welcome7th nEUroBlend project meeting, 11 and 12 March 2007, Lund, Sweden

Who is going to make the minutes?

Introduction

Meetings Reykjavik

Monday

May 28

Tuesday May 29

Wednesday May 30

Thursday May 31

Friday June 1

Saturday June 2

09:00 -12:30

Neuroblend Neuroblend WFNN Congress Congress Congress

13:30 -17:00

Neuroblend Neuroblend WFNN Congress Congress

18:00 –21:30

EANN Welcome reception

Pentecost

Whitsunday

FinancesTravelling & accommodation Neuroblend

• Lund meeting: – Max 2x daily rate for Sweden € 157 = € 314 – For EANN members: 1 one way ticket

max. 2 hotel nights

• Reykjavik meeting:– Max. 2x daily rate for Iceland € 183 = € 366 – For all partners 1 one way ticket

2. Where did we come from,where do we go to

WP1curriculum

development

WP5ICT support &

Production

WP4educational

design &development

WP3evaluation, surveys &monitoring

WP2conferences

& publications

Project management

Project advisory groupSilent partners

Project boardFull partners

Where do we come from, where do we go to

The project: Partners

Radcliffe infermary,

Oxford

Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis,

Roeselare-Menen

University medical center

St Radboud, Nijmegen

Univerity Hospital, Helsinki

Oulu Polytechnic,Oulu

Lund University Hospital

Landspitali University Hospital

Reykjavik

Örebro Universität, Jonkoping University

St. Luke’s hospital,

Malta

Silent Partners

(European Associations)EANN

EFN (nurses EU)FINE (nurse educators)

(National Associations)BE: BVNV/ABIN

DK: DANNUK: BANNFI: FANNSE: SANNNL: NVNVIS: IANNIT: ANIN

SW: SGNP

Mikkelli University

Hvidovre Hospital

Copenhagen

Competence based learningA competence describes behaviour needed to be successful in a professional

context.

Levels criteria, reflectionCompetence development requires the use of knowledge, skills and attitudes in an integrated way

within an authentic learning environment

Different every time

situation

Meta-action

Result/product

action

Knowledge

Skills

Attitudes

rolesAnticipate

Plan care or treatment

Reflection

Justify actions

Explain why

Criteria for action

Product criteria

standards & routines

3. Minutes 6th meeting

4. Announcements

• agreement with Malta about conditions for withdrawal

5. Interim report

• Interim report & amendment sent in at the same time (November 30).

• Colour green!

• Means LdV has confidence in the project

• We can go on & payments are ok

• Changes are explained very well

• Good website, Neuroblend scores on Google

• -- Delay!!, no products yet!

Results WP 1 NL BE FI-H FI

O-M

IS MT

DE

SE-L SE-

O-J

UK

ECP(January 07)

L

ELP(March 07)

A/ L

MD module description(March 07)

FLP Flexible learning Paths(March 07)

EO Organisation of education(March 07)

A/ L

PPT Plan for increasing professionalisation of teachers (March 07)

A /L

IMP implementation plan(March 07)

QAC Quality assurance accreditation & certification (March 07)

BLP Blended Learning Plan(March 07)

A/ L

Fine tuned and piloted curriculum(July 07)

A

A = ADVICE L = LITERATURE

WP 1

• Fine tuned and pilotted curriculum

Results WP 2 NL BE FI-H FI

O-M

IS MT

DE

SE-L SE

O-J

UK

Board meetings and curriculum conferenced1 Helsinki (November 05)

2 Helsinki(December 05)

3 Helsinki(March 06)

4 Helsinki(June 06)

5 Helsinki(September 06)

6 Helsinki(December 06)

7 Lund(March 07)

8 Reykjavik(Reykjavik 07)

9 Helsinki(September 07 )

Reykjavik congress, presentations & posters(May/June 07)

Valorisation, presentations, posters, articles, websites, other valorisation (depending)

Newsletter(Monthly in 2007)

Organisation board meetings

WP 2

• Book

• Website, filling up of vectors

Results WP 3 NL BE FI-H FI

O-M

IS MT

DE

SE-L SE

O-J

UK

Survey starting situation + report(february 07)

A

Survey curriculum conferences + report(March 07)

