+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... ·...

Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... ·...

Date post: 08-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
111
Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Not important Somewhat important Important Very important 2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison Question 1a. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following: practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment FINTERN Lower-Division Faculty 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Not important Somewhat important Important Very important 2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 Upper-Division Faculty
Transcript
Page 1: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1a. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

FINTERN

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 2: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1b. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:community service or volunteer work

FVOLUNTR

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 3: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1c. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:participation in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of

students take two or more classes togetherFLERNCOM

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 4: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1d. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:work on a research project with a faculty

FIMPR05

NOTE: The question was revised after the 2004 administration to request data regarding any faculty member, not necessarily the respondent

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 5: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1e. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:foreign language coursework

FFORLANG

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 6: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1f. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:study abroad

FSTUDYAB

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 7: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1g. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:independent study or self-designed major

FINDST06

NOTE: The question was listed as #1g. "FINDSTUD" and #1h. "FSDMAJOR" for the 2004 administration; as such, 2004 data is shown averaged

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 8: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 1h. How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following:culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)

FSENIOR

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 9: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 2a. Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution: student relationships with other students

FENVSTU

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 10: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 2b. Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution: student relationships with faculty members

FENVFAC

NOTE: The question was listed as #3. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 11: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 2c. Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution: student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

FENVADM

NOTE: The question was listed as #4. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Unfriendly,Unsupportive,

Sense ofAlienation

2 3 4 5 6 7 Friendly,Supportive,

Sense ofBelonging

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 12: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3a. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:requiring students to spend significant amounts of time studying and on academic work

FENVSCHO

NOTE: The question was listed as #5a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 13: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3b. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:providing students the support they need to help them succeed academically

FENVSUPR

NOTE: The question was listed as #5b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 14: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3c. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

FENVDIVR

NOTE: The question was listed as #5c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 15: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3d. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

FENVNACA

NOTE: The question was listed as #5d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 16: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3e. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:providing students the support they need to thrive socially

FENVSOCA

NOTE: The question was listed as #5e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 17: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3f. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications,

student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)FENVACT

NOTE: The question was listed as #5f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 18: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3g. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special speakers,

cultural performances, athletic events, etc.)FENVEVEN

NOTE: The question was listed as #5g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 19: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 3h. To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following:encouraging students to use computers in their academic work

FENVCOMP

NOTE: The question was listed as #5h. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 20: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4a. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:teaching undergraduate students in class

UGTEACH

NOTE: The question was listed as #6a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 21: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4b. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:grading papers and exams

GRADEPAP

NOTE: The question was listed as #6b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 22: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4c. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:giving other forms of written and oral feedback

GRADEBCK

NOTE: The question was listed as #6c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 23: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4d. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:preparing for class

CLASSPRP

NOTE: The question was listed as #6d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 24: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4e. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:reflecting on ways to improve my teaching

REFLECT

NOTE: The question was listed as #6e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 25: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4f. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:research and scholarly activities

SCHOLAR

NOTE: The question was listed as #6f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 26: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4g. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:working with undergraduates on research

FRESEARC

NOTE: The question was listed as #6g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 27: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4h. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:advising undergraduate students

ADVISE

NOTE: The question was listed as #6h. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 28: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4i. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:supervising internships or other field experiences

FIELDEXP

NOTE: The question was listed as #6i. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 29: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4j. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:working with students on activities other than course work (committees, orientation,

student life activities, etc.)FFACOTHR

NOTE: The question was listed as #6j. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 30: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4k. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:other interactions with students outside of the classroom

FINTERAC

NOTE: The question was listed as #6k. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 31: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 4l. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following:conducting service activities

SERVICE

NOTE: The question was listed as #6l. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-30 Morethan 30

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 32: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Classroom, on-campus

Classroom, auxiliarylocation

Distance education

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 5. In what format do you teach your selected course sectionTEACFORM

NOTE: The question was listed as #8. for the 2004 administration (no question #7. existed for the 2004 administration)

** Due to response revision, 2004 data is not comparable with 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 data, so is not reflected in chart **

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Classroom, on-campus

Classroom, auxiliarylocation

Distance education

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 33: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No Yes

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 6. Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campusGENEDREQ

NOTE: The question was not part of the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No Yes

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 34: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

9 or less 10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 99 100 ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 7. How many students are enrolled in your selected course sectionCS05

NOTE: The question was listed as #9. "CRSSIZE" for the 2004 administration

** Due to changes in response parameters, 2004 data was combined for responses "50 to 74" and "75 to 99", and for responses "100 to 149," "150 to 199," and "200 or more" **

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

9 or less 10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 99 100 ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 35: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 to 2 3 to 9 10 to 19 20 or more

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 8. Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected courseCT05

NOTE: The question was listed as #10. "CRSTIMES" for the 2004 administration

** Due to revision of the quantity breakout, 2004 data is not comparable with 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 data, so is not reflected in chart **

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 to 2 3 to 9 10 to 19 20 or more

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 36: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Arts andHumanities

Biologicalscience

Business Education Engineering Physicalscience

Professional Socialscience

Other

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 9. What is the general area of your selected courseCSDISCOL

NOTE: The question was listed as #11. for the 2004 administration, and was not used for 2011

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Arts andHumanities

Biologicalscience

Business Education Engineering Physicalscience

Professional Socialscience

Other

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 37: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10a. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

FCLQUEST

NOTE: The question was listed as #12a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 38: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10b. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments

FCLUNPRE

NOTE: The question was listed as #12b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 39: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10c. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards

FWORKHRD

NOTE: The question was listed as #12c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 40: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10d. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:occasionally use e-mail to communicate with you

FEMAIL

NOTE: The question was listed as #12d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 41: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10e. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:occasionally discuss grades or assignments with you

FGRADE

NOTE: The question was listed as #12e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 42: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10f. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:at least once, talk about career plans

FPLANS

NOTE: The question was listed as #12f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 43: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 10g. About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following:at least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside of class

FIDEAS

NOTE: The question was listed as #12g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75% orhigher

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 44: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11a. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse perspectives

(different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.)FDIVCLAS

NOTE: The question was listed as #13a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 45: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11b. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:work with other students on projects during class

FCLASSGR

NOTE: The question was listed as #13b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 46: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11c. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of your course

FCOMMPRO

NOTE: The question was listed as #13c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 47: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11d. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.)

to discuss or complete an assignmentFITICADE

NOTE: The question was listed as #13d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 48: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11e. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic performance

FFEED

NOTE: The question was listed as #13e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 49: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11f. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:have serious conversations in your course with students of a different race or ethnicity than their own

FDIVRSTU

NOTE: The question was listed as #13f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 50: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 11g. How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following:have serious conversations in your course with students who are very different from them

in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal valuesFDIFFSTU

NOTE: The question was listed as #13g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Never Sometimes Often Very often

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 51: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 12a. In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing doyou assign students: number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings

FREADASG

NOTE: The question was listed as #14a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 52: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 12a. In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing doyou assign students: number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

FWRTMR05

NOTE: The question was listed as #14b. for the 2004 administration

** Due to response revision, 2004 data is not comparable with 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 data, so is not reflected in chart **

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 53: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 12c. In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing doyou assign students: number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

FWRTMD05

NOTE: The question was listed as #14c. for the 2004 administration

** Due to response revision, 2004 data is not comparable with 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 data, so is not reflected in chart **

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 54: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 12d. In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing doyou assign students: number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

FWRITSML

NOTE: The question was listed as #14d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 55: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 13a. In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you requirestudents in your selected course section to complete: number of problem sets that take

your students more than one hour to completeFPROBSTA

NOTE: The question was listed as #15a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 56: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 13b. In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you requirestudents in your selected course section to complete: number of problem sets that

take your students less than one hour to completeFPROBSTB

NOTE: The question was listed as #15b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

None 1 2-3 4-6 More than 6

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 57: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Morethan 12

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 14a. In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you expect your students to spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work,

analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)FEXPREP

NOTE: The question was listed as #16a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Morethan 12

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 58: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Morethan 12

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 14b. In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you think your studentsactually spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or

lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)FEXPREP

NOTE: The question was listed as #16b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Morethan 12

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 59: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15a. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

FREWROPA

NOTE: The question was listed as #17a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 60: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15b. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or information

from various sources FINTEGRA

NOTE: The question was listed as #17b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 61: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15c. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

FOCCGRP

NOTE: The question was listed as #17c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 62: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15d. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing

assignments or during class discussions FINTIDEA

NOTE: The question was listed as #17d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 63: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15e. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (other students,

family members, co-workers, etc.) FOOCID05

NOTE: The question was listed as #17e. for the 2004 administration; slight wording change in the question from 2004 administration (not significant - retains meaning)

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 64: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15f. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

FTUTOR

NOTE: The question was listed as #17f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 65: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15g. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or issue

FOWNVIEW

NOTE: The question not part of the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 66: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15h. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following: try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue

looks from that person's perspective FOTHRVW

NOTE: The question not part of the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 67: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 15i. In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do thefollowing: learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or concept

FCHNGVW

NOTE: The question not part of the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not important Somewhatimportant

Important Very important

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 68: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16a. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: lecture

LECTURE

NOTE: The question was listed as #18a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 69: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16b. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: teacher-led discussion

TEACHLED

NOTE: The question was listed as #18b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 70: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16c. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

TEACHSTU

NOTE: The question was listed as #18c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 71: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16d. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: student computer use

COMPMED

NOTE: The question was listed as #18d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 72: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16e. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: small group activities

GROUPSML

NOTE: The question was listed as #18e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 73: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16f. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: student presentations

STUPRES

NOTE: The question was listed as #18f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 74: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16g. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: in-class writing

CLSWRITE

NOTE: The question was listed as #18g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 75: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16h. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: testing and evaluation

TESTEVAL

NOTE: The question was listed as #18h. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 76: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16i. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: performances in applied and fine arts (e.g., dance, drama, music)

PERFORM

NOTE: The question was listed as #18i. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 77: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 16j. In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time isspent on the following: experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.)

EXPERIEN

NOTE: The question was listed as #18j. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 1-9% 10-19% 20-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-74% 75% ormore

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 78: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Verylittle

2 3 4 5 6 7 Verymuch

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 17. Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluationsof student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected

course section to do their best workFEXAMS

NOTE: The question was listed as #19. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 Verylittle

2 3 4 5 6 7 Verymuch

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 79: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 18a. In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engagingstudents in the following mental activity: memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and

readings so students can repeat them pretty much in the same formFMEMORIZ

NOTE: The question was listed as #20a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 80: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 18b. In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engagingstudents in the following mental activity: analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory,

such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its componentsFANALYZE

NOTE: The question was listed as #20b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 81: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 18c. In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engagingstudents in the following mental activity: synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or

experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationshipsFSYNTHES

NOTE: The question was listed as #20c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 82: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 18d. In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engaging students in the following mental activity: making judgments about the value of information, arguments or methods such as

examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusionsFEVALUAT

NOTE: The question was listed as #20d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 83: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 18e. In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engagingstudents in the following mental activity: applying theories or concepts to practical

problems or in new situationsFAPPLYIN

NOTE: The question was listed as #20e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 84: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19a. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: writing clearly and effectively

FGNWRITE

NOTE: The question was listed as #21a. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 85: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19b. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: speaking clearly and effectively

FGNSPEAK

NOTE: The question was listed as #21b. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 86: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19c. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: thinking critically and analytically

FGNANALY

NOTE: The question was listed as #21c. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 87: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19d. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: analyzing quantitative problems

FGNQUANT

NOTE: The question was listed as #21d. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 88: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19e. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: using computing and information technology

FGNCMPTS

NOTE: The question was listed as #21e. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 89: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19f. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: working effectively with others

FGNOTHER

NOTE: The question was listed as #21f. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 90: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19g. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: learning effectively on their own

FGNINQ

NOTE: The question was listed as #21g. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 91: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19h. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: understanding themselves

FGNSELF

NOTE: The question was listed as #21h. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 92: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19i. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

FGNDIVER

NOTE: The question was listed as #21i. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 93: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19j. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: solving complex real-world problems

FGNPROBS

NOTE: The question was listed as #21j. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 94: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19k. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: developing a personal code of values and ethics

FVALUES

NOTE: The question was listed as #21k. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 95: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19l. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: developing a deepened sense of spirituality

FSPIRIT

NOTE: The question was listed as #21l. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 96: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19m. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: acquiring a broad general education

FGNGENLE

NOTE: The question was listed as #21m. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 97: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 19n. To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following area: acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

FGNWORK

NOTE: The question was listed as #21n. for the 2004 administration

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Very little Some Quite a bit Very much

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 98: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Arts andhumanities

Biologicalscience

Business Education Engineering Physicalscience

Professional Socialscience

Other

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

FSSE Engagement Item Frequency Distribution Comparison

Question 20. What is the general discipline of your academic appointmentAPDISCOL

NOTE: The question was listed as #25. for the 2004 administration; part of the demographic questions

Lower-Division Faculty

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Arts andhumanities

Biologicalscience

Business Education Engineering Physicalscience

Professional Socialscience

Other

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

Upper-Division Faculty

Page 99: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 99 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %1a. FINTERN Not important 6 6% 3 2% 13 5% 5 3% 8 5% 10 6% 9 4% 10 3% 10 3% 8 3% 3 1% 4 2%

Somewhat important 20 21% 20 16% 42 16% 26 14% 20 13% 25 16% 22 10% 47 15% 31 10% 26 10% 32 11% 19 8%Important 28 29% 35 28% 85 32% 52 28% 46 30% 47 30% 64 28% 71 23% 73 23% 65 24% 56 20% 57 25%Very important 41 43% 65 53% 125 47% 104 56% 78 51% 76 48% 135 59% 186 59% 206 64% 170 63% 192 68% 145 64%Total 95 100% 123 100% 265 100% 187 100% 152 100% 158 100% 230 100% 314 100% 320 100% 269 100% 283 100% 225 100%

1b. FVOLUNTR Not important 14 15% 9 7% 30 11% 17 9% 18 12% 21 13% 33 14% 37 12% 31 10% 20 8% 24 9% 18 8%Somewhat important 38 40% 50 41% 88 33% 56 30% 50 33% 46 29% 68 30% 117 37% 102 32% 90 34% 87 31% 75 33%Important 24 25% 45 37% 97 37% 72 38% 60 39% 56 35% 88 38% 105 33% 116 36% 93 35% 100 36% 70 31%Very important 19 20% 18 15% 50 19% 43 23% 25 16% 36 23% 40 17% 55 18% 72 22% 63 24% 68 24% 63 28%Total 95 100% 122 100% 265 100% 188 100% 153 100% 159 100% 229 100% 314 100% 321 100% 266 101% 279 100% 226 100%

1c. FLERNCOM Not important 23 24% 24 20% 49 18% 29 16% 32 21% 30 19% 51 22% 51 16% 43 13% 42 16% 35 12% 29 13%Somewhat important 33 35% 46 38% 81 31% 60 32% 48 31% 49 31% 71 31% 118 38% 96 30% 76 29% 84 30% 65 29%Important 21 22% 33 27% 93 35% 65 35% 43 28% 53 34% 60 26% 79 25% 117 37% 88 33% 97 34% 89 40%Very important 17 18% 19 16% 42 16% 33 18% 31 20% 25 16% 48 21% 66 21% 63 20% 60 23% 66 23% 42 19%Total 94 100% 122 100% 265 100% 187 100% 154 100% 157 100% 230 100% 314 100% 319 100% 266 101% 282 100% 225 100%

1d. FIMPR05 Not important 20 21% 14 11% 36 14% 10 5% 20 13% 20 13% 50 22% 37 12% 40 13% 38 14% 36 13% 24 11%Somewhat important 36 38% 43 35% 84 32% 69 37% 57 37% 54 34% 73 32% 107 34% 115 36% 93 35% 90 32% 88 39%Important 25 27% 47 39% 86 32% 72 38% 54 35% 55 35% 67 29% 114 36% 110 34% 82 31% 96 34% 83 37%

NOTE: slight change in question wording from 2004 admin Very important 13 14% 18 15% 59 22% 38 20% 24 15% 30 19% 40 17% 55 18% 54 17% 55 21% 60 21% 30 13%Total 94 100% 122 100% 265 100% 189 100% 155 100% 159 100% 230 100% 313 100% 319 100% 268 101% 282 100% 225 100%

1e. FFORLANG Not important 12 13% 13 11% 40 15% 22 12% 16 11% 18 11% 36 16% 39 12% 31 10% 31 12% 33 12% 25 11%Somewhat important 31 33% 36 29% 89 34% 58 31% 52 34% 56 35% 67 30% 110 35% 124 39% 78 29% 77 27% 68 30%Important 27 28% 46 37% 73 28% 63 34% 55 36% 44 28% 80 35% 99 32% 97 30% 93 35% 94 33% 81 36%Very important 25 26% 28 23% 63 24% 45 24% 29 19% 40 25% 44 19% 66 21% 69 21% 66 25% 77 27% 51 23%Total 95 100% 123 100% 265 100% 188 100% 152 100% 158 100% 227 100% 314 100% 321 100% 268 101% 281 100% 225 100%

1f. FSTUDYAB Not important 15 16% 13 11% 55 21% 28 15% 29 19% 27 17% 48 21% 56 18% 54 17% 43 16% 32 11% 26 12%Somewhat important 37 39% 48 40% 93 35% 62 33% 56 36% 56 36% 84 37% 118 38% 135 42% 94 35% 109 39% 84 38%Important 26 27% 32 26% 74 28% 60 32% 42 27% 43 28% 61 27% 81 26% 86 27% 84 32% 78 28% 73 33%Very important 17 18% 28 23% 41 16% 38 20% 27 18% 30 19% 37 16% 58 19% 45 14% 45 17% 63 22% 41 18%Total 95 100% 121 100% 263 100% 188 100% 154 100% 156 100% 230 100% 313 100% 320 100% 266 100% 282 100% 224 100%

1g. FINDST06 Not important 31 32% 40 33% 61 23% 43 23% 39 26% 47 30% 76 33% 92 29% 91 28% 75 28% 77 27% 74 33%Somewhat important 33 36% 46 38% 100 38% 81 43% 63 41% 59 38% 69 30% 117 37% 120 38% 100 37% 107 38% 79 35%

** 2004 data is averaged -- see below for actual response rates ** Important 23 24% 27 22% 78 29% 49 26% 39 26% 34 22% 56 24% 74 24% 87 27% 72 27% 58 21% 51 23%(was #1g. "FINDSTUD" and #1h. "FSDMAJOR" for 2004 admin) Very important 8 8% 9 7% 26 10% 16 8% 11 7% 17 11% 29 13% 31 10% 22 7% 21 8% 40 14% 22 10%

Total 95 100% 122 100% 265 100% 189 100% 152 100% 157 100% 230 100% 314 100% 320 100% 268 100% 282 100% 226 100%1h. FSENIOR Not important 9 10% 4 3% 8 3% 5 3% 7 5% 7 4% 17 7% 9 3% 11 3% 15 6% 3 1% 10 4%

Somewhat important 27 29% 16 13% 52 20% 21 11% 18 12% 17 11% 50 22% 47 15% 53 17% 34 13% 32 11% 31 14%Important 34 36% 40 33% 110 42% 79 42% 65 42% 67 42% 83 36% 96 31% 102 32% 94 35% 94 33% 81 36%Very important 24 26% 62 51% 95 36% 82 44% 64 42% 67 42% 79 34% 162 52% 154 48% 126 47% 152 54% 103 46%Total 94 100% 122 100% 265 100% 187 100% 154 100% 158 100% 229 100% 314 100% 320 100% 269 101% 281 100% 225 100%

2a. FENVSTU 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%2 2 2% 2 2% 7 3% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 4 2% 3 1% 1 0% 1 0% 3 1% 2 1%3 9 10% 6 5% 12 5% 7 4% 7 5% 4 3% 5 2% 17 5% 18 6% 14 5% 8 3% 7 3%4 30 32% 22 18% 45 17% 37 20% 27 17% 31 20% 38 17% 56 18% 56 17% 39 15% 29 10% 33 14%5 30 32% 40 33% 99 37% 60 32% 59 38% 66 42% 88 38% 101 32% 92 29% 75 28% 99 35% 67 29%6 17 18% 40 33% 81 30% 62 33% 47 30% 43 27% 67 29% 105 33% 109 34% 107 40% 113 40% 94 41%7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 5 5% 13 11% 22 8% 22 12% 13 8% 14 9% 28 12% 32 10% 45 14% 30 11% 31 11% 25 11%Total 94 100% 123 100% 266 100% 188 100% 155 100% 158 100% 230 100% 314 100% 321 100% 266 99% 283 100% 228 100%

2b. FENVFAC 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 1 1% 1 1% 3 1% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0%2 2 2% 2 2% 6 2% 1 1% 1 1% 4 3% 6 3% 7 2% 5 2% 7 3% 3 1% 7 3%3 11 12% 8 7% 21 8% 12 6% 7 5% 7 4% 22 10% 20 6% 26 8% 9 3% 13 5% 10 4%4 22 23% 19 16% 64 24% 34 18% 30 19% 41 26% 32 14% 49 16% 63 20% 48 18% 42 15% 31 14%5 34 36% 39 32% 86 32% 61 32% 54 35% 52 33% 65 28% 98 31% 99 31% 94 35% 89 31% 77 34%6 16 17% 43 35% 67 25% 60 32% 51 33% 40 25% 78 34% 111 35% 82 26% 80 30% 95 33% 78 34%

(was #3. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 9 9% 10 8% 18 7% 19 10% 11 7% 13 8% 26 11% 29 9% 46 14% 28 10% 41 14% 25 11%Total 95 100% 122 100% 265 100% 188 100% 155 100% 157 100% 230 100% 314 100% 321 100% 268 100% 284 100% 228 100%

