WESTERN MARXISM and the

FRANKFURT SCHOOL

KEY ISSUES1. What happened to Marxism after Marx?

2. Multiple different Marxisms

3. Changing nature of Western societies

- Why has the revolution not yet happened?

4. New types of Marxism: - FOR understanding new social conditions- Produced BY new social conditions

OUTLINE1. History after Marx

2. “Eastern Marxism”

3. “Western Marxism”

4. New Marxism 1: Georg Lukacs

5. New Marxism 2: Antonio Gramsci- “Hegemony”- (More) Optimistic Marxism

6. New Marxism 3: The Frankfurt School- “Critical Theory”- (More) Pessimistic Marxism

7. Evaluation

History after Marx

• Marx dies in 1883

• Marx’s legacy:

- Intellectual: social theory

- Practical: Socialist movement

(“The International”)

Changing social conditions in the West

1880s to 1930s

1) Appearance of mass media (esp. cheap newspapers) and mass leisure

- Cinema (beginnings of ‘celebrityculture’; beginnings of

‘Americanization’)- Radio (possibilities for propaganda:

Mussolini)

2) Rising working class standards of living

Development of welfare state

Beginnings of mass consumerism

(e.g. USA: mass car ownership by 1930s)

3) Crises in capitalism

Wall Street Crash, 1929 - Large number of businesses go bust- Many capitalists ruined- Mass unemployment- Hyper-inflation

4) Challenges to capitalism

- Communist revolution in Russia, 1917- Increased popularity of Fascism:

Hitler wins power in Germany, 1933

“EASTERN MARXISM”Marxism in the Soviet Union (USSR)

Russian Revolution, 1917

Communist Party attempts to foster democracy

VERSUSCommunist Party keeps all power for

itself

Death of Lenin, 1924

1924 – 1930

Coming to power of Joseph Stalin

1) Opponents killed or sent to prison camps

2) USSR becomes totalitarian

Communist Party has total power

“Cult of Personality” – Stalin as God

3) Marxism becomes official religion of the State: “Dialectical Materialism”

Stalin’s presentation of Marx:

1) Positivism: scientific approach; “facts”

2) Fixed “laws” of social life

3) Inevitability of Communism

4) A State religion - The “Truth”

Beyond criticism

Uncritical of Russian society

Base and Superstructure

- Economy by far the most important of all social institutions

- All other institutions merely products of, and subservient to, the economic base

Economy

All other social institutions

“WESTERN MARXISM”Response in Western

Europe to the Soviet Union

1) Admiration & emulation by some

2) Increasing distrust of Stalin by others

- More information becomes available

- Not communism but totalitarianism

- By late 1930s, Stalin the mirror-image of Hitler

Need to develop a new sort of Marxism:

1) More flexible: not just base creates superstructure (“mechanistic Marxism”)

2) Not a state religion; not dogmatic

- could criticise Communist Party and USSR

3) Attuned to new social conditions

4) DOESN’T claim Communism would emerge inevitably;

- the revolution depends on circumstances

WESTERN MARXISM’S TWO QUESTIONS:

1) Why has the Revolution not yet happened?Physical repression: armed forceIdeological repression: dominant ideologies

Marx: “culture” not very important; merely part of the social superstructure

Western Marxism: “culture” very important; controls how the working classes think

2) What forces are emerging in society that can lead to Revolution?

Georg (Gyorgy) LukacsNeed to develop non-mechanistic Marxism

- Rejects base and superstructure model

Goes back to Hegel

a) Young Marx influenced by Hegel

b) Tension in Marx between active human agency and constraining social structures

c) Hegel emphasises human agency; humans are critical and creative

d) “Hegelian Marxism” – focus on human creativity; change and movement

“Social Totality”

1) Must look at the “whole society”

2) Look at how all parts relate to and effect each other

3) Changes in one part have effects in all other parts

4) The economy INDIRECTLY shapes other parts of the society

5) Other parts of the society can impact on the economy too

“Reification”

1) Develops Marx on alienation & ‘commodity fetishism’

2) Reification = seeing as an objectively existing “thing” what are actually fluid and changing social relationships

3) Capitalist economyEITHER A “thing” with a life and mind of its own

OR Fluid and changing social relationshipsSocial conflicts and new social forces

4) Aim of Marxism: to break through reification; to identify social change, and encourage it

WESTERN MARXISM and the FRANKFURT SCHOOL

RECAP1. Marxism after Marx2. Adapted to fit 20th C conditions e.g. mass media3. Against “Eastern Marxism”- Simplistic base and superstructure model4. “Hegelian” - Lukacs – emphasis on human

creativity5. Why has the revolution not happened?

How might it happen? Antonio Gramsci / The Frankfurt School

Antonio GramsciImprisoned by Mussolini regime

“Prison Notebooks”

Hegelian Marxism:

Emphasis on thoughtful and active human agency (“praxis”)

Why has the Revolution not happened?

