+ All Categories
Home > Documents > WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

Date post: 10-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: dinhxuyen
View: 219 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
30
Transcript
Page 1: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting
Page 2: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

EVM – Contracting and Subcontracting

Breakout Session #: C15

Lisa Wolf, MBA, EVP, PMP Dale Gillam, MBA, PMP, CPCM

Date: Monday, July 25

Time: 4:00pm- 5:15pm

Page 3: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

2

Abstract

Things are changing in the EVM Government Contracting world. Recently, a class deviation was released lowering compliance review thresholds and the OMB released a memorandum reducing the burden of certifying EVM Systems. These changes have been met with some confusion in industry as to what it all really means. Discuss how these changes impact what to look for when contracting with EVM requirements, properly flowing down the requirements to subcontractors, and ensuring it all meets PM needs.

Page 4: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

Why We Should Care: Contracts Controls the Environment

• Contracts controls the levers to align Government, Prime, and Subcontractor interests and efforts

• EVM is a key lever to ensure effective “integrated program management” across the entire program environment

Scope, Schedule, & Budget

Scope, Schedule, & Budget

Program Team - Worst Case Program Team - Best Case

Stakeholders Pulling in Different Directions

Stakeholders Working to Same Direction

Page 5: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

Topics

• What is an EVMS? • A Brief History of EVM • What is the EIA-748 EVMS Standard? • The Governing Policies • The Way we Were • The Way we are Changing • How to Help the Program Manager and

Subcontractors

4

Page 6: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is an EVMS?

5

EV

EVM

EVMS

• A Project Management discipline – The ‘forcing function’ for solid, integrated

project management

* Wolf Project Management, LLC, Project Management and EVMS Surveillance, 2012. Used with Permission.

Page 7: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is an EVMS?

• EV – The value of work performed on a

project based upon the baseline estimated costs to perform the subject work

6

EV

EVM

EVMS

Page 8: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is an EVMS?

• EVM – A quantified, disciplined approach to project

management requiring the integration of cost, scope, and schedule into a single baseline against which project execution performance in measured (called a “Performance Measurement Baseline” or PMB).

– One cannot accurately calculate EV without managing a project using EVM.

7

EV

EVM

EVMS

Page 9: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is an EVMS?

• EVMS – The system of people, processes, and tools established,

maintained, and followed to accurately and adequately perform EVM. “A forcing function for solid Project Management practices.”*

– An EVMS is implemented primarily for internal management use.

– It is also used to satisfy customer requirements for project visibility and performance reporting when contractually proscribed.

– Attempting to perform EVM without an EVMS leads to “garbage in-garbage out.”

8

EV

EVM

EVMS

Page 10: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is an EVMS? • One of six business systems subject to DCMA

oversight: – Accounting systems (252.242-7006) – EVM systems (252.234-7002) – Estimating systems (252.215-7002) – Material management and accounting systems

(252.242-7004) – Property management systems (252.245-7003) – Purchasing systems (252.244-7001)

• Both the system clause and business system clause (252.234-7005) need to be on a contract for the business system controls to be in effect

Page 11: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

A Little EVM History... Highlights: • 1959 – Introduced as “PERT/COST”

– Booz Allen ‘invented’ PERT for estimating in 1963 for the Navy Polaris Program

• 1967 – Became C/SCSC – Cost/Schedule Control Systems Criteria – 35 Criteria

• 1989 – Elevated to Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition

• 1991 – First Contract Canceled Due to Deficiencies Discovered by EVM

• 1996 – C/SCSC Became EVM

10

Page 12: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

A Little EVM History...

Highlights (Continued): • 1998 – ANSI/EIA-748 Issued

– 32 Guidelines – Updated/Refreshed Every 5 Years – Now on Version C (2013 Release) – Now ‘only’ EIA

• 2002 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act • 2011 – PARCA Office Created

11

Page 13: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

What is the EIA-748 Standard?

• Formerly called the ANSI/EIA-748 – ANSI dropped with move to new certifying

body, “EIA-748” is the document number – EIA is the Electronic Industries Alliance – The NDIA IPMD is responsible for periodic

updates to the standard – Latest version – “EIA-748-C” - was

released March 1, 2013 • Available for purchase at store.sae.com

for $77

12

Page 14: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

EIA-748 Content • The primary goal for an EVMS • The seven principles of an EVMS • The 32 basic guidelines grouped by five major

categories: – Organization – Planning, scheduling, and budgeting – Accounting considerations – Analysis and management reports – Revisions and data maintenance

• A process elaboration on the application of the guidelines

• The system documentation expectations • The system evaluation process, acceptance

and surveillance expectations

Page 15: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

14

The Governing Policies - OMB

• OMB Circular A-11 • Requires - ‘All major acquisitions with

development effort will include the requirement for the contractor to use an EVMS’ that meets the EIA-748 Standard (§1.5.5.4)

• States EVMS is ‘normally used on FP Incentive and CR contracts for major acquisitions’ or on FFP on major acquisitions if the Contract or TO contains a ‘significant amount of development effort’

