TheadequacyoftheminimumwagecanalsobecomparedtothetypicalpayofallworkersusingtheKaitzindex,definedastheratiooftheminimumwagetoanaverage(meanormedian)wage.AsFigure3shows,bythismeasure,theminimumwagepeakedat55percentin1968andhasdroppedprecipitouslysince,rangingfrom31-to-39percentsincethemid-1980s.

week’ssalaryattheminimumwage,employersarelegallyobligatedtomakeupthedifference,buttherehasbeenlittleenforcement.Investigating9,000restaurants,theU.S.DepartmentofLaborfoundthatin85percentofthecases,restaurantsdidnotadequatelycompensatetheiremployeesfortipincomesthatfellshortoftherequired$7.25(Cooper2016).15Foreligibleworkers(mainlywomenwithyoungchildren),asmuchasabout$2,500couldalsobereceivedfromtheEarnedIncomeTaxCredit.Ourconcernhereisnotwithtotalfamilyincome,butwiththeadequacyofearningsfromwork.16ThisincludestheEconomicPolicyInstitute’sFamilyBudgetCalculator,theSelf-SufficiencyStandarddevelopedbyDianaPearce,andtheMITLivingWageCalculatordevelopedbyAmyGlasmeier.Alloftheseprovideestimatesoftheincomeneededtocoverbasiclivingcosts,byfamilysizeandtypeaswellascityandstate.AlsoseeFredericksen(2015).

Page 10: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

8

Stillanotherstandardbywhichtojudgetherelativevalueoftheminimumwageistosetitagainstproductivitygrowth.Figure4showsthataftermorethantwodecadesoftrackingthenation’slaborproductivity,ayawninggapbegantoappearbetweenthegrowthintheeconomyandthechangeintheminimumwage.Inshort,risingnationalwealthhasnotbeensharedwithlow-wageworkersviatheminimumwagesincethelate1960s.Thesefiguresdemonstratethatbyanyconventionalstandard,thefederalminimumwagehasfallentoextremelylowlevels.Inresponsetothisdismalperformance,throughoutthe1990sandintothe2000s,labor-communitycoalitionspressuredtheircitycouncilstoadopt“livingwage”ordinances.Theseordinancesvaried,butmostofthemappliedtofirmsreceivingcityservicecontractsandtheirsubcontractors.Somealsoappliedtofirmsreceivingeconomicdevelopmentassistance,andafewcovereddirectcityorcountyemployees.Mostordinancesdefineda“livingwage”asthehourlywageneededtobringaworkerwithafamilyoffourtothefederalpovertyline.Mostoftheseordinanceswereindexedtoriseeveryyearwiththecostofliving,andincludedadditionalprovisionsforhealthcarecoverageanddaysoffwork.Livingwageordinancespassedinover125citiesandcountiesnationwidebetween1994and2015(Luce2014).Figure1:Full-TimeEarningsattheMinimumWageandPovertyThresholdsbyFamilyType,1962—2014

Source:Author’sanalysisofEconomicPolicyInstitute(realminimumwage),andU.S.CensusBureau(2014povertythresholds)data.

Annual&Minimum&

Wage&Earnings&(52&

weeks,&40hours/week)&

Poverty&line&for&single&

person,&$12,071&

Poverty&line&for&family&of&

two,&$15,934

Poverty&line&for&family&of&

three,&$18,518

$8,000.00

$10,000.00

$12,000.00

$14,000.00

$16,000.00

$18,000.00

$20,000.00

$22,000.00

1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014

Page 11: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

9

Figure2:TheMinimumWageandtheFull-timeHourlyWageRequiredforBasic-NeedsBudgetbyFamilyTypeforSelectedCitiesin2016

Source:Tungetal.(2015);ownfigure.Figure3:RatiooftheMinimumWagetotheMedianWage(Kaitzindex),1960-2014

Source:OECD.stat(dataextractedJanuary2016).

14.64 14.10 13.45 13.91 13.6215.67

14.0317.00

21.0723.59 24.06 24.90

22.67

26.76 26.40 25.86

29.58

39.35

$0.00

$4.00

$8.00

$12.00

$16.00

$20.00

$24.00

$28.00

$32.00

$36.00

$40.00

Bakersfield Phoenix Colorado=Spr Houston Minneapolis Chicago Buffalo Baltimore Washington

Single=Adult With=1=Child

Current=Federal=Minimum=Wage: $7.25

0.55

0.40

0.47

0.39

0.31

0.37

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

Page 12: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

10

Figure4:TheMinimumWageandProductivityGrowth,1950-2014(1968=1)

Source:Author’sanalysisofEconomicPolicyInstitute’srealminimumwage(in2014dollars)andtotaleconomynetproductivitydata(realnetdomesticproductperhourworkedin2014chaineddollars).3.Wage-settingandEmploymentEffectsRiskofjoblossfromincreasesintheminimumwageisaclassicexampleofwhatHirschman(1991)calledthe“perversitythesis”—atleastsomeoftheintendedbeneficiariesareactuallyharmedbytheintervention.ButatleastsincetheworkofCardandKrueger(1994),ithasbecomeincreasinglyclearthattherearefewifanyemploymenteffectsthatcanbeattributedtomoderateincreasesinthestatutorywagefloor.Afterbrieflyreviewingthisevidence,thissectionconsidershowfirmssetwagesandmakeemploymentdecisions,whichbothhelpsexplainthefailureofsimpleorthodoxpredictionsofjoblossandsetsthestageforourcritiqueofthewayacommonindicatoroftherelativevalueoftheminimumwage(its“bite”)hasbeenemployedforsettingtheNo-Job-Loss(NJL)wagefloor.

a) Wage-employmenttradeoffs?ThedebateovertheproperleveloftheminimumwagehaspittedtheMinimumLivingWage(MLW)goalagainsttheeconomicinterestsofemployers,thelibertarianconcernoverthereachofthefederalgovernmentandtherightsofthestates,and,mostimportantly,theriskofjobloss.Mainstreameconomists,especiallythosetrainedintheUnitedStates,haveplayedacentralroleinthisdebate,bringingtoitanothersetofinterests—thedefenseofthebasictenetsoforthodoxeconomicdoctrine,whichisseenaschallengedbythefailureoffindevidenceofdiscernible

Real%Minimum%Wage:%Cummulative%Change

Total%economy%net%productivity:%

Cummulative%Change

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014

Page 13: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

11

employmenteffects.17Itishardtootherwiseexplainthemassiveoutpouringofempiricalresearchontheminimumwage,thepublicationbias(towardshowingnegativeemploymenteffects)thathascharacterizedtheprofessionalliteratureuntilrecently,18andtheemotionalhostilityexpressedtowardfindingsthatchallengeorthodoxpredictions.19Initialevidenceontheemploymenteffectsofincreasesintheminimumwageshouldbefoundinthechangesinaggregateemploymentforat-riskworkersaroundthetimeofsudden,largeincreasesinthefederalminimumwage.Whilecrude,suchevidencewouldconfirmorthodoxpredictionsofemploymenteffectsifthe“perversityeffect”isconsequential.Indeed,theFrenchminimumwageisfrequentlyblamedforhighFrenchyouthunemployment(butseebelow).Soshouldweexpecttoobservelargeshort-runresponsesofverylargeincreasesintheU.S.minimumwageon,atleast,teenageemploymentandunemploymentrates?The1950soffersevidencethatlargeincreasesdonotnecessarilyleadtodecreasesinteenemployment.TheFLSAfailedtopegtheminimumwagetoacostoflivingindicator,soafterextendedperiodsofinflation,Congresshassometimesrespondedwithlargehikesinthewagefloor.Althoughthismayhavehadtheeffectofonlyreturningthewagetoitsformerinflation-adjustedvalue,itneverthelessconfronted

17Thecaseagainsttheminimumwageonemploymenteffectsisgroundedinsimpletextbookmodelsofthelabordemandandtheory-driveneffortstoconfirmthesepredictionshavegeneratedamassiveempiricalliterature.Atleastuntilveryrecently,foralargeshareofmainstreameconomists,thetheoreticalstakescouldhardlybemoresignificant.AstheNobelprizewinningeconomistJamesBuchananhassaid,aninverserelationshipbetweenemployerdemandforlaborandthewageis“acorepropositionofeconomics”anditsrejectionwouldbe“equivalenttoadenialthatthereisevenminimalscientificcontentineconomics”(quotedbyCardandKrueger2015,Prefacetothe20thAnniversaryEditionofMythandMeasurement).18DoucouliagosandStanley(2009,p.406)findthat“Theminimumwageeffectsliteratureiscontaminatedbypublicationselectionbias,whichweestimatetobeslightlylargerthantheaveragereportedminimumwageeffect.Oncethispublicationselectioniscorrected,littleornoevidenceofanegativeassociationbetweenminimumwagesandemploymentremains.”19TheresponsetoCardandKrueger’spapersandbookdemonstratingnoemploymenteffectswasgreetedwithprofessionalandpersonalhostility.InthesymposiumontheMythandMeasurementina1995IndustrialandLaborRelationsReviewsymposium(ILRR,July1995,vol.48no.4),FinisWelch(1995,p.848)dismissedCardandKrueger’sresearchthatwaspublishedinarguablytheworld’stopeconomicsjournal,TheAmericanEconomicReview,as“testimonytothevagariesofthereviewprocess.”Indeed,hedismissedtheentireresearchproject:“IquestionDavidCardandAlanKrueger'smodelsandhowtheydoempiricalresearch.AlthoughthenotorietysurroundingMythsuggestsimportantconclusionsthatchallengeeconomists'fundamentalassumptions,Iamconvincedthatthebook'slong-runimpactwillinsteadbetospur,bynegativeexample,amuch-neededconsiderationofstandardsweshouldinstituteforthecollection,analysis,andreleaseofprimarydata”(ibid.,p.842).ItseemsevidentthatthepasttwodecadesofresearchhaveconfirmedthevalidityofCardandKrueger’smethodsandresults.PrincetonUniversityPresshasre-issueda20thanniversaryeditionofthebook,anditremainstheclassicreference—bypositiveexample—intheminimumwageliterature.

Page 14: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

12

low-wagefirmswithasuddennominalwageshock.The1950soffertwoexamples.OnJanuary25,1950,thewagefloorwasincreasedby87.5percent,from40centsto75cents.Thisrepresentednotjustahugeincreaseinwagecostsforlow-wageemployers,butalsoasimilarlyhugeincreaseintherelativevalueoftheminimumwage.Theratiooftheminimumwagetotheaveragehourlyearningsofnon-farmprivatesectorworkersincreasedfrom31.4percentinlate1949to56.2percentinearly1950(BLS1970,tables1.5and1.6).Whatwerethelow-wageemploymenteffects?Teenageunemploymentratesactuallyfellfrom15.8percentinOctober1949(threemonthsearlier)to15.2percentinFebruary1950(onemonthlater);theseratesfellfurthertojust12percentinApril(threemonthslater);ayearlater,inApril1951,theteenageunemploymentratewasdownto7.9percent.20Muchthesamestorycanbetoldforthe33.3percentincreaseintheminimumwagethattookplaceonMarch1,1956.21Theseepisodessuggestthat,atleastinastrongeconomy,verylargeincreasesintherealandrelativewagefloorcantakeplacewithoutobservedeffectsonjobopportunitiesforthemostvulnerableworkers.Oneofthefirstlargescaleeconometricstudiesofemploymenteffectswasreportedina1970reportbytheU.S.BureauofLaborStatistics(BLS1970),ledbyHymanKaitz(forwhomtheKaitzindexisnamed).Althoughtherehavebeendramaticimprovementsinthequalityofthedataandminimumwage-employmentresearchdesigns,thelessonsofcurrentstate-of-the-artevidence(seebelow)remainaboutthesameaswhatKaitzreportedbackin1970.

Whenallvariablesthathavealegitimateclaimtoconsiderationareincluded,themeasuresofminimumwagenotinfrequentlyhavethewrongsignand/orarenotstatisticallysignificantatconventionallevels….Ingeneral,themostimportantfactorexplainingchangesinteenageemploymentandunemploymenthasbeengeneralbusinessconditionsasmeasuredbytheadultunemploymentrate….Althoughhintsofadverseeffectsofminimumwagesshowupinavailabledata,no

20MonthlyteenunemploymentratescomefromLaborForceStatisticsfromtheCurrentPopulationSurvey(seriesLNS14000012).TheinductionofyoungmenforserviceintheKoreanWarislikelytoexplainsomeofthesedeclines,althoughthenumbersweresmalluntilmid-1950.Bytheendof1950,220,000menweredrafted,andanother552,000weredraftedin1951(https://www.sss.gov/About/History-And-Records/Induction-Statistics).21SeeHymanB.Kaitz,“ExperienceofthePast:TheNationalMinimum,”ChapterIIof“YouthUnemploymentandMinimumWages,”U.S.DepartmentofLabor,“YouthUnemploymentandMinimumWages,”Bulletin1657,1970(p.11).Thewagefloorincreasedfrom75centsto$1.00inMarch1956,whichincreasedtheratiooftheminimumwagetotheaveragehourlywagefrom43.4percentto53.2percent.Officialmonthlyteenunemploymentratesfluctuatedsubstantiallyatthistime,butthereisnoobviousupwardtrend:theMarchratewas11.5percent,aboutwhatitwasthemonthbefore(11.4percent),anditwas10.9perentinApril.Whileithit12.2percentinJune,teenunemploymentwasdownto9.8percentinSeptember.

Page 15: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

13

firmstatementcanbemadeaboutthemagnitudeofsucheffects.(ibid.,p.11)

Whileresearchpublishedthroughoutthe1980sreportedsomenegativeemploymenteffectsforyoungworkers22morerecentandmuchmoremethodologicallysophisticatedstudieshaveshownthatminimumwagesdonotnecessarilycausejobloss.23Evenscholarswhoconcludethattheminimumwagehasnegativeemploymenteffectsgenerallyagreethatthesearedetectableonlyfordisadvantagedteenagers(Neumarketal.2014).24ThisfailuretofindrobustevidenceofnegativeemploymenteffectsofwagefloorsatthenationallevelhasbeendominatedbystudiesoftheUnitedStates,butithasalsobeenunambiguouslyconfirmedbystudiesoftheexperienceintheUnitedKingdom,whichestablishedanationalminimumwagein1999andincreaseditsharplyinrealandrelativevalueoverthenextdecade(D’arcyandCorlett2015).Moststudiesonlivingwageordinancesfindsimilarresults.25Thebenefitsofthehigherwagearesignificantforworkersbutthecostsarerelativelysmallfortheemployer.Surveysreportthatemployersareabletorecoupsomeofthecostintheformoflowerturnoverandabsenteeismandincreasedproductivity.Forexample,studiesoftheLosAngelesairportestimatethatthelivingwagereducedturnoverofbetween4percentand16percent(Fairrisetal.2005;Fairris2005).AstudyofhomecareworkerscoveredbyalivingwageincreaseinCaliforniafoundthatturnoverdecreased57percentafterthewagewasimplemented(Howes2005).Studiesforcitywideminimumwagelawsfindsimilarresults.AllegrettoandReichexaminedtheeffectsofa25percenthikeintheminimumwageonrestaurantpricesinSanJose,Californiaandfoundnonegativeemploymenteffects.Theyconclude,“theseresultsimplythatcitywideminimumwagepoliciesneednotresultinnegativeemploymenteffectsorshiftsofeconomicactivitytonearbyareas”(AllegrettoandReich2015).Prospectivestudiesoflargerwageincreasesatthestatewideornationalindustrylevelsuggestsimilarresults.Reichetal.(2016)estimatetheemploymenteffectsoftheNewYorkStatewageof$15.Theirmodelpredictsthatbysubstitutingsomeworkerswithautomation,andeliminatingsomejobsduetoproductivityincreases,22ForareviewseeBrownetal.(1981).23DavidCardandAlanB.Krueger(1995);Reichetal.(2005);Dube,etal.(2010);Allegrettoetal.(2011).ForanalternativeviewseeNeumarkandWascher(2008).24Prominentmeta-analysesoftheliteraturehavefound,onbalance,littleornonegativeeffectsonemployment(OECD2006;DoucouliagosandStanley2009;BelmanandWolfson2014).25Forareviewoflivingwageeconomicimpactresearch,seeChapmanandThompson(2006).