1) Physical Force

2) Dominant ideologies

“Hegemony”

Aspect 1: ruling classes control the society

a) Their ideas are the dominant ideas

b) Their ideas successfully repress the ideas of other classes

c) Their ways of thinking shape everyone’s ways of thinking

d) Their rule is seen by everyone as natural and inevitable (“just the way things are”)

Hegemony - Aspect 2:

The rule of the ruling classes is not guaranteedThe rule of the ruling classes is always

potentially threatened:

a) The population can become sceptical(e.g. due to crises in the economy)

b) New “counter-hegemonic” social forces can emerge

(e.g. anti-Iraq War protestors)

c) Disputes within the ruling classes

Not just one ruling class; ruling classES

Different groups within ruling classes

e.g. business leaders, government officials

Must work with each other to retain power

Gramsci’s Conclusions1) ruling classes’ power often quite fragile

2) ruling classes must constantly work to secure their rule

3) ruling classes must try to control counter-hegemonic social forces

4) ruling classes have to negotiate and compromise with the populace

e.g. the welfare state

The Frankfurt School - Members• Institute for Social Research

University of Frankfurt, 1923

• Multi-disciplinary membership:

Max Horkheimer (philosophy)

Theodor Adorno (philosophy and musicology)

Walter Benjamin (philosophy and literature)

Herbert Marcuse (Freudian psychology)

“Critical Theory”Sources:

1) Marx; 2) Max Weber; 3) Sigmund Freud

Following Marx:

Most sorts of social science see only the surface of society

Must find the hidden workings of society

Frankfurt: against positivism

- “scientific” sociology / Durkheim

- can only see surface-level things

Marx: Sociology must be “critical”

- Must be highly sceptical of all claims

- Must get beyond how a society presents itself & understands itself

Internal Critique:

- Compare capitalist society’s claims about itself with the reality of that society

- e.g. freedom for individual / meritocracy

- Show a society’s hypocrisy

- Frankfurt: “negative dialectics”

Updating of Marx

1) Must avoid the flaws of other sorts of sociological theory:

BOTH Theoretical AND Practical

BOTH Theory AND Data

2) Must avoid flaws of “Eastern Marxism”:

- must be open to being corrected by evidence

- must change as society changes

Max Weber:• The “Iron Cage”1) Instrumental rationality- thinking based on calculation- most efficient ways of achieving aims 2) Bureaucracy: rational control over people

Frankfurt view:• “Total administration” - dominance of instrumental rationality- complete bureaucratic control

The main bureaucracies:1) The State2) Capitalist Economy (Monopoly Capitalism)3) Leisure industries & mass media

Mass MediaAdorno and HorkheimerThe “Culture Industry”Mass Culture: standardised culturefor “the masses”

1. Propagates dominant ideologies- audiences influenced- conformist thinking and behaviour

2. Pacifies the populace- superficial pleasures- a break from unfulfilling jobs

3. Outcome: capitalist system reproduced over time

Sigmund Freud

1) Social shaping of individual psychology

- “blank slate”

Frankfurt view (Fromm; Adorno): - psychology shaped by dominant

ideologies e.g. capitalist ideologies

- these make people passive and conformist

2) Social shaping of collective psychology

- a social group e.g. the capitalist class

- a whole society e.g. capitalist society

All societies need to repress individuals’ natural, biological instincts

- sex drives - violent tendencies - uncontrolled egotism &

selfishness

Modern Western (capitalist) societies repress natural instincts very much

PROBLEM - Too much repression:

a) Individual becomes “neurotic”

- Individual is psychologically sick

b) The whole society becomes “neurotic”

- The whole society is psychologically sick

Frankfurt view (Herbert Marcuse – 1960s):1) Capitalist society overly represses natural

instincts2) Individuals in capitalist society are made

neurotic e.g. craving wealth & fame3) The whole society is neurotice.g. happiness = consumer goods4) Encouragement of worst human traits: a) Greed b) Seeing others as objects to be

used c) Hatred of ‘foreigners’ and ‘outsiders’5) Solution: Critical Theory as therapy –

makes society realise its own sickness

EVALUATION 1) Take Weber on “Iron Cage” at face value?- forget it is just a model / ideal type

2) Use of Freud: - assume individual psychology thoroughly

influenced by society- overestimate power of mass media?

3) Overly pessimistic? No hope for social change. Total power of “the System”. (Adorno & Horkheimer; NOT Marcuse)Betray Marxism? Gramsci more appropriate?

Evaluation 2

1. Has Western Marxism improved on Marx’s ideas? Still flawed?

2. Has Western Marxism successfully kept up with social developments?

Has it been able to understand these developments effectively?

Has Marxism been thoroughly outmoded? (e.g. Postmodernism)