2c. FENVADM 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 7 8% 6 5% 11 4% 6 3% 7 5% 4 3% 13 6% 18 6% 14 4% 7 3% 9 3% 7 3%2 17 18% 12 10% 31 12% 7 4% 18 12% 10 6% 37 16% 43 14% 42 13% 36 14% 27 10% 13 6%3 16 17% 30 25% 37 14% 28 15% 27 18% 25 16% 32 14% 62 20% 61 19% 40 15% 38 14% 32 15%4 24 26% 39 33% 71 27% 50 27% 26 17% 51 32% 57 25% 84 27% 73 23% 63 24% 71 25% 54 25%5 17 18% 20 17% 66 25% 46 25% 37 24% 41 26% 50 22% 57 18% 61 19% 56 21% 67 24% 61 28%6 9 10% 7 6% 37 14% 32 17% 30 19% 21 13% 23 10% 38 12% 47 15% 43 16% 48 17% 40 18%

(was #4. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 2 2% 5 4% 10 4% 15 8% 9 6% 6 4% 13 6% 9 3% 18 6% 17 6% 20 7% 12 5%Total 92 100% 119 100% 263 100% 184 100% 154 100% 158 100% 225 100% 311 100% 316 100% 262 99% 280 100% 219 100%

3a. FENVSCHO Very little 12 13% 13 11% 28 11% 12 6% 7 5% 11 7% 26 11% 32 10% 30 9% 25 9% 27 10% 25 11%Some 38 41% 44 36% 82 31% 60 32% 56 37% 52 33% 80 35% 113 36% 104 33% 81 30% 90 32% 74 33%Quite a bit 30 32% 52 43% 108 41% 76 41% 61 40% 68 43% 80 35% 122 39% 139 43% 112 42% 104 37% 95 42%

(was #5a. for 2004 admin) Very much 13 14% 13 11% 48 18% 39 21% 29 19% 27 17% 44 19% 46 15% 47 15% 48 18% 60 21% 30 13%Total 93 100% 122 100% 266 100% 187 100% 153 100% 158 100% 230 100% 313 100% 320 100% 266 99% 281 100% 224 100%

3b. FENVSUPR Very little 8 8% 6 5% 8 3% 2 1% 4 3% 3 2% 12 5% 18 6% 12 4% 19 7% 16 6% 12 5%Some 32 34% 51 41% 75 28% 45 24% 45 29% 44 28% 82 36% 120 38% 84 26% 77 29% 76 27% 72 32%Quite a bit 40 42% 53 43% 121 45% 87 47% 65 42% 70 44% 88 38% 115 37% 158 49% 108 40% 116 41% 88 39%

(was #5b. for 2004 admin) Very much 15 16% 13 11% 62 23% 53 28% 41 26% 42 26% 47 21% 59 19% 67 21% 63 24% 75 27% 52 23%Total 95 100% 123 100% 266 100% 187 100% 155 100% 159 100% 229 100% 312 100% 321 100% 267 100% 283 100% 224 100%

3c. FENVDIVR Very little 24 26% 30 25% 46 17% 27 15% 20 13% 17 11% 42 18% 63 20% 45 14% 49 18% 36 13% 21 9%Some 45 48% 56 46% 114 43% 73 39% 65 42% 70 44% 120 53% 153 49% 152 48% 120 45% 110 39% 99 44%

Student relationships with faculty members

Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Requiring students to spend significant amounts

Providing students the support they need to help

Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

Work on a research project with a faculty

Foreign language coursework

Study abroad

Independent study or self-designed major

Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)

Student relationships with other students

2011

Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Community service or volunteer work

Participation in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

Page 100: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 100 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

Quite a bit 21 23% 34 28% 72 27% 60 32% 44 29% 49 31% 38 17% 70 22% 87 28% 69 26% 94 34% 76 34%(was #5c. for 2004 admin) Very much 3 3% 2 2% 32 12% 26 14% 24 16% 23 14% 28 12% 26 8% 31 10% 27 10% 40 14% 28 13%

Total 93 100% 122 100% 264 100% 186 100% 153 100% 159 100% 228 100% 312 100% 315 100% 265 99% 280 100% 224 100%3d. FENVNACA Very little 29 31% 39 32% 62 23% 32 17% 25 16% 21 13% 74 33% 94 30% 83 26% 60 23% 55 20% 35 16%

Some 49 53% 64 53% 130 49% 85 45% 83 54% 97 61% 99 44% 163 52% 160 51% 134 51% 131 47% 124 56%Quite a bit 14 15% 17 14% 56 21% 57 30% 35 23% 35 22% 44 20% 44 14% 61 19% 56 21% 70 25% 50 23%

(was #5d. for 2004 admin) Very much 1 1% 1 1% 16 6% 13 7% 11 7% 6 4% 8 4% 10 3% 12 4% 12 5% 23 8% 12 5%Total 93 100% 121 100% 264 100% 187 100% 154 100% 159 100% 225 100% 311 100% 316 100% 262 100% 279 100% 221 100%

3e. FENVSOCA Very little 24 26% 20 17% 34 13% 20 11% 19 13% 17 11% 43 19% 60 20% 46 15% 31 12% 35 13% 18 8%Some 51 55% 78 66% 125 48% 90 48% 73 48% 77 49% 120 53% 176 57% 162 51% 133 52% 138 50% 119 54%Quite a bit 14 15% 18 15% 91 35% 56 30% 46 30% 53 34% 52 23% 63 21% 89 28% 80 31% 84 30% 68 31%

(was #5e. for 2004 admin) Very much 3 3% 2 2% 13 5% 20 11% 14 9% 11 7% 11 5% 8 3% 18 6% 14 5% 19 7% 15 7%Total 92 100% 118 100% 263 100% 186 100% 152 100% 158 100% 226 100% 307 100% 315 100% 258 100% 276 100% 220 100%

3f. FENVACT Very little 9 10% 13 11% 14 5% 11 6% 7 5% 12 8% 16 7% 23 7% 19 6% 14 5% 20 7% 18 8%Some 46 50% 60 49% 112 42% 61 33% 53 35% 62 39% 102 46% 142 46% 132 42% 101 39% 103 37% 77 35%Quite a bit 34 37% 44 36% 96 36% 80 43% 68 44% 65 41% 86 39% 119 39% 127 40% 112 43% 110 39% 90 41%

(was #5f. for 2004 admin) Very much 3 3% 6 5% 43 16% 34 18% 25 16% 19 12% 19 9% 24 8% 36 11% 35 13% 48 17% 34 16%Total 92 100% 123 100% 265 100% 186 100% 153 100% 158 100% 223 100% 308 100% 314 100% 262 100% 281 100% 219 100%

3g. FENVEVEN Very little 15 16% 13 11% 19 7% 12 6% 9 6% 12 8% 24 11% 32 10% 24 8% 17 6% 19 7% 19 9%Some 38 41% 52 43% 95 36% 57 31% 51 33% 53 34% 92 41% 138 44% 122 39% 67 25% 99 36% 83 37%Quite a bit 37 40% 46 38% 106 40% 84 45% 62 40% 69 44% 79 35% 112 36% 124 39% 135 51% 109 39% 83 37%

(was #5g. for 2004 admin) Very much 2 2% 11 9% 42 16% 32 17% 32 21% 23 15% 29 13% 29 9% 46 15% 46 17% 50 18% 38 17%Total 92 100% 122 100% 262 100% 185 100% 154 100% 157 100% 224 100% 311 100% 316 100% 265 99% 277 100% 223 100%

3h. FENVCOMP Very little 1 1% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 2 1% 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% 4 1% 4 1% 3 1% 3 1%Some 8 9% 8 7% 16 6% 13 7% 19 12% 23 15% 20 9% 18 6% 28 9% 23 9% 22 8% 28 12%Quite a bit 34 36% 45 37% 118 45% 61 33% 51 33% 51 32% 90 39% 124 40% 113 35% 86 32% 87 31% 83 37%

(was #5h. for 2004 admin) Very much 51 54% 69 57% 129 49% 111 60% 83 54% 83 53% 116 51% 167 54% 174 55% 154 58% 172 61% 113 50%Total 94 100% 122 100% 265 100% 185 100% 155 100% 158 100% 228 100% 312 100% 319 100% 267 100% 284 100% 227 100%

4a. UGTEACH 0 1 1% 3 2% 15 6% 3 2% 2 1% 0 0% 11 5% 7 2% 5 2% 2 1% 5 2% 5 2%1-4 24 25% 20 16% 105 40% 57 30% 44 28% 44 28% 43 19% 56 18% 102 32% 82 30% 83 29% 81 36%5-8 32 34% 51 41% 100 38% 82 44% 66 43% 59 37% 89 39% 123 39% 112 35% 110 41% 96 34% 81 36%9-12 28 29% 31 25% 30 11% 25 13% 28 18% 41 26% 55 24% 98 31% 67 21% 53 20% 71 25% 41 18%13-16 7 7% 10 8% 10 4% 13 7% 8 5% 6 4% 16 7% 18 6% 23 7% 10 4% 14 5% 13 6%17-20 1 1% 7 6% 2 1% 4 2% 3 2% 4 3% 10 4% 10 3% 7 2% 8 3% 8 3% 4 2%21-30 2 2% 1 1% 3 1% 3 2% 4 3% 4 3% 4 2% 1 0% 3 1% 4 1% 6 2% 2 1%

(was #6a. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%Total 95 100% 123 100% 265 100% 187 100% 155 100% 158 100% 229 100% 315 100% 319 100% 269 100% 283 100% 228 100%

4b. GRADEPAP 0 4 4% 6 5% 11 4% 2 1% 4 3% 1 1% 7 3% 6 2% 6 2% 2 1% 4 1% 4 2%1-4 33 35% 38 31% 121 46% 94 50% 62 40% 57 36% 89 39% 98 31% 132 41% 112 42% 98 35% 90 39%5-8 32 34% 43 35% 88 33% 54 29% 49 32% 65 41% 77 34% 118 37% 103 32% 90 33% 98 35% 78 34%9-12 15 16% 25 20% 25 9% 20 11% 23 15% 17 11% 38 17% 59 19% 47 15% 34 13% 42 15% 27 12%13-16 6 6% 6 5% 11 4% 8 4% 12 8% 8 5% 14 6% 21 7% 18 6% 16 6% 23 8% 18 8%17-20 3 3% 4 3% 7 3% 8 4% 3 2% 4 3% 2 1% 9 3% 10 3% 11 4% 9 3% 3 1%21-30 1 1% 1 1% 1 0% 1 1% 2 1% 5 3% 2 1% 2 1% 4 1% 2 1% 7 2% 5 2%

(was #6b. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0% 3 1%Total 94 100% 123 100% 265 100% 188 100% 155 100% 158 100% 229 100% 315 100% 321 100% 269 101% 282 100% 228 100%

4c. GRADEBCK 0 2 2% 4 3% 16 6% 5 3% 5 3% 0 0% 7 3% 4 1% 8 3% 3 1% 5 2% 4 2%1-4 53 56% 64 52% 181 69% 124 66% 90 58% 93 59% 108 47% 155 49% 200 63% 161 60% 136 48% 132 58%5-8 28 30% 38 31% 48 18% 47 25% 38 25% 49 31% 76 33% 104 33% 71 22% 65 24% 83 29% 61 27%9-12 5 5% 10 8% 8 3% 8 4% 14 9% 9 6% 28 12% 29 9% 21 7% 28 10% 27 10% 14 6%13-16 3 3% 4 3% 5 2% 2 1% 5 3% 3 2% 5 2% 15 5% 9 3% 6 2% 22 8% 10 4%17-20 2 2% 2 2% 1 0% 0 0% 2 1% 4 3% 4 2% 3 1% 5 2% 3 1% 3 1% 1 0%21-30 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 2 1% 3 1% 4 2%

(was #6c. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0% 3 1% 2 1%Total 94 100% 122 100% 261 100% 188 100% 154 100% 158 100% 229 100% 314 100% 316 100% 268 99% 282 100% 228 100%

4d. CLASSPRP 0 0 0% 3 2% 11 4% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 5 2% 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1%1-4 21 22% 21 17% 116 44% 64 34% 46 30% 39 25% 44 19% 50 16% 94 29% 86 32% 69 24% 66 29%5-8 43 45% 39 32% 91 34% 75 40% 51 33% 68 43% 87 38% 128 41% 134 42% 91 34% 105 37% 94 41%9-12 21 22% 36 29% 26 10% 27 14% 35 23% 31 20% 49 21% 70 22% 60 19% 56 21% 60 21% 34 15%13-16 7 7% 10 8% 11 4% 13 7% 9 6% 13 8% 29 13% 36 11% 15 5% 19 7% 28 10% 17 7%17-20 1 1% 10 8% 7 3% 5 3% 8 5% 4 3% 9 4% 19 6% 11 3% 9 3% 12 4% 10 4%21-30 1 1% 2 2% 2 1% 4 2% 2 1% 3 2% 4 2% 6 2% 3 1% 6 2% 4 1% 4 2%

(was #6d. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1 1% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% 3 2% 0 0% 2 1% 4 1% 2 1% 2 1% 5 2% 1 0%Total 95 100% 123 100% 264 100% 188 100% 155 100% 158 100% 229 100% 315 100% 321 100% 269 100% 284 100% 228 100%

4e. REFLECT 0 1 1% 3 2% 19 7% 0 0% 4 3% 3 2% 4 2% 4 1% 11 3% 2 1% 2 1% 1 0%1-4 65 68% 83 68% 187 71% 136 72% 110 71% 105 67% 160 70% 207 66% 227 71% 195 73% 204 73% 161 72%5-8 19 20% 28 23% 39 15% 36 19% 27 17% 33 21% 39 17% 69 22% 58 18% 41 15% 52 19% 48 21%9-12 5 5% 4 3% 11 4% 9 5% 7 5% 6 4% 13 6% 17 5% 13 4% 16 6% 12 4% 5 2%13-16 3 3% 2 2% 3 1% 2 1% 2 1% 7 4% 6 3% 8 3% 2 1% 5 2% 1 0% 3 1%17-20 2 2% 0 0% 1 0% 1 1% 4 3% 1 1% 4 2% 2 1% 3 1% 3 1% 3 1% 1 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 3 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 4 1% 1 0% 2 1%

(was #6e. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 2 2% 1 0% 1 1% 1 1% 1 1% 2 1% 4 1% 4 1% 1 0% 5 2% 4 2%Total 95 100% 122 100% 263 100% 188 100% 155 100% 156 100% 228 100% 312 100% 320 100% 267 99% 280 100% 225 100%

4f. SCHOLAR 0 7 7% 7 6% 33 12% 15 8% 20 13% 11 7% 6 3% 11 4% 25 8% 16 6% 12 4% 17 8%1-4 25 26% 37 31% 63 24% 60 32% 45 29% 44 28% 45 20% 54 17% 94 29% 72 27% 83 30% 64 29%5-8 26 27% 21 17% 46 17% 34 18% 33 21% 29 19% 61 27% 63 20% 51 16% 60 22% 57 20% 52 23%

Teaching undergraduate students in class

Grading papers and exams

Giving other forms of written and oral feedback

Preparing for class

Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching

Research and scholarly activities

Providing students the support they need

Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.)

Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work

Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

Page 101: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 101 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

9-12 11 11% 21 17% 44 17% 22 12% 17 11% 20 13% 44 19% 62 20% 49 15% 41 15% 39 14% 33 15%13-16 6 6% 11 9% 25 9% 15 8% 10 6% 13 8% 20 9% 35 11% 29 9% 24 9% 27 10% 29 13%17-20 9 9% 8 7% 20 8% 22 12% 12 8% 22 14% 26 11% 41 13% 37 12% 19 7% 22 8% 11 5%21-30 9 9% 7 6% 20 8% 15 8% 10 6% 10 6% 11 5% 26 8% 20 6% 19 7% 23 8% 7 3%

(was #6f. for 2004 admin) More than 30 3 3% 9 7% 14 5% 4 2% 7 5% 7 4% 15 7% 20 6% 16 5% 16 6% 17 6% 10 4%Total 96 100% 121 100% 265 100% 187 100% 154 100% 156 100% 228 100% 312 100% 321 100% 267 99% 280 100% 223 100%

4g. FRESEARC 0 48 51% 52 43% 156 59% 108 58% 91 59% 80 52% 94 41% 108 35% 156 49% 124 46% 113 40% 110 49%1-4 34 36% 45 37% 78 30% 55 30% 45 29% 55 35% 86 38% 134 43% 115 36% 95 36% 116 41% 94 42%5-8 8 8% 13 11% 20 8% 13 7% 13 8% 9 6% 26 11% 54 17% 30 9% 33 12% 29 10% 13 6%9-12 3 3% 2 2% 6 2% 5 3% 1 1% 3 2% 13 6% 9 3% 9 3% 9 3% 12 4% 5 2%13-16 1 1% 4 3% 2 1% 3 2% 3 2% 4 3% 5 2% 3 1% 6 2% 3 1% 6 2% 2 1%17-20 1 1% 4 3% 0 0% 2 1% 1 1% 3 2% 3 1% 1 0% 3 1% 3 1% 3 1% 0 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

(was #6g. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0%Total 95 100% 121 100% 264 100% 186 100% 154 100% 155 100% 228 100% 310 100% 319 100% 267 99% 280 100% 225 100%

4h. ADVISE 0 38 40% 38 32% 116 44% 80 43% 57 37% 63 41% 57 25% 62 20% 101 32% 87 33% 74 26% 68 30%1-4 48 51% 61 51% 107 41% 82 44% 68 44% 67 43% 114 50% 175 56% 158 50% 129 48% 139 50% 117 52%5-8 8 8% 11 9% 19 7% 12 6% 14 9% 12 8% 41 18% 53 17% 37 12% 37 14% 41 15% 24 11%9-12 0 0% 4 3% 5 2% 7 4% 6 4% 6 4% 12 5% 13 4% 16 5% 10 4% 17 6% 9 4%13-16 0 0% 3 3% 6 2% 3 2% 3 2% 6 4% 2 1% 7 2% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 4 2%17-20 1 1% 0 0% 1 0% 1 1% 5 3% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 3 1% 1 0%21-30 0 0% 1 1% 4 2% 2 1% 1 1% 1 1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0%

(was #6h. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 2 2% 6 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 3 1% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0%Total 95 100% 120 100% 264 100% 187 100% 154 100% 155 100% 229 100% 313 100% 319 100% 266 100% 280 100% 224 100%

4i. FIELDEXP 0 57 60% 80 66% 195 74% 153 82% 117 76% 110 71% 109 48% 165 53% 185 58% 164 61% 162 57% 128 56%1-4 21 22% 29 24% 51 19% 26 14% 22 14% 23 15% 64 28% 92 30% 84 26% 60 22% 69 24% 67 29%5-8 13 14% 9 7% 13 5% 5 3% 9 6% 13 8% 31 14% 26 8% 23 7% 25 9% 27 10% 18 8%9-12 2 2% 1 1% 2 1% 1 1% 1 1% 1 1% 11 5% 17 5% 17 5% 14 5% 10 4% 8 4%13-16 1 1% 2 2% 2 1% 1 1% 2 1% 4 3% 2 1% 7 2% 5 2% 3 1% 4 1% 3 1%17-20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 2 1% 1 0% 3 1% 3 1% 1 0% 5 2% 1 0%21-30 1 1% 1 1% 1 0% 1 1% 2 1% 1 1% 5 2% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 4 1% 3 1%

(was #6i. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0%Total 95 100% 122 100% 265 100% 187 100% 154 100% 154 100% 226 100% 311 100% 319 100% 268 98% 282 100% 228 100%

4j. FFACOTHR 0 46 49% 56 46% 146 55% 108 58% 77 50% 86 56% 87 38% 104 33% 129 41% 124 46% 121 43% 124 54%1-4 42 45% 59 48% 88 33% 64 34% 66 43% 57 37% 108 47% 165 53% 150 47% 115 43% 127 45% 88 39%5-8 3 3% 4 3% 19 7% 11 6% 9 6% 6 4% 24 10% 34 11% 25 8% 22 8% 28 10% 12 5%9-12 1 1% 1 1% 4 2% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 7 3% 6 2% 7 2% 5 2% 3 1% 2 1%13-16 2 2% 1 1% 3 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 3 1% 2 1% 3 1% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0%17-20 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0%

(was #6j. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 3 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0%Total 94 100% 122 100% 265 100% 187 100% 154 100% 154 100% 229 100% 312 100% 317 100% 269 100% 280 100% 228 100%

4k. FINTERAC 0 12 13% 20 16% 79 30% 45 24% 39 25% 36 23% 43 19% 45 14% 76 24% 64 24% 53 19% 65 29%1-4 63 66% 83 68% 145 55% 110 59% 81 53% 99 63% 140 61% 186 59% 202 63% 156 58% 178 63% 134 60%5-8 15 16% 13 11% 27 10% 23 12% 24 16% 14 9% 29 13% 62 20% 19 6% 33 12% 32 11% 20 9%9-12 4 4% 3 2% 4 2% 4 2% 4 3% 3 2% 11 5% 11 4% 12 4% 8 3% 15 5% 3 1%13-16 0 0% 1 1% 4 2% 3 2% 4 3% 3 2% 4 2% 5 2% 5 2% 2 1% 1 0% 2 1%17-20 2 2% 1 1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 1 0% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 3 1% 3 2% 2 1% 1 1% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 1 0%

(was #6k. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 3 1% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 96 100% 122 100% 265 100% 188 100% 154 100% 157 100% 230 100% 313 100% 319 100% 267 99% 281 100% 225 100%

