Date post: | 16-Jan-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | garycrichlow |
View: | 192 times |
Download: | 0 times |
EU ETS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE
AVIATION INDUSTRY
Gary CrichlowSenior Analyst
ASCEND
Westminster Energy, Environment & Transport Forum Keynote Seminar: Aviation and Shipping
11th March 2010
THE EU ETS: INTRODUCES ANOTHER SOURCE OF RISK THAT THE INDUSTRY MUST MANAGE
Credit risk: EU ETS cost burden on industry for compliance
Operational risk: Compliance with EU ETS submissions deadlines
and regulations
Country risk: Political stance towards the EU ETS’ legality
for non-EU-based operators
Asset risk: Aircraft residual values, economic useful life
Reputational risk: Public image for non-compliant carriers
?
3
THE EU ETS – AVIATION’S EXPOSURE
Medium haul: 1,501–3,000nm4% of 2008 mvmts6% of 2008 seats
FRA
EU ETS would have covered 4m scheduled airline movements, 0.5bn seats in 2008
Short haul:<1,500nm90% of 2008 mvmts81% of 2008 seats
Long-haul:>3,000nm7% of 2008 mvmts14% of 2008 seats
44
THE EU ETS COST BURDEN ON OPERATORS
Administrative costs of compliance Monitoring, reporting & verification
Cost of CO2 credits
Allocation of free credits
Trading on the open market: current EUA ~ €13/tonne
Penalties for non-compliance / shortfall €100/tonne plus cost of required credits
Competitive distortion — carbon leakage to other regions?
EXAMPLE: EASYJET
London Gatwick(LGW)
Helsinki (HEL)
Heraklion (HER)
1,863 km
2,683 km
Short/medium-haul A320 fleet Typical daily routing:
4 legs, 2 × daily rotation: LGW-HEL, LGW-HER
1,863 km
2,683 km
LGW-HEL
LGW-HER
Typical round-trip fare €200 €250
Allowance cost per pax* €2.52 €3.39
CO2 allowance add-on 1.3% 1.4%
* Assuming round-trip, 65% load factor, €40 cost per allowance
Source: Ecometrica, easyJet
2009 pre-tax profit margin 1.6%
EXAMPLE: EASYJET – ANNUAL COMPLIANCE BURDEN
London Gatwick
Helsinki
Heraklion
1,863 km
2,683 km
1,863 km
2,683 km
$0.4m $0.4m
$6.9m
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
US
$ m
illio
n p
er
ye
ar
2009 average profitper aircraft
CO2 cost ifcompliant
CO2 cost: worst-case non-compliance
Sources: Ascend, Ecometrica, easyJetAssumes US$/€ exchange rate of US$1.49, EUA price of €40/tonneCompliance includes qualifying for 82% free allowances
7
PASSING ON COSTS: DEMAND ELASTICITY
SHORT-HAUL LONG-HAUL
Price elasticity
CO2 allowance cost
Price elasticity
CO2 allowance cost
Carbon leakage risk Carbon leakage risk
Competition from LCCs, rail, etc Fewer alternatives
Level playing field Greater possibility to bypass EU for connections e.g. DXB
EU ETS COST BURDEN: KEY TAKE-AWAY POINTS
Compliance costs marginal BUT industry margins already razor-thin
Cost pass-through: dependent on market
dynamics & underlying economic picture
It will affect weaker players “on the edge”
Heavy penalties for non-compliance
THANK YOU!
Gary CrichlowSenior AnalystAscend
Barry MossPrincipal
Avocet Risk Consultants