CONVENTION ON WETLANDS (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel. +41-22-999-0170, Fax +41-22-999-0169 E-mail: ramsar@ramsar.org, Web: http://ramsar.org/

Wetlands for the Future Fund (WFF) Section E

Standard format for the preparation of Final Reports (To be filled in by the implementing agency/organization/proponent)

Country: Turkey Title of the Project: Effective Management of Ramsar Sites in Turkey Project code: 7501-400/SGF/08/TU Year of approval: 2008 Project Officer (see Section 5 below for further details): Can Yeniyurt Date project was completed: March 2010 Date final report provided: August 2010 Have you provided the Final Report in electronic as well as hard copy format? Have you enclosed? a) Some suitable photographs or color slides (with the necessary description) illustrating the project? Yes b) the copies of the materials produced with WFF funding (if applicable)? No 1. Abstract The project started to be implemented by April 2009. The initial action undertaken for the project was to explore the existing wetland management structures in Turkey. Meetings were held with NGOs and Government institutions to generate ideas for the best wetland management structure based in the previous experiences in Turkey. Following the outputs of these meetings were discussed with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry but also with the key decision-makers and diverse stakeholders in the Kızılırmak Delta. As a result, all parties agreed that it would be beneficial to identify a different additional management structure than the Local Wetland Commission. The responsibility of the Local Wetlands Commission covers all the wetlands within a province and only includes members at provincial level but the setting up of technical commission for a specific area including members from land users such as farmer etc. will support the successful implementation of the wetland management plan. Successively, we directed our activities to support the establishment of a Technical Commission for the Kızılırmak Delta by the Local Wetlands Commission. Our first activity with the Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission was to organise a field visit to the Gediz Delta. The aim of the visit was to create a ground for experience sharing between the two deltas. The technical commission was especially asked to evaluate the Gediz Delta Union model and learn about their experiences but also to explore the similarities about the management process of the Gediz Delta. During the fieldtrip several different stakeholder meetings were also organised for experience sharing.

In accordance with our second project objective, the preparation of a guidebook about the Ramsar Sites in Turkey has been initiated. Initially it was planned to prepare a simple booklet about the Ramsar Sites in Turkey but after a series of consultation with the Ministry it has been decided that it would be a book that would give more details about the areas. This decision leads the project team to spend more time on the preparation, design and translation of the book. The book is expected to be finalised and published by late September – Early October 2010. The content of the book describes the values, issues, management planning process for each Ramsar Sites in Turkey. Under the 3rd objective of the project a fieldwork was carried out in two intervals to eight Ramsar Sites that are in the process of implementing their management plans. The first trip was made with the collaboration of Serhan Çağırankaya from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Melike Hemmami, Water Policy Coordinator of Doğa Derneği and Can Yeniyurt, Project Officer and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) Officer of Doğa Derneği. The first trip included Burdur Lake, Gediz Delta, Manyas Lake and Uluabat Lake. The second trip was made with the collaboration of Serhan Çağırankaya from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Esther Koopmanschap, Centre for Development Innovation also Ramsar CEPA Board Member, Melike Hemmami, Water Policy Coordinator of Doğa Derneği and Can Yeniyurt, Project Officer and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) Officer of Doğa Derneği. The second fieldtrip included Sultan Marshes, Yumurtalık Lagoons and the Göksu Delta. An additional trip was made by the Project Officer Can Yeniyurt to the Kızılırmak Delta. During both fieldtrip interviews were carried out with the Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry officers responsible for the implementation of the management plan in their area. Additionally, when possible other institutions and stakeholders were also consulted. Finally, the outputs of the interviews were shared in a meeting held in Samsun with all the Management Plans responsible staff members of the Provincial Directorates of the Ministry of Environment of all the Ramsar Sites in Turkey. The relevant NGOs representatives were also present in the workshop. The workshop was a success by ensuring the participation of 56 persons from different areas in Turkey. The workshop outputs were also included in the Ramsar Sites Management Plan evaluation report. 2. Achievements against each project objective In a separate page for each objective of the project, as stated in the project proposal, please indicate the output(s) in terms of: a) Task completed or b) Task only partially completed or c) Task not attempted and in addition, in the same page, please provide a summary of action(s) taken for each output.

Objective 1. To increase public participation in management of Turkey's Ramsar Sites at local level – Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar Site model case a) Task Completed Output 1: Legal Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar Site Local Management System

Following the kick-off meeting of the project in April 2009, in order to identify the appropriate local management structure for Kızılırmak Delta the Project Officer initiated a research, meetings and interviews with relevant stakeholders in the area of Wetlands Management Planning. In order to reach this aim, the first action undertaken was to evaluate the existing management structures in the Ramsar Sites with management plan in Turkey.