4l. SERVICE 0 19 20% 31 25% 139 53% 76 41% 67 43% 70 45% 43 19% 45 15% 115 36% 93 35% 89 32% 87 38%1-4 41 43% 49 40% 80 30% 80 43% 57 37% 56 36% 100 44% 147 47% 108 34% 93 35% 110 39% 81 36%5-8 22 23% 33 27% 27 10% 21 11% 23 15% 21 13% 54 24% 76 25% 57 18% 53 20% 50 18% 34 15%9-12 11 12% 4 3% 11 4% 8 4% 6 4% 6 4% 20 9% 26 8% 21 7% 13 5% 20 7% 14 6%13-16 0 0% 3 2% 3 1% 2 1% 1 1% 3 2% 6 3% 7 2% 8 3% 7 3% 3 1% 2 1%17-20 1 1% 3 2% 3 1% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 4 2% 6 2% 5 2% 4 2% 5 2% 5 2%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0% 3 1% 2 1% 2 1%

(was #6l. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 3 1% 2 1%Total 95 100% 123 100% 263 100% 187 100% 155 100% 157 100% 229 100% 310 100% 317 100% 266 101% 282 100% 227 100%

5. In what format do you teach your selected course section? TEACFORM Classroom, on-campus 120 98% 259 97% 187 99% 152 98% 150 95% 301 96% 300 94% 252 94% 265 93% 214 94%** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** Classroom, auxiliary location 2 2% 6 2% 1 1% 0 0% 1 1% 9 3% 14 4% 8 3% 11 4% 5 2%(no #7. for 2004 admin, was #8. with "yes/no" response -- see below) Distance education 1 1% 1 0% 0 0% 3 2% 7 4% 4 1% 6 2% 9 3% 8 3% 9 4%

Total 123 100% 266 100% 188 100% 155 100% 158 100% 314 100% 320 100% 269 100% 284 100% 228 100%6. GENEDREQ No 57 47% 87 33% 69 37% 61 40% 69 43% 228 73% 215 67% 184 69% 191 67% 159 71%

Yes 65 53% 177 67% 120 63% 93 60% 90 57% 86 27% 105 33% 83 31% 92 33% 66 29%Total 122 100% 264 100% 189 100% 154 100% 159 100% 0 0% 314 100% 320 100% 267 100% 283 100% 225 100%

7. CS05 9 or less 0 0% 2 2% 3 1% 2 1% 3 2% 1 1% 10 4% 13 4% 15 5% 20 8% 8 3% 9 4%10 to 19 6 6% 12 10% 30 11% 24 13% 10 6% 16 10% 38 17% 53 17% 60 19% 51 19% 58 21% 35 16%20 to 29 16 17% 20 16% 76 29% 43 23% 44 29% 46 30% 67 29% 90 29% 101 32% 82 31% 87 31% 92 41%

** 2004 data combined for "50 to 74" and "75 to 99" ** 30 to 49 24 25% 31 25% 68 26% 53 28% 37 24% 40 26% 74 32% 92 30% 103 32% 72 27% 76 27% 45 20%** 2004 data combined for "100 to 149," "150 to 199," and "200 or more" ** 50 to 99 23 24% 29 24% 39 15% 32 17% 29 19% 30 19% 34 14% 49 16% 37 12% 33 12% 44 16% 29 13%(was #9. "CRSSIZE" for 2004 admin) 100 or more 27 28% 28 23% 47 18% 34 18% 31 20% 21 14% 7 3% 14 5% 2 1% 7 3% 8 3% 14 6%

Total 96 100% 122 100% 263 100% 188 100% 154 100% 154 100% 230 100% 311 100% 318 100% 265 100% 281 100% 224 100%8. CT05 0 8 7% 31 12% 23 13% 6 4% 7 5% 17 6% 31 10% 20 8% 14 5% 21 9%

1 to 2 18 15% 66 26% 36 20% 17 11% 36 24% 49 16% 61 20% 50 19% 30 11% 34 15%

Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campus? (was not part of 2004 admin)

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section?

Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

Working with undergraduates on research

Advising undergraduate students

Supervising internships or other field experiences

Working with students on activities other than course work (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

Other interactions with students outside of the classroom

Conducting service activities

Page 102: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 102 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

3 to 9 46 38% 91 35% 60 33% 67 45% 52 35% 131 43% 124 41% 78 30% 96 36% 64 29%** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 10 to 19 20 17% 42 16% 36 20% 31 21% 32 21% 52 17% 50 16% 55 21% 59 22% 49 22%(was #10. "CRSTIMES" for 2004 admin) 20 or more 29 24% 28 11% 26 14% 27 18% 23 15% 58 19% 39 13% 56 22% 69 26% 55 25%

Total 121 100% 258 100% 181 100% 148 100% 150 100% 307 100% 305 100% 259 100% 268 100% 223 100%9. CSDISCOL Arts and Humanities 20 21% 34 29% 66 28% 58 33% 38 27% 39 17% 63 21% 67 23% 48 20% 58 22%

Biological science 10 11% 9 8% 17 7% 7 4% 10 7% 6 3% 9 3% 13 4% 9 4% 9 3%Business 4 4% 8 7% 8 3% 8 5% 14 10% 27 12% 36 12% 24 8% 25 10% 30 12%Education 1 1% 2 2% 8 3% 2 1% 6 4% 23 10% 29 9% 34 12% 36 15% 28 11%Engineering 3 3% 7 6% 14 6% 12 7% 7 5% 22 10% 24 8% 21 7% 16 7% 23 9%Physical science 21 22% 25 22% 46 19% 32 18% 24 17% 17 8% 29 9% 26 9% 13 5% 21 8%Professional 9 9% 8 7% 8 3% 11 6% 8 6% 21 9% 21 7% 28 9% 18 7% 22 9%Social science 16 17% 11 9% 37 16% 27 16% 22 15% 32 14% 48 16% 37 13% 46 19% 36 14%

(was #11. for 2004 admin; not used for 2011) Other 11 12% 12 10% 33 14% 17 10% 14 10% 39 17% 48 16% 45 15% 30 12% 31 12%Total 95 100% 116 100% 237 100% 174 100% 143 100% 226 100% 307 100% 295 100% 241 99% 258 100%

10a. FCLQUEST None 2 2% 2 2% 4 2% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 3 1% 1 0% 3 1% 1 0% 1 0%1-24% 65 68% 67 54% 133 51% 97 52% 74 49% 83 53% 96 42% 121 39% 113 36% 93 35% 103 37% 91 40%25-49% 21 22% 29 24% 70 27% 41 22% 42 28% 35 22% 63 28% 91 29% 88 28% 87 33% 76 27% 52 23%50-74% 7 7% 17 14% 40 15% 36 19% 27 18% 23 15% 40 17% 54 17% 60 19% 38 14% 54 19% 45 20%

(was #12a. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 1 1% 8 7% 15 6% 14 7% 8 5% 14 9% 29 13% 44 14% 56 18% 45 17% 46 16% 37 16%Total 96 100% 123 100% 262 100% 188 100% 151 100% 157 100% 229 100% 313 100% 318 100% 266 100% 280 100% 226 100%

10b. FCLUNPRE None 1 1% 0 0% 8 3% 10 5% 3 2% 3 2% 8 4% 13 4% 14 4% 18 7% 16 6% 13 6%1-24% 30 32% 45 38% 110 43% 75 41% 57 37% 54 34% 115 50% 149 48% 151 48% 130 49% 123 44% 111 49%25-49% 27 29% 39 33% 66 26% 43 23% 45 29% 50 32% 60 26% 73 23% 78 25% 65 25% 78 28% 51 23%50-74% 29 31% 19 16% 58 22% 36 19% 35 23% 36 23% 36 16% 48 15% 53 17% 32 12% 51 18% 36 16%

(was #12b. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 6 6% 17 14% 16 6% 21 11% 13 8% 15 9% 9 4% 30 10% 20 6% 20 8% 13 5% 15 7%Total 93 100% 120 100% 258 100% 185 100% 153 100% 158 100% 228 100% 313 100% 316 100% 265 101% 281 100% 226 100%

10c. FWORKHRD None 4 4% 7 6% 16 6% 6 3% 6 4% 2 1% 6 3% 5 2% 9 3% 8 3% 4 1% 3 1%1-24% 38 41% 53 44% 122 47% 89 48% 58 38% 67 43% 56 25% 96 31% 105 34% 84 32% 89 32% 71 32%25-49% 22 24% 30 25% 70 27% 47 25% 51 33% 46 29% 85 38% 87 28% 94 30% 77 29% 84 31% 58 26%50-74% 22 24% 23 19% 43 17% 35 19% 32 21% 31 20% 58 26% 88 29% 77 25% 62 24% 59 21% 61 28%

(was #12c. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 6 7% 7 6% 7 3% 8 4% 6 4% 10 6% 20 9% 30 10% 27 9% 32 12% 39 14% 28 13%Total 92 100% 120 100% 258 100% 185 100% 153 100% 156 100% 225 100% 306 100% 312 100% 263 100% 275 100% 221 100%

10d. FEMAIL None 2 2% 1 1% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1-24% 45 48% 51 42% 107 41% 82 44% 57 38% 56 36% 90 40% 104 33% 88 28% 72 27% 84 30% 60 27%25-49% 28 30% 31 25% 67 26% 49 26% 44 29% 52 33% 53 23% 88 28% 77 24% 64 24% 74 26% 68 30%50-74% 14 15% 24 20% 44 17% 28 15% 26 17% 26 17% 45 20% 60 19% 71 22% 52 20% 45 16% 47 21%

(was #12d. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 5 5% 15 12% 42 16% 29 15% 25 16% 22 14% 39 17% 59 19% 81 25% 78 29% 77 28% 51 23%Total 94 100% 122 100% 262 100% 188 100% 152 100% 156 100% 227 100% 312 100% 319 100% 266 100% 280 100% 226 100%

10e. FGRADE None 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% 3 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 4 1% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0%1-24% 59 62% 60 49% 133 51% 96 51% 78 52% 79 50% 91 40% 126 41% 131 41% 106 40% 107 38% 88 39%25-49% 27 28% 34 28% 69 26% 55 29% 49 32% 44 28% 70 30% 105 34% 71 22% 75 28% 82 29% 70 31%50-74% 6 6% 16 13% 36 14% 19 10% 10 7% 19 12% 48 21% 51 16% 64 20% 44 16% 50 18% 43 19%

(was #12e. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 3 3% 11 9% 22 8% 14 7% 14 9% 15 10% 21 9% 28 9% 49 15% 41 15% 42 15% 23 10%Total 95 100% 123 100% 262 100% 187 100% 151 100% 157 100% 230 100% 311 100% 319 100% 267 99% 281 100% 225 100%

10f. FPLANS None 11 12% 9 7% 38 15% 22 12% 18 12% 18 11% 10 4% 13 4% 23 7% 18 7% 7 3% 20 9%1-24% 70 74% 83 67% 154 59% 111 59% 99 65% 100 64% 119 52% 157 50% 140 44% 136 51% 150 54% 101 45%25-49% 7 7% 19 15% 29 11% 25 13% 18 12% 19 12% 50 22% 62 20% 60 19% 37 14% 53 19% 48 21%50-74% 4 4% 6 5% 18 7% 17 9% 8 5% 13 8% 21 9% 36 12% 48 15% 35 13% 31 11% 25 11%

(was #12f. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 2 2% 6 5% 21 8% 13 7% 10 7% 7 4% 28 12% 44 14% 47 15% 41 15% 39 14% 31 14%Total 94 100% 123 100% 260 100% 188 100% 153 100% 157 100% 228 100% 312 100% 318 100% 267 100% 280 100% 225 100%

10g. FIDEAS None 12 13% 11 9% 40 15% 26 14% 10 7% 16 10% 14 6% 24 8% 30 9% 23 9% 17 6% 20 9%1-24% 69 73% 81 66% 165 63% 120 64% 111 73% 112 71% 132 57% 177 57% 177 56% 148 55% 167 59% 129 57%25-49% 12 13% 22 18% 38 15% 30 16% 19 13% 18 11% 49 21% 64 20% 65 20% 41 15% 53 19% 45 20%50-74% 2 2% 6 5% 12 5% 7 4% 8 5% 7 4% 21 9% 29 9% 26 8% 27 10% 20 7% 17 8%

(was #12g. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 0 0% 2 2% 7 3% 5 3% 4 3% 5 3% 14 6% 19 6% 20 6% 28 10% 24 9% 14 6%Total 95 100% 122 100% 262 100% 188 100% 152 100% 158 100% 230 100% 313 100% 318 100% 267 99% 281 100% 225 100%

11a. FDIVCLAS Never 40 42% 52 43% 88 34% 63 34% 62 41% 47 31% 57 25% 71 23% 82 26% 59 23% 67 25% 48 22%Sometimes 21 22% 36 30% 68 26% 62 34% 36 24% 41 27% 69 30% 108 35% 95 30% 72 27% 76 28% 74 33%Often 19 20% 17 14% 55 21% 30 16% 30 20% 30 20% 50 22% 59 19% 62 20% 56 21% 60 22% 51 23%

(was #13a. for 2004 admin) Very often 15 16% 15 13% 47 18% 30 16% 24 16% 34 22% 5 23% 74 24% 75 24% 75 29% 70 26% 50 22%Total 95 100% 120 100% 258 100% 185 100% 152 100% 152 100% 229 100% 312 100% 314 100% 262 100% 273 100% 223 100%

11b. FCLASSGR Never 25 26% 25 20% 47 18% 33 18% 22 15% 29 19% 39 17% 51 16% 44 14% 47 18% 35 13% 37 17%Sometimes 33 35% 40 33% 77 30% 55 30% 53 35% 46 30% 56 24% 79 25% 79 25% 69 26% 86 31% 61 27%Often 15 16% 28 23% 73 28% 62 33% 38 25% 38 25% 59 26% 78 25% 80 25% 59 23% 63 23% 54 24%

(was #13b. for 2004 admin) Very often 22 23% 29 24% 61 24% 36 19% 38 25% 42 27% 76 33% 105 34% 111 35% 86 33% 90 33% 71 32%Total 95 100% 122 100% 258 100% 186 100% 151 100% 155 100% 230 100% 313 100% 314 100% 261 100% 274 100% 223 100%

11c. FCOMMPRO Never 70 74% 97 80% 186 72% 140 77% 123 81% 115 75% 136 59% 216 69% 193 62% 172 66% 176 64% 145 66%Sometimes 14 15% 19 16% 43 17% 29 16% 19 13% 29 19% 46 20% 50 16% 69 22% 50 19% 56 20% 45 20%Often 5 5% 3 2% 19 7% 6 3% 4 3% 8 5% 20 9% 22 7% 22 7% 20 8% 20 7% 15 7%

(was #13c. for 2004 admin) Very often 5 5% 2 2% 9 4% 8 4% 6 4% 2 1% 27 12% 25 8% 27 9% 19 7% 22 8% 15 7%Total 94 100% 121 100% 257 100% 183 100% 152 100% 154 100% 229 100% 313 100% 311 100% 261 100% 274 100% 220 100%

11d. FITICADE Never 27 29% 33 27% 81 31% 64 35% 45 30% 39 25% 50 22% 81 26% 74 24% 62 24% 62 23% 53 24%Sometimes 29 31% 47 39% 81 31% 50 27% 50 33% 50 32% 77 34% 104 33% 84 27% 63 24% 92 33% 63 29%Often 16 17% 19 16% 42 16% 30 16% 26 17% 23 15% 53 23% 54 17% 72 23% 56 21% 50 18% 48 22%

(was #13d. for 2004 admin) Very often 22 23% 22 18% 54 21% 39 21% 31 20% 42 27% 49 21% 75 24% 84 27% 82 31% 71 26% 57 26%Total 94 100% 121 100% 258 100% 183 100% 152 100% 154 100% 229 100% 314 100% 314 100% 263 100% 275 100% 221 100%

Have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.)

Work with other students on projects during class

Participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of your course

Use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment

Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments

Frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards

Occasionally use e-mail to communicate with you

Occasionally discuss grades or assignments with you

At least once, talk about career plans

At least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside of class

What is the general area of your selected course?

Frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

Page 103: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 103 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

11e. FFEED Never 0 0% 4 3% 7 3% 3 2% 1 1% 3 2% 1 0% 0 0% 3 1% 4 2% 1 0% 2 1%Sometimes 12 13% 15 12% 37 14% 27 15% 12 8% 22 14% 18 8% 39 12% 29 9% 25 9% 24 9% 23 10%Often 29 31% 42 34% 90 35% 58 31% 62 41% 57 37% 78 34% 104 33% 114 37% 89 34% 81 29% 71 32%

(was #13e. for 2004 admin) Very often 54 57% 61 50% 124 48% 97 52% 76 50% 73 47% 132 58% 171 54% 165 53% 147 55% 169 61% 128 57%Total 95 100% 122 100% 258 100% 185 100% 151 100% 155 100% 229 100% 314 100% 311 100% 265 100% 275 100% 224 100%

11f. FDIVRSTU Never 26 28% 32 27% 75 29% 59 32% 41 27% 34 22% 55 24% 70 23% 78 25% 61 23% 57 21% 44 20%Sometimes 46 49% 72 60% 117 46% 76 41% 76 50% 72 47% 120 52% 165 53% 146 47% 125 48% 149 55% 110 50%Often 14 15% 11 9% 39 15% 35 19% 24 16% 27 18% 30 13% 50 16% 62 20% 44 17% 38 14% 44 20%

(was #13f. for 2004 admin) Very often 7 8% 5 4% 26 10% 15 8% 11 7% 20 13% 24 10% 24 8% 27 9% 30 12% 29 11% 24 11%Total 93 100% 120 100% 257 100% 185 100% 152 100% 153 100% 229 100% 309 100% 313 100% 260 100% 273 100% 222 100%

11g. FDIFFSTU Never 28 30% 30 26% 75 29% 62 34% 42 28% 40 26% 54 24% 63 21% 73 23% 58 22% 56 21% 49 22%Sometimes 43 46% 70 60% 121 47% 84 45% 72 48% 64 42% 105 46% 164 53% 146 47% 120 46% 140 51% 107 48%Often 14 15% 10 9% 36 14% 20 11% 26 17% 35 23% 35 15% 43 14% 52 17% 48 18% 42 15% 40 18%

(was #13g. for 2004 admin) Very often 8 9% 6 5% 25 10% 19 10% 10 7% 14 9% 33 15% 37 12% 40 13% 36 14% 34 13% 27 12%Total 93 100% 116 100% 257 100% 185 100% 150 100% 153 100% 227 100% 307 100% 311 100% 262 100% 272 100% 223 100%

12a. FREADASG None 2 2% 4 3% 16 6% 6 3% 6 4% 10 7% 8 3% 7 2% 11 4% 14 5% 15 6% 13 6%1 44 46% 73 61% 146 57% 108 60% 86 60% 95 63% 85 37% 133 43% 149 48% 118 46% 121 48% 106 51%2-3 41 43% 36 30% 80 31% 58 32% 40 28% 34 22% 102 45% 131 42% 117 38% 104 40% 97 38% 70 34%4-6 7 7% 5 4% 14 5% 4 2% 10 7% 8 5% 22 10% 33 11% 22 7% 16 6% 11 4% 15 7%

(was #14a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 1 1% 2 2% 1 0% 5 3% 2 1% 5 3% 12 5% 7 2% 12 4% 7 3% 8 3% 4 2%Total 95 100% 120 100% 257 100% 181 100% 144 100% 152 100% 229 100% 311 100% 311 100% 259 100% 252 100% 208 100%

12b. FWRTMR05 None 104 89% 217 86% 164 90% 140 93% 134 88% 210 68% 232 76% 194 75% 207 77% 163 75%1 9 8% 22 9% 13 7% 4 3% 12 8% 60 20% 52 17% 44 17% 47 17% 33 15%2-3 3 3% 9 4% 4 2% 4 3% 4 3% 30 10% 17 6% 19 7% 11 4% 12 6%

** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 1 1% 2 1% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 5 2% 3 1% 0 0% 2 1% 6 3%(was #14b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 0 0% 1 0% 1 1% 1 1% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 3 1% 2 1%

Total 117 100% 251 100% 183 100% 150 100% 152 100% 307 100% 306 100% 259 100% 270 100% 216 100%12c. FWRTMD05 None 70 60% 153 62% 103 57% 89 61% 90 59% 105 34% 124 41% 94 37% 98 38% 79 36%

1 22 19% 43 17% 36 20% 34 23% 28 18% 88 29% 83 28% 70 28% 77 30% 53 24%2-3 16 14% 34 14% 31 17% 18 12% 27 18% 78 25% 65 22% 63 25% 52 20% 58 26%

** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 6 5% 11 4% 6 3% 4 3% 5 3% 26 8% 15 5% 17 7% 23 9% 22 10%(was #14c. for 2004 admin) More than 6 2 2% 6 2% 5 3% 1 1% 3 2% 9 3% 13 4% 9 4% 9 3% 7 3%

Total 116 100% 247 100% 181 100% 146 100% 153 100% 306 100% 300 100% 253 101% 259 100% 219 100%12d. FWRITSML None 37 39% 38 32% 58 23% 45 25% 38 26% 38 25% 50 23% 74 24% 38 12% 41 16% 43 16% 44 20%

1 10 11% 9 8% 34 13% 25 14% 17 11% 23 15% 23 11% 25 8% 42 14% 31 12% 30 11% 19 9%2-3 13 14% 25 21% 56 22% 38 21% 35 23% 30 19% 56 26% 83 27% 72 23% 69 27% 82 30% 56 26%4-6 16 17% 19 16% 39 15% 33 18% 21 14% 17 11% 36 17% 59 19% 74 24% 46 18% 48 18% 38 17%

(was #14d. for 2004 admin) More than 6 19 20% 27 23% 67 26% 41 23% 38 26% 46 30% 51 24% 64 21% 81 26% 71 28% 70 26% 62 28%Total 95 100% 118 100% 254 100% 182 100% 149 100% 154 100% 216 100% 305 100% 307 100% 258 101% 273 100% 219 100%

