of 44
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
1/44
History of EnglishFIL ANG 524
2013/2014
Week 2
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
2/44
Proto-Indo-European
Spoken perhaps 5000 to 6000 years ago the Indo-European homeland problem
the two homeland hypotheses: Gimbutas & Renfrew
Trask (1994:357)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
3/44
Maria Gimbutas and the Kurgan culture
5th and early 4th millennia BC, the region of the Volga River,north of the Caspian Sea
They buried their important dead in tombs which were often
covered by an artificial mound called in Russian a kurgan.
Apparently they were warlike pastoralists who rode horses and
used wheeled vehicles; they had a cult of sky gods and sun
worship, a strongly patriarchal organisation, and a great love forhorses and weapons.
There is evidence that the Kurgan people, some time after 4000
BC, spread out eastwards into central Asia, Persia, and India,westwards into central Europe and the Balkans, and southwards
across the Caucasus into Anatolia.
Trask (1996: 358-9)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
4/44
Colin Renfrew argues that, at a time when states and even cities didnot yet exist, no group of people could have possessed the economicand technological resources necessary to launch large-scale invasionsand to overrun already populated lands.
He advanced a very different scenario: IE speech must have defused
slowly and peacefully across Eurasia in conjunction with someeconomic or technological advance.
He can find only one such advance which is sufficiently widespreadand important to be the vehicle of such linguistics spread: the
development and spread of agriculture. Agriculture did spread out slowly across much of Europe and Asia
from a very few small sites principally in the Middle East, but thatspread of agriculture began not 6 000 years ago but over 10 000 years
ago, in the Neolithic, or the Late Stone Age. This date is quite unacceptable to most linguists: such an early date
would require IE speech to have diffused over a vast area during thethousands of years while hardly changing at all, something whichhistorical linguists consider impossible. Trask (1996: 360-1)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
5/44
A recent contribution to the debate: Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P.,Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray,R. D., Suchard, M. A., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012). Mapping the originsand expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science, 337:957960.
In this paper we identify the homeland of the Indo-European
language family by adapting phylogeographic methods initiallydeveloped by epidemiologists to trace the origins of virusoutbreaks. Instead of comparing viruses, we compare languagesand instead of DNA, we look for shared cognates words that have
a common origin, such as mother, mutter and madre acrossvarious Indo-European languages. We use the cognates to infer afamily tree of the languages and, together with information aboutthe location of each language, we trace back through time to infer
the location at the root of the tree the origin of Indo-European.
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
6/44
The analysis finds that an Anatolian origin is more
likely than a Steppe origin.
http://language.cs.auckland.ac.nz/
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
7/44
Language Log
Andrew Byrd reading Schleicher's Fablehttp://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=7179
ARCHEOLOGY
Telling Tales in Proto-Indo-European
http://archaeology.org/exclusives/articles/1302-proto-indo-
european-schleichers-fable
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
8/44
The pre-history of Proto-Into-European?
Some proposals:
Nostratic
The Nostraticists propose that Nostratic existed about15,00012,000 BC, among hunter-gatherers, generally
somewhere in South-West Asia. They have opponents in
abundance who challenge the entire concept of Nostratic, andmost certainly ones ability to reconstruct proto-languages at
such a time depth
Mallory and Adams (2006:84)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
9/44
Mallory and Adams (2006:84)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
10/44
The tree of originof humanlanguages, drawn
by Merritt Ruhlenin 1994, based ongenetic knowledge,with the likely
range of initialdivergence dates(Kya= 1,000 yearsago)
From
Cavalli-Sforza(2000:169)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
11/44
From Cavalli-Sforza (2000:94)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
12/44
Two models of linguistic change andtwo ways of representing the internal structure of a
language family
Tree model Stammbaumtheorie,
August Schleicher (182168)
Wave model Wellentheorie,
Johannes Schmidt (18431901)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
13/44
Tree model
Within a language family:
some languages are more closely related and formsubgroups
they are identified as such through
shared innovations changes which have appeared insome members of the family but not in others
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
14/44
Trask (1994)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
15/44
The Indo-European family of languages
(a simplified representation)
Proto-Indo-European
Slavic
Germanic
Celtic
Italic
Albanian
Hellenic
Armenian
Baltic Indo-Iranian
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
16/44
Mallory and Adams (2006)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
17/44
A modern tree diagram
of the Indo-European
languages suggested byEric Hamp (1990)
From Mallory and Adams
(2008:74)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
18/44
Wave model
a wave model diagram is similar to a dialect map
a language change spreads like a wave
an innovation spreads from its point of origin to some
but not all speakers (dialects, languages)
it shows graphically the continuing contact between
dialects and languages (branching in the tree model
suggests series of clean brakes with no connection
between branches after they have split)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
19/44
Mallory and Adams (2006:73)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
20/44
Wave model
Trask (1994)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
21/44
Today
http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/family.maps
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
22/44
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
23/44
The Uralic
languages
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
24/44
Today
http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/family.maps
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
25/44
The Germanic family of languages
Most specialists believe Proto-Germanic was spoken
in southern Scandinavia perhaps around 500 B.C.
