REPORT

1

MORE DEMOCRACY

IS THE ONLY SOLUTION

2

PEOPLE’S INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL ENQUIRY COMMISSION

Justice P.K. Shamsuddin

(Former Judge, High Court of Kerala) – Chairman

Members

1. Prof. S. Varghese

(Former Member, State Human Rights Commission &

Principal, University College, Thiruvananthapuram)

2. Dr V. Thankamani

(Former Syndicate Member & Head,

Dept. of Bio-Technology, University of Kerala)

3. Adv. J. Sandhya

(Former Member,Kerala State Commission for

Protection of Child Rights)

4. Prof. A.G.George

(Former Professor of English,

University College, Thiruvananthapuram )

–Member Secretary

3

Submitted to

The Hon’ble Governor of Kerala

Copy :

1.The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Kerala

2.The Hon’ble Minister for Education, Kerala

3.The Hon’ble Opposition Leader, Kerala

4.Hon’ble Vice Chancellors of all the Universities in Kerala

5.The public

4

Contents

Page No

Preface 07 - 08

Terms of Reference 09 - 10

Introduction 11 - 14

Chapter I Depositions 15 - 34

Chapter 2 Issues and Findings 35 - 39

Chapter 3 Recommendations 40 - 44

Conclusion 45 - 45

Annexure 46 - 55

31, August 2019

Preface

5

There is a steadily escalating chorus of complaints, genuine concern & allegations that the academic atmosphere in the campuses of

Higher Educational Institutions (hereinafter referred as HEIs) in the country in general and in the State of Kerala in particular is under severe threat

and that the heightened political activities of at least some of the forums of students and teachers are hampering the functioning and development

of the HEIs. In the University College, Thiruvananthapuram, and some other colleges, there have been several instances where human rights are

violated and fundamental civil rights being denied. Patronage given by some political parties to the forums of students, teachers and other

employees is often misused, which inevitably leads to indiscipline and violence on the campuses. It is also alleged that the legacy, tradition and

heritage of many of these institutions have been steadily eroded by such unscrupulous activities. Prevailing laws, rules, regulations and

conventions to prevent all these undesirable activities are seldom adhered to. There is also a general feeling that it is the lethargy and indifference

of the concerned authorities that's aggravating the problems.

Instances of human rights violation, political violence, malpractices and such other irregularities are being reported regularly from many

college campuses all over the state. One of the recent incidents was an attempt to commit suicide by an academically bright girl student named

Nikhila Satheesan in the University College, TVM, following physical and mental harassment by some students having political affiliations.

Eventually she had to shift to another college so as to continue her studies.

It is in the backdrop of such disturbances, a public meeting was held on 10 May 2019 at the Press Club, Thiruvananthapuram, under

the auspices of Save University College Campaign Committee. A large number of academics, senior citizens, former students of the University

College, teachers, parents and media persons were present on the occasion. It was unanimously decided by the meeting to appoint an

independent judicial enquiry commission to enquire into the matter and submit a report of its finding on the allegations and the actions to be taken

as remedial measures. Accordingly, an independent judicial commission was formed with following persons:

Justice P.K. Shamsuddin (Former Judge, High Court of Kerala) – Chairman

Members

1. Prof. S. Varghese (Former Member, State Human Rights Commission & Principal, University College, TVPM)

2. Prof. (Dr) V. Thankamani (Former Syndicate Member & Former Head of the department, Dept of Bio-Technology, University of Kerala)

3. Adv. J. Sandhya (Former Member, Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights)

4. Prof. A.G. George (Professor of English (Retd), University College, Thiruvananthapuram ) – Member Secretary

It was also decided that the tenure of the Commission will be till 31 August 2019 and that the Commission will submit its report to the

Honorable Governor, Chief Minister, Minister for Education and Vice Chancellors of the Universities in Kerala.

Prof. A.G. GeorgeMember Secretary

Phone : 9447102040, 9400590303

Email : enquirycommissionunicollege@gmail.com

6

Terms of Reference

The committee held its first meeting on 2019 May 30 at Ernakulam in the residence of the Chairman and finalized the terms of reference as

follows.

1. What is ailing our College/University campuses in Kerala: Has the atmosphere prevailing on college/University campuses in Kerala

deteriorated, vitiated enough to drive young scholars to extreme steps like succumb to psychological stress, attempts to commit suicide,

poor academic performance, termination of studies half way or seek transfer to another Institution etc? If yes, what are the factors

influencing such a degradation?

2. Formation and working of Students Unions: Do they adhere stringently to the norms, rules and regulations laid down by the University

with regard to elections like notification for nominations, equal opportunities to all recognized students unions and day to day performance

to carry out stipulated duties & responsibilities?

3. Admission to courses & conduct of examinations: Are the procedures fair, open, transparent and as per university regulations? Whether

there are irregularities in the admission of students, conduct of examinations, maintenance of daily attendance registers, internal

assessment, records of organizations of academic/ socio-cultural programmes, seminars, workshops etc by various departments?

Methodology adopted to meet the above TOR

The commission held public hearings on June 14 and 15, and, July 23,2019 at Gandhi Smaraka Nidhi Hall, Thycuad,

Thiruvananthapuram, where all stakeholders had the opportunity to express their experiences and opinions and make suggestions. Wide publicity

was given about the dates and venue of the sittings. And also invitations were sent to all the students unions requesting to attend the hearings .It

was made clear that the commission will not disclose the identity of those who do not want to disclose their identities. It was also pointed out that

those who cannot appear in person can send their opinions and experiences by e mail.

There was very good response from the public and a large number of people came forward to give evidence on various aspects

relating to the enquiry. It was revealed during the hearings at Thiruvananthapuram that the incidents and other irregularities are not confined or

peculiar to the campus of University College, Thiruvananthapuram alone, but they apply to almost all the educational campuses in the state.

In these circumstances there was pressing demand from teachers, students and public that the Commission should hold sittings at

Ernakulam and Kozhikode. Accordingly, besides the sittings at Thiruvananthapuram held on different occasions, the Commission also held public

hearings on July 9, 2019 at PWD Rest House, Ernakulam and on August 4, 2019 at MSS Hall Kozhikode.

The Commission also had visited the University College on 9th

August ,2019 and interacted with the Principal. Thus the Commission

could get first-hand knowledge of the conditions prevailing in the Colleges affiliated to the University of Kerala, Mahatma Gandhi University,

University of Calicut, Kannur University, Kerala Technological University (KTU) and CUSAT.

7

Introduction

Historically, Universities and colleges emerged as centres of higher learning and seats of knowledge which illuminate the path of

progress. With respect to studies, research and creative abilities, a large section of students along with their organizations had given remarkable

contributions for the socio-cultural development of our society. During the colonial rule they had the freedom of India as their goal, which motivated

them to take an active part in the Nationalist politics.

Subsequently after attainment of Independence, student organizations developed and played a vital role in opposing the draconian

acts of the rulers and even the internal emergency. A large proportion of the student community has been asked to participate in the electoral

process and exercise their franchise in the general elections which has given the student community a recognition and a new responsibility in our

society.

We are aware of the present national situation of our country. The people of India at present are passing through a difficult phase.

Terrorism, communalism, mob lynching and other atrocities of all kinds are being witnessed in their worst forms. In such situations, we need more

social leaders who can lead the people in the right direction. Students who have had a rudimentary exercise in the democratic process within the

campus will be equipped to handle crisis situations when they are assigned responsible positions in our society and thus have a significant role in

patterning the future generations of society.

In this background, it is to be mentioned that a new direction and matured leadership is to emerge to carry forward the unfinished

democratic tasks of the freedom struggle to its logical culmination.

The students do enjoy a status and respect in the society as they are recipients of modern education which often qualifies them to

handle responsible positions in the social, legal, technical, medical, educational and cultural fields. Students who are equipped with the analytical

tools of modern science are found to be in possession of an effective weapon for social change. The trend of the social change that has churned

the Indian society has invariably percolated into the minds of the students, turning their ideological convictions against the degenerated social

customs and corrupt political practices widely prevalent in our current society.

Students are the torch bearers of the nation. The college and University campuses are not islands cut off from the main stream of the

social and political system; rather they are intimately connected with the body politic. Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, one of the greatest leaders of

India's freedom struggle, once opined that “Many try to keep students away from the freedom struggle with the false canon of ‘students are for

studies only'. I think, study alone cannot be the thapasya of a student’s life. Study means reading some books. By this, one may get well in

examinations, may get a gold medal and a good job but that alone will not help one to attain nobleness of character”. Deshabandhu CR Das once

argued "education may wait, but swaraj cannot.” Recall what the great poet Rabindranath Tagore once said “Let your hatred burn down like blades

of grass both those who perpetrate injustice and those who tolerate it”.

But in Independent India, of late, we are witnessing a gradual degeneration in the standards of conduct of the political system which is

reflected in the student activism also. In our University campuses, anyone can find a sort of vicious politics and power struggle among the petty

political representatives with different combinations and cross connections. Over politicization by the petty political forces have already maligned

the nobility of politics and more particularly of student politics. The foregoing paragraph underlines only the negative aspects of what is going on at

present in the name of campus democracy. We should endeavour to create conditions where by which real democracy can be practised without

fear or favour and thus restore the nobility of student struggles. In this background we have to examine what are the obstacles which prevents us

from establishing democratic campuses based on higher values.

Kerala scenario: Vulnerable

8

The maturing political consciousness among students and the existence of many associations with a variety of interests ensured that

our campuses yielded personalities who contributed much to the progress of our society. Organizations of all hues also played a vital role in this

development. But with the influx of the decadent influence from the external political forces the atmosphere within the campuses turned more and

more violent and dominative. Student leaders found themselves reduced to mere pawns who act according to the behest of their political masters.

At least some student organizations tended to sweep out their own fiefdoms where they forbid other students fronts from functioning

democratically by threat of violence

Thus the idea of the dictatorship of single organization in a campus was spawned and authoritarianism is steadily strangulating

democratic rights. This phenomenon has now rapidly overrun many campuses and democratic functioning of College unions has been reduced to

a farce. Domination over other organizations by a particular student wing has become the order of the day. Democratic norms and principles were

thrown out to the winds. The regulations framed by the Universities for holding elections have been craftily sabotaged. Dictatorship of the

authoritarian organizations is being imposed upon the campuses which lead to the growth of unhealthy practices. The concept of the democratic

campus where all shades of political thought will engage themselves in a healthy vibrant and youthful competition to capture the discerning mind of

the students, has been given a silent and decent burial.

