Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | james-krupa |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
1/56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
2/56
Water in America 2
Abstract
This paper discusses the topic of water. It begins with an introduction on why we need to be
concerned with the precarious state of our planets changing climate and what it means for the
future of freshwater supplies. The paper then goes on to explore what water is, why it is
important, where it is found and how we use most of it in the U.S.. The data used is the most
recently available and from direct sources, such as federal and state agencies, as well as reliable
non-profit and educational organizations. There are also discussions on how data is used and
how it can be interpreted. Most of the data and discussion will be focused on the U.S. and
geographical areas that are highly likely to affect the U.S. The laws and ethics around water are
discussed, as well as possible solutions to problems we may encounter from a changing climate
and freshwater shortages. Only a fraction of information relevant to this subject matter will be
covered and is not meant to be a comprehensive water risk management or other report.
Keywords: water, crisis, environment, natural resources, global warming, carbon
emissions, risk, business, drought, economy, United States, California, Alaska, Washington,
Oregon, Texas, technology
Special notes: If there are any claims or objections to information published herin, please contact
me for corrections or removal. This report has been compiled out of concern over a growing
problem and is simply for research and no profit is intended to be generated from the information
herein.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
3/56
Water in America 3
Outline
WATER IN AMERICA: The Next Crisis
1.0 Introduction1.1 Why Worry about Water?1.2 What is water?1.3 The Hydrologic Cycle1.4 Where is Water?1.5 How do we use Water?1.5.1 Thermoelectric1.5.2 Irrigation1.5.3 Everything Else
2.0 Drought
2.1 What is Drought?2.2 Measuring Drought2.3 Drought & Weather Patterns2.4 Drought from Changes in the Arctic?
3.0 State of the States
1.1. California1.2 Alaska1.3 Washington1.4 Oregon
4.0 State of the World
4.1 The Middle East5.0 Water Law & Ethics
5.1 Prior Appropriation Doctrine5.1.1 Preventing Water Wars5.2 Riparian Rights5.3 Federal Rights5.4 Groundwater Rights5.5 The Dangers in Utility
6.0 Domestic Solutions
7.0 Embracing Technology
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
4/56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
5/56
Water in America 5
challenged as we attempt to meet them. New technologies will be required to meet rising global
demand, and most importantly, we will all need to change the way we think and behave.
Every year since 2000 has been warmer than the previous and rising carbon dioxide
levels have directly correlated to this, a trend that does not bode well for our future generations.
As climates become warmer, electricity demand will soar as people attempt to cool their homes,
further accelerating carbon emissions and the destabilization of our planets weather patterns. As
more acidic carbon enters the atmosphere, our oceans will be forced to absorb as much as they
can, to the point of destroying ocean eco-systems and negatively affecting entire chains of life.
The global human demand for freshwater is already at or beyond capacity in many places, and assources of freshwater such as mountain snowpack begins to shrink or completely disappear, large
human populations will be at serious risk for water shortages. The Earths human population is
predicted to surpass 9 billion by 2050 according to the United Nations (2005), and much of the
population will depend on freshwater from sources that may not exist in another 100 years.
Water is our most valuable resource, and safeguarding it for future generations requires
education and cooperation from businesses, governments and individuals.
What is Water?
Water is a unique substance that is responsible for most, if not all life that is known or
believed to exist in the Universe. Every living thing is made up of cells which rely on water to
dissolve, distribute and excrete solids. Water is unique for many reasons, but most importantly
because it can exist in several forms that work to refresh and sustain our planet. Water can existas a solid like ice, a liquid or gas. Water serves as the perfect medium for solids to dissolve in
and be transported through, as demonstrated by the human body. In-fact, the human body
consists of between 55-78% water, of which with just 15% dehydration, we would die within
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
6/56
Water in America 6
days (EPA Water, 2012). The brain alone is composed of around 95% of water. Most of the
foods we eat are made mostly of water. Fruits and vegetables are over 80% water. Chemically
speaking, water is made from two elements intensely compounding together: hydrogen and
oxygen. Water molecules consist of two hydrogen atoms connected to one oxygen atom. These
water molecules, or H20, form hydrogen bonds when they come into contact with one another,
which is why we can have vast oceans of bonded water molecules. Covalent, or strong bonds,
hold the slightly positively-charged hydrogen and slightly negatively-charged oxygen together
using shared electrons. Weak hydrogen bonds allow water to separate temporarily, as it rolls
downstream through rocks, or as people, fish or boats move through it; or, as molecules attachedto compounds as water acts as a solvent. At around 39.2 degrees Fahrenheit, the hydrogen bonds
of water begin to change as it becomes denser, while it expands by around 9% as freezing
Figure 1
causes water to sink below any ice (Water Resources, 2012). Yes, those giant ice glaciers are
floating atop of water because they are molecularly less dense, allowing for a sort of insulating
effect to occur without freezing the entire body of water, which explains why so much life can
exist beneath iced over lakes or glaciers. Without this amazing feature of water, entire bodies of
water would freeze solid below 32 degrees Fahrenheit or 0 degrees Celsius. Massive glaciers and
land mass can exist, because as water molecules warm, the rate of expansion is significantly less
than occurs as water freezes -- another amazing feature of water that also serves to help reflect a
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
7/56
Water in America 7
large amount of solar radiation that would otherwise cause our planet to be inhospitable to
humans.
Water becomes a gas vapor when it is heated with a tremendous amount of energy that
breaks the hydrogen bonds and carries the gases into our atmosphere. In the atmospheric vapor
form, water captures energy reflected from the Earths surface as a greenhouse gas, and helps to
keep temperatures moderately warm. Some water vapor condenses into moisture in clouds as
part of the Earths water cycle shown in Figure 2 below.
The Hydrologic Cycle
When clouds develop enough condensation from water vapor at cooler altitudes,
hydrogen atoms become more structured and liquid water is formed and we have rain through
precipitation. Water exists in the air even when there are no clouds, and we typically only see
water in the form of clouds when molecules attach to other substances such as dust particles or
salt (The Water Cycle, 2013). We can also see water when our glasses fog up as we exit a cool
house in the hot summer, or when the ground surface is hotter than cool air moving in and fog
blankets an area. Water is always present, even when we think it is too hot or dry. The water
cycle is a way our planet recycles and refreshes water so that it never becomes stagnant and is
always able to sustain and refresh life for the millions of species that depend on it daily.
Figure 2
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
8/56
Water in America 8
The diagram above shows how water first evaporates from oceans, lakes and streams, and
into the atmosphere as vapor before it cools and condenses within clouds. After the water vapor
condenses enough for the hydrogen bonds to become more structured and turn into water, it falls
back to the surface through precipitation. This falling water goes back into the oceans, lakes and
streams where it came from, but first it soaks through soil and flows through rocks where it
creates and sustains an abundance of life on the Earths surface. Water also has an interesting
feature called surface tension whereby it interacts with soil, causing water to rise up to the
surface in an effect called capillary action, as water flows away from gravity and up to the roots
of the plants and trees that depend on this amazing force of nature (Water Resources).Where is Water?
Water covers 70% of the Earths surface and can be found in the hydrosphere and
cryrosphere, as well as the biosphere. The hydrosphere is part of the Earths geosphere, which
also contains the lithosphere, where solid Earth exists; the atmosphere, where gases such as
carbon dioxide and water vapors exist, and the cryrosphere where glaciers, snow cover, frozen
ice and permafrost lock-up most fresh water. Permafrost alone covers 18% of land in the
Northern Hemisphere, helping to reflect powerful solar radiation waves back into space (USGS,
2012). The geosphere permits all life to exist harmoniously within the biosphere, but all life
within it depends on an equilibrium, which for thousands of years has existed between the
subcomponents of the geosphere. The biosphere contains all living things, which are mostly
made of water. About 97% of the water that covers the Earths surface is too salty for humanconsumption, leaving just 3% as freshwater, and less than 1% of that 3% is consumable by
humans (USGS, 2012). Most of the fresh water on Earth is locked-up in ice and snow in areas
such as Antarctic, the Arctic, Greenland, and mountain tops like Mount McKinley in Alaskas
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
9/56
Water in America 9
Denali Park and Mount Rainer in Washington State. Around 90% of the Earths ice is found in
Antarctica, which represents about 70% of our planets fresh water -- all locked up in between
8,858-15,748 feet thick of ice, where temperatures can reach minus 128 degrees Fahrenheit
(USGS, 2013).
