+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the...

Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the...

Date post: 21-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
268
Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network (HTLN) of the US National Park Service: CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK May 2006 Donald G. Huggins Robert C. Everhart Debra S. Baker Robert H. Hagen Central Plains Center for BioAssessment Kansas Biological Survey University of Kansas Takeru Higuchi Building 2101 Constant Avenue, Room 35 Lawrence, KS 66047-3759 This report was produced under the cooperative agreement between the University of Kansas Center for Research and the National Park Service (Coop. Agreement #H6067B10031).
Transcript
Page 1: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network (HTLN) of the US National Park Service:

CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK

May 2006

Donald G. Huggins Robert C. Everhart

Debra S. Baker Robert H. Hagen

Central Plains Center for BioAssessment Kansas Biological Survey

University of Kansas Takeru Higuchi Building

2101 Constant Avenue, Room 35 Lawrence, KS 66047-3759

This report was produced under the cooperative agreement between the University of Kansas Center for Research and the National Park Service (Coop. Agreement #H6067B10031).

Page 2: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of a cooperative agreement between the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network (HTLN) of the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) and the Central Plains Center for BioAssessment (CPCB) at the Kansas Biological Survey (KBS), relevant water quality standards, biological & physical habitat sampling methods, biological criteria, methods for determining reference conditions, and water quality data were examined for each HTLN park service unit. When available, legacy data from the NPS and other relevant agencies (e.g. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, etc.) were compiled into a relational database and analyzed in order of HTLN priority. This document constitutes the water quality analysis portion for Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA). Listed in order of rank, priorities for this park (as identified by HTLN) were: habitat (rivers and streams); pathogens (rivers and streams)*; amphibians (wetlands); nutrient loading and cycling (wetlands); toxicity (rivers and streams)*; macroinvertebrates (rivers and streams); core elements (rivers and streams)*; nutrient loading (rivers and streams); water level/discharge*; fish; metal contamination (rivers and streams)*; core elements (wetlands); sediment toxicity (rivers and streams); fluvial geomorphology (rivers and streams); water clarity (rivers and streams)*. Priorities marked with an asterisk had statistically viable data for at least one relevant parameter and were included in the analyses of this report. The Cuyahoga River is the only waterbody in the park study area with specific uses designated by the state of Ohio. These designated uses are: Warmwater Habitat, Agricultural Water Supply, Industrial Water Supply, Primary Contact Recreation, State Resource Water. Secondary contact recreation standards were also considered. All segments of the Cuyahoga River within the park study area were listed as impaired for aquatic life and human health (fish tissue), with 3 of 6 assessment units also listed as impaired for recreation use. Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly 3 miles upstream and 1 mile downstream from the park boundary), 117,288 records of 250 parameters at 139 stations were suitable for meaningful statistical analyses. The period of record for raw, unfiltered data was from 16 September 1922 to 17 October 2005. Analyses were performed to examine three general areas: core elements (as identified by NPS servicewide), priority concerns (as identified by HTLN), and potential concerns (as determined by comparison of data with relevant criteria). The core elements – alkalinity, pH, specific conductance (conductivity), dissolved oxygen, water temperature, and flow – were all within acceptable ranges for flowing water systems. Of the priority concerns, stream pathogens (as indicated by Escheria coli, fecal coliforms, and total coliforms), nutrients (as indicated by total nitrogen and total phosphorus), stream toxics (specifically arsenic), and metals (aluminum, manganese, and cadmium) all appear to be consistently above criterion limits for some portion of the year in some park waterbodies. However, elevated values for arsenic and metals may either be the result of actual in situ concentrations or relatively high detection and reporting

Page 3: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

ii

limits in some sampling methods. Further analysis is required to discern this difference. Potential concerns identified by comparison with federal criteria are total phosphorus, toxic non-metals (arsenic and cyanide), potential pathogens (specifically E. coli), and toxic metals (cadmium, lead, and copper). Turbidity was also identified as a potential concern at relatively few locations. Park managers should consider including these elements in future research programs. In addition to these findings, the following recommendations are made: exchange information with other agencies (especially Ohio EPA and USGS) that study park-related waters; relate sampling locations to relevant regulatory waterbody segments; be sure to document and standardize metadata; standardize database files; be sure to uniquely define sampling locations; establish a sampling design for long-term trend analysis; take hardness measurements concurrently with metals; take pH and temperature measurements concurrent with ammonia; develop study areas along watershed boundaries; and correlate water quality parameters with actual park use.

Page 4: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

iii

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. i Table of Contents............................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iv OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 1

Project Scope .................................................................................................................. 1 DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING........................................................................ 2

Data Collection ............................................................................................................... 2 Sources........................................................................................................................ 2 Conversion .................................................................................................................. 2 Database Development ............................................................................................... 3

Data Handling ................................................................................................................. 3 Location Identification and Handling ......................................................................... 3 Water Quality Data Screening .................................................................................... 4 Output for Analysis..................................................................................................... 5 Core Elements Data .................................................................................................... 5 Priority Concerns Data................................................................................................ 5 Potential Concerns Data.............................................................................................. 5

Statistical Analysis and Methodology ............................................................................ 8 Box Plots..................................................................................................................... 8 Violin Plots ................................................................................................................. 9 Error Bar Plots .......................................................................................................... 10 Scatter Plots .............................................................................................................. 10

PARK SPECIFIC INFORMATION................................................................................. 12 Background Information and Designated Uses ............................................................ 12 Park Map and Stations Included in Analysis ................................................................ 12 Identified Priority Concerns.......................................................................................... 18 List of Impaired Waterbodies ....................................................................................... 19

WATER QUALITY CONCERNS ANALYSIS .............................................................. 22 Analytical Background for Cuyahoga Valley National Park........................................ 22 Assessment of Core Factors.......................................................................................... 24 Assessment of Priority Concerns .................................................................................. 26

Assessment of Water Clarity and Pathogens ............................................................ 27 Assessment of Nutrient Loading and Non-Metal Toxicity....................................... 28 Assessment of Metals with Hardness-Independent Toxicity.................................... 30 Assessment of Metals with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity ...................................... 31

Core Elements Figures.................................................................................................. 34 Priority Concerns Figures ............................................................................................. 71

Water Clarity and Pathogens .................................................................................... 72 Nutrient Loading and Non-Metals ............................................................................ 83 Metals with Hardness-Independent Toxicity ............................................................ 90

Page 5: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

iv

Metals with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity .............................................................. 97 Assessment of Potential Concerns .............................................................................. 112

Background and Intent of Analysis......................................................................... 112 Method of Analysis................................................................................................. 113 Park Specific Potential Concerns............................................................................ 114

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 149 REFERENCES CITED................................................................................................... 151 APPENDIX A: CPCB Algorithm for Location Grouping.............................................. A-1 APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database......................................... B-1 APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis.......................................... C-1 APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria and their Respective Sources ...................... D-1

Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity ....... D-1 Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity........ D-11

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Potential Concerns Exceedance Data ...............................................................................................................................E-1 Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter .........................................................................................................................................E-1 Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter ...................................................................................................................E-10

List of Tables Table 1. Data Screen Report. ............................................................................................. 7 Table 2. Analysis Group Data Report................................................................................ 7 Table 3. Waterbodies and their designated uses for this park service unit. ...................... 12 Table 4. Hydrologic seasons determined for this park service unit. ................................ 12 Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit. ............................................ 14 Table 6. Identified concerns and their respective priority ranks for this park service unit.

................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 7. 303(d) Prioritized impaired waters (Category 5) after Ohio EPA. .................... 20 Table 8. Potential benchmark values for nutrient stressors and other associated variables

derived using multiple approaches............................................................................ 29 Table 9. Included criteria for potential concern analysis. .............................................. 112 Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and

parameter................................................................................................................. 117 Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody,

location, and parameter. .......................................................................................... 126

List of Figures Figure 1. Schematic of Data Screening Process for Analysis............................................ 6 Figure 2. Common features of statistical graphic techniques used in this report. ........... 11 Figure 3. Map of the Cuyahoga Valley National Park and associated study area. .......... 13 Figure 4. Box plots of total alkalinity for main stem and point sources by station. ........ 35 Figure 5. Box plots of total alkalinity for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa

Creek by station. ....................................................................................................... 36

Page 6: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

v

Figure 6. Box plots of total alkalinity for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station........................................................................................................ 37

Figure 7. Box plots of total alkalinity for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station. ......................................................................... 38

Figure 8. Violin plots of total alkalinity for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 39

Figure 9. Temporal distribution of total alkalinity for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 40

Figure 10. Box plots of pH for main stem and point sources by station.......................... 41 Figure 11. Box plots of pH for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by

station........................................................................................................................ 42 Figure 12. Box plots of pH for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by

station........................................................................................................................ 43 Figure 13. Box plots of pH for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous

tributaries by station.................................................................................................. 44 Figure 14. Violin plots of pH for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. ....... 45 Figure 15. Temporal distribution of pH for different waterbody types by hydrologic

season........................................................................................................................ 46 Figure 16. Box plots of specific conductance for main stem and point sources by station.

................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 17. Box plots of specific conductance for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and

Chippewa Creek by station. ...................................................................................... 48 Figure 18. Box plots of specific conductance for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and

Mud Brook by station. .............................................................................................. 49 Figure 19. Box plots of specific conductance for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and

miscellaneous tributaries by station. ......................................................................... 50 Figure 20. Violin Plots of specific conductance for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 51 Figure 21. Temporal distribution of specific conductance for different waterbody types

by hydrologic season................................................................................................. 52 Figure 22. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for main stem and point sources by station... 53 Figure 23. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and

Chippewa Creek by station. ...................................................................................... 54 Figure 24. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and

Mud Brook by station. .............................................................................................. 55 Figure 25. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and

miscellaneous tributaries by station. ......................................................................... 56 Figure 26. Violin plots of dissolved oxygen for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 57 Figure 27. Temporal distribution of dissolved oxygen for different waterbody Types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 58 Figure 28. Box plots of water temperature for main stem and point sources by station. 59 Figure 29. Box plots of water temperature for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and

Chippewa Creek by station. ...................................................................................... 60 Figure 30. Box plots of water temperature for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and

Mud Brook by station. .............................................................................................. 61

Page 7: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

vi

Figure 31. Box plots of water temperature for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station. ......................................................................... 62

Figure 32. Violin plots of water temperature for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 63

Figure 33. Temporal distribution of water temperature for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 64

Figure 34. Box plots of mean daily flow for main stem and point sources by station. ... 65 Figure 35. Box plots of mean daily flow for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and

Chippewa Creek by station. ...................................................................................... 66 Figure 36. Box plots of mean daily flow for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud

Brook by station........................................................................................................ 67 Figure 37. Box plots of mean daily flow for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and

miscellaneous tributaries by station. ......................................................................... 68 Figure 38. Violin plots of mean daily flow for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody

type............................................................................................................................ 69 Figure 39. Temporal distribution of mean daily flow for different waterbody types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 70 Figure 40. Violin plots of turbidity for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

................................................................................................................................... 73 Figure 41. Temporal distribution of turbidity for different waterbody types by hydrologic

season........................................................................................................................ 74 Figure 42. Violin plots of Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 75 Figure 43. Temporal distribution of Escheria coli counts for different waterbody types

by hydrologic season................................................................................................. 76 Figure 44. Violin plots of in situ Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 77 Figure 45. Temporal distribution of in situ Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic

seasons by waterbody type........................................................................................ 78 Figure 46. Violin plots of fecal coliform counts for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 79 Figure 47. Temporal distribution of fecal coliforms for different waterbody types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 80 Figure 48. Violin plots of total coliforms for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody

type............................................................................................................................ 81 Figure 49. Temporal distribution of total coliforms for different waterbody types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 82 Figure 50. Violin plots of total nitrogen for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody

type............................................................................................................................ 84 Figure 51. Temporal distribution of total nitrogen for different waterbody types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 85 Figure 52. Violin plots of total phosphorus for different hydrologic seasons by

waterbody type.......................................................................................................... 86 Figure 53. Temporal distribution of total phosphorus for different waterbody types by

hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 87

Page 8: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

vii

Figure 54. Violin plots of total arsenic for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 88

Figure 55. Temporal distribution of total arsenic for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 89

Figure 56. Violin plots of total aluminum for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 91

Figure 57. Temporal distribution of total aluminum for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 92

Figure 58. Violin plots of total manganese for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 93

Figure 59. Temporal distribution of total manganese for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 94

Figure 60. Violin plots of total mercury for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 95

Figure 61. Temporal distribution of total mercury for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 96

Figure 62. Violin plots of total cadmium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type............................................................................................................................ 98

Figure 63. Temporal distribution of total cadmium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season...................................................................................................... 99

Figure 64. Violin plots of total chromium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.......................................................................................................................... 100

Figure 65. Temporal distribution of total chromium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 101

Figure 66. Violin plots of total lead for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.................................................................................................................................. 102

Figure 67. Temporal distribution of total lead for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 103

Figure 68. Violin plots of total nickel for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.......................................................................................................................... 104

Figure 69. Temporal distribution of total nickel for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 105

Figure 70. Violin plots of total selenium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.......................................................................................................................... 106

Figure 71. Temporal distribution of total selenium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 107

Figure 72. Violin plots of total silver for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.................................................................................................................................. 108

Figure 73. Temporal distribution of total silver for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 109

Figure 74. Violin plots of total zinc for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.................................................................................................................................. 110

Figure 75. Temporal distribution of total zinc for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.................................................................................................... 111

Page 9: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

1

OVERVIEW Aquatic and water dependent environments are fundamentally important to the ecological, biological, chemical, and physical integrity of significant portions of lands and waters protected by the U.S. National Park Service (NPS). As part of its mission to preserve and protect these aquatic and water dependent resources, NPS has recognized the need for a plan to ensure the integrity of water quality within park service units over the long term. Accordingly, the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network (HTLN) of the National Park Service began the aquatic component of the Servicewide Inventory and Monitoring Program in FY 2001. As part of this aquatic component, HTLN entered into a cooperative agreement with the University of Kansas’ Central Plains Center for BioAssessment (CPCB) to aid in the development of a comprehensive Network Monitoring Plan. In this endeavor, CPCB’s tasks were: 1) to summarize existing relevant state, national, and tribal water quality standards applicable to waterbodies within each of the HTLN parks, 2) to summarize existing relevant state, national, tribal, and NPS protocols for biological monitoring and to determine, when applicable, whether appropriate methods exist for use by each HTLN park, 3) to recommend monitoring designs based on these findings, 4) to update water quality monitoring data collected for each HTLN park since publication of that park’s NPS Water Resources Division (WRD) Baseline Water Quality Report, where possible, 5) to develop an accessible relational database to house these data, 6) to re-analyze and summarize the collected data to reflect current knowledge of the condition of aquatic resources within each of the HTLN park service units, and 7) to make recommendations regarding future research and monitoring efforts based on the information and experience garnered from the previous steps. The first three steps reside in documents previously submitted by CPCB (Goodrich and Huggins 2003; Goodrich et al. 2004). This report represents the documentation of the latter four steps of the plan development process for this park unit.

Project Scope The intent of this report is to provide further data and analyses regarding the water quality of each HTLN park service unit beyond the published WRD Baseline Water Quality Report, where possible. In the cases where a Baseline Water Quality Report had not yet been published by WRD, an effort was made to collaborate with WRD in order to maximize data continuity. Rather than providing an exhaustive numerical and graphic summary of every parameter monitored at every station, this report focuses on three target areas of water quality in key waterbodies within the park service unit:

1) Core Elements, corresponding with the Servicewide Inventory and Monitoring program’s “Level I” water quality parameters,

2) Priority Concerns identified by HTLN as important for this park service unit, and 3) Potential Concerns as determined by comparison of historic and extant data with

attainment levels identified through the water quality standards review.

Page 10: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

2

DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING

Data Collection Existing water quality and station location data were collected for the 15 Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network (HTLN) park service units. Additional data beyond those available from the NPS Baseline Water Quality Inventory and Analysis Reports (Baseline Reports) were included from various federal (e.g., USGS) and state (e.g., ARDEQ) agency sources, beginning with the earliest records available in the Baseline Reports and continuing through 2001 where available. Usable records include five general types of information: where the sampling event occurred, when the sampling event occurred, what was measured, the measured value, and additional information regarding the sampling event or measurement. In order to determine long-term trends, it is essential that sampling locations and sampling dates and times be clearly recorded. Future efforts by the park unit should take special care in accurately and precisely defining station locations and relating them to specific segments of park waterbodies identified by relevant state and federal regulatory agencies.

Sources Water quality and station location data were collected from five primary sources: 1) NPS Baseline Reports, 2) USEPA’s STORET database, 3) NPS (either from the Water Resources Division, HTLN, or individual park service units), 4) state agencies (e.g., ARDEQ, MODNR), and 5) USGS’s National Water Information System. For parks with little available data, notably Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield (WICR), additional data were available from published academic studies. The older data were made available in a variety of electronic and/or hard copy formats, depending on the source. For example, data gathered by ARDEQ for several parks in Arkansas were available in relational database (MS Access 2000) files, whereas data from USGS were available for download in tab-delimited flat ASCII files, and data for WICR were provided both in written reports and multiple spreadsheet (MS Excel 2000) files.

Conversion Because water quality data came in widely varying formats from diverse sources, significant effort was required to convert data into a common format for inclusion in a relational database. Semi-automated processes were developed for converting data files where possible, but due to inconsistencies between and within files, often even those for the same location from the same agency, manual format and field name conversions were necessary. In addition, station location information had to be manually verified to avoid duplication of locations and records. Station locations were assigned to new or correlated with existing NPS Station Identification Numbers, and parameters were correlated with Parameter Codes corresponding to USEPA’s STORET database. To facilitate interpretation and summary of the results, stations were also grouped by the waterbody to which they belong (e.g., all of the stations known to be on the same creek were coded the same) and by the waterbody type (i.e., “Main Stem,” “Tributaries,” “Springs,” “Lentic

Page 11: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

3

Waters,” or “Point Sources”). Observations were also coded for the Hydrologic Season in which they occurred, established either by the park-specific Baseline Report, or by separate hydrologic analysis.

Database Development As part of the cooperative agreement between NPS and CPCB, a relational database incorporating the collected data for this park service unit was developed in MS Access 2000 format, based on the NPS National Relational Database Template and input from HTLN. A copy of this database is provided with this report. As with any study that uses data from a wide range of sources, gathered and compiled in a wide range of formats, significant time and effort is required in the initial construction of the database. Rigorous file naming standards and metadata collection procedures are required for automation of such tasks. At this time, sufficient consistency in file format and naming conventions does not exist to automate data collection from these sources. As a general recommendation, future databases, including georeferenced databases, should be fully standardized and rigorously maintained to insure the possibility of transfer between database file formats.

Data Handling

Location Identification and Handling Correct assignment of sample locations is a particular challenge for water quality records. For database purposes, the location recorded in the field by GPS or other means is a sampling event attribute subject to a variety of errors (in GPS calibration, transcription of readings, or differences in where the reading was recorded). In older records, location data may have been taken from a map with limited spatial resolution. There can be difficulties even when location information is correct. Distinct sites that are close together may be located in the same section of a waterbody, which may or may not make them analytically unique. CPCB has established stream site grouping rules for the purposes of analysis. Summarized in Appendix A, these rules underline the importance of using GIS to validate location information. Future studies could use a similar approach for lake and reservoir sites. Site identification is a time-consuming task, but one that may become more feasible for NPS units as GIS coverages become more complete and accessible. For purposes of this project, we reviewed sites previously included in the baseline reports for each park unit. Often sites that were actually the same appeared as different, due to misspellings or other data entry errors. In other instances, sites with similar names were ambiguous due to poor or incomplete spatial information. In all cases, sample sites added from other data sources were matched with previous sites by site description or agency site codes, which were included in the data records’ “Other Names” field. After careful inspection, sites that appeared to be the same were assigned to the same location, with original site attribution retained in the database records’ “EventID” field. A related challenge is definition of the relevant water quality sample area for individual NPS units. For the baseline reports, a “study area” was defined as 3 miles upstream and

Page 12: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

4

1 mile downstream of park boundaries. For these analyses, the same, arbitrary boundaries as those in the baseline reports were used for including additional sites. It would be preferable to base the study area on actual watershed boundaries, but that was beyond the scope of this project.

Water Quality Data Screening Once the gathered water quality data were compiled and converted into a relational database format, data screening was used to ensure data quality. Screening was executed as a layered approach (Figure 1), using multiple screens to remove data unsuitable for statistical analysis. All screens are included as select queries in the relational database. Original data, once converted to the relational database format, were termed “Raw Data” and correspond with Data Screen [ 0 ]. These data were the input for Screen [ 1 ], which was an Observation/Parameter Screen. This screen retained records based on two conditions. First, the parameter measured had to be statistically viable (e.g., a concentration as opposed to a narrative or administrative code), and secondly, that there had to be at least five observations of the parameter in the database. A list of the included parameters appears in Appendix C. The output of Screen [ 1 ] was used as the input for Screen [ 2 ], which was a Value Screen. Screen [ 2 ] compared the measured values of parameters in the data remaining after Screen [ 1 ] to pre-determined minima and maxima for the same parameters. The minima and maxima were the same as those listed in the Baseline Reports, Appendix C (“STORET Water Quality Control/Edit Checking”). The output of Screen [ 2 ] was used as the input for Screen [ 3 ], which was a Remark Screen. Screen [ 3 ] compared the accompanying Remark field to a list of statistically viable Remarks to remove composite values, estimated values, species, sex, and administrative information values, and values of known error. The results of Screen [ 3 ] were termed “Data for Analysis” and were comprised the pool of data from which all subsamples for analysis were taken. Remarks for detection limits were not removed by this screen, and detection limits were retained as their full values, rather than as half values as in the Baseline Reports. This approach, though conservative, assumes no information beyond that which is implicit in the data. Screen [ 4 ] is a quality control screen for the data excluded by Screen [ 1 ] through [ 3 ]. The individual sums of the counts of locations, parameters, and records from Screen [ 3 ] and Screen [ 4 ] should equal the counts of locations, parameters, and records from the Raw Data (Screen [ 0 ]), respectively. The periods of record may differ slightly, as included data may have been gathered over a different period of time than excluded data (and vice versa). A Data Screen Report (Table 1) for this park service unit is included to show the results of data screening.

Page 13: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

5

Output for Analysis Once the “Data for Analysis” were obtained via the screening process detailed above, they were subsampled for three specific types of analysis: Core Elements Analysis, Priority Concerns Analysis, and Potential Concerns Analysis. These analyses correspond to the major analysis sections of this report. An Analysis Group Data Report (Table 2) for this park service unit is included to show the results of data subsampling. Specific information regarding the nature and methods of these analyses are provided in the relevant analysis sections of this report.

Core Elements Data For the Core Elements Analysis, data were subsampled from the “Data for Analysis” by matching parameters with indicators of the NPS defined “Level I” Water Quality Parameters identified by the Servicewide Inventory and Monitoring Program for “Key” waterbodies, namely alkalinity, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and flow. Rapid bioassessment baseline data were generally unavailable in sufficiently robust studies for statistical analysis. Where available, they were included. The subsampling for these Core Elements Data was accomplished via a select query, which is included in the relational database for this park service unit. The statistical software package used in the data analyses (Hintze 2004) also required the data format to be rearranged and additional fields (e.g., observation counts by station, stream codes, waterbody codes) added for analysis. These manipulations were carried out via a crosstab query and subsequent data table modifications. A copy of the output file used for analysis (“tblCoreElements_OutToNCSS”) is included in the relational database for this park service unit.

Priority Concerns Data For the Priority Concerns Analyses, data were subsampled from the “Data for Analysis” by matching parameters with indicators for the park service unit’s identified Priority Concerns (Table 6), as provided by direct correspondence with HTLN staff. Similar to the Core Elements Data, subsampling and manipulation for output to NCSS were carried out within the relational database, and a copy of the output file used for analysis (“tblPrimaryConcerns_OutToNCSS”) is included therein.

Potential Concerns Data Unlike the previous analyses, the Potential Concerns Analysis was performed using the relational database software and a spreadsheet. A 2nd Remark Screen was applied to the “Data for Analysis” (Figure 1), to remove all data with remark codes. This was necessary since minimum-reporting limits of certain constituents (e.g., total cadmium) either changed within the period of record or were already above the maximum recommended criterion for those constituents. Once all remarks were removed, including reporting limits, the resulting data were compared with published and developing regional criterion values (USEPA 2004a, b; Huggins 2005) to determine the number and percentage of exceedances of these criteria. The results of these manipulations are included in the relational database for this park service unit (“tblEPACriteriaScreen” and “tblEPACriteriaScreen_HardDep”).

Page 14: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

6

Figure 1. Schematic of Data Screening Process for Analysis. Numbers in parenthesis indicate corresponding screen number in the associated Data Screen Report. Detailed descriptions of each screen and its effects are given in the Data Handling section of this report.

RAW DATA

Obs

erva

tion/

Par

amet

er S

cree

n

Val

ue S

cree

n

Rem

ark

Scr

een

POTENTIAL CONCERNS

DATA

CORE ELEMENTS

DATA

2nd R

emar

k S

cree

n

DATA FOR ANALYSIS

EXCLUDED

DATA

Removed by Screens PRIORITY

CONCERNS DATA

0

1 2 3

4

Page 15: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

7

Table 1. Data Screen Report.

D a t a S c r e e n s 1

[ 0 ] [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ]

RAW DATA OBS/PARM SCREEN

VALUE SCREEN

REMARK SCREEN

EXCLUDED DATA

Number of Locations 227 139 139 139 88

Number of Parameters 473 250 250 250 223

Number of Records 142951 126278 117341 117288 25663

Period of Record

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 04/20/2005

1 Data screens represent the steps for screening data depicted in Figure 1. Screen [ 1 ] screens data for statistically viable parameters with at least 5 observations. Screen [ 2 ] screens data for values within a reasonable range. Screen [ 3 ] screens data for remarks that indicate bad or statistically nonviable observations. Screens [ 1 ] through [ 3 ] are cumulative (i.e. Screen [ 1 ] is used on Raw data, Screen [ 2 ] is used on results of Screen [ 1 ], Screen [ 3 ] is used on results of Screen [ 2 ]). Screen [ 4 ] is for error checking. Values for Raw Data minus those for Screen [ 3 ] should equal Screen [ 4 ]. Please see the data handling and analysis sections of this report for more information on screening and analysis. Table 2. Analysis Group Data Report.

A n a l y s i s G r o u p s 1

CORE ELEMENTS PRIORITY CONCERNS

POTENTIAL CONCERNS

Number of Locations 133 115 139

Number of Parameters 16 146 65

Number of Records 10909 17047 49656

Period of Record 09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

09/16/1922 to 10/17/2005

1 Analysis groups correspond to the primary analysis sections of this report. Data for each of the Analysis Groups are taken from the results of Data Screen [ 3 ] (Table 1), then reduced to those data that correspond to the principal aim of the analysis group (Figure 1). For example, the subset of data from the results of Data Screen [ 3 ] corresponds to measurements of Core Elements and is represented in the Core Elements Analysis Group. Please see the data handling and analysis sections of this report for more information on screening and analysis.

Page 16: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

8

Statistical Analysis and Methodology The statistical analyses for this report were performed using NCSS-PASS statistical software for Windows, developed by Dr. Jerry L. Hintze (Hintze 2004). This software provides a robust platform both for rigorous statistical analyses of flat data files (e.g., dbf files, MS Access data tables, MS Excel spreadsheets, etc.) and extensive visualization capabilities. The development of the specific data files used in each analysis type is described in detail in the Data Handling section of this report. Graphical techniques are uniquely suited to applications in monitoring and management, since they can convey large amounts of significant information and place that information into a concise, relative context. Four graphical methods for data analysis and visualization were used in this project: box plots, violin plots, error bar charts, and scatter plots. For future, more detailed studies of water quality constituents, other statistical techniques may be more appropriate. Where relevant data were either unavailable or too sparse to represent in a meaningful way using these techniques, one of two specific notations were used. The note “NO DATA” indicates that no observations were made for the given category of data. The note “INSUFFICIENT DATA” indicates that only 1 to 4 observations were made for the given category of data (at least 5 data points are required to produce meaningful statistical graphics). In both cases, these notes were added to help identify areas where additional data collection may be appropriate.

Box Plots Box plots of various parameters were produced to analyze and make multiple comparisons between the distributions of parameters between locations. Originally developed by John Tukey (Tukey 1977), box plots have a long history of use by many scientific disciplines (e.g., hydrologists), but ecologists, fisheries biologists, and others interested in environmental assessment and monitoring have only begun to use this powerful graphic technique relatively recently (Karr et al. 1986; Larsen et al. 1986; Plafkin et al. 1989; Ohio EPA 1990; USEPA 1996). In addition to the usual advantages of graphic techniques, box plots provide a concise visual representation of the central tendency and dispersion of the data distribution. Box plots integrate visual effectiveness with numerical information to provide an excellent overview of the data. From a box plot, it is possible to identify many features of the data distribution of a particular variable, including location, spread, skewness, tail length, and outlying data points (Chambers et al. 1983; Hoaglin et al. 1993). Box plots can be calculated to include a number of different positional measures, but typically include the median. In this report, the box plots are configured such that quartiles partition the distribution into four equal parts (Figure 2a). Thus, the box (rectangle) is divided by the median (a line). The top and bottom of the box represent the 75th (upper quartile) and 25th (lower quartile) percentiles, respectively. The length of the box is the interquartile range (IQR), a popular measure of spread. That is, the box represents the middle 50 percent of the data. The box plots in this report also display lines that extend from each end of the box. These lines are often referred to as

Page 17: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

9

“whiskers.” The upper and lower ends of these lines indicate the position of the upper and lower adjacent values. These values represent the largest (upper) and smallest (lower) observation that is either less than or equal to the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the IQR (upper value), or is greater than or equal to the 25th percentile minus 1.5 times the IQR (lower value). Values outside the upper and lower adjacent values are termed “outside” values or “Mild Outliers,” and are represented by green dots. Values outside three IQR’s are termed “Severe Outliers” and are represented as red dots. Box plots are often used for comparing the distribution of several batches of data (e.g., dissolved oxygen for location one versus location two), since they summarize the center and spread of the data. When making strict comparisons among medians from different batches of data (i.e., different locations), a modified box plot called a “notched box plot” is useful. These notches are constructed using the formula: median ± 1.57(IQR / √n), where 1.57 is selected for the 95% level of significance. Therefore, if the notches of two boxes do not overlap, it may be assumed that the medians are significantly different from each other. However, when making multiple comparisons, the notched box plots do not make any adjustment for the multiplicity of tests being conducted. Despite this shortcoming, notched box plots provide a simple, straightforward, and powerful assessment approach. For example, they can help determine if individual locations are members of least impacted reference populations, or if not members, then how far the locations deviate from that reference. Future studies of greater detail should use more formal tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) based on specific study designs to determine whether two or more populations have different mean values for a given parameter. For general assessment of locations on a park unit scale, though, notched box plots provide excellent and easily accessible information.

Violin Plots Many modifications build on Tukey's original box plot. A proposed further adaptation, the violin plot (Figure 2b), pools the best statistical features of alternative graphical representations of batches of data (Hintze and Nelson 1998). It adds the information available from local density estimates to the basic summary statistics inherent in box plots. This marriage of summary statistics and density shape into a single plot provides a useful tool for data analysis and exploration. A violin plot is a combination of a box plot and a kernel density plot. Specifically, it starts with a box plot. It then adds a rotated kernel density plot to each side of the box plot. A kernel density plot can be considered a refinement of a histogram or frequency plot in which individual bin or bar heights are joined by a line plotted using a data “smoothing” technique. In NCSS, the statistical software program used to create violin plots for this report, the violin plots are made by combining a form of box plot with two vertical density traces (frequency distributions). One density trace extends to the left while the other extends to the right. The two density traces are both added to the plot to create symmetry, which makes it easier to compare batches. The violin plot highlights the peaks and valleys of a variable's distribution. The box plots within the density traces were modified slightly by showing the median as a circle and the upper quartile and lower quartile boxes as thickened lines. The upper and lower adjacent values are indicated by the endpoints of thinner lines. Through comparison of this plot with the box plot and frequency

Page 18: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

10

distribution of the same data, it becomes apparent that although the box plot is useful in a lot of situations, it does not represent data that are clustered (multimodal). On the other hand, although the frequency distribution shows the distribution of the data, it is hard to see the mean and spread. The obvious answer to these shortcomings is to combine the two plots. Comparison of the medians, the box lengths (the spread), and the distributional patterns in the data becomes much easier using violin plots.

Error Bar Plots Error bar plots are a graphical technique for condensing discrete ranges of data values into successive categories in order to display potential trends between those categories (Hintze 2004). Error bar plots are a good analytical tool for identification of potential trends in time-series data, because they condense a range of data values from a discrete time period into means for each category of data. In other words, they show a mean value of the given parameter for each time period. They also add error bars to indicate the standard error associated with the calculated mean for each category (Figure 2c). For example, the error bar plots in this report group data by year for a particular parameter, say dissolved oxygen, by waterbody type (main stem, tributary, or spring) and hydrologic season. Then, a mean value for the parameter for each year is produced for each waterbody type and hydrologic season. Error bars are added to the mean to indicate the standard error associated for each calculated annual mean. In addition, the means for each hydrologic season are joined by lines to aid in the general visualization of year-to-year changes. This technique is the first step in identification of both annual trends and areas in which better temporal or sampling resolution may be required to identify any trends. Once potential trends are identified by the error bar plot, further and more formal characterization of those trends may be done using scatter plots and regression analysis.

Scatter Plots Scatter plots are one of the most commonly employed techniques for visualizing the relationships between two variables (Figure 2d). More extensive descriptions of these plots and their properties are available (Chambers et al. 1983; Tabachnick and Fidell 1996). For a given set of paired data points, for example dissolved oxygen concentration and the date of sampling, one value (e.g. dissolved oxygen concentration) is plotted against the other (e.g. date). Typically, two types of relationships become evident in scatter plots: dependent relationships, where the value of one variable depends directly on the other, or correlative relationships, where the value of each variable is related to the other indirectly. However, there may not be any relationship between the variables at all. One of the strengths of the scatter plot is that each paired data point is included, giving a full picture of the spread and distribution of the data. Without extensive prior knowledge of the variables under examination, a potentially correlative relationship, rather than a direct dependence, is generally assumed. This is especially the case in the examination of isolated water quality variables in complex natural systems. By convention, the independent or causal variable is plotted on the abscissa (x-axis) and the dependent or response variable is plotted on the ordinate (y-axis). For the scatter plots in this report, the independent variable is typically the date of the sampling event. Various statistical techniques of regression and smoothing are available to quantify the relatedness of the two variables. The technique used in this report is a simple linear

Page 19: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

11

regression of the ordinate on the abscissa (y on x). This linear regression produces a trend line that describes the nature of the relationship between the variables. The line has a positive slope if an increase in one variable correlates with an increase in the other and a negative slope if an increase in one variable correlates with a decrease in the other. The extent of this correlation is described by a correlation coefficient ranging in value from +1 (perfect positive correlation) to 0 (no correlation) to –1 (perfect negative correlation). The scatter plots in this report are used primarily to illustrate potential trends of specific parameters in different hydrologic seasons through different time periods. This is achieved by plotting the parameters versus time, while changing the symbols for observations in different hydrologic seasons (i.e. using a square or a triangle instead of a circle to mark the point). Often, it is apparent from the scatter plot that data have been collected at different rates through time (many points in one time period, few in another) or that the available data are too few or too widely spaced to provide useful information in regards to annual trends.

a) typical notched box plot b) typical violin plot

c) typical error bar chart d) typical scatter plot Figure 2. Common features of statistical graphic techniques used in this report.