Due to the impact of this, the University College, TVM, has degenerated itself into the citadel of all sorts of criminal activities for the

past several decades. The free ground of political dictatorship has paved the way for nurturing of an unholy nexus between criminal gangs and

political groups within the campus. As a result, human rights violations continued unabated in the University College. The campus has become a

haven for criminals for years - incidents involving alcohol and drug abuse are all too common. Using the label of the Students Federation of India

(SFI), they lock up students and attack them physically and mentally. The authorities of that college were playing the role of mere mute spectators;

rather a section of them are actively involved in this game plan. Even more shocking is that there exists a section of the teachers who lend their

support to these criminals. It seems as if the post of the principal is reserved for those supine souls who stand with or turn a blind eye to the

criminal activities of the students union.

More or less, similar situation is prevailing in many campuses in Kerala. The inquiry into these grave issues conducted by this

Commission has brought to light that similar situations are prevalent in Govt. Arts College, TVPM, Maharaja's College, Ernakulam, Govt. College,

Madappally, Govt. Arts & Science College, Kozhikode; Govt. College, Chittur, Govt. Victoria College, Palakkad and many other institutions. As

regards the MG College TVM the commission received complaints that ABVP which happens to be the dominant students union, just like the SFI,

prevented the activities of other organizations within the campus. Democracy is dead in these campuses which reek of violence, thuggery and

malpractices. The prime responsibility of such a sorry state of affairs lies with the political system which is promoting all sorts of hegemony across

colleges in the State. A serious effort to correct these anomalies and usher in a qualitative change has never been implemented in any of the

college campuses in the past couple of decades.

All these violent political moves have created a situation due to which the atmosphere in these colleges, to a large extent has become

de-politicized and non-socialized. Majority of students are not involved in political or social activities. Only a handful of them are really involved in it.

Notably, due to the impact of the unhealthy and criminally motivated political practices, an aversion has developed among the students. Most of

them always keep away from the mainstream student wings of political fractions.

The views on students and politics held and expressed by Mahatma Gandhi, Subhash Chandra Bose, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Lala

Lajpat Rai, Annie Besant, and others represent the spirit of the time they lived in. However, what should be the political consciousness and

behaviour in our time? It must be based upon higher culture and ethics. It can't be violent and violative of the fundamental constitutional rights and

human rights... Nature abhors vacuum. The activities of the student organizations which have degenerated to criminal intimidation cannot be just

wished off by pious sermons or by legally proscribing them.

Historical experiences have established beyond a shade of doubt that such negative trends in campus politics can only be effectively

combated by systematically cultivating political thoughts based on higher concepts of culture and social responsibility. A brief survey of the campus

9

politics during the freedom struggle will reveal the creative power of student's organizations and the role they played in organizing the masses

against British imperialism. In spite of this glorious tradition of student politics what we now witness in campus are such degenerated activities

which will put any honest individual to shame. It is no wonder that all right thinking people tend to take the unfortunate stand that political activities

should be forbidden in campus. Unfortunate though, these honest citizens have arrived at such an unhistorical understanding because of their

genuine concern about the intellectual maturity of the younger generation. A dissection of their concerns will yield that they aren't against practicing

campus politics as such but they surely abhor its unwelcome violent manifestations. The mechanisms that have evolved for practicing healthy

students political activities from the colonial days to the recent past have actually stood the test of time. Time and again whenever our national

body politics was engulfed in a crisis of values, it is only the conscious minority of the organized section of the students raised their banner of

revolt. Therefore we have to reluctantly conclude that the root cause of the degeneration in campus life is not because of the practicing of political

activities. Its reasons have to be sought elsewhere. Consequently the mechanisms which are now in place for practicing student politics should be

effectively utilized to foster an atmosphere of healthy democratic debate in the campus. The authorities concerned should ensure that such a

situation prevails.

Kothari commission has observed “The future destiny of India is shaped in the class rooms." It also recommended that our education

must be value oriented. In the document of New Education Policy – 1986, it is observed “Our education system must be an effective tool for

cultivation of social and moral values”. Mahatma Gandhi, the father of our nation thought that education without morality and character formation is

a sin. It means, education, besides imparting knowledge, information and technical and professional skills must play a vital role for moral and

spiritual development of the student. Unfortunately no space has been provided for value education in our education system. We feel that this is

one of the major factors for the crisis of character prevailing in the contemporary society. We therefore strongly recommend that this vacuum

should be filled by providing sufficient space for value education.

10

Chapter I

Depositions

In general, all persons who gave evidence, expressed concern about the prevailing atmosphere at the University College and other

colleges. The main concern raised by the leaders of the student organizations and students was that Students Federation of India (herein after

referred to SFI for short) does not permit the other student unions in the campus to contest the college union elections and students are

intimidated by creating an atmosphere of violence from joining other student unions. They also stated that at the time of admission, the students

are forced to report at the SFI desk and only thereafter they are to proceed to the admission venue. Similarly it was alleged that all students are

compelled to take SFI membership. Those who refused to comply with the demands of the SFI leaders were tortured mentally and physically. The

evidence adduced by the former teachers and others are also on the same lines.

In spite of wide publicity given about the sittings, no representative of the Students Federation of India turned up and attempted to

present their version about the complaints targeted against the way in which SFI was functioning in university and college campuses. It is pertinent

to note that Anand. Y, a BA student of Journalism and Mass Communication, the only SFI member who gave evidence, did not deal with the

criticisms leveled against the SFI and only made some charges against the management of Mar Ivanios College.

Now we shall deal with the evidence adduced by individuals who appeared before the commission.

Evidence of Students

Ms. Nikhila A 1st

year Degree student of University College (Now transferred to S N College, Varkala) : The student stated that “in the UC

there was no importance for academics, only party politics dominated; informed the tutor and Head of department, there was no positive response;

was forced to leave classes for party “ paripadi”; though the minimum stipulated working days was 90 not even half of that was satisfied; students

must do whatever SFI ordered ; was never excused even on very personal private grounds, even in the scorching sun was asked to participate in

protest marches at the secretariat; SFI female comrades too did the same as their male counterparts; was assaulted physically , never allowed to

go back home after classes, forced to stay back for Valentine Day “paripadi”; English classes- just one hour was engaged during the entire

semester; examination proved to be difficult and tough without attending class lectures; complained to Principal individually; but there was no

action; while undergoing severe harassments neither classmates nor teachers gave any physical or mental support; instead was persuaded to

bear quietly and withdraw written complaints; it was too much to endure, felt so isolated frustrated and helpless; felt like ending such a life; after

the unfortunate incident there was so much of pressure from many , the concerned Minister sent word through a messenger promising that steps

will be taken to clear up the mess in UC and similar incidents shall not recur in future ; the SFI union chairman was so cruel ; he tried to indulge in

character assassination spread malicious propaganda and canards like failed love affair and involvement of BJP etc.; The DCE personally advised

and instructed to continue the studies in UC a reputed meritorious institution and decision on her part to leave the UC will bring a black mark on

the UC and the Government; marking of attendance (teachers noted down names in bits of paper) and conduct of examinations were highly

improper; mass copying and use of mobile phones were widespread, the gallery classes were very suitable for malpractices with the invigilators,

after distribution of question papers, choosing to stay below during the entire duration to save the strain of going up and down; thus facilitating and

turning a blind eye to copying ; there were very old students in the class who ensure continued stay in the college, through repeat re admissions,

only for party work”. The student said “conditions in SN College seemed certainly well where 3 boys who indulged in ragging were arrested by

police and case registered against them”.

Mr. Shahazad M K , BA LLB ( MG University) Secretary, All India Democratic Students Organization (AIDSO), Mr. Shyju A (former

student, University College), Mr. Rahul R, B.Tech (TKM Engineering College), member AIDSO: Students of AIDSO affiliated to SUCI stated

that “at present SFI is the only students union functioning in University College and that other unions are not permitted to function. The campus

atmosphere is devoid of democracy and has paralyzed students’ thought process. The Govt. does not do anything for a value based education.

11

The present system aims at only skill development and nothing is done to develop empathy or democratic values. More thrust has to be given to

human values, socio economic issues, human rights and broader perspectives. They alleged that “self-financing and autonomous colleges do not

support creativity or democracy. Internal assessment is misused as a punitive tool”.

Mr. Najeeb N A (B.Tech student) belonging to Students Islamic Organization (SIO) and Mr. Hardil A, (BSc student of University College)

belonging to Fraternity Movement of India (FMI): Shared their experience - “while attempting to establish the units of their unions in University

College and put up banner of All Kerala Anti Ragging Campaign on the walls of the Sanskrit College building at Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram.

The SFI workers strongly objected and created a ruckus, claimed that SFI was very much there for preventing issues of ragging etc. and there was

no need for another organization in the campus. SIO students were pulled up, dragged to SFI unit “IDI MURI”, assaulted and beaten up. The boy

was admitted to Medical college hospital followed by Ayurvedic treatment. He contested UC elections in the subsequent year for which he was

threatened severely. No other political party could enter University College campus and enjoy organizational freedom. Students who voted for

SIO were handpicked and thrashed. Students were scared to come out and vote. Submission of nominations was prevented by physical threats

and, by tactically ensuring that the Returning officer was kept away till the time deadline. Mobile phones were snatched away by SFI activists and

questioned rudely by outside party leaders. They had complained to the Principal but he too was helpless. ID cards and college diaries were

forcefully taken away from students to prevent support to nominations other than SFI. They told that SFI was enough and no need for any other

student organizations. Their attempts to ally with KSU also failed since the Congress leadership did not favour the idea. The police also refused to

act even on repeated complaints of harassment by SFI”. They also suggested the introduction of system of checking of students’ ID cards, at the

IN and OUT gates of University College.