Figure 3
Mount McKinley, the tallest in the U.S., gets about 15 feet of snow per year, while around one
million acres of surface in Alaska is covered by glaciers according to the National Park Service
(2013). There is clearly a tremendous amount of freshwater that is locked-up in ice, where some
slowly melts and provides water for electricity and human consumption over long periods, and
other places, like remote glaciers and Antarctica, where humans may never be able to go.
How do we use Water?
#1 Thermoelectric Power
Every five years the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) issues a report identifying how
Americans use water. Thermoelectric power generation and irrigation were identified in this
report as the top two consumers of freshwater supplies, followed by public supply and domestic
uses. Thermoelectric power water withdraws were estimated by the USGS in 2005 to be around
201 billion gallons per day (b/gal day), or 41% of all freshwater withdraws in the U.S. The report
also shows that surface water accounted for 99% of these withdraws, with 70% being freshwater
and 30% saltwater. The thermoelectric industry currently provides 90% of the electricity supply
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
10/56
Water in America 10
to the United States. Thermoelectric power plants produce electricity by generating steam. A
single 500 Mega Watt coal-fired thermoelectric power plant might use over 12 million gallons of
freshwater per hour for cooling, while around 67% of thermoelectric plants were recorded by the
Department of Energys National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) as being coal-fired as
of 2005 (Shuster, 2009). Figure 4 above shows how these facilities work.
Figure 4
The water that is withdrawn from the environment cools the facilities and then it must be
cooled itself before being released back into the stream, river, lake or ocean it came from.
Different regions of the U.S. are controlled by special non-profit councils created in 2005 by the
Department of Energy to regulate the power supply and reliability in each respective region.
New York State currently diverts 70% of its freshwater supplies to hydroelectric power plants.
Figure 5 shows a map of how these councils are divided according to the region they provide
power to and the number of plants per region. Some of these councils extend into Canada.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
11/56
Water in America 11
The Southeastern Reliability Council (SERC) is the largest consumer of freshwater
supplies for thermoelectric power plants, followed by the East Central Area Coordination
Agreement (ECAR) according to the USGS (2009). These strong regional appetites for
freshwater in generating electricity have come at a serious cost to the environment and entire
communities. For instance, Georgia, Alabama and Florida are still battling each other in court
over what some believe is Atlantas overuse of freshwater supplies for electricity and irrigation.
The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee Flint River Basin is a massive basin that begins near Atlanta,
Georgia and extends south down to the Gulf of Mexico. Before it reaches the Gulf, it supplies
Figure 5
water to millions of acres of estuaries, aquifers, lakes and streams. The problem is, because of
Atlantas nearly 450,000 citizens huge appetite for water and electricity, the south is beginning
to dry up and entire communities and the environment are suffering. Atlantas population is
projected to grow by an additional one million people by 2030 according to the Atlanta Regional
Business Coalition (Sengstacken, 2013). Figure 6 below shows just how massive the Flint River
Basin is, and allows one to imagine the impact that will be as the area enters into long-term
drought conditions. In 2008, Atlanta almost ran out of drinking water as the Army Corps of
Engineers released water from Lake Lanier during a severe regional drought. Thermoelectric
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
12/56
Water in America 12
power and irrigation is literally causing regional conflict now and may only increase in the future
if action is not taken by state planners, farmers and individuals who consume freshwater. The
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has made several recommendations for preventing
a future freshwater crisis in this region. Some of their recommendations include:
Figure 6
increasing electricity generation efficiency, increasing renewable generation, increased use of
dry/hybrid cooling technologies; recycling water within the thermoelectric power plant by
capturing the vapor; using degraded water from plant discharge, storm water flows, saline
aquifers and coastal water supplies such as oceans (Energy & Water, 2010). When most of the
power our nation gets is from freshwater, a finite resource that is slowly disappearing, we all
must do our part to better manage how we use water, and consider how we virtually export it.
How Do We Use Water? #2 Irrigation & Agriculture
The number two cause of freshwater withdraws in the United States behind
thermoelectric power is irrigation. Out of the 410 billion gallons of water used per day in the
United States -- California, Idaho, Texas and Florida account for 25% of consumption. Idaho
uses 2.5 billion gallons of water per day simply for raising farm fish (USGS, 2009). In one day,
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
13/56
Water in America 13
California uses an estimated 24.4 billion gallons of water, or one fifth of all irrigation water
consumed in the United States daily for agriculture according to the U.S. Geological Survey
(2009). California has an estimated 9 million acres of irrigated land, using about 32 million acre-
feet per year of freshwater supplies (Shaw, 2005). Idaho is the second largest consumer of
freshwater for irrigation, and Colorado the third. A study released by the USDA in September of
2012, showed that in 2007, 54.5% ($78.3) of all crops sold in the U.S., were from nearly 57
million acres of irrigated farms (Schaible & Aillery, 2012). In 2009, 77.5 million acres of land
were planted with soybeans, accounting for 23.7% of all irrigated crops according to the USDA
(2012). In 2011, farm exports from the U.S. totaled $137.4 billion, supporting an estimated 1.5million jobs domestically. In 2012, the U.S. exported 8.6 million tons of soybeans to China, or
$4.3 billion worth (USDA, 2012). The question we need to ask after seeing this data, is whether
or not it is worth it for us to allow China to preserve their freshwater supplies and land, while
importing virtual water and land on the cheap from the United States through crops. While
heavily subsidized farmers use tremendous amounts of freshwater supplies and land to irrigate
their crops, our environment suffers and our future supplies of freshwater are put at risk. Jobs are
created, and a few people become very wealthy, but looking at the long-term picture it is not
worth it to allow other countries to import our land and water, saving themselves billions in
costs. Part of the reason for backwards tendencies is backwards policies crafted by backwards
politicians who can hardly see beyond their campaign contribution checks. For instance, the corn
industry receives relatively large subsidies from the federal government to produce ethanol in an
alleged effort to combat global warming caused by burning fossil fuels; however, so many
natural resources like oil and huge amounts of fresh water and fertilizers are used to grow this
corn, and then the runoff pollutes our rivers, lakes, streams and even creates massive Dead-
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
14/56
Water in America 14
zones in the Gulf of Mexico. And so, we need to pause for a moment and ask ourselves why we
are not questing the wisdom of our elected leaders, or why, we are not crafting and proposing
alternative trade and market pricing concepts that would benefit Americans more than foreign
governments and a select group of corporate farmers who benefit most. How Do We Use Water? #3 Everything Else
Of the fractional amount of drinkable water on the Earths surface, considerable amounts
are being wasted on frivolous uses such as watering lawns, filling pools and washing cars.
Bottling factories and water filtration plants also waste billions of gallons of fresh water yearly.
In the U.S., personal use of water is equivalent to around 100-176 gallons used per household
each day, contrasting sharply with just 5 gallons used by the average African household
according to the Water Information Program (2012). In places like Las Vegas, where the natural
environment is a dry, arid desert, it is almost unethical to have a front lawn, swimming pool or
golf course especially considering the city is running out of water and planning to divert
billions of gallons more from other parts of the state just to meet the needs of this city. Golf
courses alone use 7.6% of fresh water supplies in Las Vegas, while single family households
account for 44.5% (Southern Nevada, 2009). With a changing climate, the way we use water on
a daily basis will become more important to governments as more frequent and longer droughts
force states and local governments to change how they currently use water, and how they will
allow water to be used in the future. Drought is the main threat facing states in the West.
DroughtWhat Causes Drought?
Drought is what happens when we run out of water flowing from our mountains, rivers,
lakes, streams, ponds and other sources. When we hear about drought affecting some state or
county on the news, we automatically think of extremely dry weather, low water tables, and calls
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
15/56
Water in America 15
for water conservation. Some experts may even feel inclined to alarm the public in declaring the
planet is warming from human activity or natural phenomena. Many claims of global warming
from human activity can be scientifically justified, as is the case of data showing C02
measurements in the atmosphere directly correlating with human development and our use of
coal-fired power plants and other fossil-fuel emissions. We should, however, keep in mind that
many of the extremes we experience now in our weather have been occurring since before
humans existed, although at a much slower rate and were not directly correlated with rises in
atmospheric C02, massive holes in the Ozone layer, a thinning atmosphere and rising global
ocean temperatures and mass extinction of species. The science and data show that something isseriously wrong with how we are managing our resources and environment and that the change
is happening faster than ever before.