Uluabat Lake An Uluabat lake Management Plan Steering Committee is set up under Bursa Local Wetland Commission. The meeting of this committee is constituted by local authorities and NGOs based in the region

Gediz Delta The implementation of the Gediz Delta Management Plan is undertaken by Izmir Bird Paradise Conservation and Development Union in coordination with the Provincial Directorate of MoEF. The finance of the Union is generated through the municipalities of the area which spare 1000/1 of their annual budget for the union.

Burdur Lake No specific body has been set up for the Management of the Burdur Lake. The decisions are made through the Burdur Local Wetlands Commission and the secretariat is undertaken by the Provincial Directorate of MoEF.

Yumurtalık Lagoons A Steering Committee under the Adana Local Wetlands Commission is responsible of the implementation of the Yumurtalik Lagoons Management Plan which can set up a technical commission formed by expert wherever it might be needed. The Members of this commission are the staff of the Governorship, Municipalities of the area, Village Mukhtars (elected headman of the village), Water Products Kooperatives, Hunting club members.

Kızılırmak Delta No specific Management Structure other than the Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry before this project.

Manyas Lake No specific Management Structure other than the Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry – However, the existence of a National Park Facility by the site create a different opportunity in terms of Communication and the Control of the site

Sultan Marshes No specific Management Structure other than the Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

Göksu Delta EPASA and Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

After the compilation of information related to different management structure these were evaluated together with the Wetlands Division of the MoEF and several NGOs (WWF Turkey, Bird Research Society - KAD) experienced in the area of Wetlands Management Planning in

Turkey. The discussions were focused on the advantages and disadvantages of the existing structure and on how could this be developed further for better success in the implementation of Wetland Management Plans in Turkey (Activity 1.1). The outputs of these meetings and consultation process were then shared with relevant stakeholders in the Kızılırmak Delta such as the decision makers (Governorship of Samsun, Special Province Administration, Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry, Provincial Directorate of the Agriculture, State Hydraulic Works, Administrative District of Bafra, Administrative District of Ondokuzmayis District), but also stakeholders like Ondokuzmayis Hunting Club, Bafra Hunting Club, Municipality of Doganca, Municipality of Yorukler, headmen of the villages around the site. Furthermore, additional meetings were held at the Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry with the above-mentioned stakeholders for further discussions and the development of the best management structure idea for the Kızılırmak Delta (Activity 1.2). As a result of this consultation process the Local Wetlands Commission of Samsun Province decided to establish a Technical Commission for the Kızılırmak Delta in order to support the implementation of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan. The reason under the need of establishing such a technical commission was fed by the need of having a closer link with primary stakeholders in the area. The technical commission would also enable the land users to participate to the decision taking processes about the site and also would support the site to be managed together with the stakeholders. The members of the technical commission were;

• The Head of the Administrative District of Bafra • The Head of the Administrative District of Alaçam • The Head of the Administrative District of Ondokuzmayıs • The Faculty of Agriculture of Ondokuzmayıs University • The Faculty of Science of Ondokuzmayıs University • Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI) • Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs • Provincial Commission for the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage • Samsun Nature Protection Association • The Municipality of Doğanca • The Municipality of Yörükler • Provincial Chamber of Agriculture • Yörükler Water Products Cooperative • Ondokuz Mayıs Hunting Club • Bafra Hunting Club • Special Provincial Administration

The difference of this Commission compared to the Samsun Local Wetland Commission is the participation of the last 7 Members in the list above. The Commission meets at regular intervals (once in two months) and coordinates the implementation of management plan of the Delta.