Page 16: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

14

employerswouldcutapproximately41,600jobs.Inaddition,asemployerspassonsomeofthewageincreaseintheformofhigherprices,consumerdemandwoulddropsomewhat,resultinginanother36,764jobslost.Altogether,thiswouldbealossof78,364jobs.Atthesametime,thewageincreasewouldhaveindirectpositiveemploymenteffectsthroughwage-inducedincreasesinconsumerdemand.Thatisexpectedtogenerate81,532jobs—leavinganetgainof3,168jobs.Relyingon“simpleillustrativeexercisesofthephase-inofa$15wage,PollinandWicks-Lim(2015,p.1)concludethatcostincreases“couldbeabsorbedbythefast-foodindustrynotonlywithoutcausingemploymentlosses,but,crucially,withoutbusinessfirmswithinthefast-foodindustryhavingtoreducetheiraveragerateofprofitability.”

b) HowFirmsSetWagesandEmploymentHowcanemployersbemandatedtopayahigherhourlywagewithoutrespondingwithjobcuts?Therearetwoanswers.First,employerscancutormaintaintheirwagebillbycuttinghoursinsteadofworkers.Butthegeneralansweristhatemployersrarelyfaceanythingclosetoperfectproductandlabormarkets—thefoundationalassumptionofbasiclabormarkettheorythathasdominatedtextbooksforgenerations.Undertheseimperfectconditionsthereisusuallysubstantialroomforimprovingthedesignandmanagementoftheworkplace.AsJohnSchmitt(2015)hasexplained,

Someemployersmaycuthours;others,fringebenefits;stillothers,thewagesofhighlypaidworkers.Someemployersmayraiseprices(particularlyiftheircompetitorsareexperiencingsimilarcostincreasesinresponsetotheminimumwage).Someemployersmayseetheirprofitsfall(alongwiththoseoftheircompetitors),whileothersmayreorganizetheworkprocessinordertolowercosts.Someofthestrongestevidencesuggeststhatmanyemployersmayexperiencedeclinesincostlyturnover.Andworkersmayrespondtothehigherwagebyworkingharder.Anyofthesechannelsmightbesufficienttoeliminatetheneedforemploymentcutsorreducethesizeofemploymentcuts(Schmitt2015,pp.547-581).

Wewouldaddthatemploymenteffectsalsodependonwhethercostsareshiftedtohigherpaidemployeesandwhetherincreasedconsumerspendingbymorehighlypaidminimumwageworkersaffectsprofitmargins.TheResolutionFoundation(2014)comestoasimilarconclusionfortheexperienceoftheUnitedKingdomwith

Page 17: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

15

anationalwagefloorsince1999—despiteitsrapidincreasetolevelssubstantiallyhigherthantheU.S.federalminimumwage(seefigures5and6).26Theambiguousevidenceontheemploymenteffectsoftheminimumwageisconsistentwithwhattheoryandevidencesuggestaboutwagesettinginrealworldworkplaces.Whetheranemployerwillcuthoursorworkersinresponsetoamandatedwageincreasedependsontheabilityandwillingnessofthefirmtoabsorbcostincreasesthroughproductivitygains,lowerturnovercosts,adjustmentsintheinternalfirmwage/salarystructure,orlowerprofitmargins.Theseproximatedeterminantsofthewage-employmentrelationshipareinturnareflectionofthelow-wageshareofoveralloperatingcosts,theresponsivenessofproductmarketdemandtocostincreases,andthebusinessmodelsrelieduponforcompetinginimperfectlabormarkets.27Theseproximateandunderlyingdeterminantsofthewage-employmentrelationshipwillvarysubstantiallybyestablishment,firm,region,andsector.Onehasonlytocompare,forexample,thewage-settingpracticesatWal-MartandCostco.28Botharelargediscountstoresprovidingasimilarservice,butCostcopaysitsemployeesmuchhigherwages,providesbenefits,andoffersmorehoursperworkweekthandoesWal-Mart.Totakeanotherexample,collectivebargaininghasledtolargewageincreasesfordoormenandcleanersinluxuryapartmentbuildingsintheNewYorkmetropolitanareainrecentyears,which,becauseoftheverylowlaborshareofoperatingcostsandhighinelasticityofhousingdemand,hasledtononegativeemploymenteffects.4.TheCurrentDebate:What’sWrongwith‘NoJobLoss’FramingWithlittleornoempiricalsupportfortheorthodoxpredictionofemploymenteffectsfrompreviousmodestincreasesinthewagefloorfrom,andabetterunderstandingofalternativechannelsofadjustmenttohigherwagecosts,thediscoursehasincreasinglyfocusedonspeculationabouthowbigthehikeinthewagefloorcanbewithoutposingahighriskofatleastsomejobloss.Itisspeculativebecausewedon’tknowforsure,andwon’tknowuntilthefederalwageisactuallypushedtomuchhigherlevelsthanthecurrent$7.25andwecarefullymonitortheactualemploymenteffects.Thelimitedevidencefromcities,statesand26“Researchintowhythoseofjoblosseswerenotborneoutsuggeststhatemployersadaptinavarietyofways,includingraisingprices,givingsmallerpayrisestohigher-paidworkers,reducingprofits,andboostingtheproductivityoftheirstaff”(D’arcyandCorlett2015,p.1).27Theseunderlyingdeterminantshavebeenwell-knownsinceAlfredMarshallspelledthemoutoveracenturyago.28AnothercanbefoundinClark(2014).

Page 18: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

16

othercountriescandonomorethangiveushintsaboutwhattheeffectsofalargefederalminimumwageincreasewouldbe.AllagreethatoncewehavereachedthisNJLminimumwagethreshold,thejoblossthatwouldoccuraboveitisaconcern.Butinthecurrentdebate,itoftenappearsasifthisistheonlyconcern.ThissectionbeginsbydescribingthecurrentoverwhelmingdominanceofthisNJLframingoftheminimumwagediscourseandthenturnstoourcritique.a) TheNJLCriterionintheCurrentDebateandPracticeAgoodexampleoftherelianceontheNJLcriterioninmakingthecaseforalargeincreaseinthefederalminimumwageistheEPIBriefingPapertitled“WeCanAfforda$12MinimumWagein2020.”Cooperetal.(2015)makethecasethatAmericacan“afford”a$12wagein2020(worth$10.58in2014dollarsaccordingtotheauthors,or$10.92in2016dollars29)onthegroundsthatthisvalueinrealtermswasachievedbackinthelate1960s.Theauthorssupporttheircasebynotingthatthecountryisfarbetterpositionedtoaffordasubstantiallyhigherwagefloorbecauselow-wageworkereducationlevelsandtheeconomy’sproductivitylevelsarebothmuchhigherthanfourdecadesago.Forthesereasons,$12isareasonable“benchmarkfortheeconomy’sabilitytosustainaparticularwagefloor.”

Thisreportreviewsamuchwiderrangeofbenchmarksinordertoevaluatehowhighthefederalminimumwagecangoandstillfallwithinourhistoricalexperience.Anextensivebodyofresearchsincetheearly1990shasinvestigatedtheemploymentimpactsoffederal,state,andlocalminimumwagesinarangethatfallsroughlybetween$6and$10perhour.Thatresearchsuggeststhatminimumwagesinthisrangehavelittleornonegativeeffectonemployment(Cooperetal.2015,p.2).

ThispassagecontainsalltheelementsoftheNJLcriterionasdefinedabove:thegoalisthehighestwageflooralreadyestablished(withinhistoricalexperience)forwhichthereisreliableevidenceoflittleornonegativeemploymenteffects.30ConfirmingtheNJLrulelaterinthepaper,Cooperetal.writethatevidenceofwageconvergenceatthestatelevel“shouldhelptoallayconcernsthatahigherfederalminimumwagewouldhurtemploymentinlow-wagestates”(Cooperetal.2015,p.10).Cooperetal.donotaddressthequestionofwhetherahigherwage,say$15anhour,couldalsobesustainedbytheU.S.economy.29Cooper(2016),Table1.30Infact,thecurrentvalueofa2020$12wagefloor,at$10.92,isabovethe“chartedwaters”of$6-to-$10.Ontheotherhand,itmightbeviewedtobewithinhistoricalexperienceifthecriteriaweretheKaitzindex(critiquedbelow)orthelevelofproductivity(thechannelthroughwhichnationalproductivitygrowthwouldaffectthewage-employmentrelationshipforlow-wagefirmsisfarfromevident).

Page 19: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

17

OtherexamplesofexclusiverelianceontheNJLstandardincludeleadinglaboreconomistsandminimumwageresearcherswhohavestronglysupportedraisingthelegalwagefloorsubstantially,amongthemAlanKrueger,AlanManning,andArinDube.Krueger(2015)recentlywrotethatwhileanational$12wagefloorprobablyrisks“littleornojobloss,”a$15wagewouldtakeusinto“unchartedwaters”andthatdoingsowouldbe“arisknotworthtaking.”31Asheputit,“Althoughsomehigh-wagecitiesandstatescouldprobablyabsorba$15-an-hourminimumwagewithlittleornojobloss,itisfarfromclearthatthesamecouldbesaidforeverystate,cityandtownintheUnitedStates”(italicsadded).32Kruegerdidnotcontendthatatlevelsabove$12therewillbediscerniblejobloss,muchless“toomuch”jobloss,butonlythatsincewedon’thavetheevidence(unchartedwaters),itisnotworththerisk.Krueger’sargumentisaclearexampleofthebackward-lookingNJLstandardforsettingtheappropriateleveloftheminimumwage:anincreaseinthefederalwagefloorisnot“toomuch”ifwell-establishedevidencefromtestsonselectedjurisdictions(cities,counties,statesorforeigncountries)confirmsthatthereislittleornoriskofjoblossacrossU.S.states,citiesandtowns—anextremelystringent,andarguablyimpossible,hurdle.Aswenotebelow,thisapproachrequiresthatthelocationsthatprovidedthecrucialevidenceonemploymenteffectscouldnothaveusedabackward-lookingNJLcriterionforestablishingtheirwagefloors—ifalljurisdictionsweretorelyonanNJLrule,thehigherwagefloorsnecessaryfortestsofemploymenteffectswouldberuledoutforlackofevidence(“unchartedwaters”).Anothercriterionforsettingthewagefloorisnecessary.Inarecentdiscussionpaper,Manningmakesacompellingcasethatnegativeemploymenteffectsofmoderateminimumwagehikesare“elusive,”basedonbothareviewoftherecentstate-of-the-artevidenceandhisownevidenceforU.S.teenagersacrossstatesbetween1979and2014(Manning2016).“Evenforgroupswhereonecanestimateasizeable,robustwageeffect,theemploymenteffectishardtofind”(p.7).TheimplicationManningdrawsfromthisevidenceisthat“itisperhapstimefortheliteraturetomoveontotrytoaddressthequestionofhowhigh

31InadebatewithBernieSanders,HillaryClintonsaid,“IdotakewhatAlanKruegersaidseriously.Heistheforemostexpertinourcountryontheminimumwage,andwhatitseffectsare.ThatiswhyIsupporta$12nationalfederalminimumwage.”http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Jobs.htm32“Researchsuggeststhataminimumwagesetashighas$12anhourwilldomoregoodthanharmforlow-wageworkers,buta$15-an-hournationalminimumwagewouldputusinunchartedwaters,andriskundesirableandunintendedconsequences”(Krueger2015,p.5).Similarly,JaredBernstein,theformereconomicadvisortoVicePresidentBidenexpressedhisreservationsbyreferringtothe$15wageas“out-of-sample”:“Therecouldbequitelargesharesofworkersaffected(bya$15wage),andresearchdoesn’thavealottosayaboutthat”(NoamScheiber2015,p.A1).

Page 20: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

18

theminimumwagecanberaisedwithoutsignificantemploymenteffectsappearing”(p.3).ThisisclearlyanexampleofNJLframing,butitisonethatisconsistentwiththepossibilityofusingaggregateemploymenteffectsasthetest(assuggestedbytheresearchdesignheusedforidentifyingwageandemploymenteffectsforteens),andnotanyjoblossanywhere—animportantdistinction.Italsoopensupthepossibilityofrelyingonforward-looking(ornear-real-time)evidenceonemploymenteffectsasthewagefloorispushedup.ThishasbeentheapproachoftheU.K.’sLowPayCommission,whichwaschargedbythegovernmentwithanNJLstandard.33

Since1999theLowPayCommissionhascommissionedover130researchprojectsthathavecoveredvariousaspectsoftheimpactoftheNationalMinimumWageontheeconomy.Inthatperiodthelowpaidhavereceivedhigherthanaveragewageincreasesbuttheresearchhas,ingeneral,foundlittleadverseeffectonaggregateemployment;therelativeemploymentsharesofthelow-payingsectors;individualemploymentorunemploymentprobabilities;orregionalemploymentorunemploymentdifferences(LowPayCommission2014,p.12).

TheResolutionFoundationsimilarlyrecommendsthatthenationalminimumwageintheUnitedKingdomshouldbesetbyaforward-lookingNJLstandard:“theLPCshouldcontinuetomaketheempiricaljudgmentofthevalueatwhichtheminimumwagecanbesetwithoutemploymenteffectsyeartoyear”(ResolutionFoundation2014,p.44).TheFoundationcallsforthetargetwagefloortobesetbythevalueoftheminimumwagerelativetotheoverallmedianwageof60percent.Thegoalisexpresslynottoachievealivingwageortoeliminatelowpay,butrathertoreduce“theUnitedKingdom’shighincidenceoflowpayfrom21percentto17percent,areasonablegoalagainstinternationalbenchmarks”(p.9)withlittleornothreatofjobloss.This17percenttargetischosenbecauseitistheOECDaverage(p.36).34“Ourview,basedonU.K.andinternationalevidence,isthatawage-floorworth60percentofthemedianwageisareasonablelodestar,indicatingthemostthata33“OurannualremithastypicallyaskedtheLPCtoreachajudgmentonthelevelthatwillhelpasmanylow-paidworkersaspossible,withoutanysignificantnegativeeffectonemploymentortheeconomy”(LowPayCommission2016,p.vii).34This“lodestar”seemsastrangebasisforsettingtheU.K.wagefloor.TheaverageKaitzratioacrossOECDcountrieshasnoobviousconnectiontotheNJLthreshold,anappropriatelevelofbottom-endwagecompression(inequality),orminimallyacceptablestandardoflivingfortheU.K.workingfamilies.ThreeofthefiveOECDcountrieswiththelowest(best)incidenceoflowpayontheFoundation’sfigure,“LowPayintheOECD”(page37)arePortugal(7percent),Chile(9percent),andGreece(12percent),allfarbelowtheOECDaverageof17percent;fivecountrieswithhigherlow-wage-incidenceratesthantheaveragearePoland,Ireland,Israel,SouthKorea,andtheUnitedStates.