For the skeptics out there, yes forests did once grew where Lake Tahoe, California now
exists, and paleoclimatic data from measurements such as tree rings and stream-flow
reconstructions do show that much more extreme weather occurred on our planet long before
humans had cars and coal-fired power plants (Drought in California, 2012). However, because
there is no absolute certainty over the causes of drought or global C02 spikes we see now,
perhaps it would be wise to focus our attention on the real data we can see and interpret now, and
then focus on being prepared for a real and inevitable increase in natural disasters such as a
warming planet, drought, rising sea levels, super-storms and wild fires.
How do we Measure Drought?
For each state, county and municipality, there are various measures that may be used to
determine whether or not a geographical area is in drought, and there are varying definitions of
drought depending on who is measuring for it and what their baseline is. Natural variability in
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
16/56
Water in America 16
the weather has gone from what we consider extreme today to much more extreme than we could
ever imagine, in the past. The planets climate is always changing and global warming skeptics
are always quick to point that out. For scientific purposes, however, there is scientific consensus
on defining certain measures to determine how severe the weather changes are. For example,
meteorological drought can be defined by measurements from a specific time period where
precipitation has fallen below what is considered normal. Measurements of hydrologic drought
would look at a time period where there was below average runoff. Measurements of specific
water uses, like streams or rivers can also be used to determine if a particular area is in a drought.
Because of the many different ways drought can be measured, one must look carefully at the databeing measured before jumping to conclusions or making suggestions for improving the
conditions. Broad measurements, like those used by the National Drought Mitigation Center
(NDMC) in Lincoln, Nebraska, typically measure winter snowfall in the mountains when
available, how well crops are doing in specific geographical areas, reported water shortages
and/or restrictions put in place, damage level to crops as reported by farmers, and finally
scientific measurements of water levels in reservoirs, streams and wells.
Figure 7 Figure 8
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
17/56
Water in America 17
Looking at Figures 7 and 8, California was mostly in drought during Septe2013. Data can
sometimes be used to appease a special interest or political agenda; therefore, knowing how,
when and why data is taken prevents conjecture and opinions from making its way into
government planning. When it comes to measuring drought, this can be true depending on what
style and type of measurement we use, as well as when we take the measurements. For instance,
another popular measurement in the scientific community looks at the balance between moisture
demand and moisture supply.
The Palmer Z Index measures moisture conditions for a specific month, whereas the
Palmer Hydrological Drought Index and Palmer Drought Severity Index depict a specificmonths cumulative moisture conditions over several months (NCDC, 2013). Depending on what
measure we look at, or what someones political agenda may be, different conclusions can be
drawn. The figures below show the month of September of 2013 as being mostly normal to
moderately moist, while Figure 9 shows mostly severe to extreme drought for the same month.
Figure 9 Figure 10
This may cause confusion among most people, especially if the NCDC attempts to explain this
map to the general public on their website, saying that short-term dry conditions, along with
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
18/56
Water in America 18
some long-term dry conditions in certain areas, mixed with certain areas that had long-term wet
conditions, dried out the west coast (2013). Data can be confusing to most.
Drought & Weather Patterns
Depending on the geographical location, there are many different causes of drought,
while large-scale drought conditions are typically brought on by anomalies in weather patterns.
Drought conditions on the west coast of the United States, for example, depend largely on
weather patterns in the Pacific Ocean, and even on the Arctic Oscillation -- a northern weather
pattern that will be explained later in this paper. According to Californias Department of Water
Resources (CDWR) California depends most on an atmospheric high pressure belt that shifts
southwards and pushes storms in the Pacific Ocean inwards to bring moisture to most of the state
(2012). The CDWR states that a persistent high pressure zone over California during the peak
winter water production months predisposes the water year to be dry (Drought, p. 6).
Monitoring weather patterns and how they are changing can give scientists a good idea of what
type of weather a particular geographical area will be like in the following weeks and months.
The worry now is that global climate change is beginning to show irrefutable evidence that
weather patterns such as El Nio, which brings warm temperatures, and La Nia, which brings
colder temperatures, are changing for the worse, negatively affecting many countries by
contributing to larger, more intense and more extreme weather with little to no warning.
These global weather changes are not only being claimed by environmentalists or
liberals, rather they are being measured and documented by scientists around the world.Meteorological research from 2002-03 shows that rising ocean temperatures in the Pacific have
shifted the El Nio/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) away from the east and towards the central
equatorial Pacific, causing long-term droughts in places like southeast Australia and California,
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
19/56
Water in America 19
and affecting rainfall in East Africa, India, and Indonesia (as cited in Richardson et.al., 2011).
Changing weather patterns in the ocean have also been attributed to a sudden and extreme water
heat wave that destroyed many marine ecosystems and bleached large areas of coral off of
Australias west coast in 2011, shortly after the Leeuwin Current which pushes warm waters
south, failed to do just that (as cited in Feng et.al., 2013). In 2012, many parts of Australia
experienced record breaking high temperatures as high as 114 degrees Fahrenheit, while central
areas experienced up to 127 consecutive days without any water (Blunden & Arndt, 2013).
Changes to wind patterns over the oceans will affect the entire world. The International Panel on
Climate Change reported in 2007 that rising C02 levels are causing tremendous amounts ofgreenhouse gases to become trapped in the atmosphere and are pushing global temperature up
rapidly in the context of time. Oceans temperatures are increasing and wind patterns and pressure
zones are beginning to reflect this. Air movements are dependent on ocean water temperatures,
which researchers have shown has experienced dramatic and relatively sudden changes in the
past 50 years. Increasing changes in El Nio/ La Nia, activity will continue to contribute to
increased droughts, flooding and super-storms as weather becomes more extreme and
unpredictable.
Drought from Changes in the Artic?
The American Meteorological Society (AMS) issued a report in 2013, and in it includes
scientific data showing 2012 as a year of extreme weather contributing to extremely dry or wet,
and/or extremely cold or warm weather. Extreme cold temperatures in northern Africa, westernChina, and Eastern Europe were blamed on changes in the Arctic Oscillation. The Arctic
Oscillation has two phases, either positive or negative (shown in figure 11), according to the
National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). During the positive phase, ocean storms are
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
20/56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
21/56
Water in America 21
Western United States with fresh water supplies according to USGS (2013). Unfortunately, the
state of California has been in drought conditions for much of the 21stcentury because of
changing weather patterns. Longer, more intense droughts and heat-waves will take a heavy toll
on Californias agricultural sector and power industry. Humans will be put at risk for
dehydration and heat stroke, especially amongst elderly populations and young children.
Recreational activities will also be affected. Global warming and rising sea level data have also
been modeled to result in a decrease in late-spring stream flow by around 30%, a 25% reduction
in water available for the agricultural sector for irrigation, and an influx of saltwater throughout
Californias aquifers, wetlands and estuaries ultimately affecting a major source of freshwatersupply that now exists in the Sacramento / San Joaquin River Delta and supplies 25 million
people with freshwater (Cal-Adapt.org, 2013).
Snowpack in the Sierra Nevada Mountains is expected to shrink between 70 & 90% this
century if global temperatures continue to rise as they have in the past 50 years (Snowpack,
2013). Power production in California relies on hydropower for about 15% of supply, and
although short-term projections may show an increase in precipitation and hydropower supply
due to melting snow and glaciers, the long-term scenario for slow, reliable snowpack melt for
power production is bleak as financial costs from flooding lakes, rivers and streams soar and as
lakes, rivers and streams run dry (Franco & Sanstad, 2006).