Page 20: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

12

PARK SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Background Information and Designated Uses Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area (CUVA), now Cuyahoga Valley National Park, encompasses approximately 33,000 acres along the banks of the Cuyahoga River in northern Ohio, just upstream from Lake Erie. Officially established as the nation’s 57th national park in 2000, CUVA has a long history of conservation both at the federal and state level. The primary resources of the park are the aquatic resources of the Cuyahoga River and its tributaries, coupled with the surrounding riparian and woodlands. Waters within the park have several designated uses (Table 3), which correspond to specific standards and criteria as outlined in previous reports within this cooperative agreement (Goodrich and Huggins 2003; Goodrich et al. 2004). Typical uses of the park’s resources include boating, swimming, fishing, hiking, biking, skiing, bird watching, golfing, horseback riding and camping. Table 3. Waterbodies and their designated uses for this park service unit. Waterbody Designated Uses Cuyahoga River Warmwater Habitat Agricultural Water Supply Industrial Water Supply Primary Contact Recreation State Resource Water For the purposes of this report, the hydrologic seasons for CUVA (Table 4) were defined the same as those previously developed for the park service unit’s Baseline Report (National Park Service 1995). Table 4. Hydrologic seasons determined for this park service unit. HydroSeasonCode Hydrologic Season Start Date End Date CUVA_hydro1 Normal Flow July 1 October 31 CUVA_hydro2 Ascending Flow November 1 March 14 CUVA_hydro3 Descending Flow March 15 June 30

Park Map and Stations Included in Analysis A map of the park service unit, the study area, the major hydrography, and the stations used in the analyses in this report is included (Figure 3). A list of the station locations included in the analyses of this report, their corresponding identification numbers, and their classification as to waterbody type is also included for reference (Table 5). Although more stations occur in the accompanying relational database and in the available data, only those stations actually used in the analyses of this report are designated on the park service unit map and included in the table of stations. A list of all stations included in the database appears in Appendix B.

Page 21: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

13

Figure 3. Map of the Cuyahoga Valley National Park and associated study area. Not to scale. Study area is roughly defined as three miles upstream and one mile downstream from the park service unit boundary. Where possible, the spatial coverage as defined by the CUVA Baseline Report was used for determining which stations to include. Water quality stations are those used in the analyses of this report. Stations are identified by the numeric portion of their NPSSTATID code. In other words, station 22 on the map has an NPSSTATID of CUVA0022.

Cuyahoga Valley National Park

Page 22: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

14

Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit. NPS

StationID Waterbody

Code Waterbody

Name Station Location Other Names

CUVA0002 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - KENMORE BLVD. (RM 3.60)

F01A03

CUVA0003 Tributaries Wingfoot Lake Outlet

WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET AT MOGADORE RD. (RM 0.53)

F01S95

CUVA0004 Tributaries Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF SOUTH BASIN

F01A14

CUVA0005 Tributaries Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT MASSILLON RD (RM 0.5)

F01S93

CUVA0006 Tributaries Wingfoot Lake Outlet

WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET AT MOUTH - UNNAMED RD.

F01S94

CUVA0007 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - GILCHRIST RD.

F01S87

CUVA0008 Tributaries Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF CENTRAL BASIN

F01A13

CUVA0009 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - UPST NORTON CO.

F01S86

CUVA0010 Tributaries Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT AKRON OH

04205000

CUVA0011 Tributaries Ohio Canal SUMMIT LK NR MIDPOINT AT AKRON OH

410323081324700

CUVA0012 Tributaries Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF NORTH BASIN

F01A12

CUVA0013 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - DST UNIV. MATERIALS

F01S88

CUVA0014 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

MOGADORE RE AB DAM NR MOGADORE OH

410331081223900

CUVA0015 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON- SEIBERLING ST (RM 6.67)

F01S83

CUVA0016 Tributaries Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT AKRON - AT MOUTH

F01S92

CUVA0017 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - MASSILLON RD (RM 7.15)

F01S84

CUVA0018 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L CUYAHOGA R AT MASSILLON RD AKRON OH

04204500

CUVA0019 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CHENEY RD. (RM 8.7)

F01S85

CUVA0020 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L CUYAHOGA R AT MOGADORE OH

04204000

CUVA0021 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - S.R. 532 (RM 11.75)

F01S89

CUVA0022 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - THORNTON ST. (RM 2.22)

F01A04

CUVA0023 Tributaries misc tributary TRIB TO L CUYAHOGA R DST UNION OIL- SOUTHEAST AV

F01S97

CUVA0035 Tributaries Ohio Canal L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - BANK ST. (RM 5.11)

F01S82

CUVA0037 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - CEDAR ST. (RM 1.30)

F01A02

CUVA0039 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

CHESSIE TRIB AT AKRON - EASTWOOD AVE. (RM 0.05)

F01S90

Page 23: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit (continued). 15

NPS StationID

Waterbody Code

Waterbody Name Station Location Other Names

CUVA0040 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - NORTH ST. (EAST)

F01S81

CUVA0042 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - NORTH ST. (RM 0.18)

F01A01

CUVA0043 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CUYAHOGA ST. (RM 2.14)

F01S99

CUVA0044 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - OTTO ST GAGE (RM 1.85)

502080, P0802

CUVA0045 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L CUYAHOGA R BL OHIO CA AT AKRON OH

04205700

CUVA0046 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

CHESSIE TRIB AT AKRON - BRITTAIN RD. (RM 1.61)

F01S91

CUVA0050 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER 380225, 060398000400, 060398044400

CUVA0051 Tributaries Little Cuyahoga River

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - NEAR MOUTH

502180

CUVA0052 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CUYAHOGA ST.

502150

CUVA0053 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT STATION RD. 502170 CUVA0054 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT CUYAHOGA ST

NR AKRON OH 410701081313200

CUVA0057 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - DST GORGE DAM

F01A60

CUVA0061 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT CUYAHOGA FALLS- BROAD BLVD RM=46.2

F01S16

CUVA0062 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. UPST AKRON WWTP - OLD PORTAGE TRAIL

502160

CUVA0063 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT OLD PORTAGE OH

04206000

CUVA0065 Tributaries misc tributary SAND RN AT OLD PORTAGE OH 410817081334700CUVA0067 Tributaries Mud Brook MUD BK AT AKRON-PENINSULA

ROAD NR AKRON OH 04206050

CUVA0069 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. UPST AKRON WWTP - AT TRUNKLINE

502200

CUVA0071 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R NR BOTZUM OH 410915081342100CUVA0074 Tributaries Yellow Creek YELLOW CREEK DST GHENT -

YELLOW CREEK RD. F01P16

CUVA0083 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT BOTZUM - BATH RD.

F01S15

CUVA0085 Tributaries Yellow Creek YELLOW CREEK CUVA_YECR CUVA0086 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT BOTZUM OH 411011081345100CUVA0087 Tributaries misc tributary IRA CREEK CUVA_IRCR CUVA0088 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT IRA OH 04206250 CUVA0089 Point Sources WWTP outfall CUYAHOGA R. DST AKRON

WWTP - IRA RD. 502190

CUVA0090 Main Stem Cuyahoga River IRA ROAD BRIDGE CUVA_IRRO CUVA0095 Tributaries Furnace Run FURNACE RUN CUVA_FURU

Page 24: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit (continued). 16

NPS StationID

Waterbody Code

Waterbody Name Station Location Other Names

CUVA0096 Tributaries Mud Brook MEADOWBROOK LK AB DAM (L-1) NR STOW OH

411205081271300

CUVA0097 Tributaries Furnace Run FURNACE RN AT EVERETT OH 411205081342400CUVA0098 Tributaries Furnace Run FURNACE RUN NR EVERETT -

RIVERVIEW RD. F01P14

CUVA0099 Point Sources WWTP outfall CUYAHOGA R. DST AKRON WWTP - BOLANZ RD (RM 33.2)

502010

CUVA0100 Tributaries Mud Brook POWERS BROOK AT HUDSON DR. (RM 1.37)

F01S48

CUVA0101 Tributaries Mud Brook MUD BROOK AT STOW - SEASONS RD.

F01P25

CUVA0102 Tributaries misc tributary ROBINSON RN AT EVERETT OH 411230081333700CUVA0103 Tributaries misc tributary ROBINSON RUN CUVA_RORU CUVA0104 Tributaries misc tributary LANGES RN AT EVERETT OH 411241081332200CUVA0105 Tributaries misc tributary LANGES RUN CUVA_LARU CUVA0107 Tributaries misc tributary RAILROAD CREEK CUVA_RACR CUVA0109 Tributaries Dickerson Run DICKERSON RUN CUVA_DIRU CUVA0110 Tributaries Dickerson Run DICKERSON RN AT PENINSULA

OH 411306081330700

CUVA0111 Tributaries Salt Run SALT RN AT PENINSULA OH 411311081320400CUVA0112 Tributaries Salt Run SALT RUN CUVA_SARU CUVA0113 Tributaries misc tributary OAK HILL CUVA_OAHI CUVA0114 Tributaries Haskell Run HASKELL RUN CUVA_HARU CUVA0115 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R NR PENINSULA OH 411359081330400CUVA0117 Tributaries Haskell Run HASKELL RN AT PENINSULA OH 411404081324900CUVA0118 Tributaries misc tributary PENINSULA CREEK CUVA_PECR CUVA0119 Tributaries Furnace Run FURNACE RN AT RICHFIELD OH 411425081365100CUVA0120 Main Stem Cuyahoga River STATE ROUTE 303 BRIDGE CUVA_SR_303 CUVA0121 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT PENINSULA OH 04206400 CUVA0122 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT PENINSULA -

S.R. 303 (RM 29.08) F01S14

CUVA0123 Tributaries misc tributary SLIPPER RN AT PENINSULA OH 411431081334400CUVA0124 Tributaries Boston Run BOSTON RN AT PENINSULA OH 411441081324500CUVA0125 Tributaries Boston Run BOSTON RUN CUVA_BORU CUVA0126 Tributaries Brandywine

Creek BRANDYWINE CR 0.05 MI UPSTREAM OF HUDSON WWTP

F01W09

CUVA0127 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CRK NR HUDSON - HINES HILL RD RM=7.02

F01W11

CUVA0128 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT BOSTON MILLS RD.

F01A58

CUVA0129 Main Stem Cuyahoga River BOSTON MILLS ROAD BRIDGE CUVA_BOMI CUVA0130 Tributaries Spring Creek SPRING CUVA_SPCR CUVA0130a Tributaries Spring Creek Upper Spring Creek, NPS monitoring

site

CUVA0131 Tributaries Spring Creek SPRING RN NR PENINSULA OH 411557081335100

Page 25: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit (continued). 17

NPS StationID

Waterbody Code

Waterbody Name Station Location Other Names

CUVA0132 Tributaries misc tributary COLUMBIA RUN CUVA_CORU CUVA0133 Tributaries Brandywine

Creek BRANDYWINE CREEK AT BRANDYWINE RD. (RM 1.95)

F01W16

CUVA0134 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE C AT BOSTON HEIGHTS OH

411636081321800

CUVA0135 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK AT SOLON - PETTIBONE RD.

F01P38

CUVA0137 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK NR MOUTH - TECUMSEH DR.

502040

CUVA0138 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK CUVA_BRCR

CUVA0140 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE C NR JAITE OH 04206420

CUVA0141 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT JAITE - VAUGHN RD. (RM 24.10)

F01S13

CUVA0144 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK AT AKRON-CLEVELAND RD. (RM 3.7)

F01P36

CUVA0145 Tributaries Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CR JUST UPSTREAM OF MACEDONIA WWTP

F01W13

CUVA0146 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT JAITE OH 411747081341300CUVA0147 Tributaries misc tributary CENTRAL MAINTENANCE AREA

CREEK CUVA_CMAC

CUVA0149 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R NR BRECKSVILLE OH

411901081350700

CUVA0151 Tributaries Chippewa Creek CHIPPEWA CREEK CUVA_CHCR CUVA0152 Tributaries Chippewa Creek CHIPPEWA C AT RIVERVIEW

ROAD NR BRECKSVILLE OH 04206450

CUVA0153 Tributaries misc tributary STONE ROAD CUVA_STRO CUVA0154 Tributaries Chippewa Creek CHIPPEWA C AT BRECKSVILLE

OH 411913081371900

CUVA0158 Tributaries misc tributary UNAMED TR TO CUYAHOGA R AT INDEPENDENCE OH

412105081353200

CUVA0159 Tributaries misc tributary SAGAMORE CREEK CUVA_SACR CUVA0160 Tributaries misc tributary UNAMED TR TO CUYAHOGA R NR

NORTHFIELD OH 412118081334300

CUVA0161 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R NR INDEPENDENCE OH

412124081355200

CUVA0162 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT FITZWATER RD. (RM 17.30)

F01S12

CUVA0163 Tributaries misc tributary BROOKSIDE ROAD CUVA_BRRO CUVA0164 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK CUVA_TICR CUVA0166 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK AT MOUTH -

CANAL RD. F01S24

CUVA0167 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS C NR INDEPENDENCE OH

04207300

CUVA0172 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK NEAR WALTON HILLS - DUNHAM RD.

F01P37

CUVA0173 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS C AT DUNHAM RD NR INDEPENDENCE OH

412226081344500

Page 26: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 5. Stations used in analyses in this park service unit (continued). 18

NPS StationID

Waterbody Code

Waterbody Name Station Location Other Names

CUVA0179 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CRK UPST BEDFORD HTS WWTP - RICHMOND RD.

F01S27

CUVA0181 Tributaries Deer Lick Run DEER LICK RUN IN BEDFORD RES. - PARK DR RM=0.76

F01S39

CUVA0182 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK AT GLEN WILLOW - DST RICHMOND RD.

502090

CUVA0187 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT HILLSIDE RD. F01S11 CUVA0189 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK DST BEDFORD

HTS. WWTP - DST I-271 F01S26

CUVA0190 Point Sources WWTP outfall MAPLE HEIGHTS STP EFFLUENT 390514 CUVA0191 Tributaries Tinkers Creek HAWTHORNE CREEK JUST UPST

BEDFORD HTS. WWTP F01P55

CUVA0192 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS C AT BEDFORD OH 04207200 CUVA0193 Tributaries Tinkers Creek TINKERS CREEK AT BEDFORD -

S.R. 14 (RM 6.32) 502220, P0805

CUVA0194 Point Sources WWTP outfall HAWTHORNE CREEK JUST DST BEDFORD HTS. WWTP

F01P54

CUVA0195 Tributaries misc tributary MAPLE HEIGHTS STP INFLUENT 390513 CUVA0198 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CA AT INDEPENDENCE OH 04207500 CUVA0202 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R AT INDEPENDENCE

OH 04208000

CUVA0203 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. AT INDEPENDENCE - OLD ROCKSIDE RD.

502020, P0801

CUVA0209 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. UPST CONFL MILL CREEK - GRANGER RD.

F01A26

CUVA0212 Tributaries Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT MILL CREEK AQUADUCT RM= 8.41/2.80

F01W52

CUVA0214 Tributaries Mill Creek MILL CREEK AT GARFIELD HTS. - CANAL RD.

502110

CUVA0215 Point Sources WWTP outfall CUYAHOGA R UPST SOUTHERLY WWTP- RR/SR 21 RM=11.3

F01S10

CUVA0221 Point Sources WWTP outfall NEORSD SOUTHERLY WWTP EFFL. CHANNEL AT OUTFALL

F01W48

CUVA0224 Point Sources WWTP outfall CUYAHOGA R. DST SOUTHERLY WWTP - CONRAIL RR

F01S09

CUVA0226 Main Stem Cuyahoga River CUYAHOGA R. UPST CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP

F01A25

CUVA0227 Main Stem Cuyahoga River U.S. STEEL #9 WATER INTAKE 301508 CUVA0228 Point Sources Industrial outfall U.S. STEEL #172 OUTFALL 301506 CUVA0249 Main Stem Cuyahoga River Cuyahoga River at Botzum OH 4206200

Identified Priority Concerns HTLN identified specific priority concerns for CUVA (Table 6). When sufficient data were available, relevant water quality concerns from this list were analyzed and specifically addressed in the Analysis sections of this report.

Page 27: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

19

Table 6. Identified concerns and their respective priority ranks for this park service unit.

Rank Concern Relevant Parameter(s)1

4 Habitat (rivers and streams) Pathogens (rivers and streams)

- 2

Counts of E. coli, Fecal Coliform, and Fecal Streptococci where available

7 Amphibians (wetlands) Nutrient loading and cycling (wetlands) Toxicity (rivers and streams)

- 2 Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorous Pollutants with defined criteria where available

8 Macroinvertebrates (rivers and steams) Core Elements (rivers and streams)

- 2 Identified core elements parameters where available

9 Nutrient loading (rivers and streams) Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorous

10/11 Water level/Discharge Flow (instantaneous and mean daily)

11 Fish Metal contamination (rivers and streams)

- 2 Dissolved and Total Concentrations by Metal where available

12 Core Elements (wetlands) Sediment toxicity (rivers and streams) Fluvial Geomorphology (rivers and streams)

Identified core elements parameters where available - 2 - 2

14 Water Clarity (rivers and streams) Turbidity

1These parameters were analyzed as indicators of their respective concerns. 2Insufficent data for analysis or beyond the scope of this water quality assessment.

List of Impaired Waterbodies At the time of publication of this report, the entirety of the Cuyahoga River within the CUVA study area was listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (Ohio EPA 2006). A summary of impaired segments is included (Table 7), including assessment unit identifications, nature of impairment, and suggested causes and sources of high magnitude impairment to aquatic life.

Page 28: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

20Table 7. 303(d) Prioritized impaired waters (Category 5) after Ohio EPA. 1

Impairment of Water Quality Standards 4

Assessment Unit 2 Assessment Unit Description 3 Aquatic

Life Use Recreation

Use

Human Health (Fish

Tissue) High Magnitude Causes 5 High Magnitude Sources 6

04110002 001 Cuyahoga River Mainstem (downstream Brandywine Cr. to mouth incl. old channel)

X X X – 7 – 7

04110002 030 Cuyahoga River (downstream Breakneck Cr. to downstream Little Cuyahoga R.)

X X Unknown Toxicity Nutrients Siltation Organic Enrichment/DO Flow Alteration Direct Habitat Alterations Total Toxics

Major Municipal Point Source Combined Sewer Overflows Sewer Line Construction Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers

(NPS) Onsite Wastewater Systems

(Septic Tanks) Channelization – Development Dam Construction –

Development Natural

04110002 040 Cuyahoga River (downstream Little Cuyahoga R. to downstream Brandywine Cr.)

X X X Unknown Toxicity Nutrients Organic Enrichment/DO Flow Alteration Direct Habitat Alterations

Major Municipal Point Source Combined Sewer Overflows Land Development/

Suburbanization Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers

(NPS) 04110002 050 Cuyahoga River (downsream

Brandywine Cr. to downstream Tinkers Cr.); excluding Cuyahoga R. mainstem

X X Cause Unknown Nutrients Organic Enrichment/DO Flow Alteration Direct Habitat Alterations Oil and Grease Natural Limits (Wetlands)

Major Municipal Point Sources Land Development/

Suburbanization Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers

(NPS) Onsite Wastewater Systems

(Septic Tanks) Natural Source Unknown

Page 29: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 7. 303(d) Prioritized impaired waters (Category 5) after Ohio EPA. 1 (continued)

21 Impairment of Water Quality Standards 4

Assessment Unit 2 Assessment Unit Description 3 Aquatic

Life Use Recreation

Use

Human Health (Fish

Tissue) High Magnitude Causes 5 High Magnitude Sources 6

04110002 060 Cuyahoga R. (downstream Tinkers Cr. to mouth); excluding Cuyahoga R. mainstem

X X Metals Organic Enrichment/DO Flow Alteration Direct Habitat Alterations

Combined Sewer Overflows Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers

(NPS) Spills

LRAU 8 Cuyahoga River Mainstem (downstream Brandywine Cr. to mouth incl. old channel)

X X X Organic Enrichment/DO Unknown Toxicity Direct Habitat Alterations Total Toxics Unionized Ammonia

Combined Sewer Overflow Major Municipal Point Source Contaminated Sediments Dredging/Development Marinas Spills Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers

(NPS) Streambank Modification/

Destabilization NOTES: 1 Table and notes developed directly from Appendices D.2, E.1, E.2, E.3 from Ohio EPA’s Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (Ohio EPA

2006). 2 Ohio EPA Assessment Unit designation; typically the U.S. Geological Survey’s 11-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) for watershed assessment units and not

recorded for the Large River Assessment Units (LRAU’s) 3 Geographic description of the assessment unit 4 USEPA water quality standard criterion category; X indicates impairment in the category of the respective columns 5 Listing of the most prominent “agents” deemed responsible for the observed aquatic life use impairment in each respective assessment unit 6 Listing of the most prominent origins of the “agents” (high magnitude causes) deemed responsible for the observed aquatic life use impairment 7 Information not detailed in Appendices E.1, E.2, or E.3 of Ohio EPA’s Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (Ohio EPA 2006). 8 Ohio EPA Large River Assessment Unit (LRAU)

Page 30: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

22

WATER QUALITY CONCERNS ANALYSIS

Analytical Background for Cuyahoga Valley National Park A series of core water quality parameters was examined for each park service unit. These parameters included total alkalinity, pH, specific conductance (conductivity), dissolved oxygen, water temperature, and flow (discharge). In those instances where five or more values of a parameter were taken at a site or for a waterbody type, several graphical methods were used to analyze the data. An explanation of these analytical graphing techniques and their uses is provided in the Overview Section of this report. These graphical methods (e.g. box plots, error bar plots) were used to help determine if there were any deviations from expected conditions and to identify potential areas of concern. First, the data were compared for the three waterbody types with data suitable for analysis – main stems, tributaries, and point sources. Second, the data were compared for three hydrological seasons (hydroperiods) – low or normal flow conditions, periods of generally ascending flow, and periods of peak and descending flow. Within the Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA), the low or normal flow period was defined as occurring between July 1 and October 31, the ascending flow period from November 1 to March 14, and the descending flow from March 15 to June 30 (National Park Service 1995). Finally, the data were analyzed over time to assess temporal trends. However, the variability in data collection through time and space for nearly all variables precluded the use of any statistical time-trend analysis. Discharge records at some collection stations were complete enough that some robust trend analysis might be possible. In general, yearly data collections varied in density and sometimes quality, often exhibiting temporal trends that highlight changes in minimum detection or reporting limits for some of the water quality constituents. Because these analyses are conducted on data collected and analyzed by different organizations and laboratories, special attention must be given in interpreting some of the graphs and raw data. Several core parameters were identified by the NPS as important water quality variables that should be collected and assessed by virtually all parks. Three of these common water quality constituents display a high degree of natural variability in time as well as space. Dissolved oxygen, pH, and water temperature levels vary naturally within differing time scales (e.g. hourly, daily, monthly) due to a number of site-specific to watershed- and regional-scale factors including but not limited to primary production, community respiration, instream and near stream habitat, climate, topography and altitude. In order to minimize or account for sources of natural variation in these and other environmental and water quality factors of interest, the timing and frequency of sample collections must be systematic. This is seldom the situation when large, disparate datasets are joined for posteriori analyses. Thus, care must be taken in interpreting the data and assessing possible causal factors related to observed changes. Core factors must be collected in a uniform manner and within regular temporal and spatial frameworks appropriate to the NPS facility and its surrounding landscape (e.g. ecoregion, watershed, hydroperiod). Alkalinity is a measure of the buffering capacity of water, or the capacity of bases to neutralize acids. Measuring alkalinity is important in determining a stream's ability to

Page 31: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

23

neutralize acidic pollution from rainfall or wastewater. Alkalinity does not refer to pH, but instead refers to the ability of water to resist changes in pH. Alkalinity is generally a problem more common in lakes and reservoirs than streams. The most common cause of alkalinity in surface waters is eutrophication that, although a natural process, is accelerated by nutrient pollution and organic enrichment. Because alkalinity varies greatly due to differences in geology, there are no general standards for alkalinity. However, total alkalinity levels of 100-200 mg/L provide for high buffering capacities in streams and thus act to stabilize the pH level in streams. Levels below 10 mg/L indicate that the aquatic ecosystem is poorly buffered, and is very susceptible to changes in pH from natural and human-caused sources. The USEPA pH criteria for freshwater are the value range from 6.5 to 9 pH units. However, this range does not take into account some aquatic waterbody types that are naturally acidic, such as fens and bogs. Specific conductance is a measure of how well water can conduct an electrical current. Conductivity increases with increasing concentrations and mobility of cations and anions found in the water. These ions, which come from the breakdown of compounds, conduct electricity because they are negatively or positively charged when dissolved in water. Therefore, conductivity is an indirect measure of the presence of dissolved solids such as chloride, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and iron, and can be used as an indicator of water pollution. The state of Ohio’s water quality standard for dissolved oxygen (DO) for all but modified warmwater habitats in the Huron/Erie lake plains ecoregion, including surface waters associated with CUVA, is 5.0 mg/L. This state DO standard is the same as the national standard of 5.0 mg/L supported by USEPA. Some states having cold-water ecosystems that support salmonid fisheries and other cold-water communities often have more stringent dissolved oxygen criteria and standards. The water temperature criteria for surface waters of CUVA are the same as those imposed on all waterbodies that occur within the general Lake Erie basin, except for Lake Erie itself. The criteria are actually a series of average and daily maximum values calculated 18 individual time periods within a calendar year (see CUVA review in Goodrich and Huggins 2003). Application of these temperature criteria would demand that each temperature observation in the CUVA database be compared to the respective criteria limit associated with the appropriate time period in which the data were collected. Because of the summary nature of this report, individual station temperatures (daily values) were not compared to criteria established for each separate time period. Rather, the reader is referred to either to Table 8 of section N-10 in Goodrich and Huggins (2003) or the relevant section of Chapter 3745 in the Ohio Administrative Code (Ohio EPA 2002) to make detailed comparisons. Of these criteria, the highest daily maximum temperature limit listed was 29.4 degrees centigrade, which applies to four consecutive time periods beginning on June 16 and ending September 15. This value was used for discussion purposes, since it represents the overall maximum allowable water temperature for all waterbodies. Like DO values, water temperatures associated with many stream and small lake ecosystems can vary greatly during a single day, as well as show the seasonal changes associated with solar radiation and other climate factors.

Page 32: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

24

Assessment of Core Factors In nearly all cases, the observed ranges of the six core water quality parameters were within acceptable ranges for flowing water systems located in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Based on the available data, no major areas of concern regarding core factors for this park were identified. The one possible exception was dissolved oxygen that occasionally showed levels below 5.0 mg/L, a state of Ohio minimum for the protection of aquatic life. These lower dissolved oxygen values occurred principally during low to normal flows (hydroperiod 1). The vast majority of stations had median concentrations for dissolved oxygen above the Ohio criterion level of 5.0 mg/L. However, one main stem station, one point source station, and several tributary stations, including stations on Brandywine, Creek, Little Cuyahoga River, and Ohio Canal, had median values that were below the Ohio criterion limit for DO. Total alkalinity concentrations ranged from about 75 to just over 220 mg/L CaCO3 for the main stem of the Cuyahoga River associated with CUVA (Figure 4). This range was the largest observed for total alkalinity for all waterbodies in the study area. Alkalinity levels for most tributaries and the point source stations tended to occur between 100 and 200 mg/L CaCO3 (Figure 4 – Figure 7). The lowest observed median value for any station was for an unnamed tributary (CUVA0107) and was approximately 40 mg/L CaCO3. Low alkalinity values were also seen in Dickerson Run (CUVA0109). Alkalinity values were highest in the summer and fall during normal flows (hydroperiod 1), with median values occurring between 125 and 175 mg/L CaCO3. Median values for hydroperiods 2 and 3 ranged from about 100 to 138 mg/L CaCO3 (Figure 8). While yearly trends in total alkalinity values were not apparent, beginning in the 1980s there appeared to be a slight but inconsistent increase in total alkalinity values for the tributaries during hydrologic seasons 1 and 3 (Figure 9). Overall, the streams within the CUVA system appear to be sufficiently buffered and thus resistant to alterations in the natural pH and pH flux associated with these systems. The range in pH concentrations for main stem stations was somewhat variable, but median station values remained between 7.5 and 8.5, with point source sites (especially CUVA0228) having somewhat lower median values (Figure 10). Stations CUVA0053, CUVA0202, and CUVA0228 had some of the lowest pH values observed in this assessment, but these low levels were extremely rare. Median concentrations for most tributary stations also fell between 7.5 and 8.5 (Figure 11 – Figure 13). Deer Lick Run had a median value of about 8.5, while the pH value of the upper quartile (75th percentile) was 9.0. Single stations each on Tinkers Creek, Mud Brook, and Ohio Canal, as well as stations CUVA0105 and CUVA0214, all had median concentrations between 7.0 and 7.5. Very little variation in the median values for tributary, point source, and main stem stations was observed in the violin plots grouped by hydroperiod, suggesting that all sites were well buffered with limited responses to changes in flow (Figure 14). During hydroperiods 1 and 2 in all waterbody types, some pH values were observed to drop to below the lower pH criterion level of 6.5. Error bar plots of pH values collected over about 40 years suggested that main stem pH values might have increased over time (Figure 15). However, no data trends were noted for tributaries, and insufficient data prevented meaningful interpretation of point source trends.

Page 33: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

25

Median specific conductance values for Cuyahoga River stations ranged from a low of just under 600 umhos/cm to a high of about 900 umhos/cm, with one station (CUVA0088) having an upper quartile level of over 1000 umhos/cm (Figure 16). Point source specific conductance levels were fairly uniform, and most stations had median concentrations of about 600 to 700 umhos/cm. The median values for stations on Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, Chippewa Creek, Brandywine Creek, and Ohio Canal generally varied from 800 to 1000 umhos/cm, while the median values for Yellow Creek and Little Cuyahoga River ranged between 300 and 800 umhos/cm (Figure 17 – Figure 19). The median concentrations for conductivity for most other tributary station fell within the 300 to 800 umhos/cm range. The exceptions were stations CUVA0102, CUVA0104, and CUVA130a, all of which had median concentrations above 1200 umhos/cm. There was little difference among waterbody types in hydroperiods 1 and 3 (spring through fall), but in the winter or ascending flow period (hydroperiod 2) the point source concentrations dropped to the 200 to 300 umhos/cm range (Figure 20). There were no observable trends in specific conductance levels in any of the waterbody types within the approximate 40-year period of record (Figure 21). Median dissolved oxygen levels were above 5.0 mg/L for all main stem stations except CUVA0149 (Figure 22). This main stem station and one point source station (CUVA0190) had median station values of about 4.0 mg/L. Dissolved oxygen levels in Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, Chippewa Creek, and Yellow Creek were well above the criteria level of 5 mg/L and typically had median values of over 7 mg/L, except at a single station on Tinkers Creek (CUVA0182) (Figure 23, Figure 24). Mud Creek had a median DO value of about 8 mg/L, but the lower quartile (25th percentile) level was very low, approaching hypoxic conditions (Figure 24. Several other tributaries had stations with median concentrations below the criterion value of 5 mg/L (Figure 25). About 13% (2 in 16) of the stations on Little Cuyahoga River, and 38% (3 in 8) to 40% (4 in 10) of the stations on Brandywine Creek and Ohio Canal, respectively, had median values below the 5.0 mg/L limit. Median DO concentrations were above the DO criteria during all hydroperiods, with the high median values occurring in hydroperiod 2 (Figure 26). Dissolved oxygen levels in hydrologic seasons 1 and 3 (i.e. most of the spring, summer, and fall) displayed lower median values (about 8 mg/L) than the median value associated with hydroperiod 2 (winter), which was at or above 11 mg/L (Figure 26). Low DO levels occurred within some main stem and tributary stations during all hydroperiods. Dissolved oxygen levels for point sources typically dropped to their lowest values during hydroperiod 2 (winter). No obvious time trends could be determined in the error bar charts for dissolved oxygen, other than a slight apparent increase in DO levels in the Cuyahoga River over time (Figure 27). However, observation of this trend is speculative. Median water temperature values for main stem stations varied from a low of about 15 (CUVA0052) to a high of 24 (CUVA0057) degrees centigrade (Figure 28). The median values between stations within several individual tributaries (e.g. Brandywine Creek, Little Cuyahoga River, and Ohio Canal) were noted to vary over a large range (7 to 18 degrees), with some stations having median values as low as 5 degrees centigrade and others as high as 23 degrees centigrade (Figure 29 – Figure 31). The causes of some of the noted difference in temperature regimes can only be speculated, but one factor might be biased collecting efforts. Three main stem stations (CUVA0052, CUVA0063, and CUVA0202) had some stream temperature values above 30 degrees centigrade (Figure

Page 34: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

26

28). In general, however, most stations had temperatures below 29.4 degrees centigrade, which is the overall maximum temperature allowed by the state of Ohio for the protection of aquatic life. Except during hydroperiod 2 (winter), the tributaries tended to be somewhat cooler than both point sources and the Cuyahoga River (Figure 32). The violin plots of stream temperatures for each waterbody type by hydroperiod (Figure 32) suggested that the distribution of values was, in most cases, fairly normally distributed around the median values, with the exception of point sources, which often showed a bimodal distribution of values. This distribution indicates that the point sources stations constitute two different temperature groups (also shown in Figure 28). The spread in median values between waterbody types was greatest during the spring or descending flow period (hydroperiod 3), when the main stem was warmer than the tributaries. A slight downward trend in summer and fall temperatures (hydroperiod 1) was noted for both the main stem and tributaries (Figure 33). No trend was noted in waterbody types for the other hydroperiods and little temperature data were available for point sources. Long-term flow data were available for only two main stem stations, two sites each on Tinkers Creek and Little Cuyahoga River, and one station on both Ohio Canal and the Springfield Lake outlet (CUVA0010) (Figure 34 – Figure 37). Median values for the mean daily discharge for the upper and lower sites on the Cuyahoga River were approximately 300 and 800 cfs, respectively. Flow differences between stations within Tinkers Creek were negligible (Figure 35), while medians for mean daily flows in Little Cuyahoga River varied by about 10 cfs (Figure 37). The calculated median value for mean daily flows for the Cuyahoga River varied from a low of approximately 300 cfs in hydroperiod 1 to a high of just over 1000 cfs in hydroseason 3. This same pattern of seasonal variability was also observed for the tributaries, but flow values were about an order of magnitude less (i.e. 30 cfs in hydroperiod 1). Based on mean daily flow records for the Cuyahoga River from 1959 through 1989, flows in all hydroperiods appear to have decreased, especially for winter flows (Figure 39). Conversely, mean flows for tributaries appear to have increased over time; however, the period of record was much shorter for these waterbodies (14- verses 30-year span). No explanation for these observations is readily discernible, other than the possibility that the data may not represent true trends.