The next step undertaken in this project was to organise a study tour to the Gediz Delta together with 4 members (Governorship of Samsun, Municipality of Doganca, Provincial Directorate of Agriculture, Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry) of the newly set up technical commission. The aim of the visit was to create a ground for experience sharing among both sites. During three days, many meetings were held with different stakeholders of the Gediz Delta region. The Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission members were especially impressed of the structure of the Union and how it was possible to generate finance through the Municipalities. Another impressive point was the coordination among the different stakeholders of the Delta by organising monthly meetings with all the parties involved in the management plan of the site. Many discussions were also made on the common problems face in both sites, these discussion raised the importance to foreseen some problems that might generate in the Kızılırmak Delta in the future. The fact of Gediz Delta being close to a big city like Izmir creates a lot of threats for the site. The technical commission realised the importance of taking preventive steps in order not to face the same problems in the Kızılırmak delta in the future. The visit also raised awareness on how to make use of the bird diversity as an added value for the region. This aspect of the Gediz Delta was thought of a good development to be used in the Kizilirmak Delta in order to create an opportunity to attract tourist to the site and making use of it as an income generating opportunity and the advantage of how the presence of a centre supports the attraction to the site. The period where the study tour was done the relations between the Provincial Directorate of MoEF and the Union was in very good terms also involving closely the NGOs of the region which was also a point that was valued by the Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission. Another beneficial aspect of the visit was to see how one of the Technical Commission members had a change of attitude according what he saw in the Gediz Delta. It was the second visit of the Doganca Municipality Chief, the first time he visited the site, he had met a farmer dealing with husbandry complaining how it was no longer possible to do husbandry in the area because of the protected area status. However, this visit allowed the mayor to see how the problems related to husbandry were solved with dialogue. This information had an important impact on boosting certain prejudice on nature conservation activities (Activity 1.3). The agenda of the study visit can be found as attachment 2 and the participants list as attachment 3. In order to develop the Terms of Reference of the Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission a meeting was organised before the Gediz Delta study visit in order to evaluate the existing different structure. This meeting resulted with the decision of accepting the implementation of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan as the main responsibility of the Technical Commission. This decision remained the same after the study visit to the Gediz Delta. However, the experience of the study visit was shared with the rest of the members as important points to take into consideration during the implementation of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan. The Study tour also underlined the importance of the role of the Provincial Directorate of MoEF as a secretariat which should be facilitating the coordination of different stakeholders but also to

support the Technical Commission in their task (Activity 1.4). Finally, this activity had an impact on increasing the communication level with the Technical Commission members and the Provincial Directorate of MoEF. This communication process also created a basis on searching together finance opportunities like the Special Provincial Directorate of Administration of Samsun offering their opportunities to write proposals for the implementation of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan.

The Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission gathered 6 times from June 2009 - March 2010. The initial meetings were mainly to discuss the implementation and monitoring of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan. The first steps were to have presentations on what was so far implemented by different stakeholders. This also created an opportunity to share information among different stakeholders. The evaluation of this activities made by the Technical Commission were then presented to the Samsun Local Wetlands Commission (activity 1.5). The first decision taken with all the stakeholders after the end of the project was on agreeing on the construction of an interception channel planned under the Bafra plain left bank irrigation project.

Objectives 2: To promote Ramsar sites’ values and public participation approaches in their management planning to central and local key stakeholders Task Partially Completed A small booklet was initially prepared last year in July including brief information on Ramsar Sites in Turkey. However, after many discussions with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Wetlands Division it has been decided that it would be more appropriate and useful to increase the content of the booklet in order allow more space to share the management planning process. This change requires more time for the preparation of the booklet and couldn’t be finalised so far. The book is expected to be published by Late September 2010 – Early October 2010. The content of the book will be as follow;

• Description of Wetlands

• The importance of Wetlands Ecosystems

• The Ramsar Convention and Turkey

• Ramsar Sites of Turkey

• Sultan Marshes, Kuş Lake (Manyas), Seyfe Lake, Göksu Delta, Burdur Lake, Kızılırmak Delta, Uluabat Lake, Gediz Delta, Akyatan Lagoon, Yumurtalik Lagoons, Kızören Obruğu, Meke Maarı, Kuyucuk Lake.

Each site will include a brief site definition, information on the management structure and it’s past. Up to this point, the areas which the contents are finalised are sent to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Wetlands Division for their approval and immediately sent for translation in English. The poster will also be prepared in the same period as according the discussions held with the Ministry it would be more appropriate to design a poster coherent with the booklet. Once both materials are published it will be shared with all the relevant stakeholders in the Ramsar Sites in Turkey but also different Ministries at Central Level.

Objectives 3. To share Ramsar site management planning expertise throughout Turkey. Task Completed The activity has been initiated by making a research on different tools used for Management Plan Evaluation in order to develop/adapt a methodology for the assessment of the implemented Ramsar Site Management Plans in Turkey. Accordingly a quick assessment form including open ended questions were prepared for the fieldtrip (details on the methodologies are included in the fieldwork report). Eight Ramsar Sites were visited during this fieldwork with different experts as mentioned in the abstract of this report. Those areas were the Göksu Delta, Kus Lake (Manyas),

Uluabat Lake, Gediz Delta, Kızılırmak Delta, Sultan Marshes, Yumurtalık Lagoons and the Burdur Lake. In each area, the Provincial Directorate of Ministry of Environment and Forestry responsible departments were visited and discussions about the implementation of Ramsar Sites Wetlands Management Plans were discussed. However, during the discussion the management plan development processes were also discussed (Activity 3.1).

