+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Week 2 1314

Week 2 1314

Date post: 23-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: emina0104
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 44

Transcript
  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    1/44

    History of EnglishFIL ANG 524

    2013/2014

    Week 2

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    2/44

    Proto-Indo-European

    Spoken perhaps 5000 to 6000 years ago the Indo-European homeland problem

    the two homeland hypotheses: Gimbutas & Renfrew

    Trask (1994:357)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    3/44

    Maria Gimbutas and the Kurgan culture

    5th and early 4th millennia BC, the region of the Volga River,north of the Caspian Sea

    They buried their important dead in tombs which were often

    covered by an artificial mound called in Russian a kurgan.

    Apparently they were warlike pastoralists who rode horses and

    used wheeled vehicles; they had a cult of sky gods and sun

    worship, a strongly patriarchal organisation, and a great love forhorses and weapons.

    There is evidence that the Kurgan people, some time after 4000

    BC, spread out eastwards into central Asia, Persia, and India,westwards into central Europe and the Balkans, and southwards

    across the Caucasus into Anatolia.

    Trask (1996: 358-9)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    4/44

    Colin Renfrew argues that, at a time when states and even cities didnot yet exist, no group of people could have possessed the economicand technological resources necessary to launch large-scale invasionsand to overrun already populated lands.

    He advanced a very different scenario: IE speech must have defused

    slowly and peacefully across Eurasia in conjunction with someeconomic or technological advance.

    He can find only one such advance which is sufficiently widespreadand important to be the vehicle of such linguistics spread: the

    development and spread of agriculture. Agriculture did spread out slowly across much of Europe and Asia

    from a very few small sites principally in the Middle East, but thatspread of agriculture began not 6 000 years ago but over 10 000 years

    ago, in the Neolithic, or the Late Stone Age. This date is quite unacceptable to most linguists: such an early date

    would require IE speech to have diffused over a vast area during thethousands of years while hardly changing at all, something whichhistorical linguists consider impossible. Trask (1996: 360-1)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    5/44

    A recent contribution to the debate: Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P.,Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray,R. D., Suchard, M. A., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012). Mapping the originsand expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science, 337:957960.

    In this paper we identify the homeland of the Indo-European

    language family by adapting phylogeographic methods initiallydeveloped by epidemiologists to trace the origins of virusoutbreaks. Instead of comparing viruses, we compare languagesand instead of DNA, we look for shared cognates words that have

    a common origin, such as mother, mutter and madre acrossvarious Indo-European languages. We use the cognates to infer afamily tree of the languages and, together with information aboutthe location of each language, we trace back through time to infer

    the location at the root of the tree the origin of Indo-European.

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    6/44

    The analysis finds that an Anatolian origin is more

    likely than a Steppe origin.

    http://language.cs.auckland.ac.nz/

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    7/44

    Language Log

    Andrew Byrd reading Schleicher's Fablehttp://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=7179

    ARCHEOLOGY

    Telling Tales in Proto-Indo-European

    http://archaeology.org/exclusives/articles/1302-proto-indo-

    european-schleichers-fable

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    8/44

    The pre-history of Proto-Into-European?

    Some proposals:

    Nostratic

    The Nostraticists propose that Nostratic existed about15,00012,000 BC, among hunter-gatherers, generally

    somewhere in South-West Asia. They have opponents in

    abundance who challenge the entire concept of Nostratic, andmost certainly ones ability to reconstruct proto-languages at

    such a time depth

    Mallory and Adams (2006:84)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    9/44

    Mallory and Adams (2006:84)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    10/44

    The tree of originof humanlanguages, drawn

    by Merritt Ruhlenin 1994, based ongenetic knowledge,with the likely

    range of initialdivergence dates(Kya= 1,000 yearsago)

    From

    Cavalli-Sforza(2000:169)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    11/44

    From Cavalli-Sforza (2000:94)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    12/44

    Two models of linguistic change andtwo ways of representing the internal structure of a

    language family

    Tree model Stammbaumtheorie,

    August Schleicher (182168)

    Wave model Wellentheorie,

    Johannes Schmidt (18431901)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    13/44

    Tree model

    Within a language family:

    some languages are more closely related and formsubgroups

    they are identified as such through

    shared innovations changes which have appeared insome members of the family but not in others

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    14/44

    Trask (1994)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    15/44

    The Indo-European family of languages

    (a simplified representation)

    Proto-Indo-European

    Slavic

    Germanic

    Celtic

    Italic

    Albanian

    Hellenic

    Armenian

    Baltic Indo-Iranian

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    16/44

    Mallory and Adams (2006)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    17/44

    A modern tree diagram

    of the Indo-European

    languages suggested byEric Hamp (1990)

    From Mallory and Adams

    (2008:74)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    18/44

    Wave model

    a wave model diagram is similar to a dialect map

    a language change spreads like a wave

    an innovation spreads from its point of origin to some

    but not all speakers (dialects, languages)

    it shows graphically the continuing contact between

    dialects and languages (branching in the tree model

    suggests series of clean brakes with no connection

    between branches after they have split)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    19/44

    Mallory and Adams (2006:73)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    20/44

    Wave model

    Trask (1994)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    21/44

    Today

    http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/family.maps

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    22/44

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    23/44

    The Uralic

    languages

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    24/44

    Today

    http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/family.maps

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    25/44

    The Germanic family of languages

    Most specialists believe Proto-Germanic was spoken

    in southern Scandinavia perhaps around 500 B.C.

