Planning, design, implementation and operation of the Yichang BRT corridor and related BRT corridor improvements

Karl Fjellstrom, Regional DirectorEast & Southeast Asia, ITDP24 September 2015

Yichang• Central China, site of

Three Gorges Dam, second largest city in Hubei Province, after Wuhan

• Population around 4 million (1.5m urban area)

• ADB loan funded

• International bid won by ITDP China in 2012 for planning & design

• Opened 15 July 2015

ITDP in East & Southeast Asia• ITDP’s China office has had success in the Asian region in preparing conceptual designs for

‘urban development demonstration corridors’ which then inspire cities to take action. Regional cities where ITDP-China has carried out BRT corridor conceptual designs include:

1. Guangzhou ,China (implemented & operational, http://www.worldbrt.net/en/cities/guangzhou.aspx)

2. Lanzhou, China (implemented and operational, http://www.worldbrt.net/en/cities/lanzhou.aspx)

3. Yichang, China (opened 15 July 2015, http://itdp-china.org/en/program/brt)

4. Vientiane, Laos PDR (approved in March 2015 by ADB Board and now the subject of an approximately $100 million financing package (see http://itdp-china.org/en/feature/vtbrtmar15, and the ADB Press Release at http://www.adb.org/news/adb-help-lao-pdr-s-vientiane-set-sustainable-transport-system-0?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts)

5. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia (study completed 2011; BRT approved by government in 2015).

6. Manila, Philippines (BRT preliminary design for EDSA, Makati, other corridors, in 2015).

7. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (completed 2012, awaiting financing approval by government).

8. Johor Bahru, Malaysia (completed 2013 and not yet approved for implementation).

9. Wuhan, Tianjin, Jiuquan (not yet implemented).

Brief overview of process applied by ITDP China in several cities

• Conceptual / preliminary design (6-9 months, ~$300,000-600,000)

• Surveys & data collection• Corridor selection• Modelling and operations• Roads, intersections, traffic impact

analysis• Stations – locations, dimensions,

configuration, operation, architecture

• Costings; Modal integration• Consultation & outreach

• Engineering design (6-9 months, ~3% of infrastructure cost)

• Surveys & data collection• Pipes and utilities• Bidding, design modifications, final

costings, etc.

• Construction (12-24 months, including testing/trials)

• Contracting• Construction of system

components• Traffic management during

construction• ITS elements, including control

center• Depot facilities (if needed)

• Parallel with construction• Bidding procedures• Final operational design• Institutional set-up• Contracting for operations• Bus procurement• Communications & outreach

• Operation

Yichang timeline• April 2012: Yichang Mayor, Party

Secretary and senior officials visit the Guangzhou BRT

• June-December 2012: ITDP-China BRT conceptual design study carried out as ADB PPTA

• 2013 - engineering design

• 25 February 2014 –commencement of construction

• 15 July 2015 – commencement of operation (13km, 22 stations phase 1)

• October 2015 – commencement of operation (7km, 11 stns)

• March 2016 – commencement of operation (3km, 4 stations)

Key ITDP staff & consultants in the Yichang project; ITDP fundersStaff & consultants:• Xiaomei Duan• Karl Fjellstrom• Derek Trusler• Ma Wenxuan• Remi Jeanneret• Xianyuan Zhu• Pedro Szasz• Shaokun Liu• Li Wei• Ren Bin

• Shanshan Li• Xianwei Liu• Chen Dan• Others

Funders:• Asian Development Bank• Climateworks Foundation• Rockefeller Brothers Fund• Oak Foundation• Grantham Foundation

Guangzhou – before BRT, Gangding

Guangzhou, after BRT, Gangding (3 substops)

BRT station at Tangxia – 3 substops

23km, 37 stations

40m-50m wide, north

part 24m wide

Trunk & feeder vs direct-service operations. The Yichang BRT, like Guangzhou, does not require any transfer terminals, hubs, or interchanges