Assessment of Priority Concerns The priority variables associated with the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, in order of importance, are habitat in rivers and streams, stream pathogens, wetland amphibians, nutrient loading and cycling in wetlands, non-metal toxicity in rivers and streams, macroinvertebrates in rivers and streams, core elements for rivers and streams, nutrient loading in streams and rivers, water levels/discharge, fish, metal contamination, core elements for wetlands, sediment and stream water toxicity, fluvial geomorphology and water clarity (Table 6). Discharge (i.e. daily flows) and other core elements are discussed in the core element section above. Of the remaining priority concerns, data were available to characterize stream pathogens, and some non-metal and metal toxic contaminants in the Cuyahoga River and some of its tributaries. Core elements data for streams and rivers, as well as some nutrient data, were also available. Water clarity (i.e. turbidity) as a concern was grouped within the non-metal toxics section, rather than

Page 35: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

27

assigning it a new section. Stream toxicity is addressed in the context of the metal and non-metal contaminants found in water, but no sediment toxicity data were found for those portions of streams and rivers associated with the park. In general, CUVA concerns were addressed when relevant parameter measures were both available and of sufficient data quality to be used in analyses and discussions (see Table 6).

Assessment of Water Clarity and Pathogens Violin plots of turbidity for both the Cuyahoga River and tributaries associated with CUVA indicated that median turbidity values during all hydrologic seasons (Figure 40) were at or below a regional benchmark of 10.4 NTU (see Table 8 for benchmark information). Typically, during hydroperiods 3 and 1 (spring through fall) most upper quartile (75th percentile) values were above the 10.4 NTU benchmark level for both main stem and tributary stations, with upper values ranging from 20 to 40 NTU. The main stem stations of the Cuyahoga were generally more turbid than tributaries during hydroperiod 2 (winter). No obvious time trends were observed in the turbidity data except for a 6-year jump (1998-2003) in main stem values for all hydroperiods (Figure 41). Distributional analysis of colony count data for Escheria coli from both laboratory-cultured samples and in situ counts were examined to assess spatial and temporal occurrences of this bacterium in waters associated with CUVA. Data from laboratory-cultured samples indicated that during hydroperiod 2, the vast majority of both main stem and tributary samples had E. coli counts above both Ohio primary contact criteria (126/100 mL and not to exceed 298/100 mL in 10% of samples) in the main stem and tributaries (Figure 42). In hydroperiods 1 and 3 the median values for E. coli counts (lab cultured data) from the main stem stations again exceeded both Ohio criteria, but median and lower quartile (25th percentile) values for tributary samples were below one or both criteria levels. E. coli data from in situ cultures in the main stem and tributaries were also compared to lab-cultured values. In situ data were limited, but indicated that E. coli levels in both main stem and tributary samples taken during hydroperiod 1 were higher than both Ohio criteria, as were main stem levels for hydroperiod 3 (Figure 44). E. coli counts based on data obtained using the in situ culture method appeared to be consistently higher than counts from lab-cultured samples during the same hydroperiods for all waterbody groups (Figure 42, Figure 44). As an example, the median count for main stem stations sampled during hydroperiod 1 was approximately 800/100 mL for lab-cultured data, while the in situ median count was 10,000/100 mL. These comparisons indicated that the historic measures of E. coli using standard lab culturing methods could be underestimating environmental levels of E. coli. No trends in E. coli counts were found within the yearly data sets for either lab-cultured or in situ samples (Figure 43, Figure 45). Distribution and median values for fecal coliform bacteria displayed similar abundance patterns for all waterbody types, both within and between hydroperiods (Figure 46). Further, in all hydroperiods main stem values tended to be higher than point source values, which were in turn higher than tributary levels. The highest median levels for fecal coliforms were in the winter (hydroperiod 2), while median values for both the main

Page 36: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

28

stem and point sources fell between the two Ohio standards for primary contact recreation (1000/100 mL and not to exceed 2000/100 mL in 10% of samples) during both hydroperiods 2 and 3. Except during hydroperiod 2, the majority of values of fecal coliforms for tributary samples were below both criteria for this bacterial group. However, most of the upper quartile (75th percentile) values for all waterbodies were found to exceed the most stringent criteria level of 1000/100 mL in the winter (hydroperiod 2). Additional research has confirmed that fecal coliform numbers continue to exceed the 1000/100 mL primary contact recreation criterion between Akron and Cleveland when stream flow is elevated due to rain runoff (Ohio EPA 1999). The majority of main stem stations included in this analysis (e.g.CUVA0202, CUVA0146, CUVA0086) are located within this portion of the Cuyahoga River. A similar finding was reported by the US Geological Survey in an extensive bacteriological survey of the lower Cuyahoga River (Francy et al. 1993). This study concluded that the most significant source of fecal coliform bacteria was from multiple bypasses of the secondary treatment process at the Akron WWTP. Error bar plots of fecal coliform counts for both tributary and main stem groups (Figure 47) showed that in the mid- to late- 1970s, fecal coliform levels were somewhat higher than in other years. A possible second pulse may have also occurred in the early 1990s within the main stem of the Cuyahoga River. Violin plots of total coliform bacteria counts for both main stem and tributary stations show that counts seldom exceeded Ohio’s maximum criterion value of 5000/100 mL for primary contact (Figure 48). Median values for samples collected in hydroperiods 1 and 3 indicated that main stem levels were higher than point source levels, but this pattern was reversed during hydroperiod 2 (winter). Winter samples for E. coli, fecal coliforms and total coliforms were always higher than corresponding levels for other hydroseasons. Meaningful, multi-year trends in total coliforms were indiscernible, as only one to two years of data could be plotted (Figure 49).

Assessment of Nutrient Loading and Non-Metal Toxicity The USEPA is currently supporting the development of numeric criteria for nutrients for each state. Regional Technical Assistance Groups (RTAGs) supported by USEPA regional offices are facilitating the development of “regional” nutrient criteria. These RTAGs provide the scientific expertise to assess regional data and eutrophic conditions, which can be useful to the states in adopting and developing individual state criteria. While few states have numeric criteria for either total nitrogen (TN) or total phosphorus (TP), the state of Ohio has recommended a summer limit of 1000 µg/L (1 mg/L) of TP for the lower Cuyahoga River as part of the final recommendations for the Lower Cuyahoga River TMDL (Ohio EPA 2003). No suggested concentration limits for TN for rivers and streams in Ohio were found in the literature. Because there are few numeric criteria in use in regulatory organizations that might oversee Heartland facilities, benchmark values for TN and TP, which are currently under consideration by the USEPA Region 7 RTAG, were used for evaluation purposes. These TN and TP benchmark values are the means of TN and TP values taken from the literature or derived statistically as ranges of values both considered protective and associated with reference or “high quality” streams. A summary of values and sources are listed in Table 8, representing current efforts within the USEPA Region 7 RTAG.

Page 37: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

29

Table 8. Potential benchmark values for nutrient stressors and other associated variables derived using multiple approaches.

Parameter Literature1

(range)

Nutrient Regions2

(range)

Reference Streams (median)

Tri-section3

(median)

25th percentile

MEANS (all

methods)Total

nitrogen (mg/L)

0.7 – 1.5 0.54 – 2.18 1.08 0.81 0.82 1.03

Total phosphorus

(mg/L) 0.025 – 0.075 0.01 – 0.128 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.068

Sestonic chlorophyll

a (µg/L) 10 – 30 0.9 – 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.0 6.0

Benthic chlorophyll a (mg/m2)

20 - 70 NA 24.2 20.3 11.9 25.4

Turbidity (NTU) NA 1.7 – 17.5 12.0 10.5 9.5 10.4

1 (Dodds et al. 1998) These values are for streams in the mesotrophic range. 2 (USEPA 2000d, a, b, c, 2001a, b, c). 3 Tri-section values are for upper one-third streams in USEPA Region 7 having highest

total richness for macroinvertebrates. For all hydrologic seasons, median levels for total nitrogen for tributaries were above a suggested benchmark value of 1.03 mg/L (Figure 50). TN levels were highest in hydroperiod 1 and similar, but lower in hydroperiods 2 and 3. The median TN values were between 3 and 6 mg/L for all waterbody types in all hydroperiods. Yearly trends in TN suggested that a steady decrease in concentrations within tributaries might be occurring, but no trends or patterns were observed in point source or main stem categories (Figure 51). The median values for total phosphorus were well above the regional benchmark value of 68 µg/L (0.068 mg/L), but below the Ohio standard and TMDL-recommended limit of 1000 µg/L (1 mg/L) (Figure 52). Both main stem and point source levels of TP were highest in hydroperiod 1 and lowest in hydroperiod 2, while tributary levels were highest in the winter (hydroperiod 2, the ascending flow period). Also, the highest median values for TP were associated with the Cuyahoga River and point sources, except during the hydroperiod 2, when the tributary median value reached almost 0.5 mg/L. Error bar plots of TP data for each waterbody type (Figure 53) clearly suggest that TP concentrations have been in decline since the early 1980s in the main stem of the lower Cuyahoga River and its tributaries, however no significance test was performed. Suitable data were too few to evaluate trends for point sources.

Page 38: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

30

It is clear from these data that both TP and TN are present in all waterbodies at levels in excess of concentrations suspected as limiting for plant growth in lotic ecosystems, and that these excess levels may constitute significant water quality issues. Ohio EPA has also indicated that excessive nutrients are a primary cause of impairment in the lower Cuyahoga River basin (Ohio EPA 2003, 2006). Median levels of total arsenic (a metalloid) were well above the USEPA human health water-organism criterion value of 0.018 µg/L in all waterbody types in all hydroperiods, but were also below the Ohio agricultural use criterion (100 µg/L) for this element (Figure 54). Total arsenic levels were noticeably higher in tributaries during hydroperiod 2, but levels of arsenic were otherwise similar among waterbody types. Total arsenic concentrations appear to have dropped in tributaries beginning in the 1980s (Figure 55). Limited yearly data for the main stem and point sources prevented development of meaningful trends, except for hydroperiod 1. Further trend interpretation is therefore extremely speculative.

Assessment of Metals with Hardness-Independent Toxicity Of the metals whose aquatic life toxicity is unaffected by hardness, few had literature values for chronic aquatic life criteria. Total aluminum values appeared to be high throughout CUVA (Figure 56). Violin plots for the lower Cuyahoga River, its point sources, and its tributaries showed median values above the national freshwater criterion chronic concentration (87 µg/L) for the protection of aquatic life. However, it is noted that this standard was proposed based primarily on information from a single study on striped bass in waters having a pH of 6.5 to 6.6 and a total hardness of less than 10 mg/L. Aluminum is considered a non-priority pollutant by USEPA (USEPA 2004b). Nevertheless, total aluminum levels are high in all waterbodies and at all times of the year, and are typically highest in both hydrologic season 2 and in the tributaries as a group. Data for temporal distributions of total aluminum values by year was incomplete for tributaries and point sources, and main stem data did not show any discernible trends in yearly aluminum levels (Figure 57). Data for total manganese was limited to the main stem and tributaries, with yearly measures available for the main stem dating back to the 1960s (Figure 58, Figure 59). The single criterion for manganese (50 µg/L) is a national criterion for the protection of human health (USEPA 2004b). Median values for manganese for all waterbody types during all hydrologic seasons were about twice this human health criterion level. Generally, total manganese levels were similar between main stem and tributary groups and were only slightly elevated during the winter months (hydroperiod 2), when compared to other hydroperiod values. No clear trends were observed in manganese levels either in the Cuyahoga or its tributaries (Figure 59). Total mercury data were sufficient to produce violin plots for all hydrologic seasons fro both the main stem and the tributaries of the Cuyahoga River (Figure 60). USEPA’s aquatic life freshwater criterion chronic concentration and Ohio’s aquatic life outside mixing zone average criterion for total mercury are both 0.91 µg/L, and nearly all plottable data were below this value. Median values for total mercury were typically

Page 39: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

31

about 0.5 µg/L for all hydrologic seasons and all waterbody groups. Based on the error bar plot, it appears main stem total mercury concentrations have been reduced since the 1970s (Figure 61). Similarly, tributary values may have also been reduced since the 1980s. However, differing analytical methods and corresponding detection limits may influence these plots.

Assessment of Metals with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity Seven metals having hardness-dependant toxicities (cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and zinc) were observed at both main stem and tributary stations. Total cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel and zinc were also measured in point sources. Violin plots were constructed for each of these metals and any appropriate criterion value(s) included. Criteria for the protection of aquatic life were typically relevant. Since toxicity of these metals is dependent upon hardness, criterion values are adjusted using standard equations (Ohio EPA 2002, 2003; USEPA 2004b) to account for ambient total hardness values (as CaCO3). In general, these metals are more toxic in waters with lower hardness values. Since concurrent hardness observations were not made with observations of many metals, a representative hardness value for each waterbody type was developed for analytical purposes. This representative value, based on the mean of available total hardness (as CaCO3) observations within the park study area, was chosen as 200 mg/L (as CaCO3) for all three waterbody types (i.e. main stem, tributaries, and point sources). Though each stream tends to have its own characteristic hardness based on geology, runoff, etc., this value was considered generally applicable to all waters within the park study area. Therefore, all criterion values for metals with hardness-dependent toxicity used in this report were calculated for this representative value. Total cadmium values were plotted against both the Ohio and federal criteria for protection of aquatic life (Figure 62). These criteria differ in value by about one order of magnitude, with the federal criterion chronic concentration being more restrictive. Median total cadmium concentrations for all waterbody groups were lower than the more restrictive USEPA criterion during hydroperiod 1, while tributary median values during hydroperiods 2 and 3 fell between the state and federal criteria. In general, it appears that total cadmium concentrations are seldom a problem within the main stem, but may be problematic in the tributaries. The apparent decrease of cadmium levels over time may be an artifact of reporting limits and improved detection limits, as the data appears to be somewhat monotonic in nature (Figure 63). Medians of reported values for total chromium for both the main stem and tributary stations were both well below the state and federal hardness-based criteria (Figure 64). The majority of chromium values at tributary stations appeared to meet the criteria for total chromium during all hydrologic seasons. Median concentration for this metal varied between 20 and 30 µg/L for all waterbody groups, depending on hydroperiod. In general, chromium does not appear to be a problem in these systems. The error bar plot for the main stem stations appears to be affected by a detection or reporting limit, as nearly all values recorded after 1982 are 30 µg/L (Figure 65). Yearly data for the tributaries show a decrease in chromium levels, and the plot did not suggest a detection or reporting limit restriction.

Page 40: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

32

Median values for total lead in the Cuyahoga River and tributaries were below one or both of the calculated total lead criteria (Figure 66). Median values for point sources and tributary stations were highest during hydroperiods 2 and 3. The median and quartile ranges for waterbodies within hydrogroups were often similar, with tributaries having slightly higher to distinctly higher values. As with other metals data, lead values recorded in the 1970s appear to be higher with more in-year variance than current levels, which could again be related to the use of high detection limits associated with earlier analytical methodologies (Figure 67). The error plot for the point source group suggests that there were great reductions in the concentration of total lead in these waterbodies. However, plottable data were limited to hydroperiod 1 of only eight years. Violin plots of total nickel suggest that concentrations of nickel occurring in the Cuyahoga River and its tributaries seldom exceeded Ohio’s relevant aquatic life chronic criterion (Figure 68). Nickel measurements for point sources were limited, with collections only during hydroperiod 1. All of these measured values were below the criteria level. Median values for waterbody groups were very similar within and between individual hydroperiods, and median concentrations never exceeded 40 µg/L. Nickel levels appeared to drop in concentration from 1980 through 1982 in the main stem of the lower Cuyahoga, but this may be an artifact of changing analytical methods and detection limits, as suggested by the monotonic nature of most data values before and after the early 1980s (Figure 69). Tributary values peaked during the same time period that main stem levels were dropping, which seems counter intuitive. It may be that a number of different methods were used for main stem and tributary station analyses, and the joining of disparate data sets has created artificial patterns in the trend data. No selenium values were available for point sources plots, but violin plots of total selenium data for the main stem and tributary groups indicated that most values fell below the USEPA chronic criterion value (Figure 70). Several total selenium values measured in the 1970s and 1980s were above the criterion of 5 µg/L, but more current levels are nearer to 2 µg/L (Figure 70, Figure 71). Sufficient data were available for long-term plotting of only main stem conditions, and no clear trend was apparent, other than consistently low levels of selenium from 1983 to 2002. The calculated hardness-based criterion for total silver, again based on a representative value of 200-mg/L for total hardness, was 12.5 µg/L. Violin plots were produced for both the main stem and tributary groups in hydroperiod 1 but only main stem distributions could be plotted for hydroperiods 2 and 3 (Figure 72). Median and quartile values for all waterbodies in all hydroperiods occurred below the criterion level of 12.5 µg/L. Examination of the error bar plots suggested that little data were available for analyses of the occurrence and distribution of this metal between years, waterbody groups and hydroperiods (Figure 73). Violin plots for total zinc were typically below the more restrictive total zinc criterion, and only a few values exceeded both criterion levels (Figure 74). Most exceedances were for total zinc in tributaries especially during hydroperiods 2 and 3. In general, median values for waterbody groups were most similar during hydroperiods 1 and 3, varying between about 20 and 40 µg/L. Median levels in hydroperiod 3 were highest with a point

Page 41: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

33

source median value >100 µg/L and main stem and tributary values of 30 and 70 µg/L, respectively. Total zinc measurements for all waterbody groups appeared to decrease from relatively high values in the 1970s, with an additional drop in levels in the late 1980s (Figure 75). These declines might be real, or they might represent changing methods and better detection limits over time.

Page 42: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

34

Core Elements Figures Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 43: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

35

Figure 4. B

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

P

oint

Sou

rces

M

ain

Stem

)

0

50

100

150

200

250

CU

VA

0052

CU

VA

0053

CU

VA

0063

CU

VA

0088

CU

VA

0090

CU

VA

0120

CU

VA

0202

CU

VA

0203

CU

VA

0226

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

ox plots of total alkalinity for main stem and point sources by station.

0

50

100

150

200

250

CU

VA

0221

CU

VA

0224

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3

Page 44: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

36

Figure 5. Box plots of total alkalinity for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

0

100

200

300

400

500

CU

VA

0164

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0192

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

NO DATA

0

100

200

300

400

500

CU

VA

0151

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

Page 45: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

37

Figure 6. Box plots of total alkalinity for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station.

0

100

200

300

400

500

CU

VA

0138

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

0

100

200

300

400

500

CU

VA

0085

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

NO DATA

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Yel

low

Cre

ek

B

rand

ywin

e C

reek

Page 46: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

38

Figure 7. Box plots of total alkalinity for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station.

0

100

200

300

CU

VA

0018

CU

VA

0020

CU

VA

0045

CU

VA

0051To

tal A

lkal

inity

(mg/

L as

CaC

O3)

0

100

200

300C

UV

A0198

CU

VA

0212

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

0

100

200

300

400

500

CU

VA

0010

CU

VA

0087

CU

VA

0095

CU

VA

0103

CU

VA

0105

CU

VA

0107

CU

VA

0109

CU

VA

0112

CU

VA

0113

CU

VA

0114

CU

VA

0118

CU

VA

0125

CU

VA

0130

CU

VA

0130a

CU

VA

0132

CU

VA

0147

CU

VA

0153

CU

VA

0159

CU

VA

0163

CU

VA

0214

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

Page 47: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

39

Figure 8. Violin plots of total alkalinity for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

0

100

200

300

400

500

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

0

100

200

300

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 48: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

40

Figure 9. Tseason. Hydrologic

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

50

100

150

200

250

300

1967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032005

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

50

100

150

200

250

1922196519671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

emporal distribution of total alkalinity for different waterbody types by hydrologic

seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols respectively.

110

115

120

125

130

135

1990

Tota

l Alk

alin

ity (m

g/L

as C

aCO

3)

Page 49: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

41

Figure 10. Box plots of pH for main stem and point sources by station. The dashed lines represent the state of Ohio criterion range of pH (6.5-9.0) for aquatic life.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

P

oint

Sou

rces

M

ain

Stem

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0052C

UV

A0053

CU

VA

0057C

UV

A0061

CU

VA

0062C

UV

A0063

CU

VA

0069C

UV

A0071

CU

VA

0083C

UV

A0086

CU

VA

0088C

UV

A0090

CU

VA

0115C

UV

A0120

CU

VA

0121C

UV

A0122

CU

VA

0128C

UV

A0141

CU

VA

0146C

UV

A0149

CU

VA

0161C

UV

A0162

CU

VA

0187C

UV

A0202

CU

VA

0203C

UV

A0226

CU

VA

0249

pH

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0089

CU

VA

0099

CU

VA

0190

CU

VA

0215

CU

VA

0224

CU

VA

0228pH

Page 50: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

42

Figure 11. Box plots of pH for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station. The dashed lines represent the state of Ohio criterion range of pH (6.5 – 9.0) for aquatic life.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0135

CU

VA

0164

CU

VA

0166

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0172

CU

VA

0179

CU

VA

0182

CU

VA

0189

CU

VA

0192

CU

VA

0193

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0181

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0151

CU

VA

0152

CU

VA

0154

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

Page 51: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

43

Figure 12. Box plots of pH for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station. The dashed lines represent the state of Ohio criterion range of pH (6.5 – 9.0) for aquatic life.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0126

CU

VA

0127

CU

VA

0134

CU

VA

0137

CU

VA

0138

CU

VA

0145

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0085

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0096

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Yel

low

Cre

ek

B

rand

ywin

e C

reek

Page 52: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

44

Figure 13. Box plots of pH for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station. The dashed lines represent the state of Ohio criterion range of pH (6.5 – 9.0) for aquatic life.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0007

CU

VA

0009

CU

VA

0013

CU

VA

0014

CU

VA

0018

CU

VA

0020

CU

VA

0021

CU

VA

0040

CU

VA

0043

CU

VA

0044

CU

VA

0045

CU

VA

0050

CU

VA

0051

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0002

CU

VA

0004

CU

VA

0008

CU

VA

0011

CU

VA

0012

CU

VA

0022

CU

VA

0037

CU

VA

0042

CU

VA

0198

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CU

VA

0003C

UV

A0006

CU

VA

0010C

UV

A0023

CU

VA

0087C

UV

A0095

CU

VA

0097C

UV

A0098

CU

VA

0102C

UV

A0103

CU

VA

0104C

UV

A0105

CU

VA

0107C

UV

A0109

CU

VA

0110C

UV

A0111

CU

VA

0112C

UV

A0113

CU

VA

0114C

UV

A0117

CU

VA

0118C

UV

A0125

CU

VA

0130C

UV

A0130a

CU

VA

0132C

UV

A0147

CU

VA

0153C

UV

A0158

CU

VA

0159C

UV

A0160

CU

VA

0163C

UV

A0214

pH (s

tand

ard

units

)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

Page 53: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

45

Figure 14. The dashed

4

6

8

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

pH

4

6

8

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

pH

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin plots of pH for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. lines represent the state of Ohio criterion range of pH (6.5-9.0) for aquatic life.

2

4

6

8

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

pH

Page 54: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

46

Figure 15. THydrologic

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

pH

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

192219641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

pH

emporal distribution of pH for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

1969

1970

1973

1974

1975

1984

1987

1991pH

Page 55: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

47

Figure 16. Box plots of specific conductance for main stem and point sources by station.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Po

int S

ourc

es

M

ain

Stem

0

500

1000

1500

2000

CU

VA

0052C

UV

A0053

CU

VA

0057C

UV

A0061

CU

VA

0062C

UV

A0063

CU

VA

0069C

UV

A0071

CU

VA

0083C

UV

A0086

CU

VA

0088C

UV

A0090

CU

VA

0115C

UV

A0120

CU

VA

0121C

UV

A0122

CU

VA

0128C

UV

A0141

CU

VA

0146C

UV

A0149

CU

VA

0161C

UV

A0162

CU

VA

0187C

UV

A0202

CU

VA

0203C

UV

A0226

CU

VA

0249

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

CU

VA

0089

CU

VA

0099

CU

VA

0215

CU

VA

0224S

peci

fic C

ondu

ctan

ce (u

mho

s/cm

)

Page 56: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

48

Figure 17. Box plots of specific conductance for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0135

CU

VA

0164

CU

VA

0166

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0172

CU

VA

0173

CU

VA

0179

CU

VA

0182

CU

VA

0189

CU

VA

0192

CU

VA

0193

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0181

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

1000

2000

3000

CU

VA

0151

CU

VA

0152

CU

VA

0154

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

Page 57: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

49

Figure 18. Box plots of specific conductance for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station.

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0127

CU

VA

0134

CU

VA

0137

CU

VA

0138

CU

VA

0140S

peci

fic C

ondu

ctan

ce (u

mho

s/cm

)

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0085

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

500

1000

CU

VA

0067

CU

VA

0096

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Yel

low

Cre

ek

B

rand

ywin

e C

reek

Page 58: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

50

Figure 19. Box plots of specific conductance for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station.

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0007

CU

VA

0009

CU

VA

0013

CU

VA

0014

CU

VA

0015

CU

VA

0017

CU

VA

0018

CU

VA

0019

CU

VA

0020

CU

VA

0021

CU

VA

0039

CU

VA

0040

CU

VA

0043

CU

VA

0044

CU

VA

0045

CU

VA

0046

CU

VA

0051

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

1000

2000

CU

VA

0002

CU

VA

0004

CU

VA

0008

CU

VA

0011

CU

VA

0012

CU

VA

0022

CU

VA

0035

CU

VA

0037

CU

VA

0042

CU

VA

0198

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

1000

2000

3000

CU

VA

0003C

UV

A0006

CU

VA

0010C

UV

A0016

CU

VA

0023C

UV

A0065

CU

VA

0087C

UV

A0095

CU

VA

0097C

UV

A0098

CU

VA

0102C

UV

A0103

CU

VA

0104C

UV

A0105

CU

VA

0107C

UV

A0109

CU

VA

0110C

UV

A0111

CU

VA

0112C

UV

A0113

CU

VA

0114C

UV

A0117

CU

VA

0118C

UV

A0119

CU

VA

0123C

UV

A0124

CU

VA

0125C

UV

A0130

CU

VA

0130aC

UV

A0131

CU

VA

0132C

UV

A0147

CU

VA

0153C

UV

A0158

CU

VA

0159C

UV

A0160

CU

VA

0163C

UV

A0214

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

Page 59: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

51

Figure 20.

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin Plots of specific conductance for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

Page 60: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

52

Figure 21. hydrologic Hydrologic

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

19641965196619681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

19221965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

(um

hos/

cm)

Temporal distribution of specific conductance for different waterbody types by season. seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

0

250

500

750

1000

1974

1975

1984

1987

1991S

peci

fic C

ondu

ctan

ce (u

mho

s/cm

)

Page 61: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

53

Figure 22. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for main stem and point sources by station. State of Ohio dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/L shown for reference.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Mai

n St

em

0

4

8

12

16

CU

VA

0052C

UV

A0053

CU

VA

0057C

UV

A0061

CU

VA

0062C

UV

A0063

CU

VA

0069C

UV

A0071

CU

VA

0083C

UV

A0086

CU

VA

0088C

UV

A0090

CU

VA

0115C

UV

A0120

CU

VA

0121C

UV

A0122

CU

VA

0128C

UV

A0141

CU

VA

0146C

UV

A0149

CU

VA

0161C

UV

A0162

CU

VA

0187C

UV

A0202

CU

VA

0203C

UV

A0226

CU

VA

0249

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

4

8

12

16

CU

VA

0089

CU

VA

0099

CU

VA

0190

CU

VA

0215

CU

VA

0224D

isso

lved

Oxy

gen

(mg/

L)

Page 62: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

54

Figure 23. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station. State of Ohio dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/L shown for reference.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0135

CU

VA

0164

CU

VA

0166

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0172

CU

VA

0179

CU

VA

0182

CU

VA

0189

CU

VA

0192

CU

VA

0193

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0181

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0151

CU

VA

0152

CU

VA

0154

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

Page 63: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

55

Figure 24. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station. State of Ohio dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/L shown for reference.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Y

ello

w C

reek

Bra

ndyw

ine

Cre

ek

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0126

CU

VA

0127

CU

VA

0133

CU

VA

0134

CU

VA

0137

CU

VA

0138

CU

VA

0144

CU

VA

0145

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0085

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0096

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

Page 64: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

56

Figure 25. Box plots of dissolved oxygen for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station. State of Ohio dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/L shown for reference.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0007

CU

VA

0013

CU

VA

0014

CU

VA

0015

CU

VA

0017

CU

VA

0019

CU

VA

0020

CU

VA

0021

CU

VA

0039

CU

VA

0040

CU

VA

0043

CU

VA

0044

CU

VA

0045

CU

VA

0046

CU

VA

0050

CU

VA

0051

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0002

CU

VA

0004

CU

VA

0008

CU

VA

0011

CU

VA

0012

CU

VA

0022

CU

VA

0035

CU

VA

0037

CU

VA

0042

CU

VA

0198

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

CU

VA

0003C

UV

A0005

CU

VA

0006C

UV

A0016

CU

VA

0023C

UV

A0087

CU

VA

0095C

UV

A0097

CU

VA

0098C

UV

A0102

CU

VA

0103C

UV

A0104

CU

VA

0105C

UV

A0107

CU

VA

0109C

UV

A0110

CU

VA

0111C

UV

A0112

CU

VA

0113C

UV

A0114

CU

VA

0117C

UV

A0118

CU

VA

0119C

UV

A0123

CU

VA

0124C

UV

A0125

CU

VA

0130C

UV

A0130a

CU

VA

0131C

UV

A0132

CU

VA

0147C

UV

A0153

CU

VA

0158C

UV

A0159

CU

VA

0160C

UV

A0163

CU

VA

0214

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

Page 65: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

57

Figure 26. State of Ohi

0

4

8

12

16

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

0

4

8

12

16

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin plots of dissolved oxygen for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. o dissolved oxygen standard of 5.0 mg/L shown for reference.

0

4

8

12

16

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

Page 66: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

58

Figure 27. season. Hydrologic

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

2

6

10

14

18

196419651967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022005

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

2

6

10

14

18

19221964196719681969197019711973197419751976197719781979198019811982198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032005

Dis

solv

ed O

xyge

n (m

g/L)

Temporal distribution of dissolved oxygen for different waterbody Types by hydrologic

seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols respectively.

2

6

10

14

18

1973

1974

1975

1984

1987

1991D

isso

lved

Oxy

gen

(mg/

L)

Page 67: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

59

Figure 28. Box plots of water temperature for main stem and point sources by station.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Mai

n St

em

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

CU

VA

0052C

UV

A0053

CU

VA

0057C

UV

A0061

CU

VA

0062C

UV

A0063

CU

VA

0069C

UV

A0071

CU

VA

0083C

UV

A0086

CU

VA

0088C

UV

A0090

CU

VA

0115C

UV

A0120

CU

VA

0121C

UV

A0122

CU

VA

0128C

UV

A0129

CU

VA

0141C

UV

A0146

CU

VA

0149C

UV

A0161

CU

VA

0162C

UV

A0187

CU

VA

0202C

UV

A0203

CU

VA

0226C

UV

A0227

CU

VA

0249

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

CU

VA

0089

CU

VA

0099

CU

VA

0190

CU

VA

0215

CU

VA

0224

CU

VA

0228

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

Page 68: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

60

Figure 29. Box plots of water temperature for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0135

CU

VA

0164

CU

VA

0166

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0172

CU

VA

0173

CU

VA

0179

CU

VA

0182

CU

VA

0189

CU

VA

0192

CU

VA

0193

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0181

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0151

CU

VA

0152

CU

VA

0154

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

Page 69: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

61

Figure 30. Box plots of water temperature for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0126

CU

VA

0127

CU

VA

0133

CU

VA

0134

CU

VA

0137

CU

VA

0138

CU

VA

0140

CU

VA

0144

CU

VA

0145

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0085

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0067

CU

VA

0096

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Yel

low

Cre

ek

B

rand

ywin

e C

reek

Page 70: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

62

Figure 31. Box plots of water temperature for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0007

CU

VA

0013

CU

VA

0014

CU

VA

0015

CU

VA

0017

CU

VA

0018

CU

VA

0019

CU

VA

0020

CU

VA

0021

CU

VA

0039

CU

VA

0040

CU

VA

0043

CU

VA

0044

CU

VA

0045

CU

VA

0046

CU

VA

0050

CU

VA

0051

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0002

CU

VA

0004

CU

VA

0008

CU

VA

0011

CU

VA

0012

CU

VA

0022

CU

VA

0035

CU

VA

0037

CU

VA

0042

CU

VA

0198

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CU

VA

0003C

UV

A0005

CU

VA

0006C

UV

A0010

CU

VA

0016C

UV

A0023

CU

VA

0065C

UV

A0087

CU

VA

0095C

UV

A0097

CU

VA

0098C

UV

A0102

CU

VA

0103C

UV

A0104

CU

VA

0105C

UV

A0107

CU

VA

0109C

UV

A0110

CU

VA

0111C

UV

A0112

CU

VA

0113C

UV

A0114

CU

VA

0117C

UV

A0118

CU

VA

0119C

UV

A0123

CU

VA

0124C

UV

A0125

CU

VA

0130C

UV

A0130a

CU

VA

0131C

UV

A0132

CU

VA

0147C

UV

A0153

CU

VA

0158C

UV

A0159

CU

VA

0160C

UV

A0163

CU

VA

0195C

UV

A0214

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (d

egre

es C

elsi

us)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

Page 71: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

63

Figure 32.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin plots of water temperature for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

Page 72: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

64

Figure 33. Temporal distribution of water temperature for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1,2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

19651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

192219641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

Wat

er T

empe

ratu

re (c

entig

rade

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1969

1970

1973

1974

1975

1984

1987

1991W

ater

Tem

pera

ture

(cen

tigra

de)

Page 73: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

65

Figure 34. Box plots of mean daily flow for main stem and point sources by station.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Mai

n St

em

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

CU

VA

0063

CU

VA

0202

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

NO DATA

Page 74: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

66

Figure 35. Box plots of mean daily flow for Tinkers Creek, Deer Lick Run, and Chippewa Creek by station.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

C

hipp

ewa

Cre

ek

D

eer L

ick

Run

Tink

ers C

reek

0

200

400

600

800

1000

CU

VA

0167

CU

VA

0192

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

NO DATA

NO DATA

Page 75: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

67

Figure 36. Box plots of mean daily flow for Brandywine Creek, Yellow Creek, and Mud Brook by station.

