+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Well logging

Well logging

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: clare
View: 52 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
- PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
19
Geophysical neutron logging- tool NNTE for measurements of porosity and rock matrix a - numerical simulations A. Drabina 1) , T. Zorski 2) 1) INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków, Poland 2) AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection
Transcript
Page 1: Well logging

Geophysical neutron logging-tool NNTE

for measurementsof porosity and rock matrix a

- numerical simulations

A. Drabina1), T. Zorski2)

1) INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Polish Academy of Sciences

Kraków, Poland

2) AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFaculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection

Kraków, Poland

Page 2: Well logging

Well logging

Page 3: Well logging

NNTE logging-tool

The prototype logging-tool

made by Polish geophysical prospecting company

is designed to measure in the borehole

2 parameters of a geological formation:

- neutron porosity and

- thermal neutron absorption cross-section, a

Page 4: Well logging

NNTE logging-tool

FAR epithermal neutron detector (3He)

NEARthermal neutron detector (3He)

NEARepithermal neutrondetector (3He)

Am-Be neutron source

NaJ(Tl) natural gamma raydetector

Page 5: Well logging

NNTE logging-tool Principles of the measurement interpretation

neutron porosity evaluation – from the readings of the NEAR epithermal detector, the NEAR thermal detector or from the ratio of the NEAR-to-FAR epithermal detector readings

rock matrixa evaluation – from the difference between the neutron porosity obtained from the NEAR thermal detector and the neutron porosity obtained from the NEAR epithermal detector

Page 6: Well logging

Calibration of the NNTE tool

Experimental calibration

Basic calibration at the calibration facility in Zielona Góra (Poland), property of the GEOFIZYKA KRAKÓW Sp. z o.o.:

1) 21 rock models which represent 3 lithologies (limestone, sandstone and dolomite)

2) 2 borehole diameters (220 mm, 145 mm)

3) 3 NaCl concentrations in the borehole fluid

4) 4 a of the rock matrix

Page 7: Well logging

Experimental calibrationCalibration facility in Zielona Góra (Poland), property of the GEOFIZYKA KRAKÓW Sp. z o. o.

General view

Rock models

Page 8: Well logging

Calibration of the NNTE tool

Numerical calibration

Extension of the calibration onto a wider range of such parameters as

the rock matrix a and

the borehole diameter

Page 9: Well logging

Numerical calibration

Steps of numerical calibration:

1. Modelling of the experimental geometry

Monte Carlo codes used for numerical calculations:

MCNP4C and MCNP5 with ENDF/B-V and ENDF/B-VI neutron libraries

Page 10: Well logging

Modelling of the experimental geometry

NNTE tool

water

rock model

concrete

Page 11: Well logging

Numerical calibration

Steps of numerical calibration:

1. Modelling of the experimental geometry

2. Correlation between the calculation and experimental results (calculations for the rock models of the calibration facility in Zielona Góra)

Monte Carlo codes used for numerical calculations:

MCNP4C and MCNP5 with ENDF/B-V and ENDF/B-VI neutron libraries

Page 12: Well logging

Correlation between the calculation and experimental results

MCNP calculations vs. measurements. NNTE logging-tool "near" thermal detector (B10 admixture to the rock matrix

and S(alpha, beta) scaterring for tarnamid)

y = 462776722,73826x - 61,34043

R2 = 0,96129

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0,E+00 5,E-07 1,E-06 2,E-06 2,E-06 3,E-06 3,E-06 4,E-06 4,E-06 5,E-06 5,E-06

MCNP [number of neutron absorptions per starting particle]

mea

sure

men

t [c

ps]

near thermal detector

MCNP calculations vs. measurements. NNTE logging-tool "near" epithermal detector (B10 admixture to the rock

matrix and S(alpha, beta) scaterring for tarnamid)

y = 91082116,18847x + 5,44365

R2 = 0,98297

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0,E+00 1,E-06 2,E-06 3,E-06 4,E-06 5,E-06 6,E-06 7,E-06 8,E-06 9,E-06 1,E-05