    Germanic languages are believed to have strated outmore than 2000 years ago as regional dialects of

    Proto-Germanic

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    26/44

    Mallory and Adams (2006:21)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    27/44

    Germanic

    languages

    today

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    28/44

    The Germanic family of languages

    (a simplified tree)

    Proto-GermanicProto-Germanic

    West GermanicWest Germanic North GermanicNorth Germanic East GermanicEast Germanic

    English

    German

    Dutch

    Flemish

    Frisian

    Yiddish

    English

    German

    Dutch

    Flemish

    Frisian

    Yiddish

    Swedish

    Danish

    Norwegian

    Faroese

    Icelandic

    Swedish

    Danish

    NorwegianFaroese

    Icelandic

    (Gothic)(Gothic)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    29/44

    The Germanic runic alphabet futhark

    (Page 1987:8)

    angular letters of uncertain origin, cut in hard material (stone, bone,

    wood)

    in some inscriptions runes are arranged in a fixed order

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    30/44

    Examples of runic inscriptions:

    Page (1987:2, 31)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    31/44

    Page (1987:29, 40)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    32/44

    Page (1987:7)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    33/44

    View of end View of end

    Front Back

    http://www.britishmuseum.org/

    The Franks Casket

    (named after theman through whomit came to the

    British Museum)

    Length: 22.9 cm

    Width: 19.0 cmHeight: 10.9 cm

    A whale bone box

    The inscriptionsattest a dialect fromnorthern or northMidland England

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    34/44

    The early runic inscriptions (Page 1987:24)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    35/44

    Brezafuthark tentatively attributed to the 6th c.

    inscribed on a semi-circular half-column (56 cm high, 30 cm wide)

    the building itself may have been an early Christian church the inscription is not complete: the last three letters are broken

    away, and the carver missed out b

    the runes are between 0.5 and 2.6 cms high.

    http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/didact/idg/germ/runentab.htm

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    36/44

    The National Museum of

    Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    37/44

    The Anglo-Saxonfuthork

    introduction of Christianity the Latin script introducedinstead of the runic scriptfuthork

    Page (1987:19)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    38/44

    f u o r c

    feoh ur orn os rad cenwealth wild ox thorn god ride torch

    cattle mouth journey

    each rune represented a sound and it also represented

    a word beginning with that sound

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    39/44

    lnglanglong

    ungjungyoung

    konung, kungKnigkingmanMannman

    hemHeimhome

    sverdSchwertswordfiskFischfish

    hundHundhound

    stjrnaSternstar

    huvudHaupthead < OE heafod

    SwedishGermanEnglish

    Some cognate words from the shared vocabulary

    of the Germanic language family:

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    40/44

    Cognate words of Latin origin from the shared vocabulary:

    (the early contact between the Romans and the Germanic tribes

    on the continent)

    pepparPfefferpepper

    vinWeinwine

    kokakochencook

    kpakaufencheap

    tegelZiegeltilepundPfundpound

    milMeilemile

    SwedishGermanEnglish

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    41/44

    Names of the days of the week

    Tuesday < Tiwes-dg the day of the god Tiw, an old god of war Latdies Martis (the day of Mars)

    Wednesday < Wodens-dg the day of the god Woden (Odin), the chief god of war, Runes,

    poetry and witchcraft LatMercurii dies (the day of Mercury)

    Thursday < Thunres-dg the day of the god Thunor, the god of thunder

    Latdies Jovis (the day of Jupiter)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    42/44

    Friday < Frige-dg the day of the fertility goddess Frig, Woden's wife. Latdies Veneris (the day of Venus)

    Also:Saturday < Stern(es)-dg

    LatSaturni dies (the day of Saturn)

    Sunday < sunnan-dg Latdies solis (the day of the sun)

    Monday < monan-dg Latlunae dies (the day of the moon)

    S h t i ti f

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    43/44

    Some common characteristics ofthe Germanic languages:

    Verb system:

    two tense verb system: present & preterite

    strong verbs: vowel change (vowel gradation) in the

    stem to mark past tense

    weak verbs: a dental suffix (-de, -te) to mark the past tense

    Fixed (dynamic) stress on the root syllable (usually the first

    syllable)

    Dual adjectival declension (strong and weak)

    The First Germanic Consonant Shiftalso called

    Grimms Law Jacob Grimm (1785-1863)

  • 7/24/2019 Week 2 1314

    44/44

    Grimms Law Jacob Grimm (1785-1863)


Recommended