+ All Categories
Home > Documents > WASTE TO CONVERSATION-READY FEEDSTOCK REQUIREMENT€¦ · Feedstock density is the weight by m³. A...

WASTE TO CONVERSATION-READY FEEDSTOCK REQUIREMENT€¦ · Feedstock density is the weight by m³. A...

Date post: 05-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
WASTE TO CONVERSATION-READY FEEDSTOCK REQUIREMENT Charles Tremblay, Eng VP, Project Delivery © Enerkem FEBRUARY 19 2020 ETHANOL SYNTHESIS METHANOL SYNTHESIS SCRUBBING TOWERS COMPRESSOR GASIFIER
Transcript
  • WASTE TO CONVERSATION-READY FEEDSTOCK REQUIREMENT

    Charles Tremblay, Eng

    VP, Project Delivery

    © Enerkem

    FEBRUARY 19 2020

    ETHANOL

    SYNTHESIS

    METHANOL

    SYNTHESIS

    SCRUBBING

    TOWERS

    COMPRESSOR

    GASIFIER

  • 2

    FEEDSTOCK REQUIREMENT & FLEXIBILITY

    Enerkem converts waste into clean fuels and

    renewable chemicalso We target feedstock that are rejected from recycling and

    composting programs or from industrial production

    o Solves a waste problem and avoids methane or combustion

    emissions

    © Enerkem

    CALORIC

    VALUE (HHV)

    MOISTURE

    INERTS

    DENSITY

    BIOGENICITY

    The amount of heat released by combusting the

    material. This is directly correlated with syngas &

    product yield

    The quantity of water in feedstock. If moisture is not

    removed by drying, yield will be lowered

    The quantity of ashes remaining after combustion.

    A higher inert content will reduce yield

    Feedstock density is the weight by m³. A low-density

    feedstock will increase processing costs and reduce

    ability to convert CO2 into product

    The biogenicity content is the % of Carbon in

    feedstock that is coming from an organic source drive

    most of the premium price for Low Carbon Fuel

    GJ / mT

    % on a wet

    basis

    % on a dry

    basis

    Kg / m³

    % in end

    product

    DEFINITION UNIT

    CHLORINE, SULFUR AND HEAVY METALS WILL IMPACT OUR COST RELATED

    MANAGEMENT AND WATER TREATMENT

  • Typical composition of MSW

    o 50-60% biogenic (Organics, paper

    packaging, cardboard, Organic textile

    o 40-50% Fossil base carbon (plastic,

    textile, etc.)

    DRIVERS OF CARBON RECYCLING

    o Fuel blend (E10-E15) (RFS)

    o Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)

    o Landfill ban or tax (Tipping fees)

    o Carbon recycling content in product

    PRODUCT INCENTIVES

    o Biofuel (incentives 250-500 $Mt of

    CO2) push the focus for biogenic

    o Plastics and other fossil base waste

    generate more yield in the conversion

    process but still need incentive to

    compete with fossil base carbon or

    waste tipping fees3© Enerkem

    BIOFUEL MARKET & CARBON

    RECYCLING INCENTIVES

    CARBON-RICHWASTE

    While plastic packaging contributes to sustainability by keeping products fresh and reducing waste, plastic is difficult to recover and recycle. Breaking down plastic waste into their molecular building blocks with systems like Enerkem allow the possibility of achieving zero waste

  • TIPPING FLOOR

    BIOSMASS

    TIPPING FLOOR

    MSW

    TYPICAL RDF REFINEMENT & DRYING

    o Waste reception mixing area

    o Receiving Feeders and Buffers

    o Pre-Shredder

    o Trommel drum screen/ High frequency

    screener

    o Ballistic separator

    o Air Classifier

    KEY REFINEMENT EQUIPMENT

    o Ferrous and Non-

    Ferrous Separation

    o Primary shredder

    o Silo-Buffer

    o Low grade heat Dryer

    o Air Treatment /Dust Collector

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    12:0

    0:0

    0 A

    M

    2:2

    4:0

    0 A

    M

    4:4

    8:0

    0 A

    M

    7:1

    2:0

    0 A

    M

    9:3

    6:0

    0 A

    M

    12:0

    0:0

    0 P

    M

    2:2

    4:0

    0 P

    M

    4:4

    8:0

    0 P

    M

    7:1

    2:0

    0 P

    M

    9:3

    6:0

    0 P

    M

    12:0

    0:0

    0 A

    M

    CONTROL OF WASTE HETEROGENEITY SNAPSHOT OF OCT 9TH 2016

    Waste Feeding to Gasifier (kg/hr) - Coefficient of variation = 1.7%

    Syngas to Compressor Inlet (kg/hr) - Coefficient of Variation = 1.7%

    Syngas to Methanol Reactor (kg/hr) - Coefficient of variation = 1.2%

    Methanol Production (kg/hr) - Coefficient of variation = 4.0%

    GASIFICATION STABILITY WITH

    ADEQUATE RDF REFINEMENT

    4

    o Heterogeneity from waste lessens at molecular level

    o There is mechanical buffering and feedstock uniformization through the feedstock

    preparation, feedstock storage, feed system paddle mixers

    o Feeding and syngas flow rates are very stable


Recommended