Direct-service operations

Trunk & feeder operations

City overtaking lanes &

substops > 75% of

stns

>1 stopping

area >75% of

stations

design

capacity*

>1 stopping

area per

substop

throughput

(pphpd)

year of

throughput

count

Bogota Yes No HIGH No 37,700 2013

Guangzhou Yes Yes HIGH Yes 27,400 2014

Lima Yes No HIGH No 13,950 2011

Cali Yes No HIGH No 11,100 2013

Xiamen No No LOW 8,360 2012

Brisbane Yes Yes HIGH Yes 7,700 2014

Mexico City No Yes MEDIUM 7,550 2013

Zhengzhou No Yes MEDIUM 7,230 2014

Urumqi No Yes MEDIUM 6,950 2013

Chengdu No YES MEDIUM 6,650 2014

Lanzhou Yes Yes HIGH Yes 6,550 2013

Quito No No LOW 6,000 2008

Yichang Yes Yes HIGH Yes 5,400 2015

Jakarta No No LOW 3,400 2013

Beijing No No LOW 2,750 2013

Changzhou No No LOW 2,650 2013

Jinan No No LOW 2,050 2014

Leon No No LOW 1,950 2013

Ahmedabad No No LOW 1,200 2012

Bangkok No No LOW 1,200 2011

Nantes No No LOW 1,200 2011

Paris No No LOW 1,200 2010

Los Angeles Yes Yes HIGH Yes 1,000 2013

Cape Town No (OT yes, SS no) No MEDIUM No 750 2012

Nagoya No No LOW 500 2013* This is an overall estimate of capacity. In some cases cities have a combination of ‘low’ (with only one stopping area per direction) and ‘medium’ (with two stopping areas per direction) stations. Source: data www.worldbrt.net, 8 October 2014, with Yichang added August 2015

SurveysBoarding and alighting survey on board

Boarding and alighting survey on stop

Boarding and alighting per route per direction

Boarding and alighting per route per direction

per hour

OD matrix by stops

Transfer survey Final OD Demand

Network calibrationSpeed survey

Occupancy survey

BRT simulation BRT network

Bus route definition, itineraries & stops

Time savingBRT routes definition & frequency adjustment

BRT fleet requirements

Boarding and alighting at stations

BRT station dimensioning

BRT station saturation

Modeling process Network construction

ACTUAL

FUTURE

Frequency surveyFare system

representation

Model Calibration

Data collection included:• Bus speed survey on 58 routes• Frequency/occupancy survey at 22 locations (bidirectional)• Transfer survey at 5 locations:

- Yemingzhu, Pinghu, CBD Shangwuzhongxin, Beishanpo, Yilingguangchang

The boarding/alighting survey is transformed to a stop to stop matrix, using a fratar distribution model.The stop to stop matrix is then transformed to OD matrix according to transfer survey data.The OD matrix is then adjusted on the network according to occupancy survey.

Model Calibration

New data were collected in 2014:

• Boarding/Alighting survey on 48 routes involving the corridor (on a total of 72 routes)

• Bus speed survey on 58 routes in Jan 2014.

• Frequency/occupancy survey at 47 locations (bidirectional)

The total boards at AM in 2012 (29 routes)

The total boards at AM in 20124 (29 routes)

%

45713 54889 20% increase

Onboard Surveys

- 48 routes surveyed of 72

- Routes not surveyed don’t interact with corridor and low frequency

Boarding & Alighting at stops

- All stops along the corridor (44 bus stops)

Boarding & Alighting at stops per hour-AM peak

Boarding & Alighting at stops per hour AM peak – Central area

Frequency/Occupancy Surveys in 2014

Bus Frequency per hour (all network)

Bus Frequency per hour (central area)

Bus Speed per hour (all network)

From GPS data collected on bus

(bus company)

Bus Speed per hour (central area)

Frequency/Occupancy Surveys in 2014

Bus Frequency per hour (all network)