Page 21: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

19

minimumwagecouldcontributetothegoalofreducinglowpayoverthemediumtolongterm(p.10).35Noreasonisgivenforwhyawagefloorsetat60percentofthemedianwageistheNJLthreshold,orwhytheLPCshouldn’tgraduallyincreasethewageflooruntilsignsofintolerablelevelsofjoblossappear.Anotherleadingminimumwagescholar,ArinDube(2014),hasalsorecommendedthatthewagefloorforU.S.statesandcitiesshouldbesetrelativetothemedianwage—theKaitzratio—butunliketheLPCandtheResolutionFoundation,Dubeappearstorelyonabackward-lookingNJLstandard.Hispreferredratiois50percentofthelocalmedianwage,whichwouldbringthelegalminimumuptowhathecallsits“natural”and“appropriate”level.Dube(2014)estimatesthatiflegislatedatthestatelevel,this50percentformulawouldincreaselegalwagefloorsby26percentonaverage,reachinglevelsrangingfrom$12.45forMassachusettsto$7.97forMississippi(in2014dollars).The50percentKaitzrulewouldgeneratesubstantiallyhigherwagesthantheflat$12phased-in2020wage($10.92in2016dollars)forstateswithhighmedianwages,althoughitshouldbenotedthatmostalreadyhavehighstateminimumwages(e.g.,theMassachusettsstatewagefloorisnow$10.00).Incontrast,Dube’sproposalwouldlockinalowminimumwageanddolittletopushthelowerpartofwagedistributionuptowardthenationalaverageinstateswithlowmedianwages(suchasMississippi),whichformanyminimumwageadvocatesisoneofthemaingoalsofahigherfederalstatutorywagefloor.Aminimumwagesetat50percentofthemedianwageisnaturalandappropriate,accordingtoDube,becauseitwouldincreasethewagefloorbutposelittleornoriskofjobloss.“Overall,Ibelievethebestevidenceconcludesthatthenetimpactoftheproposedincreaseintherealstatutoryminimumwagewouldbelikelysmall,andlikelytoosmalltobemeaningfullydifferentfromzero”(ibid.p.8).Dube’sstrongestempiricalevidenceforthisclaimisthatafewstatesthathaverecentlyintroducedwagefloorsthatarejustunderthe50percentmarkhaveshownnonegativeemploymenteffects:“U.S.evidencethatsuggestssmallemploymenteffectsisbasedonanumberofstates(e.g.,Nevada,Oregon,Vermont)thathaveallraisedtheirstateminimumwagestolevelsthatsurpass46percentoftheirmedianfull-timewage”(p.9).TheexperienceoftheUnitedKingdomsince1999isalsocitedinsupportofthe50percentrule,withaKaitzIndexofaround45percent.

35AccordingtotheResolutionFoundation,“Theminimumwagecannotsimplyberaisedto66percentofthemedianwageinordertoeradicatelowpay—eveninthelongtermthisisnot(sic)kindofgtargetisrelativetotheoverallmedian,notthefull-timemedian,whichwouldbeamuchmoreambitioustarget(andonethat,forexample,France,hasalreadyachieved(seeFigure5below).

Page 22: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

20

LikeKrueger(2015)andCooperetal.(2015),Dube(2014)offersnoevidence—andindeeddoesnotcontend—thattheproposedNJLwage(inthiscase,setbythe50percentratio)marksthethresholdabovewhichthereisconsequentialandescalatingjobloss.Ifthatthresholdactuallyturnsouttobe55percent,65percentor75percent,therewouldbehugeforegonewagebenefitsforlow-wageworkersandtheircommunities,andfortheeconomyasawhole—atnocostinjobs.Thesame,ofcourse,goesforsettingthetargetat$12,withoutevidencethat$13.50,$15,or$17istheNJLthreshold.Insum,thebackward-lookingNJLruleisthereforeanecessarilyconservativecriterionbyconstruction—onethatmustbelowerthantheNJLthresholdbutbyhowmuchisunknown—potentiallyleavingagreatdealof“wagesonthetable.”b)What’sWrongwiththe‘NoJobLoss’CriterionWebrieflyoutlinesixproblemsposedbyrelyingontheNJLcriterionforsettingtheappropriatewagefloor.

1) TheStatisticalProblem:theLimitsofaPurelyStatisticalCriterion

IdentifyingtheNJLwagefloorfromeconometricevidenceisbothextremelychallengingandinherentlycontroversial.Giventhemanypartieswithbigstakesintheoutcome,relyingonastatisticallyderivedNo-Job-Lossthresholdallbutguaranteesendlessdebatesoverempiricalresearchdesign.36Forexample,Cooperetal.(2015)pointoutthattheevidencewehaveonemploymenteffectsisbasedonincreasesintheminimumwagewithinthe$6-to-$10range(althoughmostofthosetestswereinfactconductedwithreferencetowagefloorsbelow$9.00).AlthoughSchmitt(2013),Manning(2016),andmanyothershaveconvincingly(tous)concludedthatthebalanceofevidenceisthatdiscernibleemploymenteffectsofmodestincreasesinlegalwagefloorsremainelusive,manyresearcherscontinuetoargue,withcrediblestatisticalsupport,thatsizableincreases,evenjusttolevelsatthetopofthis$6-to-$10range,willcauseatleastsomejoblossinsomeestablishmentssomewhere.RequiringthatthereisevidenceofNJLtothesatisfactionofmostresearchersandinterestedpartiesleavesthesettingoftheminimumwagesubjecttotheoutcomeofastatisticalcontestoverwhosedataandresearchdesignsaremostcredible—adebateinwhichhardlyanyonecan

36Thismaybeparticularlytruegiventhenatureofsomeofthelow-wagesectors,wherethereisusuallyveryhighturnoveramongemployees,andahighfailurerateinsomeindustries.Forexample,onestudyfoundthatalmost60percentofallrestaurantscloseorchangeownershipwithintheirfirstthreeyears(Parsaetal.2005).

Page 23: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

21

meaningfullyparticipateexcepttheresearchersthemselves—seemsapoorbasisformakingpolicythatmatters.2)TheMethodologicalProblem:HowareHigherWageFloorsSetintheFirstPlace?

Asthehighestwagefloorpossiblethatposeslittleornoriskofjobloss,theNJLthresholdrequiresreal-worldevidencethatcanidentifythewagefloorabovewhichdiscerniblejoblossislikely.Butsinceitisevidence-based,withinanygivenjurisdiction(say,attheleveloftheUnitedStates),thiscriterionrulesoutthepossibilityofsettingthewagefloorsinthefirstplace.Wagefloorsmustprecedetheempiricaltestsoftheireffects.Inshort,thebackward-lookingNJLrulerequiresthatthereareplacesthatdonotsetthewagefloorwiththiscriteriontogettheevidenceforsettingawagefloorthatsatisfiestheNJLcriterion—likeSeattle,orCaliforniaandNewYorkState,orFrance,Australia,andtheUnitedKingdom.Butthatmeansthattheevidencemustcomefromlocationsthatuseothergroundsforsettingthewagefloor,likestandard-of-livingcriteria.This,inturn,meansNJLjurisdictionsarecondemnedto“followingtheleader,”oralwaysbeingyearsbehindothercountries(orlocaljurisdictions)whilewaitingforevidencethatraisingthewagefloorgenerateslittleornojobloss.Extrapolatingfromtheexperiencesofotherjurisdictionssomeyearspreviouslyraisesotherproblems.Wemustassumethatthestatisticaleffectsofawagefloorinlabormarketsinwhich,forexample,thereissupportforaMinimumLivingWage(MLW)criterion(sayAustraliaorFranceorSeattle)applytoalocationwhosesocialnormscallonlyforanNJLrule.Anevidence-basedapproachwouldneedstatisticalsupportforthisexpectation.Moregenerally,theremaybemanyotherreasonsfordoubtingwhetherolderevidencefromMLWjurisdictionscanbeexpectedtopredicteffectsofafederalminimumwageacrossthenation’sstates,counties,cities,andtowns.ItshouldbeclearthattheNJLcriterion,especiallyonethatis“backwardlooking,”cannotstandonitsownasacoherentandmeaningfulstandardforsettingthelegalwagefloor.3)The“MoneyLeftontheTable”ProblemCloselyrelated,itistellingthatneitherCooperetal.(2015),Krueger(2015),Dube(2014),orManning(2016),theResolutionFoundation(2014),northeLowPayCommission(2014,2016)citeevidencethatcrediblyidentifiestheNJLthreshold—thewagebelowwhichitisknownthatthereislittleornoriskofjoblossanywhere,

Page 24: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

22

andabovewhichthereisknowntobeariskofjoblosshighenoughtobe“notworthtaking,”asKruegerputit.Adherencetoabackward-lookingNJLcriterionprecludessettingawagefloorhighenoughtodiscoverthisthresholdbydefinition—thereisnoevidenceunlessahigherthanexistingwagefloorisset,andthisrequiressomeothercriterion.Asaresult,theNJLapproachtosettingtheminimumwagemustleave“moneyonthetable,”meaningthewagefloormustbebelowtheNJLthreshold.37

4)TheNetMonetaryBenefitsProblem:WhyisJobLosstheOnlyConsideration?TheNJLcriterionisconcernedonlywiththecostsideofanincreaseintheminimumwage.Framingthequestionthiswayensuresthatthepossibilityofcostsrelatedtojoblossnecessarilytrumpsthecertaintyofthebenefitsofwagegains,bothdirectlyfortheworkersreceivingwageincreasesandindirectlybyreducingtheneedforsocialspendinginsupportofworkingpoorfamilies.Itiswell-establishedthatiftherearenegativeemploymenteffects,theyaresmall,reflectingasteep(highlyinelastic)labordemandcurveevenfordisadvantagedteens(CardandKrueger2015;Manning2016),whichmeansthatawagehikeincreasesthetotalwagestoworkers.TheNJLstandardforsettingtheappropriatewagefloorentirelyignoresthemaintraditionaljustificationfortheminimumwage—themoral,social,economicandpoliticalbenefitsofamuchhigherstandardoflivingfromworkforlowincomeworkersandtheirfamilies.

5)TheEquityandEfficiencyProblems:WhyShouldn’tFairnessandSystem-WideWelfareGainsCount?

TheNJLcriterionfailstotakeintoaccountthefundamentalethicalandefficiencyjustificationsthathavemotivatedlivingwageadvocatessinceatleastthe19thcentury.Thesejustificationscanbeusefullyexpressedintheformofthreearguments:sustainability,capability,andexternality(Stabile2008;WernerandLim2015).Onbothhumandignityandeconomicefficiencygrounds,workersshouldbeabletosustainthemselvesandtohavetheopportunitytodosofromemploymentratherthanfromeithertax-basedredistributionorprivatecharity.Thecapabilityargumentextendsthatofsustainability.AsRyan(1912,p.73)argued,thewage

37Aforward-lookingNJLrule,byallowingaregularincreaseintherealandrelativewageflooruntilthereisactualevidenceofjobloss,couldproducethisthreshold,andbyknowingit,wecouldthencalculatethetheforegonewagesattributabletobackward-lookingNJLframing.

Page 25: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

23

shouldbehighenoughtomeetthe“minimumconditionsofrightandreasonableliving,”whichisnecessarytoa“lifeworthyofahumanbeing”(WernerandLim2015,p.5).Theaffronttohumandignitydimensionisbestexpressedinthewordsofworkersthemselves.Thefollowingisanonymous,from1935.

Themostsurprisingdayeverseeninthisplacewasyesterdaywhenthebosswasorderedtopayusthecoderate…Youcanguessthemoneyishandy.Butthereissomethingmorethanthemoney.Thereisknowingthattheworkingmandon’tstandaloneagainstthebossesandtheirsmartlawyersandalltheirtricks.Thereisagovernmentnowthatcareswhetherthingsisfairforus.Itellyouthatismorethanmoney.Itgivesyouagoodfeelinginsteadofallthetimeburningupbecausenothingisfair(Waltman2004,p.183).

FollowingSen(1999)andStabile(2008),WernerandLim(2015)addamoreinstrumentalargument,onethattiesmoralitytoefficiency:adecentwageisnecessaryfor“people’scapabilitiesinregardtothefunctionstheyhaveasmembersofsocietyandasworkers,andtotheirabilitytoenhancecapabilitiesintheirchildren.”Althoughoftenneglectedinthecurrentdebate(butwascommoninthelivingwagediscussionacenturyago),thereisalsoapowerfulefficiencycaseforaMinimumLivingWage(MLW)onexternalitygrounds.Awagethatfailstomeetminimalthresholdsforsustainabilityandcapabilitymeansthatemployersareimposingsocialcostsonthenation,whichiswhySidneyWebbreferredtopaymentofbelowsubsistencewagesasa“viciousformofparasitism”(Webb,1912;seealsothequotebyRooseveltonthetitlepage).UsinglanguagelikeSidneyandBeatriceWebb,theU.S.SupremeCourtstatedthefollowingintheirmajorityopinioninWestCoastHotelv.Parrish(1937)that:

Denialofalivingwageisnotonlydetrimentaltotheirhealthandwellbeing,butcastsadirectburdenfortheirsupportonthecommunity.Whattheseworkersloseinwagesthetaxpayersarecalledupontopay.Thebarecostoflivingmustbemet.….Thecommunityisnotboundtoprovidewhatisineffectasubsidyforunconscionableemployers(QuotedinAnker2011,p.78).

Inadditiontoadrainongovernmentresources,employerspayinglowwagescoulddrivedownwagesinotherindustries.ACongressionalResearchServicereportontheFLSAnotes:

Page 26: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

24

Atthetimeoftheact’spassage,Congressfoundthatafewemployerswhopaidsubstandardwagescausedadecreaseinwageswithintheirrespectiveindustries,becauseotheremployerssoughttocompeteinthemarketplacewithlowerpricedgoods.Congressalsofoundthatthesedecreasedwagescausedone-thirdoftheU.S.populationtobe“ill-nourished,ill-clad,andill-housed(CongressionalResearchService2013,p.1).

ThecaseforrelianceonaNJLcriterionwouldhavetorestonthebeliefthatthecostsofjoblosswouldmorethanoffsettheethicalandefficiencybenefitsofahigherwagefloor.Thisisthedebatethatisneeded.6)ThePublicPolicyStraitjacketProblem:ASpecialHurdleforLow-WageWorkers?