The fieldwork report including the meeting outcomes is about to be finalised and will soon be shared with relevant stakeholders. The English version of the report will also be sent to the Ramsar Secretariat once completed. The main issues in terms of implementing the Wetlands Management Plans that we encountered in most of the sites were the lack of knowledge on the wetland management planning process, the participation concept perceived in different levels and lack of capacity on biodiversity monitoring. Another issue often mentioned was the lack of financial resources and the frequent changes occurring in the Government staff resulting of new persons being responsible of the management plans implementation process without having a clear idea on the preparation process (Activity 3.2). Following an experience sharing workshop of two days has been organised in Samsun. The date of the workshop has been selected to also take the opportunity to celebrate the World Wetlands Days. All the Ramsar Site responsible government officers and several NGOs and University members working in different Ramsar Sites in Turkey were present in the meeting. For more information, the programme and the participants list is annexed to this report (Activity 3.3). The beginning of the meeting was mainly focused on the celebration of the World Wetlands Day where the Director of the Nature Conservation Department of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Mr. Ali Mennan Mennanoğulları honoured the meeting with an opening speech underlining the importance of wetlands ecosystem also by their services to the local communities in terms of economical benefits. Mr. Mennanoğulları also raised the importance of protecting the wetlands with regards the possible future water shortage threats. The director of the Provincial Directorate of the MoEF, Mr. Ömer Albayrak in his speech especially pointed out the importance of the Kızılırmak Delta as a Ramsar Site and the necessity of being able to protect the site for future generations. Finally, the Vice-Governor of Samsun, Ramazan Aksoy honoured the morning session with a speech on the importance of wetlands and his experience related the Sultan Marshes, the place where he originally comes from. The opening speeches were followed by various presentations on Ramsar Convention related activities in Turkey. The representative of the Ramsar secretariat Nadezhda Alexeeva presented a presentation on Wetland Management Planning and links with the Ramsar Convention. The afternoon session was allocated for group working on discussions about the main topics that emerged from the fieldtrip interviews. The participants divided on different topics such as monitoring, legislation, participation, finance and land use pressure to discuss the common problems of different sites followed by discussion on the possible solutions and finally the necessary management structure to address these issues. The

outputs of the meeting have been integrated within the Ramsar Site Management Plans Implementation report (Activity 3.4). The programme and participants list of the meeting is annexed to this report.

The second day of the meeting was allocated to a field visit in the Kızılırmak Delta where the participants from different Ramsar Sites were able to see the Kızılırmak Delta but also the facilities of the National Parks that newly has been constructed to undertake activities targeting the visitors.

3. Overall project outcomes Overall, has the project achieved what it set out to do? Yes If No, please indicate the reasons for failing to meet the overall objective. Please provide information about two or three lessons learned in the implementation of the Project. It would have been beneficial to have invited the managers of the Gediz Delta to the Kızılırmak Delta in order to have more members of the technical commission benefiting from their management experience

The workshop organised in Samsun showed the importance of bringing together the managers of different Ramsar Sites to enable them to share their experiences but also discuss their common problems which could need a more collective approach to find solutions. 4. Recommendations for future follow-up and conclusions The Wetlands Management Plans in Turkey are often prepared by NGOs, Companies and in some cases by Government Officers from the Central Level. The time limit for the development of a plan is maximum 3 years. However, the implementation of the plan is left to the Provincial Directorate of MoEF. The feedback received during the field interviews shows that the parties have serious difficulties to implement and understand the logic of the management planning process and accordingly faces difficulties to coordinate the implementation. Once a management plan is developed for a site it is vital to ensure 2-3 years support to the site in terms management planning logic and tools that would contribute to its successful implementation. The lack of sufficient staff in the local directorates has important impacts for monitoring activities. The project showed once again the importance of developing upper level strategy that could impact the National Policies to allocate sufficient staff to undertake monitoring activity. The main reasons of the problems encountered in the Ramsar Sites of Turkey are caused by wrong irrigation techniques used in Agricultural lands and the pollution created by these lands. It is vital to develop ideas/projects in order to solve these problems. Most of the Management Plans in Turkey are not easily implemented because of the lack of financial resources. The development of projects to implement certain activities existing in the management plan could be a good opportunity to support the implementation of the management plans. Many projects were implemented in Turkey in order to raise awareness and increase capacity on participatory approaches in the development process of wetlands management plans. The evaluation of different management plans in the course of time does show important improvements in terms of the increase of attempts to develop plans in a more participatory way. However, the perception on the level of participation is still not sufficient for the successful implementation of the plans as it was not possible to see a general ownership feeling of the plan by different stakeholders in most of the sites. Supporting activities that improve participation comes out as an important point for the future. 5. Budgetary details Please submit a detailed expenditure and income account referring to the original Project budget. Indicate expenditure and income in the currency(s) in which they have actually occurred, and as necessary provide the exchange rate into Swiss Francs to be applied. Please attach a separate finance report table (preferably in Excel or Word) which presents all the expenditures in the categories of the original budget, as well as a summary table with the totals by category. Were all funds allocated to the project from the WFF spent in accordance with the project specifications and approved budget? Yes The detailed Budget Report is provided as Attachment - 6