Salwa Abdulkader who was a student of BA Political science during 2016-19 at Madappally College, Kozhikode appeared before the

commission and filed her written statement about the torture she suffered during the said period. She also gave oral evidence in which she stated

that Madappally Govt. college is under the control of SFI. In the beginning itself she had revealed her political views. She was also a NSS

volunteer during her studies in that college. She was subjected to mental and physical torture inside the class room and also in an NSS camp by

SFI activists who were supported by certain teachers and other staff of the college, she stated. In the initial days, when she questioned the ragging

by senior SFI students, she was slapped publicly by the male SFI activists. At the fag end of the course, one day they pulled her robe and beat her

up. On another day when she attempted to prevent a junior student from being forcefully taken to the male bathroom for being tortured by SFI

activists, she was dragged in public and abused her calling her as a prostitute. On the same day evening she and another student were subjected

to physical torture again. She alleged that at that point if the general public who witnessed the incident had not intervened, their lives would have

been in danger. Further, the elections to the college union were not conducted properly. She also alleged that it was with the connivance of outside

party activists the SFI committed all these irregularities. She also alleged that about the torture she had given several complaints to the police and

principal and other higher authorities, but so far no action was taken on that. She said that to put an end to these kinds of atrocities and to close

down torture room, serious legal action has to be taken by the authorities.

Mr. Emil P S, Member All India Democratic Students Organization (AIDSO), a former BA student of University College and presently

registered as Pvt. Candidate

He averred the following. He had “initially joined University College for BA (Islamic history), dropped out and continued under pvt. registration as

BA (English). As a fresher on day 1 he was forced to join SFI in spite of the protest made by him. Help desk is managed by specially trained 3

member, one with a fearsome face and other 2 pleasant looking, SFI teams to collect membership fees, party donations etc. The atmosphere was

very disturbing and unpleasant; was told to join SFI or leave. SFI membership was mandatory to study at UC. After 1 week all students were

forced to leave classes and go for SFI “paripadi”. There were at last 3 such “paripadis” per week; teachers remained silent and passive; one

teacher who refused to let go students was transferred (as punishment) to Chittoor college. In yet another incident he was ordered to go for the

“paripadi”, holding the SFI flag and lead a protest march from the front. He boldly refused, was hauled up rudely but luckily escaped thrashing

thanks to girl students who were around”; another day he was slapped for refusing to “obey SFI”, taken to “ IDI MURI”, abused using foul

language, mobile phone snatched; felt so scared very lonely isolated prevented from attending classes or library; situation became sickening,

12

unbearable without any friends, could not study or perform in any way; attempted to contest election but was prevented at nomination submission

stage itself by threatening; the SFI goons threatened the 2 students who were to support his nomination , told them not to dare appear at scrutiny

of nominations. The UC has such a great heritage that anyone getting an admission would love to graduate from there. But now the environment

there is not conducive for learning. The union unit room has become a store for knives, petrol bombs, machetes and exclusive “IDI MURI”. About

5-6 students discontinued during 1st

year itself; two ABVP students also were beaten up mercilessly; Islamic history 1st

year students were asked

to write “SFI” on their foreheads. One girl resented, but later she joined SFI and continued the course. Ultimately he decided to give up, leave UC

since he could not study, did not know anything and was sure to fail in the examination”.

Mushad Ahmed: Former student of University College, BA (Islamic History) 2003-06, affiliated to SIO, presently a businessman . “During

the 1st

year chose to remain docile subjugated to SFI; second year onwards started resenting, expressing difference of opinion, dared to form a

unit of SIO in the UC that irked the SFI; was beaten up by 250 + member gang, complaint to the police of no avail; police rather gave full protection

to the guilty; suggested that union elections must be conducted and monitored by an external agency”.

Mr. Amal P T, Mr. Amal Chandra and Ms. Aiswarya, Degree students of University College and members of the KSU unit formed on 22

Jul.2019 (after a gap of 18 years): “They shared their emotions and predicament the day they found themselves to be in; the SFI had been

reigning as unchallenged masters of UC since almost 2 decades, never allowed anyone else to organize or function; have been verbally

threatened, not physically assaulted yet!; any attempts to question or disagree met with severe threats and attacks, that was the accepted policy;

had to accept slavery, forced to participate in all their party activities, had to yield out of fear; were abused often; were forced to wear red and

white/ black dress the SFI uniform; were forced to pay lot of money too without any account receipts etc; during study tours collected Rs.10,000/

towards the personal expenses of “SFI subcommittee members self-appointed tour managers/in-charge” ; none dared to question; under the

protection afforded by the public and the visual – print media in the background of the stabbing incident, mustered courage to form the KSU unit;

academics is affected badly; many students of UC were willing to join the unit but are terribly apprehensive; contemplating to contest the upcoming

union elections; wished an external agency to monitor the conduct of union elections”

Mr. Eric Stephen 29 years, a student of law, State Secretary of NSU and National Coordinator (youth wing of Congress), and, Mr. Ranin

N. Santhosh , BA ( Pol. Science) student and AISF unit secretary: “ Had a clear idea about the root cause of the UC problems; it was the brute

rule of SFI; Ranin had met with a an accident, seriously injured , thigh and upper arm bones had compound fracture, had steel rod inserts, was

dropped and picked up back from the college daily by his father; in this state was forced by SFI leaders to participate in party programs; had to say

No; was pulled up, abused and beaten up by SFI and DYFI members ( the notorious gang – Aromal, incriminated in attack on police, and Harish );

was literally dragged to be at a meeting organized by CPM against demonetization with Kodiyeri Balakrishnan as the chief guest ; was ruthlessly

made to stand on the fractured limbs for 3-4 hours; pain was unbearable and openly questioned the crude behavior meted out; the response was

another round of thrashing in the “ IDI MURRI” of UC; regarding hostels boys were terribly ill treated, ordered to come out after midnight into the

streets for SFI jobs, sticking party posters, pulling out and fixing flex boards; “Idi Muri” was a reality a store for a variety of weapons to deal with

opponents; have no trust in the recent steps announced to solve problems at UC, SFI flags, banners are all there still, it is a farce; SFI will not let

students boycott classes when educational “bandhs” are called for by student organizations other than SFI like KSU/ ABVP etc.; absentees would

be questioned and dealt with as per “their style”.

Mr. Al Ameen 25, a former B.Com. student 2013-16, Govt. Arts College, Tvm, presently preparing for higher courses: “based on personal

experience, described in vivid detail the wicked crude harsh shocking environment that prevailed at Govt. Arts college which was worse than UC,

the public are not aware ; a strong nexus of faculty- SFI and administrative staff existed; the accepted norm was crush the political opponents

through foul abuse, physical assault and mental persecution; attack anyone who dared to question SFI fiefdom; large scale use of liquor and

narcotic drugs was prevalent in the college; apart from criminal politics college property like furniture are dislodged, robbed and sold to make

money to buy drugs; assuming an upright bold stand against SFI invited slandering, imparting a communal tinge – the best path to defeat one’s

credentials; outsiders, CPM and others have free access, boarding and lodging in the Govt. hostels ; nobody could risk questioning such serious

violations, irregularities; corruption examination malpractices are widespread; faculty who were strict and caught errant were subjected to all

13

possible harassment; even girls are not spared; many students unable to bear the SFI torture leave the college midway; in conduct of union

elections no adherence to rules and regulations laid down by university; SFI is the law; none other than SFI can contest, even if someone else

contemplates, even discuss about participation , nomination etc. news is caught by “SFI in mufti” , promptly transmitted to their masters; rapid

response ensues in the form of rebuke , threat, assault deemed appropriate; repeated complaints submitted to Education Minister and senior UDF

leaders failed to evoke any action, even they seemed helpless; AKGCT the left union of teachers control the entire college, collude with SFI;

classes were never engaged properly, no accountability on the part of teachers; punching machines were tampered resulting in faulty recording of

FN/ AN and timings of entry and exit of teachers and admin staff; wards of CPM leaders, ministers had a peaceful and sound education at private/

autonomous professional institutions , later pursue civil services and enter dream jobs in multinational company like TCS etc; students who are

dragged into SFI are trained for sloganeering, boycott studies, take to drinks, drugs, and groomed to be victims of violence and / serve as suicide

bombers to satiate the political leaders motives” .

Mr. Mussamil A.S and Mr. Ismail K former students of UC, BBA 2014-17, affiliated to Campus Front of India (CFI) : Expressed lack of

democratic freedom and socialism at University College Campus; narrated several instances of brazen attacks on CFI students by SFI, providing

precise dates, year, names of colleges, victims and assailants. “CFI students had faced stiff opposition, harassment and atrocities by SFI a

common phenomenon in many Govt. colleges throughout Kerala. In 2013 CMS college Kottayam M/S Abubecker, Nithin, Anand and Manoj were

beaten up; Nattakom College - M/S Shabeer, Bibin, Hashir were assaulted hit wounded and had to be in ICU; ITI, Ettumanoor, unit president

Naufal initiated a CFI unit there, was beaten up, fell unconscious; In 2014,Calicut university campus, Nasser, State secretary CFI was pulled out of

examination hall, pounded, left injured, lost a chance; In 2019, MSM College, Kayamkulam - Mohammed Shah CFI and unit president put up

festoons in the college met with similar reaction and was admitted to the medical college hospital; Regarding UC Tvm recent murder attempt on

Nikhil by Sivaranjith, the main accused, is never an isolated incident, such acts have become a routine since years; they alleged that “ College

administration is controlled by SFI”; Referring to murder of Abhimanyu a student of Maharaja’s College Ernakulam, the wild allegations holding CFI

guilty was baseless and false”.

Sri.Ralesh Chandran, PG student of MG University shared his “personal experience and harassment in the hands of SFI; he tried to initiate

AIDSO into MG University campus, wanted to stick posters, but was accosted by SFI, threatened; he complained to police but no action; no other

unions KSU, AIDSO etc. could work there; there were no proper guidance in campus regarding education socialization secularism and tolerance;

all campuses were ruled by SFI”.

Ms. Meera J. B.Sc. first Year student, Govt. Arts College,Thiruvananathapuram, shared “the sufferings as a student from day 1; was

compelled to take part in party protests; was insisted on wearing red sari or red skirt; the SFI thrust union membership, snatched mobile phone;

ordered that whenever late should report to SFI union members; she complained to Head of the department who felt helpless; was never allowed

to attend classes; even when teachers are absent SFI prevented them from going home even with the permission from Head of Department;

received daily dose of threats dirty allegations personal comments etc from SFI seniors; felt very much upset and stressed”

Ajmal F. Former student of BA ( Islamic History): “Secured admission to UC BA (IH) under sports quota; forced to take part in protest march,

expressed inability due to a national sport event at Punjab on the same day, arguments followed, cruelly beaten up by SFI union members ;

constantly threatened, could not write S4 examination, repeated ; discontinued and lost opportunity to study; represented to the Chief Minister,

Chancellor, police ; 6 accused were found guilty, but were granted bail immediately, and are now roaming about freely; criminal case is still

pending against the SFI, had no hope of any relief!”