ThefinalproblemconcernstheimplicationsoftheNJLcriterionforpolicymaking.Requiringthatanewpolicymustpassthishurdleasestablishedbytheagreementamong“experts”regardingthestatisticalevidencewouldeffectivelyruleoutmanynewpoliciesandregulations.Fromahistoricalperspective,strictadherencetosuchacriterionforpolicymakingwouldhavemadeitimpossibletopassahostofregulationsandpoliciesthathaveemploymenteffects,suchaschildlaborlaws,occupationalhealthandsafetyregulations,andenvironmentalregulations.Insum,muchofthepolicydebateovertheappropriateleveloftheminimumwagehasbeenconductedasiftheonlyrealquestionisoverthewagefloorthatposeslittleornoriskofjobloss.Butasamatterofstatisticalpractice,thisisnearlyimpossibletoestablish;itfailsmethodologicallyasageneralcriterionforsettingwagefloorsbecausegeneratingtherequiredevidencerequiresthathigherthanexistingwagefloorsmustbeset,whichinturnrequiressomeothercriterion;itisbyconstructionconservative,likelytoleavemuch“moneyonthetable”;itentirelyignoresthenetbenefitsofawagethatmaycausesomejoblossbutiscertaintoproducefarlargerbenefitsintheformofhigherwageincomes;itignoresimportantequityandefficiencyconsiderations;anditrepresentsanextraordinarilyconservativeruleforpolicymakingthatiftakenseriouslyoverthecourseofthelastcenturywouldruleoutmuchofthesocialregulationthatcurrentlygovernsU.S.society.5.IdentifyingtheNJLThreshold:WhatRolefortheMedianWage?Whileaforward-lookingNJLrulewouldnotgenerateawagefloorthatmaximizesnetmonetarybenefitstolow-wageworkers,muchlessoverallbenefits(accounting

Page 27: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

25

ethicalandefficiencyconsiderations),itwouldatleastoffertheprospectofidentifyingtheNJLthreshold.Forthispurpose,itwouldbeusefultohaveasimplemetricthatcouldbeusedtopredictjoblossinresponsetoaminimumwageincrease.ManyhavepointedtotheKaitzIndex—theratiooftheminimumwagetothemedian(orsomeotheraverage)—asjustsuchametric.Itisausefulmeasureoftherelativegenerosityand“bite”oftheminimumwage:thecloserthewageflooristothemedian,themorecompressedthebottomofthewagedistribution,andthelargerwillbethenumber(andshare)ofworkersaffected.Inthedebateovertheminimumwage,ithasbeenashortstepfromtheuseofthisratiotomeasuretherelative“bite”oftheminimumwage,toitsuseasareliableguidetotheriskofjobloss.TheheavyrelianceontheKaitzindexintheCooperetal.andDubepapers,andbytheResolutionFoundationandLowPayCommissionintheUnitedKingdom,illustratethegreatappealofthissimplemetric.ButisitameaningfulguideforsettingtheNJLwagefloor?Wethinknot.Asnotedabove,thedeterminantsofwage-setting,andconsequentlythedynamicsofthewage-employmentrelationship,arecomplexandvaryacrossestablishments,firms,industrysectors,andregions.Itisnotjustthechangeinthelaborshareofoperatingcoststhatmatters(whichwillbedeterminednotjustbythewageincreasesbutalsobyrelatedchangesinproductivityandturnovercosts),buttheabilitytoaccommodatethesechanges,whichwilldependontheelasticityofproductdemand,changesinconsumerdemandandemployerprofitability(andwhatisviewedbyemployerstobean“acceptable”levelofprofitability),andallthesefactorswillallbeimpactedbyprevailingsocialnorms.Themedianwage,definedbysomegeographicarea,notonlyfailstocapturethesecriticaldimensionsofwageandemploymentsetting,butisalsoinherentlyproblematicasausefulguidebecauseitwillvarywiththejurisdictionallevel(reflectingtherelevantgeographicarea’smedianwage),whichislikelytobelargelyindependentofthefactorsthatdeterminetheemploymenteffectsofamandatedwageforverylow-wageworkers.Ahelpfultheoreticaljustificationforthemedianwageasaguidetothe(presumed)tradeoffbetweenwagesandemploymentwouldneedtoexplainwhichreferencewage(overallmedianormean?forallworkersorjustfull-timeworkers?forhourlywageworkers?forteenageworkers?)andwhichjurisdictionallevel(nation,state,county,city,town,neighborhood?)wouldbetherightonesforidentifyingboththeNJLthresholdandthelikelyemploymenteffectsofwagefloorsabovethethreshold.a) TheKaitzIndexandtheLow-WageEmploymentDecision

Page 28: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

26

Weknowofnosuchatheoreticaljustificationintheliterature,butDube’s“Proposal13:DesigningThoughtfulMinimumWagePolicyattheStateandLocalLevels”(Dube2014)offerssomearguments.HegivesthefollowingexplanationfortheusefulnessoftheKaitzindexasaguideforsettingthestatutorywagefloorandforwhya50-percentratioisthemostappropriate.

Therearethreereasonstopayattentiontothismeasure,especiallyusingthemedianasthereferencewage.First,acomparisonoftheminimumwagetothemedianoffersaguideforhowbindingaparticularminimumwageincreaseislikelytobe,andwhattypeofwagethelabormarketcanbear…ahighratio—sayaround.8—indicatesahighlyinterventionistpolicywheretheminimumwageisdramaticallycompressingdifferencesinwagesfornearlyhalftheworkforce.Second,thiscomparisonalsoprovidesuswithanaturalbenchmarkforjudginghowhighorlowaminimumwageisacrosstimeperiodsoracrosscountriesthatvaryintermsoftheirlabormarketsandwagedistributions.Third,themedianwagealsoprovidesanaturalreferencepointforjudgingwhatisareasonableminimumwagelevels:nooneexpectsthattheminimumwageshouldbesetequaltothemedianwage,butfairnessmaybecomeafactorwhentheminimumwagefallsbelow,say,one-fourthorone-fifthofthemedianwage(Dube2011,p.2).

Reason#1ispresumablythemostimportant,anditiscertainlytruethattheratio“offersaguideforhowbindingaparticularminimumwageislikelytobe.”Butthisis(almost)truebydefinition—ahigherminimumwagewilltendtoaffectmoreworkers—andshortofagoodtheoryorcompellingempiricalevidence,thisalonetellsuslittleabout“whattypeofwagethelabormarketcanbear.”Dubereferstotwoextremeexamples,butnoreasonisgivenforwhyweshouldbeconfidentthata20-percentKaitzratiowillnotcausediscerniblejobloss,whilean80-percentratiowillsurelygenerateunacceptablylargejoblosses,orforthatmatter,why50percentistherightratio.Reason#2istheclaimthattheKaitzindexisausefulmetricforcomparisonsoftherelativevalueofthewageflooracrossjurisdictionsandovertime.Thisiscertainlytrue,butitisnotareasonforrelyingonthisindicatorasagoodguidetotheriskofjobloss,muchlessasthemeansforidentifyingaparticularNJLwagethreshold.Reason#3appealstowhatis“natural,”“reasonable,”and“fair,”butdoesnottelluswhatmakesaparticularratenatural,reasonableandfair.Isthepreferred50-percentrationaturalandreasonablebecauseitreflectsafair(equitable)degreeofwagecompression(bottom-endwageinequality)orbecauseitistheratioatwhich

Page 29: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

27

therewillbenojobloss,orboth?HowdoweknowthatwhatisviewedtobefairandwhatturnsouttobetheNJLthresholdwillbethesameacrossjurisdictionsasdifferentastheUnitedStatesandFrance,MississippiandMassachusetts,ormetropolitanMiamiandSanFrancisco?Todemonstratewhathis50-percentproposalwouldmeanatthelocallevel,Dubepresentstablesthatshowthe“targetminimumwage”generatedbya50-percentKaitzratioforstatesandselectedmetropolitanareas.Totakejustoneexample,accordingtoDube’sTable13.1,thewagefloorshouldbe$12.25fortheNewYork-Newark-JerseyCitymetropolitanarea.Butifthemedianisagoodbenchmarkonequityandjoblossgrounds,thenNewark’stargetwagefloorshouldbefarlowerthanManhattan’s:becauseNewark’smedianwageismuchlowerthanManhattan’s,a50-percentKaitzratiowouldrequireamuchlowerlegalwagefloorforNewark.Inshort,implementingthe50-percentKaitzruleattheleveloftheNewYorkmetropolitanareamustwillleadtojoblossinNewJerseyifthisratioisagoodapproximationfortheNJLthreshold.Onthissameassumption,usingauniformKaitzratiotosetwagefloorsatthestatelevelwouldlikelyposeevengreaterthreatsoflocaljobloss.Ataminimum,thisexamplesuggeststhattheKaitzratiowouldbeexpectedtodoabetterjobasapredictorofjoblossthesmallerthejurisdictionalunit.Butifthat’srightthenwhatmakesNewarktherightgeographicunit?Toextendtheexample,wecanbesurethatNewark’smedianwagewillbeaffectedbychangesinthecompositionofNewark’semploymentbase.Let’ssaythatabigincreasetakesplaceintheshareofbigheathcarefacilities,nonprofitorganizations,andgovernmentagenciesthathaverelativelyhighwages.Withthisgrowth,thecity’scity’smedianwagewillincrease,causingtheratiooftheminimumwagetothemedianwagetofallandconsequentlysowillitsKaitzratio—let’ssayfromtheoriginal50percenttothe37percent,the2014figurefortheentirecountry.Tomaintainthe50-percentrule,Newark’swagefloorwouldhavetobeincreased.Butthereisnoobviousreasonwhythesecitywideshiftsinemploymentcompositionshouldmakeitpossibleforinnercityretailshopsandfastfoodrestaurantsthatcatertoneighborhoodcustomerscaneasilyadjusttothenew,higherminimumwage.Inthisscenario,the50-percentKaitzratioshouldbeappliedtosubsectionsofNewark,leadingtodifferentwagefloorswithinthecity’sboundaries.ThisillustratesthepotentialimpracticalityofusingaparticularKaitzratiotoachieveanNJLwagefloor.3838IftheKaitzindexprovestobebetterperformingasaguidetojoblossatsmallerjurisdictionallevelsthenthechallengethenbecomesthefeasibilityofupdatingthelocalKaitzratioandthereforethelocalminimumwageasthereferencemedianwagechanges.Thereisalsotheobviousinefficiency

Page 30: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

28

Inshort,themedianwageseemsapoorguidetosettinganappropriatelegalwagefloor—onethatishighenoughtomakeadifferencebutnotonethatrisksjobloss.Athought-experimentthatextendsthisdiscussiononthedifficultiesposedbyageographicallydefinedKaitzindexforsettingthewagefloorappearsintheAppendix.b) ImplicationsoftheCross-CountryEvidence

Withouttheory,orevenstrongintuition,forwhyaparticularKaitzratiowoulddoagoodjobofidentifyinganNJLwagefloor,itsusefulnessisanempiricalquestion.Wewillfocusonthecross-countryevidencefromtheOECD,whichillustrateshowwidelyvaryingtheKaitzratiois,bothovertimeandacrosscountries.FocusingmainlyonacomparisonoftheUnitedStates,France,andAustralia,weshowthatthereislittleevidenceofalinkbetweentheKaitzindexandemploymentperformance.Thatis,countriesthathavechosentosetthelegalwageflooratahighlevelrelativetothemedianwage(FranceandAustralia)donotshowsystematicallyhigherunemploymentrates,orloweremploymentrates,thantheUnitedStates.Nordoweobservethepredicteddivergenceovertime:astheKaitzratiohasrisentoover60percentforFranceandAustraliawhilefallingtoaround37percentfortheUnitedStates,thepredictedwideninggapinemploymentperformancedoesnotappearinthedata.Wealsocomparetheincidenceoflowpayandemploymentperformanceacrosscountries.Asthelegalwagefloorincreasesrelativetothemedian—ahigherKaitzindex—thebottomofthewagedistributioniscompressed,leadingtolowerbottom-endinequality(wagedispersion)aswellasalowerincidenceoflowpay.Theconventionaldefinitionofthelowpaythresholdis2/3ofthemedianwage—theconventionaldefinitionoflowpay.AhigherKaitzratiowillreducetheincidenceoflowpayastheminimumwageconvergestothelow-paythreshold.Wealsofindnocorrespondencebetweentheincidenceoflowpayandtheemploymentrateofyounglesseducatedworkers.Figure5showsthesameseriesalongwithKaitzratiosfortheUnitedStates(Figure3)andfourotherrichcountries.Sincethemid-1980stheUnitedStateshasheldthelowestposition.By2014,theU.S.ratioofthewagefloortothemedianwagewasonly37percentcomparedto61percentforFrance,53percentforAustralia,48percentfortheUnitedKingdom,and45percentforCanada.Thisfigureshowsthatandunfairnessofstatutorywagefloorsthatvaryacrossneighborhoods,fromcitytocity,andacrossstatesthatsharethesamemetropolitanarea,asinthecaseofmetropolitanNewYork.

Page 31: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

29

whileFrancemaintaineditscommitmenttoahighandrisingwagefloor,theUnitedStatestooktheoppositepath.Figure5:TheRatiooftheMinimumWagetotheMedianWage(“KaitzRatio”)forFiveCountries,1960-2014

Source:OECD.stat(dataextractedJanuary2016)AsimilarpatternisshowninFigure6fortheminimumwageintermsoftheabsolutevalueoftheminimumwage,withFigure6areportingpurchasingpower(usingtheOECD’sindexofpurchasingpowerparity)andFigure6bshowingthevalueintermsofexchangerates.BothmethodsofvaluingtheminimumwageputAustraliaandFrancefarabovetheothercountries,withtheUnitedStatesatthebottom.TheperformanceofAustraliaisparticularlynotable,inthatitillustratesthesensitivityoftheKaitzindextochangesinthevalueofnotjusttheminimumwage(thenumerator)butthemedianwage(thedenominator).Figure5reportsafairlystrongdeclineintheAustralianKaitzratio,fromwellabovetowellbelowthatofFrance.ButasFigures6aand6bshow,thebuyingpowerofAustralia’sminimumwage(howevermeasured)hascontinuedtoincrease;thereasonforthedeclineintheKaitzindexshowninFigure5isnotbecausethegovernmentfailedtoraisethevalueofthewagefloor(perhapsforfearofjobloss?),butbecausethemedianwageincreasedevenfaster.ThisunderscoresthepotentialdifficultyofrelyingonafixedKaitzratioastheNJLtarget,asproposedbyDube(2014),theU.K.government(LowPayCouncil2016)andtheResolutionFoundation(2014).

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

France

Australia

United:Kingdom

Canada

United:States

Page 32: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

30

Figure6:TheValueoftheNationalMinimumWagesforFiveCountriesinConstantUSDollars(2014),1960-2014a.Measuredin2014constantpricesusingUSDollarPurchasingPowerParities(OECD)

b.Measuredin2014constantpricesusing2014USDexchangerates(OECD)

Australia

Canada

France

UK

US

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Australia

Canada

France

UK

US

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

$14

$16

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Page 33: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

31

Source:OECD.stat(dataextractedMay2016)FranceandAustraliaofferagoodexamplesofnationalcommitmenttoaMinimumLivingWage.InthecaseofFrance,theminimumwagewasestablishedanddesignedtopromotesocialinclusionthroughemployment.AsCaroliandGautie(2008,p.18)explain,theFrenchminimumwagereflects“apoliticalandsocialconsensusaccordingtowhichadecentwageshouldbedefinednotonlyinabsolutebutalsoinrelativetermsandthuslowwagesshouldbenefitfromgrowthandbeindexedtotheaveragewageincrease.”Likewise,accordingtotheWorkplaceRelationsActof1996,thegoaloftheAustralianminimumwageistoensurea“fair”wage,judgedaccordingtolivingstandards“generallyprevailingintheAustraliancommunity”(Healy2011,p.633).

Accordingtotheconventionalwisdom,Francehaspaidaheavypriceforthiscommitmenttoeradicatingextremelowpay,intheformofalong-runworseningofemploymentoutcomesforyoung,less-educatedworkers,especiallyrelativetocountrieswithacommitmenttoflexible,lessregulatedlabormarketssuchastheUnitedStates.Butthedatasuggestotherwise.Torecap,whilebothcountrieshadaKaitzindexofaround45percentto47percentinthelate1970s,bythemid-2000s,theFrenchratiohadrisenabove60percentandtheU.S.ratiohadfallento31percent.TheU.S.-Francegapwasequallymassiveinrealpurchasingvalues:astheU.S.minimumwagefellfromaround$9.50to$7.25,theFrenchminimumwagerosefrom$7.00to$11.00(in2014dollars-Figure6a).Hastheopeningofa25percentagepointgapintheKaitzindexforFranceandtheUnitedStates—onethatisreinforcedbyabuyingpowergapthathasreached$3.75—ledtoadivergenceinemploymentandunemploymentratesforthemostvulnerableworkersinthesetwocountries?Figure7ashowsthattheconventionallydefinedunemploymentrateforyoungworkers(ages15to24)wasmuchhigherinFrancethanintheUnitedStatesinthemid-1980sandmid-1990s(theheightoftheEuropeanrecession).However,thisgapnarroweddramaticallyinthe2000s,andespeciallyduringthe2008-10financialcrisis,whiletherelativevaluesoftheFrenchandU.S.minimumwagescontinuedtosharplydiverge.Withtheexceptionof2011to2013(inpartareflectionofthecommitmenttoEuropeaneconomicausteritypolicies)thereisnoevidenceofasecularwideninggap,aswouldbeexpectediftheKaitzindexwasagoodpredictorofemploymentperformanceforthemostvulnerableworkers.