NO DATA

NO DATA

NO DATA

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

ud B

rook

Yel

low

Cre

ek

B

rand

ywin

e C

reek

Page 76: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

68

Figure 37. Box plots of mean daily flow for Little Cuyahoga River, Ohio Canal, and miscellaneous tributaries by station.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

CU

VA

0018

CU

VA

0020

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

0

20

40

60

80

100

CU

VA

0198

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

CU

VA

0010

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

M

isce

llane

ous T

ribut

arie

s

Ohi

o C

anal

Littl

e C

uyah

oga

Riv

er

Page 77: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

69

Figure 38.

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin plots of mean daily flow for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

Page 78: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

70

Figure 39. Temporal distribution of mean daily flow for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

2800

5600

8400

11200

14000

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1989

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

0

100

200

300

400

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

Mea

n D

aily

Flo

w (c

fs)

NO DATA

Page 79: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

71

Priority Concerns Figures Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 80: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

72

Water Clarity and Pathogens Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 81: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

73

Figure 40. Violin plots of turbidity for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents a regional benchmark (10.4 NTU) taken from Table 8.

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Tributaries

Turb

idity

(NTU

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

Main Stem Tributaries

Turb

idity

(NTU

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Tributaries

Turb

idity

(NTU

)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 82: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

74

Figure 41. Temporal distribution of turbidity for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

100

200

300

400

500

1978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

YEAR

Turb

idity

(NTU

)

0

1000

2000

3000

192219791984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

YEAR

Turb

idity

(NTU

)

NO DATA

Page 83: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

75

Figure 42. Violin plots of Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper and lower lines (298/100mL and 126/100mL, respectively) represent state of Ohio maximum criteria for primary contact. Observations are not to exceed the upper value in more than 10% of samples.

100

101

102

103

104

105

Main Stem Tributaries

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

(cou

nt p

er 1

00 m

L)

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Tributaries

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

(cou

nt p

er 1

00 m

L)

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Tributaries

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

(cou

nt p

er 1

00 m

L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 84: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

76

Figure 43. Temporal distribution of Escheria coli counts for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

10000

20000

30000

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

YEAR

E.C

oli-M

TEC

(N

o/10

0mL)

0

5000

10000

15000

1922

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

YEAR

E.C

oli-M

TEC

(N

o/10

0mL)

NO DATA

Page 85: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

77

Figure 44. Violin plots of in situ Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper and lower lines (298/100mL and 126/100mL, respectively) represent state of Ohio maximum criteria for primary contact. Observations are not to exceed the upper value in more than 10% of samples.

100

101

102

103

104

105

Main Stem

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

in s

itu (c

ount

per

100

mL)

NO DATA

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

Main Stem Tributaries

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

in s

itu (c

ount

per

100

mL)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 86: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

78

Figure 45. Temporal distribution of in situ Escheria coli counts for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

1991

1992

1993

2000

YEAR

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

in s

itu (c

ount

per

100

mL)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

1991

1992

1993

YEAR

E. c

oli M

TEC

, MF

in s

itu (c

ount

per

100

mL)

NO DATA

Page 87: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

79

Figure 46. The upper acontact. Ob

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Violin plots of fecal coliform counts for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. nd lower lines (298 and 126, respectively) represent state of Ohio maximum criteria for primary servations are not to exceed the upper line in more than 10% of samples.

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

Page 88: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

80

Figure 47. Temporal distribution of fecal coliforms for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

197319741975197619771979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022005

YEAR

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

1000000

19221973197419751976197719781979198019811984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

0

10000

20000

30000

1974

1975

1984

YEAR

Feca

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

Page 89: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

81

Figure 48. Violin plots of total coliforms for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents the state of Ohio maximum criterion value (5000/100mL) for primary contact.

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Point Sources

Tota

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Point Sources

Tota

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Main Stem Point Sources

Tota

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 90: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

82

Figure 49. Temporal distribution of total coliforms for different waterbody types by hydrologic season.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

50000

100000

150000

1973

1974

YEAR

Tota

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

NO DATA

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

1974

YEAR

Tota

l Col

iform

s M

F (c

ount

per

100

mL)

Page 91: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

83

Nutrient Loading and Non-Metals Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 92: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

84

Figure 50. Violin plots of total nitrogen for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

0

5

10

15

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(mg/

L)

0

5

10

15

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(mg/

L)

0

5

10

15

20

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(mg/

L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 93: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

85

Figure 51. Temporal distribution of total nitrogen for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

5

10

19731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(mg/

L)

0

5

10

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1988

1989

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(mg/

L)

0

5

10

1975

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(ug/

L)

Page 94: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

86

Figure 52. Violin plots of total phosphorus for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.001

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

.001

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

.001

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

Page 95: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

87

Figure 53. Temporal distribution of total phosphorus for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

1

197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

YEAR

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

0

1

2

3

1972197319741975197619771978197919801981198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619981999200020012002200320042005

YEAR

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

0

1

2

3

1974

1975

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

(ug/

L)

Page 96: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

88

Figure 54. Violin plots of total arsenic for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper line represents the state of Ohio agricultural use outside mixing zone average criterion (100 µg/L) and the lower line represents the USEPA human health water-organism criterion (0.018 µg/L). Ohio has no state outside mixing zone average criteria for arsenic for human health in nondrinking waters. The Ohio criterion for drinking waters is 50 µg/L (not shown).

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Ars

enic

(ug/

L)

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Ars

enic

(ug/

L)

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Ars

enic

(ug/

L)

Page 97: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

89

Figure 55. Temporal distribution of total arsenic for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

5

10

15

1974197519761977197819791980198119821984198519861987198819891990199119921993199619981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Alrs

enic

(ug/

L)

0

10

20

30

40

1975

1976

1977

1984

1985

1986

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Alrs

enic

(ug/

L)

0

1

2

3

4

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Ars

enic

(ug/

L)

Page 98: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

90

Metals with Hardness-Independent Toxicity Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 99: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

91

Figure 56. Violin plots of total aluminum for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents both the USEPA aquatic life criterion chronic concentration and the state of Ohio outside mixing zone average criterion for all waterbodies (87 µg/L).

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

Page 100: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

92

Figure 57. Temporal distribution of total aluminum for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

1973

1974

1975

1979

1980

1981

1984

1987

1988

1989

1991

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

YEAR

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

1974

1975

1984

1985

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

1974

1975

1984

1987

YEAR

Tota

l Alu

min

um (u

g/L)

Page 101: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

93

Figure 58. The dashed

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

10

100

1000

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Man

gane

se (u

g/L)

Violin plots of total manganese for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. line represents the USEPA human health criterion (50 µg/L) for all waterbodies.

10

100

1000

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Man

gane

se (u

g/L)

10

100

1000

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Man

gane

se (u

g/L)

Page 102: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

94

Figure 59. Temporal distribution of total manganese for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

200

400

600

800

1964197319741975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Man

gane

se (u

g/L)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Man

gane

se (u

g/L)

NO DATA

Page 103: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

95

Figure 60. VThe dashed linOhio aquatic l

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Mer

cury

(ug/

L)

iolin plots of total mercury for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. e represents both the USEPA aquatic life criterion chronic concentration and the state of ife outside mixing zone average criterion (0.91 µg/L).

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Mer

cury

(ug/

L)

.01

.1

1

10

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Mer

cury

(ug/

L)

Page 104: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

96

Figure 61. Temporal distribution of total mercury for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

1

2

3

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1984

1991

1996

1997

YEAR

Tota

l Mer

cury

(ug/

L)

0

1

2

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Mer

cury

(ug/

L)

NO DATA

Page 105: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

97

Metals with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity Please see the “Statistical Analysis and Methodology” and relevant “Water Quality Concerns Analysis” sections of this report for aid in interpreting these figures.

Page 106: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

98

Figure 62. Violin plots of total cadmium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper line represents the state of Ohio outside mixing zone average criterion for aquatic life impairment (4.2 µg/L), while the lower line represents the USEPA criterion chronic concentration (0.45 µg/L) based on a representative total hardness value of 200 mg/L as CaCO3.

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

.01

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 107: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

99

Figure 63. Temporal distribution of total cadmium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

5

10

15

1974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

0

5

10

15

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

YEAR

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

0

5

10

15

1969

1970

1976

1984

1987

1989

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Cad

miu

m (u

g/L)

Page 108: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

100

Figure 64. Violin plots of total chromium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents the state of Ohio aquatic life criteria.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

Page 109: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

101

Figure 65. Temporal distribution of total chromium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

10

20

30

40

50

19731974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

0

25

50

75

100

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

YEAR

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

0

15

30

45

1969

1970

1976

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Chr

omiu

m (u

g/L)

Page 110: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

102

Figure 66. Violin plots of total lead for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper line represents the state of Ohio outside mixing zone average criterion for aquatic life impairment (16 µg/L), while the lower line represents the USEPA criterion chronic concentration (7.7 µg/L) based on a representative total hardness value of 200 mg/L as CaCO3.

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 111: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

103

Figure 67. Temporal distribution of total lead for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

0

50

100

150

200

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

YEAR

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

0

50

100

150

200

1969

1970

1975

1976

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Lea

d (u

g/L)

Page 112: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

104

Figure 68. Violin plots of total nickel for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents the state of Ohio aquatic life criteria (chronic value).

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

.1

1

10

100

1000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

Page 113: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

105

Figure 69. Temporal distribution of total nickel for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

50

100

150

1975

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

YEAR

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

YEAR

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1969

1970

1984

1987

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Nic

kel (

ug/L

)

Page 114: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

106

Figure 70. Violin plots of total selenium for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents the USEPA aquatic life criteria (chronic value) for all waterbodies.

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Sel

eniu

m (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Sel

eniu

m (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Sel

eniu

m (u

g/L)

Page 115: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

107

Figure 71. Temporal distribution of total selenium for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

2

4

6

8

10

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

YEAR

Tota

l Sel

eniu

m (u

g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

1973

1975

1976

1977

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Sel

eniu

m (u

g/L)

NO DATA

Page 116: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

108

Figure 72. Violin plots of total silver for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The dashed line represents the USEPA criterion chronic concentration for aquatic life (12.5 µg/L).

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem

Tota

l Silv

er (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem

Tota

l Silv

er (u

g/L)

.1

1

10

100

Main Stem Tributaries

Tota

l Silv

er (u

g/L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 117: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

109

Figure 73. Temporal distribution of total silver for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. Hydrologic seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1975

1976

1978

1980

1981

1982

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Silv

er (u

g/L)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1975

1976

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Silv

er (u

g/L)

NO DATA

Page 118: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

110

Figure 74. Violin plots of total zinc for different hydrologic seasons by waterbody type. The upper line represents the state of Ohio outside mixing zone average criterion for aquatic life impairment (220 µg/L), while the lower line represents the USEPA criterion chronic concentration (184 µg/L) based on a representative total hardness value of 200 mg/L as CaCO3.

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

1

10

100

1000

10000

Main Stem Point Sources Tributaries

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

HY

DR

OLO

GIC

SEA

SON

1

(Low

/Nor

mal

Flo

w)

2 (A

scen

ding

Flo

w)

3

(Des

cend

ing

Flow

)

Page 119: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

111

Figure 75. Hydrologic

WA

TER

BO

DY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

Poin

t Sou

rces

Tr

ibut

arie

s

M

ain

Stem

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1974197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319951996199719981999200020012002

YEAR

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

0

200

400

600

800

1922

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

YEAR

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

Temporal distribution of total zinc for different waterbody types by hydrologic season. seasons 1, 2 and 3 are represented by circle, triangle and square symbols, respectively.

0

100

200

300

400

1969

1970

1975

1976

1984

1987

1989

1990

1991

YEAR

Tota

l Zin

c (u

g/L)

Page 120: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

112

Assessment of Potential Concerns

Background and Intent of Analysis Water quality criteria play an important role in the assessment, monitoring, and regulation of waterbodies. Often, many jurisdictions overlap a given park service unit, creating a complex amalgam of criteria. The specifics of these overlapping criteria have been previously described for this park service unit (Goodrich and Huggins 2003). Parameters of potential concern that may or may not currently be known to park management can be identified through comparison of existing data with relevant national criteria for aquatic life, human health, and drinking water. In order to facilitate the analysis of these potential concerns, national criteria and regional benchmark values were tabulated for comparison. Since the intent of this analysis was to identify parameters of concern, rather than determine specific attainment levels, and as most state, tribal, and local standards adhere in large part to published national criteria, a subset of all of the relevant criteria was used for analysis (Table 9). The aquatic life and human health criteria were either pulled directly from or derived according to the recently updated National Recommended Water Quality Criteria (USEPA 2004b). Similarly, the drinking water standard values for this analysis were those published in the 2004 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2004a). Regional benchmark values for total nitrogen, total phosphorous, and turbidity, currently under development by the Regional Technical Assistance Group for USEPA Region 7 (Table 8), were also included to gauge potential nutrient and water clarity concerns. A table of relevant criteria and their associated values and sources is included in the relational database for this park service unit. For actual attainment determinations, park managers should reference and confirm the most current and specific criteria and standards for the designated waterbody in question. Table 9. Included criteria for potential concern analysis. Criterion Category Criterion Name Criterion Source Aquatic Life Freshwater Criterion Maximum

Concentration (CMC) (acute) (USEPA 2004b)

Aquatic Life Freshwater Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC)

(USEPA 2004b)

Human Health Water + Organism Consumption (USEPA 2004b) Drinking Water Standard Maximum Contaminant Load

(MCL) (USEPA 2004a)

Water Quality Regional Benchmark Value (Huggins 2005) To be included in the potential concerns analysis, parameters had to have a published criterion in at least one of the previously detailed categories. For analytical purposes the most restrictive of these criteria for each given parameter was designated the “limit criterion.” For example, total arsenic has a Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) of 340 µg/L, a Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) of 150 µg/L, a Water-Organism Criterion of 0.018 µg/L, and a Maximum Contaminant Load (MCL) of 10 µg/L. The designated limit criterion is the most restrictive of these, namely 0.018 µg/L, and all of

Page 121: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

113

the observations of total arsenic in the screened data for this analysis were compared to this limit. In the case where only one criterion value was available, that criterion was used as the limit criterion. Designated limit criteria and their respective sources are included in Appendix D of this report. The data for this analysis were screened according to the methods described in the data handling section of this report. It is of particular importance to note that data used in the potential concerns analysis were devoid of remark codes. Ostensibly, this ensures that the results are not clouded by either analytical or reporting limits. However, since a significant portion of the available data were collected from the STORET system, which has had notoriously little data quality assurance, the results of the potential concerns analysis identify exactly that, potential concerns. Determination of the true nature and extent of actual water quality problems related to these concerns and any future corrective action that may be necessary will require more detailed, case-specific studies.

Method of Analysis This approach is intended to summarize a large amount of data into a form that is both intuitively understandable and inherently useful for park management decisions. The general concept of this analysis is to compare each observation to a relevant criterion value. Those parameters found to exceed their respective criteria on a consistent basis are then identified as “potential concerns.” For each waterbody with available data, a potential concerns analysis was performed both by parameter (Table 10) and by specific location and parameter (Table 11). Appendix E contains the data from which these summary tables were constructed. As a framework for interpretation of the results of these analyses, observations were grouped into four major categories: those having less than 20 total observations, those having between 20 and 50 total observations, those having between 50 and 100 total observations, and those having more than 100 observations. In addition, parameters were compared to criterion values published by USEPA (USEPA 2004a, b) and to CPCB recommended potential benchmark criteria (Huggins 2005). For each parameter, the percentage of total observations that exceeded the relevant designated limit criterion (termed “percent exceedance”) is noted in the appropriate column for its total observation count. For example, if 25 observations of a given parameter were made for a given waterbody, then its percent exceedance would be recorded in the 20-50 total observations column. Percent exceedance is itself denoted by specific symbols (shown here in parenthesis) for each of the following categories: 0 to 5% exceedance (-), 5 to 10% exceedance (+), 10 to 20% exceedance (++), and greater than 20% exceedance (+++). Each row is marked for percent exceedance in only one of the four columns designating total observation count, since the total observation count categories are mutually exclusive. These percentage groupings were established in order to generally characterize both future and current concerns. Additional analyses could modify the grouping categories to attain higher or lower resolution. As a rule of thumb, more plus signs to the right of the table identify greater areas of concern. This is for two reasons. First, higher percent exceedance values (i.e. more plus

Page 122: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

114

signs) tend to occur in areas with concentrations that are recurrently too high or too low for the parameter in question, compared to a limiting criterion. Second, higher sample sizes (i.e. more to the right) tend to give a better picture of the actual concentration of the parameter in question. For example, total arsenic noted (+++) in the (>100) Total Observations column would indicate more than 20% exceedance of the designated limit criterion for total arsenic in a sample size of more than 100 observations. This example would be a greater potential concern than a lower level of exceedance at the same sample size, since lower exceedance levels probably indicate lower actual concentrations of total arsenic. This would imply a greater potential concern than the same exceedance level at a lower sample size, since high exceedance at low sample sizes could be due to sampling error. Similarly, smaller sample sizes tend to have a greater potential for misrepresenting the actual in situ concentrations of a given parameter, since few exceedances in small sample sizes can constitute a relatively high percentage (consider 1 exceedance in two samples, versus 1 in 10 or 1 in 100). By applying this rule of thumb to the summary tables (Table 10, Table 11), park managers can quickly identify parameters and locations of potential concern for those waterbodies, locations, and parameters where data were suitable for analysis. As a final caveat, even though care has been taken to remove known reporting and detection limit values and poor data, many criterion values are very small. Often these criteria approach analytical limits. In future studies, great care must be taken to limit the impacts of sampling or laboratory errors, which can affect interpretation and management decisions, and to record reporting limits, which can skew data if they are not properly identified. In the end, it is up to park managers and relevant support staff to determine which levels of exceedance constitute truly significant concerns. Those concerns deemed significant should then be investigated through further sampling and analysis to better quantify the potential and actual impairment of the waterbody in question.

Park Specific Potential Concerns In general, the most frequently identified potential concerns for all waterbody types in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park can be divided into four categories: total phosphorus, toxic non-metals, potential pathogens, and toxic metals (Table 10, Table 11). While many compounds (including gamma-BHC and heptachlor epoxide in the Cuyahoga mainstem; antimony, chromium, and silver in several tributaries) showed relatively high percentages of exceedance (greater than 20%) in relatively smaller sample sizes (less than 20 observations), there were not enough viable data available to properly characterize these areas as significant or persistent problems by this method. Rather, they are here identified as potential concerns, with further sampling required to verify actual in situ concentrations. In such cases it is difficult to assess whether the relatively high percentage of exceedance is more related to sampling errors or small sample size than to actual water quality concerns. Similarly, relatively large sample sizes with relatively low (less than 5%) exceedance were identified in the summary tables, but not specifically referenced in the text of this analysis, since they represent the lowest level of potential concern, and may be artifacts of sampling or analysis. The data upon which the

Page 123: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

115

following summary tables (Table 10, Table 11) are based, including the limiting criteria values and their sources used in this analysis, appear in Appendix E. Total phosphorus is by far the most frequently identified potential concern, regardless of waterbody type. In the mainstem of the Cuyahoga River, total phosphorus exceeded the recommended regional benchmark (68 µg/L) in 5 to 10% of more than 100 observations at each of 6 stations, and in 10 to 20% of 50-100 observations at an additional 5 stations. Total phosphorus also exceeded the benchmark in at least 10% of 20-50 observations at 11 stations in the tributaries. Similarly, total phosphorus exceeded the benchmark in at least 5% of more than 100 observations at an additional 4 tributary stations. Of the assigned tributaries, Deer Lick Run and Mud Brook appeared to have the most potential concern for total phosphorus, with more than 20% exceedance in 20-50 and 50-100 observations, respectively. The Ohio Canal also had 10 to 20% exceedance in more than 100 observations of total phosphorus. The State of Ohio outside mixing zone maximum (OMZM) criterion for phosphorus is narrative and seeks to prevent adverse aesthetic conditions. Specifically, it states “Total phosphorus as P shall be limited to the extent necessary to prevent nuisance growths of algae, weeds, and slimes that result in a violation of the water quality criteria set forth in paragraph (E) of rule 3745-1-04 of the Administrative Code or, for public water supplies, that result in taste or odor problems. In areas where such nuisance growths exist, phosphorus discharges from point sources determined significant by the director shall not exceed a daily average of one milligram per liter as total P, or such stricter requirements as may be imposed by the director in accordance with the international joint commission (United States – Canada agreement)” (Ohio EPA 2002). A maximum of 1 mg/L for total phosphorus was also recommended by in the TMDL for the Lower Cuyahoga (Ohio EPA 2003). Although park managers may ultimately deem a higher benchmark concentration to be more appropriate for CUVA, the CPCB benchmark of 68 µg/L (0.068 mg/L) represents a realistic target concentration for total phosphorus in high quality rivers and streams of the central plains. Total arsenic also frequently exceeded its relevant limiting criterion value of 0.018 µg/L for human health (USEPA 2004b). On the mainstem of the Cuyahoga, one station had more than 20% exceedance in 20-50 observations, one station had 10 to 20% exceedance in 50-100 observations, and 4 stations had at least 5% exceedance in greater than 100 observations. Similarly, 5 tributary stations had more than 20% exceedance in 20-50 observations, 3 had at least 10% exceedance in 50-100 observations, and one had 5 to 10% exceedance in more than 100 observations. Point sources had 10 to 20% exceedance in 20-50 observations at one station and in 50-100 observations at another. Total arsenic concentrations also exceeded the criterion value in 10 to 20% of over 100 point source observations combined. These exceedances may be due to the relatively low Human Health criterion (Water-Organism) for arsenic (0.018 µg/L), compared to its other criteria (CMC = 340 µg/L, CCC = 150 µg/L, MCL = 10 µg/L, State of Ohio OMZA = 50 µg/L for drinking, State of Ohio OMZA = 100 µg/L for agricultural use), or they may be the result of exceptionally high and widespread arsenic concentrations. Given the extent and magnitude of other known impairments and the designated uses of park waterbodies, further arsenic investigation may or may not be a park priority at this time. Total cyanide has a limiting criterion value of 0.0052 mg/L, which is the USEPA freshwater criterion chronic concentration (CCC) for aquatic life. Total cyanide

Page 124: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

116

exceeded this criterion in 10 to 20% of 20-50 observations at point source stations, 10 to 20% in more than 100 observations on Mill Creek, and 5 to 10% of more than 100 observations on Tinkers Creek and the Little Cuyahoga River. Potential pathogens, represented by total counts of membrane filtered Escheria coli per 100 mL, are not to exceed the State of Ohio primary contact criterion (298 per 100mL) in more than 10% of samples (Ohio EPA 2002). However, this criterion was exceeded in more than 20% of 20-50 observations at one mainstem station (CUVA0054) and in 10 to 20% of 50-100 observations at another (CUVA0121). The criterion was also exceeded in 10 to 20% of 20-50 observations at a Mud Brook station (CUVA0067) and on one unassigned tributary station (CUVA0065) and in less than 20 observations at another (CUVA0107). E. coli counts also exceeded the primary contact criterion in 5 to 10% of more than 100 observations at each of two tributary stations (CUVA0173 on Tinkers Creek and CUVA0140 on Brandywine Creek). While E. coli criteria are also tied to season, number of measurements within a given time period, and designated use, the application of these additional factors was beyond the scope of this analysis. Dissolved and total cadmium, total lead, and total copper all had 5 to 10% exceedance in at least 50 observation at two or more stations on the Cuyahoga mainstem. Total manganese and total aluminum also had more than 20% exceedance in 20-50 observations at two mainstem stations, with aluminum also showing similar exceedance at two point source stations. Potential concerns for metal contamination of the tributaries include total aluminum, total copper, total manganese, total mercury, total nickel, total silver, total selenium, total lead, and total cadmium, with the latter two exceeding criterion values in at least 10% of at least 20 observations at four and five tributary stations, respectively. Of the highest potential concern tributaries, Deer Lick Run, Mill Creek, and Dickerson Run all had multiple metal exceedances of at least 10%, with Deer Lick Run having the most (4) and Dickerson Run having the fewest (1). Total lead, total cadmium, total copper, and total zinc were also identified as the most recurrent potential problems for unassigned tributaries. In all cases, since the toxicity of cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc are all dependent on hardness, characterization of the actual in situ effects of these metals is difficult to assess without concurrent hardness data. For the purposes of this analysis, a representative hardness of 200 mg/L as CaCO3 was used, based on average observed hardness for similar waterbodies in the area. Relevant criteria for comparison were calculated using USEPA guidelines and this estimated value. For the purposes of this analysis, 200 mg/L as CaCO3 is an overestimate of the hardness of the waters within the park, giving a more conservative criterion value for identifying potential metal toxicity concerns. Turbidity was also identified as a potential concern at two mainstem stations (CUVA0120 and CUVA0203 both had 5 to 10% exceedance in at least 50 observations) and one tributary station on Tinkers Creek (CUV0167 had 5 to 10% exceedance in 50-100 observations), based on a CPCB recommended benchmark value of 10.4 NTU. No additional potential concerns having at least 20 observations were identified by this analysis.

Page 125: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

117

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) - 1 Cuyahoga River ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) - 1 Cuyahoga River X ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) - 1 Cuyahoga River X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) - 1 Cuyahoga River ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 1 Cuyahoga River X CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) + 1 Cuyahoga River X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) - 1 Cuyahoga River X

CHLORDANE(TECH MIX & METABS),WHOLE WATER,UG/L +++

1 Cuyahoga River CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L + 1 Cuyahoga River X COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) - 1 Cuyahoga River X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 1 Cuyahoga River X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River X DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River

E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML -

1 Cuyahoga River X GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE WATER,UG/L +++ 1 Cuyahoga River X

HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) +++

1 Cuyahoga River X LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) - 1 Cuyahoga River X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 1 Cuyahoga River MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) -

Page 126: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

118

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 1 Cuyahoga River X MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 1 Cuyahoga River X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) - 1 Cuyahoga River X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) - 1 Cuyahoga River NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 Cuyahoga River NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) - 1 Cuyahoga River NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 1 Cuyahoga River PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU - 1 Cuyahoga River PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 1 Cuyahoga River X SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River X SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) - 1 Cuyahoga River X SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) - 1 Cuyahoga River TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN

TURB UNIT) -

1 Cuyahoga River TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

- 1 Cuyahoga River X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Mill Creek ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) + 2 Mill Creek X ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) +++ 2 Mill Creek X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 2 Mill Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) - 2 Mill Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Mill Creek X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) + 2 Mill Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) -

Page 127: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

119

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Mill Creek X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L ++ 2 Mill Creek X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Mill Creek MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) ++ 2 Mill Creek X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) + 2 Mill Creek X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) ++ 2 Mill Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Mill Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Mill Creek X THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) +++ 2 Mill Creek X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Tinkers Creek ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) + 2 Tinkers Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Tinkers Creek X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) - 2 Tinkers Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 2 Tinkers Creek X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L + 2 Tinkers Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Tinkers Creek E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE

#/100ML +

2 Tinkers Creek X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Tinkers Creek MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) - 2 Tinkers Creek X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) + 2 Tinkers Creek NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) -

Page 128: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

120

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Tinkers Creek NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L - 2 Tinkers Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Tinkers Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Tinkers Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Tinkers Creek TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN

TURB UNIT) +

2 Tinkers Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

- 2 Tinkers Creek X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Deer Lick Run X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run PH (STANDARD UNITS) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) +++ 2 Chippewa Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) ++ 2 Chippewa Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Chippewa Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Chippewa Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Chippewa Creek X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Chippewa Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +

Page 129: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

121

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Chippewa Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Brandywine Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Brandywine Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Brandywine Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Brandywine Creek E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE

#/100ML +

2 Brandywine Creek X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Brandywine Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Brandywine Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Brandywine Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Boston Run X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Boston Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Boston Run X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Boston Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Boston Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Salt Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Salt Run X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Salt Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Salt Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Salt Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Dickerson Run X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Dickerson Run X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +

Page 130: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

122

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Dickerson Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Dickerson Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Dickerson Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Dickerson Run X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 2 Furnace Run X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Furnace Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Furnace Run X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Furnace Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Furnace Run X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Furnace Run PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Furnace Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Furnace Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Yellow Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Yellow Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Yellow Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Yellow Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Yellow Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Yellow Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Mud Brook E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

++ 2 Mud Brook PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +

Page 131: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

123

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Little Cuyahoga River CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Little Cuyahoga River X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L + 2 Little Cuyahoga River X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) + 2 Little Cuyahoga River X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River PH (STANDARD UNITS) 2 Little Cuyahoga River PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River X SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River X SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 2 Ohio Canal X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Ohio Canal X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L + 2 Ohio Canal X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Ohio Canal X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Ohio Canal X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Ohio Canal PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Ohio Canal X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Spring Creek X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Spring Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Spring Creek X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Spring Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML -

Page 132: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

124

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Spring Creek X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Spring Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Spring Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Spring Creek X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Haskell Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Haskell Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Haskell Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Haskell Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

2 Springfield Lake Outlet X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Springfield Lake Outlet X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Springfield Lake Outlet X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE

#/100ML ++

2 Unassigned Tributary X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Unassigned Tributary PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Unassigned Tributary TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU -

Page 133: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 10. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody and parameter. 1 (continued)

125

Total Observation Count 4 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 3Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100 2 Unassigned Tributary X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 3 WWTP outfall ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 3 WWTP outfall X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 3 WWTP outfall X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L ++ 3 WWTP outfall NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) - 3 WWTP outfall PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 3 WWTP outfall PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 3 Industrial outfall PH (STANDARD UNITS) ++

NOTES: 1 Percent exceedance is defined as the number of observations that exceed the designated limit criterion value divided by the total number of

observations multiplied by 100. As a rule of thumb, more plusses at higher observation counts suggest greater potential concerns. See discussion of limit criterion values in this section. A list of values and sources is in the Appendix. - indicates 0 to 5% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value + indicates 5 to 10% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value ++ indicates 10 to 20% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value +++ indicates more than 20% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value

2 1 = Main Stem, 2 = Tributaries, 3 = Springs, 4 = Lentic Waters, 5 = Point Sources 3 X indicates that this parameter is a USEPA priority pollutant (USEPA 2004b) 4 Total Observation Counts are for those parameters which have some percentage of exceedance. Parameters without any exceedances were

not included in this analysis.

Page 134: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

126

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody

Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS STATID3

USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0054 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0057 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0057 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0061 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +

Page 135: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

127

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0069 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0069 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +

Page 136: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

128

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0086 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML -

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0115 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0121 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0122 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0128 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0128 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++

Page 137: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

129

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0129 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0129 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0141 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0146 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X CHLORDANE(TECH MIX & METABS),WHOLE

WATER,UG/L +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L +

Page 138: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

130

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) ++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN

TURB UNIT) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) -

Page 139: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

131

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE WATER,UG/L +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER

SAMPLE (UG/L) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN

TURB UNIT) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0209 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0209 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +

Page 140: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

132

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) +++ 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0249 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML + 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) + 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) +++ 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) + 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L ++ 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) ++ 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) + 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) ++ 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) +++

Page 141: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

133

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) -

Page 142: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

134

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN

TURB UNIT) + 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0173 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML + 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0189 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0189 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) +

Page 143: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

135

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) ++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L + 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) - 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 PH (STANDARD UNITS) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) +++ 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) ++ 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L -

Page 144: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

136

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0126 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0126 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0127 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0127 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0133 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0140 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML +

Page 145: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

137

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0144 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0145 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML -

Page 146: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

138

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Mud Brook CUVA0067 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML ++ 2 Mud Brook CUVA0100 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Mud Brook CUVA0101 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0007 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0007 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0007 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0009 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0013 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0015 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0015 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0015 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0015 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++

Page 147: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

139

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0017 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0017 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0017 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0019 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0019 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0020 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0020 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0020 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0021 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0021 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0040 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0040 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0040 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0043 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0043 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0043 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0043 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0043 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) + 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) + 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +

Page 148: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

140

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) + 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0044 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0045 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0045 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0045 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0045 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0045 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0046 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0046 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Little Cuyahoga River CUVA0051 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L +++

Page 149: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

141

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 X NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0022 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0022 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0035 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++

Page 150: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

142

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Ohio Canal CUVA0035 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0212 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0212 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++

Page 151: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

143

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Springfield Lake Outlet CUVA0016 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) +++ 2 Springfield Lake Outlet CUVA0016 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Springfield Lake Outlet CUVA0016 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet CUVA0003 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet CUVA0003 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0023 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0065 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0087 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++

Page 152: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

144

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0103 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0105 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0107 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML -

Page 153: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

145

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0113 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0118 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0118 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0118 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0118 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0118 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0132 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0147 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++

Page 154: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

146

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0153 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) ++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 X LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0159 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 X CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) +++ 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 X COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) + 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY

UNITS, NTU - 2 Unassigned Tributary CUVA0163 X ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) ++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++

Page 155: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

147

Total Observation Count 5 Waterbody Code 2 Waterbody Name NPS

STATID3 USEPA Priority

Pollutant4Parameter Description

<20 20-50 50-100 >100

3 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) - 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 PH (STANDARD UNITS) - 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) + 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0099 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) ++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L +++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) +++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) +++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 X ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) ++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 X CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L ++ 3 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) - 3 Industrial outfall CUVA0228 PH (STANDARD UNITS) ++

Page 156: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

Table 11. Total observation count and percent criteria exceedance by waterbody, location, and parameter. 1 (continued)

148

NOTES: 1 Percent exceedance is defined as the number of observations that exceed the designated limit criterion value divided by the total number of

observations multiplied by 100. As a rule of thumb, more plusses at higher observation counts suggest greater potential concerns. See discussion of limit criterion values in this section. A list of values and sources is in the Appendix. - indicates 0 to 5% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value + indicates 5 to 10% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value ++ indicates 10 to 20% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value +++ indicates more than 20% of observations exceed designated limit criterion value

2 1 = Main Stem, 2 = Tributaries, 3 = Springs, 4 = Lentic Waters, 5 = Point Sources 3 Station code as designated by NPS. See Figure 1, Table 5, and Appendix B for additional station location information. 4 X indicates that this parameter is a USEPA priority pollutant (USEPA 2004b) 5 Total Observation Counts are for those parameters which have some percentage of exceedance. Parameters without any exceedances were

not included in this analysis.

