+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: aolani
View: 39 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke General Counsel San Diego County Water Authority. All-American Canal. 82-mile long canal located in the southeast corner of California - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
18
1 Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke General Counsel San Diego County Water Authority
Transcript
Page 1: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

1

Water Dialogue MeetingFebruary 22, 2006

All-American Canal Lining Project

Dan HentschkeGeneral Counsel

San Diego County Water Authority

Page 2: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

2

All-American Canal 82-mile long canal

located in the southeast corner of California

Conveys water from Colorado River to Imperial and Coachella Valleys

Operated and maintained by the Imperial Irrigation District under contract with Bureau of Reclamation

Page 3: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

3

Canal Lining 23 miles of parallel,

concrete-lined canal will be constructed next to existing canal

Capture water lost to seepage with earthen canal

Water will be conveyed through exiting Colorado River aqueduct system to San Diego

Page 4: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

4

AACLP Project Location

Page 5: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

5

Public Law 100-675

Adopted 1988 Congress authorized the Secretary “in

order to reduce seepage” to “construct a new lined canal or to line the previously unlined portions of the All American Canal from the vicinity of Pilot Knob to Drop 4”

Conserved water to be consumptively used in California

Page 6: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

6

Environmental Review

JULY 29, 1994 FEIS/EIR – ROD Five alternatives including linings, parallel

canal, well field and no action Parallel Canal Alternative Selected Funding by Metropolitan 1998 State Law (Wat. C. § 12562) $200 million

1999 Reexamination 2001 Determination for Funding Agreements

Jan. 12, 2006 USBOR Supplemental Information Report

Page 7: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

7

Public Law 106-377

H.R. 4733 (Packard Amendment) October 2000

Notwithstanding any other provision of law 16,000 acre-feet permanently and

annually to the SLR Settlement Parties Sufficient power from Parker-Davis

Project to convey water to Lake Matthews

Page 8: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

8

Quantification Settlement Agreement

Signed October 2003 Provides diversification of

San Diego supply portfolio: Total of 277,700 AF in 2021 IID Transfer - up to 200,000

AF/yr for 75 years Coachella Canal Lining – 26,000 AF/yr – (4,500 to SLR) All-American Canal Lining – 67,700 AF/yr – (11,500 to SLR)

Page 9: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

9

Related Agreements

Colorado River Water Delivery Agreement US, IID, CVWD, MWD, and SDCWA

Allocation Agreement US, MWD, CVWD, IID, SDCWA, and

SLR Settlement Parties MWD assigns canal lining water to

SDCWA

Page 10: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

10

Current Timeline

USBOR Supplemental Information Report – 1/12/06

Construction and finance agreements approved - SDCWA, IID and USBOR – 1/06

Construction Contract Award -- May - June Notice to Proceed -- June 2006 Completion deadline Dec. 31, 2008

Page 11: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

11

Effect on QSA?

YES! Domino Effect Significant delay can terminate QSA

“TRANSFER STOPPAGE” On termination of QSA, related

agreements unravel QSA Conservation Benchmarks

Suspension of Interim Surplus Guidelines Loss of Inadvertent Overrun/Payback

Policy

Page 12: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

12

Water Conserved from Lining the All-American Canal

SDCWA 56,200 ac-ft

SLR11,500 ac- ft

67,700 Acre-Feet per Year – 97 cfs diverted at Parker (>2% avg. mo. flow) – 10 – 12 % reduction in “recharge”

Page 13: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

13

Existin

g AAC

Construct Lining

New

AA

C

Page 14: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

14

All-American Canal typical sections

Proposed Lined Section13/4H or 2H:1V side slope

Existing Unlined Section2H:1V side slope

50’

136-164’

130’ +/-

Spoils

24’ O&M Road

Page 15: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

15

Page 16: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

16

Page 17: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

17

Page 18: Water Dialogue Meeting February 22, 2006 All-American Canal Lining Project Dan Hentschke

18

Litigation

Original complaint 8 counts 1-4 water law counts 5-8 environmental law counts

Feb. 8, 2006 Judge Roy dismisses all but Count 5 (NEPA/APA Count)

Amended Complaint? Status Conference March 3, 2006


Recommended