Fortunately, California is actively planning for climate change by funding programs and
research and enacting legislation. One program, the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, works in
partnership with 25 state and federal agencies. According to CALFED, the program has four
main goals: ecosystem restoration, levee system integrity, water supply reliability, and water
quality. More than 60% of Californias freshwater passes through the Bay-Delta, which hosts
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
22/56
Water in America 22
one of the largest estuaries in the country according to CALFED (2007). The San-Joaquin River
Delta supplies water to one of the nations largest multi-billion dollar agricultural industries,
drawing on water supplied by the Delta, and competing with the natural environment and water
supplies for human consumption and hydropower. The San Francisco Bay area relies on the San-
Joaquin River Delta for two-thirds of its freshwater supply according to the Santa Clara Valley
Water District (2013). CALFED is working to prepare the states agricultural industry and power
infrastructure for reliable water supplies when traditional sources begin to shrink or completely
fail. The states Public Utilities Commission is also making it easier through legislation, for
private investors to build photovoltaic systems to produce and provide energy to supplementtraditional sources, and to promote energy efficiency (Franco & Sanstad, 2006). In 2006, state
legislators passed a Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32) in order to establish greenhouse gas
emission reduction targets into 2050, and to establish a greenhouse gas registry and voluntary
carbon market (Cal-Adapt, 2013). In 2009, California developed the California Climate
Adaptation Strategy to advise state agencies on how to best adapt for climate change. California
is approaching climate change by planning to ensure water supplies are guaranteed in every
scenario possible, and building the necessary infrastructure to support such plans. Many other
affected states are developing contingency plans to prepare for the effects of climate change.
Alaska
Alaska is now experiencing serious problems from climate change, but this state is also
working with the federal government and others to develop strategies that protect human lives
and guarantee fresh water supplies. Out of all the states, Alaska has had the largest regional
warming, with a rise in annual temperatures of around 3 degrees Celsius since the 1960s and
4.5 degrees Celsius in winter (as cited in Kyle & Brabets, 2001, p. 18). Alaska has thousands of
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
23/56
Water in America 23
rivers, creeks and streams, as well as around three million lakes and 44,000 miles of tidal
shoreline all of which are inhabited by 392 communities (Army Corps of Engineers, 2009). Out
of the 392 communities in Alaska, 178 reported they are experienced erosion issues from rising
water levels and increased precipitation. In some coastal communities, reports indicate that
coastal ice is now forming later in the year than previously, making the community highly
susceptible to coastal-lashing storms. In Kivalina, Alaska, for example, there is one community
where the Army Corps predicts extreme damagewithin 10 years (2009). In other
communities like Kotlik, the Corps predicts 60 percent of village structures are at risk, because
they are experiencing three feet of river erosion per year as more water flows in from meltingsnow and glaciers (2009). Unfortunately, the state of Alaska has no programs to mitigate
disasters from land erosion, although the Army Corps of Engineers has pointed out in its report,
that the U.S. Flood Control Act of 1946 allows for the Army to help restore stream banks in a
cost sharing program, where 35% would be covered by non-Federal funds (2009). The Corps
also noted that the U.S. Water Resources Development Act of 1974, allows the Corps to conduct
water resource studies in a cost sharing program where 50% would be paid for with non-Federal
funds. Finally, the U.S. River and Harbor Act of 1962 permits up to $3 million Federal dollars to
protect against storm surge and hurricanes in coastal areas only, but would require 35% of the
costs to be paid by non-Federal sources (Army Corps, 2009).
In 2007, Alaskas Governor agreed to participate in the Western Climate Initiative
between the Governors of Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington in order to
prepare for the challenges of climate change. The Governor of Alaska also signed Administrative
Order No. 238 in 2007, an order that formed the Alaska Climate Change Sub-Cabinet in order to
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
24/56
Water in America 24
develop state policies in anticipation of more serious effects from climate change (State of
Alaska, 2011).
A study in 1998 by Glenn P. Juday of the University of Alaska Fairbanks showed how a
warming climate since the 1970s has affected Alaskas forests. Juday found that around two to
three million acres of forest were impacted by beetles that have rapidly reproduced from a
warmer climate (1998). Alaska is not the only state experiencing this problem, most of Canada
is as well. When forests disappear, erosion is hastened and flooding worsened, but with climate
warming, drought must also be considered even in traditionally wet areas. Millions of waterfowl
and shorebirds make their way to Alaskas surface waters and wetlands such as the Yukon FlatsNational Wildlife Refuge for their annual breeding rituals. Unfortunately, the EPA reports that
many of Alaskas closed-basin lakes, without any stream inputs or outputs, are drying up from
climate change (Alaska Impacts, 2013). The most dramatic affects can be seen from satellite
images taken over a 50 year period from 1950 to 2000 as shown below in Figure 9.
Figure 12
Warming waters will also present challenges to many cold water fish, which fail to grow
and/or migrate when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius because of a forced increase in
their metabolic rate (Kyle & Brabets, 2001). Alaskas economy is supported by seafood to a
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
25/56
Water in America 25
large extent, and those who work in this industry will be negatively affected by climate change
and disappearing lakes. In 2011, a research report by the McDowell Group for the Alaska
Seafood Marketing Institute, found that 94,000 Alaskan seafood workers earned $2.8 billion in
2011, while exporting $6.4 billion worth of seafood internationally (2013). This report by
McDowell Group also noted that the economic benefits this industry provided has tremendous
multiplier effects worth an estimated $15.7 billion for the U.S. economy alone, and accounts for
about 10% of total U.S. seafood supply, while providing one in seven Alaskans with a job
(2013). Alaska cannot afford not to take action now to address climate change and water
management strategies through political action and cooperation with other states and the federalgovernment.
Washington
For many, it is hard to imagine Washington as having drought or other water worries,
considering September of 2013 was recorded as being the wettest month on record according to
the National Climate Data Centers (NCDC) data (2013). The NCDC also noted in its monthly
report, that the U.S. average national temperature was 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit above normal, with
September being recorded as the 6thwarmest and 12thwettest on record. So, why should anyone
worry about water in Seattle? There clearly is no shortage there not yet anyhow. State planners
and water managers are looking at the average global warming trends and are attempting to
model future weather trends; and these trends do not look good. First, Washington State is
concerned that their increased precipitation and temperatures are from climate change that ismelting glaciers and snowcaps faster than normal, causing more intense and more frequent
rainfall and presenting future challenges for water managers. The NCDC reported noted 2012 as
being the warmest year for the planet on record. Washington state officials are worried about
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
26/56
Water in America 26
future droughts and flooding because the state depends on snow pack and glaciers for water
supply, and even though abundant amounts of water from melting has been seen during the early
spring, it does not exist when summer arrives as it should, contributing to droughts and wildfires.
Consumer water supplies are not the only concern from abnormal temperatures and
rainfall. About 72% of Washington States electricity is generated by hydropower, and as
temperatures warm, demand for electricity is shifting towards summer months rather than winter
months (Climate Change Effects, 2013). Out of the 78,000 megawatts of hydropower generated
in the United States each year, more than half is generated in Washington, Oregon and California
(Hydropower, 2011). The U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) reported that the GrandCoulee Dam on the states Columbia River is the largest hydropower producer in the country,
averaging out at 6,809 megawatts (2012). Columbia River is no stranger to the effects of climate
change. In 2001, this important river experienced low flows from hotter than average
temperatures. Young salmon were unable to migrate to the Pacific Ocean, and older fish were
unable to reproduce and raise young because of warming water, just as is happening and has
happened in Alaska and other states being affected by climate change (Warmer Temperatures,
2012). The States Department of Ecology also reported that 21 million acres of Washingtons
forest, or double the annual harvest from all logging activities in Canada, were lost to increasing
pests such as the pine bark beetle, which are now reproducing more often and for longer because
of warming temperatures (2012). The picture becomes clearer the deeper we dig into the effects
of climate change all is not well with our planet. If the states rivers run dry, they will need to
resort to less environmentally friendly energy sources such as coal, and the fishing and logging
industries will suffer, as well as all the small businesses that depend on what they produce.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
27/56
Water in America 27
Washington State officials, nonprofits and individuals have begun to take steps to
mitigate the effects of climate change on the states fresh water supplies. In 2007, the state
established official policies and targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and focus on
growing a new environmentally friendly economy. A cornerstone regional policy was initiated
by Washington State, called the Western Climate Initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The initiatve includes six other states and four Canadian provinces. Some of the states policies
included tougher emission standards on 2009 and above model vehicles, new building standards
for improved energy efficiency, new rules forcing new or expanding fossil fuel power plants to
reduce 20% of c02 emissions, new energy conservation programs and appliance standards, and arequirement than ethanol be used in gas and diesel fuels (What Were Doing, 2011). The
Electrify Transportation Washington Group includes cities, counties, utilities and others in order
to help draft policies to reduce dependence on fossil fuels for our transportation sector. Seattles
Mayor Nickels led a nationwide effort that included 900 mayors who have all agreed to a 12-step
program that is designed to meet or exceed standards set by the Kyoto Protocol, including a 7%
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions according to the Department of Ecology (2011).