13a. FPROBSTA None 35 38% 29 26% 92 37% 80 43% 61 40% 57 38% 78 35% 107 36% 128 41% 96 37% 105 39% 81 37%1 42 46% 63 56% 96 38% 62 34% 49 32% 58 38% 102 46% 137 46% 105 34% 97 38% 89 33% 91 42%2-3 7 8% 16 14% 31 12% 21 11% 17 11% 13 9% 26 12% 37 12% 39 13% 31 12% 29 11% 18 8%4-6 3 3% 2 2% 11 4% 7 4% 4 3% 10 7% 6 3% 11 4% 10 3% 12 5% 16 6% 9 4%

(was #15a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 4 4% 3 3% 22 9% 14 8% 20 13% 14 9% 9 4% 8 3% 27 9% 21 8% 28 10% 19 9%Total 91 100% 113 100% 252 100% 184 100% 151 100% 152 100% 221 100% 300 100% 309 100% 257 100% 267 100% 218 100%

13b. FPROBSTB None 51 57% 49 45% 96 39% 65 36% 57 39% 61 40% 107 50% 150 51% 153 50% 116 45% 132 50% 102 47%1 29 32% 49 45% 81 33% 63 35% 54 36% 42 28% 73 34% 99 34% 90 30% 96 38% 68 26% 68 31%2-3 7 8% 7 6% 29 12% 20 11% 13 9% 22 14% 21 10% 27 9% 24 8% 16 6% 37 14% 26 12%4-6 1 1% 2 2% 11 4% 12 7% 6 4% 8 5% 6 3% 9 3% 12 4% 8 3% 8 3% 8 4%

(was #15b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 2 2% 2 2% 32 13% 22 12% 18 12% 19 13% 9 4% 7 2% 25 8% 20 8% 19 7% 12 6%Total 90 100% 109 100% 249 100% 182 100% 148 100% 152 100% 216 100% 292 100% 304 100% 256 100% 264 100% 216 100%

14a. FEXPREP 0 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0%1-2 4 4% 9 8% 43 17% 25 14% 11 7% 11 7% 6 3% 11 4% 26 8% 24 9% 13 5% 13 6%3-4 23 24% 33 28% 100 39% 58 31% 60 40% 48 31% 76 33% 84 27% 111 35% 83 32% 86 31% 82 37%5-6 33 36% 34 29% 64 25% 53 29% 45 30% 45 29% 75 33% 113 37% 95 30% 76 29% 70 25% 64 29%7-8 21 22% 19 16% 21 8% 31 17% 17 11% 23 15% 38 17% 51 17% 35 11% 39 15% 51 19% 29 13%9-10 10 11% 17 14% 19 7% 10 5% 12 8% 18 12% 26 11% 35 11% 32 10% 21 8% 29 11% 20 9%11-12 2 2% 5 4% 5 2% 6 3% 4 3% 7 5% 2 1% 8 3% 5 2% 11 4% 15 5% 9 4%

(was #16a. for 2004 admin) More than 12 1 1% 2 2% 4 2% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 7 3% 6 2% 12 4% 8 3% 11 4% 5 2%Total 94 100% 119 100% 257 100% 185 100% 151 100% 154 100% 230 100% 309 100% 316 100% 263 100% 275 100% 222 100%

14b. FACTPREP 0 3 3% 5 4% 22 9% 9 5% 5 3% 3 2% 5 2% 4 1% 10 3% 3 1% 5 2% 2 1%1-2 49 53% 55 47% 155 61% 104 57% 92 61% 90 58% 99 43% 118 38% 158 50% 125 48% 111 40% 110 50%3-4 29 31% 46 39% 56 22% 46 25% 39 26% 41 27% 70 30% 118 38% 96 30% 78 30% 87 32% 69 31%5-6 8 9% 8 7% 13 5% 16 9% 10 7% 15 10% 32 14% 46 15% 28 9% 34 13% 38 14% 18 8%7-8 1 1% 3 3% 7 3% 7 4% 2 1% 3 2% 15 7% 13 4% 16 5% 14 5% 20 7% 14 6%9-10 2 2% 0 0% 1 0% 1 1% 0 0% 2 1% 7 3% 4 1% 4 1% 5 2% 7 3% 4 2%11-12 0 0% 1 1% 2 1% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 2% 3 1% 2 1%

(was #16b. for 2004 admin) More than 12 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 4 1% 3 1% 0 0% 4 1% 1 0%Total 93 100% 118 100% 256 100% 184 100% 150 100% 154 100% 230 100% 307 100% 315 100% 263 101% 275 100% 220 100%

15a. FREWROPA Not important 36 39% 52 47% 91 36% 75 42% 58 39% 51 35% 61 27% 82 27% 66 21% 64 24% 63 23% 49 22%Somewhat important 22 24% 18 16% 50 20% 40 22% 36 24% 38 26% 53 23% 71 23% 86 28% 62 24% 64 24% 54 24%Important 18 20% 25 23% 55 22% 34 19% 29 19% 26 18% 57 25% 76 25% 85 27% 68 26% 76 28% 65 29%

(was #17a. for 2004 admin) Very important 16 17% 16 14% 54 22% 30 17% 27 18% 29 20% 57 25% 77 25% 73 24% 69 26% 69 25% 54 24%Total 92 100% 111 100% 250 100% 179 100% 150 100% 144 100% 228 100% 306 100% 310 100% 263 100% 272 100% 222 100%

15b. FINTEGRA Not important 20 22% 26 24% 72 28% 44 25% 35 24% 32 21% 20 9% 32 10% 25 8% 22 8% 26 10% 19 9%Somewhat important 14 15% 23 21% 29 11% 27 15% 21 14% 18 12% 23 10% 35 11% 36 12% 33 13% 31 11% 22 10%

Work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

Number of problem sets that take your students less than one hour to complete

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you expect your students to spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you think your students actually spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

Have serious conversations in your course with students who are very different from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings

Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

Number of problem sets that take your students more than one hour to complete

Receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic performance

Have serious conversations in your course with students of a different race or ethnicity than their own

Page 104: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 104 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

Important 22 24% 21 19% 55 22% 45 25% 39 26% 45 30% 67 30% 72 23% 86 28% 58 22% 62 23% 55 25%(was #17b. for 2004 admin) Very important 35 38% 40 36% 97 38% 62 35% 53 36% 54 36% 117 52% 168 55% 164 53% 150 57% 153 56% 126 57%

Total 91 100% 110 100% 253 100% 178 100% 148 100% 149 100% 227 100% 307 100% 311 100% 263 100% 272 100% 222 100%15c. FOCCGRP Not important 23 25% 24 21% 83 33% 61 34% 49 33% 44 30% 39 17% 60 20% 56 18% 59 23% 52 19% 55 25%

Somewhat important 23 25% 40 35% 61 24% 43 24% 43 29% 42 28% 66 29% 88 29% 84 27% 71 27% 69 26% 63 29%Important 27 29% 32 28% 70 28% 44 24% 36 24% 38 26% 66 29% 93 30% 87 28% 62 24% 89 33% 48 22%

(was #17c. for 2004 admin) Very important 19 21% 18 16% 39 15% 32 18% 19 13% 25 17% 58 25% 66 21% 83 27% 70 27% 60 22% 54 25%Total 92 100% 114 100% 253 100% 180 100% 147 100% 149 100% 229 100% 307 100% 310 100% 262 101% 270 100% 220 100%

15d. FINTIDEA Not important 21 23% 29 26% 54 22% 38 21% 33 22% 34 23% 16 7% 23 7% 28 9% 27 10% 28 10% 21 9%Somewhat important 32 35% 32 29% 92 37% 59 33% 53 35% 46 31% 56 25% 78 25% 83 27% 65 25% 76 28% 57 26%Important 21 23% 34 30% 74 29% 48 27% 44 29% 50 34% 80 35% 112 36% 109 35% 83 32% 90 33% 85 38%

(was #17d. for 2004 admin) Very important 17 19% 17 15% 31 12% 35 19% 20 13% 18 12% 76 33% 95 31% 89 29% 88 33% 78 29% 59 27%Total 91 100% 112 100% 251 100% 180 100% 150 100% 148 100% 228 100% 308 100% 309 100% 263 100% 272 100% 222 100%

15e. FOOCID05 Not important 18 20% 27 24% 54 21% 32 18% 35 24% 21 14% 24 11% 43 14% 42 14% 32 12% 38 14% 31 14%Somewhat important 26 28% 41 37% 81 32% 56 32% 48 32% 60 40% 81 36% 91 30% 99 32% 89 34% 90 33% 72 33%

NOTE: slight change in question wording from 2004 admin Important 32 36% 26 23% 87 35% 56 32% 49 33% 42 28% 85 37% 110 36% 101 33% 86 33% 85 31% 71 32%(was #17e. for 2004 admin) Very important 16 17% 18 16% 30 12% 33 19% 16 11% 26 17% 38 17% 63 21% 67 22% 54 21% 59 22% 46 21%

Total 92 100% 112 100% 252 100% 177 100% 148 100% 149 100% 228 100% 307 100% 309 100% 261 100% 272 100% 220 100%15f. FTUTOR Not important 44 48% 56 50% 104 41% 86 48% 72 48% 72 48% 100 44% 140 46% 130 42% 121 46% 116 42% 100 45%

Somewhat important 24 26% 35 31% 85 34% 56 31% 43 29% 45 30% 70 31% 90 29% 94 30% 70 27% 89 33% 60 27%Important 17 19% 15 13% 46 18% 30 17% 27 18% 23 15% 38 17% 50 16% 51 17% 50 19% 52 19% 40 18%

(was #17f. for 2004 admin) Very important 6 7% 6 5% 16 6% 7 4% 7 5% 10 7% 19 8% 26 8% 34 11% 21 8% 16 6% 20 9%Total 91 100% 112 100% 251 100% 179 100% 149 100% 150 100% 227 100% 306 100% 309 100% 262 100% 273 100% 220 100%

15g. FOWNVIEW Not important 22 20% 44 18% 20 11% 27 18% 25 17% 32 11% 29 9% 24 9% 29 11% 20 9%Somewhat important 24 21% 46 18% 43 24% 33 22% 25 17% 61 20% 54 17% 44 17% 47 17% 36 16%Important 37 33% 83 33% 53 30% 42 28% 40 27% 105 35% 95 31% 77 29% 91 34% 73 33%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 29 26% 78 31% 63 35% 46 31% 57 39% 106 35% 132 43% 118 45% 102 38% 91 41%Total 112 100% 251 100% 179 100% 148 100% 147 100% 304 100% 310 100% 263 100% 269 100% 220 100%

15h. FOTHRVW Not important 27 24% 57 23% 35 20% 31 21% 28 19% 40 13% 34 11% 34 13% 30 11% 29 13%Somewhat important 22 20% 34 13% 39 22% 28 19% 29 19% 59 19% 44 14% 34 13% 44 16% 33 15%Important 33 29% 73 29% 37 21% 35 23% 32 21% 86 28% 97 31% 64 25% 85 31% 56 25%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 30 27% 88 35% 67 38% 55 37% 61 41% 121 40% 135 44% 129 49% 112 41% 102 46%Total 112 100% 252 100% 178 100% 149 100% 150 100% 306 100% 310 100% 261 100% 271 100% 220 100%

15i. FCHNGVW Not important 6 5% 11 4% 3 2% 2 1% 6 4% 6 2% 4 1% 3 1% 3 1% 4 2%Somewhat important 15 13% 33 13% 14 8% 13 9% 17 11% 21 7% 21 7% 15 6% 17 6% 12 5%Important 31 27% 79 31% 55 31% 47 32% 37 25% 95 31% 87 28% 68 26% 80 29% 46 21%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 63 55% 129 51% 107 60% 87 58% 89 60% 184 60% 198 64% 177 67% 172 63% 158 72%Total 115 100% 252 100% 179 100% 149 100% 149 100% 306 100% 310 100% 263 100% 272 100% 220 100%

16a. LECTURE 0% 2 3% 3 3% 5 2% 4 2% 6 4% 8 5% 12 6% 8 3% 15 5% 11 4% 4 1% 10 5%1-9% 8 11% 11 9% 28 12% 13 7% 12 8% 19 13% 19 10% 32 11% 45 15% 30 12% 27 10% 26 12%10-19% 5 7% 6 5% 40 17% 22 12% 13 9% 16 11% 22 12% 18 6% 42 14% 34 13% 40 15% 30 14%20-29% 3 4% 20 17% 35 15% 24 13% 13 9% 13 9% 23 12% 45 15% 36 12% 34 13% 34 13% 26 12%30-39% 4 5% 14 12% 17 7% 13 7% 16 11% 13 9% 15 8% 29 10% 33 11% 25 10% 27 10% 20 9%40-49% 14 19% 15 13% 38 16% 21 12% 26 17% 21 14% 25 13% 40 13% 34 11% 31 12% 36 13% 20 9%50-74% 15 20% 21 18% 48 20% 42 23% 37 25% 34 23% 40 21% 63 21% 76 25% 62 24% 64 24% 59 27%

(was #18a. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 24 32% 26 22% 30 12% 40 22% 27 18% 27 18% 31 17% 66 22% 25 8% 31 12% 40 15% 28 13%Total 75 100% 116 100% 241 100% 179 100% 150 100% 151 100% 187 100% 301 100% 306 100% 258 100% 272 100% 219 100%

16b. TEACHLED 0% 7 9% 7 6% 23 10% 14 8% 8 5% 10 7% 10 5% 13 4% 8 3% 11 4% 11 4% 14 6%1-9% 18 24% 22 19% 59 24% 38 21% 31 21% 31 21% 45 24% 55 18% 53 18% 47 18% 46 17% 42 19%10-19% 16 22% 25 22% 48 20% 44 25% 36 24% 45 30% 39 21% 75 25% 90 30% 72 28% 75 28% 46 21%20-29% 12 16% 30 26% 40 17% 42 24% 31 21% 32 22% 44 24% 56 19% 61 20% 53 21% 69 26% 46 21%30-39% 10 14% 8 7% 30 12% 14 8% 17 11% 9 6% 23 12% 42 14% 33 11% 24 9% 32 12% 26 12%40-49% 5 7% 7 6% 19 8% 6 3% 3 2% 7 5% 12 6% 23 8% 27 9% 18 7% 17 6% 18 8%50-74% 3 4% 7 6% 19 8% 12 7% 14 9% 7 5% 11 6% 21 7% 21 7% 22 9% 17 6% 18 8%

(was #18b. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 3 4% 8 7% 4 2% 8 4% 9 6% 7 5% 2 1% 14 5% 8 3% 10 4% 3 1% 10 5%Total 74 100% 114 100% 242 100% 178 100% 149 100% 148 100% 186 100% 299 100% 301 100% 257 100% 270 100% 220 100%

16c. TEACHSTU 0% 39 58% 44 38% 97 41% 71 40% 47 32% 53 36% 45 26% 73 25% 84 29% 60 23% 67 25% 55 25%1-9% 14 21% 20 17% 46 20% 36 20% 31 21% 25 17% 40 23% 73 25% 60 21% 69 27% 54 20% 47 22%10-19% 5 7% 21 18% 22 9% 30 17% 25 17% 29 20% 22 13% 58 20% 41 14% 47 18% 57 21% 32 15%20-29% 4 6% 10 9% 22 9% 20 11% 14 10% 13 9% 29 16% 41 14% 54 19% 32 12% 39 15% 26 12%30-39% 1 1% 7 6% 18 8% 4 2% 10 7% 6 4% 19 11% 18 6% 21 7% 18 7% 18 7% 25 12%40-49% 2 3% 4 3% 14 6% 3 2% 4 3% 3 2% 8 5% 13 4% 11 4% 12 5% 15 6% 12 6%50-74% 1 1% 5 4% 11 5% 8 5% 6 4% 10 7% 10 6% 9 3% 14 5% 10 4% 12 4% 11 5%

(was #18c. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1 1% 4 3% 4 2% 4 2% 8 6% 7 5% 3 2% 8 3% 6 2% 9 4% 6 2% 8 4%Total 67 100% 115 100% 234 100% 176 100% 145 100% 146 100% 176 100% 293 100% 291 100% 257 100% 268 100% 216 100%

16d. COMPMED 0% 48 65% 66 58% 131 54% 101 57% 84 56% 81 55% 96 54% 157 53% 180 61% 140 55% 139 51% 115 53%1-9% 11 15% 28 25% 51 21% 38 22% 31 21% 33 22% 40 23% 61 21% 51 17% 43 17% 49 18% 38 17%10-19% 6 8% 7 6% 15 6% 12 7% 12 8% 11 7% 20 11% 34 11% 26 9% 25 10% 36 13% 29 13%20-29% 4 5% 3 3% 12 5% 8 5% 3 2% 9 6% 10 6% 20 7% 7 2% 16 6% 13 5% 10 5%30-39% 1 1% 4 4% 4 2% 4 2% 1 1% 4 3% 6 3% 6 2% 10 3% 5 2% 10 4% 7 3%40-49% 2 3% 3 3% 6 2% 4 2% 6 4% 2 1% 2 1% 6 2% 2 1% 4 2% 2 1% 4 2%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 9 4% 3 2% 4 3% 5 3% 3 2% 6 2% 8 3% 9 4% 12 4% 6 3%

(was #18d. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 2 3% 3 3% 14 6% 6 3% 8 5% 3 2% 0 0% 6 2% 13 4% 12 5% 11 4% 9 4%Total 74 100% 114 100% 242 100% 176 100% 149 100% 148 100% 177 100% 296 100% 297 100% 254 101% 272 100% 218 100%

16e. GROUPSML 0% 30 41% 30 26% 71 29% 42 24% 30 20% 26 18% 42 23% 67 22% 68 22% 60 23% 49 18% 48 22%1-9% 13 18% 35 30% 59 24% 41 23% 38 26% 32 22% 37 20% 62 21% 60 19% 52 20% 63 23% 43 20%

Student computer use

Small group activities

Try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from that person's perspective

Learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or concept

Lecture

Teacher-led discussion

Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions

Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or issue

Page 105: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 105 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

10-19% 12 16% 23 20% 39 16% 40 22% 24 16% 33 22% 42 23% 63 21% 69 22% 57 22% 60 22% 47 22%20-29% 8 11% 13 11% 32 13% 31 17% 22 15% 19 13% 33 18% 46 15% 46 15% 42 16% 38 14% 25 11%30-39% 2 3% 8 7% 9 4% 6 3% 14 9% 9 6% 14 8% 26 9% 21 7% 13 5% 26 10% 19 9%40-49% 6 8% 1 1% 17 7% 8 4% 6 4% 13 9% 8 4% 13 4% 17 6% 13 5% 13 5% 14 6%50-74% 3 4% 3 3% 9 4% 7 4% 4 3% 12 8% 4 2% 15 5% 14 5% 10 4% 12 4% 15 7%

(was #18e. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0 0% 2 2% 10 4% 3 2% 10 7% 4 3% 1 1% 7 2% 13 4% 11 4% 11 4% 7 3%Total 74 100% 115 100% 246 100% 178 100% 148 100% 148 100% 181 100% 299 100% 308 100% 258 99% 272 100% 218 100%

16f. STUPRES 0% 58 61% 67 58% 136 55% 100 57% 76 52% 60 41% 69 30% 95 32% 103 34% 84 33% 98 36% 79 36%1-9% 22 23% 28 24% 62 25% 37 21% 31 21% 52 35% 62 27% 93 31% 80 26% 80 31% 75 28% 55 25%10-19% 7 7% 12 10% 21 9% 21 12% 24 16% 20 14% 44 19% 72 24% 72 24% 48 19% 44 16% 46 21%20-29% 3 3% 3 3% 16 6% 9 5% 5 3% 8 5% 29 13% 22 7% 29 10% 21 8% 31 11% 21 10%30-39% 2 2% 3 3% 5 2% 3 2% 4 3% 3 2% 12 5% 10 3% 8 3% 9 4% 15 6% 8 4%40-49% 1 1% 0 0% 4 2% 2 1% 3 2% 3 2% 5 2% 3 1% 2 1% 7 3% 1 0% 1 0%50-74% 2 2% 2 2% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 1 1% 6 3% 3 1% 2 1% 7 3% 3 1% 7 3%

(was #18f. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 2 1% 1 1% 0 0% 2 1% 7 2% 1 0% 4 1% 1 0%Total 95 100% 115 100% 247 100% 176 100% 147 100% 148 100% 227 100% 300 100% 303 100% 257 101% 271 100% 218 100%

16g. CLSWRITE 0% 57 61% 61 54% 126 52% 91 52% 77 52% 64 43% 104 46% 140 47% 156 51% 118 46% 122 45% 98 45%1-9% 23 24% 35 31% 67 28% 51 29% 40 27% 36 24% 80 36% 100 34% 95 31% 83 32% 83 31% 75 35%10-19% 11 12% 10 9% 25 10% 24 14% 14 9% 19 13% 26 12% 42 14% 27 9% 26 10% 38 14% 23 11%20-29% 2 2% 3 3% 11 5% 3 2% 11 7% 11 7% 8 4% 9 3% 16 5% 9 4% 15 6% 14 6%30-39% 1 1% 3 3% 5 2% 2 1% 1 1% 6 4% 4 2% 4 1% 3 1% 10 4% 2 1% 3 1%40-49% 0 0% 1 1% 7 3% 4 2% 3 2% 4 3% 0 0% 1 0% 4 1% 4 2% 4 1% 0 0%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 2 1% 6 4% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 3 1% 3 1% 4 2%

(was #18g. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 3 2% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 4 2% 2 1% 0 0%Total 94 100% 113 100% 243 100% 176 100% 148 100% 149 100% 224 100% 298 100% 304 100% 257 101% 269 100% 217 100%