Page 157: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

149

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the water quality analyses in this report and on the various processes required for their development, the following recommendations are made: Exchange information with other agencies that study park-related waters. For example, Ohio EPA and USGS also perform water quality research in the Cuyahoga basin. Since major portions of the Cuyahoga River are currently listed as impaired by Ohio EPA, it is apparent that significant water quality research efforts and literature are already associated with waters relevant to CUVA. Information sharing, including data exchange, circulation of published reports, and contact between data managers and relevant staff, could greatly benefit all parties involved. Relate sampling locations to relevant regulatory waterbody segments. In order to make decisions within a regulatory context, it is important to know which stations are within which regulatory unit. Without easily accessible or fairly precise spatial information, it is difficult to ascertain whether stations contribute to a particular subbasin in a watershed or not. Without this knowledge, it is also difficult to assess the relative water quality at a given site in comparison to its relationship with the watershed, both upstream and downstream. For example, Ohio EPA currently has a system of spatial identification for the Cuyahoga and other river and stream segments, based both on river miles and assessment units. Current CUVA sampling stations should be related to these spatial indices for more meaningful analyses and future data comparisons. Be sure to document and standardize metadata. Institutional knowledge of station locations, sampling methods, and data handling must be clearly recorded. The implementation of this recommendation is likely a service- or network-wide concern, but each park should be prepared to contribute. The National Research Council has characterized some of the relevant concerns and applications associated with metadata. An executive summary of their recommendations is available at http://www.nap.edu/execsumm_pdf/4896.pdf. Standardize database files. Rigorous adherence to standards is the key to automating data extraction and analysis, especially with data field names (e.g. DissolvedOxygen, DO, DissOxy) and field types (e.g. text, number, date). NPS has begun to institute servicewide data standards and has been developing new data entry and management tools that should aid in this regard. Be sure to uniquely define sampling locations. For proper statistical analysis and relational database development, every observation must be linked to a unique place and time. Based on the scale of analysis (e.g. riffle versus watershed), sites may be grouped for analysis, but their original identity should be clearly maintained by documentation. Establish a sampling design for long-term trend analysis. In order to appropriately characterize trends over the long term (decades to centuries), comparable sampling

Page 158: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

150

procedures and efforts should be maintained throughout the period of comparison. The goals of trend analysis should be clearly defined to address the scale of the trends being monitored (e.g. differences between months, seasons, years, stations, tributaries, waterbody types), so that sampling design can accommodate the statistical requirements for discerning the desired scale of change. Take hardness measurements concurrently with metals. Several priority pollutant metals vary in toxicity with hardness. Future studies should include hardness as part of the sampling regime. Take pH and temperature measurements concurrently with ammonia. Ammonia toxicity is dependent on both pH and water temperature. Since pH and water temperature fluctuate on multiple scales (hourly, daily, weekly, etc.), it is difficult to assess ammonia toxicity without concurrent measurements of these parameters. Develop study areas along watershed boundaries. Watershed boundaries provide more meaningful study areas than arbitrary upstream or downstream distances. By placing future assessments within a watershed framework, park managers will be better able to recognize the limits of their control over water quality within their parks, and they will also be able to identify the relevant entities whose cooperation will be required for water quality conservation and improvement. Correlate water quality parameters with actual park use. Some water quality concerns, especially turbidity and fecal coliforms, may be highly correlated to the number of users and the type of use of park waterbodies. Without an understanding of the amount and pattern of park usage, it is difficult to assess its impacts on water quality. In some cases, these impacts may be very significant to waters within and downstream from the park.

Page 159: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

151

REFERENCES CITED Chambers, J., W. Cleveland, et al. (1983). Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Boston,

MA, Duxbury Press. Dodds, W. K., J. R. Jones, et al. (1998). "Suggested Classification Of Stream Trophic

State: Distributions Of Temperate Stream Types By Chlorophyll, Total Nitrogen, And Phosphorus." Water Resource 32(5): 1455-1462.

Francy, D. S., D. N. Myers, et al. (1993). "Escheria coli and fecal coliform bacteria as indicators of recreational water quality." WRI 93-4083. Water-Resources Investigations, US Geological Survey. Columbus, OH. 34pp.

Goodrich, C. and D. Huggins (2003). "National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program: Review of state water quality standards applicable to Heartland Network Parks." Central Plains Center for BioAssessment, Kansas Biological Survey. 200.

Goodrich, C., D. Huggins, et al. (2004). "Summary of State and National Biological Assessment Methods, Physical Habitat Assessment Methods, and Biological Criteria." Central Plains Center for BioAssessment, Kansas Biological Survey. 97.

Hintze, J. L. (2004). NCSS: Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, UT, NCSS. Hintze, J. L. and R. D. Nelson (1998). "Violin Plots: A Box Plot-Density Trace

Synergism." The American Statistician 52: 181-184. Hoaglin, D., F. Mosteller, et al. (1993). Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data

Analysis. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Huggins, D. G. (2005). Potential benchmark values for nutrient stressors and other

associated variables derived using multiple approaches, Unpublished. Developed as part of USEPA Region 7 Regional Technical Assistance Group investigation of nutrient criteria for rivers and streams.

Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, et al. (1986). "Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters A Method and Its Rationale." Special Publication. Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign. 1-28.

Larsen, D. P., J. M. Omernik, et al. (1986). "Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in Ohio Streams and aquatic ecoregions." Environmental Management 10(6): 815-828.

National Park Service (1995). "Baseline Water Quality Data Inventory and Analysis: Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area." NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-95/59. Water Res. Div., Nat. Park Serv., US Dept. of Interior. Washington, D.C.

Ohio EPA (1990). "The use of biocriteria in the Ohio EPA surface water monitoring and assessment program." Eco. Assess. Sec., Div. Water Qual. Plan. and Assess, Ohio Environ. Protect. Agency. Columbia, OH.

Ohio EPA (1999). "Biological and Water Quality Study of the Cuyahoga River and Selected Tributaries: Geauga, Portage, Summit and Cuyahoga Counties (Ohio)." OEPA Tech. Report MAS/1997-12-4, Vol. 1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 124pp.

Ohio EPA (2002). "Water Quality Standards (State Rules). Chapter 3745-1 of the Ohio Administrative Code." Standards & Technical Support Section, Division of Surface Water, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

Page 160: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

152

Ohio EPA (2003). "Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Lower Cuyahoga River, Final Report." Division of Water, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 101pp.

Ohio EPA (2006). "Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report: prepared to fulfill the requirements of Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 of the Clean Water Act." Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 111pp.

Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, et al. (1989). "Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use In Streams And Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates And Fish." U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C. 1-?

Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY, HarperCollins College Publishers.

Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley. USEPA (1996). "Biological Criteria: Technical guidance for streams and small rivers,

revised edition." EPA 822-B-96-001. US Environ. Protect. Agency, Office of Water. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2000a). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 6." EPA 822-B-00-017. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2000b). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 7." EPA 822-B-00-018. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2000c). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 9." EPA 822-B-00-019. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2000d). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 11." EPA 822-B-00-020. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2001a). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 4." EPA 822-B-01-013. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2001b). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 5." EPA 822-B-01-014. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2001c). "Ambient Water Quality Criteria Recommendations, Information Supporting the Development of State and Tribal Nutrient Criteria, Rivers and Streams in Nutrient Ecoregion 10." EPA 822-B-01-016. USEPA. Washington, D.C.

USEPA (2004a). "2004 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories." EPA 822-R-04-005. US Environ. Protect. Agency, Office of Water. Washington, D.C.

Page 161: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

153

USEPA (2004b). "National Recommended Water Quality Criteria." US Environ. Protect. Agency, Office of Water. Washington, D.C.

Page 162: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

A-1

APPENDIX A: CPCB Algorithm for Location Grouping (November 2003) For analysis, unique locations were characterized according to the following process:

RULE – Sample sites that are nominally within 2 km of each other are considered to be at the same location.

Exceptions: 1. Look at Strahler order - if different - then they are different sites. 2. Look at database information for sites in the same source database: descriptive information may indicate special circumstances or details warranting separate treatment 3. Look on GIS map - does a tributary come between the sites? If yes, then the sites are different. 4. Look on GIS map and location description - does a waste water/sewage treatment plant come between the sites? If yes, then the sites are different. Upstream of plant is different than downstream regardless of distance. 5. Look on GIS map - lots of sites in a row. Weed out those intersected by tributaries or treatment plants. Use measure tool to measure 1st and last site -

if < 2 km, and nothing in between, then all same site. if > 2 km, then sites closest to each other are same site.

6. Look on GIS map - if one site is off of the stream - look in gazetteer to see if there is a tributary not showing up in GIS. If no tributary indicated, then this will be a judgment call based on distance and site description.

Page 163: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

B-1

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database 232 stations with geographic information were included in the database for the Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA). Water quality observations were made at 227 of these. Stream code and waterbody code information was added only for those stations included in the analyses in this report. For additional information concerning stations, see the data collection and handling portions of this report. NPS

StationID1 Waterbody

Code2 Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0001 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE IN AKRON - KENMORE RD.

R06P13 41.0456 -81.5442 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY SUMMIT LAKE (OHIO CANAL) AT KENMORE RD IN AKRON RMI=809.19/111.13/110.69/0.10/6.79 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 12/24/79-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0002 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - KENMORE BLVD. (RM 3.60)

F01A03 41.0481 -81.5439 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE KENMORE BLVD. BRIDGE, ON THE SOUTHERN TIP OF SUMMIT LAKE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 164: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-2

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0003 Tributaries 5018 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET AT MOGADORE RD. (RM 0.53)

F01S95 41.0508 -81.3919 OHIO PORTAGE

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - PORTAGE CO.; LOCATED AT THE MOGADORE RD. BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM SHELL OIL CO. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0004 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF SOUTH BASIN

F01A14 41.0528 -81.5453 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE LAKE, SOUTHWEST OF THE BOAT DOCKS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0005 Tributaries 5017 Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT MASSILLON RD (RM 0.5)

F01S93 41.0539 -81.4631 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE MASSILLON RD. BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM THE U.S.G.S. GAGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 165: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-3

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0006 Tributaries 5018 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET AT MOUTH - UNNAMED RD.

F01S94 41.0547 -81.3986 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT AN UNNAMED ROAD BRIDGE JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE WITH THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0007 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - GILCHRIST RD.

F01S87 41.0547 -81.4003 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE GILCHRIST RD. BRIDGE, JUST NORTH OF MOGADORE; DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0008 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF CENTRAL BASIN

F01A13 41.0547 -81.5456 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE CENTRAL PORTION OF THE LAKE, WEST OF IRA AVE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 166: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-4

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0009 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - UPST NORTON CO.

F01S86 41.0558 -81.4231 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE NORTON CO. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0010 Tributaries 5017 Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT AKRON OH

04205000 41.0558 -81.4644 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0011 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal SUMMIT LK NR MIDPOINT AT AKRON OH

410323081324700

41.0564 -81.5464 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0012 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal SUMMIT LAKE AT AKRON - MIDDLE OF NORTH BASIN

F01A12 41.0575 -81.5458 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF THE NORTH PORTION OF THE LAKE, EAST OF CLEARVIEW PARK. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 167: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-5

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0013 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - DST UNIV. MATERIALS

F01S88 41.0581 -81.4322 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF WINGFOOT LAKE OUTLET; DOWNSTREAM FROM UNIVERSAL MATERIALS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0014 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

MOGADORE RE AB DAM NR MOGADORE OH

410331081223900

41.0586 -81.3775 OHIO PORTAGE

112WRD

CUVA0015 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON- SEIBERLING ST (RM 6.67)

F01S83 41.0592 -81.4719 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE SEIBERLING ST. BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM SEVERAL DISCHARGERS. DOWNSTREAM FROM SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0016 Tributaries 5017 Springfield Lake Outlet

SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET AT AKRON - AT MOUTH

F01S92 41.0594 -81.4636 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE MOUTH, JUST WEST OF MASSILLON RD. IN AKRON. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 168: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-6

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0017 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - MASSILLON RD (RM 7.15)

F01S84 41.0603 -81.4628 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE MASSILLON RD. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF SPRINGFIELD LAKE OUTLET. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0018 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L CUYAHOGA R AT MASSILLON RD AKRON OH

04204500 41.0603 -81.4633 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0019 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CHENEY RD. (RM 8.7)

F01S85 41.0625 -81.44 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE CHENEY ST. BRIDGE (ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, IN AKRON. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0020 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L CUYAHOGA R AT MOGADORE OH

04204000 41.0631 -81.3939 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 169: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-7

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0021 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. NR MOGADORE - S.R. 532 (RM 11.75)

F01S89 41.0636 -81.3944 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE ST. RT. 532 BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM THE UNION OIL TRIBUTARY; DOWNSTREAM FROM HILLS POND. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0022 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - THORNTON ST. (RM 2.22)

F01A04 41.0661 -81.5361 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE THORNTON ST. BRIDGE, 0.6 MILES NORTHEAST OF SUMMIT LAKE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0023 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

TRIB TO L CUYAHOGA R DST UNION OIL- SOUTHEAST AV

F01S97 41.0686 -81.3969 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED DOWNSTREAM FROM THE SOUTHEAST AVE. BRIDGE; DOWNSTREAM FROM UNION OIL; NORTH OF MOGADORE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0024 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE002

390166 41.0706 -81.5319 OHIO 12OHDO

Page 170: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-8

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0025 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE001

390165 41.0706 -81.5322 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0026 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE005

390169 41.0708 -81.5314 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0027 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE004

390168 41.0708 -81.5317 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0028 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE003

390167 41.0708 -81.5319 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0029 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE006

390170 41.0711 -81.5311 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0030 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B.F.GOODRICH-STORM EFFL. NR 010

390175 41.0711 -81.5314 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0031 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE007

390171 41.0714 -81.5311 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0032 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE008

390172 41.0717 -81.5308 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0033 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal B. F. GOODRICH - INTAKE 010

390174 41.0722 -81.5292 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0034 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

041 L CUYAHOGA R AT AKRON OH

410424081290400

41.0733 -81.4844 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 171: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-9

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0035 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - BANK ST. (RM 5.11)

F01S82 41.0733 -81.4847 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BANK ST. BRIDGE, IN AKRON. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0036 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

B. F. GOODRICH - EFFL. COE009

390173 41.0739 -81.5278 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0037 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - CEDAR ST. (RM 1.30)

F01A02 41.0761 -81.5247 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE CEDAR ST. BRIDGE IN AKRON; JUST SOUTH OF WEST EXCHANGE ST. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0038 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL DST STATE ST. IN AKRON (RM=1.05)

F01T03 41.0799 -81.5219 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WQ STUDY. LOCATION - OHIO CANAL JUST DST OF STATE STREET IN AKRON AT THE TRANSOHIO GARAGE, RIVER MILE 1.05, JUST EAST OF CHILDRENS HOSPITAL. COLLECTION - 1987 SAMPLING CONDUCTED BY NEDO.

21OHIO

Page 172: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-10

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0039 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

CHESSIE TRIB AT AKRON - EASTWOOD AVE. (RM 0.05)

F01S90 41.0861 -81.4869 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE EASTWOOD AVE. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE WITH THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0040 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - NORTH ST. (EAST)

F01S81 41.0875 -81.4908 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE EAST CROSSING OF NORTH ST. IN AKRON; DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF THE CHESSIE TRIBUTARY. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0041 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - ELIZABETH PARK

F01A15 41.0906 -81.5111 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER BASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BRIDGE NEAR ELIZABETH PARK, JUST UPSTREAM FROM NORTH MAIN ST. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 173: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-11

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0042 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT AKRON - NORTH ST. (RM 0.18)

F01A01 41.0911 -81.5178 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE NORTH ST. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM CONFLUENCE WITH THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0043 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CUYAHOGA ST. (RM 2.14)

F01S99 41.0925 -81.5169 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE CUYAHOGA ST. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF THE OHIO CANAL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0044 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - OTTO ST GAGE (RM 1.85)

502080, P0802

41.0944 -81.5217 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - PWQMN STATION - MONITOR QUALITY BEFORE ITS CONFLUENCE WITH ANOTHER STREAM. (CUYAHOGA R.) LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; END OF OTTO ST. WHICH INTERSECTS WITH CUYAHOGA ST. .5 MI. FROM TALLMADGE AVE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA - NORTHEAST DIST. - 216-425-9171

21OHIO

CUVA0045 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L CUYAHOGA R BL OHIO CA AT AKRON OH

04205700 41.0944 -81.5217 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 174: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-12

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0046 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

CHESSIE TRIB AT AKRON - BRITTAIN RD. (RM 1.61)

F01S91 41.0947 -81.4669 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER SUBBASIN. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BRITTAIN RD. BRIDGE, WEST OF TALMADGE; NORTH OF GOODYEAR HEIGHTS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0047 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L CUYAHOGA R AT MEMORIAL PKWY NR AKRON OH

410614081314000

41.1039 -81.5278 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0048 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - MEMORIAL PARKWAY

F01A36 41.1042 -81.5275 OHIO STARK PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE MEMORIAL PARKWAY BRIDGE NEAR THE MOUTH. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0049 Tributaries 5014 Schocalog Run

041 SCHOCALOG RN NR FAIRLAWN OH

410644081365300

41.1122 -81.6147 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0050 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

LITTLE CUYAHOGA RIVER

380225, 060398000400, 060398044400

41.1142 -81.5283 OHIO SUMMIT BEHIND CITY WORKHOUSE 0.1 MI W OF CUYAHOGA ST. IN N AKRON, 1.0 MI N OF ROUTE 18 TALLMADGE AVE. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FROM USGS MAP MILEAGE-INDEX CODING PROVISIONAL

1115E050

Page 175: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-13

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0051 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

L. CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - NEAR MOUTH

502180 41.1147 -81.5275 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MONITOR WATER QUALITY FOR DETERMINING IMPACT STREAM HAS ON THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO., NW OF COUNTY WORKHOUSE ON CUYAHOGA ST. STATION CAN BE REACHED BY A SMALL DIRT ROAD JUST NORTH OF WORKHOUSE. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLES BY AKRON WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAB.

21OHIO

CUVA0052 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - CUYAHOGA ST.

502150 41.1169 -81.525 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MEASURES THE WATER QUALITY BEFORE CONFLUENCE OF L. CUYAHOGA. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; ON CUYAHOGA ST. BRIDGE NORTH OF AKRON. STREET PARALLELS U.S. 8 APPROX. 1 MILE. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLE BY AKRON WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAB.

21OHIO

CUVA0053 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT STATION RD.

502170 41.1169 -81.525 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MEASURES LONG TERM IMPACT OF AKRON S.T.P. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; JUST SOUTH OF RT. 82 ON STATION RD. BRIDGE WHICH CAN BE REACHED FROM RIVERVIEW RD. OR ROUTE 82. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLES BY AKRON WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAB.

21OHIO

CUVA0054 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT CUYAHOGA ST NR AKRON OH

410701081313200

41.1169 -81.5256 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 176: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-14

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0055 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON- OHIO ED. DAM POOL RM=45.1

F01S74 41.1192 -81.4919 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED THE OHIO EDISON DAM POOL AREA, UPSTREAM FROM ST. RT. 5 IN AKRON. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0056 Tributaries 5012 Little Cuyahoga R

LITTLE CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - AT MOUTH

F01S78 41.1192 -81.5289 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE WITH THE CUYAHOGA RIVER, IN AKRON. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0057 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT AKRON - DST GORGE DAM

F01A60 41.1233 -81.5108 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE SURVEY OF THE LOWER CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED DOWNSTREAM FROM THE GORGE DAM, DOWNSTREAM FROM MAIN ST. COLLECTED BY THE OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0058 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AB OLD PORTAGE OH

410741081321700

41.1281 -81.5381 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 177: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-15

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0059 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST OLD PORTAGE TRAIL (RM 40.4)

F01S73 41.1333 -81.5464 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED UPSTREAM FROM THE U.S.G.S. GAGE AT OLD PORTAGE TRAIL; WEST OF CUYAHOGA FALLS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0060 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA RIVER AT BROAD BLVD.

390142 41.1336 -81.4819 OHIO SUMMIT 12OHDO

CUVA0061 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT CUYAHOGA FALLS- BROAD BLVD RM=46.2

F01S16 41.1336 -81.4825 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BROAD BLVD. BRIDGE IN CUYAHOGA FALLS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0062 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST AKRON WWTP - OLD PORTAGE TRAIL

502160 41.1353 -81.5475 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MEASURES WATER QUALITY ABOVE AKRON S.T.P. BUT BELOW LITTLE CUYAHOGA CONFLUENCE. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF AKRON-PENINSULA RD. AND PORTAGE TRAIL AT THE SITE OF THE OLD PORTAGE TRAIL. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLES BY AKRON WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAB.

21OHIO

CUVA0063 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT OLD PORTAGE OH

04206000 41.1356 -81.5472 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 178: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-16

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0064 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK NR STONEY HILL - S.R. 18

F01P18 41.1356 -81.635 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; YELLOW CREEK AT SR 18 NEAR STONEY HILL RMI=1187.93/37.16/8.48 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/23/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0065 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

SAND RN AT OLD PORTAGE OH

410817081334700

41.1381 -81.5631 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0066 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MUD BROOK N OF AKRON - AKRON-PENINSULA RD.

F01P24 41.1389 -81.5481 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; MUD BROOK AT AKRON-PENNINSULA ROAD N OF AKRON RMI=1187.93/39.78/0.18 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/24/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0067 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MUD BK AT AKRON-PENINSULA ROAD NR AKRON OH

04206050 41.1389 -81.5483 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0068 MUD BROOK NR CUYAHOGA FALLS - S.R. 8

F01P26 41.1528 -81.5089 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE- OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEY LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; MUD BROOK AT STATE ROUTE 8 BELOW DAM; NORTH SIDE OF CUYAHOGA FALLS RMI-1187.93/39.78/3.13 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE

21OHIO

Page 179: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-17

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0069 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST AKRON WWTP - AT TRUNKLINE

502200 41.1528 -81.5681 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - TO DETERMINE WATER QUALITY ABOVE AKRON STP. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; AT TRUNKLINE .75 MILE UPSTREAM FROM AKRON STP DISCHARGE. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLES TAKEN BY AKRON WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT

21OHIO

CUVA0070 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA RIVER ABOVE AKRON STP

390141 41.1542 -81.5689 OHIO SUMMIT 12OHDO

CUVA0071 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R NR BOTZUM OH

410915081342100

41.1542 -81.5725 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0072 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CRK AT PRIVATE DRIVE, 2.84 MI UPST MOUTH

F01W55 41.1553 -81.6111 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION - YELLOW CREEK BETWEEN GHENT AND BOTZUM AT PRIVATE DRIVE, 2.84 MI. UPSTREAM OF MOUTH. ACCESS FROM YELLOW CREEK ROAD. COLLECTION - 1990 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA USGS QUAD = PENINSULA

21OHIO

CUVA0073 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CRK AT PRIVATE DRIVE, 3.31 MI UPST MOUTH

F01W54 41.1558 -81.6175 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION - YELLOW CREEK BETWEEN GHENT AND BOTZUM AT PRIVATE DRIVE, 3.31 MI. UPSTREAM OF MOUTH. ACCESS FROM YELLOW CREEK RD. COLLECTION - 1991 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA USGS QUAD = PENINSULA

21OHIO

Page 180: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-18

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0074 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK DST GHENT - YELLOW CREEK RD.

F01P16 41.1572 -81.6306 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; YELLOW CREEK AT YELLOW CREEK ROAD BELOW GHENT RMI=1187.93/37.16/4.08 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/23/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0075 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK AT GHENT - 0.1 MI UPST WYE RD.

F01P17 41.1581 -81.6394 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; YELLOW RIVER 0.10 MILES UPSTREAM OF WYE ROAD AT GHENT RMI=1187.93/37.16/4.74 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

CUVA0076 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA RIVER AT AKRON STP

390140 41.1583 -81.5728 OHIO SUMMIT 12OHDO

CUVA0077 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

N. FK. YELLOW CRK AT GHENT - UPST YELLOW CRK RD.

F01P21 41.1592 -81.6383 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; NORTH FORK YELLOW CREEK ABOVE YELLOW CREEK ROAD AT GHENT RMI=1187.93/37.16/4.64/0.10 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

CUVA0078 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

AKRON STP INFLUENT

390113 41.1597 -81.5664 OHIO 12OHDO

CUVA0079 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

AKRON STP EFFLUENT

390114 41.1597 -81.5664 OHIO 12OHDO

Page 181: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-19

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0080 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK W OF BOTZUM - YELLOW CREEK RD.

F01A45 41.16 -81.6 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED 1.2 MILES WEST OF BOTZUM, AT THE YELLOW CREEK RD. BRIDGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0081 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

N. FK. YELLOW CREEK NR GHENT - DST UNNAMED TRIB

F01P22 41.1617 -81.6381 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; NORTH FORK YELLOW CREEK BELOW CONFLUENCE WITH UNNAMED TRIB NORTH OF GHENT RMI=1187.93/37.16/4.64/0.30 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

CUVA0082 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA RIVER AT BATH RD. AKRON

390139 41.1622 -81.5742 OHIO SUMMIT 12OHDO

CUVA0083 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT BOTZUM - BATH RD.

F01S15 41.1622 -81.5744 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT BOTZUM, IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM FROM THE AKRON WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 182: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-20

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0084 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK NR BOTZUM - RIVERVIEW RD.

F01P15 41.1633 -81.5761 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; YELLOW CREEK AT RIVERVIEW ROAD NEAR BOTZUM RMI=1187.93/37.16/0.14 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/23/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0085 Tributaries 5010 Yellow Creek

YELLOW CREEK

CUVA_YECR

41.1634 -81.5763 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON YELLOW CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0086 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT BOTZUM OH

411011081345100

41.1697 -81.5808 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0087 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

IRA CREEK CUVA_IRCR

41.1811 -81.5842 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON IRA CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0088 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT IRA OH

04206250 41.1814 -81.5833 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 183: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-21

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0089 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. DST AKRON WWTP - IRA RD.

502190 41.1814 -81.5839 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MEASURES IMMEDIATE IMPACT OF AKRON S.T.P. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; AT IRA ROAD BRIDGE ABOUT 2 MILES NORTH OF AKRON S.T.P. IRA ROAD INTERSECTS AKRON-PENINSULA RD. AND RIVERVIEW RD. COLLECTION - GRAB SAMPLES BY AKRON WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAB.

21OHIO

CUVA0090 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

IRA ROAD BRIDGE

CUVA_IRRO

41.1815 -81.5836 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED AT THE IRA ROAD BRIDGE CROSSING OVER THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0091 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MUD BROOK JUST UPSTREAM OF WYOGA LAKE

F01W21 41.1881 -81.4851 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION. LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; MUD BROOK APPROX. 50 FEET UPSTREAM OF WYOGA LAKE SOUTH OF HUDSON AND NORTH OF CUYAHOGA FALLS COLLECTION - 1984 SURVEY BY WQ MODELING.

21OHIO

Page 184: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-22

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0092 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook TRIB TO POWERS BROOK DST MORGAN ADHESIVES CO.

F01S65 41.1942 -81.4458 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF THE MORGAN ADHESIVES CO. ON POWERS BROOK. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE FIRST BRIDGE DOWNSTREAM FROM THE 002 OUTFALL, 0.17 MILES UPSTREAM FROM MEADOWBROOK LAKE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0093 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook POWERS BK AB MEADOWBROOK LK (I-1) NR STOW OH

411200081262800

41.2 -81.4411 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0094 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R BL AKRON OH

04206300 41.2008 -81.5686 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0095 Tributaries 5009 Furnace Run

FURNACE RUN CUVA_FURU

41.2013 -81.5742 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON FURNACE RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0096 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MEADOWBROOK LK AB DAM (L-1) NR STOW OH

411205081271300

41.2014 -81.4536 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0097 Tributaries 5009 Furnace Run

FURNACE RN AT EVERETT OH

411205081342400

41.2014 -81.5733 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 185: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-23

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0098 Tributaries 5009 Furnace Run

FURNACE RUN NR EVERETT - RIVERVIEW RD.

F01P14 41.2014 -81.5736 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; FURNACE RUN AT RIVERVIEW ROAD NEAR EVERETT RMI=1187.93/33.08/0.27 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/23/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0099 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. DST AKRON WWTP - BOLANZ RD (RM 33.2)

502010 41.2019 -81.5686 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - MEASURES THE INFLUENCE THE AKRON STP HAS ON THE CUYAHOGA R. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; ON BOLANZ RD. BRIDGE; SITE CAN BE REACHED BY TAKING PORTAGE TRAIL WEST OFF ROUTE 8 TO AKRON-PENINSULA RD., FOLLOW AKRON-PENINSULA RD. NORTH, BOLANZ RD. IS THE 2ND ROAD ON THE LEFT AFTER AKRON'S STP.

21OHIO

CUVA0100 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook POWERS BROOK AT HUDSON DR. (RM 1.37)

F01S48 41.2022 -81.455 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE HUDSON DRIVE BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM THE HUDSON #6 WWTP; JUST WEST OF MEADOWBROOK LAKE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 186: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-24

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0101 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MUD BROOK AT STOW - SEASONS RD.

F01P25 41.2028 -81.4733 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; MUD BROOK AT SEASONS ROAD IN STOW RMI=1187.93/39.78/8.34 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/24/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0102 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

ROBINSON RN AT EVERETT OH

411230081333700

41.2083 -81.5603 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0103 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

ROBINSON RUN

CUVA_RORU

41.2083 -81.5603 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON ROBINSON RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0104 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

LANGES RN AT EVERETT OH

411241081332200

41.2114 -81.5561 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0105 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

LANGES RUN CUVA_LARU

41.2115 -81.556 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON LANGES RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

Page 187: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-25

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0106 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

POWERS BR DST HUDSON #6 WWTP- SOD FARM RD RM=0.3

F01S46 41.2139 -81.4661 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE SOD FARM ROAD BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE HUDSON #6 WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0107 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

RAILROAD CREEK

CUVA_RACR

41.2173 -81.5622 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON RAILROAD CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0108 Tributaries 5011 Mud Brook MUD BROOK UPST POWERS BROOK - BARLOW RD RM=9.44

F01S45 41.2175 -81.4711 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BARLOW RD. BRIDGE, 3.7 MILES NORTH OF CUYAHOGA FALLS; UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF POWERS BROOK. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 188: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-26

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0109 Tributaries 5008 Dickerson Run

DICKERSON RUN

CUVA_DIRU

41.2179 -81.552 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON DICKERSON RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0110 Tributaries 5008 Dickerson Run

DICKERSON RN AT PENINSULA OH

411306081330700

41.2183 -81.5519 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0111 Tributaries 5007 Salt Run SALT RN AT PENINSULA OH

411311081320400

41.2197 -81.5344 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0112 Tributaries 5007 Salt Run SALT RUN CUVA_SARU

41.226 -81.547 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON SALT RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0113 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

OAK HILL CUVA_OAHI

41.226 -81.5581 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON AN INTERMITTENT STREAM THAT COMES OUT OF THE OAK HILL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. IT IS A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0114 Tributaries 5016 Haskell Run HASKELL RUN CUVA_HARU

41.2287 -81.5083 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON HASKELL RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

Page 189: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-27

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0115 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R NR PENINSULA OH

411359081330400

41.2331 -81.5511 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0116 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

RITCHIE RUN CUVA_RIRU

41.2344 -81.5472 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON RITCHIE RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0117 Tributaries 5016 Haskell Run HASKELL RN AT PENINSULA OH

411404081324900

41.2344 -81.5469 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0118 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

PENINSULA CREEK

CUVA_PECR

41.2387 -81.5504 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON AN INTERMITTENT STREAM THAT IS A TRIBUTARY OF SLIPPERY RUN. SLIPPERY RUN IS A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141. RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0119 Tributaries 5009 Furnace Run

FURNACE RN AT RICHFIELD OH

411425081365100

41.2403 -81.6142 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0120 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

STATE ROUTE 303 BRIDGE

CUVA_SR_303

41.2411 -81.5502 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED AT THE STATE ROUTE 303 BRIDGE CROSSING OVER THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0121 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT PENINSULA OH

04206400 41.2414 -81.55 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 190: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-28

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0122 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT PENINSULA - S.R. 303 (RM 29.08)

F01S14 41.2414 -81.55 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE ST. RT. 303 BRIDGE AT PENINSULA. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0123 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

SLIPPER RN AT PENINSULA OH

411431081334400

41.2419 -81.5614 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0124 Tributaries 5006 Boston Run BOSTON RN AT PENINSULA OH

411441081324500

41.2447 -81.5458 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0125 Tributaries 5006 Boston Run BOSTON RUN CUVA_BORU

41.2454 -81.5446 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON BOSTON RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0126 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CR 0.05 MI UPSTREAM OF HUDSON WWTP

F01W09 41.2559 -81.473 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK APPROX. 0.05 MI UPSTREAM OF THE HUDSON WWTP OUTFALL, NORTH OF TOWN 0.04 MI DOWNSTREAM OF THE OHIO TURNPIKE. COLLECTION - 1984 SURVEY BY DIV. WQMA INCLUDED TOT, XS, Q, GRAB SAMPLES,

21OHIO

Page 191: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-29

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0127 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CRK NR HUDSON - HINES HILL RD RM=7.02

F01W11 41.2602 -81.4891 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK AT HINES HILL ROAD JUST NORTH OF HUDSON AND THE OHIO TURNPIKE, IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE WALTERS ROAD INTERSECTION, APPROX. 0.93 MI DOWNSTREAM OF THE HUDSON WWTP. COLLECTION - 1984 SURVEY BY DIV. WQMA INCLUDES TOT, XS, Q, GRAB SAMPLES,

21OHIO

CUVA0128 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT BOSTON MILLS RD.

F01A58 41.2628 -81.5603 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE SURVEY OF THE LOWER CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED AT THE BOSTON MILLS RD. BRIDGE, AT BOSTON MILLS, JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM I-271. COLLECTED BY THE OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0129 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

BOSTON MILLS ROAD BRIDGE

CUVA_BOMI

41.263 -81.5601 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED AT THE BOSTON MILLS ROAD BRIDGE CROSSING OVER THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

Page 192: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-30

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0130 Tributaries 5015 Spring Creek

SPRING CUVA_SPCR

41.2656 -81.5641 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON SPRING CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0130a

Tributaries 5015 Spring Creek

Upper Spring Creek, NPS monitoring site

41.255908

-81.577686 OHIO 11NPSWRD

CUVA0131 Tributaries 5015 Spring Creek

SPRING RN NR PENINSULA OH

411557081335100

41.2658 -81.5658 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0132 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

COLUMBIA RUN

CUVA_CORU

41.2748 -81.5687 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON COLUMBIA RUN - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0133 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK AT BRANDYWINE RD. (RM 1.95)

F01W16 41.2765 -81.5382 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK AT BRANDYWINE ROAD, JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH I-271 AND STANFORD ROAD, SOUTHWEST OF MACEDONIA AND NORTHEAST OF BOSTON, APPROX. 1.98 MI DOWNSTREAM OF THE MACEDONIA WWTP

21OHIO

CUVA0134 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE C AT BOSTON HEIGHTS OH

411636081321800

41.2767 -81.5383 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 193: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-31

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0135 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK AT SOLON - PETTIBONE RD.