Page 34: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

32

Figure7:AlternativeUnemploymentRates(U/LFandU/POP)forAges15-24,1983-2014*a.TheUSandFrance

b.TheUSandAustralia

*U/LFisthestandardunemploymentrateandistheratiooftheunemployedtothelaborforcefor15-24yearolds;U/POPistheratiooftheunemployedtothepopulationfortheseages.Source:OECD.stat(dataextractedJanuary2016).Figure7aalsoshowsthattheorthodoxpredictionofdivergingU.S.andFrenchemploymentperformancefaresevenworseifabettermeasureofyouthunemploymentisused.Theconventionalmeasureisdefinedastheunemployedshareofthelaborforce(theunemployedplustheemployed).ButunlikeU.S.students,moststudentsinFrancedonotwork,andthisisnotsimplyareflectionof

U/LFUS

U/POPUS

U/LFFR

U/POPFR

5

10

15

20

25

30

1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

%

U/LFUS

U/POPUS

U/LFAUS

U/POPAUS

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

%

Page 35: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

33

theabsenceofjobopportunities.Thesamewastrueinthe1960s,whentheFrencheconomywasatnear-fullemployment(HowellandOkatenko,2010).Withloweremployment,thesamenumberofunemployedwilltranslateintoahigherunemploymentrate,byconstruction.Amuchbettermeasureofunemploymentforyoungpeopleistheunemployment-to-populationrate,whichisshownforFrenchandAmerican15to24yearoldsatthebottomofFigure7.TheseFrenchandU.S.unemploymentrateshavetrackedeachothercloselysincethe1980s,bothfluctuatingbetween6percentto10percent.ThereisclearlynoevidenceofthepredicteddivergenceinFrench-U.S.employmentperformance.Figure7bpresentsthesameunemploymentdatafor15-24yearoldsintheUnitedStatesandcomparesthemtoAustralia.LikeFrance,Figures5,6aand6bshowhigh,andinthecaseofFigures6aand6b,stronglyrisinginflationadjustedvaluesoftheAustralianminimumwage.ThisshouldhaveledtohigheranddivergingunemploymentratesforAustraliarelativetotheUnitedStates.ButFigure7boffersnosupportforthisconventionalprediction:TheAustralianconventionalunemploymentrate(U/LF)fellsharplybetweentheearly1990sandtheglobal2008economiccrisis,tolevelsbelowtheUnitedStates.Asimilarpatterncanbeseenusingunemployment-to-populationrates.Themostrecentdatashownearlyidenticalyouthunemploymentratesonbothmetrics(despitetheeffectsofacollapseincommoditypricesontheAustralianeconomysince2012).Figure8:TheIncidenceofLowPayand2015EmploymentRatesforYoung(25-34)Less-EducatedWorkersfor17Countries

Sources:OECD“LowPayIncidence”dataextractedfromOECD.Stat,June1,2016,andarefor2013excepttheNetherlands(2006),France(2005),andNorway(2009),whicharefromSchmitt (2012);

USUK

CA

IRE

GER

NL

AUT

SP

AUS

POR

DEN

GRE

NZ

FRFNL

NOR

ITBEL

40.00

45.00

50.00

55.00

60.00

65.00

70.00

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

LowEdu

EmployRate

LowWageShares

Page 36: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

34

theloweducationemploymentrateisfor25-34yearoldswithlessthanuppersecondaryschooling,(EO-OECD2015,tableE).AnotherperspectiveonFrench,AustralianandU.S.employmentperformanceisprovidedbyFigure8,whichshowsascatterplotofthelow-wageshareofemploymentagainstthelow-educationemploymentrate.Ahigherminimumwage,togetherwithhigherratesofcollectivebargaining(amongotherfactors)explaincross-countrydifferencesintheincidenceoflowpay.Ifthese“labormarketrigidities”priceworkersoutofthelabormarket,thenreducingthelow-wageshareshouldalsoreducetheloweducationemploymentrate,asyounglesseducatedworkershaveahardertimefindingandkeepingjobs.ButFigure8showsnocross-countryrelationshipbetweentheincidenceoflowpayandthelow-educationemploymentrate.Indeed,whilethereisa14percentagepointgapinthelow-wageshareofemploymentbetweenFrance(11percent)andtheUnitedStates(25percent),theemploymentratesforyounglesseducatedworkersisnearlythesame.Similarly,Australia’sincidenceoflowpayis9percentagepointsbelowtheU.S.level,butwithlow-educationemploymentratesabout7pointshigher.WehavealsohighlightedDenmark,whichshowsthestrongestchallengetotheorthodoxprediction—alow-wageshareofemploymentofjust8percent,17pointsbelowthe25percentrateoftheUnitedStates,butDenmarkstillshowsasuperiorlow-educationemploymentrateforyoungworkers.RelyingonabroadermeasureofhowtheFrenchandU.S.economiesperformforyoungworkers,Figure9comparestheNEETrate(NotinEmployment,EducationorTraining)for20-to-24yearolds.Ifyoungpeoplenotattendingschoolare“pricedout”ofthelabormarketbyahighminimumwagethenweshouldexpectaveryhighandrisingNEETrateforFrancecomparedtotheUnitedStates.Figure8showsthatFrancehasonlyslightlyhigherNEETratesthantheUnitedStates,andthegaphasclosedsignificantlysince2000,from3.2pointsin2000(17.6percentforFranceand14.4percentfortheUnitedStates)tojust0.6points(19.4percentcomparedto18.8percent).WhiletheFrenchNEETrateincreasedby1.8pointsoverthese13years,theU.S.rateincreasedby4.4points.Again,basedonthelevelsandchangeintherelativevalueoftheminimumwage,fromaconventionaltextbookperspectiveweshouldbeseeingdivergence,notconvergence.Insum,thiscross-countryevidenceoffersnosupportfortheconventionalviewthatahighrelativevalueofthelegalwagefloor(theKaitzindex)offersagoodguidetotheabilityofaneconomyto“afford”amuchhigherwagefloor(whethersetbuya

Page 37: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

35

statutoryminimumwageorbycollectivebargaining).IftheKaitzratioturnsouttobeagoodbenchmark,itwouldhavetobeintheregionwellabove60percent.39Figure9:TheShareofFrenchandAmerican20-24YearOldsNotEmployed,EnrolledinSchool,orinTraining(the“NEETRate”),2000and2013

Source:OECD(2015),Table3.4.c) TheSector-LevelKaitzIndex:ABetterNJLMetric?

WhilethemedianwageforageographicareaseemsapoorguidetosettinganNJLwagefloor,abetterjobmightbedonebyusingthemedianwageforanarrowlydefinedlow-wagesector(suchasretailtradeorfoodservices),becausetheconditionsfacingemployersthatmatterforthewage-employmentrelationshipmaybefairlysimilar.TheexperienceoftheUnitedKingdomspeaksdirectlytothequestionofhowhightheKaitzratiocanbeinthelow-wagesectorswheremostminimumwageworkersareemployed.Table1showsthatthecountry’sNationalMinimumWage(NMW)-to-medianratioinalllow-payingsectorsincreasedfrom67.5percentin1999to80.2percentin2015(secondtolastrow).Forspecificsectors,overthese16yearstheNMW-to-medianratiorosefrom81.9percentto92.5percentincleaning,from78.6percentto88.1percentinhospitality,andfrom69.5percentto79.5percentinretail.This

39ItshouldbenotedthatwearereferringtotheOECD’sKaitzratios,whicharemeasuredbythefull-timemedian, amore stringent standard than the targetsproposedby theUKgovernment and theUK’sResolutionFoundationforawagefloorthatis60percentoftheoverallmedian.

17.6

14.4

19.4 18.8

0

5

10

15

20

25

NEET. France NEET.U.S.

2000

2013

+1.8 +4.4

Page 38: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

36

verysubstantialwagecompressionoccurredwithoutevidenceofnegativeemploymenteffects(LowPayCommission,2014,p.12).ThisevidenceindicatesthattheNJLKaitzratioforlow-payingsectorsintheUnitedKingdomisabove80percent,the2015value.Howmuchabove?HadtheLowWageCommissionadoptedthebackward-looking“unchartedwaters”NJLcriterion,evidencewouldhavebeenrequiredtoconfirmthateachoftheseincreasessince1999wouldnottriggerjobloss.Intheabsenceofsuchevidence,wewouldnotknowthattheseincreasesintheNMW-to-medianratioof10-to-15percentagepointscouldtakeplacewithoutanyjobloss,muchlesslarge-scalejobloss(aswaspredictedinthe1990s)—andmanyU.K.workerswouldbemuchworseoffasaconsequence.40Table1:TheUK’sKaitzRatioforLow-WageSectors,1999-2013Sector 1999 2008 2012 2013 2014 2015 Highestbite

Cleaning 81.9 90.1 93.5 92.5 92.7 92.5 93.5 2012Hospitality 78.6 85.3 86.9 88.1 87.7 87.7 88.1 2013Hairdressing 83.5 80.4 85.8 84.4 85.1 86.7 86.7 2015Childcare - 69.6 82.8 84.2 83.7 84.8 84.8 2015Retail 69.5 76.7 79.5 78.1 79.4 79.1 79.5 2012Socialcare 60.8 72.2 76.8 78.4 78.7 79.5 79.5 2015Agriculture 67.5 71.7 75.1 71.8 72.1 73.2 75.1 2012Textiles 62.1 69.9 71.7 71.0 71.0 73.0 73.0 2015Leisure 59.3 66.8 69.5 70.8 71.1 72.1 72.1 2015Employmentagencies

- 67.7 68.0 68.1 71.5 70.4 71.5 2014

Foodprocessing 55.6 65.2 70.4 68.4 70.0 72.2 72.2 2015

Low-payingsectors 67.5 75.5 79.4 78.9 79.6 80.2 80.2 2015

Nonlow-payingsectors

42.2 45.6 46.0 45.9 46.2 47.0 47.0 2015

All 47.1 51.2 52.8 52.5 53.2 54.1 54.1 2015

40AccordingtotheUK’sLowPayCommission(2014),itispossiblethattheremaystillberoomforhigherincreasesinthelow-paysectorKaitzratioswithoutriskofjoblossifthenationalminimumwageisincreasedgradually.“Thebite(Kaitzratio)isatornearitshighesteverlevelinthesesectors.AgainstthatbackgroundourviewisthatintheseconditionsanincreaseintheNMWsuchastocausealargeriseinthebitewouldrunahighriskofadverseemploymenteffects.Thatriskwouldbemoreacuteifanincreaseweretotakeplaceveryquickly:theevidencefrompastincreasesintheNMWisthattimetoadjustbusinesspracticeinordertomanageadditionalwagecostshasbeenimportantinenablingemployerstocope.Wecontinuetoreceiveadvicefromemployersthataverybigrisethattakesplaceinonegowouldbethehardestforthemtoabsorb”(LowPayCommission2014,pp.31-2).

Page 39: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

37

Source:LowPayCommission(2016).TheResolutionFoundationestimatesthattheincreaseinthebitefromtheNMWin2014totheNationalLivingWage(NLW)in2020wouldbefrom83percentto98percentintheretailtradesector,from93percentto110percentinaccommodationsandfoodservices,andfrom85percentto101percentincleaningservices.41Theincreaseinthewagebillofthesethreesectorsisestimatedtobe2percent,3.4percent,and3percentrespectively.Evenintheselabor-intensivesectors(becausethewagebillisonlyapartoftotaloperatingcosts)onlyafractionofthis2-to-3.4percentwageincreaserangeneedstobeaccommodated,andasboththeLowPayCommissionandtheResolutionFoundationhaveindicated,U.K.employershaveshownthattheycanrespondnotnecessarilyoronlybycuttinghoursandjobs,butalsoviapriceincreases,reducedturnovercosts,higherproductivity,andlowerprofits(D’ArcyandCorlett2015,Table1).Insum,theexpectedchangeinthewagebillafterlikelyadjustmentstocopewithamandatoryincreaseinthewagefloorisamuchbetterguidetoexpectedjoblossthantherelativemedianwage.ButiftheKaitzindexistobeusedastheguide,itisprobablybestcalculatedatthesectorlevelinappropriatelocalities.TheU.K.evidencesuggeststhatveryhighsector-levelKaitzratiosareconsistentwithlittleornojobloss.6.TheFederalWageFloor:AMinimumLivingWage

Everyworkershouldbeensuredaminimumwagewhichwillenablehimorhertomaintainabecomingstandardoflifeforhimselfandhisfamily.ApartaltogetherfromconsiderationsofhumanityitisonthehighestinteresttotheStatethatchildrenshouldbebroughtupunderconditionsthatwillmakethemfitandefficientcitizens.BritishPrimeMinisterLloydGeorge,191942

41TheestimatedratiosoftheNLWtothesectormediancanbeover100percentbecausetheFoundationdidnotestimatethefuturemedian;theobjectivewasonlytoshowthechangefromtheNMWbitein2014towhatitwouldbein2016and2020undertheNLWwithoutchangingthemedian.ButclearlytheNLWwouldcontinuetheconvergenceoftheoftheKaitzratiotowards1inverylow-wagesectors.42QuotedbyWaldman(TheIncidenceofLowPayand2015EmploymentRatesforYoung(25-34)Less-EducatedWorkersfor17Countries2004,p.196).

Page 40: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

38

Theconcernoverjoblosshasalwaysplayedacentralroleintheminimumwagedebate,butuntilrecentlytheunderlyingmotivationwasthatexpressedin1919byLloydGeorge(above)andintheopeningsentencesofthe1938FairLaborStandardsActasnotedabove.Andintheolderrhetoric,patriciannationalpoliticalleaderscouldspeakofthe“nationalevil”ofthepaymentofpoverty-levelwages(Churchill)andthatfirmsthatdidsohad“norighttocontinueinthiscountry”(Roosevelt).43Itisnotablethatthisearlierframingtookplaceinaperiodwithvirtuallynosocialsafetynetandnojobprotectioninextremelycompetitivelabormarkets.AnymandatedwagefloorcouldbeexpectedtoresultinjoblossinU.S.andU.KeconomiesthatwerestrugglingwithasurpluspooloflaborthatthatproducedwhattheU.S.economistJohnBatesClarkcalled“hungerdiscipline.”Thisearly20thcenturydebatewasframedintermsofalivingwage.Bycontrast,intoday’sdebate,inacontextofmuchlowerunemploymentandsubstantiallygreatersocialprotection(howeverinadequate),thediscourseisdominatedbywhatthestatisticalevidencesaysabouttheeffectsofincreasesinthestatutorywageflooronjobloss.Withthebestevidencenowshowingnodiscernibleemploymenteffects,manyofthestrongestadvocatesforsubstantialhikesintheU.S.federalminimumwagehavemadethecaseonNoJobLoss(NJL)grounds.Indeed,theargumentisthatnotonlywillworkersnotlosejobs,buttherewillbelittleornoharmdonetoanyone—aperfectexampleoftheeconomist’s(near)Pareto-improvement:manygainalotandnooneloses.Settingasidethemeritsofthisview,whatisstrikingaboutthisframingisthattheultimateprogressivegoal(alivingwage)andthestrongRooseveltianrhetoricinsupportofithasallbutdisappeared.Thisleavesthecaseforminimumwagethatcanmeaningfullyimprovethelivingstandardsofworkingfamiliessubjecttothevagariesofthestatisticalanalysisovertheriskthatsomepoverty-wagehigh-turnoverjobswilldisappear,withnoplaceinthepolicydebatefortheethicalandefficiencypayoffsthatusedtobefrontandcenter.Inthissection,wesuggestthatethicalandefficiencyconsiderationsshouldbereintroducedtothedebate.Theprogressivecaseforasubstantialincreaseintheminimumwageshouldbereorientedfroma“no-harm”(NJL)framingtoabenefit-basedonethatexplicitlycallsforaMinimumLivingWageonbroadlydefinednet-benefitgrounds,whichincludenotjustthenetmonetarybenefitsofahigherwageforthestandardoflivingofworkingfamilies,butalsothemanypositivespillovereffectsofa“high-road”employmentmodel.Decentpayhelpsworkingfamiliesavoiddependenceonpublicspendingthatisstigmatizingandpoliticallydivisive,and

43Seethetitlepageforthefullquotes.

