Jeff Cheng #42028741Thania Soetandar #43120231 Jinil Kim #43151280

http://group38.wordpress.com

DECO1100ASSIGNMENT TWO: Interaction

Table Of ContentIntroduction...................................................................................................................................................................................3

Deliverables................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Concept Maps.................................................................................................................................................................................4

Spatial Map #1.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4

Dimensional Map #1..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Dimensional Map #2..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

Concept Portfolio.........................................................................................................................................................................8

Under 15 Seconds......................................................................................................................................................................................... 0

Word-Scotch................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

The Elevator.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2

Ghost Basher................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3

Be Careful Your Mouth.................................................................................................................................................................................. 4

Number Baseball........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Dragon Balloon.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

Water Dragon................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7

Pencil Dropper.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8

Shoes Twister................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9

Jump Jump.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10

Following Pictures....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11

Criteria evaluation framework...............................................................................................................................................0

Under 15 Seconds......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Word-Scotch................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2

The Elevator.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3

Ghost Basher................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4

Be Careful Your Mouth.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5

Number Baseball........................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Dragon Balloon.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7

Water Dragon................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8

Pencil Dropper.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

Shoes Twister.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10

Jump Jump.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11

Following Pictures....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

User evaluation report............................................................................................................................................................13

Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................................................14

IntroductionThe overall goal for this project was to design, develop and construct a packaged game which meet the criterions of that it must be fun to play, must engage human senses other than visual, has to be challenging and enabling the player to develop skills each time the game is played by players. Additionally the game would also have to provoke reflections, self-sufficient & self-explanatory, be original and reproducible.

As for the final game concept that we have developed, it has been directly meeting the requirements of the criteria relating back to the brief. With the concept being original in design, “Number Baseball” is the game that we have developed. It’s a game that allows the players to engage senses other than just the sight and fun to play. As well as that this game has allowed the players to challenge and compete in teams of 2 or more, also to develop skills and strategies every time the player plays it.

Deliverables In order to achieve above requirements for the game, the following must be delivered:

3 concept maps to frame the game's concept portfolio;

12 distinct game design concepts, all of which must include:

o A name;

o Thumbnail sketch/picture and;

o A unique back-of-the-box description so games can be differentiated.

A framework of criteria for evaluating at least 5 game concepts and;

User feedback of the project so that the final product can be improved.

Concept Maps

Spatial Map #1

[Explanation]

Dimensional Map #1

Key: brown – our 12 games, black – random 38 games

We assessed our games based on four aspects on the first Organic Map that we have done. This is related to our criteria that meets the requirement of the games. The first aspect is based on the Key Success needed to win the game which could be either skill or luck. Some games involve skills of actually playing the game and the knowledge within the game to actually win such as sports. Most sports game requires the players to know and learn beforehand the rules and extra practice in order to win.

On the contrary, some games may rely on fully luck, such as games that mostly involve dice and/or drinking games. The scale is then taken into consideration on how we are going to shape our game according to our set of standards. The second aspect that we assessed our game on is the Form and involvement of the game. There are different forms of game that can make a game fun, for our scale we primarily divided it into intangible and physical.

From there we fit all of the 50 random games including 12 of our own concept games into the four quadrants on the map to see where it sits.

From this organic map we learned a new method that we can apply to construct our game which is the design map. This skill has

been very useful from the beginning of project 2 in building and making games from scratch. This skill is ideally useful especially as

more ideas are retrieved.

Dimensional Map #2

Key: brown – our 12 games, black – random 38 games

The same list of games was populated again into another organic map. The aspects were chosen from the environment the game

can be played for and what kind of strategy that suits this whole game.

Fast Response and Logical thinking was undertaken into strategy and the environments chosen were silent and crowd pleasing.