Transfer Surveys 换乘调查

Bus routes network

- Bus routes itineraries represented in the model

- Frequency per route/direction

- Identification of stops for each route

Bus route and stops

Total OD

Origins Destinations trips/hour percentage

O inside D inside 12409 22%

O inside D outside 9807 17%

O outside D inside 6557 12%

O outside D outside 27702 49%

56475 100%

O inside - D inside

Origins Destinations trips/hour percentage

O inside D inside 12409 22%

O inside D outside 9807 17%

O outside D inside 6557 12%

O outside D outside 27702 49%

56475 100%

O inside – D outside

O D trips/hour percentage

O inside D inside 12409 22%

O inside D outside 9807 17%

O outside D inside 6557 12%

O outside D outside 27702 49%

56475 100%

O outside – D inside

O D trips/hour percentage

O inside D inside 12409 22%

O inside D outside 9807 17%

O outside D inside 6557 12%

O outside D outside 27702 49%

56475 100%

O outside – D outside

O D trips/hour percentage

O inside D inside 12409 22%

O inside D outside 9807 17%

O outside D inside 6557 12%

O outside D outside 27702 49%

56475 100%

Fleet Calibration

Fleet calibration

1 46 41 33 23

4 31 28 20 20

6 22 20 15 17

9 44 40 35 31

16 10 9 9 6

17 11 10 11 7

20 22 20 24 17

24 9 8 8 6

34 12 11 12 22

35 12 11 7 4

36 12 11 6 4

37 13 12 13 10

38 13 12 12 8

62 8 7 9 6

63 13 12 14 8

65 5 5 6 9

66 7 6 10 12

68 26 23 29 20

100 38 34 31 32

101 35 32 33 37

102 25 23 27 16

103 18 16 19 16

21L 24 22 22 16

21S 14 13 13 8

27L 17 15 15 13

27S 8 7 5 2

Total 495 446 438 370

% 0.9 0.983 0.845

Real fleetRoute

Real

operational

Modeled

fleet

Adjusted

fleet

Results for actual scenario – Morning peak hourpassenger load and boardings/alightings

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

S

N

夷陵客运站三小平云一路体育馆平湖广场兴安城标神仙湾

长江市场三峡路三峡茶城平湖夜明珠黄河路望洲岗常刘路

葛洲坝二十二中学东湖一路绿萝路云集路火车站胜利四路北山坡

科技馆体育场路运河公园万寿桥杨岔路中南路宝塔河艾家嘴王家河

树脂厂伍家岗五一广场桔城路宜昌东站

Saturation N-S S-N

Station Substop-1 Substop_2 Substop_1 Substop_2

宜昌东站 0.20 0.14 0.20 0.14

桔城路 0.13 0.07 0.15 0.08

香山 0.23 0.12 0.29 0.14

伍家岗 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.22

树脂厂 0.13 0.07 0.14 0.07

王家河 0.13 0.06 0.11 0.06

艾家嘴 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.16

宝塔河 0.15 0.08 0.13 0.06

中南路 0.13 0.06 0.12 0.06

杨岔路 0.14 0.07 0.16 0.08

万寿桥 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15

工程局 0.15 0.08 0.11 0.05

金桥市场 0.13 0.11 0.18 0.15

长航医院 0.24 0.28 0.23 0.27

北山坡 0.26 0.22 0.32 0.27

胜利四路 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.07

火车站 0.26 0.38 0.16 0.24

国贸 0.21 0.11 0.20 0.11

正骨医院 0.12 0.09 0.20 0.15

长江医院 0.31 0.12 0.34 0.13

二十二中学 0.26 0.09 0.28 0.10

葛洲坝 0.33 0.12 0.31 0.11

青少年宫 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.11

望洲岗 0.19 0.17 0.20 0.18

小峡 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.19

夜明珠 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12

平湖 0.23 0.00 0.34 0.00

三峡茶城 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00

三峡路 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.00

神仙湾 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.00

神仙 0.34 0.00 0.25 0.00

锦绣星城 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00

万富 0.26 0.00 0.25 0.00

区政府 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.00

体育馆 0.21 0.00 0.23 0.00

小溪塔 0.18 0.00 0.23 0.00

自来水公司 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.00

夷陵客运站 0.16 0.00 0.15 0.00

Model Results: Load, boarding and alighting by station

Max load AM peak: 5000 passenger/hour/direction on BRT corridor

Zoom AM peak North area

Max load AM peak: 2800 passenger/hour/direction on BRT corridor

Zoom AM peak Central area

Max Load

Zoom AM peak South area

Max

Load

4800

Results for the whole corridor: BRT Routes (2 side doors)

Total fleet needed for BRT buses (2 side doors) : 187 buses without reserve

DATA MODEL MODEL RESULTS

xianlu fachejiangecheliangrongliang quanbu nenglipinlu cheliangshuxianlu changduxingcheshijianshangche chengke gongli shuchengke xiaoshi shuzuida duanmian liuliangzuida manzai lvpinlv fache jiangecheliangshu

veic. hdwy capac capac length line time pax pax max max max vol hdwy

line type (min) bus tot frec fleet (km) (min) boarding km hours volume load 2 dir frec (min) fleet