16h. TESTEVAL 0% 3 3% 8 7% 31 12% 18 10% 7 5% 16 11% 19 8% 24 8% 45 15% 36 14% 31 11% 36 17%1-9% 39 41% 52 46% 113 45% 88 50% 64 43% 56 38% 104 46% 135 45% 136 45% 120 47% 95 35% 82 38%10-19% 39 41% 44 39% 67 27% 45 26% 57 39% 40 27% 79 35% 102 34% 96 31% 58 23% 105 39% 66 30%20-29% 10 11% 7 6% 20 8% 11 6% 11 7% 16 11% 12 5% 25 8% 12 4% 25 10% 20 7% 18 8%30-39% 4 4% 2 2% 8 3% 4 2% 2 1% 11 7% 4 2% 6 2% 9 3% 6 2% 6 2% 8 4%40-49% 0 0% 1 1% 5 2% 2 1% 3 2% 3 2% 4 2% 1 0% 2 1% 5 2% 4 1% 1 0%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 3 1% 3 2% 3 2% 4 3% 2 1% 2 1% 2 1% 4 2% 5 2% 4 2%

(was #18h. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 5 3% 1 1% 3 2% 0 0% 4 1% 3 1% 2 1% 4 1% 2 1%Total 95 100% 114 100% 249 100% 176 100% 148 100% 149 100% 224 100% 299 100% 305 100% 256 101% 270 100% 217 100%

16i. PERFORM 0% 87 96% 99 88% 220 90% 159 93% 132 89% 126 86% 209 94% 265 92% 277 91% 223 91% 236 90% 197 93%1-9% 1 1% 4 4% 10 4% 4 2% 5 3% 8 5% 4 2% 8 3% 10 3% 8 3% 11 4% 7 3%10-19% 0 0% 1 1% 5 2% 1 1% 3 2% 2 1% 4 2% 3 1% 7 2% 4 2% 4 2% 3 1%20-29% 1 1% 4 4% 0 0% 4 2% 3 2% 3 2% 1 0% 4 1% 5 2% 1 0% 7 3% 2 1%30-39% 1 1% 2 2% 1 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40-49% 0 0% 0 0% 5 2% 1 1% 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 1 0% 1 0% 2 1% 3 1% 1 0% 2 1%

(was #18i. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1 1% 3 3% 4 2% 1 1% 3 2% 4 3% 3 1% 5 2% 3 1% 3 1% 2 1% 1 0%Total 91 100% 113 100% 245 100% 171 100% 148 100% 146 100% 223 100% 289 100% 305 100% 244 99% 262 100% 212 100%

16j. EXPERIEN 0% 61 66% 61 54% 149 60% 105 60% 80 54% 90 62% 117 52% 160 55% 175 58% 146 59% 142 54% 118 56%1-9% 8 9% 15 13% 23 9% 18 10% 21 14% 17 12% 24 11% 37 13% 31 10% 31 12% 33 12% 26 12%10-19% 6 7% 8 7% 14 6% 15 9% 15 10% 8 5% 23 10% 23 8% 18 6% 28 11% 23 9% 15 7%20-29% 6 7% 13 12% 15 6% 13 7% 6 4% 7 5% 15 7% 21 7% 14 5% 16 6% 23 9% 11 5%30-39% 4 4% 5 4% 6 2% 5 3% 4 3% 4 3% 14 6% 14 5% 20 7% 3 1% 8 3% 7 3%40-49% 2 2% 4 4% 9 4% 5 3% 6 4% 7 5% 9 4% 17 6% 11 4% 3 1% 7 3% 8 4%50-74% 4 4% 4 4% 14 6% 3 2% 6 4% 5 3% 13 6% 13 4% 13 4% 11 4% 14 5% 12 6%

(was #18j. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1 1% 2 2% 17 7% 11 6% 10 7% 8 5% 10 4% 8 3% 22 7% 11 4% 15 6% 14 7%Total 92 100% 112 100% 247 100% 175 100% 148 100% 146 100% 225 100% 293 100% 304 100% 249 98% 265 100% 211 100%

17. FEXAMS 1 Very little 1 1% 0 0% 2 1% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 1 0% 0 0% 3 1% 0 0% 1 0% 2 1%2 0 0% 1 1% 3 1% 4 2% 0 0% 2 1% 1 0% 1 0% 4 1% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0%3 4 4% 4 3% 8 3% 7 4% 8 5% 4 3% 7 3% 1 0% 6 2% 3 1% 4 1% 3 1%4 6 6% 23 20% 46 19% 18 10% 17 11% 17 12% 10 4% 22 7% 23 7% 28 11% 25 9% 20 9%5 27 29% 24 21% 76 31% 61 35% 46 31% 50 34% 60 27% 77 25% 81 26% 59 23% 62 23% 49 22%6 37 39% 46 40% 75 30% 60 34% 49 33% 48 33% 92 41% 135 44% 111 35% 101 39% 103 38% 88 40%

(was #19. for 2004 admin) 7 Very much 19 20% 18 16% 38 15% 26 15% 29 19% 24 16% 55 24% 72 23% 86 27% 65 25% 74 27% 55 25%Total 94 100% 116 100% 248 100% 176 100% 150 100% 146 100% 226 100% 308 100% 314 100% 257 99% 271 100% 218 100%

18a. FMEMORIZ Very little 25 27% 39 34% 67 27% 57 33% 29 20% 45 31% 96 42% 93 31% 116 38% 2 1% 102 38% 87 40%Some 33 35% 47 41% 95 38% 62 36% 60 41% 45 31% 80 35% 136 45% 104 34% 25 10% 97 36% 83 38%Quite a bit 28 30% 25 22% 62 25% 38 22% 41 28% 31 22% 37 16% 58 19% 63 21% 109 42% 51 19% 36 17%

(was #20a. for 2004 admin) Very much 8 9% 5 4% 23 9% 17 10% 18 12% 23 16% 16 7% 17 6% 22 7% 122 47% 17 6% 10 5%Total 94 100% 116 100% 247 100% 174 100% 148 100% 144 100% 229 100% 304 100% 305 100% 258 100% 267 100% 216 100%

18b. FANALYZE Very little 0 0% 4 3% 5 2% 9 5% 3 2% 4 3% 1 0% 3 1% 3 1% 5 2% 2 1% 1 0%Some 12 13% 14 12% 29 12% 18 10% 18 12% 18 12% 20 9% 26 9% 29 9% 31 12% 22 8% 26 12%Quite a bit 44 47% 57 49% 109 44% 66 38% 66 45% 63 43% 88 39% 115 38% 134 44% 94 36% 108 40% 80 36%

(was #20b. for 2004 admin) Very much 38 40% 41 35% 103 42% 82 47% 61 41% 60 41% 117 52% 160 53% 140 46% 128 50% 137 51% 113 51%Total 94 100% 116 100% 246 100% 175 100% 148 100% 145 100% 226 100% 304 100% 306 100% 258 100% 269 100% 220 100%

18c. FSYNTHES Very little 3 3% 3 3% 8 3% 8 5% 7 5% 9 6% 4 2% 5 2% 5 2% 5 2% 5 2% 1 0%Some 14 15% 23 20% 54 22% 31 18% 24 16% 23 16% 20 9% 27 9% 30 10% 31 12% 30 11% 16 7%Quite a bit 40 43% 48 41% 97 39% 70 40% 51 34% 60 42% 88 39% 125 41% 122 40% 94 36% 82 31% 87 40%

(was #20c. for 2004 admin) Very much 37 39% 42 36% 88 36% 67 38% 66 45% 51 36% 116 51% 145 48% 149 49% 128 50% 150 56% 116 53%Total 94 100% 116 100% 247 100% 176 100% 148 100% 143 100% 228 100% 302 100% 306 100% 258 100% 267 100% 220 100%

18d. FEVALUAT Very little 15 16% 17 15% 33 13% 17 10% 15 10% 17 12% 8 4% 17 6% 23 8% 14 5% 17 6% 11 5%Making judgments about the value of information, arguments or methods such as

Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.)

Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluations of student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected course section to do their best work?

Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and readings so students can repeat them pretty much in the same form

Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its components

Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships

Student presentations

In-class writing

Testing and evaluation

Performances in applied and fine arts (e.g., dance, drama, music)

Page 106: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 106 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

Some 18 20% 33 29% 63 25% 43 25% 41 28% 44 30% 46 20% 61 20% 53 17% 40 15% 52 19% 42 19%Quite a bit 33 36% 41 36% 88 35% 63 36% 44 30% 36 25% 81 36% 106 35% 112 37% 103 40% 88 33% 97 44%

(was #20d. for 2004 admin) Very much 26 28% 22 19% 64 26% 52 30% 48 32% 49 34% 91 40% 120 39% 118 39% 102 39% 111 41% 70 32%Total 92 100% 113 100% 248 100% 175 100% 148 100% 146 100% 226 100% 304 100% 306 100% 259 99% 268 100% 220 100%

18e. FAPPLYIN Very little 6 6% 5 4% 14 6% 14 8% 8 5% 14 10% 5 2% 5 2% 12 4% 4 2% 10 4% 5 2%Some 16 17% 21 18% 55 22% 25 14% 28 19% 22 15% 32 14% 40 13% 36 12% 25 10% 28 10% 21 10%Quite a bit 31 33% 37 32% 75 30% 49 28% 47 32% 42 29% 61 27% 73 24% 81 26% 78 30% 76 28% 65 30%

(was #20e. for 2004 admin) Very much 40 43% 51 45% 104 42% 88 50% 66 44% 67 46% 131 57% 183 61% 177 58% 151 59% 156 58% 128 58%Total 93 100% 114 100% 248 100% 176 100% 149 100% 145 100% 229 100% 301 100% 306 100% 258 101% 270 100% 219 100%

19a. FGNWRITE Very little 25 27% 27 24% 42 17% 35 20% 31 21% 30 21% 30 13% 31 10% 22 7% 20 8% 18 7% 24 11%Some 22 23% 41 36% 62 25% 48 27% 38 26% 33 23% 49 21% 65 22% 68 22% 62 24% 62 23% 46 21%Quite a bit 29 31% 21 18% 59 24% 40 23% 36 24% 29 20% 61 27% 90 30% 88 29% 66 26% 72 27% 66 30%

(was #21a. for 2004 admin) Very much 18 19% 25 22% 85 34% 53 30% 44 30% 54 37% 88 39% 116 38% 128 42% 110 43% 116 43% 83 38%Total 94 100% 114 100% 248 100% 176 100% 149 100% 146 100% 228 100% 302 100% 306 100% 258 101% 268 100% 219 100%

19b. FGNSPEAK Very little 29 31% 41 37% 77 31% 52 30% 50 34% 38 26% 37 16% 50 17% 40 13% 41 16% 35 13% 43 20%Some 30 32% 36 32% 71 29% 55 31% 50 34% 53 37% 64 28% 97 32% 90 30% 58 23% 77 29% 69 32%Quite a bit 25 27% 18 16% 60 24% 37 21% 27 18% 29 20% 67 30% 95 32% 88 29% 93 36% 84 32% 55 26%

(was #21b. for 2004 admin) Very much 10 11% 17 15% 40 16% 31 18% 22 15% 25 17% 59 26% 59 20% 86 28% 64 25% 68 26% 48 22%Total 94 100% 112 100% 248 100% 175 100% 149 100% 145 100% 227 100% 301 100% 304 100% 256 100% 264 100% 215 100%

19c. FGNANALY Very little 1 1% 1 1% 2 1% 1 1% 3 2% 5 3% 1 0% 2 1% 1 0% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0%Some 8 9% 12 10% 32 13% 21 12% 14 9% 11 8% 11 5% 17 6% 19 6% 13 5% 14 5% 12 6%Quite a bit 30 32% 42 37% 89 36% 64 36% 60 40% 59 41% 68 30% 90 30% 83 27% 79 31% 71 27% 71 33%

(was #21c. for 2004 admin) Very much 54 58% 60 52% 125 50% 90 51% 72 48% 69 48% 147 65% 193 64% 202 66% 162 63% 180 68% 135 62%Total 93 100% 115 100% 248 100% 176 100% 149 100% 144 100% 227 100% 302 100% 305 100% 256 100% 265 100% 218 100%

19d. FGNQUANT Very little 29 32% 31 27% 91 37% 59 34% 53 36% 59 40% 79 35% 110 36% 105 34% 106 42% 101 38% 80 37%Some 19 21% 27 23% 42 17% 32 18% 33 22% 32 22% 43 19% 58 19% 66 22% 55 22% 57 22% 43 20%Quite a bit 15 16% 23 20% 60 24% 38 22% 25 17% 17 12% 38 17% 46 15% 50 16% 42 17% 39 15% 38 18%

(was #21d. for 2004 admin) Very much 29 32% 34 30% 54 22% 44 25% 36 24% 38 26% 68 30% 88 29% 85 28% 51 20% 68 26% 56 26%Total 92 100% 115 100% 247 100% 173 100% 147 100% 146 100% 228 100% 302 100% 306 100% 254 101% 265 100% 217 100%

19e. FGNCMPTS Very little 26 28% 31 27% 68 27% 60 34% 46 31% 40 28% 50 22% 73 24% 80 26% 57 22% 58 22% 49 22%Some 34 37% 37 32% 80 32% 51 29% 50 34% 56 39% 82 36% 107 36% 97 32% 96 37% 85 32% 75 34%Quite a bit 14 15% 26 23% 51 21% 40 23% 29 19% 24 17% 57 25% 67 22% 64 21% 52 20% 60 23% 46 21%

(was #21e. for 2004 admin) Very much 18 20% 20 18% 49 20% 25 14% 24 16% 25 17% 39 17% 53 18% 63 21% 53 21% 63 24% 48 22%Total 92 100% 114 100% 248 100% 176 100% 149 100% 145 100% 228 100% 300 100% 304 100% 258 100% 266 100% 218 100%

19f. FGNOTHER Very little 23 24% 24 21% 47 19% 33 19% 27 18% 22 15% 30 13% 44 14% 39 13% 30 12% 33 12% 28 13%Some 33 35% 35 30% 76 31% 46 26% 55 37% 50 34% 59 26% 77 25% 71 23% 68 26% 67 25% 63 29%Quite a bit 21 22% 35 30% 68 27% 55 31% 40 27% 38 26% 65 29% 82 27% 74 24% 59 23% 68 25% 58 26%

(was #21f. for 2004 admin) Very much 17 18% 23 20% 57 23% 42 24% 28 19% 35 24% 73 32% 101 33% 122 40% 101 39% 100 37% 70 32%Total 94 100% 117 100% 248 100% 176 100% 150 100% 145 100% 227 100% 304 100% 306 100% 258 100% 268 100% 219 100%

19g. FGNINQ Very little 1 1% 0 0% 4 2% 2 1% 4 3% 1 1% 4 2% 4 1% 3 1% 3 1% 0 0% 1 0%Some 8 9% 16 14% 39 16% 33 19% 17 11% 26 18% 19 8% 35 12% 35 12% 30 12% 45 17% 33 15%Quite a bit 52 55% 54 46% 114 46% 81 46% 66 44% 66 46% 112 49% 140 47% 157 52% 109 42% 101 38% 90 41%

(was #21g. for 2004 admin) Very much 33 35% 47 40% 90 36% 61 34% 63 42% 52 36% 92 41% 122 41% 109 36% 116 45% 121 45% 96 44%Total 94 100% 117 100% 247 100% 177 100% 150 100% 145 100% 227 100% 301 100% 304 100% 258 100% 267 100% 220 100%

19h. FGNSELF Very little 26 28% 34 30% 58 24% 29 17% 31 21% 34 23% 43 19% 60 20% 45 15% 35 14% 36 14% 36 17%Some 26 28% 30 26% 50 21% 52 30% 44 30% 39 27% 65 29% 90 30% 78 26% 60 24% 75 29% 63 30%Quite a bit 21 23% 33 29% 70 30% 50 29% 41 28% 39 27% 63 28% 92 31% 77 26% 77 31% 69 27% 62 29%

(was #21h. for 2004 admin) Very much 19 21% 18 16% 59 25% 42 24% 31 21% 34 23% 55 24% 57 19% 98 33% 76 31% 77 30% 51 24%Total 92 100% 115 100% 237 100% 173 100% 147 100% 146 100% 226 100% 299 100% 298 100% 248 100% 257 100% 212 100%

19i. FGNDIVER Very little 38 41% 55 49% 92 39% 66 38% 60 41% 49 34% 74 33% 98 33% 98 33% 63 25% 74 29% 63 30%Some 20 22% 23 20% 53 22% 44 25% 32 22% 42 29% 57 25% 83 28% 75 25% 64 25% 62 24% 63 30%Quite a bit 19 20% 21 19% 41 17% 33 19% 28 19% 22 15% 39 17% 56 19% 54 18% 58 23% 57 22% 40 19%

(was #21i. for 2004 admin) Very much 16 17% 14 12% 51 22% 31 18% 26 18% 31 22% 54 24% 61 20% 71 24% 70 27% 66 25% 47 22%Total 93 100% 113 100% 237 100% 174 100% 146 100% 144 100% 224 100% 298 100% 298 100% 255 100% 259 100% 213 100%

19j. FGNPROBS Very little 10 11% 25 22% 31 13% 26 15% 26 18% 23 16% 11 5% 30 10% 19 6% 26 10% 30 12% 15 7%Some 26 29% 31 27% 79 33% 58 33% 57 39% 49 34% 41 18% 69 23% 73 24% 59 23% 57 22% 53 25%Quite a bit 31 34% 37 32% 80 34% 56 32% 42 28% 49 34% 86 38% 101 34% 112 38% 79 31% 79 31% 71 33%

(was #21j. for 2004 admin) Very much 24 26% 21 18% 48 20% 34 20% 23 16% 25 17% 87 39% 99 33% 94 32% 89 35% 91 35% 75 35%Total 91 100% 114 100% 238 100% 174 100% 148 100% 146 100% 225 100% 299 100% 298 100% 253 99% 257 100% 214 100%

19k. FVALUES Very little 27 29% 38 34% 68 29% 54 31% 41 28% 46 32% 27 12% 56 19% 42 14% 40 16% 40 16% 31 14%Some 36 38% 39 35% 67 28% 58 33% 52 36% 47 32% 90 40% 93 31% 90 30% 77 30% 78 30% 75 35%Quite a bit 20 21% 17 15% 66 28% 31 18% 32 22% 29 20% 57 25% 87 29% 85 29% 68 27% 71 28% 59 27%

(was #21k. for 2004 admin) Very much 11 12% 19 17% 36 15% 31 18% 21 14% 23 16% 53 23% 64 21% 79 27% 69 27% 68 26% 50 23%Total 94 100% 113 100% 237 100% 174 100% 146 100% 145 100% 227 100% 300 100% 296 100% 254 100% 257 100% 215 100%

19l. FSPIRIT Very little 73 78% 88 77% 173 73% 135 78% 115 78% 120 83% 160 70% 230 78% 214 72% 179 71% 190 73% 147 70%Some 13 14% 18 16% 44 19% 22 13% 19 13% 16 11% 45 20% 38 13% 53 18% 42 17% 42 16% 48 23%Quite a bit 4 4% 5 4% 12 5% 11 6% 7 5% 3 2% 13 6% 20 7% 14 5% 18 7% 19 7% 10 5%

(was #21l. for 2004 admin) Very much 3 3% 3 3% 8 3% 6 3% 6 4% 6 4% 10 4% 7 2% 16 5% 14 6% 9 3% 6 3%Total 93 100% 114 100% 237 100% 174 100% 147 100% 145 100% 228 100% 295 100% 297 100% 253 101% 260 100% 211 100%

19m. FGNGENLE Very little 18 19% 17 15% 44 19% 20 12% 26 18% 25 17% 44 19% 59 20% 48 16% 62 24% 57 22% 40 19%Some 16 17% 38 34% 57 24% 55 32% 41 28% 43 30% 72 32% 94 32% 88 30% 62 24% 69 27% 68 32%Quite a bit 31 33% 37 33% 82 35% 57 33% 36 24% 44 30% 72 32% 89 30% 97 33% 64 25% 68 26% 65 30%

(was #21m. for 2004 admin) Very much 28 30% 21 19% 54 23% 40 23% 44 30% 33 23% 38 17% 54 18% 65 22% 68 27% 63 25% 41 19%Total 93 100% 113 100% 237 100% 172 100% 147 100% 145 100% 226 100% 296 100% 298 100% 256 100% 257 100% 214 100%

19n. FGNWORK Very little 8 9% 11 9% 27 11% 21 12% 17 12% 16 11% 13 6% 26 9% 10 3% 11 4% 11 4% 13 6%Some 23 25% 29 25% 67 28% 44 25% 39 27% 42 29% 42 18% 43 14% 45 15% 40 16% 44 17% 29 14%

Solving complex real-world problems

Developing a personal code of values and ethics

Developing a deepened sense of spirituality

Acquiring a broad general education

Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

Analyzing quantitative problems

Using computing and information technology

Working effectively with others

Learning effectively on their own

Understanding themselves

Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions

Writing clearly and effectively

Speaking clearly and effectively

Thinking critically and analytically

Page 107: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 Page 107 of 111

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %2011

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2011 2004 2006 20082010 20102009

Quite a bit 33 35% 37 32% 77 32% 51 29% 40 27% 46 32% 62 27% 90 30% 78 26% 77 30% 63 24% 64 30%(was #21n. for 2004 admin) Very much 29 31% 39 34% 67 28% 59 34% 50 34% 41 28% 112 49% 142 47% 165 55% 128 50% 141 54% 108 50%

Total 93 100% 116 100% 238 100% 175 100% 146 100% 145 100% 229 100% 301 100% 298 100% 256 100% 259 100% 214 100%20. APDISCOL Arts and humanities 19 21% 30 27% 51 24% 49 32% 34 26% 51 33% 37 17% 61 20% 57 21% 46 20% 52 22% 50 23%

Biological science 6 7% 6 5% 15 7% 6 4% 7 5% 9 6% 6 3% 7 2% 10 4% 9 4% 6 2% 5 2%Business 5 5% 9 8% 10 5% 11 7% 10 8% 9 6% 26 12% 33 11% 24 9% 26 11% 32 13% 19 9%Education 3 3% 3 3% 8 4% 3 2% 6 5% 2 1% 31 14% 34 11% 35 13% 29 13% 28 12% 28 13%Engineering 3 3% 10 9% 15 7% 14 9% 8 6% 6 4% 28 13% 25 8% 22 8% 13 6% 18 7% 15 7%Physical science 21 23% 21 19% 39 18% 25 16% 20 16% 29 19% 15 7% 26 9% 22 8% 14 6% 22 9% 15 7%Professional 11 12% 12 11% 8 4% 8 5% 7 5% 8 5% 17 8% 25 8% 26 10% 20 9% 19 8% 21 10%Social science 13 14% 11 10% 35 17% 25 16% 22 17% 22 14% 24 11% 44 15% 33 12% 46 20% 34 14% 36 17%

(was #25. - part of demographic questions - for 2004 admin) Other 11 12% 8 7% 31 15% 13 8% 15 12% 19 12% 38 17% 45 15% 39 15% 28 12% 30 12% 26 12%Total 92 100% 110 100% 212 100% 154 100% 129 100% 155 100% 222 100% 300 100% 268 100% 231 101% 241 100% 215 100%

Additionally, question #1g. was treated as two separate questions for the 2004 administration (only)Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %1g. FINDSTUD Not important 17 18% 41 18%

Somewhat important 29 31% 64 28%Important 36 38% 75 33%Very important 13 14% 50 22%Total 95 100% 230 100%

1h. FSDMAJOR Not important 45 48% 111 48%Somewhat important 38 40% 74 32%Important 9 10% 36 16%Very important 2 2% 9 4%Total 94 100% 230 100%

Additionally, question #8. was treated as "yes/no" to type of classroom formate for the 2004 administration (only)Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %8. TEACFORM No 95 99% 225 98%

Yes 1 4% 5 2%Total 96 100% 230 100%

Additionally, question #10. used a different breakout for the response options for the 2004 administration (only)Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %10. CT05 0 7 7% 15 7%

1 to 3 16 17% 58 25%4 to 6 22 23% 43 19%7 to 9 16 17% 30 13%10 to 15 12 13% 29 13%16 to 20 6 6% 18 8%20 or more 16 17% 37 16%Total 95 100% 230 100%

Additionally, question #14 b. and c. asked a different number of pages for the 2004 administration (only)Q# Question Variable Response Options Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %14b. FWRTMR05 None 75 80% 103 46%

1 13 14% 77 35%2-3 3 3% 33 15%4-6 1 1% 4 2%More than 6 2 2% 6 3%Total 94 100% 223 100%

14c. FWRTMD05 None 59 63% 77 35%1 14 15% 60 27%2-3 10 11% 64 29%4-6 5 5% 14 6%More than 6 5 5% 6 3%Total 93 100% 221 100%

Number of written papers or reports of 10 pages or more

Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 10 pages

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2004 2006 2008 2009 2010

What is the general discipline of your academic appointment? (Please specify an academic discipline)

2010

Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

Independent study

Lower Division Faculty

2010

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010

Lower Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2010

Self-designed major

Is your selected course a distance education course (correspondence course, Internet course, telecourse, etc.)?