Washington State also formed the Washington Climate Action Team, which engages businesses,
community members, non-profits and environmental organizations in order to develop new
strategies and policies to reach the states ambitious climate change goals. Washington State is
clearly a leader in climate change mitigation and efforts to protect and preserve the environment.
Oregon
Oregon shares many of the same climate change effects as Washington State does, due to
its close proximity and shared resources in-terms of water supplies. Unfortunately, the states
leadership is not as information or technology adapted as Washington State, to deal with climate
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
28/56
Water in America 28
change problems or mitigate the effects it will have in its industries and water supplies. The
Whitehouse recently issued a scathing report titled: The Threat of Carbon Pollution: Oregon.
The report is highly critical of the states poor management of the environment and its resources.
The Whitehouse report on Oregon reports that in 2011, power plants and industrial facilities
emitted over 10 million metric tons of carbon pollution. The Whitehouse report goes on to
mention that in 2012, the state had one of the shortest winters and least amount of Spring snow-
cover on record, and that in 2011 there were 2,000 hospital admissions for asthma with an
average charge of over $14,000 for each stay (2013). In 2008, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture was forced to designate 23 counties as natural disaster areas after record freezingtemperatures, snow fall and freezing rain swept the state. On a more positive note, Governor
Kulongoski signed House Bill 3543 into law on August 7, 2007. The law was designed to halt
increases in greenhouse gas emissions by 2010, then reduce them to 75% pre-1990 levels by
2050 according to the states Department of Energy (2007). This bill also established a Global
Warming Commission which is responsible for making recommendations for ways to reduce
greenhouse gases and study a cap-and-trade carbon scheme. The state is also developing
educational strategies and created the states first Climate Research Institute. Oregons Global
Warming Commission released a report in August of 2013, claiming to have met HB3543S
mandate to halt increases in greenhouse gas emissions by 2010. The Commission also reported
that regulators came to an agreement with General Electric to terminate coal burning by the end
of 2020; however, other companies such as PacifiCorp continues to burn coal to supply
electricity to 2/3rds of Oregons power consumers, and the company has no plans to decrease its
coal burning activities according to the Commission. In late 2011, Governor Kitzhaber created a
Ten Year Energy Action Plan, setting goals for statewide energy efficiency, smart energy and a
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
29/56
Water in America 29
greener public transportation system (Oregon Global Warming, 2013). Oregon also developed
the Integrated Water Resources Strategy in August of 2012. The strategy calls for more research
of the states river basins, streams, accounting for water quantity and quality, as well as the needs
of local ecosystems in-terms of water supplies. Oregon is making efforts to get up-to-speed with
neighboring Washington in-terms of information it has on environmental issues, but the state is
clearly lacking in information its citizens needed a decade ago in order to be adequately prepared
for climate change, and a future with less water.
State of the World
The Middle East
This paper will look at the state of water issued around the world that will likely affect
the United States in the coming years. The United States will likely be drawn into conflicts all
over the world, as surface and underground water supplies continue to dwindle and civil unrest
provokes nations to war. What is needed now is economic and political support for existing
initiatives that will promote equitable distribution of water resources in regions of the world
where conflict over water is brewing. Many Western leaders may fail to adequately prepare forcoming water conflicts or work to prevent them now, considering water supplies are abundant in
many parts of Europe and Americas northeast. It is difficult for Western politicians who live and
work near lush forests and large rivers such as Americas Potomac or Germanys Rhine, to
imagine a future where wars erupt over water. This preventable crisis is very likely to occur this
first half of the 21stcentury without political action taken now to prevent it, and will thus require
American intervention something we may not be able to afford in the future.
One conflict over water that is now brewing and can be resolved with political action and
financial support now, takes place in the Middle East. Israel is one of our strongest unofficial
allies in the region, and is highly dependent on water, as is another ally of ours, Jordan. Both
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
30/56
Water in America 30
countries compete for scare water supplies from the Galilee Sea and Jordan River with Lebanon,
Palestine, and Syria, whom they share riparian water rights with but continue to have
disagreements over inequitable distribution. Americans are historically reluctant to go to war in
another part of the world, especially when there is no imminent threat to America. However, we
are bound by formal and informal treaties, to assist allies if their territory is ever attacked, as
reiterated by President Obama and presidential candidate Mitt Romney during the 2012 elections
when asked if we would support Israel in the event they were attacked. Conflict over water
resources in the Middle East has already happened in the past, and persists today as one of the
divisive issues between Israel and its neighbors. War is thus inevitable if action is not taken toprevent it, especially as more water is being used now, than is being naturally produced and as
human populations and water needs continue to explode in this region.
Water is disappearing from this region faster than ever. In Jordan, where more than 80%
of the population lives within the Lower Jordan River basin, the natural flow of water has been
significantly reduced due to excessive agricultural and drinking water needs from regional
countries. Before the dramatic development and population explosion in the region, the Jordan
river flow rate into the Dead Sea was recorded by hydrologists as being between 1,100 and 1,400
million cubic meters per year, and since then has been halved every 20-30 years, causing an
eight-fold reduction of water volume in the Dead Sea (out of water, p. 19). To make matters
worse, urban expansion and agricultural development have removed most natural forests in the
area and replaced them with unsustainable agricultural plantations that exhaust the soil and water
supplies, negatively affect biodiversity and cause costly environmental damage. In the 1940s
the Jordan River Basins Jordanian population was less than 500,000, while today it is recorded
as 6.3 million, and Israels population is now about 7.9 million according to the World Bank
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
31/56
Water in America 31
(2012). Jordans explosive growth during the 1970s and 1980s was attributed to heavy
agricultural exploitation of water resources, which today are becoming scarce as groundwater
resources disappear and aquifers are overexploited to the point where salt concentration is higher
than in the oceans (Courcier, Venot & Molle, 2005). Nearly 98% of all water from the Jordan
River is now diverted from the Dead Sea for agricultural or personal consumption, which has
contributed to a 108 feet drop in water level in the Dead Sea and a virtual wipeout of many local
and migrating species that once depended on water in the Lower Jordan River region (Albakkar
& Brown, 2011). Israel continues to divert most of the water supplies from the Jordan River for
its own use, a self-serving tactic that could eventually cause a serious regional conflict that willvery likely draw-in the United States.
Figure 13
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
32/56
Water in America 32
There have been efforts to prevent conflict over scare water resources in this region. One
proposed idea would be to start with stabilizing the Dead Sea and Lower River Jordan water
flow, which would require the construction of a 112 mile canal, or series of pipes, in a project
known as the Red-Sea Dead-Sea canal (out of water, pp. 23-24). This World Bank approved
project is estimated to cost $10 billion, with overall goals of stabilizing the Dead Sea, provide
drinking water and electricity to regional countries, and promote peaceful cooperation between
benefitting nations (Rinat, 2013). There are also plans to build the worlds largest desalinization
plant and a hydroelectric power plant just south of the Dead Sea, which would then provide an
estimated half-billion to two billion cubic meters of water per year, as well as electricity toPalestine and Jordan a project that the World Bank hopes will finance the Red-Sea Dead Sea
canal (Rinat, 2013). The United States happens to be the largest shareholder and financial
backer within the World Bank, which should offer hope to those who may be pessimistic about
Americas willingness or interest in preventing conflicts over water resources. Major
international water projects within and around Israel will come at no small cost to governments,
but their necessity for preventing more costly conflicts should provide incentive to invest now.