1 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 12.8 32.6 1 738 9 126 385 901 0.94 1 079 11.3 4.4 9

1r 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 12.5 32.2 1 562 8 272 351 1 079 1.12 13.5 4.4 9

4 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 12.9 34.3 1 286 7 646 334 888 0.93 888 11.1 5.4 8

4r 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 13.0 35.4 890 4 898 232 561 0.58 7.0 5.4 8

9 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 14.5 36.4 1 312 6 247 260 640 0.67 889 8.0 5.4 8

9r 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 14.5 36.9 1 425 6 919 287 889 0.93 11.1 5.4 8

34 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 14.9 42.3 1 760 9 814 440 1 180 1.23 1 180 14.8 4.1 12

34r 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 14.8 42.0 853 4 047 185 456 0.48 5.7 4.1 12

38 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 15.7 42.8 387 1 635 76 178 0.19 257 2.2 15.0 4

38r 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 15.7 43.3 481 2 008 94 257 0.27 3.2 15.0 4

62 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 10.4 29.1 448 1 334 62 232 0.24 511 2.9 9.4 4

62r 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 10.5 28.2 777 2 405 108 511 0.53 6.4 9.4 4

63 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 9.5 25.9 728 2 390 107 403 0.42 518 5.0 9.3 4

63r 10 5 80 960 12.0 6 9.5 24.7 882 2 845 123 518 0.54 6.5 9.3 4

100 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 14.1 40.4 2 028 13 717 596 1 243 1.29 1 243 15.5 3.9 12

100r 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 12.8 32.8 1 324 7 062 299 706 0.74 8.8 3.9 10

101 10 5 80 960 12.0 14 23.8 60.9 2 245 11 713 495 695 0.72 797 8.7 6.0 11

101r 10 5 80 960 12.0 14 23.9 60.3 2 074 10 418 436 797 0.83 10.0 6.0 11

102 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 15.5 39.8 1 152 4 935 209 529 0.55 720 6.6 6.7 7

102r 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 15.7 40.3 1 187 5 519 234 720 0.75 9.0 6.7 7

103 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 12.9 33.5 923 4 066 175 525 0.55 593 6.6 8.1 5

103r 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 13.3 35.0 887 3 785 160 593 0.62 7.4 8.1 5

21L 10 5 80 960 12.0 12 18.0 52.9 1 137 4 531 223 429 0.45 429 5.4 11.2 6

21Lr 10 5 80 960 12.0 12 18.2 51.2 1 090 4 629 225 391 0.41 4.9 11.2 6

21S 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 14.3 41.4 832 3 356 162 318 0.33 414 4.0 11.6 5

21Sr 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 14.2 40.3 867 3 979 192 414 0.43 5.2 11.6 4

TOTAL 312 243 378 1015 30 275 147 293 6 449 187

Regular BRT Routes (right-side only doors)

Total fleet for complementary BRT routes (right side doors) : 142 buses without reserveTotal of buses for BRT: 187 + 142 = 329Total actual fleet for the network: 741 buses, reduce to 614 with frequency adjustments (17%), reduce to 517 with BRT (13%), total reduction 30%

DATA MODEL MODEL RESULTS

xianlu fachejiangecheliangrongliang quanbu nenglipinlu cheliangshuxianlu changduxingcheshijianshangche chengke gongli shuchengke xiaoshi shuzuida duanmian liuliangzuida manzai lvpinlv fache jiangecheliangshu

veic. hdwy capac capac length line time pax pax max max max vol hdwy

line type (min) bus tot frec fleet (km) (min) boarding km hours volume load 2 dir frec (min) fleet

5 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 6.2 19.2 165 244 11 136 0.14 136 1.7 15.0 2

5r 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 8.9 27.2 55 144 7 34 0.04 0.4 15.0 3

6 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 11.8 37.3 1 574 5 741 299 853 0.89 853 10.7 5.6 8

6r 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 10.4 32.1 1 382 4 033 213 773 0.81 9.7 5.6 7

11 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 8.3 28.6 781 1 412 84 467 0.49 745 5.8 6.4 6

11r 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 8.6 27.2 1 180 2 877 156 745 0.78 9.3 6.4 5