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2004 2006 20082010 2010

2010

2010

2010

2010

2010

2006 2008 2009

2009

Upper Division Faculty2004

Upper Division Faculty

2010

20102004 2006 2008 2009

Page 108: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

FSSE Six-Year Trends: Engagement Item Frequency Distributions ComparisonWestern Michigan University

2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2004 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011Q# Question Variable Response Options % % % % % % Q# Question Variable Response Options % % % % % %1a. FINTERN Not important 6% 2% 5% 3% 5% 6% 1a. FINTERN Not important 4% 3% 3% 3% 1% 2%

Somewhat important 21% 16% 16% 14% 13% 16% Somewhat important 10% 15% 10% 10% 11% 8%Important 29% 28% 32% 28% 30% 30% Important 28% 23% 23% 24% 20% 25%Very important 43% 53% 47% 56% 51% 48% Very important 59% 59% 64% 63% 68% 64%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

1b. FVOLUNTR Not important 15% 7% 11% 9% 12% 13% 1b. FVOLUNTR Not important 14% 12% 10% 8% 9% 8%Somewhat important 40% 41% 33% 30% 33% 29% Somewhat important 30% 37% 32% 34% 31% 33%Important 25% 37% 37% 38% 39% 35% Important 38% 33% 36% 35% 36% 31%Very important 20% 15% 19% 23% 16% 23% Very important 17% 18% 22% 24% 24% 28%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

1c. FLERNCOM Not important 24% 20% 18% 16% 21% 19% 1c. FLERNCOM Not important 22% 16% 13% 16% 12% 13%Somewhat important 35% 38% 31% 32% 31% 31% Somewhat important 31% 38% 30% 29% 30% 29%Important 22% 27% 35% 35% 28% 34% Important 26% 25% 37% 33% 34% 40%Very important 18% 16% 16% 18% 20% 16% Very important 21% 21% 20% 23% 23% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

1d. FIMPR05 Not important 21% 11% 14% 5% 13% 13% 1d. FIMPR05 Not important 22% 12% 13% 14% 13% 11%Somewhat important 38% 35% 32% 37% 37% 34% Somewhat important 32% 34% 36% 35% 32% 39%Important 27% 39% 32% 38% 35% 35% Important 29% 36% 34% 31% 34% 37%

NOTE: slight change in question wording from 2004 admin Very important 14% 15% 22% 20% 15% 19% Very important 17% 18% 17% 21% 21% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

1e. FFORLANG Not important 13% 11% 15% 12% 11% 11% 1e. FFORLANG Not important 16% 12% 10% 12% 12% 11%Somewhat important 33% 29% 34% 31% 34% 35% Somewhat important 30% 35% 39% 29% 27% 30%Important 28% 37% 28% 34% 36% 28% Important 35% 32% 30% 35% 33% 36%Very important 26% 23% 24% 24% 19% 25% Very important 19% 21% 21% 25% 27% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

1f. FSTUDYAB Not important 16% 11% 21% 15% 19% 17% 1f. FSTUDYAB Not important 21% 18% 17% 16% 11% 12%Somewhat important 39% 40% 35% 33% 36% 36% Somewhat important 37% 38% 42% 35% 39% 38%Important 27% 26% 28% 32% 27% 28% Important 27% 26% 27% 32% 28% 33%Very important 18% 23% 16% 20% 18% 19% Very important 16% 19% 14% 17% 22% 18%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

1g. FINDST06 Not important 32% 33% 23% 23% 26% 30% 1g. FINDST06 Not important 33% 29% 28% 28% 27% 33%Somewhat important 36% 38% 38% 43% 41% 38% Somewhat important 30% 37% 38% 37% 38% 35%

** 2004 data is averaged -- see below for actual response rates ** Important 24% 22% 29% 26% 26% 22% ** 2004 data is averaged -- see below for actual response rates ** Important 24% 24% 27% 27% 21% 23%(was #1g. "FINDSTUD" and #1h. "FSDMAJOR" for 2004 admin) Very important 8% 7% 10% 8% 7% 11% (was #1g. "FINDSTUD" and #1h. "FSDMAJOR" for 2004 admin) Very important 13% 10% 7% 8% 14% 10%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%1h. FSENIOR Not important 10% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% 1h. FSENIOR Not important 7% 3% 3% 6% 1% 4%

Somewhat important 29% 13% 20% 11% 12% 11% Somewhat important 22% 15% 17% 13% 11% 14%Important 36% 33% 42% 42% 42% 42% Important 36% 31% 32% 35% 33% 36%Very important 26% 51% 36% 44% 42% 42% Very important 34% 52% 48% 47% 54% 46%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

2a. FENVSTU 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2a. FENVSTU 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%2 2% 2% 3% 0% 1% 0% 2 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1%3 10% 5% 5% 4% 5% 3% 3 2% 5% 6% 5% 3% 3%4 32% 18% 17% 20% 17% 20% 4 17% 18% 17% 15% 10% 14%5 32% 33% 37% 32% 38% 42% 5 38% 32% 29% 28% 35% 29%6 18% 33% 30% 33% 30% 27% 6 29% 33% 34% 40% 40% 41%7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 5% 11% 8% 12% 8% 9% 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 12% 10% 14% 11% 11% 11%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

2b. FENVFAC 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2b. FENVFAC 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%2 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 3%3 12% 7% 8% 6% 5% 4% 3 10% 6% 8% 3% 5% 4%4 23% 16% 24% 18% 19% 26% 4 14% 16% 20% 18% 15% 14%5 36% 32% 32% 32% 35% 33% 5 28% 31% 31% 35% 31% 34%6 17% 35% 25% 32% 33% 25% 6 34% 35% 26% 30% 33% 34%

(was #3. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 9% 8% 7% 10% 7% 8% (was #3. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 11% 9% 14% 10% 14% 11%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2c. FENVADM 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 8% 5% 4% 3% 5% 3% 2c. FENVADM 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sens 6% 6% 4% 3% 3% 3%2 18% 10% 12% 4% 12% 6% 2 16% 14% 13% 14% 10% 6%3 17% 25% 14% 15% 18% 16% 3 14% 20% 19% 15% 14% 15%4 26% 33% 27% 27% 17% 32% 4 25% 27% 23% 24% 25% 25%5 18% 17% 25% 25% 24% 26% 5 22% 18% 19% 21% 24% 28%6 10% 6% 14% 17% 19% 13% 6 10% 12% 15% 16% 17% 18%

(was #4. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 2% 4% 4% 8% 6% 4% (was #4. for 2004 admin) 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of 6% 3% 6% 6% 7% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

3a. FENVSCHO Very little 13% 11% 11% 6% 5% 7% 3a. FENVSCHO Very little 11% 10% 9% 9% 10% 11%Some 41% 36% 31% 32% 37% 33% Some 35% 36% 33% 30% 32% 33%Quite a bit 32% 43% 41% 41% 40% 43% Quite a bit 35% 39% 43% 42% 37% 42%

(was #5a. for 2004 admin) Very much 14% 11% 18% 21% 19% 17% (was #5a. for 2004 admin) Very much 19% 15% 15% 18% 21% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

3b. FENVSUPR Very little 8% 5% 3% 1% 3% 2% 3b. FENVSUPR Very little 5% 6% 4% 7% 6% 5%Some 34% 41% 28% 24% 29% 28% Some 36% 38% 26% 29% 27% 32%Quite a bit 42% 43% 45% 47% 42% 44% Quite a bit 38% 37% 49% 40% 41% 39%

(was #5b. for 2004 admin) Very much 16% 11% 23% 28% 26% 26% (was #5b. for 2004 admin) Very much 21% 19% 21% 24% 27% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

3c. FENVDIVR Very little 26% 25% 17% 15% 13% 11% 3c. FENVDIVR Very little 18% 20% 14% 18% 13% 9%Some 48% 46% 43% 39% 42% 44% Some 53% 49% 48% 45% 39% 44%Quite a bit 23% 28% 27% 32% 29% 31% Quite a bit 17% 22% 28% 26% 34% 34%

(was #5c. for 2004 admin) Very much 3% 2% 12% 14% 16% 14% (was #5c. for 2004 admin) Very much 12% 8% 10% 10% 14% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

3d. FENVNACA Very little 31% 32% 23% 17% 16% 13% 3d. FENVNACA Very little 33% 30% 26% 23% 20% 16%Some 53% 53% 49% 45% 54% 61% Some 44% 52% 51% 51% 47% 56%Quite a bit 15% 14% 21% 30% 23% 22% Quite a bit 20% 14% 19% 21% 25% 23%

(was #5d. for 2004 admin) Very much 1% 1% 6% 7% 7% 4% (was #5d. for 2004 admin) Very much 4% 3% 4% 5% 8% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

3e. FENVSOCA Very little 26% 17% 13% 11% 13% 11% 3e. FENVSOCA Very little 19% 20% 15% 12% 13% 8%Some 55% 66% 48% 48% 48% 49% Some 53% 57% 51% 52% 50% 54%Quite a bit 15% 15% 35% 30% 30% 34% Quite a bit 23% 21% 28% 31% 30% 31%

(was #5e. for 2004 admin) Very much 3% 2% 5% 11% 9% 7% (was #5e. for 2004 admin) Very much 5% 3% 6% 5% 7% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

3f. FENVACT Very little 10% 11% 5% 6% 5% 8% 3f. FENVACT Very little 7% 7% 6% 5% 7% 8%Some 50% 49% 42% 33% 35% 39% Some 46% 46% 42% 39% 37% 35%Quite a bit 37% 36% 36% 43% 44% 41% Quite a bit 39% 39% 40% 43% 39% 41%

(was #5f. for 2004 admin) Very much 3% 5% 16% 18% 16% 12% (was #5f. for 2004 admin) Very much 9% 8% 11% 13% 17% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

3g. FENVEVEN Very little 16% 11% 7% 6% 6% 8% 3g. FENVEVEN Very little 11% 10% 8% 6% 7% 9%Some 41% 43% 36% 31% 33% 34% Some 41% 44% 39% 25% 36% 37%Quite a bit 40% 38% 40% 45% 40% 44% Quite a bit 35% 36% 39% 51% 39% 37%

(was #5g. for 2004 admin) Very much 2% 9% 16% 17% 21% 15% (was #5g. for 2004 admin) Very much 13% 9% 15% 17% 18% 17%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

3h. FENVCOMP Very little 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 3h. FENVCOMP Very little 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%Some 9% 7% 6% 7% 12% 15% Some 9% 6% 9% 9% 8% 12%Quite a bit 36% 37% 45% 33% 33% 32% Quite a bit 39% 40% 35% 32% 31% 37%

(was #5h. for 2004 admin) Very much 54% 57% 49% 60% 54% 53% (was #5h. for 2004 admin) Very much 51% 54% 55% 58% 61% 50%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4a. UGTEACH 0 1% 2% 6% 2% 1% 0% 4a. UGTEACH 0 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2%1-4 25% 16% 40% 30% 28% 28% 1-4 19% 18% 32% 30% 29% 36%5-8 34% 41% 38% 44% 43% 37% 5-8 39% 39% 35% 41% 34% 36%9-12 29% 25% 11% 13% 18% 26% 9-12 24% 31% 21% 20% 25% 18%13-16 7% 8% 4% 7% 5% 4% 13-16 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 6%17-20 1% 6% 1% 2% 2% 3% 17-20 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2%21-30 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 21-30 2% 0% 1% 1% 2% 1%

(was #6a. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (was #6a. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4b. GRADEPAP 0 4% 5% 4% 1% 3% 1% 4b. GRADEPAP 0 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2%1-4 35% 31% 46% 50% 40% 36% 1-4 39% 31% 41% 42% 35% 39%5-8 34% 35% 33% 29% 32% 41% 5-8 34% 37% 32% 33% 35% 34%9-12 16% 20% 9% 11% 15% 11% 9-12 17% 19% 15% 13% 15% 12%13-16 6% 5% 4% 4% 8% 5% 13-16 6% 7% 6% 6% 8% 8%17-20 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 17-20 1% 3% 3% 4% 3% 1%21-30 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 21-30 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2%

(was #6b. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% (was #6b. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

4c. GRADEBCK 0 2% 3% 6% 3% 3% 0% 4c. GRADEBCK 0 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2%1-4 56% 52% 69% 66% 58% 59% 1-4 47% 49% 63% 60% 48% 58%5-8 30% 31% 18% 25% 25% 31% 5-8 33% 33% 22% 24% 29% 27%9-12 5% 8% 3% 4% 9% 6% 9-12 12% 9% 7% 10% 10% 6%13-16 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 13-16 2% 5% 3% 2% 8% 4%17-20 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 3% 17-20 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0%21-30 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 21-30 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2%

(was #6c. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% (was #6c. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

4d. CLASSPRP 0 0% 2% 4% 0% 1% 0% 4d. CLASSPRP 0 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1%1-4 22% 17% 44% 34% 30% 25% 1-4 19% 16% 29% 32% 24% 29%5-8 45% 32% 34% 40% 33% 43% 5-8 38% 41% 42% 34% 37% 41%9-12 22% 29% 10% 14% 23% 20% 9-12 21% 22% 19% 21% 21% 15%13-16 7% 8% 4% 7% 6% 8% 13-16 13% 11% 5% 7% 10% 7%17-20 1% 8% 3% 3% 5% 3% 17-20 4% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4%21-30 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 21-30 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2%

(was #6d. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% (was #6d. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4e. REFLECT 0 1% 2% 7% 0% 3% 2% 4e. REFLECT 0 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 0%1-4 68% 68% 71% 72% 71% 67% 1-4 70% 66% 71% 73% 73% 72%5-8 20% 23% 15% 19% 17% 21% 5-8 17% 22% 18% 15% 19% 21%9-12 5% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% 9-12 6% 5% 4% 6% 4% 2%13-16 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 4% 13-16 3% 3% 1% 2% 0% 1%17-20 2% 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% 17-20 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%21-30 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 21-30 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1%

(was #6e. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% (was #6e. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

4f. SCHOLAR 0 7% 6% 12% 8% 13% 7% 4f. SCHOLAR 0 3% 4% 8% 6% 4% 8%1-4 26% 31% 24% 32% 29% 28% 1-4 20% 17% 29% 27% 30% 29%5-8 27% 17% 17% 18% 21% 19% 5-8 27% 20% 16% 22% 20% 23%9-12 11% 17% 17% 12% 11% 13% 9-12 19% 20% 15% 15% 14% 15%13-16 6% 9% 9% 8% 6% 8% 13-16 9% 11% 9% 9% 10% 13%17-20 9% 7% 8% 12% 8% 14% 17-20 11% 13% 12% 7% 8% 5%21-30 9% 6% 8% 8% 6% 6% 21-30 5% 8% 6% 7% 8% 3%

(was #6f. for 2004 admin) More than 30 3% 7% 5% 2% 5% 4% (was #6f. for 2004 admin) More than 30 7% 6% 5% 6% 6% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

4g. FRESEARC 0 51% 43% 59% 58% 59% 52% 4g. FRESEARC 0 41% 35% 49% 46% 40% 49%1-4 36% 37% 30% 30% 29% 35% 1-4 38% 43% 36% 36% 41% 42%5-8 8% 11% 8% 7% 8% 6% 5-8 11% 17% 9% 12% 10% 6%9-12 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 9-12 6% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2%13-16 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 13-16 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1%17-20 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 2% 17-20 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0%21-30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 21-30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

(was #6g. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% (was #6g. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

4h. ADVISE 0 40% 32% 44% 43% 37% 41% 4h. ADVISE 0 25% 20% 32% 33% 26% 30%1-4 51% 51% 41% 44% 44% 43% 1-4 50% 56% 50% 48% 50% 52%5-8 8% 9% 7% 6% 9% 8% 5-8 18% 17% 12% 14% 15% 11%9-12 0% 3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 9-12 5% 4% 5% 4% 6% 4%13-16 0% 3% 2% 2% 2% 4% 13-16 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2%17-20 1% 0% 0% 1% 3% 0% 17-20 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0%21-30 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 21-30 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%

(was #6h. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% (was #6h. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4i. FIELDEXP 0 60% 66% 74% 82% 76% 71% 4i. FIELDEXP 0 48% 53% 58% 61% 57% 56%1-4 22% 24% 19% 14% 14% 15% 1-4 28% 30% 26% 22% 24% 29%5-8 14% 7% 5% 3% 6% 8% 5-8 14% 8% 7% 9% 10% 8%9-12 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 9-12 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4%13-16 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 13-16 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%17-20 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 17-20 0% 1% 1% 0% 2% 0%21-30 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 21-30 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1%

(was #6i. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (was #6i. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Community service or volunteer work

Participation in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

Work on a research project with a faculty

Lower Division Faculty Upper Division Faculty

Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Requiring students to spend significant amounts of time studying and on academic work

Providing students the support they need to help them succeed academically

Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Community service or volunteer work

Participation in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

Work on a research project with a faculty

Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Requiring students to spend significant amounts

Providing students the support they need to help

Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

Providing students the support they need to thrive socially

Foreign language coursework

Study abroad

Independent study or self-designed major

Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)

Student relationships with other students

Student relationships with faculty members

Preparing for class

Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching

Research and scholarly activities

Working with undergraduates on research

Advising undergraduate students

Supervising internships or other field experiences

Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.)

Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work

Teaching undergraduate students in class

Grading papers and exams

Giving other forms of written and oral feedback

Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

Providing students the support they need

Foreign language coursework

Study abroad

Independent study or self-designed major

Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)

Student relationships with other students

Student relationships with faculty members

Preparing for class

Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching

Research and scholarly activities

Working with undergraduates on research

Advising undergraduate students

Supervising internships or other field experiences

Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.)

Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work

Teaching undergraduate students in class

Grading papers and exams

Giving other forms of written and oral feedback

Page 109: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 100%4j. FFACOTHR 0 49% 46% 55% 58% 50% 56% 4j. FFACOTHR 0 38% 33% 41% 46% 43% 54%

1-4 45% 48% 33% 34% 43% 37% 1-4 47% 53% 47% 43% 45% 39%5-8 3% 3% 7% 6% 6% 4% 5-8 10% 11% 8% 8% 10% 5%9-12 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 9-12 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1%13-16 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 13-16 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0%17-20 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 17-20 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%21-30 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 21-30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

(was #6j. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% (was #6j. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

4k. FINTERAC 0 13% 16% 30% 24% 25% 23% 4k. FINTERAC 0 19% 14% 24% 24% 19% 29%1-4 66% 68% 55% 59% 53% 63% 1-4 61% 59% 63% 58% 63% 60%5-8 16% 11% 10% 12% 16% 9% 5-8 13% 20% 6% 12% 11% 9%9-12 4% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 9-12 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 1%13-16 0% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 13-16 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1%17-20 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 17-20 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0%21-30 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 21-30 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

(was #6k. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% (was #6k. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

4l. SERVICE 0 20% 25% 53% 41% 43% 45% 4l. SERVICE 0 19% 15% 36% 35% 32% 38%1-4 43% 40% 30% 43% 37% 36% 1-4 44% 47% 34% 35% 39% 36%5-8 23% 27% 10% 11% 15% 13% 5-8 24% 25% 18% 20% 18% 15%9-12 12% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 9-12 9% 8% 7% 5% 7% 6%13-16 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 13-16 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1%17-20 1% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 17-20 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%21-30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21-30 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1%

(was #6l. for 2004 admin) More than 30 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (was #6l. for 2004 admin) More than 30 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

5. In what format do you teach your selected course section? TEACFORM Classroom, on-campus 98% 97% 99% 98% 95% 5. In what format do you teach your selected course section? TEACFORM Classroom, on-campus 96% 94% 94% 93% 94%** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** Classroom, auxiliary location 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% ** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** Classroom, auxiliary location 3% 4% 3% 4% 2%(no #7. for 2004 admin, was #8. with "yes/no" response -- see below) Distance education 1% 0% 0% 2% 4% (no #7. for 2004 admin, was #8. with "yes/no" response -- see below) Distance education 1% 2% 3% 3% 4%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%6. GENEDREQ No 47% 33% 37% 40% 43% 6. GENEDREQ No 73% 67% 69% 67% 71%

Yes 53% 67% 63% 60% 57% Yes 27% 33% 31% 33% 29%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7. CS05 9 or less 0% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 7. CS05 9 or less 4% 4% 5% 8% 3% 4%10 to 19 6% 10% 11% 13% 6% 10% 10 to 19 17% 17% 19% 19% 21% 16%20 to 29 17% 16% 29% 23% 29% 30% 20 to 29 29% 29% 32% 31% 31% 41%

** 2004 data combined for "50 to 74" and "75 to 99" ** 30 to 49 25% 25% 26% 28% 24% 26% ** 2004 data combined for "50 to 74" and "75 to 99" ** 30 to 49 32% 30% 32% 27% 27% 20%** 2004 data combined for "100 to 149," "150 to 199," and "200 or more" ** 50 to 99 24% 24% 15% 17% 19% 19% ** 2004 data combined for "100 to 149," "150 to 199," and "200 or more" ** 50 to 99 14% 16% 12% 12% 16% 13%(was #9. "CRSSIZE" for 2004 admin) 100 or more 28% 23% 18% 18% 20% 14% (was #9. "CRSSIZE" for 2004 admin) 100 or more 3% 5% 1% 3% 3% 6%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%8. CT05 0 7% 12% 13% 4% 5% 8. CT05 0 6% 10% 8% 5% 9%

1 to 2 15% 26% 20% 11% 24% 1 to 2 16% 20% 19% 11% 15%3 to 9 38% 35% 33% 45% 35% 3 to 9 43% 41% 30% 36% 29%

** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 10 to 19 17% 16% 20% 21% 21% ** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 10 to 19 17% 16% 21% 22% 22%(was #10. "CRSTIMES" for 2004 admin) 20 or more 24% 11% 14% 18% 15% (was #10. "CRSTIMES" for 2004 admin) 20 or more 19% 13% 22% 26% 25%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%9. CSDISCOL Arts and Humanities 21% 29% 28% 33% 27% 9. CSDISCOL Arts and Humanities 17% 21% 23% 20% 22%

Biological science 11% 8% 7% 4% 7% Biological science 3% 3% 4% 4% 3%Business 4% 7% 3% 5% 10% Business 12% 12% 8% 10% 12%Education 1% 2% 3% 1% 4% Education 10% 9% 12% 15% 11%Engineering 3% 6% 6% 7% 5% Engineering 10% 8% 7% 7% 9%Physical science 22% 22% 19% 18% 17% Physical science 8% 9% 9% 5% 8%Professional 9% 7% 3% 6% 6% Professional 9% 7% 9% 7% 9%Social science 17% 9% 16% 16% 15% Social science 14% 16% 13% 19% 14%

(was #11. for 2004 admin) Other 12% 10% 14% 10% 10% (was #11. for 2004 admin) Other 17% 16% 15% 12% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100%

10a. FCLQUEST None 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 10a. FCLQUEST None 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0%1-24% 68% 54% 51% 52% 49% 53% 1-24% 42% 39% 36% 35% 37% 40%25-49% 22% 24% 27% 22% 28% 22% 25-49% 28% 29% 28% 33% 27% 23%50-74% 7% 14% 15% 19% 18% 15% 50-74% 17% 17% 19% 14% 19% 20%

(was #12a. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 1% 7% 6% 7% 5% 9% (was #12a. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 13% 14% 18% 17% 16% 16%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

10b. FCLUNPRE None 1% 0% 3% 5% 2% 2% 10b. FCLUNPRE None 4% 4% 4% 7% 6% 6%1-24% 32% 38% 43% 41% 37% 34% 1-24% 50% 48% 48% 49% 44% 49%25-49% 29% 33% 26% 23% 29% 32% 25-49% 26% 23% 25% 25% 28% 23%50-74% 31% 16% 22% 19% 23% 23% 50-74% 16% 15% 17% 12% 18% 16%

(was #12b. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 6% 14% 6% 11% 8% 9% (was #12b. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 4% 10% 6% 8% 5% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

10c. FWORKHRD None 4% 6% 6% 3% 4% 1% 10c. FWORKHRD None 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1%1-24% 41% 44% 47% 48% 38% 43% 1-24% 25% 31% 34% 32% 32% 32%25-49% 24% 25% 27% 25% 33% 29% 25-49% 38% 28% 30% 29% 31% 26%50-74% 24% 19% 17% 19% 21% 20% 50-74% 26% 29% 25% 24% 21% 28%

(was #12c. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 7% 6% 3% 4% 4% 6% (was #12c. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 9% 10% 9% 12% 14% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

10d. FEMAIL None 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 10d. FEMAIL None 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%1-24% 48% 42% 41% 44% 38% 36% 1-24% 40% 33% 28% 27% 30% 27%25-49% 30% 25% 26% 26% 29% 33% 25-49% 23% 28% 24% 24% 26% 30%50-74% 15% 20% 17% 15% 17% 17% 50-74% 20% 19% 22% 20% 16% 21%

(was #12d. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 5% 12% 16% 15% 16% 14% (was #12d. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 17% 19% 25% 29% 28% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

10e. FGRADE None 0% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 10e. FGRADE None 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%1-24% 62% 49% 51% 51% 52% 50% 1-24% 40% 41% 41% 40% 38% 39%25-49% 28% 28% 26% 29% 32% 28% 25-49% 30% 34% 22% 28% 29% 31%50-74% 6% 13% 14% 10% 7% 12% 50-74% 21% 16% 20% 16% 18% 19%

(was #12e. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 3% 9% 8% 7% 9% 10% (was #12e. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 9% 9% 15% 15% 15% 10%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

10f. FPLANS None 12% 7% 15% 12% 12% 11% 10f. FPLANS None 4% 4% 7% 7% 3% 9%1-24% 74% 67% 59% 59% 65% 64% 1-24% 52% 50% 44% 51% 54% 45%25-49% 7% 15% 11% 13% 12% 12% 25-49% 22% 20% 19% 14% 19% 21%50-74% 4% 5% 7% 9% 5% 8% 50-74% 9% 12% 15% 13% 11% 11%

(was #12f. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 2% 5% 8% 7% 7% 4% (was #12f. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 12% 14% 15% 15% 14% 14%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

10g. FIDEAS None 13% 9% 15% 14% 7% 10% 10g. FIDEAS None 6% 8% 9% 9% 6% 9%1-24% 73% 66% 63% 64% 73% 71% 1-24% 57% 57% 56% 55% 59% 57%25-49% 13% 18% 15% 16% 13% 11% 25-49% 21% 20% 20% 15% 19% 20%50-74% 2% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 50-74% 9% 9% 8% 10% 7% 8%

(was #12g. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 0% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% (was #12g. for 2004 admin) 75% or higher 6% 6% 6% 10% 9% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

11a. FDIVCLAS Never 42% 43% 34% 34% 41% 31% 11a. FDIVCLAS Never 25% 23% 26% 23% 25% 22%Sometimes 22% 30% 26% 34% 24% 27% Sometimes 30% 35% 30% 27% 28% 33%Often 20% 14% 21% 16% 20% 20% Often 22% 19% 20% 21% 22% 23%

(was #13a. for 2004 admin) Very often 16% 13% 18% 16% 16% 22% (was #13a. for 2004 admin) Very often 23% 24% 24% 29% 26% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11b. FCLASSGR Never 26% 20% 18% 18% 15% 19% 11b. FCLASSGR Never 17% 16% 14% 18% 13% 17%Sometimes 35% 33% 30% 30% 35% 30% Sometimes 24% 25% 25% 26% 31% 27%Often 16% 23% 28% 33% 25% 25% Often 26% 25% 25% 23% 23% 24%

(was #13b. for 2004 admin) Very often 23% 24% 24% 19% 25% 27% (was #13b. for 2004 admin) Very often 33% 34% 35% 33% 33% 32%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11c. FCOMMPRO Never 74% 80% 72% 77% 81% 75% 11c. FCOMMPRO Never 59% 69% 62% 66% 64% 66%Sometimes 15% 16% 17% 16% 13% 19% Sometimes 20% 16% 22% 19% 20% 20%Often 5% 2% 7% 3% 3% 5% Often 9% 7% 7% 8% 7% 7%

(was #13c. for 2004 admin) Very often 5% 2% 4% 4% 4% 1% (was #13c. for 2004 admin) Very often 12% 8% 9% 7% 8% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11d. FITICADE Never 29% 27% 31% 35% 30% 25% 11d. FITICADE Never 22% 26% 24% 24% 23% 24%Sometimes 31% 39% 31% 27% 33% 32% Sometimes 34% 33% 27% 24% 33% 29%Often 17% 16% 16% 16% 17% 15% Often 23% 17% 23% 21% 18% 22%

(was #13d. for 2004 admin) Very often 23% 18% 21% 21% 20% 27% (was #13d. for 2004 admin) Very often 21% 24% 27% 31% 26% 26%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11e. FFEED Never 0% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 11e. FFEED Never 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1%Sometimes 13% 12% 14% 15% 8% 14% Sometimes 8% 12% 9% 9% 9% 10%Often 31% 34% 35% 31% 41% 37% Often 34% 33% 37% 34% 29% 32%

(was #13e. for 2004 admin) Very often 57% 50% 48% 52% 50% 47% (was #13e. for 2004 admin) Very often 58% 54% 53% 55% 61% 57%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11f. FDIVRSTU Never 28% 27% 29% 32% 27% 22% 11f. FDIVRSTU Never 24% 23% 25% 23% 21% 20%Sometimes 49% 60% 46% 41% 50% 47% Sometimes 52% 53% 47% 48% 55% 50%Often 15% 9% 15% 19% 16% 18% Often 13% 16% 20% 17% 14% 20%

(was #13f. for 2004 admin) Very often 8% 4% 10% 8% 7% 13% (was #13f. for 2004 admin) Very often 10% 8% 9% 12% 11% 11%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11g. FDIFFSTU Never 30% 26% 29% 34% 28% 26% 11g. FDIFFSTU Never 24% 21% 23% 22% 21% 22%Sometimes 46% 60% 47% 45% 48% 42% Sometimes 46% 53% 47% 46% 51% 48%Often 15% 9% 14% 11% 17% 23% Often 15% 14% 17% 18% 15% 18%

(was #13g. for 2004 admin) Very often 9% 5% 10% 10% 7% 9% (was #13g. for 2004 admin) Very often 15% 12% 13% 14% 13% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

12a. FREADASG None 2% 3% 6% 3% 4% 7% 12a. FREADASG None 3% 2% 4% 5% 6% 6%1 46% 61% 57% 60% 60% 63% 1 37% 43% 48% 46% 48% 51%2-3 43% 30% 31% 32% 28% 22% 2-3 45% 42% 38% 40% 38% 34%4-6 7% 4% 5% 2% 7% 5% 4-6 10% 11% 7% 6% 4% 7%

(was #14a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 1% 2% 0% 3% 1% 3% (was #14a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 5% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

12b. FWRTMR05 None 89% 86% 90% 93% 88% 12b. FWRTMR05 None 68% 76% 75% 77% 75%1 8% 9% 7% 3% 8% 1 20% 17% 17% 17% 15%2-3 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2-3 10% 6% 7% 4% 6%

** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% ** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 2% 1% 0% 1% 3%(was #14b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% (was #14b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%12c. FWRTMD05 None 60% 62% 57% 61% 59% 12c. FWRTMD05 None 34% 41% 37% 38% 36%

1 19% 17% 20% 23% 18% 1 29% 28% 28% 30% 24%2-3 14% 14% 17% 12% 18% 2-3 25% 22% 25% 20% 26%

** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% ** 2004 data is not comparable -- see below for actual response rates ** 4-6 8% 5% 7% 9% 10%(was #14c. for 2004 admin) More than 6 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% (was #14c. for 2004 admin) More than 6 3% 4% 4% 3% 3%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%12d. FWRITSML None 39% 32% 23% 25% 26% 25% 12d. FWRITSML None 23% 24% 12% 16% 16% 20%

1 11% 8% 13% 14% 11% 15% 1 11% 8% 14% 12% 11% 9%2-3 14% 21% 22% 21% 23% 19% 2-3 26% 27% 23% 27% 30% 26%4-6 17% 16% 15% 18% 14% 11% 4-6 17% 19% 24% 18% 18% 17%

(was #14d. for 2004 admin) More than 6 20% 23% 26% 23% 26% 30% (was #14d. for 2004 admin) More than 6 24% 21% 26% 28% 26% 28%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

13a. FPROBSTA None 38% 26% 37% 43% 40% 38% 13a. FPROBSTA None 35% 36% 41% 37% 39% 37%1 46% 56% 38% 34% 32% 38% 1 46% 46% 34% 38% 33% 42%2-3 8% 14% 12% 11% 11% 9% 2-3 12% 12% 13% 12% 11% 8%4-6 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% 7% 4-6 3% 4% 3% 5% 6% 4%

(was #15a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 4% 3% 9% 8% 13% 9% (was #15a. for 2004 admin) More than 6 4% 3% 9% 8% 10% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

13b. FPROBSTB None 57% 45% 39% 36% 39% 40% 13b. FPROBSTB None 50% 51% 50% 45% 50% 47%1 32% 45% 33% 35% 36% 28% 1 34% 34% 30% 38% 26% 31%2-3 8% 6% 12% 11% 9% 14% 2-3 10% 9% 8% 6% 14% 12%4-6 1% 2% 4% 7% 4% 5% 4-6 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4%

(was #15b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 2% 2% 13% 12% 12% 13% (was #15b. for 2004 admin) More than 6 4% 2% 8% 8% 7% 6%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

14a. FEXPREP 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14a. FEXPREP 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1-2 4% 8% 17% 14% 7% 7% 1-2 3% 4% 8% 9% 5% 6%3-4 24% 28% 39% 31% 40% 31% 3-4 33% 27% 35% 32% 31% 37%5-6 36% 29% 25% 29% 30% 29% 5-6 33% 37% 30% 29% 25% 29%7-8 22% 16% 8% 17% 11% 15% 7-8 17% 17% 11% 15% 19% 13%9-10 11% 14% 7% 5% 8% 12% 9-10 11% 11% 10% 8% 11% 9%11-12 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 5% 11-12 1% 3% 2% 4% 5% 4%

(was #16a. for 2004 admin) More than 12 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% (was #16a. for 2004 admin) More than 12 3% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

14b. FACTPREP 0 3% 4% 9% 5% 3% 2% 14b. FACTPREP 0 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1%1-2 53% 47% 61% 57% 61% 58% 1-2 43% 38% 50% 48% 40% 50%3-4 31% 39% 22% 25% 26% 27% 3-4 30% 38% 30% 30% 32% 31%5-6 9% 7% 5% 9% 7% 10% 5-6 14% 15% 9% 13% 14% 8%7-8 1% 3% 3% 4% 1% 2% 7-8 7% 4% 5% 5% 7% 6%9-10 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 9-10 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 2%11-12 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 11-12 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1%

(was #16b. for 2004 admin) More than 12 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% (was #16b. for 2004 admin) More than 12 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

What is the general area of your selected course?

Frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments

Frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards

Occasionally use e-mail to communicate with you

Occasionally discuss grades or assignments with you

Working with students on activities other than course work (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

Other interactions with students outside of the classroom

Conducting service activities

Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campus? (was not part of 2004 admin)

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section?

Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

Receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic performance

Have serious conversations in your course with students of a different race or ethnicity than their own

Have serious conversations in your course with students who are very different from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings

Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

At least once, talk about career plans

At least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside of class

Have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.)

Work with other students on projects during class

Participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of your course

Use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment

Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

Number of problem sets that take your students more than one hour to complete

Number of problem sets that take your students less than one hour to complete

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you expect your students to spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you think your students actually spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

What is the general area of your selected course?

Frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments

Frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards

Occasionally use e-mail to communicate with you

Occasionally discuss grades or assignments with you

Working with students on activities other than course work (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

Other interactions with students outside of the classroom

Conducting service activities

Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campus? (was not part of 2004 admin)

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section?

Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

Receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic performance

Have serious conversations in your course with students of a different race or ethnicity than their own

Have serious conversations in your course with students who are very different from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings

Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

At least once, talk about career plans

At least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside of class

Have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.)

Work with other students on projects during class

Participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of your course

Use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment

Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

Number of problem sets that take your students more than one hour to complete

Number of problem sets that take your students less than one hour to complete

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you expect your students to spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours do you think your students actually spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

Page 110: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

15a. FREWROPA Not important 39% 47% 36% 42% 39% 35% 15a. FREWROPA Not important 27% 27% 21% 24% 23% 22%Somewhat important 24% 16% 20% 22% 24% 26% Somewhat important 23% 23% 28% 24% 24% 24%Important 20% 23% 22% 19% 19% 18% Important 25% 25% 27% 26% 28% 29%

(was #17a. for 2004 admin) Very important 17% 14% 22% 17% 18% 20% (was #17a. for 2004 admin) Very important 25% 25% 24% 26% 25% 24%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15b. FINTEGRA Not important 22% 24% 28% 25% 24% 21% 15b. FINTEGRA Not important 9% 10% 8% 8% 10% 9%Somewhat important 15% 21% 11% 15% 14% 12% Somewhat important 10% 11% 12% 13% 11% 10%Important 24% 19% 22% 25% 26% 30% Important 30% 23% 28% 22% 23% 25%

(was #17b. for 2004 admin) Very important 38% 36% 38% 35% 36% 36% (was #17b. for 2004 admin) Very important 52% 55% 53% 57% 56% 57%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15c. FOCCGRP Not important 25% 21% 33% 34% 33% 30% 15c. FOCCGRP Not important 17% 20% 18% 23% 19% 25%Somewhat important 25% 35% 24% 24% 29% 28% Somewhat important 29% 29% 27% 27% 26% 29%Important 29% 28% 28% 24% 24% 26% Important 29% 30% 28% 24% 33% 22%

(was #17c. for 2004 admin) Very important 21% 16% 15% 18% 13% 17% (was #17c. for 2004 admin) Very important 25% 21% 27% 27% 22% 25%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

15d. FINTIDEA Not important 23% 26% 22% 21% 22% 23% 15d. FINTIDEA Not important 7% 7% 9% 10% 10% 9%Somewhat important 35% 29% 37% 33% 35% 31% Somewhat important 25% 25% 27% 25% 28% 26%Important 23% 30% 29% 27% 29% 34% Important 35% 36% 35% 32% 33% 38%

(was #17d. for 2004 admin) Very important 19% 15% 12% 19% 13% 12% (was #17d. for 2004 admin) Very important 33% 31% 29% 33% 29% 27%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15e. FOOCID05 Not important 20% 24% 21% 18% 24% 14% 15e. FOOCID05 Not important 11% 14% 14% 12% 14% 14%Somewhat important 28% 37% 32% 32% 32% 40% Somewhat important 36% 30% 32% 34% 33% 33%

NOTE: slight change in question wording from 2004 admin Important 36% 23% 35% 32% 33% 28% NOTE: slight change in question wording from 2004 admin Important 37% 36% 33% 33% 31% 32%(was #17e. for 2004 admin) Very important 17% 16% 12% 19% 11% 17% (was #17e. for 2004 admin) Very important 17% 21% 22% 21% 22% 21%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%15f. FTUTOR Not important 48% 50% 41% 48% 48% 48% 15f. FTUTOR Not important 44% 46% 42% 46% 42% 45%

Somewhat important 26% 31% 34% 31% 29% 30% Somewhat important 31% 29% 30% 27% 33% 27%Important 19% 13% 18% 17% 18% 15% Important 17% 16% 17% 19% 19% 18%

(was #17f. for 2004 admin) Very important 7% 5% 6% 4% 5% 7% (was #17f. for 2004 admin) Very important 8% 8% 11% 8% 6% 9%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15g. FOWNVIEW Not important 20% 18% 11% 18% 17% 15g. FOWNVIEW Not important 11% 9% 9% 11% 9%Somewhat important 21% 18% 24% 22% 17% Somewhat important 20% 17% 17% 17% 16%Important 33% 33% 30% 28% 27% Important 35% 31% 29% 34% 33%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 26% 31% 35% 31% 39% (was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 35% 43% 45% 38% 41%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15h. FOTHRVW Not important 24% 23% 20% 21% 19% 15h. FOTHRVW Not important 13% 11% 13% 11% 13%Somewhat important 20% 13% 22% 19% 19% Somewhat important 19% 14% 13% 16% 15%Important 29% 29% 21% 23% 21% Important 28% 31% 25% 31% 25%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 27% 35% 38% 37% 41% (was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 40% 44% 49% 41% 46%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