F01P38 41.2819 -81.4711 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY; TINKERS CREEK AT PETTIBONE ROAD IN SOLON RMI=1187.93/16.36/11.24 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/28/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0136 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK AT TWINSBURG RD S OF MACEDONIA

F01W12 41.2831 -81.5048 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION. LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK AT TWINSBURG ROAD APPROX. 1 MI SOUTH OF MACEDONIA, JUST EAST OF S.R. 8, 2.79 MI DOWNSTREAM OF THE HUDSON WWTP AND 1.23 MI UPSTREAM OF THE MACEDONIA WWTP. COLLECTION - 1984 SURVEY BY DIV. WQMA INCLUDED TOT, XS, Q, GRAB SAMPLES,

21OHIO

CUVA0137 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK NR MOUTH - TECUMSEH DR.

502040 41.2856 -81.5628 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - 303 PROGRAM; MEASURES WATER QUALITY OF BRANDYWINE CRK. NEAR ITS MOUTH, ALSO TO MAKE CALCULATIONS ON THE LOADS CONTRIBUTED TO THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - ON WEST SIDE OF DRIVEWAY TO THE JAITE BOX CO., WHICH IS OFF HIGHLAND RD JUST EAST OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER.

21OHIO

Page 194: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-32

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0138 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK

CUVA_BRCR

41.2857 -81.5624 OHIO SUMMIT STATION IS LOCATED ON BRANDYWINE CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0139 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK UPST TECUMSEH DR. (RM 0.26)

F01S49 41.2858 -81.5606 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - SUMMIT CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE TECUMSEH CORP. OUTFALL; UPSTREAM FROM TECUMSEH DRIVE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0140 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE C NR JAITE OH

04206420 41.2858 -81.5622 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0141 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT JAITE - VAUGHN RD. (RM 24.10)

F01S13 41.2872 -81.5653 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - SUMMIT/CUYAHOGA CO. BORDER; LOCATED JUST EAST OF JAITE AT THE VAUGHN RD. (HIGHLAND RD.) BRIDGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 195: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-33

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0142 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

INDIAN CREEK AT MOUTH - MACEDONIA

F01W15 41.294 -81.5195 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; INDIAN CREEK AT ITS MOUTH, JUST ABOVE THE CONFLUENCE WITH BRANDYWINE CREEK NEAR MACEDONIA. INDIAN CREEK IS 0.36 MI DOWNSTREAM OF S.R. 8, 0.04 MI DOWNSTREAM OF THE MACEDONIA WWTP AND 0.07 MI UPSTREAM OF HIGHLAND ROAD.

21OHIO

CUVA0143 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK NR NORTHFIELD CENTER - S.R. 8

F01P35 41.2942 -81.5122 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK AT SR 8 NEAR NORTHFIELD CENTER RMI=1187.93/24.16/4.27 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/28/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0144 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CREEK AT AKRON-CLEVELAND RD. (RM 3.7)

F01P36 41.2942 -81.5231 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK AT AKRON-CLEVELAND ROAD NEAR NORTHFIELD CENTER RMI=1187.93/24.16/3.70 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

Page 196: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-34

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0145 Tributaries 5005 Brandywine Creek

BRANDYWINE CR JUST UPSTREAM OF MACEDONIA WWTP

F01W13 41.2943 -81.5185 OHIO SUMMIT PURPOSE - OHIO EPA WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION LOCATION - SUMMIT COUNTY; BRANDYWINE CREEK APPROX. 100 FEET UPSTREAM OF THE MACEDONIA WWTP OUTFALL, SOUTH OF TOWN 0.06 MI UPSTREAM OF INDIAN RUN AND 0.3 MI DOWNSTREAM OF S.R. 8 COLLECTION - 1984 SURVEY BY DIV. WQMA INCLUDED TOT, XS, Q, GRAB SAMPLES,

21OHIO

CUVA0146 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT JAITE OH

411747081341300

41.2964 -81.5703 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

CUVA0147 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

CENTRAL MAINTENANCE AREA CREEK

CUVA_CMAC

41.3071 -81.5858 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON THE CREEK THAT RUNS THROUGH THE CENTRAL MAINTENANCE AREA. IT IS A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141. RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0148 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

TRIB TO CUYAHOGA R AT SAGAMORE HILLS - CRAN. TR.

F01A37 41.3125 -81.5481 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED BEHIND 211 CRANBERRY TRAIL, WEST OF NORTHFIELD CENTER, NEAR BOYDEN RD. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0149 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R NR BRECKSVILLE OH

411901081350700

41.3169 -81.5853 OHIO SUMMIT 112WRD

Page 197: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-35

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0150 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA CREEK AT BRECKSVILLE - RIVERVIEW RD.

F01P13 41.3169 -81.5922 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY; CHIPPEWA CR AT RIVERVIEW ROAD IN BRECKSVILLE RMI=1187.93/20.88/0.36 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/23/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0151 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA CREEK

CUVA_CHCR

41.3171 -81.5921 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON CHIPPEWA CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0152 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA C AT RIVERVIEW ROAD NR BRECKSVILLE OH

04206450 41.3172 -81.5922 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0153 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

STONE ROAD CUVA_STRO

41.3191 -81.5886 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON THE UNNAMED INTERMITTENT STREAM THAT RUNS ALONGSIDE STONE ROAD. IT IS A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0154 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA C AT BRECKSVILLE OH

411913081371900

41.3203 -81.6219 OHIO GALLIA 112WRD

Page 198: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-36

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0155 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA CREEK DST BROADVIEW HEIGHTS LANDFILL

F01S58 41.3228 -81.6444 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - COMPLIANCE SAMPLING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE HARRIS RD. BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BROADVIEW HEIGHTS LANDFILL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0156 Tributaries 5004 Chippewa Creek

CHIPPEWA CREEK UPST BROADVIEW HEIGHTS LANDFILL

F01S59 41.3244 -81.6722 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - COMPLIANCE SAMPLING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE AVERY RD. BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM THE BROADVIEW HEIGHTS LANDFILL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0157 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

CLEVELAND DIV OF WATER

039 41.3333 -81.6 OHIO CUYAHOGA

NATL.ORGANICS RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY OFF.OF RESEARCH & DEVEL.CINN,OHIO DIVISION FILTRATION PLANT

111WS

CUVA0158 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

UNAMED TR TO CUYAHOGA R AT INDEPENDENCE OH

412105081353200

41.3514 -81.5922 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

Page 199: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-37

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0159 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

SAGAMORE CREEK

CUVA_SACR

41.3514 -81.5925 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON SAGAMORE CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0160 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

UNAMED TR TO CUYAHOGA R NR NORTHFIELD OH

412118081334300

41.355 -81.5619 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0161 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R NR INDEPENDENCE OH

412124081355200

41.3567 -81.5978 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0162 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT FITZWATER RD. (RM 17.30)

F01S12 41.3567 -81.5981 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE FITZWATER RD. BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BRECKSVILLE WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0163 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

BROOKSIDE ROAD

CUVA_BRRO

41.3601 -81.6117 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON THE UNNAMED INTERMITTENT STREAM THAT RUNS ALONGSIDE BROOKSIDE ROAD. IT IS A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141. RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

Page 200: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-38

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0164 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK

CUVA_TICR

41.3645 -81.6087 OHIO CUYAHOGA

STATION IS LOCATED ON TINKERS CREEK - A TRIBUTARY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0165 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK 0.4 MI. DST OF IOOF CAMP BRIDGE

F01W58 41.3647 -81.4764 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION - TINKERS CREEK AT IOOF CAMP, 0.4 MI. DST. OF BRIDGE (ENTRANCE TO CAMP) AND MOUTH OF BEAVER MEADOW RUN, UPST. OF LARGE POWERLINE CROSS- ING, SW. OF SOLON, CUYAHOGA CO. COLLECTION - 1991 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA

21OHIO

CUVA0166 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK AT MOUTH - CANAL RD.

F01S24 41.3647 -81.6092 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE CANAL RD. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE WITH THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0167 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS C NR INDEPENDENCE OH

04207300 41.365 -81.6089 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

Page 201: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-39

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0168 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

SE BR. DEER LICK RUN JUST UPST BEDFORD ANODIZING

F01A09 41.3714 -81.5317 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SPECIAL SHORT-TERM MONITORING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD ANODIZING 001 OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0169 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

SE BR. DEER LICK RUN JUST DST BEDFORD ANODIZING

F01A08 41.3717 -81.5319 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SPECIAL SHORT-TERM MONITORING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD ANODIZING 001 OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

CUVA0170 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

S. BR. DEER LICK RUN NR WALTON HILLS - PARK DR.

F01A06 41.3717 -81.5494 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SPECIAL SHORT-TERM MONITORING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE METROPARK DRIVE BRIDGE, ON THE SOUTH EDGE OF BEDFORD RESERVATION; 0.7 MILES WEST OF AN INDUSTRIAL PARK. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

Page 202: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-40

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0171 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

E BR DEERLICK CREEK UPST HUKILL CO. OUTFALL

F01S64 41.3736 -81.5294 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE WATER QUALITY OF THE STREAM WHICH THE HUKILL CO. DISCHARGES TO. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE HUKILL CO. 001 OUTFALL; SOUTH OF BEDFORD. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0172 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK NEAR WALTON HILLS - DUNHAM RD.

F01P37 41.3736 -81.5797 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY; TINKERS CREEK AT DUNHAM ROAD NEAR WALTON HILLS RMI=1187.93/16.36/2.18 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 01/28/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0173 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS C AT DUNHAM RD NR INDEPENDENCE OH

412226081344500

41.3739 -81.5792 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0174 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

E BR DEERLICK RUN JUST DST HUKILL CO.

F01S62 41.3744 -81.5308 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE WATER QUALITY OF THE STREAM WHICH THE HUKILL CO. DISCHARGES TO. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM THE HUKILL CO. 001 OUTFALL; UPSTREAM FROM THE S.K. WELLMAN CO. LAKE; SOUTH OF BEDFORD. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 203: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-41

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0175 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

SE BRANCH DEERLICK RUN AT WALTON RD.

F01S80 41.3744 -81.5417 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - FOLLOW-UP TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER INTENSIVE SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE WALTON RD. BRIDGE, JUST SOUTH OF THE EGBERT RD. BRIDGE; SOUTH OF THE BEDFORD RESERVATION. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0176 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK ADJ BUTTON RD. (RM 2.5)

F01S25 41.3744 -81.5756 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED ADJACENT TO BUTTON RD., UPSTREAM FROM DUNHAM RD., NEAR WALTON HILLS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0177 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

SE BR. DEER LICK RUN NR WALTON HILLS - EGBERT RD

F01A07 41.3747 -81.5425 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SPECIAL SHORT-TERM MONITORING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE EGBERT RD. BRIDGE AT THE MOUTH, JUST NORTHEAST OF WALTON HILLS; 0.3 MILES WEST OF BEDFORD CITY LIMITS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

Page 204: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-42

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0178 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

E BR DEERLICK RUN DST HUKILL CO. - EGBERT RD.

F01S60 41.3756 -81.5408 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE WATER QUALITY OF THE STREAM WHICH THE HUKILL CO. DISCHARGES TO. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE EGBERT RD. BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE HUKILL CO.; JUST SOUTH OF THE METROPARK GOLF COURSE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0179 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CRK UPST BEDFORD HTS WWTP - RICHMOND RD.

F01S27 41.3758 -81.4972 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED UPSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD HEIGHTS WWTP AT THE RICHMOND RD. BRIDGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0180 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

E BR DEERLICK RUN DST HUKILL CO. - DST LAKE

F01S61 41.3758 -81.5364 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE WATER QUALITY OF THE STREAM WHICH THE HUKILL CO. DISCHARGES TO. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM THE S.K. WELLMAN CO. LAKE, UPSTREAM FROM EGBERT RD.; JUST SOUTH OF BEDFORD. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 205: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-43

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0181 Tributaries 5003 Deer Lick Run

DEER LICK RUN IN BEDFORD RES. - PARK DR RM=0.76

F01S39 41.3761 -81.5456 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED IN THE BED*FORD RESERVATION AT THE PARK DRIVE BRIDGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0182 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK AT GLEN WILLOW - DST RICHMOND RD.

502090 41.3767 -81.49 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - 303 PROGRAM; MEASURES THE WATER QUALITY OF THE UPPER REACHES OF TINKERS CREEK. LOCATION - .1 MI. DOWNSTREAM FROM RICHMOND ROAD BRIDGE NEAR GLENWILLOW. COLLECTION - SAMPLES WILL BE SPACE COMPOSITED AND COLLECTED BY WADING; BY ECO LABS INC. SAMPLE ANALYZED BY ECO LABS.

21OHIO

CUVA0183 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

TRIB TO E. BR. DEER LICK RUN DST AM. STEEL DRUM

F01A11 41.3767 -81.5328 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SPECIAL SHORT-TERM MONITORING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED DOWNSTREAM FROM THE AMERICAN STEEL DRUM COMPANY OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171. SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE OHIO EPA

21OHIO

Page 206: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-44

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0184 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

WOOD CREEK DST BEDFORD WWTP (RM 0.15)

F01S36 41.3775 -81.575 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED NEAR THE MOUTH, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0185 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK JUST UPST CONFL DEERLICK RUN

F01S77 41.3783 -81.5556 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF DEERLICK RUN; IN BEDFORD RESERVATION. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0186 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK JUST DST CONFL DEERLICK RUN

F01S76 41.3783 -81.5567 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF DEERLICK RUN; IN BEDFORD RESERVATION. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 207: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-45

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0187 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT HILLSIDE RD.

F01S11 41.3789 -81.6147 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE HILLSIDE RD. BRIDGE, 1.0 MILES NORTHWEST OF VALLEY VIEW. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0188 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

HAWTHORNE CREEK AT RICHMOND ROAD BRIDGE

F01W57 41.3836 -81.4889 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION - HAWTHORNE CREEK, UPST. OF BEDFORD HEIGHTS WWTP, AT RICHMOND RD. BRIDGE, CUYAHOGA CO. COLLECTION - 1991 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA USGS QUAD = CHAGRIN FALLS

21OHIO

CUVA0189 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK DST BEDFORD HTS. WWTP - DST I-271

F01S26 41.3839 -81.5111 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM I-271, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD HEIGHTS WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0190 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

MAPLE HEIGHTS STP EFFLUENT

390514 41.3839 -81.5833 OHIO 12OHDO

Page 208: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-46

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0191 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

HAWTHORNE CREEK JUST UPST BEDFORD HTS. WWTP

F01P55 41.3844 -81.4906 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY HAWTHORN CREEK AB BEDFORD HTS STP S OF CITY RMI=1187.93/16.36/7.83/0.15 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 03/25/80/WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0192 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS C AT BEDFORD OH

04207200 41.3844 -81.5275 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0193 Tributaries 5002 Tinkers Creek

TINKERS CREEK AT BEDFORD - S.R. 14 (RM 6.32)

502220, P0805

41.3844 -81.5275 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - PWQMN STATION - TO MONITOR DOWNSTREAM OF MAJOR DISCHARGERS. (PRIMARILY BEDFORD HEIGHTS AND SOLON) LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; ON LEFT BANK ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF BRIDGE ON STATE HIGHWAY 14 IN BEDFORD. RIVER MILE = 6.32

21OHIO

CUVA0194 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

HAWTHORNE CREEK JUST DST BEDFORD HTS. WWTP

F01P54 41.3847 -81.4914 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY HAWTHORN CREEK BL BEDFORD HTS STP S OF CITY RMI=1187.93/16.36/7.83/0.10 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE WATER USE DESIGNATION AS OF 03/25/80-WWH

21OHIO

CUVA0195 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

MAPLE HEIGHTS STP INFLUENT

390513 41.3853 -81.5833 OHIO 12OHDO

Page 209: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-47

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0196 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

WOOD CREEK DST BEDFORD WWTP (RM 1.20)

F01S37 41.3858 -81.5636 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD WWTP OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0197 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

WOOD CREEK UPST BEDFORD WWTP (RM 1.45)

F01S38 41.3881 -81.5606 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AND ITS MAJOR TRIBUTARIES. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE BEDFORD WWTP OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0198 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CA AT INDEPENDENCE OH

04207500 41.3903 -81.625 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0199 ROCKSIDE ROAD BRIDGE

CUVA_RORO

41.3944 -81.6295 OHIO CUYAHOGA

duplicate of CUVA0203; STATION IS LOCATED AT THE ROCKSIDE ROAD BRIDGE CROSSING OVER THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. STATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA - 15610 VAUGHN ROAD - BRECKSVILLE OHIO 44141.

11NPSWRD

CUVA0200 ROCKSIDE ROAD BRIDGE

701812 41.3944 -81.6294 OHIO CUYAHOGA

duplicate of CUVA0203 21OHCLEV

Page 210: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-48

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0201 CUYAHOGA R. AT INDEPENDENCE,OHIO

393305 41.395 -81.6292 OHIO CUYAHOGA

duplicate of CUVA0202; PURPOSE- MEASURE IN-STREAM WATER QUALITY TO DEVELOP MATERIAL LOADINGS TO LAKE ERIE FOR THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAKE ERIE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY. LOCATION- CUYAHOGA COUNTY,13.5 MILES UPSTREAM FROM THE MOUTH OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER AT THE USGS GAGING STATION ON THE RIGHT

11COEBUF

CUVA0202 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R AT INDEPENDENCE OH

04208000 41.3953 -81.63 OHIO CUYAHOGA

112WRD

CUVA0203 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT INDEPENDENCE - OLD ROCKSIDE RD.

502020, P0801

41.3953 -81.63 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - PWQMN STATION AND IJC LAKE ERIE TRIB. STATION. TO MONITOR DOWNSTREAM OF MAJOR TRIB. CONFLUENCE. (TINKERS CRK.) LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; BRIDGE ON OLD ROCKSIDE RD.; 0.8 MI. NORTHEAST OF INDEPENDENCE AND 3 MI. DOWNSTREAM FROM TINKERS CRK. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA-NORTHEAST DISTRICT - 216-425-9171

21OHIO

CUVA0204 CUYAHOGA RIVER AT INDEPENDENCE OHIO

USGS04208000

41.3953 -81.63 OHIO CUYAHOGA

duplicate of CUVA0202 31HEIDRV

Page 211: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-49

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0205 Tributaries 5001 Mill Creek TRIB TO MILL CRK JUST UPST AL. SMELT. & REF. CO.

F01S56 41.4133 -81.5706 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF THE ALUMINUM SMELTING AND REFINING CO. ON AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY AND MILL CREEK. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE ALUMINUM SMELTING AND REFINING CO. OUTFALL; IN MAPLE HEIGHTS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0206 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

UNNAMED TRIB TO CUYAHOGA R NR CLEVLND- SCHAAF RD

F01P11 41.4136 -81.6475 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY; UNNAMED TRIB TO CUYAHOGA RIVER AT SCHAAF ROAD IN INDEPENDENCE NR CLEVELAND RMI=1187.93/11.05/0.25 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

CUVA0207 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

TRIB TO MILL CRK JUST DST AL. SMELT. & REF. CO.

F01S55 41.4139 -81.5714 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT OF THE ALUMINUM SMELTING AND REFINING CO. ON AN UNNAMED TRIBUTARY AND MILL CREEK. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM THE ALUMINUM SMELTING AND REFINING CO. OUTFALL; IN MAPLE HEIGHTS. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0208 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA RIVER

380011 41.4142 -81.6381 OHIO CUYAHOGA

GRANGER RD. BETWEEN WARNER RD. AND CLOVERLEAF OF ROUTE 21, CLEVELAND

1115E050

Page 212: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-50

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0209 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST CONFL MILL CREEK - GRANGER RD.

F01A26 41.4142 -81.6381 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE GRANGER RD. BRIDGE, JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CONFLUENCE OF MILL CREEK. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0210 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

UNNAMED TRIB TO CUYAHOGA R NR CLEVELAND - SR 17

F01P10 41.4147 -81.6478 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE-OHIO EPA SPECIAL &/OR SHORT TERM SURVEYS LOCATION-CUYAHOGA COUNTY; UNNAMED TRIB TO CUYAHOGA RIVER AT SR 17 IN INDEPENDENCE NEAR CLEVELAND RMI=1187.93/11.05/0.19 COLLECTION-OHIO EPA NORTHEAST DIST OFFICE

21OHIO

CUVA0211 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST. S.R. 21/RR BRIDGE (RM 11.4)

F01S71 41.4172 -81.6408 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - FOLLOW UP SAMPLING TO THE 1984 CUYAHOGA RIVER SURVEY. THIS SITE CONTAINS SEDIMENT DATA. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST USTREAM FROM THE ST. RT. 21/ RAILROAD BRIDGE, UPSTREAM FROM THE CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 213: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-51

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0212 Tributaries 5013 Ohio Canal OHIO CANAL AT MILL CREEK AQUADUCT RM= 8.41/2.80

F01W52 41.4175 -81.6383 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION -OHIO CANAL AT MILL CREEK AQUADUCT. SITE IS LOCATED 2.80 RM US OF FINAL CONFLUENCE OF CANAL AND CUYAHOGA RIVER. OTHER OUTLETS FROM CANAL TO CUYAHOGA THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH. CANAL STARTS AT RM 8.41 ON CUYAHOGA AT FLOW DIVERSION.

21OHIO

CUVA0213 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. AT R.R. BRIDGE-RT.21

390138 41.4175 -81.6417 OHIO CUYAHOGA

12OHDO

CUVA0214 Tributaries 5001 Mill Creek MILL CREEK AT GARFIELD HTS. - CANAL RD.

502110 41.4178 -81.6383 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - 303 PROGRAM; MEASURES WATER QUALITY OF MILL CRK. NEAR ITS MOUTH, DATA WILL BE USED TO CALCULATE LOADINGS CONTRIBUTED TO THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; JUST UPSTREAM FROM CANAL RD. BRIDGE NEAR GARFIELD HEIGHTS.

21OHIO

CUVA0215 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R UPST SOUTHERLY WWTP- RR/SR 21 RM=11.3

F01S10 41.4178 -81.6417 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE RAILROAD BRIDGE AT ST. RT. 21, UPSTREAM FROM THE CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 214: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-52

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0216 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. AT SOUTHERLY STP

390137 41.4186 -81.65 OHIO CUYAHOGA

12OHDO

CUVA0217 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. DST SOUTHERLY WWTP - MIXING ZONE

F01A57 41.4197 -81.655 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE SURVEY OF THE LOWER CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED IN THE MIXING ZONE OF CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP. COLLECTED BY THE OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0218 Tributaries 5001 Mill Creek MILL CREEK AT GARFIELD HTS. - UPST TRIB

F01A62 41.4208 -81.6356 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SPECIAL SAMPLING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED JUST UPSTREAM FROM A SMALL TRIBUTARY, 0.41 MILES UPSTREAM FROM THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. COLLECTED BY THE OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0219 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

NEORSD SOUTHERLY WWTP EFFL. CHANNEL DS OUTFALL

F01W49 41.4208 -81.6536 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE -OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION -SOUTHERLY WWTP EFFLUENT CHANNEL WHICH FLOWS INTO CUYAHOGA RIVER AT RIVER MILE 10.57. 528 FT US FROM CONFLUENCE IS THE SITE LOCATION AT RM 0.1 IN THE CHANNEL. COLLECTION-1990 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA.

21OHIO

Page 215: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-53

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0220 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. M.P. 10.7, BELOW STP

390136 41.4214 -81.6431 OHIO CUYAHOGA

12OHDO

CUVA0221 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

NEORSD SOUTHERLY WWTP EFFL. CHANNEL AT OUTFALL

F01W48 41.4219 -81.6514 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION - SOUTHERLY WWTP EFFLUENT CHANNEL AT OUTFALL. THE CHANNEL FLOWS INTO CUYAHOGA RIVER AT RM 10.57. SITE LOCATED AT RM 0.2 IN CHANNEL, 1048 FEET UPST. OF CONFLUENCE. COLLECTION - 1990 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA

21OHIO

CUVA0222 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

OHIO CANAL AT OVERFLOW TO NEORSD WWTP 8.41/1.98

F01W53 41.4219 -81.6519 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - OHIO EPA INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY LOCATION -OHIO CANAL AT OVERFLOW TO SOUTHERLY WWTP. SITE IS LOCATED 1.98 RM UP STREAM OF FINAL CONFLUENCE OF CANAL AND CUYAHOGA R. (8.41). COLLECTION - 1990 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY WQ MODELING SECTION OF DWQPA USGS QUAD =CLEVELAND SOUTH QUADRANGLE

21OHIO

Page 216: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-54

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0223 Tributaries 5001 Mill Creek TRIB. TO MILL CREEK AT GARFIELD HTS. - WARNER RD

F01A63 41.4225 -81.6336 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - SHORT-TERM SPECIAL SAMPLING. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE WARNER RD. BRIDGE, AT GARFIELD HEIGHTS, NEAR THE CONFLUENCE WITH MILL CREEK. COLLECTED BY THE OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST DISTRICT OFFICE, (216) 425-9171.

21OHIO

CUVA0224 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. DST SOUTHERLY WWTP - CONRAIL RR

F01S09 41.4269 -81.6658 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE CONRAIL RAILROAD BRIDGE, DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0225 Point Sources

100000 WWTP outfall

CUYAHOGA R. DST CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP RM=9.5

F01A24 41.4278 -81.6686 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP, 0.2 MILES DOWNSTREAM FROM THE PENN. CENTRAL BRIDGE. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

Page 217: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-55

NPS StationID1

Waterbody Code2

Stream Code3

Waterbody Name4 Station Location5

Other Names6

Latitude DD5,7

Longitude DD5,7 State5 County5 Description5

STORET Agency Code5

CUVA0226 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

CUYAHOGA R. UPST CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP

F01A25 41.4306 -81.6478 OHIO CUYAHOGA

PURPOSE - INTENSIVE BIOLOGICAL AND WATER QUALITY SURVEY OF THE CUYAHOGA RIVER. LOCATION - CUYAHOGA CO.; LOCATED AT THE RAILROAD BRIDGE JUST UPSTREAM FROM THE CLEVELAND SOUTHERLY WWTP OUTFALL. COLLECTION - OHIO EPA, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING, NORTHEAST

21OHIO

CUVA0227 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

U.S. STEEL #9 WATER INTAKE

301508 41.4358 -81.6639 OHIO U.S.STEEL CORP WATER INTAKE #9 FOR CUYAHOGA WORKS AREA. INTAKE AT M.P. 0.10 ON OHIO CANAL. PURPOSE-IND. PT. SOURCE MONITORING-----TYPE OF SAMPLING-GRAB & COMPOSITE FREQUENCY OF SAMPLING-INFREQUENTLY-----LIFE EXPECTANCY OF DATA-10 YEARS CROSS REFERANCE TO OTHER DATA SOURCES-AGENCY CODE 12OHDO, STATIONS

1115R060

CUVA0228 Point Sources

100001 Industrial outfall

U.S. STEEL #172 OUTFALL

301506 41.4361 -81.6639 OHIO U.S. STEEL CORP. CUYAHOGA WORKS AREA- ROLLING MILL OUTFALL #172 (172-L-CR) AT MILE PT. 8.96

1115R060

CUVA0249 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

Cuyahoga River at Botzum OH

4206200 41.16228 -81.57429 OHIO 112WRD

CUVA0264 Main Stem 5 Cuyahoga River

SU-20 410726081295400

41.12389 -81.49833 OHIO 112WRD

CUVA0266 Tributaries 99999 misc tributary

SU-21 410739081331300

41.1275 -81.55361 OHIO 112WRD

Page 218: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX B: All Available Stations Included in Database (continued)

B-56

NOTES: 1 NPS Station ID code. This code has been assigned by NPS for unique identification of locations. 2 1 = Main Stem; 2 = Tributaries; 3 = Springs. Coded only for those stations included in the analyses of this report. 3 Code added by CPCB to identify stations within the same waterbody or segment. Coded only for those stations included in the analyses of

this report. 1 = Buffalo River; 1000 – 9999 indicate various tributaries; 10000 indicates springs. Springs were not separated by stream code, since they are point source stations (i.e. the sampling station is the only location within that spring).

4 Name of waterbody. Assigned only for those stations included in the analyses of this report, based on best available information. All springs were grouped into one category, since each spring has its own station as a unique identifier.

5 Field provided by STORET and included in the Baseline Report (National Park Service 1995). 6 Aliases by which this station is identified in databases other than STORET or the Baseline Report (National Park Service 1995). 7 In decimal degrees. Projection information was derived from NPS GIS metadata files. Refer to available NPS sources for these files.

Page 219: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

C-1

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis The following is a list of the 250 parameters in the “Data for Analysis” (Figure 1), which were used for the analyses in this report. For more information on the origins and screening of the “Data for Analysis,” see the Data Collection and Handling section of this report. More extensive information regarding these and other parameters is available in the relational database that accompanies this report, the USEPA STORET system, and the Baseline Report for this park service unit (National Park Service 1995). PARM

CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group Code 4 Group Name 5

00010 TEMPERATURE, WATER (DEGREES CENTIGRADE) 16 00011 TEMPERATURE, WATER (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT) 16 00020 TEMPERATURE, AIR (DEGREES CENTIGRADE) 16 00025 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (MM OF HG) 13 Physical 00060 FLOW, STREAM, MEAN DAILY CFS 5 Flow 00061 FLOW, STREAM, INSTANTANEOUS CFS 5 Flow 00064 DEPTH OF STREAM, MEAN (FT) 18 00065 STAGE, STREAM (FEET) 13 Physical 00070 TURBIDITY, (JACKSON CANDLE UNITS) 13 Physical 00076 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN TURB

UNIT) 13 Physical

00077 TRANSPARENCY, SECCHI DISC (INCHES) 13 Physical 00080 COLOR (PLATINUM-COBALT UNITS) 13 Physical 00085 ODOR (THRESHOLD NUMBER AT ROOM

TEMPERATURE) 13 Physical

00094 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE,FIELD (UMHOS/CM @ 25C) 13 Physical 00095 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (UMHOS/CM @ 25C) 13 Physical 00299 OXYGEN ,DISSOLVED, ANALYSIS BY PROBE MG/L 7782447 4 Dissolved Oxygen00300 OXYGEN, DISSOLVED MG/L 7782447 4 Dissolved Oxygen00301 OXYGEN, DISSOLVED, PERCENT OF SATURATION % 7782447 4 Dissolved Oxygen00310 BOD, 5 DAY, 20 DEG C MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 00320 BOD, ULTIMATE 1ST STAGE, 20 DEG C MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 00324 BOD, 20 DAY, 20 DEG C MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 00335 COD, .025N K2CR2O7 MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 00340 COD, .25N K2CR2O7 MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 00400 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 13 Physical 00403 PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU 13 Physical 00405 CARBON DIOXIDE (MG/L AS CO2) 124389 6 General Inorganic00410 ALKALINITY, TOTAL (MG/L AS CACO3) 471341 6 General Inorganic00440 BICARBONATE ION (MG/L AS HCO3) 71523 6 General Inorganic00445 CARBONATE ION (MG/L AS CO3) 3812326 6 General Inorganic00452 CARBONATE,WATER,DISS,INCR TIT, FIELD, AS CO3,

MG/L 3812326 6 General Inorganic

Page 220: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-2

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

00453 BICARBONATE,WATER,DISS,INCR TIT,FIELD,AS HCO3,MG/L

71523 6 General Inorganic

00550 OIL & GREASE (SOXHLET EXTRACTION) TOTAL,REC.,MG/L

7 General Organic

00556 OIL & GREASE (FREON EXTR.-GRAV METH) TOT,REC,MG/L

7 General Organic

00572 BIOMASS, PERIPHYTON (GRAMS PER SQUARE METER)

3 Biological

00573 BIOMASS, PERIPHYTON,DRY WEIGHT TOTAL (G/M2) 3 Biological 00600 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00602 NITROGEN, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00605 NITROGEN, ORGANIC, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00607 NITROGEN, ORGANIC, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00608 NITROGEN, AMMONIA, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00610 NITROGEN, AMMONIA, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00612 AMMONIA, UNIONZED (MG/L AS N) 7664417 9 Nitrogen 00613 NITRITE NITROGEN, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00615 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00618 NITRATE NITROGEN, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00619 AMMONIA, UNIONIZED (CALC FR TEMP-PH-NH4)

(MG/L) 7664417 9 Nitrogen

00620 NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00623 NITROGEN, KJELDAHL, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00624 NITROGEN, KJELDAHL, SUSPENDED (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00625 NITROGEN, KJELDAHL, TOTAL, (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00630 NITRITE PLUS NITRATE, TOTAL 1 DET. (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00631 NITRITE PLUS NITRATE, DISS. 1 DET. (MG/L AS N) 17778880 9 Nitrogen 00650 PHOSPHATE, TOTAL (MG/L AS PO4) 14265442 12 Phosphorous 00660 PHOSPHATE, ORTHO (MG/L AS PO4) 14265442 12 Phosphorous 00665 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 7723140 12 Phosphorous 00666 PHOSPHORUS, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS P) 7723140 12 Phosphorous 00671 PHOSPHORUS, DISSOLVED ORTHOPHOSPHATE

(MG/L AS P) 7723140 12 Phosphorous

00680 CARBON, TOTAL ORGANIC (MG/L AS C) 7440440 7 General Organic 00681 CARBON, DISSOLVED ORGANIC (MG/L AS C) 7440440 7 General Organic 00689 CARBON, SUSPENDED ORGANIC (MG/L AS C) 7440440 7 General Organic 00720 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 57125 6 General Inorganic00900 HARDNESS, TOTAL (MG/L AS CACO3) 471341 6 General Inorganic00902 HARDNESS, NON-CARBONATE (MG/L AS CACO3) 471341 6 General Inorganic00915 CALCIUM, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS CA) 7440702 8 Metals 00916 CALCIUM, TOTAL (MG/L AS CA) 7440702 8 Metals 00925 MAGNESIUM, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS MG) 7439954 8 Metals 00927 MAGNESIUM, TOTAL (MG/L AS MG) 7439954 8 Metals 00929 SODIUM, TOTAL (MG/L AS NA) 7440235 8 Metals 00930 SODIUM, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS NA) 7440235 8 Metals