Germanic languages are believed to have strated outmore than 2000 years ago as regional dialects of
Proto-Germanic
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
26/44
Mallory and Adams (2006:21)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
27/44
Germanic
languages
today
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
28/44
The Germanic family of languages
(a simplified tree)
Proto-GermanicProto-Germanic
West GermanicWest Germanic North GermanicNorth Germanic East GermanicEast Germanic
English
German
Dutch
Flemish
Frisian
Yiddish
English
German
Dutch
Flemish
Frisian
Yiddish
Swedish
Danish
Norwegian
Faroese
Icelandic
Swedish
Danish
NorwegianFaroese
Icelandic
(Gothic)(Gothic)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
29/44
The Germanic runic alphabet futhark
(Page 1987:8)
angular letters of uncertain origin, cut in hard material (stone, bone,
wood)
in some inscriptions runes are arranged in a fixed order
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
30/44
Examples of runic inscriptions:
Page (1987:2, 31)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
31/44
Page (1987:29, 40)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
32/44
Page (1987:7)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
33/44
View of end View of end
Front Back
http://www.britishmuseum.org/
The Franks Casket
(named after theman through whomit came to the
British Museum)
Length: 22.9 cm
Width: 19.0 cmHeight: 10.9 cm
A whale bone box
The inscriptionsattest a dialect fromnorthern or northMidland England
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
34/44
The early runic inscriptions (Page 1987:24)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
35/44
Brezafuthark tentatively attributed to the 6th c.
inscribed on a semi-circular half-column (56 cm high, 30 cm wide)
the building itself may have been an early Christian church the inscription is not complete: the last three letters are broken
away, and the carver missed out b
the runes are between 0.5 and 2.6 cms high.
http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/idg/germ/runentab.htm
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
36/44
The National Museum of
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
37/44
The Anglo-Saxonfuthork
introduction of Christianity the Latin script introducedinstead of the runic scriptfuthork
Page (1987:19)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
38/44
f u o r c
feoh ur orn os rad cenwealth wild ox thorn god ride torch
cattle mouth journey
each rune represented a sound and it also represented
a word beginning with that sound
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
39/44
lnglanglong
ungjungyoung
konung, kungKnigkingmanMannman
hemHeimhome
sverdSchwertswordfiskFischfish
hundHundhound
stjrnaSternstar
huvudHaupthead < OE heafod
SwedishGermanEnglish
Some cognate words from the shared vocabulary
of the Germanic language family:
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
40/44
Cognate words of Latin origin from the shared vocabulary:
(the early contact between the Romans and the Germanic tribes
on the continent)
pepparPfefferpepper
vinWeinwine
kokakochencook
kpakaufencheap
tegelZiegeltilepundPfundpound
milMeilemile
SwedishGermanEnglish
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
41/44
Names of the days of the week
Tuesday < Tiwes-dg the day of the god Tiw, an old god of war Latdies Martis (the day of Mars)
Wednesday < Wodens-dg the day of the god Woden (Odin), the chief god of war, Runes,
poetry and witchcraft LatMercurii dies (the day of Mercury)
Thursday < Thunres-dg the day of the god Thunor, the god of thunder
Latdies Jovis (the day of Jupiter)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
42/44
Friday < Frige-dg the day of the fertility goddess Frig, Woden's wife. Latdies Veneris (the day of Venus)
Also:Saturday < Stern(es)-dg
LatSaturni dies (the day of Saturn)
Sunday < sunnan-dg Latdies solis (the day of the sun)
Monday < monan-dg Latlunae dies (the day of the moon)
S h t i ti f
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
43/44
Some common characteristics ofthe Germanic languages:
Verb system:
two tense verb system: present & preterite
strong verbs: vowel change (vowel gradation) in the
stem to mark past tense
weak verbs: a dental suffix (-de, -te) to mark the past tense
Fixed (dynamic) stress on the root syllable (usually the first
syllable)
Dual adjectival declension (strong and weak)
The First Germanic Consonant Shiftalso called
Grimms Law Jacob Grimm (1785-1863)
7/24/2019 Week 2 1314
44/44
Grimms Law Jacob Grimm (1785-1863)