A

Survey monitoring pilot projects and learning objects + report (April 07)

A

Survey ending situation + report(August 07)

A

Surveys, project evaluation + report(August 07)

A

Survey respondent support(see above)

Survey new EU member countries preparation (February 07)

Survey new EU member countries analysis and reports (May 07)

Peer reviews of learning objects(during project period)

List of decisions board meetings and CC(after project board meetings)

Info Interim report & amendment to NL(October 06)

Information final reports to NL(August 07)

Project monitoring log & (November 06)

Interim and final reports to LdV (30 November 07)

Lessons learned report(September 07)

A = ADVICE L = LITERATURe

WP 3

• Letter update & contacting to 1st and 2nd circle

• ECP survey (2)

• New member states survey (3)

• Peer review form

• Subjects next surveys– Survey (4): ELP, BLP – Survey (5): MD+ FLP & EO + IMP– Survey (6): QAC, PPT

WP 3 surveys and monitoring

Procedure all surveys• Salla & Carol make questions and send them to

Paul• Paul makes a setup and send it to Salla, Carol

& Gerd for final approval & English language check

• operator survey module in Moodle: Paul• Ann Cathrin: supporting silent partners. • Paul send results to Carol for report• Carol send draft report to Salla, Gerd & Paul• Presentation report next meeting

Results WP 4Content oriented

NL BE FI-H FI

O-M

IS MT

DE

SE-L SE

O-J

UK

Classification and metadata specification learning tools (December 05)

Design, development and pilot digital repository of learning objects (December 05)

Educational design, development and pilot didactical templates (May 07)

Production patient & ward cases in learning object template (video & text) (Jan-Sep 07)

Linking materials from 11 area’s to cases (until August 07)

Operational VLE with ready to use example courses (June 07)

Operational repository with learning objects, informed consent statements, templatres & peer reviews (April 07)

Operational community of practise for teachers and content matter experts including wiki (April 07)

WP 4• BE: filling up repository • Patient & ward cases

– Informed consent procedure– Video & editing equipment BE?– Templates: webquest format– Registering patient videos pending– Topics & cases from all partners in 11 areas

• Repository: peer review• 11 areas: PDF, WIKI & European Identity• Copy right issues• Examples• Medical & nursing content• The shaping of the nursing component• Peer review development

Results WP 5Technical, pedagogical,

communicative

NL BE FI-H FI

O-M

IS MT SE-L SE

O-J

UK

Operational shared workspace for project participants (November 05)

Operational shared workspace for neurosciense nurse trainers including wiki’s (April 07)

Operational questionaire tool (November 05)

Operational video conferencing tools (November 05)

Operational digital repository of learning objects (December 06)

Production video patiënt cases assets

(including registration & editing) (cont.)

Book (May 07 & Oktober 07)

Operational virtual learning environment (September 06)

Content and redaction of the operational software tools (continue)

WP 5

• New modules in Moodle

7. Curriculum documents

• Writing team

• peer review procedure

8. Helicopter view over the after neuroblend landscape

focus on Europe and new project possibilities

• EANN policy development • Towards a European network as a structure for

development & implementation• New projects, new subsidies new partnerships,

new promotors? • Train the trainer• Quality assurance, certification & accreditation• Development of learning materials

9. Helicopter view over the after Neuroblend landscapefocus on 2 examples of implementation of

competence based learning in vocational training

1. The development of a competence based curriculum in cooperation between a polytechnic and a hospital.

Geert Teerling

2. The development of a Neuroblend oriented curriculum for nurses working in hospitals, nursing homes & community nursing.

Nory Burgers

10. Helicopter view over the after neuroblend landscape

focus on the situation of the partner countries

• Example scenarios• 10 minutes presentation of each country

– Level of competence based in training– Differences or special attentions and strategies when

implementing Neuroblend in» Hospitals» University hospitals» Nursing homes» Rehabilitation centres» Community nursing

• How are teachers and trainers involved?

