Date post: | 13-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | maurice-walters |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Web 2.0’The web, and our customers, have moved on….’
Presentation to TWICTDecember 2007
Graham Jordan, TWICT Partnership Analyst
• There is a very good 5 minute YouTube video here about web 2.0 but you are either not connected to the internet or prevented from accessing YouTube.
• I found out how to embed it via google, and a YouTube instructional video, which you’ll also not be able to access.
Web 2.0 Content & Concepts
• Value is in the content and how you use it
• Users involved in embellishing content
• Publish / recycle content• Enables people to be more
independent of traditional web authors and those who would otherwise manipulate their content
• Users choose what they get, how they get it, when they get it, where they get it
• Users not organisations at the centre
• Developers engaging with users in their own environment
• Open standards• Think locally, act globally• Reuse, Repurpose, Recycle• Content and data in many
places • A relationship where all inform
eachother• Permission based activity• Read write and process via the
‘cloud’
ExpressionPublication
Profession
Opi
nion
Details
ReputationHobby
Certificates
Purchase
Know
ledg
eAvatars
Audience
What I shareW
here I work
What‘s said about me
Wha
t I lik
e
How and where
to join me Who can certify
my identity
What and how I buy
Wha
t I kn
ow
What represent meWhat I sayWho I know
What interests me
FOAF
iViva
Based on an idea by Fred Cavazza
Aggregators –pulling content together
• Applet / widget integration– MyYahoo, Netvibes,
Pageflakes, Facebook
• Mash ups – pulled from multiple sources, published back to web– Moo– Google Maps– Chicago Crime Map– Tube sms– Train Locator
• Software as a service
Use of Web 2.0• RSS update / news aggregators
– RSS news / Jobs feeds– myYahoo– TWICT website
• Wikis– DigiTV
• Blogs– Cheltenham Flood blog– BSF
• Communities of Practice– Selective, focussed and a smaller
audience– Govx
• Digital challenge– Hex– Flash– Online communities
• Social Networks– Facebook
• Codeworks• North East IT Managers Forum
• Social Bookmarking– Del.icio.us
• Image libraries– CISCO use a Flickr-type product
for their corporate image bank• Media sharing
– Podcasts / webcasts– YouTube
• UK Government use• Webcasts
• Virtual worlds– second life etc
Strengths & Weaknesses• Agility• Enhances the way we work• Innovation / speed of iteration • Speed of deployment• Low thresholds• Real time content• Allows publishers to
– Retain ownership of data– Benefit from developers adding
value
• Allows developers to – fail fast, learn quickly– create applications
• Allows users to– Decide how to use applications– Access content from more locations
(enables agile working)
• Not easy to define, ‘sell’ the concept
• Requires a mind set change and a leap of faith
• Perception• Can blur professional and
personal identities• Immaturity of market
• Reliability (and reputation)
• Social engineering
Opportunities & Threats• People are actively looking for
information • We can have a dialogue with
users • If we make information available
other people could develop applications for it free of charge
• Business uses of concepts, tools, way of thinking
• Growth of systems services suppliers
• Many Web 2.0 applications use 3rd party managed processing power and storage
• Emerging business market and commercial grade SLAs
• Challenges corporate way of thinking• Small and faster will win over big and
slow• Information overload• Employee access to web2.0
applications• Greater risk of ‘class action’ law suits • Powerless to stop 3rd party
developers or users using web 2.0• Some applications that are free carry
advertising we can’t control• If we don't make information
available other people will - without our collaboration
• Reuse of our data out of context• Seemingly innocent data can be
aggregated to information than can be used for criminal or terrorist behaviour
History
’from Available through Accessible to Meaningful’
History
’from Available through Accessible to Meaningful
MP3 standard
BT Launches ADSLMosaic Browser
MSN Messenger
Skype
BBC websiteFirefox
Napster
iPod
Wikipedia
History
’from Available through Accessible to Meaningful
MP3 standard
BT Launches ADSLMosaic Browser
Today’s graduates started secondary school
MSN Messenger
Skype
BBC websiteFirefox
Napster
iPod
Wikipedia
Current Trends
• Moving from geeks in bedrooms to venture-capital funded teams– Capitalisation of added
value• More standardisation
– Microformats etc• Agile data storage and
processing – Moving to commercial
grade SLAs• Move to offline browser
based applications
• Aggregators / widgets within ‘eachothers’ products– Eg flikr in Facebook,
Facebook in Netvibes– Meebo single view of
multiple instant messenger accounts
– User can use one page for their ‘online life’ = ‘social dashboard’?
• Web 3.0 is coming…..– ‘Wisdom of crowds’
prevented from becoming ‘madness of mobs’ through adding ‘respect of experts’
– eg wikipedia etc.
Council 2.0
• The Web 2.0 philosophy– The whole is greater than the sum of the parts– Users should participate, not just consume, actively
contributing, helping customise media and technology for their own purposes, as well as for their community
• Similarities with Place Shaping and Community Engagement agenda…..?
Council 2.0
• Building our own widgets
• Reuse of public sector information– Licensing use of xml feeds,
APIs– More attractive to re-users
at Tyne and Wear or regional scale?
• Fewer APIs to integrate
• Eg roadworks information
• Democratising our data• In-house mash-ups?• Thinking about the
functionality that’s out there and how we could use it– Image banks– Knowledge banks– Communications– Contact directories– Systems services
NewsPublish
Contacts
Opi
nion
Discuss
ReputationInterests
Certificates
Procurement
Know
ledg
eVirtu
alNetworks
And consultW
here I work
What‘s said about me
Coun
cil vi
ews o
n…
How and where
to talk to meWho can certify
my identity
What and how I buy
& Do
cume
ntsReaching different
audiences
What I sayWho I know
What areasinterest me?
Based on an idea by Fred Cavazza
Can we use Web 2.0 tools to provide these functions?
Are we concerned about users in Council Services by-passing ICT and using these without our knowledge?
Immediate Implications• All bad?• Security
– A question of balance?
• Are we looking at / working with OpenID etc?
• Sharepoint / Intranet development– Implications for those developing
corporate dashboards?
• Aggregators – The ultimate CRM for the
customer? – eg Netvibes
• Community Presences– Already on Facebook etc,
developed by individuals
• Council Content– Should we be developing
widgets for netvibes, Facebook etc.?
• Collaboration?– Should we publish all our
contacts lists on LinkedIn? • New Web services development
– Do we need to do it ourselves?
• Reputation management– Who’s saying what about us?
• Awareness of Web2.0 and semantic Web within ICT departments?