16 10 5 80 960 12.0 7 8.7 26.2 732 2 128 108 394 0.41 394 4.9 12.2 3

16r 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 6.0 19.8 498 1 195 59 274 0.29 3.4 12.2 3

20 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 10.8 35.2 930 2 150 114 442 0.46 655 5.5 7.3 6

20r 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 11.2 37.3 1 320 2 965 168 655 0.68 8.2 7.3 6

35 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 5.3 15.4 255 542 26 186 0.19 186 2.3 15.0 2

35r 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 5.2 18.2 276 456 26 150 0.16 1.9 15.0 2

36 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 6.0 18.0 288 837 40 215 0.22 215 2.7 15.0 2

36r 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 6.0 18.0 221 556 29 138 0.14 1.7 15.0 2

37 10 5 80 960 12.0 11 22.2 49.9 487 3 087 114 213 0.22 213 2.7 15.0 4

37r 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 21.5 43.9 392 2 532 88 165 0.17 2.1 15.0 4

105 10 5 80 960 12.0 12 17.5 54.2 198 534 26 151 0.16 151 1.9 15.0 4

105r 10 5 80 960 12.0 11 15.4 48.5 171 1 265 68 125 0.13 1.6 15.0 4

107 10 5 80 960 12.0 26 38.7 121.3 1 469 7 842 390 556 0.58 556 7.0 8.6 15

107r 10 5 80 960 12.0 26 39.2 121.7 1 187 8 517 427 499 0.52 6.2 8.6 15

101B 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 17.0 37.3 454 3 901 144 340 0.35 340 4.3 14.1 3

101Br 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 17.0 36.4 456 3 959 141 314 0.33 3.9 14.1 3

102B 10 5 80 960 12.0 11 21.4 49.4 400 3 024 113 298 0.31 298 3.7 15.0 4

102Br 10 5 80 960 12.0 10 19.7 43.5 51 358 13 28 0.03 0.4 15.0 4

103B 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 17.1 36.8 371 2 542 94 258 0.27 258 3.2 15.0 3

103Br 10 5 80 960 12.0 9 17.5 36.4 333 2 844 99 225 0.23 2.8 15.0 3

27L 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 16.0 32.3 965 5 087 172 523 0.54 523 6.5 9.2 5

27Lr 10 5 80 960 12.0 8 15.2 30.3 620 3 070 99 311 0.32 3.9 9.2 4

27S 10 5 80 960 12.0 5 9.5 19.9 244 749 26 109 0.11 390 1.4 12.3 3

27Sr 10 5 80 960 12.0 6 10.3 21.2 542 1 800 65 390 0.41 4.9 12.3 3

z17 10 5 80 960 12.0 11 14.1 46.1 670 2 104 113 244 0.25 244 3.1 15.0 4

TOTAL 372 284 443 1189 18 667 78 495 3 531 142

Zoom AM peak South area

There are 13 routes using both sides door and 10 routes using right side

door.

BRT (right sides door)

Demand using BRT: 33623, 47% of total demand (71548)

Transfers: 13%

The design did not generates too much transfers, and can be adjusted after

implementation based on real data.

4 BRT route pass on this

link and no BRT routes

connect downtown area

and the south part (south of

Wuyi Guangchang).

6 BRT route pass on this link

and 2 BRT routes go to

downtown area which means

passengers who are from south

part (south of Wuyi Guangchang)

and want to go downtown,

transfer near this link.

ITDP proposed to design 1

express line to connect the

south parts to the city down,

which can reduce 1200 trips

transfer per hour (peak hour).

伍家岗

五一广场

桔香花园

宜棉小区

共勤村

批发市场

金东山

艾家嘴

万寿桥

科技馆

北山坡

火车站

夷陵广场

峡州宾馆

CBD商务中心

香格里拉花园

电脑城

小新星英语学校

火车站

Sizhong BRT station in Lanzhou, featuring a ‘directional’ station design

‘Directional’ vs 2-substop offset station

6km Yiling District section (26m)

Construction – 12 September 2015

Construction – 12 September 2015

BRT station access –predominantly at-grade

Yichang BRT corridor under construction in May 2015. The system was planned by ITDP and is funded by an ADB loan.