Amal Raveendran , former BA student of University College, “ Attitude of teachers not good, not interested in correcting the prevailing wrongs

in the campus; teachers form a clear nexus with students; it is important that faculty carry out their duties; they should not have political party

affiliation; one can survive only as a “dependent” of a political party, no rebellion or revolt will be tolerated; exam malpractice rampant, teachers do

not care, ignore; yes there is an “IDI MURI” maintained by union unit exclusively for ill treating boys, beating, lynching, breaking hands, legs and

back bone; no one can afford to complain; before the complainant reaches the cantonment police station with a memorandum the police hand out

14

a counter case against you for sexual harassment with “ solid proof- the “ victims” the “UC college female comrades “; girl students are also

manhandled, beaten”.

Mr. Rezim S, former student B.Sc. (Physics) 2011-14 presently employed in Chennai: “ Completed schooling in Sarvodaya ICSC- ISC;

joined UC, 1st

day itself witnessed a strike, clashes between KSU and SFI, a riot ; all 1st

years must participate in “paripadis” under threat, beaten

up if defied; teachers gave attendance to all whether present or not in class; a boy was beaten up for writing the letters “K.S.U” on the classroom

board; On Feb 14, 2012 three students who distributed SIO notice were thrashed cruelly; (family had shops in Tvm. Palayam market and relatives

who could give protection); chose to join SIO union in 2012-13, contested elections, received life threats, they hurled petrol bombs; SFI threatened

female SIO members also; warned that if you contest elections you will not continue here; yet secured 168 votes out of 510 polled out of 3500

electorate; left deeply shocked, scared; “ Idi Muri – procedure “use sticks/ hands wrapped in several layers of cloth for lynching/ beating in “IDI

MURI” , serve raw eggs post thrashing, a special diet to protect the manhandled body; they keep on getting re admissions or graduate in multiple

subjects to remain in the campus for only party activities; criminals are never booked, police too manipulate, interchange the accused/ guilty and

the innocent students, let guilty escape; actual criminal gets into even key central Govt. jobs”.

Abhirami R S, PG student of Mar Ivanios College Dt. Secretary, KSU -- Spoke as a student representative “ many students bring complaints,

mostly from UC; membership in SFI is forcefully thrust on them; permission from SFI union unit a must to go to library and lab classes; forced to

take part in public protests and marches; SFI gets support of local committees; students are constantly chased, followed; SFI union had won the

Mar Ivanios college union elections, during victory celebrations broke the mast of National Flag and put up Che Guevara’s banner, management

objected, SFI created a ruckus in the campus, management acted ; imposed total ban on political student unions in the campus; SFI marched into

hostels premises, tried hoisting SFI flags, student inmates protested, scuffle followed, police were called in and case registered; present grievance

is “because of SFI the basic human rights of students, as a whole, in the campus are denied; UC- SFI manned help desks in front of principal’s

office during new admissions is a feature found only in UC, SFI membership is compulsory, the explanation to those un interested in politics, is that

police and secretariat are so close… so why not join us?; when a senior leader was approached with all the complaints against SFI harassments

he promised that when they come back to power they will suggest shifting of UC to Kariavattom and turn the UC building into a Museum, which will

solve all their problems permanently”.

Anand Y, BA (Journalism and Mass Comm. Mar Ivanios College SFI Student): Alleged that “the college management made fake charges

against 20 (SFI) students just because they won the elections under a particular party banner. Students were detained, disallowed entry into

campus”. He mentioned another instance that “when the SFI protested against the management in an alleged “sexual harassment of a female

student by a male teacher (a member of the clergy too); complaints were not treated properly, neither an inquiry was instituted nor action initiated

against the alleged teacher”; further “admission was denied to candidates holding high ranks in the selection list, just because they were poor

financially; that there was no appellate authority above the management; had approached the Kerala University and the Syndicate issued

necessary directions to the management but found that it was not binding on autonomous colleges”.

Rahib K Y, (a student of Government Law College, Ernakulam) said: The mechanism for awarding internal marks to the students based on

their academic performance has been completely subverted by a section of the teachers, who use it to impose their will on the students. Very

often, the number of working days available falls far short of the minimum prescribed by the university and students are forced to suffer for no fault

of them. Private Colleges inflate the internal marks of their students.

Evidence of Members of the Public, Administrators,

Academics, Political leaders

Shri. K M Shajahan, C DIT, Former Pvt. Secretary to Shri. V.S.Achuthanandan (former CM, Kerala):

“Narrated the incident wherein 2 girls Asmitha Kabeer and Surya were beaten up. Till date whereabouts of guilty are clueless, Govt. is subservient

to human rights violators; A teacher who caught a student for exam malpractice was punished by the students, his vehicle was attacked; Reasons

for such a state of affairs - accused receive powerful party patronage, CPM state leadership does not respond or take a clear stand; SFI is under

15

CPM and used for mafia activities; the opposition parties too never tried to fight this menace; KSUs were militants during 1970s, subsequently SFI

became dominant; opposition when in power connive, collude in silence; it is a serious matter for concern, callousness of Govt. versus Collusion

of Opposition is the cause; main stream political parties should come forward; University College issues- police never took any action, instead

supported the accused and guilty; the well organized strong University College alumni consisting of learned people from all sectors, can intervene,

take up supervisory and monitoring role; Important step-main stream political leadership should decide starting of units of Congress, ABVP,, MSF

in the University College; state presidents of all these student organizations should get admitted to courses in UC; this will send a strong message;

condition of law academy – teachers graduated from law academy join law college and deliberately fail their own students ( vindictive/ partisan

politics?); when UDF comes to power they are not strong and not active (in involving to undo wrongs); A Court Monitoring Commission should be

formed for university college”.

Prof. K. Aravindakshan, former Principal, Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam said that admissions on the closing date of admission are done in a

haphazard and disorganized way as the focus is on filling seats. Students who do not figure in the rank list due to low percentage of marks also get

admission since there will be vacancies in certain departments on the last date of admission. He also mentioned about irregularities in admissions

under sports quota and other special categories.

He also said all electronic equipment like telephones, smart watches etc. should be strictly banned in examination halls. Strict vigil should be

ensured through squads appointed by the University to prevent all sorts of malpractices.

He said semester system has done more harm than good since the syllabus has to be rushed through due to shortage of adequate number of

working days.

He stressed the need for a systematic calendar for college union elections. The college council should prepare guidelines and it should be

published well before the elections. All student organizations should be instructed to strictly adhere to the guidelines. No one should be intimidated

while filing nominations and campaigning. Voting and counting should be under the supervision of senior teachers.

Adv. P.K.Sajeevan, President, Maharaja’s College Alumni Association, Ernakulam said that some former students who later became political

leaders also interfered in the process of admission enabling their followers to get admitted disregarding their eligibility.

Dr. Bushri, faculty member, Physics Department, CUSAT, emphasized the need for a perfect scrutiny by the authorities concerned of all the

admissions made in an academic year.

Dr. Molly Merceline, Former Principal, University College, Thiruvananatha-puram & Dr R Jayaprakash, Former Principal, S N College ,

Kollam, pointed out that certain rare subjects where admissions are not very demanding open up doors for the admission of low rated students and

these students are susceptible to all sorts of antisocial activities instigated by the student union leaders. The University should take serious action

whenever they discover irregularities in admission by flouting rules and regulations. Some teachers also unlawfully interfere in getting admissions

for such students after political and social pressure.

They stated that the system of readmission needs a thorough overhaul as it is misused now. A student can keep on getting repeatedly

any number of times for different programmes. It should be checked by fixing maximum chances for readmission to different programmes in the

same institution. As far as possible, readmissions should be given only on convincing medical grounds.

Dr. M. Jyothiraj, Principal, Govt. College, Pattambi said that college authorities should organize a pre-election debate permitting organizations

to express their views. There should be a committee to be headed by The Principal and one or two representatives from outside to see that no

students are threatened or assaulted during the election process.

Dr. Gladstone, Dr.Biju Lona & Dr. Anil Kumar, Representatives of Govt. College Teachers Organization suggested that an effective

Admission Committee of senior teachers should be formed in all Institutions to oversee the process.

16

A few others deposed including guardians and public men stressed the need for a fool proof system of admission where eligibility as

per rules alone is the only consideration. Last minute admissions should be specially examined by the University officials and persons responsible

for irregularities should be adequately punished. Rank lists should be open for perusal for all concerned and complaints if any properly addressed.

Shri P.T.Thomas MLA said malpractices are liberally followed in exam centres and the authorities concerned are lethargic and indifferent in taking

stringent action against the offenders. He alleged even the support of a few teachers and non-teaching staff to the students who indulge in

malpractices. He suggested the installation of CCTV cameras in Examination halls.

On college union elections he strongly argued for a total systemic change in the conduct of the elections. He suggested that all

students’ organizations should be given equal opportunities in the election process. The student’s union leaders should be asked to follow a code

of conduct prepared by a teacher-students committee headed by the Principal. All candidates should be given an opportunity to present himself on

a common platform called “Meet the Candidates” 2/3 days before the election proper. All sorts of violence should be prevented by a Discipline

Committee consisting of senior teachers and student’s representatives. Principal should collect the list containing names of the leaders of all the

students’ organizations so that they can be contacted in emergencies. Hoardings and flag masts should not be allowed on the campus. When

situations go out of control by any mischance, the Principal should call the police to bring the campus in order. The college council should take

strict action against all sorts of offenders.

On the question of political interference, he said that political leaders should not interfere in the functioning of educational institutions.

Students should not be allowed to feel that they will be protected by the political leaders to whom they show their allegiance. All political leaders

should arrive at a consensus that they will not encourage or protect the students who indulge in violence and indiscipline. Separate places on the

campus may be marked for hoardings, posters etc. He is against total ban of political analysis and study on the campuses. He assured that he

would initiate steps to form a legislative committee to oversee campus activities.

Dr. A.K.Mariamma, Associate Professor, Government Law College, Ernakulam, suggested that the invigilator’s safety and security should be

ensured by the college authorities and stringent action should be taken against the erring teachers connected with the conduct of examinations.

She was critical of the liberal attitude of the college and university authorities in taking stringent punitive action against students indulging in

malpractices.

She quoted instances where she was targeted for being strict as per rules in awarding internal marks. She is quite often isolated by her

own colleagues when she refused to budge to their demands in helping some student leaders.