Page 41: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

39

wouldhelpendthecurrentpracticeofsubsidizinglow-wage,“race-to-the-bottom”employmentmodelsthathaveincreasinglycharacterizedthehumanresourcepracticesoffor-profit,non-profit,andgovernmentemployersalike.AlthoughwedonotattempttoidentifyaparticularMLWlevelorthedateatwhichitshouldbefullyphasedin,weoffersomeevidenceofthekindthatmightbeusedtodoso.a)TheProblem:ALow-WageSocialModelTheresponsibilitythatathestatutorywagefloormustbeartobringtheincomeofworkingfamiliestolevelssufficienttoprovideadecentstandardoflivingdependsonthelargerinstitutionalcontext.Thisincludesthenatureofsocialprotectionpolicy(e.g.,targetedtaxbenefitsliketheEarnedIncomeTaxCredit,andchild,housing,education,andhealthbenefits),theextentandeffectivenessofcollectivebargaining,andthesecurityandbargainingpowerthatcomeswiththestrengthoflabormarketinstitutionssuchasemploymentprotectionlawsandunemploymentbenefits(Grimshawetal.2016;MarchalandMarx2015).Inaddition,corporategovernanceandwage-settingnormsintheprivatesectorcanplayabigroleinthesettingofwagesforless-skilledworkers.Onalloftheseinstitutionaldimensions,U.S.workersfacetheskimpiestsocialsafetynetandthemostcompetitiveandprecariousjobmarket.Todate,thefederalminimumwagehasbeensettoalignwiththis“low-road”labormarketmodel,witharealandrelativewagefloorthatisthelowestintheaffluentworld(seeSection2).ThefailureoftheU.S.labormarket—andthefederalminimumwage—tosetadecentlowerboundaryforhourlypaycanbeseeninthedata,whichshowssteadilyworseningperformancesince1979,particularlyforyoungworkers.Defining“lousyjobs”asthoseinwhichworkerswerepaidlessthan2/3ofthemedianwageforfull-timeworkersages18to64($12.50in2014)orwereworkinginvoluntarilypart-time,theincidenceoflousyjobsforyoungworkersages18to34withoutacollegedegreehasincreasedastronomicallysince1979.Forfemales,thelousy-jobrateforthisgroupincreasedfrom53.1percentin1979to70.1percentin2014;forsimilaryoungmen,theincreasewasevenlarger:from28percentin1979to57.1percentin2014.Thiscomparestolousy-jobratesforyoungmenwithoutacollegedegreeof44.9percentintheUnitedKingdomandjust18.1percentforFrance(2012).ComparedtotheU.S.youngfemalerateof70.1percent,theyoungU.K.andFrenchfemaleratewere59.9percentand29.2percent.4444Author’scalculations(Howell’sEquitableGrowthDecentJobsProject).Canada’slousy-jobratefortheseworkerswasalmostasbad:68.6percentforfemalesand47.5percentformales.

Page 42: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

40

b)From‘NoJobLoss’toa‘TotalEarnings’andMinimumLivingWageStandard

Wesuggestthattheprimaryconsiderationforsettingthefederalwageflooristhestandardoflivingthatcanbeattainedfrompaidemployment.Wedonotproposeaspecificdetailedplanforsettingthefederalwagefloor,muchlessaparticularMinimumLivingWage(MLW).ButwedoarguethattheprimaryconsiderationinthesettingoftheMLWisasociallyacceptabletargethourlywageonstandardoflivinggrounds,andthatemploymenteffectsoughttobeanimportantbutsecondaryconsideration.Inasking“Cantheminimumwagebe‘toohigh?”,thedominantminimumwageresearchersofthelastgeneration,DavidCardandAlanKrueger,implyaconventionalNo-Job-Loss(NJL)criterion.

Ultimately,however,aminimumwagethatissettoohighwouldbeexpectedtocauseemploymentdeclines,evenwhenfirmshavemarketpowerandsetwagesmonopsonistically.Ourviewisthatthepoliticalprocessusuallypreventstheminimumwagefromexceedingthepointwhereitadverselyaffectstotalemployment,butitisimportantforresearchtoestablishwheresucheffectswouldoccur…Eveniftheminimumwagedoesexceedthislevel,however,itwillstillincreasetotalearningsforlow-wageworkersiftheelasticityofdemandislessthanoneinabsolutevalue(CardandKrueger2015,p.xx).

“Toohigh”isdefinedinthispassageasalevelthatcausesemploymentdeclines—alevelabovewhatwehavecalledtheNJLthreshold.Buttheyalsoappeartoenvisionanotheryardstick,anarrowlydefinedmeasureofnetbenefits:thechangeintotalearningsforlow-wageworkers.ThiswouldgofarbeyondthestrictNJLcriterion,inwhichthewagefloorshouldbesettoprecludetheriskofanyjoblosstakingplaceanywhere.Sinceitiswell-knownthattheelasticityoflabordemandisfarbelowone—Manning(2016)hasarguedthatitmaybeessentiallyzeroevenforU.S.teenagers—therewouldbeagreatdealofroomunderthis‘totalearnings’standardforwagefloorstobesetwellabovetheNJLthreshold.ThecaseforthismoreambitiouswagefloortargetwouldbeevenstrongerifweheededtherecommendationsmadebyJohnBatesClarkin2013andcloselymonitoredemploymenteffectsinnear-real-time,with“emergencyrelief”legislatedalongwiththeminimumwageincreasestosupportworkerswhowereharmed.

Emergencyreliefneedstoaccompanytheminimum-wagelaw,andeffectivemeasuresforitmustbereadytoactthemomentthelawis

Page 43: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

41

passed.Itwillnotdotodischargetheworkersandthendebatethequestionastohowbesttogivethemwork.Moreover,suchemploymentaswefurnishshouldbesuchasself-respectingpersonsmayproperlyaccept(quotedbyPrasch,2000,pp.257-8).

Adoptingthe“totalearnings”criterion,theMLWshouldbesetwiththegoalofeliminatingextremelowpay,asBelgium,France,andtheScandinaviancountries(throughcollectivebargaining)havealreadyaccomplished,andifthisshouldleadtosomejobloss,thereisnoquestionthatthenetbenefits(evenifmeasuredonlyintermsofearningseffects)wouldvastlyoutweighthecostsofgenerous“emergencyrelief.”InsteadofinvokingthenarrowParetoCriterionofnoharmtoanyone,thiswouldmeantheadoptionofwhateconomistsrefertoastheCompensationCriterion,inwhichnetbenefitscanbeusedtofullycompensatethoseharmedbyapolicy.TheLowPayCommissionintheUnitedKingdomoffersamodelofaninstitutionalsetupthatcouldoperationalizeanMLW,onethatisinextricablylinkedtoacompensationschemethateffectivelyensuresfullemployment.45Thiscommissionwouldberesponsiblefor(1)decidingtheappropriateMLW;(2)regularmonitoringandadjustmentsofthesemandatesbasedonevidenceoftheeffectsonbothlivingstandardsandemployment;and(3)planningeffectiveresponsestoanyjoblossesthatcannotbeavoided.46c)TheMLW:HowLittleisTooLittle?AlthoughonlyahandfulofcountrieshadestablishedminimumwagesatthetimeoftheTreatyofVersailles(1919),thetreatycalledfor“thepaymenttotheemployedofawageadequatetomaintainareasonablestandardoflifeasthisisunderstoodintheirtimeandcountry”(Anker2011,p.16).Similarly,theopeningsentencesoftheFairLaborStandardsActof1938makeclearthattheprincipalmotivationforlegislatingaminimumwagewastoeradicatethose“laborconditionsdetrimentaltothemaintenanceoftheminimumstandardoflivingnecessaryforhealth,efficiency,andgeneralwell-beingofworkers.”TheminimumwagewasalsoincludedinthegeneralprinciplesoftheInternationalLabourOrganization(ILO);aresolutionadoptedin1945recommended“theestablishmentofappropriateminimumwagestandards,adequateforsatisfyingreasonablehumanneeds”inorderto“assisttheprogressiveraisingofthestandardoflivingofallworkers”(ILO2014,p.3).45AstheResolutionFoundation(2014)haspointedout,theLowPayCommissionshouldhavebeencalledthe“MinimumWageCommission”becauseit’schargewasnottoreducetheincidenceoflowpay.46AstheAmericaneconomistJohnBatesClarkwroteoveracenturyagoin1913(Prasch2000).

Page 44: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

42

Thereisnoconsensus—nationallyorinternationally—abouthowtodefineaspecificandrealisticlivingwage.Mostapproachesagreethatataminimum,thelivingwageshouldbehighenoughtoallowaworkerwithafamilytocoverthebasicsubsistencecostsofshelter,food,transportation,clothing,andutilities.Itemssuchashealthcareandeducationarefreeinsomecountriesandnotinothers,sothatimpactsthenecessarywage.TheILO’sRichardAnker(2011)hasdevelopedamethodologyfordeterminingalivingwageinaninternationalcontext.PerhapsthelivingwagecalculationsfromabroadthataremostdirectlyrelevantforthinkingaboutanappropriateMLWfortheUnitedStatescomesfromtheLivingWageFoundationintheUnitedKingdom,whichreliesonresearchfromtheCentreforResearchinSocialPolicy(CRISP)atLoughboroughUniversity.Theirliving-wageestimatesareintendedto“showhowmuchhouseholdsneedinaweeklybudgetandhowmuchtheyneedtoearninordertoachievethisdisposableincome”foravarietyofhouseholdtypes.47TheFoundation putsthe2016livingwageat£8.25outsideLondonand£9.4inLondon.48Thesefigureswouldtranslateintoa2016U.S.livingwageofbetween$11.77and$13.41.49IntheUnitedStates,thereareseveralmethodologiescommonlyusedtoestimateabasic-needsbudgetforworkerswithdifferentfamilytypes(e.g.singleadult,singleadultwithonechild,twoadultswithtwochildren).50Mostfindthatthewageneededtopaythebasiccostsofliving—housing,food,transportation,utilities,taxes,healthcare,savings,clothing,andpersonalitems—requiresafull-timejobatawagethatis,asFigure10suggests,atnearly$14perhourforasingleperson,andatleast$22forasingleadultwithonechildinlowcost-of-livingareas.Forexample,amongtheninecitiesshowninthefigure,Minneapolishasthelowestbasic-needsbudgetforasingleperson($13.62)andHoustonhasthelowestforasingleadultwithonedependentchild($22.67).Thiscomparestotheproposed2020federalminimum

47http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/crsp/mis/whatismis/48FortheLivingWageFoundation,seehttp://www.livingwage.org.uk/;ForCRISP,seehttp://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/crsp/49Theseareroughestimates,calculatedbyusingtheOECD’sPurchasingPowerParity(PPP)multiplier(1.426)for2014totheLivingWageFoundation’sestimateoftheLondonandoutsideLondon2016livingwage.The1.426factorwascalculatedbytakingtheratiooftheU.K.PPPadjusted2014nationalminimumwagefromtheOECD($9)totheUnitedKingdom’s2014nationalminimumwageinpounds.50ThisincludestheEconomicPolicyInstitute’sFamilyBudgetCalculator,theSelf-SufficiencyStandarddevelopedbyDianaPearce,andtheMITLivingWageCalculatordevelopedbyAmyGlasmeier.Alloftheseprovideestimatesoftheincomeneededtocoverbasiclivingcosts,byfamilysizeandtypeaswellascityandstate.AlsoseeFredericksen(2015).

Page 45: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

43

wageof$12,whichistheequivalentof$10.92in2016(basedonCBOinflationprojections),andtheproposed$15in2021—about$13.34intoday’sdollars.Figure10:TheFull-TimeHourlyWageRequiredforBasic-NeedsBudgetbyFamilyTypeforSelectedCitiesfor2016(withlinesshowingproposed2020and2021minimumwagesin2016dollars)

Source:Tungetal.(2015),table3.1;derivedfromEPI’sFamilyBudgetCalculator).Figure11:TheFull-TimeHourlyWageNecessarytoRentaModest2-BedroomApartment:tenselectedstates,statewideaverageandthenonmetropolitanaveragein2015(withlinesshowingproposed2020and2021minimumwagesin2016dollars)

Source:NationalLowIncomeHousingCoalition(NLIHC2015).NLIHCcalculatestheseestimatesbasedonHUD’spublishedFairMarketRentandassumesthathousingcostsare30percentofincome.AsecondsourceforbenchmarkingtheMinimumLivingWageistheevidencefromtheNationalLowIncomeHousingCoalition.Torentamodest,two-bedroomapartment,theaveragewagerequiredforafull-timeworker(40hoursand52

14.64 14.10 13.45 13.91 13.6215.67

14.0317.00

21.0723.59 24.06 24.90

22.67

26.76 26.40 25.86

29.58

39.35

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Bakersfield Phoenix Colorado<Spr Houston Minneapolis Chicago Buffalo Baltimore Washington

Single<Adult With<1<Child

2021: $15<($13.34)2020:<$12<($10.92)

0.002.004.006.008.00

10.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.0022.0024.0026.0028.00

Alabama Arizona California Minnesota Montana New:York Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania Tennessee

State Combined:Nonmetro:Areas

2021: $15:($13.34)2020::$12:($10.92)

Page 46: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

44

weeks)was$19.35perhour,or$15.50foraone-bedroomunit(assumingrentsare30percentofhouseholdincome).

AsFigure11shows,evenforruralAlabama,therentrequiredforaminimallydecenttwo-bedroomapartmentinnon-metropolitanAlabamaisestimatedtorequirea$12.18hourlywageforafull-timeworker,whichisabout$1.20morethantheproposed$12wagefor2020wouldprovide($10.90in2016).TheaverageruralAlabamaworkercouldaffordthisapartmentwithawageequivalenttotoday’svalueoftheproposed2021$15wage,butwithonly$1leftoverperhour($13.34vs$12.18).However,eventhe$15proposal($13.34today)wouldbetoolittletocovertherentalofamodesttwo-bedroomapartmentinthefivemostexpensivecitiesinAlabama,whichwouldrequireafull-timehourlywagerangingfrom$15.15to$15.63(NLIHC2015,p.16).Thesecost-of-livingestimatessuggestthata2020wagefloorof$12wouldnotcomeclosetosatisfyingareasonableMLWstandard—evenforruralAlabama.Indeed,theysuggestthattheMLWwouldneedtobeatleast$14in2016dollars,andperhapsintherangeof$16.00to$17.00by2021.

Additionalevidenceonbasic-needsbudgetscanbefoundinthe“MakingWorkPay”reportsbytheNationalCenterforChildreninPoverty(NCCP),whichprovideestimatesoftheincomefamiliesrequireforbasicneedsincitiesofselectedstates.Thisisaparticularlyvaluablesourceforwhatisneededfromawageaftertakingintoaccounttheavailabilityofcity,county,state,andfederalmeans-testedsocialsupport.Forexample,themostrecentfindingsforMontana(for2010)suggest:

AcrossthesevenlocalitiesexaminedinMontana,familiesneedincomesofovertwicethefederalpovertyleveltocovertheirbasicexpensesofhousing,food,transportation,healthinsurance,childcare,andothernecessities….(thefigure)showsthatasingleparentwithtwochildren,onepreschool-agedandoneschool-aged,needsanannualincomerangingfrom$39,000inHavreto$46,000inKalispelltocovertheseexpenses.Thisisequivalenttoawageof$19to$22perhour—twotothreetimesthevalueoftheminimumhourlywageof$7.35andoneandahalftimesthevalueofMontana’smedianwageof$13.65(Chau2011,p.4).

