Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ahmad-myatt |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Welcome slide
A more risk-based approach to quality assurance in higher
education in England
June 2012 consultation events
Heather Fry Director (Education Participation and Students), HEFCE
To outline:
• Main features
• Underlying principles
• Key proposals
• Continuing emphases: e.g. the student interest and educational enhancement
Purposes
Applied to • QA system as a whole -
Review, progress monitoring, QAA Concerns scheme
• All providers with access to HEFCE funding
• All other QAA subscribers
But no risk categories
Taking a more risk-based approach
A system based on where we are now, and which:
• continues to align with and be built on institutional quality assurance
• yet is robust and rigorous, facilitating HEFCE’s statutory duty
• is universal, requiring all providers to engage with UK HE Quality Code
• continues to engage with and benefit students
• has a continued focus on enhancement
• aligns with HE Better Regulation Principles
Q 1
RBQA principles
• Maturity of track record of institution – wide assessment of HE determines frequency of review (a risk-based approach)
• Route A: Institutions who have not yet undergone two institution - wide external reviews of HE provision
• Route B: Institutions who have undergone two or more institution wide external reviews of HE provision
• Fast track option for FECs who have undergone IQER to move from Route A to Route B during 2013-15
Q 2
Proposals: Routes A & B
Proposals: period between Review
What should the frequency be?
•Route B: options between 6 to 10 years
•A longer interval than the current 6 years has pros and cons:
• Advantages – further reduces frequency of external assurance for those with maturity of such assessment
• Disadvantages - International reputation and student interest: out of line with review intervals in the rest of UK and rest of Europe; not clear enables enhancement focus; more risk of Q&S failures
Route A frequency would adjust in relation to Route B
Q 4,5
Proposals: Variations in Review
We are consulting about where risk might alter some aspects of review :
• in the nature of review, core and ‘module’ approach
• in intensity
• taking account of PSRB activity
Q 3,6
A risk-based approach needs to be supported by mechanisms to address ‘out of cycle’ Q &S issues that may arise between
Reviews
The QAA Concerns Scheme already acts in this way, we propose:
•Better publicizing QAA’s Concerns Scheme, including to students
•Further OIA and QAA cooperation - ‘Clusters of complaints’
•New annual review of data by a panel, with referral to QAA for further investigation of concerning ‘outliers’:
• What is the data that should be considered?
• The composition of the panel Q 7
Proposals: ‘Triggers’
Students are central to the approach:
• Continued involvement in review
• Ability to invoke QAA Concerns Scheme promoted
• Package of proposals designed to robustly assure reputation and thus protect the student interest
Emphases: Student engagement
Enhancement focus retained:
• Judgment on enhancement of student learning opportunities
• Annual thematic element of Review
• Universal review means the full range of quality and standards will be experienced and good practice will be shared through reports
Emphases: Educational enhancement
The proposals are designed to:
• take forward Government policy
• build on where we are now
• robustly assure quality and standards of English HE
• ensure a continued enhancement focus exists
• ensure the continued international reputation of English HE
• protect the student interest
The consultation is open to anyone to respond
We look forward to hearing from you
Risk-based quality assurance: A summary
• Outcomes will go to the HEFCE Board in October, resulting in a letter of guidance to the QAA
• The outcomes of the consultation will assist the QAA as they consult on the Operational Description for this new approach in December 2012
• New approach comes into force for start of 2013-14, although first reviews will only take place from January 2014.
Next steps