6. Project Officer (person responsible for executing the project) Name: Can Yeniyurt Signature: Institution: Doga Dernegi Date: Address: Hürriyet Cad. 43/12 Dikmen / Ankara / Turkey 06460

7. General Director of Doga Dernegi Name: Bahtiyar Kurt Signature: Institution: Doga Dernegi Date: Address: Hürriyet Cad. 43/12 Dikmen / Ankara / Turkey 06460

8. Approved by the Ramsar Administrative Authority Name: Yaşar Dostbil Signature: Administrative Authority: General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks Ministry of Environment and Forestry Date: Address: Söğütözü Cad. No: 14 / E Kat: 14 / Ankara /Turkey 06560

Attachment -1 Summary Project

Turkey has declared 12 Ramsar Sites since 1994 upon ratification of Ramsar convention with a total surface area of 179.773 ha. In 2002 “The Regulation on The Conservation of Wetlands” was entered in the force (and revised in 2005) by The Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Up to now, the Management Plans of 6 Ramsar sites was entered in to force, nowadays for 2 Ramsar Sites Management Plans are prepared. Additionally, in 2003 National Wetland Strategy (2003-2008) was accepted and is being implemented. It has been experienced that in Turkey implementation of management plans need a local management system for effective management and monitoring of these sites. There is a need to encourage establishment of local management systems in all Ramsar sites and other wetlands for wise use of wetlands. Ramsar sites, their values and participatory systems in management are not well-known enough by key stakeholders. There is a need to publish and widely distribute informational materials on Turkey’s Ramsar sites and their values. Since 1994, Turkey has been party to the Ramsar Convention, local and central ministerial experts gained experience in management planning and monitoring of wetlands. For wise use of wetlands in Turkey, there is a need to share this experience throughout Turkey through a meeting and report. This project’s aim objective is to enhance effective conservation of Turkey's Ramsar sites. This project proposal addresses these specific objectives in Ramsar Strategic Plan 2003-2008 operational objectives: 1. To increase public participation in management of Turkey's Ramsar Sites at local level - Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar Site model case (Operational Objective 11 through enhancing establishment of local management systems in Ramsar sites as cross-sectoral management committees) 2. To promote Ramsar sites’ values and public participation approaches in their management planning to central and local key stakeholders (Operational Objective 6 through well known values of Ramsar sites by related stakeholders) 3. To share Ramsar site management planning expertise throughout Turkey Operational Objective 14 through experience share in management planning and monitoring of Turkey’s Ramsar sites) First specific objective will be implemented in Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar site, which is one of the most important delta ecosystems in Black Sea coast. Management plan of this site has been finalized in 2007 with Ministry of Environment and Forestry and Doga Dernegi’s close cooperation. Kızılırmak Delta local management system will be the main responsible body for effective implementation and monitoring of this management plan for many years. DD will continue to play its main role in Kızılırmak Delta management plan activities and assist local management system members. The Ramsar site booklets and posters will be used by many stakeholders to inform their members for many years. Turkey’s Ramsar site management planning lessons learnt report will be the main resource for current management planning activities in Turkey. As the NGO member of the National Wetland Commission in Turkey, DD will follow up the results of the project and use and lobby for its results for the wise use of wetlands in Turkey.

Attachment - 2 Under Objective 3: Sharing Ramsar site management planning expertise and information in Turkey’s experience with other wetlands in Turkey Gediz Delta Experience Sharing Visit Dates: 22nd, 23rd and 24th of July 2009

22nd of July, 2009 – Arrival to Izmir

23rd July 2009

09.00 – 09.15 Opening speech

09.15 – 09.30 Project presentation, Doga Dernegi

09.30 – 10.00 Gediz Delta presentation, Doga Dernegi

10.00 – 11.00 Gediz Delta Management Plan, Izmir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of

Environment and Forestry Office

11.00 – 11.15 Coffee break

11.15 – 12.15 Management Plan Implementation Process, Protection and Development Union of