Concept Portfolio

Under 15 Seconds

Word-Scotch

The Elevator

Ghost Basher

Be Careful Your Mouth

Number Baseball

Dragon Balloon

Water Dragon

Pencil Dropper

Shoes Twister

Jump Jump

Following Pictures

Criteria evaluation framework The criteria evaluation frame work for evaluating our concepts. So we made our own framework of criteria for evaluating our different concepts. All 12 different games will get the result each. With the result, we will show the result of an analysis of our four concepts (including our final concept) against the criteria.

[Template]

Under 15 Seconds Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke Reflection

The game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively

Fully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

Synthesis

The game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Word-Scotch Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke Reflection

The game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short. More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively

Fully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

Synthesis

The game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

The Elevator Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Ghost Basher Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Be Careful Your Mouth Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Number Baseball Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively

Fully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Dragon Balloon

Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

Balance

Broken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Water Dragon

Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Pencil Dropper Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

Balance

Broken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Shoes Twister Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

BalanceBroken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Jump Jump Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

Balance

Broken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Following Pictures Criteria Fail Pass Distinction High distinction

EngageNon-Visual Sense

Game relies on players visual abilities heavily

Engage sensesother than sight

Engage playersbodies physically

Engage players bodies physically and mentally

Provoke ReflectionThe game does not reflect any obvious aspect of use in the professional field

Reflects of some general aspect of professional practice

Relate to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Highly related to professional dilemmas from project1 (communication, collaboration, ambition, professionalism)

Game FlowMany awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A lot of exceptions to rules.

Some awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Some exceptions to rules.

A few awkward moments and unneeded procedures. A few exceptions to rules.

No awkward moments and unneeded procedures. Very little if any exceptions to rules.

Play Time

The game is toolong or too short.Less than 1 min ormore than 30 min

The game is ratherlong or short.More than 3 min orless than 25 min.

The game is just a little too long or short.More than 5 min orLess than 20 min.

The game lengthis appropriate. Approximately10-15 min

Self SufficientSelf-Explanatory

The game relies on external requirements.

Some completeand self-containing

Complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusivelyFully complete and explains itself, fulfilling inclusively (title, intent, instructions, rules, equipment)

Clarity

Game rules and instructions are very unclear. Players have difficulties in following and understanding the game. Very awkward board design.

Somewhat unclear game rules and instructions. Players have some difficulties in following and understanding the game. Board design is a little awkward.

Somewhat understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to somewhat follow and understand the game. Board design is a little streamlined.

Very understandable rules and instructions. Players are able to fully follow and understand the game. Board design is very streamlined.

Balance

Broken game mechanics, very imbalanced. Unfair game with luck being too significant.

Somewhat broken game mechanics, slightly imbalanced. Somewhat unfair game with luck being somewhat significant but few are appropriate.

Little loopholes in game mechanics. Slightly balanced game. Luck elements are appropriate but few are significant.

Very balanced game that is fair for all players. No loopholes. Any/all luck elements are appropriate in their significance.

Physical & Reproducible

Game has no manufacturable parts or would be too difficult to manufacture.

It is possible to make two copies of the game within self-containing packaging

The game is reproducible within self-containing package

The game is marketable and memorable not only is it reproducible but it could likely to be an actual mass produced game

SynthesisThe game mechanics and theme are very mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat mismatched and do not complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme are somewhat fit and complement each other.

The game mechanics and theme strongly complement each other.

Enjoyable

No emotional connection or tension in the game at all. Not very interesting. The game was not fun.

Few emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat uninteresting. The game was rarely fun.

Some emotional connection or tension in the game. Somewhat interesting. The game was fun but still had areas that were lacking.

High emotional connection or tension in the game. Very interesting. The game was fun and engages the players.

Final Concept

User evaluation reportUser evaluation report:

Write up the series of events you conducted to obtain user feedback on your project, specifying the actual feedback you received and explaining how that was (or wasn’t) incorporated into your final product (approx. 3 pages).

Series of events conducted to obtain user feedback

Specifying the actual feedback received

Explaining how it was or wasn’t useful and utilised

ConclusionI will finish this by tonight [Jeff]

APPENDIX