Dr. Kumaran Chelappurath, Assistant Professor, Government Law College, Kozhikode, suggested that invigilators should be instructed to be

strict in examination halls. He also said that there were instances where the Principal with the help of some teachers changing the internal marks

originally awarded by the assigned teacher. Complaints in this regard sent to the Government and University are not properly heard and action

taken.

Mr. S. Prasanan, a retired senior employee of the Kerala University said the liberal attitude of the University Syndicate in punishing those who

are indulged in exam malpractices is taken advantage of by many who repeat the offence. He said political interference and considerations play a

key role in sending the offenders free with very minor punishment like fine etc. There are employees in the University who are politically

hyperactive who come to the rescue of students and staff indulging in malpractices. They intentionally suppress files and give false information.

Action or no action is quite often on political considerations, he said.

A few parents expressed dissatisfaction in effectively controlling malpractices in examinations as there is laxity on the part of

invigilators. Complaints raised also are not properly attended by the authorities concerned. University also is turning a deaf ear and blind eye to

their complaints.

A teacher from College for Women, Thiruvananthapuram, narrated her personal experiences where she was mentally harassed by students,

colleagues and authorities. She was falsely implicated in many cases and she was denied even natural justice. A College level appellate authority

with Principal as head should be constituted to address grievances on internal assessment.

17

Dr. E. Sreekumaran, Head of the Department of Life Sciences, Calicut University deposed that there should be a systemic change in internal

assessment now vogue in colleges and university departments. Seminars are not properly held, projects correctly evaluated, he said. A very small

section of teachers are not impartial in assessment. They favour some students out of personal and political considerations. A departmental

scrutiny committee should be formed to oversee the academic performance of the students internally.

Security on the campus is inadequate and wardens are not regularly appointed. CUSAT and Calicut university campuses are not safe

zones for most of the students including girls. The students complained that the outsiders include drug peddlers, carriers and criminals. They even

stock lethal weapons in the hostels and create terror in the hostels. Teachers living on the campuses too are open to threats by these antisocial

elements. Use of alcohol also is rampart in hostels, inmates complained.

Mr. Jyothikumar Chamakkala(former Syndicate member, Kerala University) said that outsiders including political & trade union leaders should

enter the campus only with the prior permission of the Principal. They should not feel that they have a right to enter the campus any time they like

during working hours. The Principals should duly recognize without prejudice the positive interference of political leaders when it is offered to help

solving difficult situations.

Shri K. S. Premachandra Kurup, former District Collector, strongly opposed the attitude of political parties in shielding anti-social elements

working on campuses in the State. District authorities also should keep a watch on the campuses especially during nights and holidays so that the

vast expanse of the University Office & Colleges is left open to drug peddlers, alcohol users and criminals. The Police force in the State also

should help the District authorities in keeping the campus clean from anti-social elements.

Mr. K. Rejikumar, R.S.P. State Secretariat member, Mr. Safal Valiyaveedan, K.S.U. District Secretary, Ernakulam, Ms. Sajeena, AIDSO

District Committee Member, Kozhikode, Mr. K. Sreekumar, Section officer, Calicut University and a few others alleged that there is

connivance between student leaders and a section of teachers in granting attendance to those who do not attend classes. At the time of university

examinations, false and fabricated attendance statements are sent to the university by the office staff who are also supporting these student

leaders. If attending classes is strictly ensured, they said a lot of indiscipline can be avoided. The university office staff also help in fabricating false

documents.

Principals and HoDs expressed helplessness in maintaining the percentage of attendance of students in classes as they have to

depend fully for this the office staff and teachers. Teachers are quite irregular in marking attendance of students. The office staff help certain

students by manipulating their attendance to cover the shortage. The University also is very liberal in permitting students to take University

Examinations even if there is shortage of attendance. Complaints against all these illegal activities go unheeded. An attendance monitory

committee in all institutions is the need of the hour, many pointed out.

Dr. S. Raimond (Former Professor of History, University College) was interested in pointing out the flaws and suggesting some remedial

steps: “ Issues in the University College could be resolved by acquiring a special autonomous status; examination malpractice was so common

and teachers who haul up the miscreants are harassed physically and their vehicles damaged; teachers too have strong political affiliation and

collude with SFI members; another serious menace was narcotic drugs being distributed within the campus; young students get easily drawn to

become addicts and become enslaved to SFI, creating a vicious circle”

Prof. Tharyan Mathew, Course Coordinator, Conspi Academy of Management Studies (CAMS), Trivandrum held very strong view on politics

in campuses and shared their comments on National policy on Academic Ethics viz., “academic ambience is lost in many institutions on account of

students indulging in unethical and criminal activities supported by political parties; students union activities be promoted on demographic

principles based on ethics”.

Prof. Anand Viswanathan, Govt College, Chittur, said often judicious teachers are isolated by colleagues in connivance with students & office

staff. Complaints are never heard properly and impartially. Internal factions and feuds among the teacher community itself add to the otherwise

disturbed atmosphere. Impartial teachers are often harassed by false allegations and mental harassment.

18

Dr. Achuth Sankar S Nair, Former member, Kerala State Higher Education Council, suggested that a website be created with the help of

journalists to post wrong doings taking place in campuses across the state so as to have snapshots of ground level picture. It will help to exert

public pressure against such activities. He felt that the existing anti-ragging law is not sufficient to deal with the type of violence taking place in the

campuses presently. He is not against student politics, but the bullying culture prevailing in the campuses should be put an end to. He also said

that the college campus should be closed after a particular time, say 6 pm and proper security should be provided so as to prevent unwanted

elements entering the campus.

Shri V. M. Sudheeran, Former Minister, said very clear and transparent guidelines should be framed for the smooth conduct of College Union

elections. He said banning political activities on campuses is not advisable as communal and militant originations are likely to squeeze in the gaps.

Free and fair elections where opportunities are given to all student organizations should be ensured. Teachers and other staff should not take

sides on the basis of their political convictions. Healthy and democratic debate should be allowed and fight should be ideology based and never

ever on the strength or might of any single organization. The Principal and the staff should play a positive role in correcting the students whenever

they go off the track. He was unhappy on finding certain teachers and staff Unions interfering politically in the College Union activities like Youth

festival, Athletic Meets etc. A Supervisory Committee consisting of senior teachers should be formed to oversee the co and extra-curricular

activities of the students. The Government and the University should take interest in maintaining a cool academic landscape on the campuses.

Interference of political leaders from outside in the campus activities should be prevented. The political parties should arrive at a consensus that

the student organizations will not be treated as their feeder groups and no patronage will be given to them. The students’ grievances should be

properly addressed by the authorities concerned and lack of infrastructural facilities should be rectified so that the students and staff feel at home

on the campuses. A Higher Education Monitory Council could be thought of as a watch dog and whistle blower.

Mr. Babu Divakaran, former Minister, urged that monopoly by any student organization on the campus should not be allowed. All organizations

should be given equal opportunities to participate in all activities on the campus. Physical attacks, harassment of girls, indulging in malpractices,

use of drugs and alcohol etc should be effectively checked. Student hostels also should be under strict vigil especially during nights.

Mr. R.S. Panikker, Former Syndicate Member, University of Calicut was highly critical of political parties interfering in the affairs of students on

the campuses. Total freedom should be given to student organizations to work democratically under the guidance of the Principal and staff. The

teachers in the colleges and university departments should give proper support and guidance to their students in all curricular, co-curricular and

extra-curricular activities.

Representatives of political parties & student organizations suggested that all students should have freedom to work with any organization

they like. Rivalry, physical confrontation etc. should be totally avoided. It should be made mandatory that all students follow the guidelines

designed by the college council from time to time. Students should not be allowed to go out of the campus during class hours to participate in

demonstrations, public protest, rallies etc. The practice of forcing students, especially girls to join rallies and protest marches should be strictly

banned, they said. Political leaders should not enter the campus without the prior permission of the Principal. No seminars, conferences, meetings

should be held without the prior permission of the Principal.

Evidence of Parents cum State / Central Govt. service personnel

Deposition from parents & retired personnel of the state and central government employees, PTA members & others who have had bitter

experiences about the functioning of the University College. 

Following are the facts that were gleamed from their emotional outpourings.

(1) University College reflected its rich tradition and legacy till the eighties of the last century & several students’ fronts coexisted in the

campus with only minor clashes & scuffles occurring during College union elections. Even these disturbances were effectively handled &

normalcy restored in the campus within no time by faculties who in the main remained aloof from the petty political squabbling of their

pupils. Thus as matured elders in the campus they set the bench mark of democratic activities within the campus and calling for the

intervention of the law & order machinery to resolve the issues was an extremely rare measure.

(2) The relatively serene atmosphere within the campus was steadily and craftily subverted by vested political interests over the years later

on. The process is set into motion well before the admission procedure starts. The list of the qualified candidates is scrutinized and their

19

political backgrounds ascertained along with that of their families. Differential treatment awaits the candidates at the "help desk", a ruse to

handle the fresher. Membership of a particular student's front is forced on the unwilling timid candidates. Those who bravely resist this

initial intimidation tactics are singled out for further treatment. Being a novice to the campus or heeding to their guardians advice they fall

in line. The first chapter of this sordid drama is enacted under the very nose of the college authorities often with their silent support and

approval. This reflects a subtle change of attitude of the authorities from the earlier days with disastrous consequences.

(3) Those who are unable to withstand the terror and are unwilling to compromise on their values, prefer to leave the campus. This sets the

stage for the second part of the drama whereby the vacancies arising from such quitting will be filled by spot admissions which are craftily

arranged so that only politically reliable candidate gets admitted.

(4) A few protests and agitations are stage managed to set the stage for College union elections, which happens to be the sole major political

activity around which everything revolves. This seems to be inevitable not only because of the vast political prestige and attendant

mileage it accords to the successful contestants but also it provides uncontrolled and virtually unmonitored access to the university union

coffers.

(5) The subversion mechanisms to derail the democratic elections in the campus works as a well-oiled machinery. Prospective hostile

candidates to union elections are identified initially and pressure tactics are employed. If that 'antidote' isn't effective, then 'sophisticated'

& refined techniques are tested and if the results are still negative then intimidation tactics are explored out of the campus and guardians

of the 'rebels' are warned of the grave consequences. If this litmus test is also covered, emergency steps are taken to prevent filling of the

nominations to the elections.