Izmir Bird Paradise

12.30–14.00 Lunch

14.00–15.30 Gediz Delta Field trip

24 July 2009 - Departure

Attachment -3 Participation List of the Gediz Delta Experience Sharing Visit

Date : 23 July 2009

Location : Đzmir, Gediz Delta

Name Foundation Phone E-mail

Ali Aydın Đzmir Provincial Directorate

of the Ministry of

Environment and Forestry

+905323635133 aliaydin09@gmail.com

Durmuş Yıldız Samsun Provincial Directorate

of the Ministry of Agriculture

and Rural Affairs

+903622313700 durmusyildiz_1952@yahoo.com

Fatih Bulut Samsun Provincial Directorate

of Environment and Forestry

+905388591566 fatihbulut55@hotmail.com

Đsmail Mutlu The Municipality of Doğanca

+905323714837 Imutlu-55@hotmail.com

Nilsun Ege

Polat

Đzmir Provincial Directorate

of the Ministry of

Environment and Forestry

+902323696485 nilsunpolat@mynet.com

Ömer

Döndüren

Izmir Bird Paradise

Conservation and

Development Union

+905374257895 dondurenomer@mynet.com

Selin Koptu Đzmir Provincial Directorate

of the Ministry of

Environment and Forestry

+905326322202 selinkoptu@yahoo.com

Sema Arıman Samsun Province Special

Provincial Administration

+905325046430 semaariman@gmail.com

Attachment -4 Programme of the “National Ramsar Site Management Experience

Sharing” Meeting

World Wetlands Day " National Ramsar Site Management Experience Sharing Meeting "

2-3 February 2010

2 February 2010 / Tuesday

Samsun / Ondokuzmayıs University Tepe Hotel

Time Content Speakers 09:00 Registration

9:30 Opening Speeches

Ramazan AKSOY, Governorship of Samsun Ali Mennan MENNANOĞULLARI, Ministry of Environment and Forestry Ömer ALBAYRAK , Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

Melike HEMMAMĐ, Doğa Derneği

10:00 “Voice of the Wetlands” Video Show Ministry of Environment and Forestry

10:15 Activities related to the Ramsar Convention in Turkey

Serhan ÇAĞIRANKAYA, Ministry of Environment and Forestry

10:40 Effective Management of Ramsar Sites in Turkey Project Melike HEMMAMĐ, Doğa Derneği

11:00 Coffee Break

11:30 The Ramsar Convention and Wetlands Management Planning

Nadezhda ALEXEEVA, Ramsar Convention Secretariat

12:00 Kızılırmak Delta Ömer ALBAYRAK, Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

12:30 Lunch

13:30 National Ramsar Site Management Experience Sharing Question & Answer Group work

15:00 Coffee Break

15:30 National Ramsar Site Management Experience Sharing Question & Answer Group work

18:00 Closure

19:00 Dinner

3 February 2010 / Wednesday - Samsun / Kızılırmak Delta

09:00 Departure

12:00 Lunch

13:30 Kızılırmak Delta Field Visit

17:00 Arrival

Attachment -5 Participants Lists of the “National Ramsar Site Management Experience Sharing” Meeting