Water Law and Ethics
Water has inherent value in that it is something extremely useful and of value that can be
consumed and/or bought and sold by society, therefore rights to access water must be guaranteed
and protected by laws. Water has a very important utilitarian purpose, in that it provides a
necessary good to the public as a whole, regardless of social status or income level. In order forthe true value of water to be realized, it must be maximized in its utility to benefit the greatest
number of people, not a select few who abuse their rights to use water. Maximum utility, as
theorized by the likes of John Bentham and John Stuart Mill, cannot be fully maximized if rights
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
33/56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
34/56
Water in America 34
manifest over extensive use of water by miners upstream, leaving little for new miners
downstream (Grantham & Wolfe, 2011). The Appropriation Doctrine has two underlying
principles: first, it states that the use of the water must be for beneficial purposes, and second that
the first in time of use is the first in the right to access that water (Water Rights, 2010). The
Prior Appropriation Doctrine benefits those earliest holders of permits the most in times of
drought, since they have first access to the water resources, while everyone else must wait or
purchase water from those with first rights to access it. This type of grandfathered-type water
rights law poses ethical dilemmas in times of crisis. There is one positive caveat to this doctrine,
in that all permit holders can lose their first right to access water if that right is not used for acertain length of time, whereby it is then considered abandoned or forfeited and reverts back to
the state for public use (National Park Service, 2012). Beneficial purposes as interpreted by the
courts with respect to appropriation, includes uses for irrigation, manufacturing, mining,
hydropower, domestic purposes, municipal use, recreation, for fish and wildlife, in-stream flow
and other purposes as determined at the state or federal level. Changes to the law have and will
continue to change as public needs change and especially as our climate changes.
Preventing Water Wars
In 1874, drought struck Colorado and the Water Wars era began. Miners and ranchers
were physically fighting one another for access to water, until the State intervened in 1876 with a
Constitutional amendment, titled Article XVI. This new law declared all surface water in the
state without prior appropriation to be public property, and guaranteed everyone the right todivert water from it. Article XVI also declared that water use for domestic purposes took priority
over any other use, and water use for agricultural purposes took priority over water use for
manufacturing or other industrial or commercial activities. In 1922, the U.S. Supreme Court
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
35/56
Water in America 35
introduced the Compact Clause into the U.S. Constitution, a clause that allowed for interstate
water appropriation from rivers like the Colorado River. The 1922 Colorado River Compact was
the first interstate compact concerning water rights. By 1963, Colorado had nine compacts with
six other western states with regards to water rights sharing. Most southwestern states today have
adopted the Prior Appropriation Doctrine into their water rights laws; however, interpretation of
these laws are changing as needs are changing especially in places like Las Vegas which is
taking water from first claimants such as Native Americans. States that abide by almost strictly
appropriation laws now include Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New
Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. Preventing domestic water wars may not be the only concern weshould consider when it comes to cross-border water rights. The Colorado, Rio Grande and
Tijuana rivers continues to provide essential supplies of water to all states south and west of it,
but also to Mexico. In-fact, the United States signed a treaty with Mexico in 1944, whereby in
times where there was no drought, Mexico would be guaranteed at least 1.5 million acre feet of
water from rivers originating in the United States (Shaw, 2005). As climate change begins to
affect snowpack and water flows begin to significantly decrease, there will most likely be a
resurgence of national and international legal battles over how water originating in the Colorado
River Basin is shared.
Riparian Rights
In most other states, especially the eastern states, the Riparian Doctrine or a doctrine of
reasonable use, is derived from English common law, and is typically invoked in water rightsconcerns. For the most part, it states that parties that own land that has any body of water on it,
or directly along property lines, have riparian rights to access and use that water in a reasonable
manner, but cannot store the water for future use or transfer it off the watershed parcel. This
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
36/56
Water in America 36
doctrine basically guarantees all riparian owners the right to reasonable use the water, but only as
long as this use does not interfere with the rights of other riparian owners through excessive use.
The court system interprets what is reasonable use when disputes arise, meaning sometimes
judgments can be completely arbitrary regardless of any utilitarian or minority rights
considerations. For the most part, water rights serve the legal purpose of guaranteeing the right to
use water in a beneficial and non-wasteful manner. Some states, like Florida, have their own
unique blend of riparian and appropriation water rights laws. For example, in 1972, Florida
enacted the Florida Water Resources Act. Administrative systems supplanted common laws, but
permits for water diversion were made mandatory. Existing and applying permit holders mustnow pass the states Three Prong Test. Applicants for permits must demonstrate their use is
reasonable and beneficial, but also consistent with the publics interest and must show they will
not interfere with presently existing legal uses of water (Fumero, 2002).
Federal Rights
Federal reserved water rights supersede all other riparian and prior appropriation water
rights holders, similar to state and local laws that create wetlands and other reserved areas with
water access. This reserved water right is held by the federal government who has reserved land
for federal use, such as national parks, Indian reservations, wetlands, wildlife refuges, national
forests, military bases and more. According to the Department of Justice, the origins of federal
reserved water rights can be traced back to Winters v. United States207 U.S. 564 (1908). This
case guaranteed sufficient supplies of water to Native American reservations, with the prioritydate established as of the date of the reservations creation (USDOJ, 2013). In 1935, the federal
government gave states the right to water right requisition on federally owned land, in
(California Oregon Power Company v. Beaver Portland Cement Company,295 US 142 (Shaw,
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
37/56
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
38/56
Water in America 38
have different laws regulating groundwater use and rights to access groundwater. For example,
New Hampshire has recently passed a Groundwater Protection Act (RSA-485C). This law is
designed to ensure that groundwater withdraws do not adversely affect existing groundwater or
other water resources. Major users of water, such as hydraulic fracturing operations, must apply
for a permit to withdraw significant quantities of groundwater. The permitting process requires
that the applicant prove they will not negatively affect other water resources (Environmental Fact
Sheet, 2010). New Hampshires permitting process includes public notification and hearings,
field-testing and data assessment, as well as a reporting and mitigation plan. Pennsylvanias laws
abide by the Reasonable Use Doctrine, but also permit a landowner to withdraw all ground waterbeneath their land, so long as it does not cause foreseeable harm to a neighbors water use rights.
Pennsylvania also has interstate compacts, such as the Delaware River Basin Compact, 32 P.S.
815.101 et seq. (1961), and the Susquehanna River Basin Compact Delaware River Basin
Compact, 32 P.S. 820.1 et seq. (1970), which requires an interstate review of projects with
water withdraws of more than 100,000 gallons or more per day of ground or surface water, and
10,000 gallons or more per day in the southeast of the state (Bishop, 2006). When tremendous
amounts of water are taken out of the ground via aquifers for projects like hydraulic fracturing, it
almost always has a negative effect on surrounding bodies of water, whether they are surface or
groundwater. Laws are designed to protect access to water for reasonable use as well as the basic
right to access water. Unfortunately, laws based on utilitarian principles that benefit the greatest
amount sometimes hurt minority groups among us, and even present challenges to future
generations.
The Dangers in Utility
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
39/56
Water in America 39
In 1920 the population of Las Vegas was around 2,300 -- today it is around 600,000. In
2012, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approved a proposal by the Southern Nevada
Water Authority to divert underground water supplies at the rate of 176,655 acre-feet per year, or
65 billion gallons of water, from three counties in eastern Nevada to Las Vegas (Clark, Lincoln,
2012). Approximately 12,288 acres of land will be disturbed from the proposed pipeline project
according to the BLM. The domestic consumption of water in Las Vegas has grown
exponentially over the past half century, putting significant pressure on water supplies in the
region. The removal of billions of gallons of groundwater will almost certainly cause
environmental degradation and significant declines in biodiversity that relies on this water. Moreimportantly though, there are 28 Indian tribal communities and many other rural communities
that will be affected according to the BLM (2012). Because groundwater was not considered
earlier when Prior Appropriation laws were adopted, those who depend on this groundwater for
irrigation or domestic purposes will lose. The Great Basin National park and several other
wildlife refuges will be impacted, along with numerous wildlife species such as wild horses,
birds, fish and more. Reduced spring and stream flows will occur and desert area will increase
because of this diversion project. Water will be pumped hundreds of miles away to another city
for swimming pools, golf courses, hotels and other wasteful uses, while local residents and
wildlife that depend on access to this groundwater in the southeast of the state will suffer. Many
other states have and will continue to develop similar projects that divert natural bodies of water
in unnatural ways in order to satisfy public demand in select metropolitan areas. Does this action
provide maximum utility to the maximum amount of people? Yes, it does. Unfortunately,
minority groups, wildlife and our natural environment will suffer so that the majority can benefit.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
40/56
Water in America 40
This is an ethical dilemma that we will increasingly need to confront as our water resources
begin to dwindle, our climate changes and human populations increase.
Domestic Solutions
There is good news when it comes to efforts to prevent water crises in the United States.
Since 1980, the population has increased by around 70 million people, but water use has declined
from an average of 440 billion gallons per day to 410 billion gallons today (Fishman, 2011).