11 Patient and ward cases• Demo/examples• Templates and structure of patiënt & ward cases

– The adapted WebQuest format in Moodle– Personal Development plan and digital portfolio– Assessment

• Who is doing what & when?• Peer review procedure (BE?)• Collecting content for the resources section (UK)• Topics for patiënt & ward cases to the 11 content

areas• Patiënt & ward cases related to levels• (cultural) translation

12. Reykjavik speakers & presentations

• All abstracts accepted

• 1 Workshop instead of 2

• Appointments

• Workshop Kate??

plenary Day 1 Opening Paul,Marianne

Basics,trends,patiënt needs,domains

Day 2 Day 3

Plenary keynote presentation Nicolai

The Neuroblend challenges

Project overview, examples, use, future

Poster vist

Ann Cathrin

CoffeeWorkshop Salla Seppänen

Workshop ‘In-depth with Neuroblend’

Starting to use the materials in different situations, teaching, implementing, Hidden: philosophy, identity, Short presentations, discussion,questions, examples,Hospital/university, Different cultures

Session presentation Carol

neuroblend project: A review of the education needs of neuroscience nurses across Europe to improve patient care.

lunchSession presentation Paul

Bridging the distance: the Neuroblend competence based learning framework

Workshop the Neuroblend crew

Workshop: Hands on experience with Neuroblend

Working with pc’s and laptops with the learning materials as a student and as a teacher, What can you do in the system

thee

Session presentation Winny &Andre

Blended learning in practice. New e-learning materials: Where do I get my information today?

13 Evaluation & appointments

Matrix MD (example)

The profession of the Neuroscience Nurse Salla Marria

Anatomy and physiology of the nervus system Winny

Neuro acute care (general) Andre

Neurorehabilitation (general) Paul

Neuro Palliative care (general) Gerd, Marria, Salla

Anatomy

Physiology(Specific)

Disease/

Medical/ patho-phys.

Acute neuro care

(Specific)

Neuro

Rehabilitation(Specific)

Neuro

Palliative care(Specific)

Stroke Marianne

Parkinson’s disease Ann-Cathrin Winny

Epilepsy Ann-Cathrin

MS Carol

Neuro oncology Ann-Cathrin

Winny

Neurotrauma Winny, Ritva

Salla:student cases translation

Total proposedbudget

P1UMCN

NL

P2HHRBE

P7Oulu

FI

P8HUH

FI

P10LUHIS

P13 St Luke

MTA. Staff costs 256063 82.824 37.141 6.375 9.025 5.855 1596

B. Operating costs*

1. Travel 61.596 16.229 7700 1600 3050 5900 25172. ICT 1.650 1.650    

3. Production 1.950 750 150 0 150 150 04. Overheads 17.000 10.000 1.000 500 1.000 500 2505. Others 14.867 2.567 350 0 9.850 350 0

Sub-total B 97.063 31,196 9.200 2.100 14.050 6.900 2767C. Sub-contracting costs* 1.Consultancy 14.500 14.500

2.translation 5.000 5.000  

3.Printing 9.500 9.500  

Sub-total C 29.000 29.000  

TOTAL 382126 143.020 46.341 8.475 23.075 12.755 4.363LdV Grant 285295 102.788 35.190 6.277 16.305 10.130 3.577

Total proposedbudget

P15LundSE

P16OrebrSE

P19Radcl

UK

P22Mikkel(new)

FI

P23 Jonko(new)

SE

P24 Hvidovre

(new) DK

A. Staff costs 256063 10.841 14.060 26.715 39.250 16.425 5956

B. Operating costs*

1. Travel 61.596 4850 2400 7750 3750 3050 28002. ICT 1.650

3. Production 1.950 150 0 150 150 150 1504. Overheads 17.000 1000 440 1000 500 560 2505. Others 14.867 350 0 350 350 350 350

Sub-total B 97.063 6.350 2.840 9250 4750 4.110 3550C. Sub-contracting costs* 1.Consultancy 14.500

2.translation 5.000

3.Printing 9.500

Sub-total C 29.000

TOTAL 382126 17.191 16.900 35.965 44.000 20535 9506LdV Grant 285295 12.911 12.860 29.015 33.219 15.770 7.253

Cases production

idea

abstract

webquest

prototype

Peer review

metadata

repository

Video

Text

Resources

Teacher

Cases peer review

content Nursing

Neuroblend

education

Rev.A

X X

Rev.B

X X

Rev.C

X

• Author

• Heal form

• The case

• Metadata

• Repository

revision

+Peer review form

Repository

Moodle

Lamscare