MCNP [number of neutron absorptions per starting particle]

mea

sure

men

t [c

ps]

near epithermal detector

MCNP calculations vs. measurements. NNTE logging-tool "far" epithermal detector (B10 admixture to the rock matrix

and S(alpha, beta) scaterring for tarnamid)

y = 1917400162,90309x + 16,68745

R2 = 0,98182

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0,E+00 1,E-07 2,E-07 3,E-07 4,E-07 5,E-07 6,E-07MCNP [number of neutron absorptions per starting particle]

mea

sure

men

t [c

ps]

far epithermal detector

Page 13: Well logging

Numerical calibration

Steps of numerical calibration:

1. Modelling of the experimental geometry

2. Correlation between the calculation and experimental results (benchmark calculations for the rock models of the calibration facility in Zielona Góra)

3. Creation of the standard calibration curves for a given standard lithology (here: Miocene standard) - calculations for theoretical rock models representing the lithology standard with porosity varying from 0 to 100 %

Monte Carlo codes used for numerical calculations:

MCNP4C and MCNP5 with ENDF/B-V and ENDF/B-VI neutron libraries

Page 14: Well logging

MCNP calculationThe standard calibration curves: Miocene standard

The standard calibration curve for the near thermal detector NNTE logging-tool, Miocene Standard 216mm, 15 c.u.;

MCNP simulation

y = -2,457125629181000E-13x5 + 1,170906518531030E-09x4 -

2,229645827333610E-06x3 + 2,165280121324750E-03x2 - 1,131978616455080E+00x + 2,784379741757920E+02

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400countrate [cps]

po

ros

ity

[%

]

near thermal detector

The standard calibration curve for the near epithermal detector NNTE logging-tool, Miocene Standard 216mm, 15 c.u.;

MCNP simulation

y = -2,626160364831620E-10x5 + 4,145969098393270E-07x4 -

2,587863188993960E-04x3 + 8,028579857542850E-02x2 - 1,256943006003870E+01x + 8,217206293776270E+02

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

countrate [cps]

po

rosi

ty [

%]

near epithermal detector

Page 15: Well logging

Numerical calibration

Steps of numerical calibration:

1. Modelling of the experimental geometry

2. Correlation between the calculation and experimental results (benchmark calculations for the rock models of the calibration facility in Zielona Góra)

3. Creation of the standard calibration curves for a given standard lithology (here: Miocene standard) - calculations for theoretical rock models representing the lithology standard with porosity varying from 0 to 100 %

4. Creation of nomograms for determining the rock matrix a - calculations for theoretical rock models representing the lithology standard with the varying rock matrix a and porosity from 0 to 100 %

Monte Carlo codes used for numerical calculations:

MCNP4C and MCNP5 with ENDF/B-V and ENDF/B-VI neutron libraries

Page 16: Well logging

Nomogram for the rock matrix a evaluation upon the difference between porosity derived from the

NEAR thermal and epithermal detectorsNomogram for the Miocene rock matrix a evaluation. NNTE logging-tool.

PorPozBter [% jsm] is the curve parameter . Borehole diameter is 216 mm. MCNP simulation.

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20DporSigA [%]

a

of

the

Mio

ce

ne

ro

ck

ma

trix

[c

u]

4 [% jsm]

8 [% jsm]

12 [% jsm]

16 [% jsm]

20 [% jsm]

25 [% jsm]

30 [% jsm]

35 [% jsm]

40 [% jsm]

45 [% jsm]

50 [% jsm]

55 [% jsm]

60 [% jsm]

70 [% jsm]

80 [% jsm]

90 [% jsm]

Page 17: Well logging

Prospects for the future

Depth of investigation of the NNTE logging-tool:

observation of behavior of the detector signal while increasing diameter of the rock model

Page 18: Well logging
Page 19: Well logging

The end


Recommended