Yichang BRT Station Architecture Design

And Review

1. Modern, elegant and stylish station architecture

complimenting the high standards and quality

of urban design in the City of Yichang

2. Protection, comfort and convenience for transit

customers

3. Open and transparent station environments

4. Assured visibility of arriving and departing

vehicles for passengers catching frequent

transit services

5. Achieving worlds best practice in Bus Rapid

Transit station planning, design, construction

and operations

Project values

22 Zhongxue

Gezhouba

Shanzhuang Lu

Wuyi Guangchang

Yichang BRT implementation organization

• Yichang set up the BRT project leadership office in early 2014.

• General secretary of Yichang is the head of BRT project leadership office.

• Every week will have a project meeting.

• Vice Mayor of Yichang will lead meetings of special issues.

• More than 20 full time staff from related government departments join this BRT leadership office.

• Related government departments: Yichang City Government, Yichang Investment Company, Yichang Bus Company, Yichang Traffic Police, Yichang Finance Bureau, YichangConstruction Commission, underground utilities company, resettlement office, Yichangcity government Publicity office, Xiling district, Wujiagang district and Yiling district.

BRT Project Leadership Office

BRT 项目建设指挥部

Project management

division

工程管理

Traffic organization

交通组织

Operational management

运营管理

Project Comprehensive

coordination

综合协调

Capital management

资金管理

Administration office

综合办公室

Yichang BRT financing

Item Billion RMB % Note (billion RMB)

Total budget (no resettlement cost)

1.03

ADB loan 0.64 62%

City funds(by Yichang Urban

Investment Company)

0.3938%

Capital: 0.078

Loan from local bank: 0.312 (ICBC: 0.2044,

Hankou Bank: 0.1076)

8 Principles

Increase mobility by regulating parking and road use.

TOD Standard

8 Principles

(21 Metrics)

Maximum

Points

Weighting of

Principles

WALK 15 15%

CYCLE 5 5%

CONNECT 15 15%

TRANSIT 5 REQUIRED

MIX 15 15%

DENSIFY 15 15%

COMPACT 15 15%

SHIFT 20 20%

100

BRT TOD strategies

B11. 万寿桥站 改善BRT车站与周边小区的连接Wanshouqiao increase the connectivity to nearby communities

万寿桥站以东，铁路的东侧有一大型生活

区，包括大型现代化居住区， 学校以及布

局密集的城中村。但因为极大的地形高差

以及铁路的影响，该居住区的居民到达车

站需要行走五倍于直线距离的路程 建议

增加带顶棚的坡道及人行路径。

万寿桥以西现状有大片的工业及仓库用地，

但由于西侧多个出入口常年处于关闭状态，

导致夷陵大道西侧的居住区居民到达车站

需要绕行至少2.5倍于直线距离的路程。建

议在通勤时间段（如7:00-19:00）对关闭

闸门进行限时段开放。

碧翠苑小区

廊桥水岸

丰源小区

292m

331m

408m

832m绕行指数：2.0

455m绕行指数：1.6

845m绕行指数：2.6

EXISTING ACCESS

现有通道

Existing Access 现有通道

站点示例

B11. 万寿桥站 东面：与碧翠苑小区的新增连接路径Wanshouqiao East: Add new path to Bicuiyuan xiaoqu

碧翠苑小区

站点示例

在碧翠苑西南侧新建出入口和通往BRT车站的人行步道 Add new path and entrance at the south of the community.

新建跨越铁路的人行天桥Add new pedestrian bridge across the rail.

项目 长(m) 宽(m) 面积(m2) 单价（元/m2) 总价（万元）

新铺设步行道 72 3 216 200 4.32

新建跨铁路人行桥 25 3 75 15000 112.50

新建下坡步道 31 3 93 200 1.86

新增行人路灯 5.00

新增行人指引系统 1.25

总计 124.93

Current

Proposed

Current Proposed

Zhuoyue Plaza public space conceptual design

现状

建议

Pingyun Yilu BRT station area development

现状

改善后

Yichang reforms on-street parking along BRT corridor.

500 setback parking spaces eliminated as part of corridor improvement plan

Yichang has in recent months implemented a major on-street parking

reform program focused along the BRT corridor in Dongshan Avenue.