TheNCCP’sstudyofIowa(for2008)producedsimilarresults.InbothIowaandMontana,thecombinationoflocal,stateandfederal“work-support”programscanpotentiallymakeupformost,orevenall,ofthegapbetweenthesebasicexpensesandnetearningsifthe“take-uprate”is100percentinareaswiththemostcomprehensivesetofsupportiveservices.Buteligibilityforthesepublicsubsidiesvariesovertimeandbyjurisdiction,andrequiressubstantialtimeandenergytoknowwhatisavailable,toshoweligibility,andtoapplyandcollect.Asaresult,

Page 47: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

45

accordingtoNCCP,“manyfamiliesdonotaccessalloftheprogramsforwhichtheyareeligible.”51

d) NetImpactsforWorkersIftheminimumwageisraised,workersmayloseeligibilityforsomeprograms,suchastheEarnedIncomeTaxCredit(EITC),theSupplementalNutritionAssistanceProgram(SNAP),orfoodstamps,52childcareandhousingassistance,andmedicalcare.Atthesametime,policycanbeusedtooffsethigherlaborcostsforemployers(suchastaxpolicyorsubsidies).Inordertodeterminethe“right”federalminimumwage,itiscriticaltotakeintoaccountthenetoutcomesforbothworkersandemployers.Thispointishighlightedwhencomparingminimumwagesintheinternationalarena.AccordingtoOECDestimates,theaveragenetU.S.minimumwagewasjust$6.26in2013,about$1.00lessthanthegross$7.25wage.53Thiscomparestoanetwageof$7.06fortheUnitedKingdom,$7.18forCanada,$8.24forFrance,and$9.54forAustralia(OECD2015a).TheOECDestimatesthatthenetgain—theshareoftheminimumwageincreasethataworkertakeshomeaftertaxesandbenefitreductions—toaU.S.minimumwageworkerwasbarelyover40percent(40centsforeachdollarincreaseintheminimumwage)in2013,whichwasmorethaninAustralia(32percent)butslightlylessthanFrance(45percent)andfarlessthanCanada(over60percent)andtheNetherlands(over80percent)(OECD2015b).GoodillustrationsofthepotentialfortheseoffsettingeffectscanbefoundintheNCCP’s“MakingWorkPay”reportsforIowaandMontana(discussedabove).Bothshowasubstantial“cliffeffect”whereworkingfamilyincomesactuallyfallastheworker’shourlypayincreases.InthecaseofIowa,asFigure12shows,incomewoulddropforafamilyofthree(asingleparentandtwochildren,ages2and6)inDesMoinesbynearly$8,000duetothelossoffoodstampsandachildcaresubsidy

51AccordingtotheChau’sNCCPMontanareport(2011,p.6),“ArecentpaperfromtheUrbanInstituteshowsthatnationallyoneinfiveeligiblechildrendonotparticipateinMedicaidorChildren’sHealthInsurancePrograms(CHIP),nearlyfourin10eligibleworkinghouseholdswithchildrendonotreceiveSNAP,andsevenin10familieseligibleforchildcaresubsidiesarenotserved.5Thesefindingsechothoseofapreviousstudy,whichfoundthatonlyfivepercentoflow-incomeworkingfamiliesreceivedabroadworksupportpackageofpublichealthinsurance,SNAPandachildcaresubsidy.”52SupplementalNutritionalAssistanceProgram.53TheOECDestimatesthetaxesthatworkersmustpay,includingmandatorycontributionstoretirementpensions,incometaxes,unemploymentinsurance,andothersocialprograms.Thenetminimumwageistheestimatedtake-homepayforafull-timeminimumwageworker.WagesareadjustedusingPurchasingPowerParitiesforprivateconsumption(OECD2015a).

Page 48: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

46

astheworker’spayincreasedfrom$10.50to$12(2008)(Fassetal.2008,figure1).AsimilarfamilyinBillings,Montanawouldhaveseenadropofabout$7,000in2010fromawageincreasefrom$13to$13.50duetothelossofthechildcaresubsidy.Inaddition,anincreaseinpayfrom$15to$18wouldincreaseannualincomebyjust$1,000becauseofthelossoffoodstamps)andotherbenefits(Chau2011,figure4).Theseexampleshighlighttheneedforacarefulassessmentofthecorrectminimumwagebasedonlocality,andavailablepolicies.Italsoshowshowitiscrucialthattheminimumwagebeunderstoodaspartofapackageofpoliciesinadditiontothewage.TheNCCPreportprofilespotentialimpactsforhypotheticalfamilies,butwealsohavesomeresearchontheactualimpactofincreasedwagesonbenefiteligibilityandnetoverallearningsfromresearchonmunicipallivingwageordinances.Researchersconductedinterviewswithworkerscoveredbythelivingwageordinancetocomparetheirbefore-and-afterincome,includingrelianceonsocialprograms.Figure12:NetFamilyResourcesasEarningsIncrease:DesMoines,IA(SingleParentwithtwoChildren,Ages2and6)

Source:NationalCenterforChildreninPoverty(2008).Forexample,Fairrisetal.(2005)studiedtheimpactoftheLosAngeleslivingwageordinance,whichrequiredfirmscoveredbytheordinancetoraisewagesfromaminimumof$4.25to$7.25perhour(plushealthinsurance)in1996.54TheyfoundthatafterthelivingwagewasimplementedinLosAngeles,amajorityofworkers

54Thelivingwageisadjustedeachyearwiththecostofliving.By2015theL.A.livingwageratewas$11.17plushealthbenefits(http://www.lawa.org/welcome_LAWA.aspx?id=596).

Page 49: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

47

reportedlessincomefromsocialprogramsbutanetincreaseinannualincome(Fairrisetal.2005).Thegainsweregreatestforsingleormarriedworkerswithoutchildren,astheywereeligibleforfewerprogramstobeginwith.Singleparentswithchildrenwere,onaverage,themostdependentongovernmentprograms,andthereforeexperiencedthebiggestdropineligibility.Still,workersinterviewedreportedanetgaininincome.Thenetgainwasnotenoughtoliftmanyworkersoutofpoverty,giventhatthelivingwageratewassetjustatthefederalpovertyline,whichsuggeststheneedforahigherwagelevel.Toensurethatminimum-wageworkersgetthemostofanyincrease,appropriateadjustmentstothebenefitschedulesofprogramssuchastheEITCandSNAPshouldbecentraltothedebateovertheappropriatelevelofthefederalminimumwage.557.ConclusionTheUnitedStatesisjustemergingfromaglobalfinancialcrisisthathaddevastatingconsequencesformanyU.S.workers,mostvisiblyinjoblessnessandthecollapseofhousingvalues.Somesevenyearsafterthetrough,theemploymentrateisonlyslowlyrecovering,buttheconventionalunemploymentrateisnowaround5percent,halfwhatitwasin2009-10.Astheemploymentcrisisrecedes,whatremainsisthemuchlongertermcrisisinlowpay,onethatshowsasteadyworseningsincethelate1970s.AccordingtotheBureauofLaborStatistics,therearemorethan35millionpeoplewhoare“workingpoor.”Theshareofworkingpoorwentfrom5.1percentofthelaborforcein2007to7.2percentin2010,andhaschangedlittlesincethen,despitethetepideconomicrecovery.Familieswithchildrenunder18yearsoldwerethreetimesmorelikelytobeamongtheworkingpoor.Theseratesofworkingpovertyarethehighesttheyhavebeensincethe1980s,whentheBLSstartingcollectingdata(BLS2015).56Theproblemofin-workpovertywillnotbesolvedbysmall-scaletinkeringwithourcurrentlabormarketpoliciesandinstitutions.Workersrequireamassiveinfusionofbargainingpower.IntheabsenceofeffectivecollectivebargainingonanorthernEuropeanscale,theinterventionthatcanbemosteffectiveintheneartermisasubstantialhikeinthenationalwagefloor,onethatrequiresemployers—for-profit,non-profitandgovernmentalike—topayadecentlivingwage.

55Onhowtobestcombinethesepolicies,see,forexample,Wicks-LimandPollin(2012).56Theworkingpooraredefinedasdefinedaspeoplewhospentatleast27weeksinthelaborforcebutwhosehouseholdincomesstillfellbelowthefederalpovertylevel.Giventheinadequacyofthefederalpovertylinemeasures,theactualrateofworkingpoorislikelymuchhigher.

Page 50: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

48

Whilethelivingwagemovementhasmadegiantstridesincitiesandstatesacrossthecountry,thefederalminimumwageremainsatjust$7.25,alevelfarbelowthatofmostotheraffluentcountrieswithstatutorywagefloors,inbothbuyingpowerandrelative(tothemedianwage)terms.Yet,evenamongmanyadvocatesforahigherfederalminimumwage,thegoalsseembarelyadequate,withtargetsof$10.10,$12,oreven$15thatarenottobefullyphasedinuntil2020-23,dependingontheproposal.Afterall,AustraliaandFrancehavealreadycomeclosetoeffectivelyoutlawinglowpay,definedbywagesthatarelessthantwo-thirdsofthemedianfull-timewage.Butcrucially,theseotheraffluentcountriesalsoprovideamuchhigher“socialwage”thantheUnitedStatesintheformofuniversal(notmeans-tested)supportforhealth,education,andespeciallychildsupport.Inthecurrentcontext,thelegalwagefloormustcarryamuchhigherburdenformaintainingminimallydecentfamilyincomesintheUnitedStatesthaninotheraffluentcountries.Atthesametime,itisunrealistictoexpectanationalstatutoryminimumwagetocarrythisentireburden.OneapproachwouldbetocomplementaMinimumLivingWage(MLW),setperhapswithreferencetoabasic-needsbudgetforasingleadultworker,complementedbyafederaluniversaltaxablechild-cash-benefitprogramalongthelinesmodeledbyGarfinkeletal.(2016).ThiswouldbesimilartoallowancesystemsalreadyinplaceincountriesincludingCanada,theUnitedKingdom,andFrance.Garfinkeletal.showthatunconditionalcashallowanceslikethesecanbemoreeffectiveatreducingpovertythanotherkindsofpoliciessuchasachildtaxcredit.AstheprominentU.K.economistAnthonyAtkinsonhasargued,“AChildBenefitthatissubstantialbuttaxable,combinedwithaprogressive(income)ratestructure…isaneffectivewayofensuringthatallfamiliesreceivesomerecognitionoftheirfamilyresponsibilitiesbutthatmoreisgivenperchildtothoseonlowerincomes”(Atkinson,2015,p.2014).Still,therootoftheproblemofin-workpovertyisinadequatepay,andthatiswherethemainsolutionmustbefound.AstheUniversityofChicagoeconomistPaulH.Douglas(1925,p.16)wroteinremarkablystronglanguageforanacademicjournal:

Itisthemostcruelformofunconscioushypocrisyforbusinessmentopayinsufficientwagestothoseoftheiremployeeswhoarefathersoffamiliesandthenbycontributingtochildwelfareagenciestofeelthattheyhavedischargedtheirduty…employersandsocialworkersalikeneedtobewareofthinkingthatsocialwork,forallitsvaluablecontributions,isanadequatesubstituteforadecentwage.

Page 51: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

49

Partoftheexplanationforourpersistentfailuretoestablishaminimallydecentwageflooratthefederallevelhasbeenthewaythediscoursehasbeenframed—evenbymanyofthestrongestadvocatesforsubstantiallyhigherminimumwage.Therhetorichasbeendominatedbyeconomics101thinking,inwhichincreasesintheminimumwageareconstrainedbytheeconomist’sParetoCriterionof“noharmtoanyone.”ItsmanifestationinthecurrentAmericanminimumwagedebateiswhatwehavecalledtheNo-Job-Loss(NJL)standardforsettingthelegalwagefloor.Thisrhetoricisthemirror-oppositeofthemoraloutrageatthepaymentoflessthansubsistencewagesvoicedinbyintellectualandpoliticalleadersofearliergenerations,fromleadingeconomistssuchasAdamSmithandPaulDouglas,tothepatricianpoliticiansWinstonChurchillandFranklinRoosevelt.AsTonyAtkinsonhasargued,toeffectivelycombatpovertyandinequality,weoftenneedachangeinthediscourse.Concerningthedebateovertheminimumwage,thecriterionforsettingtheappropriatelevelofthenationallegalwagefloorshouldnotbedrivenbystatisticalcontestsoverwhatparticularwagethresholdposes“littleornoriskofjobloss,”butratherbywhatwagewillensureaminimallydecentstandardoflivingfromfull-timework,andwhatpoliciescancomplementaMinimumLivingWagethatwillensurethatanycostsofjoblossareadequatelycompensated.Ifwereallycareaboutmaximizingemploymentopportunitiesthenwewouldputamuchhigherpriorityonfull-employmentfiscalandmonetarymacroeconomicpolicy,minorvariationsofwhichwouldhavemassivelygreateremploymenteffectsthaneventhehigheststatutorywagefloorsthathavebeenproposed.ButitisalsowellwithinourcapabilitiestocounteranyjoblossthatcanbelinkedtotheadoptionofwhatJ.B.Clarkin1913called“emergencyrelief”suchasextendedunemploymentbenefits,educationandtrainingsubsidies,andpublicjobsprograms.AMinimumLivingWagecombinedwithmeaningfulchild-cashallowanceswouldputtheUnitedStatesbackamongotheraffluentnationsbypromotingworkincentiveswhileallbuteliminatingbothin-workpovertyandchildpoverty.Itwouldputthecountryintowatersthatmostotheraffluentnationshavechartedandarealreadynavigating.

Page 52: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

50

ReferencesAllegretto,SylviaandMichaelReich.2015.AreLocalMinimumWagesAbsorbedbyPriceIncreases?EstimatesfromInternet-basedRestaurantMenus.IRLEWorkingPaper#124-15.Berkeley,CA:InstituteforResearchonLaborEmployment,UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley.

Allegretto,Sylvia,ArindrajitDube,andMichaelReich.2011.DoMinimumWagesReallyReduceTeenEmployment?AccountingforHeterogeneityandSelectivityinStatePanelData.IndustrialRelations50(2):205-240.

Anker,Richard.2011.EstimatingaLivingWage:AMethodologicalReview.ConditionsofWorkandEmploymentSeriesNo.29.Geneva:InternationalLabourOffice.

Atkinson,Anthony.2015.InequalityWhatCanBeDone?Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.

Belman,Dale,andPaulJ.Wolfson.2014.TheNewMinimumWageResearch.EmploymentResearch21(2):4-5.

Brown,Charles,CurtisGilroy,andAndrewKohen.1981.TheEffectoftheMinimumWageonEmploymentandUnemployment.JournalofEconomicLiterature20(2):487-528.

BureauofLaborStatistics.2015.AProfileoftheWorkingPoor2013.BLSReport1055.

BureauofLaborStatistics.1970.YouthUnemploymentandMinimumWages.Bulletin1657.Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofLabor,BureauofLaborStatistics.

Card,David,AlanB.Krieger.1995.MinimumWagesandEmployment:ACaseStudyoftheFast-FoodIndustryinNewJerseyandPennsylvania.TheAmericanEconomicReview84(4):772-793.

Card,David,AlanB.Krueger.2015.MythandMeasurement.TheNewEconomicsoftheMinimumWage.Twentieth-AnniversaryEdition.Princeton:PrincetonPress.

Chapman,JeffandJeffThompson.2006.TheEconomicImpactofLocalLivingWage.EPIBriefingPaper#170.Washington,DC:EconomicPolicyInstitute.

Chau,Michelle.2011.MakingWorkPayinMontana.NewYork,NY:NationalCenterforChildreninPoverty.Clark,JohnBates.1913.“TheMinimumWage.”TheAtlanticMonthly112:289-97.

Clark,Krissy.2014.MeettheWomanbehindIkea’sLivingWageCalculator.Marketplace,August6,2014.URL:

Page 53: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

51

http://www.marketplace.org/2014/08/06/business/meet-woman-behind-ikeas-living-wage-calculator.

CongressionalResearchService.2013.TheFairLaborStandardsAct(FLSA):AnOverview.CRSReportforCongress.