(6) The college union controls the academic and cultural life of the campus. Gifted, talented and hardworking students are hounded and

pestered so much that they either toe their tormentor’s line like sheep or become silent witnesses to the tragic drama. Such a vice like

grip is an inevitable result of the dialectics of their stand as they fear that creativity will unmask their hypocritical positions on freedom,

democracy, culture and social progress. Being unchallenged within the campuses, emboldens them to even control academic matters.

University examinations are reduced to a farce with invigilators singing to their tune. External examiners are frowned upon by their

internal colleagues and so they turn a blind eye to all malpractices.

Depositions in nutshell

Violence on Campuses:

Public men, political leaders, students, parents, teachers and social workers were of the unanimous view that all sorts of violence on

the campuses should be curbed with an iron hand. Police should be called in when situation goes out of control. Students indulging in violence

should be treated as criminals and should be dismissed from the colleges and departments. Student leaders should not be allowed to wander on

the campus during class hours. The discipline committee should go on rounds at intervals on the campus to prevent students bunking classes.

Use and hiding of lethal weapons on the campus should be brought to the notice of the police authorities. No teacher should be allowed to directly

or indirectly encourage safeguarding the offenders. Physical and mental harassment of any student must be seriously addressed and remedial

action taken. All rooms should be locked after class and office hours. CCTVs at vantage points should be installed, some parents pointed out.

Some teachers complained that they are also threatened by certain student leaders for disregarding their unlawful demands. Complaints against

students indulged in violent activities are sometimes not properly entertained. This liberal attitude shown by the authorities concerned is a boon to

the student leaders in widening criminal activities. Strict vigil should be enforced particularly at the time of admissions, elections, examinations etc.

The unholy nexus of student leaders with certain teachers’ organizations also is a matter of severe concern in this field.

Parents and Social Workers expressed their serious concerns about violence on the campuses. They pointed out the inaction, laziness and

lethargy of some College authorities to effectively interfere in curbing campus violence is making the situation worse. Innocent students are quite

often victimized. Certain student leaders use violence in threatening others who do not dance to their tunes. Suicide attempts, stabbing, use of

explosives etc on the campus draw a frightening picture of certain campuses. Effective checking of the campus and hostels for lethal weapons is

to be done regularly. Forcible collection of money from hapless students, especially girls gives rise to violent confrontations.

College Union Elections:

20

Student organization representatives, political leaders and parents demanded equal opportunities for all of them to participate in the

elections and efforts by rival organizations to threaten or attack each other should be prevented. Teachers should not show any partiality to any

person or organization

Some parents insisted that girl students should be given adequate protection during campaigning and voting. Identity cards should be

insisted on the date of voting. Outsiders should be strictly prevented from interfering in the elections. All attempts to harass or use force should be

seriously dealt with and police intervention if required should be sought in emergencies. Some officers of the university suggested that a university

team may be formed to oversee the conduct of union elections. They also said that the university should update the guidelines for the conduct of

union elections. Officer-bearers once elected should file an affidavit before the Principal that they would work only as per the government and

university guidelines.

Examinations - Conduct and prevention of malpractices:

Strong voice was heard during deposition that both internal and external examinations in Colleges and University departments are not

conducted properly and irregularities are rampant.

Maintenance of Attendance:

Complaints were galore from teachers, students and parents that there is no proper mechanism of marking attendance as a result of

which those who attend classes or not are treated on par. This is a cause for gross indiscipline as the student leaders are least bothered about

attending classes. They spend most of their time on the campuses engaged in political activities.

Ragging:

Freshers in almost all institutions are subjected to ragging in one way or other. Senior students collectively organize freshers’ get-

together under the guise of creating mutual friendship. But often this turns out to be occasions for mentally and physically harassing the freshers.

The college authorities turn a deaf ear and blind eye to this exercise with the result that this is a ‘free-for-all’ event. Many parents complained that

there is no proper monitoring by the Principal or teachers and no restrictions are imposed. They don’t take action against the offenders even

though there is an Anti-Ragging Act. Many institutions do not constitute Anti-Ragging Committees and Anti-Ragging Squad. The rule that

professional counselor for freshers should be appointed also is not adhered to. Instances of ragging in hostels also are rampart, parents

complained. Dedicated cadre of wardens in hostels is not formed in many of the hostels. The toll free helpline no. 1800-180-5522 is not visibly

displayed in the institutions as per rules. Public men, Social workers and Parents expressed their serious concerns in this menace of ragging. The

services of a Counseling team with psychologists should be made available to students whenever necessary. Institutions having a Faculty of

Psychology should make use of their services, many parents suggested.

Interference of outsiders:

Principals and teachers jointly and severally deposed that quite often outsiders in the guise of political leaders forcibly enter the

campus without even seeking permission from the Principal with a view to helping the student organization that owe allegiance to their political

party. Students also complained that such people are inciting violence on the campuses. They even threaten students to join them in

demonstrations, rallies etc. Principals expressed helplessness as it often happens all on a sudden without notice. The outsiders interfere in

admissions, conduct of examinations, union elections etc. uncalled for. Parents complained that those political leaders threaten them also for not

allowing their wards to dance to their tunes.

Faculty members in the Government Law Colleges in Ernakulam and Kozhikode deposed that their hostels are dens of alcoholics, drug

users and criminals. Local trade union leaders also play a pivotal role inciting violence in campuses and hostels.

Shri. V M Sudheeran, Shri Babu Divakaran, & Mr. Jyothikumar Chamakkala (political leaders) were unanimous in their observation that

outsiders including political & trade union leaders should enter the campus only with the prior permission of the Principal. Teachers, staff and

students should not invite outsiders to the campus without the prior permission of the Principal.

21

Overstay of students and staff on campuses and in hostels:

There is a tendency for student leaders to stay in the campuses and hostels after class and office hours. This is a cause of indiscipline

in the atmosphere. Principals are found helpless in curbing this practice as there are no proper security arrangements in campuses and hostels

during nights. Principals complained that the Government and University are not providing enough funds for appointing security personnel on the

campuses and hostels. In some colleges the P.T.A.s provide small funds which are found quite inadequate for security arrangements. Parents are

of the view that combing operations by police should be arranged especially during nights. Government should be made to order regular police

patrolling the campuses and hostels. Parents insisted that all rooms should be safely locked after working hours and they should be opened only

one hour before the work begins. High mast LED lights and CCTVs should be provided all over the campus, they suggested. Compound walls

should have barbed wire fencing too. Regular patrolling by security personnel should be ensured.

Memorials, Hoardings, Posters etc:

Principals and Head of the Departments suggested that some area can be ear marked for small hoardings, billboards, posters etc.

especially during College Union elections.

Political activities of Teachers Organizations:

Complaints are galore from parents and public men that some teachers openly participate in political activities on the campus. The

leftist organizations are in the forefront of rallies, demonstrations etc. when political parties make a call for strike, protests etc. This is promoting

indiscipline on the campuses. Such teachers are sometimes found indirectly instigating student leaders to do similar activities during class hours.

Such teachers even bunk classes and fail to do their duties diligently, regularly and systematically. Very severe action should be taken against

teachers and other staff for participating in political activities on campuses. They should not be allowed to stay on the campus after working hours.

Some teachers instigate certain student leaders to file false cases and baseless complaints against teachers of their rival fractions and this results

in creating ill-will and hatred among the teacher community. Principals often express helplessness in controlling the political activities of the

teachers on the campuses.

P.T.A.s:

Parents, teachers, social workers, political leaders and students spoke in one voice that P.T.A.s should be compulsorily formed in all

institutions. They said there should be clear bylaws and uniformity in the functioning of P.T.A.s. It should regularly meet at least once in every

semester. P.T.A.s should have regular office bearers, proper accounting and auditing of funds. Parents should be given opportunity to file

complaints and voice their concerns. They should be enabled to interact with teachers and Principal whenever necessary. Suggestions and

observations made by the parents should be properly heard and remedial action taken on a time bound basis. The Principals and teachers should

maintain a good rapport with the parents. Group tutors should keep constant touch with parents of those who are found irregular, indifferent to

studies and instrumental to violence and such other activities, many parents and social workers pointed out.

To sum up, it could be seen that there needs to be an overhaul of the existing situation so that the academic atmosphere and

landscape of the campuses are made congenial to academic pursuits. Academia, political leaders, social workers, parents, teachers & authorities

concerned should all play their role effectively and jointly so that the existing maladies can be cured to a large extent.

22

CHAPTER II

ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. What is ailing our College/University Campuses in Kerala?

i) Excessive influence of party politics contributing to extensive abuse, intimidation, bullying and other gruesome human rights

violations in campuses.

Almost everyone who deposed before the Commission narrated instances of gruesome violence in the majority of college campuses in

Kerala. During the inquiry period of the Commission, a case of attempt to commit murder of a student by another student was reported from the

University College, Thiruvananthapuram, on July 12, 2019. Subsequent to this incident, a public protest was held by the students themselves

venting out their frustration on the violations that are taking place in the campuses. This contributed to massive public protest. Thus violence in the

campuses is more discernable in the society to some extent now than earlier. However, the Commission views this incident as a tip of the iceberg.

The overall dismal picture of the campuses in nut shell is this:

There are ‘‘dominant union colleges’ in Kerala. Students Union having allegiance to any one political party take possession of

the campus over the years and do not allow any other students union to function. Once they take over, constant efforts are then taken

to retain their power within the campus. This they do even by resorting to violence. In many of the aided colleges, the management

extends all support to dominant unions and implicitly allows domination of one union over the other.

First year students are often the victims and bullying has become order of the day.

Even before the students who get newly admitted could get the glimpse of the College properly, they are made to line up before the

student union office which is often operated under the guise of ‘help desk’.

Students are forced to pay membership and Magazine subscription fee and thus on the first day itself the students are ‘oriented ‘to

concede whichever Union that has high handedness in the campus. Students are given strong messages in the initial days itself that

differing views will not be entertained and those who wish to complete studies in the campus should go according to the dictates of

the dominant Union.

Students are not allowed to go home after class hours. They are forced to participate in demonstrations even under scorching sun

and even if they have physical difficulties in walking and so on. Smear campaigns are lashed out against girls if they resist any of the

dictates of the dominant Union.

Those who hold a different ideology than that of the Union are often intimidated in the beginning and if they still dare to question the

Union they are physically assaulted and isolated, the situation force many students to discontinue their studies.

In several colleges the allotted college union rooms have been converted by SFI into torture rooms called ‘Idi Muri’.

University College and Govt. Arts College, Thiruvananthapuram, Govt. College, Madappally are a few examples.