Roughly half of the 1,000 off-street parking spaces along the BRT corridor

have been removed (see photos below), and the remaining setback parking

is now better managed to eliminate or minimize encroachment on pedestrian and bicycle facilities. (Setback parking defined as parking in the

area between the edge of the walkway and the building frontage. It does

not include parking on the walkway, which is illegal.)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

8:3

0:0

0…

8:5

5:0

0…

9:2

0:0

0…

9:4

5:0

0…

10

:10

:00

…

10

:35

:00

…

11

:00

:00

…

11

:25

:00

…

11

:50

:00

…

12

:15

:00

…

12

:40

:00

…

1:0

5:0

0…

1:3

0:0

0…

1:5

5:0

0…

2:2

0:0

0…

2:4

5:0

0…

3:1

0:0

0…

3:3

5:0

0…

4:0

0:0

0…

4:2

5:0

0…

4:5

0:0

0…

5:1

5:0

0…

5:4

0:0

0…

6:0

5:0

0…

6:3

0:0

0…

6:5

5:0

0…

7:2

0:0

0…

7:4

5:0

0…

8:1

0:0

0…

8:3

5:0

0…

9:0

0:0

0…

9:2

5:0

0…

9:5

0:0

0…

国贸大酒店 Guomao Hotel

国贸商场 Guomao Mall

国贸立体停车 Guomao Mechanical Parking

宜昌商场 Yichang Mall

均瑶国际大酒店 Junyao Hotel

均瑶周边后退区和人行道 Setback and Sidewalk

around Junyao

清江大厦和万佳幸福家园 Qingjiang & Wanjia

卓悦广场 Joyful Plaza

停车总数（不含国贸商场、宜昌商场和均瑶周边

后退区和人行道） Total Occupancy (exclude. setback around Guomao Mall, Yichang Mall and

Junyao)停车位总数（不含所有调查点的后退区） Total

Capacity (exclude. setback around all survey points)

Yunjilu BRT station area parking occupancy survey

闲置车位

车位供给总数（不含后退区）

停车需求总数（不含国贸、宜昌商场和均瑶的后退区停车）

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

8:30

:00

AM

9:00

:00

AM

9:30

:00

AM

10:0

0:00

AM

10:3

0:00

AM

11:0

0:00

AM

11:3

0:00

AM

12:0

0:00

PM

12:3

0:00

PM

1:00

:00

PM

1:30

:00

PM

2:00

:00

PM

2:30

:00

PM

3:00

:00

PM

3:30

:00

PM

4:00

:00

PM

4:30

:00

PM

5:00

:00

PM

5:30

:00

PM

6:00

:00

PM

6:30

:00

PM

7:00

:00

PM

7:30

:00

PM

8:00

:00

PM

8:30

:00

PM

9:00

:00

PM

9:30

:00

PM

10:0

0:00

PM

后退区停车总数（国贸商场、宜昌商场和均瑶周边后退区和人行道） Setback

Occupancy (setback around Guomao Mall, Yichang Mall and Junyao)

闲置车位总数（不含国贸商场、宜昌商场和均瑶周边后退区和人行道停车需求）

Total vacancy (exclude. setback around Guomao Mall, Yichang Mall and Junyao parking demand)

Summary

右图红色区域的闲置车位

右图黄色区域的停车需求 ：为后退区停车

即使不占用后退区和人行道，现有的车位仍然可以满足区域的停车需求。

过量供给

Ongoing NMT improvements

Yichang has commenced implementation of BRT station area improvements in 12 locations along the BRT corridor, with landscaping, covered walkways and public space and further BRT station access improvements to be implemented in 2015. City centre covered walkway structures are under construction. Yichang has improved conditions for bicycles and pedestrians, with 30km of bike lanes (part of a planned 220km network), and 700 trees planted along with 29 new safe pedestrian crossings and 400 bollards installed along the BRT corridor. A bike sharing system has been approved and will be implemented in December 2015.

Car Free Day in Yichang, 22 September 2015

Yichang bike sharing system

• First phase: 27 stations with 645 bikes in the downtown area. This bike sharing system was approved by the municipal government and the bidding procedures are ongoing.

• First coverage area in the downtown will open in December 2015

• The municipal bus company, which is also the BRT system operator, will manage and operate the system

Proposed bike sharing (2012)

Coverage of the first phase Yichang bike sharing system opening in December 2015

Thank you

• www.itdp-china.org

• www.worldbrt.net

• www.transportphoto.net

• www.sitevisits.net