States are taking action in response to climate change and water shortages as populations
increase, but this is happening more on the macro-scale what we need now is for water
conservation and adaptation to climate change to occur more on the micro-level. We need
individual households, schools, hospitals, small organizations, and others to participate in water
conservation efforts. Businesses have been steadily adopting new technologies to reduce waste,
cut costs and improve productivity, including the agricultural sector. For example, the
agricultural sector uses 15% less water today, than they did in 1980, but they also produce 70%
more food (Fishman, 2011). Efficiency and conservation are slowly showing results, but there is
a lot of room for improvement. In the city of Atlanta, nonprofits like the Atlanta Water Planning
District have advocated many ways businesses and households can make changes to conserve
water, like changing older plumbing fixtures, mandating water recycling at businesses like car
washes, and changing how irrigation systems are built and deployed using sensors. Toilets
account for nearly 30% of household water use, making them a prime target for efficiency
efforts. According to one report by the Atlanta Regional Business Coalition, the city has replacedmore than 80,000 water-wasting toilets and repaired over 25,000 leaks, saving millions of
gallons of freshwater per year (Sengstacken, 2013). In cities across America, there are numerous
ways people, organizations and governments continue to waste water, but as revealed, there are
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
41/56
Water in America 41
also numerous ways they are conserving water. For instance, local governments in Las Vegas
have prohibited front lawns from new home construction projects, offered to pay for turf removal
from businesses, developed an ability to recycle over 90% of all indoor water use, and forced
golf courses to develop water usage budgets (Leonhardt, 2011). The Southern Nevada Water
Authority (SNWA) proudly reported that many businesses are beginning to utilize wastewater
recycling technologies instead of tapping freshwater supplies. For instance, the SNWA reported
in 2009, that one county alone now has nine golf courses using reclaimed water for irrigation
rather than drawing on new freshwater supplies. Municipalities are also now using reclaimed
water for maintaining vegetation along highways and for other purposes. Northern Las Vegasrecently completed construction of a 50 million gallon per-day wastewater reclamation facility.
There are also many little things that each household can do to solve and prevent water crises
from occurring, like turning off the water spigot while brushing teeth, fill an energy efficient
dishwasher, replacing water-intensive landscape, taking shorter showers, etc.
Embracing Technology
As land becomes more arid and global populations affected, conflict can be mitigated
through applied technology and resources management. When dealing with large populations,
sometimes massive government-funded projects are needed to avoid disaster and help
communities thrive. In the United States, populations living in arid areas like the Southwest will
find natural water supplies becoming more expensive or non-existent as our climate changes. In
countries like Ethiopia, many will migrate to neighboring nations for richer soil, and access tomore water, causing conflicts and wars that will eventually affect Americas. Investing in and
applying advanced technology will be the key to managing water for large populations across the
globe. According to one expert, Dr. Jerome Priscolli of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, there
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
42/56
Water in America 42
are many ways technology can help us manage water going forward. First, Priscolli suggests
governments invest heavily in desalination technology and civilian point-of-use products to
conserve existing fresh water supplies. General Electric has recently developed a water recovery
technique that can be implemented in water desalination and filtering plants, making 99% of
water recoverable and drinkable. General Electric claims to be able to save companies and
municipalities billions of gallons of water per year from being wasted through their Aquasel
Non-Thermal Brine Concentrator machine. GE estimates a saving of 11 billion gallons of
freshwater per day worldwide if their technology was implemented in just beverage bottling
plants (Markham, 2012). Technology like this will make all the difference when it is shared andapplied worldwide, helping to manage the effects from climate change.
Large cities like New York can take steps now to apply the latest technologies for
mitigating climate change. The Empire State Building owners have recently spent $13 million
for new energy-efficient windows, cutting yearly energy consumption by 38% (Sheridan, 2011),
offering another great example of how we can fight climate change. The Empire State building is
so massive that it is the only one in the United States with its own zip-code. Cities around the
world should encourage and incentivize more green building projects like this. Large
companies like GE and Alcoa will play an important role in fighting the effects of climate
change. Alcoa has recently developed aluminum surfaces with technology called Reynobond,
which can absorb carbon dioxide from the air in dense cities like New York, turning skyscrapers
like the Empire State building into virtual trees that clean our air (Alcoa, 2012). The New York
Times reports that one way to eliminate gas guzzling trucks clogging city streets and polluting
the air could be to grow fresh fruits and vegetables in skyscrapers, and without sun, water or soil
(Fletcher, 2012). Vertical farming can utilize LED lights and the direct application of nutrients to
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
43/56
Water in America 43
free-hanging roots, all to maximize efficiency and deliver healthy food to mega-cities on a daily
basis. Flooding, drought and other unpredictable events have little effect on vertical urban farms.
Vertical farming can save cities billions of gallons of water a year, and can also eliminate
fertilizer use and runoff that is currently causing huge dead zones in places like the Gulf of
Mexico. Places like South Korea and Singapore are embracing vertical farming as a means to
secure their national food supplies and create local jobs. In Singapore, Sky Green Farms
produces fresh vegetables through their mere 30 high vertical farms, while recycling water and
using little space or other natural resources (Doucleff, 2012). The future is now and there are so
many amazing new technologies that can be applied by local, state and national governments andconsumers to offset the effects we all have on our natural world. We often forget that we inhabit
a planet with billions of other species, and that the Earth is the only known planet to support life.
Conclusion
Rapid climate change over the past 50 years has begun to show signs of destabilizing the
harmony within the Earths hydrosphere and biosphere, as evidenced by mass extinction and
increasingly powerful droughts, flooding and super-storms. This is only the beginning of changes
that our generation will witness as our planets weather systems are altered. There is no way for
scientists to accurately predict what type of weather will result, other than to follow the trend of
hurricanes doubling and tripling in size and strength and other meteorological anomalies. Some
scientists warn that the changes we effect on our climate now, will take thousands of years to
undo; however, those who are hopeful among us believe our environment is as resilient as thehuman species so, recovery is more likely on the horizon if we take steps now to prevent
further deterioration of our natural environment. We have a moral obligation to make every and
any effort in our power to conserve finite resources and adopt efficient technologies, but also to
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
44/56
Water in America 44
consider the cause and effect relationship our excessive wants have on everyone and everything
around us.
When we think about how much damage will be caused from diverting billions of gallons
of water from one region and delivering to another region, we are only thinking of the maximum
human value that will result for the short-term, but now we must begin to ask whywe need to
divert billions of gallons of water and then consider how we can reduce that need or eliminate it
entirely. Do we need to wash our car every week, shower twice a day, golf on green grass, fill
swimming pools, leave the faucet running while doing the dishes, water the lawn when it gets
hot? We need to become more conscious of how we are using water as individuals, and then wecan begin to think more about how we are using water as a whole. When we begin to think about
how we are using water as a whole, only then will we begin to think about how we can change
the largest consumers of water by changing our habits or demanding new technologies be
implemented in old systems. Our planet has been around for billions of years, and it will
continue to be around for billions of years, but our hospitable environment that allows our
species to thrive now has the power to alter the environment in a short span of history, enough to
affect the quality of life for everyone living thing on this planet. In the past, only huge asteroids
crashing through our atmosphere or massive volcano eruptions had the power to alter the climate
and cause mass extinctions of species now this is happening because of our behavior, which is
a result of our thinking. If we change our thinking now, we change our behavior and can thus
preserve our hospitable environment and access to clean water, for many future generations of
humans and numerous other species for thousands, maybe millions of years to come.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
45/56
Water in America 45
References
A Coal-Fired Thermoelectric Power Plant. (2013, November 4). USGS Water Science School.