Cooper,David,JohnSchmitt,andLawrenceMishel.2015.WeCanAfforda$12.00FederalMinimumWagein2020.EPIBriefingPaper#398.Washington,DC:EconomicPolicyInstitute.

Cooper,David.2016.InflationmakesProposedMinimumWageIncreasesMoreModestthantheyAppear.EPIWorkingEconomicsBlog,February26,2016.URL:http://www.epi.org/blog/inflation-makes-proposed-minimum-wage-increases-more-modest-than-they-appear/

D’Arcy,ConorandAdamCorlett.2015.TakinguptheFloor:ExploringtheImpactoftheNationalLivingWageonEmployers.London,UK:ResolutionFoundation.

Doucouliagos,Hristos,andStanley,T.D.2009.PublicationSelectionBiasinMinimum-WageResearch.AMeta-RegressionAnalysis.BritishJournalofIndustrialRelations47(2):406-428.

Douglas,PaulH.1925.TheFamilyAllowanceSystemasaProtectorofChildren.TheAnnalsoftheAmericanAcademyofPoliticalandSocialScience121:16-24.

Dube,Arindrajit,WilliamT.Lester,andMichaelReich.2010.MinimumWageEffectsAcrossStateBorders:EstimatesUsingContiguousCounties.ReviewofEconomicsandStatistics92(1):945-964.

Dube,Arindrajit.2014.Proposal13:DesigningThoughtfulMinimumWagePolicyattheStateandLocalLevels.TheHamiltonProject(TheBrookingsInstitution).

EPI–EconomicPolicyInstitute.2015.WageDeciles(personalcommunication,Nov.23,2015).

Fairris,David,DavidRunsten,CarolinaBriones,andJessicaGoodheart.2005.TheLosAngelesLivingWageOrdinance:EffectsonWorkersandEmployers.LosAngeles,CA:LosAngelesAllianceforaNewEconomy.

Fairris,David.2005.TheImpactofLivingWagesonEmployers:AControlGroupAnalysisoftheLosAngelesOrdinance.IndustrialRelations44(1):84-105.

Fass,Sarah,KinseyAldenDinan,NancyK.Cauthen,andJessicaPurmort.2008.MakingWorkPayforIowa’sFamilies.NewYork,NY:NationalCenterforChildreninPoverty.

Page 54: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

52

FLSA–FairLaborStandardsActof1938,asamended(RevisedMay2011).WHPublication1318.URL:http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/statutes/FairLaborStandAct.pdf

Fredericksen,Allyson.2015.PayUp:LongHoursandLowPayLeaveWorkersataLoss.Seattle,WA:AllianceforaJustSociety.

Garfinkel,Irwin,DavidHarris,JaneWaldfogelandChristopherWimer.2016.DoingMoreforOurChildren:ModelingaUniversalChildAllowanceorMoreGenerousChildTaxCredit.TheCenturyFoundation,March16,2016.

Grimshaw,Damian,JillRubery,andMatJohnson.2016.“RaisingtheUKnationalminimumwage:acaseofactivatingorarrestingsocialdialogue?,”unpublishedmanuscript.

Grossman,Jonathan.1978.FairLaborStandardsActof1938:maximumstruggleforaminimumwage.MonthlyLaborReview101(6):22.

Hirshman,AlbertO.1991.TheRhetoricofReaction.Cambridge,MA:BelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress.

Howell,DavidandAnnaOkatenko.2010.Bywhatmeasure?AcomparisonofFrenchandUSlabormarketperformancewithnewindicatorsofemploymentadequacy.InternationalReviewofAppliedEconomics24(3):333-357.

Howes,Candace.2005.LivingWagesandRetentionofHomecareWorkersinSanFrancisco.IndustrialRelations44(1):139-63.

ILO–InternationalLabourOffice.2014.MinimumWageSystems.InternationalLabourConference,103rdSession,2014.Geneva:InternationalLabourOffice.

JeroldWaltman.2004.TheCasefortheLivingWage.NewYork:AlgoraPublishing.

Krueger,AlanB.2015.HowMuchisTooMuch?NewYorkTimes.October11,2015.

Lindert,Peter.2004.GrowingPublic.Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniversityPress.

LowPayCommission.2014.TheFuturePathoftheNationalMinimumWage.

LowPayCommission.2016.NationalMinimumWage:LowPayCommissionReport,Spring2016.

Luce,Stephanie.2014.FightingforaLivingWage.Ithaca,NY:CornellUniversityPress.

Manning,Alan.2016.TheElusiveEmploymentEffectoftheMinimumWage.CEPDiscussionPaperNo.1428.Marchal,SarahandIveMarx.2015.“StemmingtheTide:WhatHaveEUCountriesDonetoSupportLow-WageWorkersinanEraofDownwardWagePressures?”IZADPNo.9390(September).

Page 55: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

53

NationalCenterforChildreninPoverty.2008.MakingWorkPayforIowa’sFamilies.

NLIHC–NationalLowIncomeHousingCoalition.2015.OutofReach2015.Washington,DC:NLIHC.

Neumark,DavidandWilliamWascher.2008.MinimumWages.Cambridge,MA:MITPress.

Neumark,David,J.M.IanSalas,andWilliamWascher.2014.MoreonRecentEvidenceontheEffectsofMinimumWagesintheUnitedStates.NBERWorkingPaperNo.20619.

OECD.2006.BoostingjobsandIncomes:PolicylessonsfromreassessingtheOECDjobsstrategy.Paris:OECDPublishing.

OECD.2015.EducationataGlance2015.Paris:OECDPublishing.

OECD.2015a.MinimumWagesAftertheCrisis:MakingThemPay.

OECD.2015b.EmploymentOutlook2015.Paris:OECDPublishing.

Parsa,H.G.,JohnT.Self,DavidNjiteandTiffanyKing,2005.WhyRestaurantsFail.CornellHospitalityQuarterly46(3):304-324.

Polanyi,Karl.2001[1944].TheGreatTransformation.Boston,MA:BeaconPress.

Prasch,RobertE.2000.JohnBatesClark’sDefenseofMandatoryArbitrationandMinimumWageLegislation.JournaloftheHistoryofEconomicThought22(2):251-263.

Reich,Michael,PeterHallandKenJacobs.2005.LivingWagePoliciesattheSanFranciscoAirport:ImpactsonWorkersandBusinesses.IndustrialRelations44(1):106-138.

Reich,Michael,PeterHall,andKenJacobs.2005.LivingWagePoliciesattheSanFranciscoAirport:ImpactsonWorkersandBusinesses.IndustrialRelations44(1):106-138.

Reich,Michael,SylviaAllegretto,KenJacobsandClaireMontialoux,2016.TheEffectsofa$15MinimumWageinNewYorkState.Berkeley,CA:CenteronWageandEmploymentDynamics,InstituteforResearchonLaborandEmploymentUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley.

ResolutionFoundation.2014.MorethanaMinimum.TheResolutionFoundationReviewoftheFutureoftheNationalMinimumWage:TheFinalReport.

Roosevelt.FranklinD.1937.MessagetoCongressonEstablishingMinimumWagesandMaximumHours(May24,1937).OnlinebyGerhardPetersandJohnT.

Page 56: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

54

Woolley,TheAmericanPresidencyProject.http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15405.

Ryan,J.(1912).Alivingwage:Itsethicalandeconomicaspects.London:MacMillan.

Scheiber,Noam.2015.RaisingFloorforWagesPushesEconomyintotheUnknown.NewYorkTimes.July27,2015.

Schmitt,John.2013.WhyDoestheMinimumWageHaveNoDiscernibleEffectonEmployment?CEPRReport.Washington,DC:CenterforEconomicandPolicyResearch.

Schmitt,John.2015.ExplainingtheSmallEmploymentEffectsoftheMinimumWageintheUnitedStates.IndustrialRelations54(4):547-581.

Smith,Adam.[1776]1937.TheWealthofNations.NewYork,NY:TheModernLibrary.

Stabile,Donald.2008.TheLivingWage:Lessonsfromthehistoryofeconomicthought.Cheltenham:EdwardElgarPublishing.

Tung,Irene,YannetLathrop,andPaulSonn.2015.TheGrowingMovementfor$15.NELPReport.

U.S.DepartmentofLabor,BureauofLaborStatistics.LaborForceStatisticsfromtheCurrentPopulationSurvey:Monthlyteenunemployment(seriesLNS14000012).

Webb,Sidney.1912.TheMinimumWage.JournalofPoliticalEconomy20(10):973-998.

Welch,FinisR.1995.CommentsbytheReviewers.IndustrialandLaborRelationsReview48(4):828-849.

Werner,AndreaandMingLim.2015.Theethicsofthelivingwage:areviewandresearchagenda.JournalofBusinessEthics.Publishedonline:February12,2015.

Wicks-Lim,JeannetteandRobertPollin.2012MakingWorkPay:CombiningtheBenefitsoftheEarnedIncomeTaxCreditandMinimumWage.Amherst,MA:PoliticalEconomyResearchInstitute.

Wofford,Ben,andManuelaTobia.2016.ASurprisingNumberofAmerica’sMayorsSupport$15MinimumWage.Politico.January25,2016.

Page 57: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

55

Appendix:AKaitzIndexThoughtExperimentArinDube(2014)hasproposedthatthecriterionforsettingthestatutoryminimumwageshouldbetheKaitzindex—theratiooftheminimumtotheaverageormedianwage—andfurtherproposesthatthe“natural”and“appropriate”Kaitzratioshouldbe50percent.ThiswouldraisetheminimumwageeverywhereintheUnitedStates,butbasedonhisassessmentoftheevidence,employmenteffectswould“likely(be)toosmalltobemeaningfullydifferentfromzero”(p.8).Thisisagoodexampleoftheapplicationofthebackward-lookingNo-Job-Loss(NJL)criterion:theminimumwageshouldbesetatthehighestwagethatevidenceshowswillposelittleornoriskofjobloss.Asheputsit,

…acomparisonoftheminimumwagetothemedianoffersaguideforhowbindingaparticularminimumwageincreaseislikelytobe,andwhattypeofwagethelabormarketcanbear.Whenthisratioislow—sayaround0.2—minimumwagepolicyisnotraisingthewagesofmanyworkers.Incontrast,ahighratio—sayaround.08—indicatesahighlyinterventionistpolicywheretheminimumwageisdramaticallycompressingdifferencesinwagesfornearlyhalftheworkforce….Nooneexpectsthattheminimumwageshouldbesetequaltothemedianwage….(p.2).

ThatconclusionmaybeafairdepictionofthemainstreamU.S.minimumwagediscourse,butmanycountrieshavechosenpoliciesthatseverelycompressthebottomofthewagedistributionandhavedonesoexplicitlyonethicalcriteriaofwhatisaminimallydecentincomefromwork.The10-50(or50-10)ratioisastandardmeasureofinequalityatthebottomofthewagedistribution.Themostrecentdata(2013-15)showthattheratioofgrossearningsofthe10thpercentileworkertothemedianworkerwas45.5percentfortheUnitedStates(notmuchabovetheU.S.Kaitzratioof37percent).Thiscomparesto55.5percentand57.5percentfortheUnitedKingdomandAustralia,respectively,justover68percentforDenmarkandFinland,and72percentforBelgiumandSweden.Ahighlycompressedlow-endwagedistributionisclearlycompatiblewithahigh-employmentlabormarketintheaffluentworld.ThefundamentalproblemwiththeKaitzindexasaguidetotheriskofjoblossisthatthelevelandchangeofalocation’smedianwage—thedenominatoroftheratio—mayhavelittleornothingtodowiththedynamicsofwageandemploymentsettingatthelevelofthefirm.Dube’sproposalfocusesontwolevelsatwhichtheKaitzcanbeoperative,statesandmetropolitanareas.IftheKaitzindexdefinedfor

Page 58: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

56

geographicjurisdictionsisatallusefulasaguidetothelikelihoodofconsequentialjobloss,itshouldperformbestatthelocallevel.Thefollowingthought-experiment(withfairlyrealisticnumbers)showsthattheKaitzratiowillbewildlydifferentforthesameworkersemployedinthesamefastfoodfranchisesdependingonthejurisdictionforwhichtheKaitzratioiscalculated,rangingfromthetwoextremes(.8and.2)intheDubepassagequotedabove.Webeginwithanextremelylocallabormarket:let’scallitabigreststopontheNewYorkThruwaythatisthedominantemployerinthearea,whichisrural.Let’ssaythereare300employedworkers,rangingfrommanagerstoentry-levelcashiers,cleaners,andmaintenancestaff.AssumethattheNewYorkstateminimumwagehasrecentlyrisento$9,pushingupthewagesofmanyoftheworkersandseverelycompressingthebottomhalfofthewagedistribution.Asaconsequence,half(150)arenowpaidlessthan$11,sothemedianwageinthislabormarketis$11,andtheKaitzindexis82percent($9/$11).SincethisreststopislocatedinupstateNewYork(abovethenorthernNewYorkCitysuburbs)whichisscheduledforaslowerphase-inofahigherwagefloor(perhapsto$15),thisisanotherrelevantjurisdictionforwhichtheKaitzindexcanbecalculated.Iftherelevantlabormarketisthisupstateregionandthemedianwageis$18,thentheKaitzindexwillbe50percent($9/$18).Butiftheentirestateistherelevantjurisdictionandthemedianis$27,theoperativeKaitzratiois33percent($9/$27).Thisexampleillustrateshowdifferencesinmedianwagesacrossdifferentpoliticaljurisdictionscancausethe$9state-widewagefloortogenerateKaitzindexvaluesrangingfrom33to82percent,dependingonwhetherthereferencemedianwageisdefinedatthelevelofthereststop,upstateNewYork,ortheentirestate.ButforeachKaitzvalue,theworkersarethesame,thelikelihoodthattheworkerquits(turnover)isthesame,theabilitytopayforpastandfutureminimumwageincreasesbyreducingpayraisesforthetopearning150workersisthesame,andtheabilitytopassalonglaborcostincreasesinpricesorreducedprofitsisthesame.Whatmakesthe50percentKaitzratiotherightone?WhatwouldtheKaitzindexcalculatedforeachofthesejurisdictionstellusaboutthelikelyemploymenteffectsofanotherminimumwagehike,sayto$10(asthephase-intothe$15wagebegins)?Ifthisincreaseinthestatewagefloorpushedthemedianwageatthereststopto$12buthadnoeffectontheupstateorstate-widemedians(tokeeptheexamplesimple),thenthechangesintheKaitzratioswould

Page 59: Washington Center forEquitable Growth …cdn.equitablegrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/...1500 K Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20005 Washington Center forEquitable Growth

57

be:from82percent($9/$11)to83percent($10/$12)forthereststoplabormarket;from50percent($9/$18)to56percent($10/$18)fortheupstatelabormarket;and33percent($9/$27)to44percent($10/$27)forthestate-widelabormarket.Whichofthesechangesshouldbeusedasthebestguideto“whattypeofwagethelabormarketcanbear”?Turningthisthoughtexperimentaround,wecanaskabouttheimplicationsforthe“natural”wagefloorforeachjurisdiction,shoulda50-percentrulebeusedtosettheminimumwageafterthestatutorywagefloorisincreasedfrom$9to$10.Ifthelabormarketwasheldtobethelocalarea—overwhelminglydominatedbythe300workerreststop—thenthetheappropriatewagewouldbejust$6(50percentof$12).IfmanyupstateNewYorkStatelegislatorsarerightthattheupstateareaisthemostappropriatelabormarketforthepurposesofdeterminingminimumwageeffects,thenthe50percentKaitzrulewouldgenerateawagefloorof$9(50percentof$18).Butifthosewhoarguethattheminimumwageshouldbesetfortheentirestate,theproperwagefloorwouldbe$13.50(50percentof$27).Doesaformulathatgeneratesoutcomesthatrangefrom$6to$13.50offerausefulguidetosettingtheappropriateminimumwageforourNewYorkThruwayreststopworkersandtheiremployers?


Recommended