Page 221: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-3

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

00931 SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO 7440235 8 Metals 00932 SODIUM, PERCENT 7440235 8 Metals 00935 POTASSIUM, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS K) 7440097 8 Metals 00937 POTASSIUM, TOTAL MG/L AS K) 7440097 8 Metals 00940 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 16887006 6 General Inorganic00945 SULFATE, TOTAL (MG/L AS SO4) 14808798 6 General Inorganic00950 FLUORIDE, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS F) 16984488 6 General Inorganic00951 FLUORIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS F) 16984488 6 General Inorganic00955 SILICA, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS SI02) 7631869 6 General Inorganic01000 ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) 7440382 8 Metals 01001 ARSENIC, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS AS) 7440382 8 Metals 01002 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 7440382 8 Metals 01005 BARIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS BA) 7440393 8 Metals 01006 BARIUM, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS BA) 7440393 8 Metals 01007 BARIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS BA) 7440393 8 Metals 01010 BERYLLIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS BE) 7440417 8 Metals 01012 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS BE) 7440417 8 Metals 01025 CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 7440439 8 Metals 01026 CADMIUM, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS CD) 7440439 8 Metals 01027 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 7440439 8 Metals 01030 CHROMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CR) 7440473 8 Metals 01031 CHROMIUM, SUSPEND (UG/L AS CR) 7440473 8 Metals 01032 CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT (UG/L AS CR) 7440473 8 Metals 01034 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 7440473 8 Metals 01035 COBALT, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CO) 7440484 8 Metals 01036 COBALT, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS CO) 7440484 8 Metals 01037 COBALT, TOTAL (UG/L AS CO) 7440484 8 Metals 01040 COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 7440508 8 Metals 01041 COPPER, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS CU) 7440508 8 Metals 01042 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 7440508 8 Metals 01044 IRON, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS FE) 7439896 8 Metals 01045 IRON, TOTAL (UG/L AS FE) 7439896 8 Metals 01046 IRON, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS FE) 7439896 8 Metals 01049 LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 7439921 8 Metals 01050 LEAD, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS PB) 7439921 8 Metals 01051 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7439921 8 Metals 01054 MANGANESE, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS MN) 7439965 8 Metals 01055 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 7439965 8 Metals 01056 MANGANESE, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS MN) 7439965 8 Metals 01059 THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) 7440280 8 Metals 01060 MOLYBDENUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS MO) 7439987 8 Metals 01065 NICKEL, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS NI) 7440020 8 Metals

Page 222: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-4

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

01066 NICKEL, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS NI) 7440020 8 Metals 01067 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 7440020 8 Metals 01075 SILVER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AG) 7440224 8 Metals 01076 SILVER, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS AG) 7440224 8 Metals 01077 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 7440224 8 Metals 01080 STRONTIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SR) 7440246 8 Metals 01082 STRONTIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SR) 7440246 8 Metals 01085 VANADIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS V) 7440622 8 Metals 01087 VANADIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS V) 7440622 8 Metals 01090 ZINC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS ZN) 7440666 8 Metals 01091 ZINC, SUSPENDED (UG/L ZN) 7440666 8 Metals 01092 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 7440666 8 Metals 01097 ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) 7440360 8 Metals 01105 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 7429905 8 Metals 01106 ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) 7429905 8 Metals 01130 LITHIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS LI) 7439932 8 Metals 01145 SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 7782492 8 Metals 01146 SELENIUM, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS SE) 7782492 8 Metals 01147 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 7782492 8 Metals 01501 ALPHA, TOTAL 12587461 14 Radiological 01503 ALPHA, DISSOLVED 12587461 14 Radiological 01505 ALPHA, SUSPENDED 12587461 14 Radiological 03501 BETA, TOTAL 12587472 14 Radiological 03503 BETA, DISSOLVED 12587472 14 Radiological 03505 BETA, SUSPENDED 12587472 14 Radiological 31501 COLIFORM,TOT,MEMBRANE FILTER,IMMED.M-ENDO

MED,35C 2 Bacteriological

31613 FECAL COLIFORM,MEMBR FILTER,M-FC AGAR,44.5C,24HR

2 Bacteriological

31616 FECAL COLIFORM,MEMBR FILTER,M-FC BROTH,44.5 C

2 Bacteriological

31625 FECAL COLIFORM, MF,M-FC, 0.7 UM 2 Bacteriological 31633 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE

#/100ML 2 Bacteriological

31648 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 2 Bacteriological 31673 FECAL STREPTOCOCCI, MBR FILT,KF

AGAR,35C,48HR 2 Bacteriological

31679 FECAL STREPTOCOCCI,MF M-ENTEROCOCCUS AGAR,35C,48H

2 Bacteriological

32730 PHENOLICS, TOTAL, RECOVERABLE (UG/L) 7 General Organic 34336 DIETHYL PHTHALATE TOTWUG/L 84662 7 General Organic 34341 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE TOTWUG/L 131113 7 General Organic 38260 METHYLENE BLUE ACTIVE SUBST. (DETERGENTS,

ETC.) 61734 7 General Organic

38477 LINURON WATER, TOTUG/L 330552 11 Pesticide

Page 223: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-5

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

38537 PROPOXUR WATER, TOTUG/L 114261 11 Pesticide 39023 PHORATE, FLAME IONIZATION, WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 298022 11 Pesticide

39025 SIMAZINE,COULSON CONDUCTIVITY,WATER SAMPLE(UG/L)

122349 11 Pesticide

39033 ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 1912249 11 Pesticide 39053 ALDICARB IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) 116063 11 Pesticide 39055 SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) 122349 11 Pesticide 39086 ALKALINITY,WATER,DISS,INCR TIT,FIELD,AS

CACO3,MG/L 471341 13 Physical

39330 ALDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 309002 11 Pesticide 39340 GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE WATER,UG/L 58899 11 Pesticide 39350 CHLORDANE(TECH MIX & METABS),WHOLE

WATER,UG/L 57749 11 Pesticide

39356 METOLACHLOR(DUAL) IN WHOLE WATER UG/L 51218452 11 Pesticide 39360 DDD IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 72548 11 Pesticide 39365 DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 72559 11 Pesticide 39370 DDT IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 50293 11 Pesticide 39380 DIELDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 60571 11 Pesticide 39390 ENDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 72208 11 Pesticide 39398 ETHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 563122 11 Pesticide 39400 TOXAPHENE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 8001352 11 Pesticide 39410 HEPTACHLOR IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 76448 11 Pesticide 39420 HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 1024573 11 Pesticide

39480 METHOXYCHLOR IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 72435 11 Pesticide 39516 PCBS IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 12767792 7 General Organic 39530 MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 121755 11 Pesticide 39540 PARATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 56382 11 Pesticide 39570 DIAZINON IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 333415 11 Pesticide 39600 METHYL PARATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 298000 11 Pesticide

39630 ATRAZINE(AATREX) IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L)

1912249 11 Pesticide

39730 2,4-D IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 94757 11 Pesticide 39740 2,4,5-T IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 93765 11 Pesticide 39760 SILVEX IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 93721 11 Pesticide 39782 LINDANE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 58899 11 Pesticide 39786 TRITHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 786196 11 Pesticide 39790 METHYL TRITHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 953173 11 Pesticide 46570 HARDNESS, CA MG CALCULATED (MG/L AS CACO3) 6 General Inorganic49179 TOTAL AMMONIUM, TOTAL, WATER MG/L 17778880 9 Nitrogen 50051 FLOW, RATE, INSTANTANEOUS MGD 5 Flow 50060 CHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL (MG/L) 7782505 6 General Inorganic60050 ALGAE, TOTAL (CELLS/ML) 3 Biological

Page 224: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-6

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

70300 RESIDUE,TOTAL FILTRABLE (DRIED AT 180C),MG/L 15 Solids 70301 SOLIDS, DISSOLVED-SUM OF CONSTITUENTS (MG/L) 15 Solids 70302 SOLIDS, DISSOLVED-TONS PER DAY 15 Solids 70303 SOLIDS, DISSOLVED-TONS PER ACRE-FT 15 Solids 70326 SUS SED FALL DIA(NATIVEWATER)% FINER THAN

.002MM 15 Solids

70327 SUS SED FALL DIA(NATIVEWATER)% FINER THAN .004MM

15 Solids

70328 SUS SED FALL DIA(NATIVEWATER)% FINER THAN .008MM

15 Solids

70329 SUS SED FALL DIA(NATIVEWATER)% FINER THAN .016MM

15 Solids

70330 SUS SED FALL DIA(NATIVEWATER)% FINER THAN .031MM

15 Solids

70331 SUSPENDED SED SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .062MM

15 Solids

70332 SUSPENDED SED SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .125MM

15 Solids

70333 SUSPENDED SED SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .250MM

15 Solids

70334 SUSPENDED SED SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .500MM

15 Solids

70335 SUSPENDED SED SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 1.00MM

15 Solids

70337 SUS SED FALL DIA(DISTLD WATER)%FINER THAN .002MM

15 Solids

70338 SUS SED FALL DIA(DISTLD WATER)%FINER THAN .004MM

15 Solids

70339 SUS SED FALL DIA(DISTLD WATER)%FINER THAN .008MM

15 Solids

70340 SUS SED FALL DIA(DISTLD WATER)%FINER THAN .016MM

15 Solids

70341 SUS SED FALL DIA(DISTLD WATER)%FINER THAN .031MM

15 Solids

70507 PHOSPHORUS,IN TOTAL ORTHOPHOSPHATE (MG/L AS P)

7723140 12 Phosphorous

70957 CHLOROPHYLL-A,PERIPHYTON UG/L,CHROMO-FLUORO

3 Biological

70958 CHLOROPHYLL-B,PERIPHYTON UG/L,CHROMO-FLUORO

3 Biological

71845 NITROGEN, AMMONIA, TOTAL (MG/L AS NH4) 14798039 9 Nitrogen 71846 NITROGEN, AMMONIA, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS NH4) 14798039 9 Nitrogen 71851 NITRATE NITROGEN, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS NO3) 14797558 9 Nitrogen 71886 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL, AS PO4 - MG/L 14265442 12 Phosphorous 71887 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 14797558 9 Nitrogen 71890 MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 7439976 8 Metals 71895 MERCURY, SUSPENDED (UG/L AS HG) 7439976 8 Metals 71900 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 7439976 8 Metals 74020 FLOW, PUMP OUT MGD 5 Flow 77825 ALACHLOR WHOLE WATER,UG/L 15972608 11 Pesticide

Page 225: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-7

PARM CODE 1 Parameter Description 2 CAS No 3 Group

Code 4 Group Name 5

77969 CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L 2921882 7 General Organic 80082 BOD, CARBONACEOUS, 5 DAY, 20 DEG C MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 80087 BOD, CARBONACEOUS, 20 DAY, 20 DEG C MG/L 10 Oxygen Demand 80154 SUSP. SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION-EVAP. AT 110C

(MG/L) 15 Solids

80155 SUSPENDED SEDIMENT DISCHARGE (TONS/DAY) 15 Solids 80164 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN

.062MM 15 Solids

80165 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .125MM

15 Solids

80166 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .250MM

15 Solids

80167 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN .500MM

15 Solids

80168 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 1.00MM

15 Solids

80169 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 2.00MM

15 Solids

80170 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 4.00MM

15 Solids

80171 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 8.00MM

15 Solids

80172 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 16.0MM

15 Solids

80173 BED MATERIAL SIEVE DIAMETER,% FINER THAN 32.0MM

15 Solids

81284 TRIFLURALIN(C13H16F3N3O4) WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L

1582098 11 Pesticide

81294 DYFONATE(CU/H15OPS2) WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L

944229 11 Pesticide

81346 DIETHYLHEXYLPHTHALATE ISOMRWHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L

40120692 7 General Organic

81405 CARBOFURAN (EURADAN) WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L

1563662 11 Pesticide

81408 METRIBUZIN (SENCOR), WATER, WHOLE UG/L 21087649 11 Pesticide 81410 BUTYLATE (SUTAN),WHOLE WATER SAMPLE,UG/L 2008415 11 Pesticide 81523 DIBUTYL NONANEDIOATE WHL WATER SMPL UG/L 2917739 7 General Organic 81757 CYANAZINE IN THE WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 21725462 11 Pesticide 81758 ETHOPROP IN THE WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 13194484 11 Pesticide 81894 EPTC (EPTAM) IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 759944 11 Pesticide 82068 POTASSIUM 40, DISSOLVED, K-40 PC/LITER 13966002 14 Radiological 82079 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS,

NTU 13 Physical

82088 TERBUFOS (COUNTER) TOTAL WHOLE WATER,UG/L 13071799 11 Pesticide 82133 DEOXYGENATION CONST,CARB.,K1 TO BASE

E,20C,PER DAY 10 Oxygen Demand

82410 PENOXALIN IN WHOLE WATER(PROWL) TOTAL UG/L 40487421 11 Pesticide 82553 RAINFALL IN 1 DAY INCLUSIVE PRIOR TO SAMPLE

INCHES 13 Physical

Page 226: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX C: Parameters with Data Suitable for Analysis (continued)

C-8

NOTES: 1 USEPA Storage and Retrieval (STORET) parameter code. This code is also used in the

Baseline Report and other NPS databases. 2 Description of the phase and actual measurement technique for this parameter. 3 Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number for this compound. This number

was used, where available, to aid in matching parameters to pollutants with published criteria values.

4 STORET parameter group code. 5 STORET parameter group name

Page 227: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

D-1

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria and their Respective Sources 153 parameters with published criterion values were included in the analyses in this report. Criteria in this table were derived from two sources (USEPA 2004a, b). Additional regional benchmarks for total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and turbidity were also included (Huggins 2005). These values appear in (Table 8). From these values, the limit criteria were designated. Water quality pollutants with limit criteria were then matched with relevant parameters by description. Additional state criteria were included in the core elements and priority concerns analyses where applicable. However, potential concerns analyses were based solely on the following limit criteria. See the analysis sections of this report for more detailed information on the methods of analysis.

Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 34506 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE TOTWUG/L 200 4 X 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 34516 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOTWUG/L 0.17 3 X 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 34511 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TOTWUG/L 0.59 3 X 1,1-Dichloroethylene 34501 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE TOTWUG/L 7 4 X 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 34551 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 35 3 X 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 49911 TRICHLOROBENZENE-1,2,4 BY VOA, TOTAL, WATER

UG/L 35 3

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

38760 DBCP WATER, TOTUG/L 0.2 4

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

38761 DBCP WATER, DISUG/L 0.2 4

X 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 34536 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 75 4 X 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 49912 DICHLOROBENZENE-1,2 BY VOA, TOTAL, WATER UG/L 75 4 X 1,2-Dichloroethane 32103 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.38 3 X 1,2-Dichloroethane 34531 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TOTWUG/L 0.38 3 X 1,2-Dichloropropane 34541 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE TOTWUG/L 0.5 3

Page 228: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-2

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 34346 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE TOTWUG/L 0.036 3 X 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 82626 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,WATER,TOTAL

RECOVERABLE,UG/L 0.036 3

X 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene 34546 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE, TOTAL, IN WATER UG/L 100 4 X 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 34566 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 320 3 X 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 49913 DICHLOROBENZENE-1,3 BY VOA, TOTAL, WATER UG/L 320 3 X 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 82512 M,P-DICHLOROBENZENE (MEASURES 1,3&1,4)TOTAL

UG/L 320 3

X 1,3-Dichloropropene 34561 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TOTWUG/L 0.34 3 X 1,3-Dichloropropene 77163 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE-1 WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.34 3 X 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 34571 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 63 3 X 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 49914 DICHLOROBENZENE-1,4 BY VOA, TOTAL, WATER UG/L 63 3 X 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) 34675 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN(TCDD)

TOTWUG/L 0.000000005 3

X 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 34621 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL TOTWUG/L 1.4 3 X 2,4-Dichlorophenol 34601 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL TOTWUG/L 77 3 X 2,4-Dimethylphenol 34606 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL TOTWUG/L 380 3 X 2,4-Dinitrophenol 34616 2,4-DINITROPHENOL TOTWUG/L 69 3 X 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 34611 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE TOTWUG/L 0.11 3 X 2-Chloronaphthalene 34581 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE TOTWUG/L 1000 3 X 2-Chlorophenol 34586 2-CHLOROPHENOL TOTWUG/L 81 3 X 2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol 03615 METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL,2-,EFFLUENT,TOTAL

UG/L 13 3

X 2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol 34657 DNOC (4,6-DINITRO-ORTHO-CRESOL) TOTWUG/L 13 3 X 2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol 78208 2,4-DINITRO-O-CRESOL IN WHOLE WATER UG/L 13 3 X 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 34631 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE TOTWUG/L 0.021 3 X 4,4'-DDD 39310 P,P' DDD IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00031 3 X 4,4'-DDD 39360 DDD IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00031 3 X 4,4'-DDE 39320 P,P' DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3

Page 229: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-3

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X 4,4'-DDE 39365 DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3 X 4,4'-DDT 39300 P,P' DDT IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3 X 4,4'-DDT 39370 DDT IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3 X Acenaphthene 34205 ACENAPHTHENE TOTWUG/L 670 3 X Acrolein 34210 ACROLEIN TOTWUG/L 190 3 X Acrylonitrile 34215 ACRYLONITRILE TOTWUG/L 0.051 3 Alachlor 46342 ALACHLOR (LASSO), WATER, DISSOLVED UG/L 2 4 Alachlor 50009 ALACHLOR ESA, DISSOLVED, WATER UG/L 2 4 Alachlor 77825 ALACHLOR WHOLE WATER,UG/L 2 4

X Aldrin 39330 ALDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.000049 3 X alpha-BHC 39337 ALPHA BENZENE HEXACHLORIDE IN WHOLE WATER

SAMP 0.0026 3

X alpha-Endosulfan 34361 ENDOSULFAN, ALPHA TOTWUG/L 0.056 2 Aluminum pH 6.5 - 9.0 01104 ALUMINUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS AL

UG/L 87 2

Aluminum pH 6.5 - 9.0 01105 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 Aluminum pH 6.5 - 9.0 01106 ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 Aluminum pH 6.5 - 9.0 49054 ALUMINUM, TOTAL, WATER, TCLP MG/L 0.087 2

X Anthracene 34220 ANTHRACENE TOTWUG/L 8300 3 X Anthracene 49748 ANTHRACENE, C1 ALKYL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE,

WATER UG/L 8300 3

X Anthracene 49749 ANTHRACENE, C2 ALKYL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE, WATER UG/L

8300 3

X Anthracene 49750 ANTHRACENE, C3 ALKYL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE, WATER UG/L

8300 3

X Anthracene 49751 ANTHRACENE, C4 ALKYL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE, WATER UG/L

8300 3

X Antimony 01097 ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) 5.6 3 X Arsenic 01000 ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 X Arsenic 01002 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3

Page 230: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-4

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X Asbestos 34225 ASBESTOS (FIBROUS) TOTWUG/L 7000000 4 Atrazine 39033 ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 3 4 Atrazine 39630 ATRAZINE(AATREX) IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 3 4 Barium 01007 BARIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS BA) 1000 3 Barium 49057 BARIUM, TOTAL, WATER, TCLP MG/L 1 3 Barium 49612 BARIUM TCLP, ICP, TOTAL, WATER MG/L 1 3

X Benzene 78124 BENZENE IN WATER (VOLATILE ANALYSIS) UG/L 2.2 3 X Benzidine 39120 BENZIDINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.000086 3 X Benzo(a) Anthracene 34526 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE1,2-BENZANTHRACENE

TOTWUG/L 0.0038 3

X Benzo(a) Pyrene 34247 BENZO-A-PYRENE TOTWUG/L 0.0038 3 X Benzo(b) Fluoranthene 34230 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.0038 3 X Benzo(k) Fluoranthene 34242 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE, TOTAL, WATER UG/L 0.0038 3 X Beryllium 01012 BERYLLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS BE) 4 4 X beta-BHC 39338 BETA BENZENE HEXACHLORIDE IN WHOLE WATER

SAMP 0.0091 3

X beta-Endosulfan 34356 ENDOSULFAN, BETA TOTWUG/L 0.056 2 X beta-Endosulfan 82624 ENDOSULFAN, BETA, WH WATER, TOTAL

RECOVERABLE,UG/L 0.056 2

X Bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether 34273 BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER TOTWUG/L 0.03 3 X Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether 73522 PROPANE, 2,2'-OXYBIS(1-CHLORO)- TOTWUG/L 1400 3 X Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 39100 BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 1.2 3 X Bromoform 32104 BROMOFORM,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 4.3 3 X Butylbenzyl Phthalate 34292 N-BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 1500 3 Carbofuran 81405 CARBOFURAN (EURADAN) WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

UG/L 40 4

Carbofuran 82615 CARBOFURAN, WHOLE WATER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE UG/L

40 4

X Carbon Tetrachloride 32102 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.23 3

Page 231: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-5

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X Chlordane 39350 CHLORDANE(TECH MIX & METABS),WHOLE WATER,UG/L

0.0008 3

Chloride 00940 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 Chlorine 50074 CHLORITE WHOLE WATER,MG/L 0.011 2

X Chlorobenzene 34301 CHLOROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 100 4 X Chlorodibromomethane 34306 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE TOTWUG/L 0.4 3 X Chloroform 32106 CHLOROFORM,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 5.7 3 Chlorophenoxy Herbicide

(2,4,5,-TP) 39760 SILVEX IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 10 3

Chlorophenoxy Herbicide (2,4-D)

39730 2,4-D IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 70 4

Chloropyrifos 38932 CHLORPYRIFOS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE UG/L 0.041 2 Chloropyrifos 77969 CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L 0.041 2 Chloropyrifos 81403 DURSBAN(CHLOROPYRIFOS)WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 0.041 2

X Chrysene 34320 CHRYSENE TOTWUG/L 0.0038 3 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 77093 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE WHOLE WATER,UG/L 70 4

X Cyanide 00720 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 Dalapon 30200 DALAPON, WATER, WHOLE, RECOVERABLE UG/L 200 4 Dalapon 38432 DALAPON WATER, TOTUG/L 200 4

X delta-BHC 34259 DELTA BENZENE HEXACHLORIDE TOTWUG/L 0.0123 3 X delta-BHC 46323 DELTA-BHC IN WHOLE WATER SMAPLE (UG/L) 0.0123 3 Demeton 39560 DEMETON IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.1 2

X Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 34556 1,2,5,6-DIBENZANTHRACENE TOTWUG/L 0.0038 3 X Dichlorobromomethane 32101 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.55 3 Dichloromethane 03764 DICHLOROMETHANE, TOTAL, EFFLUENT MG/L 0.005 4 Dichloromethane 03821 DICHLOROMETHANE,TOTAL,EFFLUENT UG/L 5 4

X Dieldrin 39380 DIELDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.000052 3

Page 232: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-6

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X Diethyl Phthalate 34336 DIETHYL PHTHALATE TOTWUG/L 17000 3 X Dimethyl Phthalate 34341 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE TOTWUG/L 270000 3 X Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 39110 DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE,WHOLE WATER,UG/L 2000 3 Dinitrophenols 22411 DINITROPHENOL,2,5-, TOTAL, WATER UG/L 69 3 Dinoseb 30191 DINOSEB, WATER, WHOLE, RECOVERABLE UG/L 7 4 Diquat 04443 DIQUAT, WATER TOTAL, UG/L 20 4 Ecoli 31633 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE

#/100ML 200 5

Ecoli 31648 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 200 5 X Endosulfan Sulfate 34351 ENDOSULFAN SULFATE TOTWUG/L 62 3 Endothall 38926 ENDOTHALL WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L 100 4

X Endrin 39390 ENDRIN IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.036 2 X Endrin Aldehyde 34366 ENDRIN ALDEHYDE TOTWUG/L 0.29 3 Ether, Bis( Chloromethyl) 34268 BIS (CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER TOTWUG/L 0.0001 3

X Ethylbenzene 34371 ETHYLBENZENE TOTWUG/L 530 3 Ethylene dibromide 46369 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE, TOTAL, WASTE UG/L 0.05 4

X Fluoranthene 34376 FLUORANTHENE TOTWUG/L 130 3 X Fluorene 34381 FLUORENE TOTWUG/L 1100 3 Fluoride 00950 FLUORIDE, DISSOLVED (MG/L AS F) 4 4 Fluoride 00951 FLUORIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS F) 4 4

X gamma-BHC (Lindane) 39340 GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.2 4 X gamma-BHC (Lindane) 39782 LINDANE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.2 4 Glyphosate 79743 GLYPHOSATE(GLYCINE,N-(PHOSPHONOMETHYL)-)

TOTWUG/L 700 4

X Heptachlor 39410 HEPTACHLOR IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.000079 3 X Heptachlor 46326 HEPTACHLOR AND METABOLITES IN WHOL H2O

SMPL(UG/L) 0.000079 3

X Heptachlor Epoxide 39420 HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L)

0.000039 3

Page 233: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-7

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

X Hexachlorobenzene 82621 HEXACHLOROBENZENE, WATER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE UG/L

0.00028 3

X Hexachlorobutadiene 34391 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE TOTWUG/L 0.44 3 X Hexachlorobutadiene 49915 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BY VOA, TOTAL, WATER

UG/L 0.44 3

X Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 34386 HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE TOTWUG/L 40 3 X Hexachloroethane 34396 HEXACHLOROETHANE TOTWUG/L 1.4 3 X Ideno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 34403 INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE TOTWUG/L 0.0038 3 Iron 74010 IRON, TOTAL (MG/L AS FE) 300 3

X Isophorone 34408 ISOPHORONE TOTWUG/L 35 3 Malathion 39530 MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.1 2 Manganese 01055 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 Manganese 49065 MANGANESE, TOTAL, WATER, TCLP MG/L 0.05 3

X Mercury 71890 MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 0.77 2 X Mercury 71900 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 X Mercury 71901 MERCURY,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS HG

UG/L 0.91 2

Methoxychlor 39480 METHOXYCHLOR IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.03 2 X Methyl Bromide 30202 BROMOMETHANE, WATER, WHOLE, RECOVERABLE,

UG/L 47 3

X Methyl Bromide 34413 METHYL BROMIDE TOTWUG/L 47 3 X Methylene Chloride 34423 METHYLENE CHLORIDE TOTWUG/L 4.6 3 Mirex 39755 MIREX, TOTAL (UG/L) 0.001 2 Nitrate (as N) 00620 NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 10 4 Nitrates 71850 NITRATE NITROGEN,TOTAL (MG/L AS NO3) 10 3 Nitrates 71887 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 10 3 Nitrite (as N) 00615 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 4

X Nitrobenzene 34447 NITROBENZENE TOTWUG/L 17 3 Nitrogen 00600 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1.03 5

Page 234: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-8

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

Nitrosodibutylamine,N 78207 N-NITROSODIBUTYLAMINE IN WHOLE WATER UG/L 0.0063 3 Nitrosodiethylamine,N 73611 ETHANAMINE, N-ETHYL-N-NITROSO- TOTWUG/L 0.0008 3 Nitrosodiethylamine,N 78200 N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE IN WHOLE WATER UG/L 0.0008 3 Nitrosopyrrolidine,N 73620 PYRROLIDINE, 1-NITROSO- TOTWUG/L 0.016 3 Nitrosopyrrolidine,N 78206 N-NITROSOPYRROLIDINE IN WHOLE WATER UG/L 0.016 3

X N-Nitrosodimethylamine 34438 N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE TOTWUG/L 0.00069 3 X N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine 34428 N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE TOTWUG/L 0.005 3 X N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 34433 N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE TOTWUG/L 3.3 3 Oxamyl (Vydate) 38865 OXAMYL WATER, TOTUG/L 200 4 Oxamyl (Vydate) 50410 OXAMYL OXIME,WATER,FILTERED,RECOVERABLE

UG/L 200 4

Parathion 39540 PARATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.013 2 Parathion 46315 ETHYL PARATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.013 2 Pentachlorobenzene 77793 PENTACHLOROBENZENE WHOLE WATER,UG/L 1.4 3

X Pentachlorophenol 39032 PCP (PENTACHLOROPHENOL) WHOLE WATER SAMPLE UG/L

0.27 3

pH 00400 PH (STANDARD UNITS) X 6.5 2 pH 00400 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 pH 00403 PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU X 6.5 2 pH 00403 PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU 9 2 pH 00406 PH, FIELD, STANDARD UNITS SU X 6.5 2 pH 00406 PH, FIELD, STANDARD UNITS SU 9 2 pH 00407 PH (FIELD - LITMUS) SU 9 2 pH 00407 PH (FIELD - LITMUS) SU X 6.5 2

X Phenol 34694 PHENOL(C6H5OH)-SINGLE COMPOUND TOTWUG/L 21000 3 Phosphorus Elemental 00662 PHOSPHORUS (P), WATER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE

UG/L 68 5

Phosphorus Elemental 00665 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5

Page 235: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-9

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

Phosphorus Elemental 70505 PHOSPHATE,TOTAL,COLORIMETRIC METHOD (MG/L AS P)

0.068 5

Picloram 39720 PICLORAM IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 500 4 X Polychlorinated Biphenyls

PCBs: 79819 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS),TOTAL,WATER

PG/L 0.000064 3

X Pyrene 34469 PYRENE TOTWUG/L 830 3 Simazine 04035 SIMAZINE, DISSOLVED, WATER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE

UG/L 4 4

Simazine 39055 SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) 4 4 Styrene 77128 STYRENE WHOLE WATER,UG/L 100 4 Styrene 81708 STYRENE IN THE WHOLE WATER SAMPLE MG/L 100 4 Sulfide-Hydrogen Sulfide 71875 HYDROGEN SULFIDE (MG/L) 2 2 Tetrachlorobenzene,1,2,4,5- 77734 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.97 3

X Tetrachloroethylene 34475 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TOTWUG/L 0.69 3 Tetrachloroethylene 61037 DELTA HELIUM-

3,INGROWTH,ERROR,WATER,UNFILTCC@STP/G 5 4

X Tetrachloroethylene 61057 PERCHLOROETHYLENE,TOT,WATER UG/L 0.69 3 X Thallium 01059 THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) 0.24 3 X Toluene 78131 TOLUENE IN WHOLE WATER (VOLATILE ANALYSIS)

UG/L 1000 4

X Toxaphene 39400 TOXAPHENE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.0002 2 Tributyltin (TBT) 03824 TRIBUTYLTIN,TOTAL,EFFLUENT UG/L 0.072 2 Tributyltin (TBT) 30340 TRIBUTYLTIN, WATER, WHOLE, AS TIN UG/L 0.072 2

X Trichloroethylene 39180 TRICHLOROETHYLENE-WHOLE WATER SAMPLE-UG/L 2.5 3 Trichlorophenol,2,4,5- 77687 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL WHOLE WATER,UG/L 1800 3 Turbidity 00076 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER (FORMAZIN TURB

UNIT) 10.4 5

Turbidity 82078 TURBIDITY,FIELD NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS,NTU

10.4 5

Turbidity 82079 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

10.4 5

Page 236: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Independent Toxicity (continued)

D-10

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1 Pollutant 2 PARM

CODE 3 Parameter Description 4 Lower Limit 5

Limit Criterion6

Limit Source 7

Uranium 50588 URANIUM TOTAL UG/L 30 4 X Vinyl Chloride 39175 VINYL CHLORIDE-WHOLE WATER SAMPLE-UG/L 0.025 3 Xylenes (total) 80353 XYLENE ISOMERS, O+P, WHOLE WATER UG/L 10000 4 Xylenes (total) 81551 XYLENE WHL WATER SMPL UG/L 10000 4

NOTES: 1 Indicates parameter is categorized by USEPA as a priority pollutant (USEPA 2004b). 2 Name of pollutant in USEPA criteria documents (USEPA 2004a, b). 3 USEPA Storage and Retrieval (STORET) parameter code. This code is also used in the Baseline Report (National Park Service 1995) and

other NPS databases. 4 Description of the phase and actual measurement technique for this parameter. 5 Indicates the criterion for this value is a lower limit (i.e. lowest permissible value). Criteria are upper limits unless indicated here. 6 Units of limit criterion are the same as those of the parameter. The value is the most restrictive of the following four criteria:

Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) (acute) Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) (chronic) Human Health: Water-Organism Consumption Drinking Water Standard: Maximum Concentration Load (MCL)

“Most restrictive” means the lowest upper limit or the highest lower limit. For example, total arsenic has a Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) of 340 µg/L, a Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) of 150 µg/L, a Water-Organism Criterion of 0.018 µg/L, and a Maximum Contaminant Load (MCL) of 10 µg/L. The designated limit criterion is the most restrictive of these, namely 0.018 µg/L.