In many colleges students stay in the union offices overnight.

First year students are not allowed to go to canteen, library and are often treated as animals to be droved. Girls having close

allegiance to these Unions also support the misdeeds of the boys in every way. First year students feel terribly insecure, upset and

helpless. And they find no one to turn for help.

Concocted attempts prevail in campuses to expel students who do not fall in line with the norms dictated by the dominant Union.

Situations in colleges are turned nightmare for students and their parents alike.

23

Teachers who take steps to raise voice against the atrocities are often cornered and victimized. This makes other teachers to be mute

spectators to all the violations that happen in the campuses.

Politicians, whoever is in power use the unions for their selfish and nefarious motives.

Many colleges have become epicenters of hooliganism.

Some of the college campuses are expansively decorated with hoardings and flags which gives the impression of political party

offices.

ii) Academics is severely compromised

Students are forcefully dragged out of their classes by dominant unions for the purpose of making them unwilling participants in rallies

and programmes of Political leaders without their informed consent. Students are often not even told as to which programme they are

taken to. Sometimes students are taken to the programmes of Ministers merely to fill the halls

Attendances in classes are at times recorded by the Union and not the teachers.

Results are often delayed and exams are often conducted using bizarre schedule.

Since regular classes are not held often, only those students who can afford to go for private tuitions are able to do well in studies.

After seeing the dismal condition in colleges, many parents felt that they should have opted for distance education rather than

sending their wards to the regular colleges.

Class hours are lost for no valid reasons.

iii) No proper grievance redress mechanism

PTA is defunct in all most all colleges

The students and the parents face severe helpless condition as there are no effective mechanisms laid out in the Colleges to redress

the grievances.

Though the UGC and the relevant laws mandates that existence of Anti Ragging cell, Women’s Cell and so on are to be widely made

known to the students, students have no clue whether these cells are existing in their colleges.

The Commission finds that there are severe human rights violations that are happening in the College. However, no serious

concerted efforts are taken from any quarters to mitigate the same. Though many of the disorderly conduct of the students falls within

the scope of the Kerala prohibition of Ragging Act 1998, no effective steps are taken in the campuses to implement the Act.

The atmosphere prevailing in college campuses in Kerala has deteriorated enough to drive young scholars even to take

extreme steps of attempting to commit suicide, or discontinuation of studies. The situation needs to be arrested without further delay.

The above facts have clearly come out in the evidence to which we have already referred. So on point 1 of the Points of Reference

our finding is that the college and university campuses in Kerala are suffering from the above ailments. The major factor influencing

such degradation is that the dominant student unions with the connivance of teachers and political leaders affiliated to their political

philosophy do not permit other student unions to function and commit various atrocities and human right violations to deny the right to

function.

2. Flip flop in the formation and working of College Student Unions

All who deposed before the Commission stated that the democratic process within the campuses has been derailed and it has even

paralyzed the thought process of the students.

24

Few students attached to the SIO and FMI Fraternity Movement in India shared their experience in trying to make inroads to the

University college campus, SD College, Alappuzha, and so on. Even a banner on Anti Ragging Campaign irked the dominant union of

the campus. Many SIO students were dragged to the ‘Idimuri’ and were assaulted.

Though they wish to, students are scared to come out in open and vote against the dominant union. Even teachers play their part and

silently allow subverting all the procedures connected with elections.

Thus the Commission finds on point number 2 of the of the Points of Reference, the formation and working of student unions do not

adhere to the election rules and regulations laid down by the University authorities. The rules are sabotaged to serve the interest of

the dominant union in the campus.

3. Manipulations in the Admission to courses and conduct of examinations:

Many confided to the Commission that examination related malpractices and mass copying are widespread in many colleges

including the University College. The commission doesn't find any reason to disbelieve such evidences.

The answer sheets are not collected in a timely manner by the respective Universities and this paves way for wide spread

malpractices.

The insiders assume a non co -operative and defiant postures to the external invigilators. Half hearted approach is taken during the

surprise inspections carried out by the squad formed by the University.

Admissions are manipulated quite often. The opportunity for spot admissions is misused badly to get admission to those students who

can associate with the dominant union. Admissions in sports quota are made in a highly irregular manner.

It is alleged by the students that in many colleges like the Govt. Law College, Ernakulam, internal mark system is badly misused by

teachers to intimidate students.

In the light of the above mentioned evidence placed before us which appeared to be genuine the Commission finds that the procedures for

admission of students, conduct of examinations, maintenance of daily attendance registers, internal assessment; records of organization of

academic / socio-cultural programmes, seminars, workshops and so on by various departments in the Colleges are not transparent and as per

university regulations.

4. Other grievances brought to the notice of the Commission by the students

Lack of adequate number of hostels especially ladies hostel in Law College, Ernakulam. The college has approximately 800 students

and the capacity of the hostel is just 40.Many girl students are finding it extremely difficult to find suitable places for their stay.

Admission to the hostels in Cochin University is done without following any norms.

Mark lists are not issued through on line and this creates lots of confusion and students are unable to apply for scholarships and so

on due to the delay in getting the mark list.

Many times the results of revaluation of papers are not announced prior to the supplementary examinations and this creates extreme

confusions to the students.

We hope that the concerned authorities will look into these matters and take necessary action to redress the aforesaid grievances

25

CHAPTER III

RECOMMENDATIONS

Tranquility and freedom from fear within the campus are sine quo non for any higher education institution to attain excellence.

Unfortunately our campuses do not have both for almost a decade now. However no serious efforts were taken by Governments to set right things

but kept on subtly supporting the hooliganism in the campus for its petty political gains. The situation cannot continue like this anymore.

The academic atmosphere in the campuses has degenerated and no healthy, meaningful, constructive and intellectual deliberations

take place in any of the campuses. Instead, the activities are restricted to fostering their sponsoring political parties by performing strikes, agitation,

vandalism and violence. To inflate the mass participation in such activities the students unions forcibly rope-in the uninterested and apolitical

students, thereby denying their right to educational activities. Even those, who have political affiliation, are denied of the right to hold and express

their ideological differences, thereby igniting unrest and chaos in campus. Hence it is recommended to curb the student’s union activities in the

present form. This can be made possible by easing out the patronage extended to the students unions by major political parties and creating an

ambience in the campuses for the students to have diverging ideologies and political views. Full freedom is to be ensured to all students unions to

function and contest in elections without fear or threats or violence either physical or mental

It is often voiced that the staff, who should be role models to students, indulge in petty political activities in the campus for favours from

their political masters. The unholy nexus of the political unions of staff, both teaching and non-teaching, with the student leaders often ignite,

amplify and augment unrest, strikes as well as violence in the campus. Hence the political activities of the staff unions within the campus should be

summarily stopped and Teachers and employees should be put under strict surveillance for violation of service and conduct rules. Stringent action

should be taken by the authorities concerned against those who are involved in such activities.

In our considered opinion, the rapid spread of the tentacles of criminality in the campuses can only be effectively countered and

stemmed by restoring democratic style of functioning which prevailed in the institutions earlier and moreover providing ever expanding avenues to

practice democracy in campus life.

This enquiry commission will find its tasks unaccomplished if it doesn’t delve into the root cause of the cancerous spread of criminality

in the campus. The atmosphere in the campus is certainly not insulated from the developments of the society of which it is an inalienable part. We

witness the gradual and steady erosion of the democratic values and practices. Tolerance to opposition and debate has been reduced virtually to

zero. Critical opinions are unwelcome and are forcibly suppressed. Truth and objectivity becomes the first casualty of such a regimented state of

affairs. Further flowering and maturing of creative thoughts and ideas are nipped in the bud, and consequently it harms the general progress of the

society

Interventions by the Government in the following lines are to be carried out on an immediate basis.

1. The Commission finds that the existing legal provisions are not sufficient to effectively combat violence that erupts more frequently in

the campuses now than ever before. The Kerala Anti Ragging Act,1998, the major law applicable to campuses which was brought into

existence by the Government of Kerala some 20 years ago, basically to deal with offences committed in the name of ragging , do not

effectively address the unrest that currently prevail in our campuses. The acts of violence do not fit in the restricted definition of

‘ragging’ of the said Act. Hence the said Act has to be amended to incorporate provisions to deal with the present situation on an

urgent basis.

26

2. The contemplated amendment statute should also a have a provision for creating a State level grievance redress body, an

Ombudsman for Campus, with enough powers to monitor the implementation of the said Act and also to redress the complaints of

approximately 3Lakhs student community in Kerala

3. An Internal Committee (IC), in line with the provisions in the Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal)

Act, has to be set up in all colleges to address the sexual harassment issues of female students.

4. A platform / forum should be created on the campus with the students and teachers which could frequently meet and deliberate on the

functioning of the Institution. This may help the students to consider themselves as a stake holder having bigger responsibility.

5. A Counseling Unit consisting of qualified psychologists, men and women should be formed in all institutions to address the issues

causing mental stress and tension to students.

6. The campus life must be governed by a code of conduct so as to curb violence, unrest and consequential loss of regular teaching

hours in the campus and to provide a learning ambience. The   lost teaching days must be compensated on Saturday/holidays.

Wandering in the campus and extracurricular activities within the campus should not be allowed after 5 pm without the permission from

the Principal.

7. Forcible driving out of students from class rooms to join the student groups for activities sponsored by student unions and political

parties during class hours be banned.

8. The campuses are widely defaced by posters, writings, hoardings etc. This should be stopped. The student unions may be permitted to

put up posters, bills or notices on a specified space allotted for the purpose.

9. Student amenities such as toilets, restrooms and canteen are woefully lacking in most of the campuses. Since this leads to many

unhealthy practices, immediate attention should be given to provide and improve such facilities.

10. The student Unions should not be permitted to collect compulsory monetary contributions from the students in the campus.

11. Elections to college unions must be supervised and scrutinized by the University. Free, fair and democratic nature of elections must be

ensured. Students with criminal background should not be allowed to contest.

12. Declaration of results of college union Elections as unopposed should be scrutinized by the University, and when there are complaints

against such elections. If complaints are found genuine the election should not be approved. Rules in this regard should be formulated

by the University.

13. It has been observed that some of the campuses are reigned by unruly, disrespectful student groups who have secured admission

through dubious means. Hence admissions to all academic programmes should be regulated by the University directly.

14. Spot admission of students should not be entrusted to the college. Such admissions should be done by the University itself. Admission

to seats under the sports quota may be monitored and regulated by the University after ensuring the genuineness of the supporting

Certificates of the candidates.