• Identifies EVM as a ‘critical component’ of risk management

• Leaves the definition of ‘major’ to the agencies

Page 16: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

15

The Governing Policies - FAR

• FAR Subpart 34.2 • 34.201 – Policy – EVMS is required for

major acquisitions for development (points to OMB A-11). May require for ‘other acquisitions’, as determined by agency

• 34.202 – Requires Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs)

• 34.203 – Provides solicitation provisions 52.234-2, -3, and -4

Page 17: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

16

The Governing Policies

• FAR 52.234-2 • Notice of Pre-Award IBR

• FAR 52.234-3 • Notice of Post-Award IBR

• FAR 52.234-4 • Contractor required to use an EVMS that

has been determined as compliant with EIA-748 by its CFA

• If not determined compliant, must provide comprehensive EVMS implementation plan

Page 18: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

17

The Governing Policies

• DFARS 234.201 Policy • For cost or incentive contracts valued at…

• >= $20M, the EVMS shall comply with EIA-748 • >= $50M, now >=$100M, the EVMS shall have

their EVMS determined as compliant with the EIA-748 by the Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA)

• COs can still require EVMS on lower dollar value or other contract types

• Solicitation provisions at 252.234-7001 and 7002

Page 19: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

18

The Way We Were…

• For DoD, whenever the 252.234-7002 clause was on contract, DCMA was supposed to conduct • “surveillance reviews” • “compliance reviews” if the total contract

value was >=$50M • The reality was

• DCMA was significantly backlogged for getting a compliance review

• Surveillance reviews by local DCMA reps was inconsistent in application and performance

Page 20: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

19

And Now…A Change in DoD • Class Deviation 2015-O0017, Earned Value

Management System Threshold was published September 28, 2015

• DoD has raised the compliance review threshold from $50M to $100M

• DoD also established a $100M total contract value for when surveillance by DCMA would automatically apply

• Surveillance can still be done on <$100M contracts if data is suspect

• This does not change when EVMS is required – just reviews by DCMA

Page 21: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

20

What Does That Mean?

• If our contract is <$100M, do we still have to be compliant with the EIA-748? • Yes, if it has the 252.234-7002 clause. • You still must be compliant, regardless of

whether you are subject to surveillance under the class deviation.

• The requirement does not change; your risk of external audit does.

• But do not get complacent!

Page 22: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

21

What Does That Mean?

• Must we still flow down EVM requirements to our Subcontractors if they are below the $100M threshold? • Yes, if you have the 252.234-7002 clause

and they are identified in subsection k(1) or k(2).

• If not specifically identified, then the prime decides the approach (e.g., flow-down, incorporate into Prime’s EVMS)

• The actual requirement for EVMS did not change; just the level at which compliance reviews and surveillance will occur.

Page 23: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

22

What Are Non-DoD Requirements?

• These can vary greatly. Some examples: • Department of Commerce: EVM required on all

IT projects ≥ $25M • FAA: Required on contracts ≥$10M • HUD: Required for major IT investments ≥$5M • Treasury: External validation required on

contracts ≥$50M. Self-validation required on contracts ≥$20M and < $50M. “Core” EVM requirements (10 guidelines) on contracts <$20M.

Page 25: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

24

And Now…A Change by OMB • Issued a memo on 10/23/15 with the goal to

reduce the burden of certifying EVMS • The intent was to encourage “reciprocity” to

recognize and accept compliance reviews from one government organization to another

• The intent is good, but is hard to see it embraced by DoD or Intel communities

• The idea has been debated for years. The OMB memo brought new energy to it.

• NASA and FAA did sign a reciprocity agreement on 3/31/16

Page 26: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

25

How Can I Best Support the PM?

• During Proposal Stages: • Let the PM and Capture Manager know

right away if EVM requirements are on the contract so it is considered in bid and proposal efforts

• Use Q&A process to clarify or redefine requirements

• Make sure things like staffing and software tools are considered

• Engage your EVM Focal Point early

Page 27: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

26

How Can I Best Support the PM?

• During Project/Program Execution • Engage early with customers – use the

IBR as a catalyst for implementation • Keep the PM and line managers on board • Make sure PM team understands scope

changes must be communicated to project controls personnel, too

• Make sure Project Controls personnel are aware of any contract mods that affect cost, scope, or schedule

• Ensure timely changes/modifications

Page 28: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

27

How Can I Best Support the Subcontractor? • Speak with the PM and Project Controls personnel

to understand what is actually needed. • Formal flow-down or integration into prime’s

EVMS? • Does the subcontractor need their own

approved system? How will the Prime conduct surveillance?

• If integrated, will the sub be a CAM over other team members?

• Must they take your (the Prime’s) EVM training?

Page 29: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

28

How Can I Best Support the Subcontractor? • How will business rhythm and data be integrated

into the IMS and IPMR? • How will actuals be accounted for to ensure

honoring ‘time now’ and other considerations? Dual-timekeeping?

Page 30: WC16 - C15 - EVM-Contracting and Subcontracting

29

• Lisa Wolf – [email protected]

• Dale Gillam – [email protected]

Contact Information


Recommended