Retrieved November 5, 2013, from http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/wupt-coalplant-
diagram.html
About CALFED. (2007, January 1). CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Retrieved October 23, 2013,
from http://calwater.ca.gov/calfed/about/index.html
Alaska Baseline Erosion Assessment. (2009, March 1). Climate Change Alaska. Retrieved
October 2, 2013, from
http://www.climatechange.alaska.gov/docs/iaw_USACE_erosion_rpt.pdf
Alaska Impacts & Adaptation. (2013, September 9). EPA. Retrieved October 7, 2013, from
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/impacts-adaptation/alaska.html
Albakkar, Y., & Brown, C. (2011, August 23). The Jordan River: Declining, Disappearing,
Endangered.Revolve. Retrieved October 9, 3013, from http://www.revolve-
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
46/56
Water in America 46
magazine.com/home/2011/08/23/jordan-river-endangered/
Alcoa's Reynobond with EcoClean, Powered by Hydrotect. (2012, January 1). Alcoa's
Reynobond with EcoClean, Powered by Hydrotect. Retrieved October 23, 2012, fromhttp://www.alcoa.com/bcs/aap_eastman/ecoclean/en/home.asp
Arctic Oscillation switches to negative phase. (2013, January 8).NSIDC Arctic News and
Analysis RSS. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2013/01/arctic-oscillation-switches-to-negative-phase/
Bishop, P. (2006, February 1). A Short Review of Pennsylvania Water Law. PA Department of
Environmental Protection. Retrieved November 2, 2013, from
http://files.dep.state.pa.us/Water/BSDW/WaterAllocation/water_law_review_022806.pd
f
Blunden, J., & Arndt, D. (2013). State of the Climate in 2012. Boston: Bulletin American
Meteorological Society.
Cal-Adapt.org. (2013, January 1). Securing an Adequate Water Supply. Retrieved October 13,
2013, from http://cal-adapt.org/blog/2011/apr/12/securing-adequate-water-supply/
Cal-Adapt.org. (2013, January 1). Electricity Demand. Retrieved October 13, 2013, from
http://cal-adapt.org/blog/2011/apr/13/electricity-demand/
Citizen's guide to Colorado's interstate compacts. (2010). Denver, Colo.: Colorado Foundation
for Water Education.Courcier, R., Venot, J., & Molle, F. (2005).Historical
transformations of the Lower Jordan River Basin changes in water use and projections
(1950-2025). Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine Counties groundwater development project final environmental
impact statement: executive summary. (2012). Reno, NV: U.S. Dept. of the Interior,
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
47/56
Water in America 47
Bureau of Land Management, [Nevada State Office].
Doucleff, M. (2012, November 9). Sky-High Vegetables: Vertical Farming Sprouts In Singapore.
NPR. Retrieved September 21, 2013, fromhttp://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/11/06/164428031/sky-high-vegetables-vertical-
farming-sprouts-in-singapore
Drought - September 2013. (2013, October 1).National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).
Retrieved October 14, 2013, from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/drought/
Drought in California. (2012, September 1). California Department of Water Resources Natural
Resources Agency. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from
http://www.water.ca.gov/waterconditions/drought/docs/Drought2012.pdf
Energy and Water: Implications for Energy Development. (2010, April 7).A Look at
Thermoelectric Demand for Water. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from
http://www.eia.gov/conference/2010/session10/wright.pdf
Environmental Fact Sheet. (2010, June 1).New Hampshire State. Retrieved November 3, 2013,
fromhttp://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/factsheets/dwgb/documents/dwgb-
22-13.pdf
Feng, M., McPhaden, M., Hafner, J., & Xie, S. (2013, February 14). La Nina forces
unprecedented Leeuwin Current warming in 2011.Nature.com. Retrieved October 11,
2013, from http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130214/srep01277/full/srep01277.html
Fishman, C. (2011). The big thirst: the secret life and turbulent future of water. New York: Free
Press.
Franco, G., & Sanstad, A. (2006, February 1). CLIMATE CHANGE AND ELECTRICITY
DEMAND IN CALIFORNIA. California Climate Change Center. Retrieved September
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
48/56
Water in America 48
21, 2013, from http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-500-2005-201/CEC-
500-2005-201-SF.PDF
Fumero, J. J. (2002). Florida Water Law 101. Davie, FL: South Florida Water ManagementDistrict.
Grantham, J. B., & Wolfe, D. (2011). Synopsis of Colorado water law(Rev. ed.). Denver, CO:
Colorado Division of Water Resources.
Group. (2013, July 1). Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Economic Value of the Alaska
Seafood Industry. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from
http://pressroom.alaskaseafood.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/AK-Seafood-Impact-
Report-Final-9_16-Online.pdf
Hydropower. (2011, September 1). Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Retrieved October
11, 2013, from http://www.c2es.org/technology/factsheet/hydropower
INTRODUCTION TO "FACTS ABOUT THE U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM. (2013,
September 17).NASA QUEST. Retrieved October 13, 2013, from
http://quest.nasa.gov/antarctica/background/NSF/facts/fact01.html
Israel. (2012, December 31). World Bank Data. Retrieved October 5, 2013, from
http://data.worldbank.org/country/israel
Jordan. (2013, December 31). World Bank Data. Retrieved October 5, 2013, from
http://data.worldbank.org/country/jordan
Juday, G. P. (1998, April 1). Department of Forest Sciences. Spruce Beetles, Budworms, and
Climate Warming. Retrieved October 3, 2013, from
http://www.cgc.uaf.edu/newsletter/gg6_1/beetles.html
Kenny, J. F., Barber, N., Hudson, S., Linsey, K., Lovelace, J., & Maupin, M. (2009). Estimated
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
49/56
Water in America 49
use of water in the United States in 2005 . Reston, Va: U.S. Geological Survey.
Kyle, R. E., & Brabets, T. P. (2001). Water temperature of streams in the Cook Inlet basin,
Alaska, and implications of climate change. Anchorage, Alaska: U.S. Dept. of theInterior, U.S. Geological Survey ;.
Leonhardt, D. (2011, May 3). The Big Thirst: The Future of Water. Economix The Big
Thirst The Future of Water Comments. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/the-big-thirst-the-future-of-water/?_r=0
Markham, D. (2012, July 12). New Desalination Technology Achieves 99% Water Recovery
Rate at Bottling Plant. TreeHugger. Retrieved October 30, 2013, from
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/new-desalination-technology-achieves-99-
water-recovery-rate-bottling-plant.html
Mount Rainer. (2013, October 17).National Parks Service. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from
http://www.nps.gov/mora/naturescience/glaciers.htm
National Overview - September 2013. (2013, October 1).National Climatic Data Center
(NCDC). Retrieved October 4, 2013, from
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2013/9
National Park Service - What is a Water Right?. (2012, December 13).NPS: Explore Nature
Water Water Rights About. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from
http://www.nature.nps.gov/water/waterrights/about.cfm
ODOE: Climate Change in Oregon House Bill 3543: Global Warming Actions. (2007,
September 1). ODOE: Climate Change in Oregon House Bill 3543: Global Warming
Actions. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from
http://www.oregon.gov/energy/GBLWRM/Pages/HB3543.aspx
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
50/56
Water in America 50
Oregon Global Warming Commission. (2013, August 1).Report to the Legislature.
Retrieved September 17, 2013, from
http://www.keeporegoncool.org/sites/default/files/ogwc-standard-documents/OGWC_2013_Rpt_Leg.pdf
Osbourne, S., & Crouch, J. (2013, January 7). News & Features | NOAA Climate.gov.News &
Features | NOAA Climate.gov. Retrieved October 7, 2013, from
http://www.climate.gov/news-features/features/wide-margin-2012-was-united-
states%E2%80%99-warmest-year-record
Patterns in Arctic Weather and Climate. (2013, September 1).All About Arctic Climatology and
Meteorology. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/arctic-
meteorology/weather_climate_patterns.html
Pennington, J. A., & Douglass, J. S. (2005).Bowes & Church's food values of portions
commonly used(18th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Priscolli, Jerome. "Watch Resource Management_ Jerry Delli Priscoli on Water, Technology,
and Conflict | CSIS Video Episodes | Blip." Watch the Best in Online Video Web Series
for Free | Blip. N.p., 26 Aug. 2010. Web. 18 Sept. 2012. .
Reduced Snow Pack and Earlier Runoff. (2013, September 1). Climate Change Effects.
Retrieved October 11, 2013, from
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/climatechange/reducedsnow_more.htm
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., & Liverman, D. (2011). Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges
and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rinat, Z. (2013, January 16). Is the Red Sea-Dead Sea canal about to become reality?.
8/13/2019 Water in America: The Next Crisis
51/56
Water in America 51
Haaretz.com. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/is-the-red-sea-dead-sea-canal-about-to-become-
reality.premium-1.494217Santa Clara Valley Water District. (2013, January 1). SacramentoSan Joaquin River Delta -.
Retrieved October 25, 2013, from http://www.valleywater