27

15. The system of re-admission is often misused and manipulated in such a way that some students can continue in the campus even after

the termination of the stipulated period of a course. Hence stringent rules are to be formulated for completing the course on a regular

basis within a stipulated period.

16. Inter-collegiate transfer facility is widely used for illegitimate entrance to certain campuses. Such transfers must be made on the basis

of marks scored by the lowest rank holder in the rank list for admission to a particular course. That is, a student who seeks this mode

should not have marks lesser than that of the lowest rank holder in the ranked list prepared for admission to that particular course.

17. Awarding of internal marks should be effected through a transparent process. The marks awarded by the College may be regulated by

the University in tune with the marks scored by the candidates in the written examination conducted by the University.

18. Tutorial system is to be reintroduced and guardians should be informed of the attendance, behavior and performance at tests and

examinations of the students. The Tutors should maintain a regular rapport with the guardians.

19. CCTV should be provided in all examination halls to prevent malpractices, as per UGC guidelines.

20. University Youth Festivals are to be conducted by the union as at present under overall supervision of teachers nominated by the

University.

21. Every student should wear his/her ID card on the campus and it should be produced whenever asked for.

22. Proper accounting and auditing of answer books and question papers must be done by the University. Answer books must be sent to

the University immediately after each session of examination. Service of the postal department can be sought in this regard.

23. Invigilators for final semester University examinations in a particular centre must be drawn from neighbouring colleges. Malpractices in

examinations can thus be considerably reduced.

24. Anti-ragging rules of the UGC must be strictly implemented on the campus.

25. The lack of accommodation to girl students has been a long-standing problem in the capital city.  Many complaints have been raised in

this regard. For providing better residential facilities to the girl students, the present Govt . College Hostel for Men at Palayam may be

converted to a Ladies hostel. Men students can be accommodated elsewhere, providing institutional bus service if necessary.

26. Students involving in criminal activities should be expelled from the hostel and the campus as well as hostels made free of drug abuse.

This should be enforced by appointing regular wardens and by periodic inspections.

27. Govt. /University hostels across the state are poorly managed, and are houses of disrespect and indiscipline. Unauthorized occupancy

and over-stay of students even after the completion of the course has become the routine practice. Hence, admission, maintenance,

upkeep and discipline must urgently be streamlined and enforced.

28. PTA, Students Grievance Cell, Anti-Ragging Cell, Women's Cell should be made more vibrant and effective.

29. Appointment of Vice Chancellors and Principals should be purely on merit and strictly as per UGC guidelines.

28

30. Admission to the student hostels of Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) should be monitored and regulated by a

committee headed by the VC, registrar and other high officials of the University, so as to prevent malpractices in allocating hostel

accommodation, indulged in by some vested interests.

31. Periodically surprise checks should be conducted in the hostels to prevent the growth of unhealthy practices which endanger the

peaceful atmosphere of the campus.

32. To retain the academic atmosphere and to forestall the brewing of unnecessary tension between the student groups in the campus no

organizations shall be permitted to erect memorials, flag staffs, or symbols within or at the entrances.

29

Conclusion

These recommendations are made in the light of facts revealed in the evidence tendered by individuals and the opinions and

suggestions made by academics, and former principals and teachers who had actual experience of what is going on in the campuses and we do

not claim it to be exhaustive. However the commission is of the strong view that the implementation of these recommendations will go a long way

to restore academic atmosphere in university and college campuses and make the campus free from violence and human rights violations. It will

also compel the student unions to function in a democratic manner which ultimately may bring peace and tranquility in the campus.

Finally we express our deep sense of gratitude to all those who cooperated with us and enabled us to submit this report within the

scheduled time frame.

30

Justice P.K. Shamsuddin

(Former Judge, High Court of Kerala) - Chairman

Members

Prof. S. Varghese

(Former Member, State Human Rights Commission

& Principal, University College, Thiruvananthapuram)

Dr V. Thankamani

(Former Syndicate Member & Head,

Dept. of Bio-Technology, University of Kerala)

Adv. J. Sandhya

(Former Member, Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights)

Prof. A.G.George

(Former Professor of English, University College, Thiruvananthapuram)

Member Secretary

Annexures

(a) List of people who made depositions

Sl.No. Name Designation/ office/ status/ affiliation

1. Prof. K. Aravindakshan Former Principal, Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam

2. Dr. M. Jyothiraj Principal, Government College, Pattambi

3. Adv. P.K.Sajeevan President, Maharaja’s College Alumni Association, Ernakulam

4. Dr. Bushri Faculty member, Physics department, CUSAT

5. Shri. P.T.Thomas MLA

6. Dr. Mariamma A.K Associate Professor, Government Law College, Ernakulam

7. Dr. Kumaran Chelappurath Assistant Professor, Government Law College, Kozhikode

8. Mr. K. Ravikumar R.S.P. State Secretariat member

31

9. Mr. Safal Valiyaveedan K.S.U. District Secretary, Ernakulam

10. Ms. Sajeena AIDSO District Committee Member, Kozhikode

11. Mr. K. Sreekumar Section officer, Calicut University

12. Dr. E. Sreekumaran HoD, Life Sciences, Calicut University

13. Mr. R.S. Panikker Former Syndicate Member, University of Calicut

14. Prof. Tharyan Mathew Course Coordinator, Conspi Academy of Management Studies

15. Sri. Jyothikumar Chamakala KPCC Gen.Secy., Former Syndicate member KU

16. Sri. Prasanan S Retd. Kerala University staff

17. Sri, Sarajan P Govt. Tech. Edn. staff

18. Sri.Thankappan A State Police service

19. Mr. Shahazad M K Leader, AIDSO

20. Mr. Shyju A , State Vice President AIDSO

21. Mr. Rahul R Member AIDSO

22. Mr. Nishad A R Youth Congress

23. Sri. Premachandra Kurup Dt. Collector Retd.

24. Sri. Vijayakumar K G Senior Auditor

25. Prof. Mohankumar C Dy. Director DCE

26. Mr. Venugopal AG’s Office

27. Dr. Sindhu T K Faculty Govt. Women’s College, TVM

28. Dr. N. NarayanaPillai Emeritus Prof. Amrita University

29. Mr. Mohanan V KSFE Dy. Mgr.Retd.

30. Mr.Najeeb N A Dt. Secy. SIO

31. Mr.Anand Y Student Mar Ivanios College, Tvm ( SFI)

32. Mr.Suresh Kumar C K KU staff

33. Mr. Gopakumar N Door Darsan Staff

34. Mr.Jayakrishnan R Student FMN College Kollam

32

35. Mr. Emil P S Old student UC ( AIDSO)

36. Prof. Anand Viswanathan Govt. College Chittoor

37. Ms. NikhilaSathesan Student UC

38. Dr. Gladstone R S College Teachers Organisation

39. Dr. Biju Lona College Teachers Organisation

40. Dr. Anilkumar College Teachers Organisation

41. Sri. V M Sudheeran Former KPCC President, Minister, MP

42. Mr. Ralesh Chandran MG University , PG student ( AIDSO)

43. Mr. Jayaprakash R Former Principal SN College Kollam, Member Higher Edn. Council

44. Mr. Rajesh R V Youth Congress

45. Ms. Meera J Govt. Arts College Tvm

46. Dr. G. Jayakumar Former UC student, Free lance Journalist

47. Sri. Babu Divakaran Former Minister Kerala, UC old student

48. Dr. Molly Marceline Retd. Principal UC

49. Mr. Ajmal F. Former UC student

50. Mr.Tajuddin A S Former KUTO, KU Secy.

51. Mr. Amal Ravindran Former UC student

52. Mr.Rezim S Former UC student (SIO)

53. Adv. Shajahan Former PS to CM Kerala, C DIT, Org. Anti-Corruption Council

54. Ms. Abhirami R S KSU Dt. Secy. PG student Mar Ivanios College TVM

55. Mr. Ramu Parent

56. Mr. Prakash O T KU staff

57. Mr. SukumaranThampi N KU staff ( Retd.), Socio cultural activist

58. Dr. Mrs. Prasannakumari Former UC student, Social worker, teacher, Member Gandhi

SmarakaNidhi

59. Adv. Anto Marcelene Former UC student, Congress fellow traveller

60. Sri. Harikumara Menon KU staff Retd.

33

61. Aiswarya J, UC, Member of KSU

62. Amal PT, UC, Member of KSU

63. Amal Chandra UC, Member of KSU

64. Dr. S. Raimon Former Professor of History, University College

65. Sri. Sundaresan Kodikunnil, EC Member, SC ST Movement

66. C K Kuttappan EC Member, SC ST Movement

67. Ms.Arya Abhedanand, Student, S R Medical College

68. Mr.Siddharth, Student, S R Medical College

69. Mithun Babu S Student, S R Medical College

70. Swathi Krishna Student, S R Medical College

71. Mr. Eric Stephen , Students, NSU State Secy.

72. Mr.Ranin Santhosh And AISF Union Secy.

73. Mr. Al Ameen Former student, Govt. Arts College Tvm

74. Dr. Gopalakrishnan Faculty KU

75. Mr. Mussamil A S Former UC student, (Campus Front of India)

76. Mr. Ismail K Former UC student, (Campus Front of India)

77. Mr. Hardil A BSc student of University College

78. Ms.Salwa Abdulkader BA Political Science (2016-19), College, Madappally, Kozhikode

79. Mr.Mushad Ahmed Former student of University College, BA (Islamic History) 2003-06

80. Mr.Rahib K Y Government Law College Ernakulam

81. Dr Achuth Sankar S Nair Former member, Kerala State Higher Education Council

82. Dr.Aruna Gopala Krishnan

83. Mr Sreeneelakantan Sadasivan Former Teacher,Christ College

84. Prof.Sunil Jose Asst Prof, St Thomas College, Thrissur

85. Mr. Viju MJ Calicut University

34

86. Prof.Francis Kalathunkal ………………………

87. Dr Anto P.Varghese,

88. Prof. Koshy Ninan, Former Principal, Bishop Moore College, Mavelikkara

89. Mr. Nithin George --------------------------------

90. Dr. Matthew V ----------------------------------

91. Ms.Latha Sakhya -------------------------------------

92. Dr. Shameem TKM Engineering College, Kollam

Details of some of the witnesses are withheld as per request.

(b) News clippings

35

(c) Data on education

36

37

38

39

40