7 1 = CMC (USEPA 2004b); 2 = CCC (USEPA 2004b); 3 = Water-Organism (USEPA 2004b); 4 = MCL (USEPA 2004a); 5 = Potential Regional Benchmark Value (Huggins 2005)

Page 237: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

D-11

Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1

Representative Hardness for

CUVA (mg/L) 2 Waterbody

Code 3 Pollutant 4 PARM CODE 5 Parameter Description 6 Limit

Criterion 7Limit

Source 8

X 200 Main Stem Cadmium 01025 CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 0.398 2 X 200 Springs Cadmium 01025 CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 0.398 2 X 200 Tributaries Cadmium 01025 CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 0.398 2 X 200 Main Stem Cadmium 01027 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 X 200 Springs Cadmium 01027 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 X 200 Tributaries Cadmium 01027 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 X 200 Main Stem Cadmium 01113 CADMIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CD UG/L 0.452 2 X 200 Springs Cadmium 01113 CADMIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CD UG/L 0.452 2 X 200 Tributaries Cadmium 01113 CADMIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CD UG/L 0.452 2 X 200 Main Stem Chromium 01030 CHROMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CR) 131 2 X 200 Springs Chromium 01030 CHROMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CR) 131 2 X 200 Tributaries Chromium 01030 CHROMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CR) 131 2 X 200 Main Stem Chromium 01034 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 X 200 Springs Chromium 01034 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 X 200 Tributaries Chromium 01034 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 X 200 Main Stem Chromium 01118 CHROMIUM TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CR UG/L 152 2 X 200 Springs Chromium 01118 CHROMIUM TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CR UG/L 152 2 X 200 Tributaries Chromium 01118 CHROMIUM TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CR UG/L 152 2 X 200 Main Stem Chromium (III) 04262 CHROMIUM,TRIVALENT,TOTAL RECOVERABLE,EFFLUENT MG/L 1.52 2 X 200 Springs Chromium (III) 04262 CHROMIUM,TRIVALENT,TOTAL RECOVERABLE,EFFLUENT MG/L 1.52 2 X 200 Tributaries Chromium (III) 04262 CHROMIUM,TRIVALENT,TOTAL RECOVERABLE,EFFLUENT MG/L 1.52 2 X 200 Main Stem Chromium (III) 80357 CHROMIUM, TRIVALENT, DISSOLVED, AS CR UG/L 131 2 X 200 Springs Chromium (III) 80357 CHROMIUM, TRIVALENT, DISSOLVED, AS CR UG/L 131 2 X 200 Tributaries Chromium (III) 80357 CHROMIUM, TRIVALENT, DISSOLVED, AS CR UG/L 131 2 X 200 Main Stem Copper 01040 COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 16.2 2 X 200 Springs Copper 01040 COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 16.2 2 X 200 Tributaries Copper 01040 COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 16.2 2

Page 238: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity (continued)

D-12

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1

Representative Hardness for

CUVA (mg/L) 2 Waterbody

Code 3 Pollutant 4 PARM CODE 5 Parameter Description 6 Limit

Criterion 7Limit

Source 8

X 200 Main Stem Copper 01042 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 X 200 Springs Copper 01042 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 X 200 Tributaries Copper 01042 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 X 200 Main Stem Copper 01119 COPPER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CU UG/L 16.9 2 X 200 Springs Copper 01119 COPPER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CU UG/L 16.9 2 X 200 Tributaries Copper 01119 COPPER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS CU UG/L 16.9 2 X 200 Main Stem Lead 01049 LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 5.31 2 X 200 Springs Lead 01049 LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 5.31 2 X 200 Tributaries Lead 01049 LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 5.31 2 X 200 Main Stem Lead 01051 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 X 200 Springs Lead 01051 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 X 200 Tributaries Lead 01051 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 X 200 Main Stem Lead 01114 LEAD,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS PB UG/L 7.69 2 X 200 Springs Lead 01114 LEAD,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS PB UG/L 7.69 2 X 200 Tributaries Lead 01114 LEAD,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS PB UG/L 7.69 2 X 200 Main Stem Nickel 01065 NICKEL, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS NI) 93.5 2 X 200 Springs Nickel 01065 NICKEL, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS NI) 93.5 2 X 200 Tributaries Nickel 01065 NICKEL, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS NI) 93.5 2 X 200 Main Stem Nickel 01067 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 X 200 Springs Nickel 01067 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 X 200 Tributaries Nickel 01067 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 X 200 Main Stem Nickel 01074 NICKEL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS NI UG/L 93.8 2 X 200 Springs Nickel 01074 NICKEL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS NI UG/L 93.8 2 X 200 Tributaries Nickel 01074 NICKEL,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS NI UG/L 93.8 2 X 200 Main Stem Selenium 00981 SELENIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS SE UG/L 5 2 X 200 Springs Selenium 00981 SELENIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS SE UG/L 5 2 X 200 Tributaries Selenium 00981 SELENIUM,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS SE UG/L 5 2 X 200 Main Stem Selenium 01145 SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 X 200 Springs Selenium 01145 SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 X 200 Tributaries Selenium 01145 SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 5 2

Page 239: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity (continued)

D-13

USEPA Priority

Pollutant 1

Representative Hardness for

CUVA (mg/L) 2 Waterbody

Code 3 Pollutant 4 PARM CODE 5 Parameter Description 6 Limit

Criterion 7Limit

Source 8

X 200 Main Stem Selenium 01147 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 X 200 Springs Selenium 01147 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 X 200 Tributaries Selenium 01147 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 X 200 Main Stem Silver 01075 SILVER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AG) 10.6 1 X 200 Springs Silver 01075 SILVER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AG) 10.6 1 X 200 Tributaries Silver 01075 SILVER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AG) 10.6 1 X 200 Main Stem Silver 01077 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 X 200 Springs Silver 01077 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 X 200 Tributaries Silver 01077 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 X 200 Main Stem Silver 01079 SILVER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS AG UG/L 12.5 1 X 200 Springs Silver 01079 SILVER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS AG UG/L 12.5 1 X 200 Tributaries Silver 01079 SILVER,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS AG UG/L 12.5 1 X 200 Main Stem Zinc 01090 ZINC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS ZN) 181 2 X 200 Springs Zinc 01090 ZINC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS ZN) 181 2 X 200 Tributaries Zinc 01090 ZINC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS ZN) 181 2 X 200 Main Stem Zinc 01092 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 X 200 Springs Zinc 01092 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 X 200 Tributaries Zinc 01092 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 X 200 Main Stem Zinc 01094 ZINC,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS ZN UG/L 184 2 X 200 Springs Zinc 01094 ZINC,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS ZN UG/L 184 2 X 200 Tributaries Zinc 01094 ZINC,TOTAL RECOVERABLE IN WATER AS ZN UG/L 184 2 X 200 Main Stem Zinc 50117 ZINC,ICAP TEST METHOD, TOTAL RECOVERABLE MG/L 1.84 2 X 200 Springs Zinc 50117 ZINC,ICAP TEST METHOD, TOTAL RECOVERABLE MG/L 1.84 2 X 200 Tributaries Zinc 50117 ZINC,ICAP TEST METHOD, TOTAL RECOVERABLE MG/L 1.84 2

Page 240: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX D: Designated Limit Criteria for Parameters with Hardness-Dependent Toxicity (continued)

D-14

NOTES: 1 Indicates parameter is categorized as a priority pollutant (USEPA 2004b). 2 Concurrent hardness values were not available for most metals observations. Therefore, conservative hardness levels were assumed based

on average observed hardness in each waterbody type. For more information on this approach, see the analysis section of this report. 3 Waterbody code assigned by CPCB for purposes of analysis 4 Name of pollutant in USEPA criteria documents (USEPA 2004a, b). 5 USEPA Storage and Retrieval (STORET) parameter code. This code is also used in the Baseline Report (National Park Service 1995) and

other NPS databases. 6 Description of the phase and actual measurement technique for this parameter. 7 Units of limit criterion are the same as those of the parameter. The value is the most restrictive of the following four criteria:

Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) (acute) Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) (chronic) Human Health: Water-Organism Consumption Drinking Water Standard: Maximum Concentration Load (MCL)

“Most restrictive” means the lowest upper limit or the highest lower limit. For example, total arsenic has a Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) of 340 µg/L, a Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) of 150 µg/L, a Water-Organism Criterion of 0.018 µg/L, and a Maximum Contaminant Load (MCL) of 10 µg/L. The designated limit criterion is the most restrictive of these, namely 0.018 µg/L. The aquatic life criteria for these parameters were derived from the hardness-dependent equations published in the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria document (USEPA 2004b).

8 1 = CMC (USEPA 2004b); 2 = CCC (USEPA 2004b); 3 = Water-Organism (USEPA 2004b); 4 = MCL (USEPA 2004a); 5 = Potential Regional Benchmark Value (Huggins 2005)

Page 241: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

E-1

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Potential Concerns Exceedance Data

These data were used to develop Table 10 and Table 11 for the identification of potential water quality concerns for this park. For more information on the background and methods of these analyses, please see the potential concerns analysis section of this report.

Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

1 Cuyahoga River ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 2 84 2.38 1 Cuyahoga River ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 104 7998 1.30 1 Cuyahoga River ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 51 2601 1.96 1 Cuyahoga River ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 190 8856 2.15 1 Cuyahoga River ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

UG/L 3 4 1 42 2.38

1 Cuyahoga River CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 0.398 2 11 121 9.09 1 Cuyahoga River CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 81 8587 0.94 1 Cuyahoga River CHLORDANE(TECH MIX &

METABS),WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.0008 3 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 255 1427866 0.02 1 Cuyahoga River CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L 0.041 2 1 16 6.25 1 Cuyahoga River COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 16.2 2 5 270 1.85 1 Cuyahoga River COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 101 14589 0.69 1 Cuyahoga River CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 56 2534 2.21 1 Cuyahoga River DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 607 131129 0.46 1 Cuyahoga River E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 6 138 3610 3.82

Page 242: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-2

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

1 Cuyahoga River GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE WATER,UG/L

0.2 4 1 5 20.00

1 Cuyahoga River HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L)

0.000039 3 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 5.31 2 12 396 3.03 1 Cuyahoga River LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 114 18966 0.60 1 Cuyahoga River MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 0.1 2 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 144 13233 1.09 1 Cuyahoga River MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 0.77 2 1 28 3.57 1 Cuyahoga River MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 9 219 4.11 1 Cuyahoga River NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 20 1293 1.55 1 Cuyahoga River NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 4 1 39 2.56 1 Cuyahoga River NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1.03 5 57 3249 1.75 1 Cuyahoga River NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 10 3 47 2679 1.75 1 Cuyahoga River PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 5 1042 0.48 X 1 Cuyahoga River PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU 6.5 2 7 3598 0.19 X 1 Cuyahoga River PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6470 34937465 0.02 1 Cuyahoga River SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 1 8 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 8 459 1.74 1 Cuyahoga River SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 4 16 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) 4 4 3 93 3.23 1 Cuyahoga River TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER

(FORMAZIN TURB UNIT) 10.4 5 35 2600 1.35

1 Cuyahoga River TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

10.4 5 494 99408 0.50

1 Cuyahoga River ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 13 2257 0.58 2 Mill Creek ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 14 196 7.14 2 Mill Creek ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) 5.6 3 2 4 50.00 2 Mill Creek ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 9 81 11.11 2 Mill Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 9 189 4.76

Page 243: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-3

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 Mill Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 18 864 2.08 2 Mill Creek CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 1 17 5.88 2 Mill Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 27 1053 2.56 2 Mill Creek CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 10 100 10.00 2 Mill Creek LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 18 684 2.63 2 Mill Creek MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 10 100 10.00 2 Mill Creek MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 4 44 9.09 2 Mill Creek NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 8 72 11.11 2 Mill Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 2 52 3.85 X 2 Mill Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 38 1520 2.50 2 Mill Creek THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) 0.24 3 1 1 100.00 2 Mill Creek ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 25 1275 1.96 2 Tinkers Creek ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 5 25 20.00 2 Tinkers Creek ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 9 41 21.95 2 Tinkers Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 38 628 6.05 2 Tinkers Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 14 1095 1.28 2 Tinkers Creek CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 2 88 2.27 2 Tinkers Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 61 2733 2.23 2 Tinkers Creek CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 12 144 8.33 2 Tinkers Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 52 3692 1.41 2 Tinkers Creek E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 6 13 169 7.69

2 Tinkers Creek LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 84 6245 1.35 2 Tinkers Creek MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 98 10682 0.92 2 Tinkers Creek NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 4 16 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 10 4 1 12 8.33 2 Tinkers Creek NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1.03 5 109 11990 0.91 2 Tinkers Creek NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 10 3 85 9350 0.91 2 Tinkers Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 2 208 0.96 X

Page 244: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-4

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 Tinkers Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 2 230 0.87 2 Tinkers Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 254 17929 1.42 2 Tinkers Creek TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER

(FORMAZIN TURB UNIT) 10.4 5 5 65 7.69

2 Tinkers Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

10.4 5 58 6206 0.93

2 Tinkers Creek ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 6 280 2.14 2 Deer Lick Run ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 25 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 1 4 25.00 2 Deer Lick Run COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 4 16 25.00 2 Deer Lick Run LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 3 15 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 5 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 5 20.00 2 Chippewa Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 7 49 14.29 2 Chippewa Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 4 296 1.35 2 Chippewa Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 48 6.25 2 Chippewa Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 12 372 3.23 2 Chippewa Creek LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 20 10.00 2 Chippewa Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 171 5.26 2 Chippewa Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 23 1725 1.33

2 Brandywine Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Brandywine Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 15 1560 0.96 2 Brandywine Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 7 71 9.86 2 Brandywine Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 38 2774 1.37

Page 245: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-5

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 Brandywine Creek E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

298 6 10 110 9.09

2 Brandywine Creek LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 3 21 14.29 2 Brandywine Creek PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 105 0.95 2 Brandywine Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 86 3278 2.62 2 Brandywine Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 78 8346 0.93

2 Boston Run CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Boston Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 11 462 2.38 2 Boston Run LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 6 16.67 2 Boston Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 85 5.88 2 Boston Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 28 2156 1.30

2 Salt Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 72 1.39 2 Salt Run COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 6 16.67 2 Salt Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 10 420 2.38 2 Salt Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 84 7.14 2 Salt Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2508 1.32

2 Dickerson Run CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 25 20.00 2 Dickerson Run COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 32 6.25 2 Dickerson Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 14 420 3.33 2 Dickerson Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 156 3.85 2 Dickerson Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2475 1.33

2 Dickerson Run ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 30 6.67 2 Furnace Run CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Furnace Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 3 219 1.37 2 Furnace Run COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 8 12.50 2 Furnace Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 12 492 2.44 2 Furnace Run LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 4 25.00

Page 246: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-6

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 Furnace Run PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 74 1.35 X 2 Furnace Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 39 7.69 2 Furnace Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2442 1.35

2 Yellow Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 9 33.33 2 Yellow Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 72 1.39 2 Yellow Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 7 14.29 2 Yellow Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 15 630 2.38 2 Yellow Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 110 4.55 2 Yellow Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2475 1.33

2 Mud Brook E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

298 6 6 36 16.67

2 Mud Brook PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 10 50 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 61 381 16.01 2 Little Cuyahoga R CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 18 201 8.96 2 Little Cuyahoga R CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 7 286 2.45 2 Little Cuyahoga R COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 35 1011 3.46 2 Little Cuyahoga R CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 16 256 6.25 2 Little Cuyahoga R LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 37 833 4.44 2 Little Cuyahoga R MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 9 81 11.11 2 Little Cuyahoga R MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 1 13 7.69 2 Little Cuyahoga R NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 7 49 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 39 2.56 2 Little Cuyahoga R PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 99 3462 2.86 2 Little Cuyahoga R SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 3 21 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 4 16 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 3 47 6.38 2 Ohio Canal ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 8 32 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 14 35.71

Page 247: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-7

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 Ohio Canal CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 10 180 5.56 2 Ohio Canal COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 7 35 20.00 2 Ohio Canal LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 17 90 18.89 2 Ohio Canal NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 1 1 100.00 2 Ohio Canal PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 39 242 16.12 2 Ohio Canal ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 6 44 13.64 2 Spring Creek CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Spring Creek CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 118 9514 1.24 2 Spring Creek COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 14 14.29 2 Spring Creek E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 44 3014 1.46 2 Spring Creek LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Spring Creek PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 318 1.89 2 Spring Creek TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 90 7490 1.20

2 Spring Creek ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 12 16.67 2 Haskell Run CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 71 1.41 2 Haskell Run E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 13 494 2.63 2 Haskell Run PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 30 6.67 2 Haskell Run TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 26 1898 1.37

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 1 1 100.00

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 3 33.33

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00

2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 2 50.00

2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 1 100.00

2 misc tributary CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 27 83 32.53 2 misc tributary CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 46 4087 1.13

Page 248: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-8

Waterbody Code1 Waterbody Name2 Parameter Description3 Limit

Criterion4 Limit

Source5 Exceed. Count6

Total Count7 % Exceed.8 Lower

Limit9

2 misc tributary COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 16 157 10.19 2 misc tributary E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 137 7422 1.85 2 misc tributary E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 6 6 36 16.67

2 misc tributary LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 6 29 20.69 2 misc tributary PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 5 213 2.35 X 2 misc tributary PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 97 2783 3.49 2 misc tributary TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 244 18788 1.30

2 misc tributary ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 7 62 11.29 5 WWTP outfall ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 14 66 21.21 5 WWTP outfall ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 15 117 12.82 5 WWTP outfall CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 5 34 14.71 5 WWTP outfall NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 4 1 68 1.47 5 WWTP outfall PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 134 0.75 X 5 WWTP outfall PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 52 862 6.03 5 Industrial outfall PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 7 14.29 X

Page 249: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody and Parameter (continued)

E-9

NOTES: 1 1 = Main Stem; 2 = Tributaries; 3 = Springs; 4 = Lentic Waters; 5 = Point Sources 2 Name of waterbody. See Appendix B and park map (Figure 3) for locations of all stations with respect to waterbody. Upstream or

downstream refer to the portion of the Current River upstream or downstream of the confluence with the Jacks Fork River. 3 Description of the phase and actual measurement technique for this parameter. 4 Units of limit criterion are the same as those of the parameter. The value is the most restrictive of the following four criteria:

Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) (acute) Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) (chronic) Human Health: Water-Organism Consumption Drinking Water Standard: Maximum Concentration Load (MCL)

“Most restrictive” means the lowest upper limit or the highest lower limit. For example, total arsenic has a Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) of 340 µg/L, a Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) of 150 µg/L, a Water-Organism Criterion of 0.018 µg/L, and a Maximum Contaminant Load (MCL) of 10 µg/L. The designated limit criterion is the most restrictive of these, namely 0.018 µg/L. The aquatic life criteria for these parameters were derived from the hardness-dependent equations published in the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria document (CITE Water Criteria).

5 1 = CMC (USEPA 2004b); 2 = CCC (USEPA 2004b); 3 = Water-Organism (USEPA 2004b); 4 = MCL (USEPA 2004a); 5 = Potential Regional Benchmark Value (Huggins 2005)

6 Exceedance Count = Number of times observed value exceeded limit criterion for this parameter. 7 Total Count = Total number of observations of this parameter. 8 % Exceedance = Exceedance Count divided by Total Count multiplied by 100, or the percentage of observations that exceed the limit

criterion for this parameter 9 This limit criterion is a lower limit. Unless marked in this column, limit criteria are upper limits.

Page 250: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

E-10

Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 13 169 7.69 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 4 48 8.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 7 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0052 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 14 224 6.25 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 54 1.85 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 4 50.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 39 2418 1.61 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 3 36 8.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 4 1 39 2.56 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 2 290 0.69 X 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 90 8190 1.10 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 45 2790 1.61

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0053 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 32 3.13 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0054 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 5 25 20.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0057 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 2 4 50.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0057 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 20 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0061 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 12 144 8.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 6 66 9.09 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 5 35 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 9 153 5.88 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 1 2 50.00

Page 251: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-11

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 120 0.83 X 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 16 256 6.25 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0062 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 19 5.26 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 3 387 0.78 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 9 33.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 28 812 3.45

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0063 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 90 10.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0069 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0069 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 10 100 10.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 4 28 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 6 36 16.67 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 8 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0083 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 13 169 7.69 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0086 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 22 484 4.55

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 107 0.93 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 5 70 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 43 3053 1.41 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 3 36 8.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 60 4320 1.39 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 51 5406 0.94

Page 252: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-12

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0088 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 14 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 207 58788 0.35 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 11 121 9.09 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0090 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 106 28196 0.38

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0115 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 7 49 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 14 294 4.76 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 36 16.67 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0120 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 5 100 5.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0121 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

298 5 9 81 11.11

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0122 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0128 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 4 16 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0128 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 36 16.67 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0129 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 168 36792 0.46 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0129 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 112 24416 0.46

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0141 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0146 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 33 1188 2.78

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 6 36 16.67 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 7 49 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 4 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 8 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0162 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 7 14.29 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 9 81 11.11 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 18 11.11 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0187 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 14 196 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 2 84 2.38

Page 253: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-13

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ARSENIC, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 51 2601 1.96 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 23 529 4.35 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ATRAZINE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

UG/L 3 4 1 42 2.38

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CADMIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CD) 0.398 2 11 121 9.09 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 12 144 8.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CHLORDANE(TECH MIX &

METABS),WHOLE WATER,UG/L 0.0008 3 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 236 1423552 0.02 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 CHLOROPYRIFOS IN WATER UG/L 0.041 2 1 16 6.25 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 COPPER, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS CU) 16.2 2 5 270 1.85 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 9 180 5.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 DDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L) 0.00022 3 1 1 100.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 27 810 3.33

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 LEAD, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS PB) 5.31 2 12 396 3.03 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 14 308 4.55 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 23 529 4.35 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 MERCURY, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS HG) 0.77 2 1 28 3.57 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 2 26 7.69 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1.03 5 57 3249 1.75 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 10 3 47 2679 1.75 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 385 0.26 X 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PH, LAB, STANDARD UNITS SU 6.5 2 7 3598 0.19 X 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5851 34819301 0.02 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 SELENIUM, DISSOLVED (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 1 8 12.50 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 1 11 9.09 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 SIMAZINE IN WHOLE WATER (UG/L) 4 4 3 93 3.23 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER

(FORMAZIN TURB UNIT) 10.4 5 30 2520 1.19

Page 254: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-14

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0202 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 22 4.55 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 89 7921 1.12 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 87 7569 1.15 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 49 8281 0.59 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 14 3766 0.37 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 76 14288 0.53 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 48 2496 1.92 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 136 29784 0.46 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 GAMMA-BHC(LINDANE),WHOLE

WATER,UG/L 0.2 4 1 5 20.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE (UG/L)

0.000039 3 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 71 18318 0.39 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 MALATHION IN WHOLE WATER SAMPLE

(UG/L) 0.1 2 1 1 100.00

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 111 12654 0.88 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 5 190 2.63 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 19 1292 1.47 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 247 0.40 X 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 319 103994 0.31 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 7 448 1.56 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 4 16 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER

(FORMAZIN TURB UNIT) 10.4 5 5 80 6.25

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU

10.4 5 175 38500 0.45

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0203 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 7 2149 0.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0209 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 8 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0209 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 4 16 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 12 144 8.33

Page 255: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-15

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 12 25.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 3 33.33 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 4 56 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 5 25 20.00 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 13 182 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0226 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 14 7.14 1 Cuyahoga River CUVA0249 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 14 210 6.67

2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 14 196 7.14 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 ANTIMONY, TOTAL (UG/L AS SB) 5.6 3 2 4 50.00 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 9 81 11.11 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 9 189 4.76 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 18 864 2.08 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 1 17 5.88 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 27 1053 2.56 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 10 100 10.00 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 18 684 2.63 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 10 100 10.00 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 4 44 9.09 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 8 72 11.11 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 2 52 3.85 X 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 38 1520 2.50 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 THALLIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS TL) 0.24 3 1 1 100.00 2 Mill Creek CUVA0214 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 25 1275 1.96 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 12 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 18 11.11 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0135 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 7 49 14.29 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 4 16 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 9 927 0.97

Page 256: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-16

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 16 12.50 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 52 3692 1.41 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 6 16.67 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 2 208 0.96 X 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 65 4420 1.47 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0164 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 58 6206 0.93

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 16 12.50 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 8 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 8 12.50 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0166 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 81 11.11 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 23 529 4.35 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 3 120 2.50 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 2 88 2.27 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 33 2508 1.32 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 57 5814 0.98 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 98 10682 0.92 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1.03 5 109 11990 0.91 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 NITROGEN, TOTAL, AS NO3 - MG/L 10 3 85 9350 0.91 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 2 230 0.87 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 110 12100 0.91 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 TURBIDITY,HACH TURBIDIMETER

(FORMAZIN TURB UNIT) 10.4 5 5 65 7.69

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0167 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 212 0.94 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 18 16.67 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 20 10.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0172 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 10 100 10.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0173 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 13 169 7.69

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 5 25 20.00

Page 257: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-17

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 18 16.67 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 14 14.29 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0179 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 3 33.33 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 1 100.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0182 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0189 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 8 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0189 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 7 49 14.29 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 NITRATE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 10 4 1 12 8.33 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 81 11.11 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0192 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 5 20.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 4 16 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 8 64 12.50 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 2 48 4.17 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 12 144 8.33 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 12 144 8.33 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 16 352 4.55 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 4 16 25.00 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 32 1024 3.13 2 Tinkers Creek CUVA0193 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 3 63 4.76 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 25 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 CHROMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CR) 152 2 1 4 25.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 4 16 25.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 3 15 20.00

Page 258: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-18

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 5 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 20 20.00 2 Deer Lick Run CUVA0181 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 5 20.00 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 7 49 14.29 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 4 296 1.35 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 48 6.25 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 12 372 3.23 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 20 10.00 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 171 5.26 2 Chippewa Creek CUVA0151 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 23 1725 1.33

2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0126 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 3 33.33 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0126 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 20 20.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0127 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 2 50.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0127 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 36 16.67 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0133 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 12 16.67 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 14 14.29 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0137 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 20 400 5.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 15 1560 0.96 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 3 54 5.56 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 38 2774 1.37 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 7 14.29 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 105 0.95 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 41 2747 1.49 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0138 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 78 8346 0.93

2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0140 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

298 5 10 110 9.09

Page 259: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-19

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0144 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Brandywine Creek CUVA0145 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 11 462 2.38 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 6 16.67 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 85 5.88 2 Boston Run CUVA0125 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 28 2156 1.30

2 Salt Run CUVA0112 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 72 1.39 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 6 16.67 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 10 420 2.38 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 84 7.14 2 Salt Run CUVA0112 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2508 1.32

2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 25 20.00 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 32 6.25 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 14 420 3.33 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 156 3.85 2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2475 1.33

2 Dickerson Run CUVA0109 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 30 6.67 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 3 219 1.37 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 8 12.50 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 12 492 2.44 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 4 25.00 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 74 1.35 X 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 39 7.69 2 Furnace Run CUVA0095 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2442 1.35

Page 260: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-20

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 9 33.33 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 72 1.39 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 7 14.29 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 15 630 2.38 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 110 4.55 2 Yellow Creek CUVA0085 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 2475 1.33

2 Mud Brook CUVA0067 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU UREASE #/100ML

298 5 6 36 16.67

2 Mud Brook CUVA0100 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Mud Brook CUVA0101 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0007 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 8 64 12.50 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0007 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0007 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 28 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0009 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 3 9 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0013 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0015 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 3 9 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0015 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0015 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 5 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0015 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 6 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0017 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 2 4 50.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0017 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 4 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0017 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 4 50.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0019 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 3 9 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0019 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 12 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0020 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0020 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0020 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 45 11.11 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0021 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0021 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 12 25.00

Page 261: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-21

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0040 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 4 16 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0040 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 12 16.67 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0040 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 42 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0043 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0043 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 5 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0043 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 6 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0043 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 16 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0043 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 4 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 11 121 9.09 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 14 196 7.14 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 6 276 2.17 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 29 986 2.94 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 16 256 6.25 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 22 770 2.86 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 MANGANESE, TOTAL (UG/L AS MN) 50 3 9 81 11.11 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 MERCURY, TOTAL (UG/L AS HG) 0.91 2 1 13 7.69 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 7 49 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 9 2 1 39 2.56 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 56 3192 1.75 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 SELENIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS SE) 5 2 3 21 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 SILVER, TOTAL (UG/L AS AG) 12.5 1 4 16 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0044 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 37 2.70 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0045 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0045 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 10 10.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0045 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 4 16 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0045 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 5 25 20.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0045 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 7 49 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0046 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 2 50.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0046 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 2 50.00

Page 262: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-22

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 7 49 14.29 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 2 50.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 4 25.00 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 6 33.33 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 54 11.11 2 Little Cuyahoga R CUVA0051 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 6 16.67 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0002 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 8 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 6 33.33 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 12 16.67 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 NICKEL, TOTAL (UG/L AS NI) 93.8 2 1 1 100.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 15 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0004 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 12 16.67 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 8 12.50 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 10 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 4 50.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 30 16.67 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0008 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 16 12.50 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 4 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 8 12.50 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 8 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 4 50.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 10 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0012 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 16 12.50 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0022 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0022 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 2 50.00

Page 263: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-23

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Ohio Canal CUVA0035 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 4 16 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0035 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 4 50.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0037 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 12 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 5 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0042 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 4 16 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 4 16 25.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 4 144 2.78 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0198 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 9 81 11.11 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0212 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 7 56 12.50 2 Ohio Canal CUVA0212 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 70 7210 0.97 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 14 14.29 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 37 2664 1.39 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 3 33.33 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 318 1.89 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 56 5824 0.96

2 Spring Creek CUVA0130 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 12 16.67 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 48 2304 2.08 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 7 350 2.00 2 Spring Creek CUVA0130a TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 34 1666 2.04

2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 71 1.41 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 13 494 2.63

Page 264: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-24

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 30 6.67 2 Haskell Run CUVA0114 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 26 1898 1.37

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

CUVA0016 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 1 1 100.00

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

CUVA0016 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 3 33.33

2 Springfield Lake Outlet

CUVA0016 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00

2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

CUVA0003 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 2 50.00

2 Wingfoot Lake Outlet

CUVA0003 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 1 100.00

2 misc tributary CUVA0023 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 1 100.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0065 E.COLI,THERMOTOL,MF,M-TEC,IN SITU

UREASE #/100ML 298 5 6 36 16.67

2 misc tributary CUVA0087 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0087 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 7 511 1.37 2 misc tributary CUVA0087 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 7 14.29 2 misc tributary CUVA0087 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 10 430 2.33 2 misc tributary CUVA0087 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 60 5.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0087 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 22 1650 1.33

2 misc tributary CUVA0103 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0103 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 14 14.29 2 misc tributary CUVA0103 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 12 504 2.38 2 misc tributary CUVA0103 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 5 20.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0103 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 6 96 6.25 2 misc tributary CUVA0103 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 34 2618 1.30

2 misc tributary CUVA0105 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0105 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 10 10.00

Page 265: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-25

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 misc tributary CUVA0105 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 13 533 2.44 2 misc tributary CUVA0105 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 6 16.67 2 misc tributary CUVA0105 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 80 6.25 2 misc tributary CUVA0105 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 34 2584 1.32

2 misc tributary CUVA0105 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 9 11.11 2 misc tributary CUVA0107 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0107 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 7 14.29 2 misc tributary CUVA0107 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 4 140 2.86 X 2 misc tributary CUVA0107 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 1 4 25.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0107 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 2 74 2.70

2 misc tributary CUVA0113 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 1 1 100.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0113 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 1 66 1.52 2 misc tributary CUVA0113 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 10 10.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0113 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 6 198 3.03 2 misc tributary CUVA0113 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 3 33 9.09 2 misc tributary CUVA0113 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 23 1541 1.49

2 misc tributary CUVA0113 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 8 12.50 2 misc tributary CUVA0118 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 2 4 50.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0118 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 7 14.29 2 misc tributary CUVA0118 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 18 11.11 2 misc tributary CUVA0118 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 5 180 2.78

2 misc tributary CUVA0132 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 4 16 25.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0132 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 16 12.50 2 misc tributary CUVA0132 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 5 195 2.56 2 misc tributary CUVA0132 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 2 10 20.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0132 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 73 1.37 X

Page 266: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-26

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 misc tributary CUVA0132 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 2 46 4.35 2 misc tributary CUVA0132 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 18 1332 1.35

2 misc tributary CUVA0147 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 9 33.33 2 misc tributary CUVA0147 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 32 6.25 2 misc tributary CUVA0147 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 15 615 2.44 2 misc tributary CUVA0147 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 23 736 3.13 2 misc tributary CUVA0147 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 25 1825 1.37

2 misc tributary CUVA0147 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 26 7.69 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 9 33.33 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 25 2550 0.98 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 1 10 10.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 41 3526 1.16 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 4 25.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 22 924 2.38 2 misc tributary CUVA0153 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 33 3432 0.96

2 misc tributary CUVA0159 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 3 9 33.33 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 5 400 1.25 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 12 16.67 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 8 368 2.17 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 LEAD, TOTAL (UG/L AS PB) 7.69 2 1 4 25.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 16 512 3.13 2 misc tributary CUVA0159 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 16 1280 1.25

2 misc tributary CUVA0159 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 1 5 20.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0163 CADMIUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS CD) 0.452 2 5 25 20.00 2 misc tributary CUVA0163 CHLORIDE,TOTAL IN WATER MG/L 230 2 8 560 1.43 2 misc tributary CUVA0163 COPPER, TOTAL (UG/L AS CU) 16.9 2 2 32 6.25

Page 267: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-27

Waterbody Code 1 Waterbody Name2 NPSSTATID3 Parameter Description 4 Limit

Criterion5Limit

Source6Exceed. Count7

Total Count8

% Exceed.9

Lower Limit1

2 misc tributary CUVA0163 E. COLI - MTEC-MF N0/100ML 298 6 27 1053 2.56 2 misc tributary CUVA0163 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 13 273 4.76 2 misc tributary CUVA0163 TURBIDITY,LAB NEPHELOMETRIC

TURBIDITY UNITS, NTU 10.4 5 32 2272 1.41

2 misc tributary CUVA0163 ZINC, TOTAL (UG/L AS ZN) 184 2 2 14 14.29 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 4 16 25.00 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 6 36 16.67 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 NITRITE NITROGEN, TOTAL (MG/L AS N) 1 4 1 68 1.47 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 134 0.75 X 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0089 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 17 289 5.88 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0099 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 8 64 12.50 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 5 25 20.00 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 1 2 50.00 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0215 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 5 25 20.00 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 ALUMINUM, TOTAL (UG/L AS AL) 87 2 5 25 20.00 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 ARSENIC, TOTAL (UG/L AS AS) 0.018 3 9 81 11.11 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 CYANIDE, TOTAL (MG/L AS CN) MG/L 0.0052 2 4 32 12.50 5 WWTP outfall CUVA0224 PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL (MG/L AS P) 0.068 5 22 484 4.55 5 Industrial outfall CUVA0228 PH (STANDARD UNITS) 6.5 2 1 7 14.29 X

Page 268: Water Quality Analysis for the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring … · 2015. 1. 12. · Of the 142,951 records of 473 parameters at 227 stations in the park study area (roughly

APPENDIX E: Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CUVA) Exceedances by Waterbody, Location, and Parameter (continued)

E-28

NOTES: 1 1 = Main Stem; 2 = Tributaries; 3 = Springs; 4 = Lentic Waters; 5 = Point Sources. 2 Name of waterbody. See Appendix B and park map (Figure 3) for locations of all stations with respect to waterbody. Upstream or

downstream refer to the portion of the Current River upstream or downstream of the confluence with the Jacks Fork River. 3 NPS Station ID code. This code has been assigned by NPS for unique identification of locations. See Appendix B for complete list. 4 Description of the phase and actual measurement technique for this parameter. 5 Units of limit criterion are the same as those of the parameter. The value is the most restrictive of the following four criteria:

Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) (acute) Aquatic Life: Freshwater Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) (chronic) Human Health: Water-Organism Consumption Drinking Water Standard: Maximum Concentration Load (MCL)

“Most restrictive” means the lowest upper limit or the highest lower limit. For example, total arsenic has a Criterion Maximum Concentration (CMC) of 340 µg/L, a Criterion Chronic Concentration (CCC) of 150 µg/L, a Water-Organism Criterion of 0.018 µg/L, and a Maximum Contaminant Load (MCL) of 10 µg/L. The designated limit criterion is the most restrictive of these, namely 0.018 µg/L. The aquatic life criteria for these parameters were derived from the hardness-dependent equations published in the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria document (USEPA 2004b).

6 1 = CMC (USEPA 2004b); 2 = CCC (USEPA 2004b); 3 = Water-Organism (USEPA 2004b); 4 = MCL (USEPA 2004a); 5 = Potential Regional Benchmark Value (Huggins 2005) (Huggins 2005); 6 = State of Ohio criterion value (Ohio EPA 2002).

7 Exceedance Count = Number of times observed value exceeded limit criterion for this parameter. 8 Total Count = Total number of observations of this parameter. 9 % Exceedance = Exceedance Count divided by Total Count multiplied by 100, or the percentage of observations that exceed the limit

criterion for this parameter. 10 This limit criterion is a lower limit. Unless marked in this column, limit criteria are upper limits.


Recommended