15i. FCHNGVW Not important 5% 4% 2% 1% 4% 15i. FCHNGVW Not important 2% 1% 1% 1% 2%Somewhat important 13% 13% 8% 9% 11% Somewhat important 7% 7% 6% 6% 5%Important 27% 31% 31% 32% 25% Important 31% 28% 26% 29% 21%

(was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 55% 51% 60% 58% 60% (was not part of 2004 admin) Very important 60% 64% 67% 63% 72%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

16a. LECTURE 0% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 5% 16a. LECTURE 0% 6% 3% 5% 4% 1% 5%1-9% 11% 9% 12% 7% 8% 13% 1-9% 10% 11% 15% 12% 10% 12%10-19% 7% 5% 17% 12% 9% 11% 10-19% 12% 6% 14% 13% 15% 14%20-29% 4% 17% 15% 13% 9% 9% 20-29% 12% 15% 12% 13% 13% 12%30-39% 5% 12% 7% 7% 11% 9% 30-39% 8% 10% 11% 10% 10% 9%40-49% 19% 13% 16% 12% 17% 14% 40-49% 13% 13% 11% 12% 13% 9%50-74% 20% 18% 20% 23% 25% 23% 50-74% 21% 21% 25% 24% 24% 27%

(was #18a. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 32% 22% 12% 22% 18% 18% (was #18a. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 17% 22% 8% 12% 15% 13%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

16b. TEACHLED 0% 9% 6% 10% 8% 5% 7% 16b. TEACHLED 0% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 6%1-9% 24% 19% 24% 21% 21% 21% 1-9% 24% 18% 18% 18% 17% 19%10-19% 22% 22% 20% 25% 24% 30% 10-19% 21% 25% 30% 28% 28% 21%20-29% 16% 26% 17% 24% 21% 22% 20-29% 24% 19% 20% 21% 26% 21%30-39% 14% 7% 12% 8% 11% 6% 30-39% 12% 14% 11% 9% 12% 12%40-49% 7% 6% 8% 3% 2% 5% 40-49% 6% 8% 9% 7% 6% 8%50-74% 4% 6% 8% 7% 9% 5% 50-74% 6% 7% 7% 9% 6% 8%

(was #18b. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 4% 7% 2% 4% 6% 5% (was #18b. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 5% 3% 4% 1% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

16c. TEACHSTU 0% 58% 38% 41% 40% 32% 36% 16c. TEACHSTU 0% 26% 25% 29% 23% 25% 25%1-9% 21% 17% 20% 20% 21% 17% 1-9% 23% 25% 21% 27% 20% 22%10-19% 7% 18% 9% 17% 17% 20% 10-19% 13% 20% 14% 18% 21% 15%20-29% 6% 9% 9% 11% 10% 9% 20-29% 16% 14% 19% 12% 15% 12%30-39% 1% 6% 8% 2% 7% 4% 30-39% 11% 6% 7% 7% 7% 12%40-49% 3% 3% 6% 2% 3% 2% 40-49% 5% 4% 4% 5% 6% 6%50-74% 1% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 50-74% 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5%

(was #18c. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 3% 2% 2% 6% 5% (was #18c. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

16d. COMPMED 0% 65% 58% 54% 57% 56% 55% 16d. COMPMED 0% 54% 53% 61% 55% 51% 53%1-9% 15% 25% 21% 22% 21% 22% 1-9% 23% 21% 17% 17% 18% 17%10-19% 8% 6% 6% 7% 8% 7% 10-19% 11% 11% 9% 10% 13% 13%20-29% 5% 3% 5% 5% 2% 6% 20-29% 6% 7% 2% 6% 5% 5%30-39% 1% 4% 2% 2% 1% 3% 30-39% 3% 2% 3% 2% 4% 3%40-49% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 1% 40-49% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2%50-74% 0% 0% 4% 2% 3% 3% 50-74% 2% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3%

(was #18d. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 3% 3% 6% 3% 5% 2% (was #18d. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 2% 4% 5% 4% 4%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

16e. GROUPSML 0% 41% 26% 29% 24% 20% 18% 16e. GROUPSML 0% 23% 22% 22% 23% 18% 22%1-9% 18% 30% 24% 23% 26% 22% 1-9% 20% 21% 19% 20% 23% 20%10-19% 16% 20% 16% 22% 16% 22% 10-19% 23% 21% 22% 22% 22% 22%20-29% 11% 11% 13% 17% 15% 13% 20-29% 18% 15% 15% 16% 14% 11%30-39% 3% 7% 4% 3% 9% 6% 30-39% 8% 9% 7% 5% 10% 9%40-49% 8% 1% 7% 4% 4% 9% 40-49% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 6%50-74% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 8% 50-74% 2% 5% 5% 4% 4% 7%

(was #18e. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 2% 4% 2% 7% 3% (was #18e. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

16f. STUPRES 0% 61% 58% 55% 57% 52% 41% 16f. STUPRES 0% 30% 32% 34% 33% 36% 36%1-9% 23% 24% 25% 21% 21% 35% 1-9% 27% 31% 26% 31% 28% 25%10-19% 7% 10% 9% 12% 16% 14% 10-19% 19% 24% 24% 19% 16% 21%20-29% 3% 3% 6% 5% 3% 5% 20-29% 13% 7% 10% 8% 11% 10%30-39% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 30-39% 5% 3% 3% 4% 6% 4%40-49% 1% 0% 2% 1% 2% 2% 40-49% 2% 1% 1% 3% 0% 0%50-74% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 50-74% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3%

(was #18f. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% (was #18f. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

16g. CLSWRITE 0% 61% 54% 52% 52% 52% 43% 16g. CLSWRITE 0% 46% 47% 51% 46% 45% 45%1-9% 24% 31% 28% 29% 27% 24% 1-9% 36% 34% 31% 32% 31% 35%10-19% 12% 9% 10% 14% 9% 13% 10-19% 12% 14% 9% 10% 14% 11%20-29% 2% 3% 5% 2% 7% 7% 20-29% 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 6%30-39% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 30-39% 2% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1%40-49% 0% 1% 3% 2% 2% 3% 40-49% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 0%50-74% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 4% 50-74% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2%

(was #18g. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% (was #18g. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

16h. TESTEVAL 0% 3% 7% 12% 10% 5% 11% 16h. TESTEVAL 0% 8% 8% 15% 14% 11% 17%1-9% 41% 46% 45% 50% 43% 38% 1-9% 46% 45% 45% 47% 35% 38%10-19% 41% 39% 27% 26% 39% 27% 10-19% 35% 34% 31% 23% 39% 30%20-29% 11% 6% 8% 6% 7% 11% 20-29% 5% 8% 4% 10% 7% 8%30-39% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1% 7% 30-39% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 4%40-49% 0% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 40-49% 2% 0% 1% 2% 1% 0%50-74% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 3% 50-74% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2%

(was #18h. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 0% 1% 3% 1% 2% (was #18h. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

16i. PERFORM 0% 96% 88% 90% 93% 89% 86% 16i. PERFORM 0% 94% 92% 91% 91% 90% 93%1-9% 1% 4% 4% 2% 3% 5% 1-9% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3%10-19% 0% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 10-19% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1%20-29% 1% 4% 0% 2% 2% 2% 20-29% 0% 1% 2% 0% 3% 1%30-39% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 30-39% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%40-49% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 40-49% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%50-74% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 50-74% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1%

(was #18i. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% (was #18i. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

16j. EXPERIEN 0% 66% 54% 60% 60% 54% 62% 16j. EXPERIEN 0% 52% 55% 58% 59% 54% 56%1-9% 9% 13% 9% 10% 14% 12% 1-9% 11% 13% 10% 12% 12% 12%10-19% 7% 7% 6% 9% 10% 5% 10-19% 10% 8% 6% 11% 9% 7%20-29% 7% 12% 6% 7% 4% 5% 20-29% 7% 7% 5% 6% 9% 5%30-39% 4% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 30-39% 6% 5% 7% 1% 3% 3%40-49% 2% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 40-49% 4% 6% 4% 1% 3% 4%50-74% 4% 4% 6% 2% 4% 3% 50-74% 6% 4% 4% 4% 5% 6%

(was #18j. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 1% 2% 7% 6% 7% 5% (was #18j. for 2004 admin) 75% or more 4% 3% 7% 4% 6% 7%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 100%

17. FEXAMS 1 Very little 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 17. FEXAMS 1 Very little 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1%2 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0%3 4% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 3 3% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1%4 6% 20% 19% 10% 11% 12% 4 4% 7% 7% 11% 9% 9%5 29% 21% 31% 35% 31% 34% 5 27% 25% 26% 23% 23% 22%6 39% 40% 30% 34% 33% 33% 6 41% 44% 35% 39% 38% 40%

(was #19. for 2004 admin) 7 Very much 20% 16% 15% 15% 19% 16% (was #19. for 2004 admin) 7 Very much 24% 23% 27% 25% 27% 25%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

18a. FMEMORIZ Very little 27% 34% 27% 33% 20% 31% 18a. FMEMORIZ Very little 42% 31% 38% 41% 38% 40%Some 35% 41% 38% 36% 41% 31% Some 35% 45% 34% 34% 36% 38%Quite a bit 30% 22% 25% 22% 28% 22% Quite a bit 16% 19% 21% 20% 19% 17%

(was #20a. for 2004 admin) Very much 9% 4% 9% 10% 12% 16% (was #20a. for 2004 admin) Very much 7% 6% 7% 5% 6% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

18b. FANALYZE Very little 0% 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% 18b. FANALYZE Very little 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%Some 13% 12% 12% 10% 12% 12% Some 9% 9% 9% 10% 8% 12%Quite a bit 47% 49% 44% 38% 45% 43% Quite a bit 39% 38% 44% 42% 40% 36%

(was #20b. for 2004 admin) Very much 40% 35% 42% 47% 41% 41% (was #20b. for 2004 admin) Very much 52% 53% 46% 47% 51% 51%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

18c. FSYNTHES Very little 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 18c. FSYNTHES Very little 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0%Some 15% 20% 22% 18% 16% 16% Some 9% 9% 10% 12% 11% 7%Quite a bit 43% 41% 39% 40% 34% 42% Quite a bit 39% 41% 40% 36% 31% 40%

(was #20c. for 2004 admin) Very much 39% 36% 36% 38% 45% 36% (was #20c. for 2004 admin) Very much 51% 48% 49% 50% 56% 53%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

18d. FEVALUAT Very little 16% 15% 13% 10% 10% 12% 18d. FEVALUAT Very little 4% 6% 8% 5% 6% 5%Some 20% 29% 25% 25% 28% 30% Some 20% 20% 17% 15% 19% 19%Quite a bit 36% 36% 35% 36% 30% 25% Quite a bit 36% 35% 37% 40% 33% 44%

(was #20d. for 2004 admin) Very much 28% 19% 26% 30% 32% 34% (was #20d. for 2004 admin) Very much 40% 39% 39% 39% 41% 32%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

18e. FAPPLYIN Very little 6% 4% 6% 8% 5% 10% 18e. FAPPLYIN Very little 2% 2% 4% 2% 4% 2%Some 17% 18% 22% 14% 19% 15% Some 14% 13% 12% 10% 10% 10%Quite a bit 33% 32% 30% 28% 32% 29% Quite a bit 27% 24% 26% 30% 28% 30%

(was #20e. for 2004 admin) Very much 43% 45% 42% 50% 44% 46% (was #20e. for 2004 admin) Very much 57% 61% 58% 59% 58% 58%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

19a. FGNWRITE Very little 27% 24% 17% 20% 21% 21% 19a. FGNWRITE Very little 13% 10% 7% 8% 7% 11%Some 23% 36% 25% 27% 26% 23% Some 21% 22% 22% 24% 23% 21%Quite a bit 31% 18% 24% 23% 24% 20% Quite a bit 27% 30% 29% 26% 27% 30%

(was #21a. for 2004 admin) Very much 19% 22% 34% 30% 30% 37% (was #21a. for 2004 admin) Very much 39% 38% 42% 43% 43% 38%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

19b. FGNSPEAK Very little 31% 37% 31% 30% 34% 26% 19b. FGNSPEAK Very little 16% 17% 13% 16% 13% 20%Some 32% 32% 29% 31% 34% 37% Some 28% 32% 30% 23% 29% 32%Quite a bit 27% 16% 24% 21% 18% 20% Quite a bit 30% 32% 29% 36% 32% 26%

(was #21b. for 2004 admin) Very much 11% 15% 16% 18% 15% 17% (was #21b. for 2004 admin) Very much 26% 20% 28% 25% 26% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19c. FGNANALY Very little 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 19c. FGNANALY Very little 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0%Some 9% 10% 13% 12% 9% 8% Some 5% 6% 6% 5% 5% 6%Quite a bit 32% 37% 36% 36% 40% 41% Quite a bit 30% 30% 27% 31% 27% 33%

(was #21c. for 2004 admin) Very much 58% 52% 50% 51% 48% 48% (was #21c. for 2004 admin) Very much 65% 64% 66% 63% 68% 62%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19d. FGNQUANT Very little 32% 27% 37% 34% 36% 40% 19d. FGNQUANT Very little 35% 36% 34% 42% 38% 37%Some 21% 23% 17% 18% 22% 22% Some 19% 19% 22% 22% 22% 20%Quite a bit 16% 20% 24% 22% 17% 12% Quite a bit 17% 15% 16% 17% 15% 18%

(was #21d. for 2004 admin) Very much 32% 30% 22% 25% 24% 26% (was #21d. for 2004 admin) Very much 30% 29% 28% 20% 26% 26%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

19e. FGNCMPTS Very little 28% 27% 27% 34% 31% 28% 19e. FGNCMPTS Very little 22% 24% 26% 22% 22% 22%

Work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions

Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or issue

Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

Small group activities

Student presentations

In-class writing

Testing and evaluation

Performances in applied and fine arts (e.g., dance, drama, music)

Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.)

Try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from that person's perspective

Learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or concept

Lecture

Teacher-led discussion

Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

Student computer use

Writing clearly and effectively

Speaking clearly and effectively

Thinking critically and analytically

Analyzing quantitative problems

Using computing and information technology

Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluations of student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected course section to do their best work?

Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and readings so students can repeat them pretty much in the same form

Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its components

Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships

Making judgments about the value of information, arguments or methods such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions

Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

Work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions

Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or issue

Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

Small group activities

Student presentations

In-class writing

Testing and evaluation

Performances in applied and fine arts (e.g., dance, drama, music)

Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.)

Try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from that person's perspective

Learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or concept

Lecture

Teacher-led discussion

Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

Student computer use

Writing clearly and effectively

Speaking clearly and effectively

Thinking critically and analytically

Analyzing quantitative problems

Using computing and information technology

Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluations of student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected course section to do their best work?

Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and readings so students can repeat them pretty much in the same form

Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its components

Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships

Making judgments about the value of information, arguments or methods such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions

Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

Page 111: Western Michigan Universitywmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u405/2018/FSSE 6-Year... · Institutional Effectiveness: CKS - 9/22/2011 0% 10%. 20%. 30%. 40%. 50%. 60%. 70%.

Some 37% 32% 32% 29% 34% 39% Some 36% 36% 32% 37% 32% 34%Quite a bit 15% 23% 21% 23% 19% 17% Quite a bit 25% 22% 21% 20% 23% 21%

(was #21e. for 2004 admin) Very much 20% 18% 20% 14% 16% 17% (was #21e. for 2004 admin) Very much 17% 18% 21% 21% 24% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19f. FGNOTHER Very little 24% 21% 19% 19% 18% 15% 19f. FGNOTHER Very little 13% 14% 13% 12% 12% 13%Some 35% 30% 31% 26% 37% 34% Some 26% 25% 23% 26% 25% 29%Quite a bit 22% 30% 27% 31% 27% 26% Quite a bit 29% 27% 24% 23% 25% 26%

(was #21f. for 2004 admin) Very much 18% 20% 23% 24% 19% 24% (was #21f. for 2004 admin) Very much 32% 33% 40% 39% 37% 32%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19g. FGNINQ Very little 1% 0% 2% 1% 3% 1% 19g. FGNINQ Very little 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0%Some 9% 14% 16% 19% 11% 18% Some 8% 12% 12% 12% 17% 15%Quite a bit 55% 46% 46% 46% 44% 46% Quite a bit 49% 47% 52% 42% 38% 41%

(was #21g. for 2004 admin) Very much 35% 40% 36% 34% 42% 36% (was #21g. for 2004 admin) Very much 41% 41% 36% 45% 45% 44%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19h. FGNSELF Very little 28% 30% 24% 17% 21% 23% 19h. FGNSELF Very little 19% 20% 15% 14% 14% 17%Some 28% 26% 21% 30% 30% 27% Some 29% 30% 26% 24% 29% 30%Quite a bit 23% 29% 30% 29% 28% 27% Quite a bit 28% 31% 26% 31% 27% 29%

(was #21h. for 2004 admin) Very much 21% 16% 25% 24% 21% 23% (was #21h. for 2004 admin) Very much 24% 19% 33% 31% 30% 24%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19i. FGNDIVER Very little 41% 49% 39% 38% 41% 34% 19i. FGNDIVER Very little 33% 33% 33% 25% 29% 30%Some 22% 20% 22% 25% 22% 29% Some 25% 28% 25% 25% 24% 30%Quite a bit 20% 19% 17% 19% 19% 15% Quite a bit 17% 19% 18% 23% 22% 19%

(was #21i. for 2004 admin) Very much 17% 12% 22% 18% 18% 22% (was #21i. for 2004 admin) Very much 24% 20% 24% 27% 25% 22%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19j. FGNPROBS Very little 11% 22% 13% 15% 18% 16% 19j. FGNPROBS Very little 5% 10% 6% 10% 12% 7%Some 29% 27% 33% 33% 39% 34% Some 18% 23% 24% 23% 22% 25%Quite a bit 34% 32% 34% 32% 28% 34% Quite a bit 38% 34% 38% 31% 31% 33%

(was #21j. for 2004 admin) Very much 26% 18% 20% 20% 16% 17% (was #21j. for 2004 admin) Very much 39% 33% 32% 35% 35% 35%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

19k. FVALUES Very little 29% 34% 29% 31% 28% 32% 19k. FVALUES Very little 12% 19% 14% 16% 16% 14%Some 38% 35% 28% 33% 36% 32% Some 40% 31% 30% 30% 30% 35%Quite a bit 21% 15% 28% 18% 22% 20% Quite a bit 25% 29% 29% 27% 28% 27%

(was #21k. for 2004 admin) Very much 12% 17% 15% 18% 14% 16% (was #21k. for 2004 admin) Very much 23% 21% 27% 27% 26% 23%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19l. FSPIRIT Very little 78% 77% 73% 78% 78% 83% 19l. FSPIRIT Very little 70% 78% 72% 71% 73% 70%Some 14% 16% 19% 13% 13% 11% Some 20% 13% 18% 17% 16% 23%Quite a bit 4% 4% 5% 6% 5% 2% Quite a bit 6% 7% 5% 7% 7% 5%

(was #21l. for 2004 admin) Very much 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% (was #21l. for 2004 admin) Very much 4% 2% 5% 6% 3% 3%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

19m. FGNGENLE Very little 19% 15% 19% 12% 18% 17% 19m. FGNGENLE Very little 19% 20% 16% 24% 22% 19%Some 17% 34% 24% 32% 28% 30% Some 32% 32% 30% 24% 27% 32%Quite a bit 33% 33% 35% 33% 24% 30% Quite a bit 32% 30% 33% 25% 26% 30%

(was #21m. for 2004 admin) Very much 30% 19% 23% 23% 30% 23% (was #21m. for 2004 admin) Very much 17% 18% 22% 27% 25% 19%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

19n. FGNWORK Very little 9% 9% 11% 12% 12% 11% 19n. FGNWORK Very little 6% 9% 3% 4% 4% 6%Some 25% 25% 28% 25% 27% 29% Some 18% 14% 15% 16% 17% 14%Quite a bit 35% 32% 32% 29% 27% 32% Quite a bit 27% 30% 26% 30% 24% 30%

(was #21n. for 2004 admin) Very much 31% 34% 28% 34% 34% 28% (was #21n. for 2004 admin) Very much 49% 47% 55% 50% 54% 50%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

20. APDISCOL Arts and humanities 21% 27% 24% 32% 26% 33% 20. APDISCOL Arts and humanities 17% 20% 21% 20% 22% 23%Biological science 7% 5% 7% 4% 5% 6% Biological science 3% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2%Business 5% 8% 5% 7% 8% 6% Business 12% 11% 9% 11% 13% 9%Education 3% 3% 4% 2% 5% 1% Education 14% 11% 13% 13% 12% 13%Engineering 3% 9% 7% 9% 6% 4% Engineering 13% 8% 8% 6% 7% 7%Physical science 23% 19% 18% 16% 16% 19% Physical science 7% 9% 8% 6% 9% 7%Professional 12% 11% 4% 5% 5% 5% Professional 8% 8% 10% 9% 8% 10%Social science 14% 10% 17% 16% 17% 14% Social science 11% 15% 12% 20% 14% 17%

(was #25. - part of demographic questions - for 2004 admin) Other 12% 7% 15% 8% 12% 12% (was #25. - part of demographic questions - for 2004 admin) Other 17% 15% 15% 12% 12% 12%Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

Acquiring a broad general education

Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

What is the general discipline of your academic appointment? (Please specify an academic discipline)

Learning effectively on their own

Understanding themselves

Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

Solving complex real-world problems

Developing a personal code of values and ethics

Developing a deepened sense of spirituality

Working effectively with others

Working effectively with others

Acquiring a broad general education

Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

What is the general discipline of your academic appointment? (Please specify an academic discipline)

Learning effectively on their own

Understanding themselves

Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

Solving complex real-world problems

Developing a personal code of values and ethics

Developing a deepened sense of spirituality


Recommended