No Name Foundation

1 Abdullah Sevinç Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

2 Ahmet Aydın Yörükler Water Products Cooperative

3 Ahmet Ulusoy Bafra Hunting Club

4 Ali Mennan Mennanoğulları Ministry of Environment and Forestry

5 Alpay Tırıl Sinop University

6 Evrim Sönmez Interpreter

7 Ayhan Arıkan Kırşehir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

8 Ayhan Boyacı The Head of the Administrative District of Bafra

9 Berrin Tanrınur Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

10 Can Yeniyurt Doğa Derneği

11 Deniz Güler Egedoğa Association

12 Durmuş Yıldız Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs

13 Elif Okumuş Wetlands Division, Ministry of Environment and Forestry

14 Ergin Öztürk The Faculty of Agriculture of Ondokuzmayıs University

15 Ersan Berberoğlu Burdur Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

16 Fatih Bulut Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

17 Ferrah Çakır Balıkesir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

18 Fikret Coşuner Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

19 Galena Đş World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Turkey)

20 Gökhan Hacıömeroğlu Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works

21 Gülsüm Mumcu The Faculty of Science of Ondokuzmayıs University

22 Hakan Arslan Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works

23 Hayri Öztürk Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs

24 Hidayet Topçu Bursa Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

25 Đhan Cin Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Agriculture

26 Đlker Özbahar Turkish Bird Research Society

27 Đsa Eroğlu S.S. Yörükler Agicultural Development Cooperative

28 Kadir Ekinci

The Head of the Administrative District of Ondokuzmayıs

29 Kiraz Erciyas Ornithological Research Center Ondokuz Mayis University

30 Mazlume Mazlumoğlu Adana Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

31 Mehmet Şener Konya Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

32 Melike Hemmami Doğa Derneği

33 Menderes Alan Samsun Provincial Commission for the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage

34 Murat Demir Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

35 Murat Doğanay Kars Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

36 Murat Saraç Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works

37 Mustafa Kurtulan Mersin Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

38 Muzaffer Çelik Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

39 Nadezhda Alexeeva Ramsar Convention Secretariat

40 Nagehan Acır Adana Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

41 Necat Đnce Đzmir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

42 Nuran Yılmaz Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

43 Ömer Albayrak Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry

44 Ömer Döndüren Izmir Bird Paradise Conservation and Development Union

45 Önder Cırık Kuzeydoğa Association

46 Özden Sağlam Samsun Nature Protection Association

47 Ramazan Aksoy Governorship of Samsun

48 Savaş Yılmaz The Faculty of Science of Ondokuzmayıs University

49 Selman Çubukoğlu Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works

50 Sema Arıman Samsun Province Special Provincial Administration

51 Senem Üstün Kurnaz Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works

52 Serhan Çağırankaya Wetlands Division, Ministry of Environment and Forestry

53 Süreyya Özdemir Environmental Protection Agency for Special Areas, Ministry of Environment and Forestry

54 Sezgin Üçüncü The Head of the Administrative District of Alaçam

55 Şevket Ağmaz Kayseri Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry

56 Yekta Özkan Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Attachment -6 Finance Report

Doğa Derneği Effective Management of Ramsar Sites in Turkey

02/04/2009 – 02/04/2010

DOCUMENT

HISTORY

DOCUMENT

NUMBER EXPLANATION

TL

AMOUNT

CHF

AMOUNT*

1. SALARIES / WAGES / CONSULTANCY COSTS

1.1 Supervisory Staff

30.04.2009 ÖZGE BALKIZ APRİL 2.814,95 2365,50

31.05.2009 ÖZGE BALKIZ MAY 2.918,28 2452,34

30.06.2009 ÖZGE BALKIZ JUNE 2.992,45 2514,66

1.1 Supervisory Staff Total 8725,68 7332,50

1.2 Consultants / Experts

28.10.2009 84 NESLİHAN ÖZGÜNEŞ 1.300,00 1092,44

1.2 Consultants / Experts Total 1300,00 1092,44

1.3 Office Staff

1.3 Office Staff Total 0,00 0,00

1. SALARIES / WAGES / CONSULTANCY COSTS TOTAL 10025,68 8424,94

2. TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS

2.1 Air fares

26.06.2009 14517 ELİT TURİZM 183,00 153,78

25.07.2009 14609 ELİT TURİZM 129,00 108,40

25.07.2009 14610 ELİT TURİZM 129,00 108,40

12.01.2010 885524 ANADOLU JET 59,00 49,58

2.1 Air fares Total 500,00 420,17

2.2 Other travel costs

02.04.2009 35580 VARAN TURİZM 38,00 31,93

02.04.2009 227530 MEHMET KARAKAYA 13,00 10,92

14.04.2009 126157 TURGUT ÜLKER 20,00 16,81

18.04.2009 337362 VARAN TURİZM 38,00 31,93

26.04.2009 35580 MURAT TAMAR 20,00 16,81

28.04.2009 44525 AYHAN KOÇAL 20,00 16,81

17.05.2009 167570 HAVAŞ 7,00 5,88

17.05.2009 166918 HAVAŞ 7,00 5,88

18.05.2009 627317 EKREM TANCAN 35,00 29,41

14.07.2009 352453291570 ANADOLU JET 89,00 74,79

21.07.2009 171555 EFENDİ EŞİYOK 15,00 12,61

22.07.2009 227791 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

23.07.2009 59737 VARAN TURİZM 67,00 56,30

24.07.2009 611855 AYŞE ŞAŞAL 10,00 8,40

25.07.2009 14614 ELİT TURİZM 149,00 125,21

25.07.2009 14613 ELİT TURİZM 263,00 221,01

25.07.2009 14611 ELİT TURİZM 263,00 221,01

02.08.2009 274574 KAMİL KOÇ TURİZM SEYAHAT 45,00 37,82

10.09.2009 418493 EMİR ABDULLAH GÖKDEMİR 18,00 15,13

26.10.2009 459875 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

08.11.2009 679428 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

08.11.2009 679429 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

08.11.2009 169326 SEMA SILBIYIK 40,00 33,61

09.11.2009 684151 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

09.11.2009 2 BAHTAŞ BURDUR AKARYAKIT 135,02 113,46

11.11.2009 535 İZELMAN OTOPARK 4,50 3,78

11.11.2009 9 ABAŞ PROJE İNŞ VE PETROL 105,02 88,25

13.11.2009 12 ÖZDEMİRLER PETROL 68,99 57,97

14.11.2009 35 BEĞENDİK 4,00 3,36

14.11.2009 7 YAY PETROL TE.TİC.SAN.LTD 99,04 83,23

19.11.2009 67 ŞEKER SHELL 35,00 29,41

05.01.2010 718977 HAVAŞ 7,50 6,30

05.01.2010 82317 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

05.01.2010 817242 ANADOLU JET 59,00 49,58

05.01.2010 352129 SÜLEYMAN KATAR 50,00 42,02

08.01.2010 968012 VARAN TURİZM SEYAHAT 37,00 31,09

08.01.2010 351733 RAMAZAN YÜKSEL 30,00 25,21

10.01.2010 752024 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

10.01.2010 752025 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

10.01.2010 752022 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

10.01.2010 752023 KAMİL KOÇ 30,00 25,21

10.01.2010 303245 HARUN ÖCAL 20,00 16,81

10.01.2010 25334 YÜKSEL KALENDER 20,00 16,81

11.01.2010 269339 ALİ ŞENAY 10,00 8,40

11.01.2010 3 BAHTAŞ 120,01 100,85

11.01.2010 2 ŞEVKET ÖZMEN PET.NK.GD. 114,99 96,63

12.01.2010 99251 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

12.01.2010 97625 SÜHA ŞEHİRLERARASI OTOBÜS 21,00 17,65

12.01.2010 328685 AŞIR AKDENİZ 15,00 12,61

12.01.2010 16 POYRAZ PETROL 100,00 84,03

14.01.2010 5018 K.G.M 2,00 1,68

14.01.2010 4027 K.G.M 2,00 1,68

14.01.2010 28 TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC 110,00 92,44

15.01.2010 20 TŞOF TRAFİK ARAÇ VE GEREÇ 128,01 107,57

18.01.2010 72 ŞEKER SHELL 91,50 76,89

19.01.2010 21276 FAİK ARSLAN 16,50 13,87

19.01.2010 646218 RECEP KANDEMİR 15,00 12,61

25.01.2010 410885 MEHMET ÖZTÜRK 15,00 12,61

25.01.2010 194470 ABDURAHMAN KATAR 15,00 12,61

25.01.2010 992198 HASAN SÖZCÜ 17,00 14,29

31.01.2010 114421 LÜKS ANI TUR 413,00 347,06

01.02.2010 171557 İSA ÇATALKAYA 9,50 7,98

01.02.2010 17434 DURAN YARIZ 100,00 84,03

02.02.2010 31470 ÖZKAYMAK 25,00 21,01

02.02.2010 337306 AHMET DEMİRTAŞ 50,00 42,02

02.02.2010 337304 AHMET DEMİRTAŞ 50,00 42,02

02.02.2010 337305 AHMET DEMİRTAŞ 50,00 42,02

02.02.2010 558441 BİROL TÜRK 60,00 50,42

02.02.2010 335114 AYHAN BÜLBÜL 45,00 37,82

02.02.2010 190224 ÖMER ARI 15,00 12,61

03.02.2010 356501 METRO TURİZM 50,00 42,02

03.02.2010 27782 METRO TURİZM 50,00 42,02

03.02.2010 4183 VARAN 37,00 31,09

03.02.2010 128337 KONSET 48,00 40,34

03.02.2010 387243 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 387242 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 387241 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 4018 VARAN TURİZM 65,00 54,62

03.02.2010 338509 MURAT KOÇ 45,00 37,82

03.02.2010 338508 MURAT KOÇ 45,00 37,82

03.02.2010 194216 DURALI DEMİR 40,00 33,61

03.02.2010 370568 AHMET ERDEN 13,00 10,92

04.02.2010 4334 BEYŞEHİR SEYAHAT 8,00 6,72

04.02.2010 244178 İBRAHİM KOYUNCU 95,00 79,83

15.02.2010 318384 YENER ÇETİN 12,00 10,08

16.02.2010 130411 ARİF BARUĞ 20,00 16,81

20.03.2010 921556 ANADOLU DOĞA TURİZM 106,50 89,50

20.03.2010 339 OSKA PETROL 39,34 33,06

2.2 Other travel costs Total 4396,42 3694,47

2.3 Accommodation

18.05.2009 160735 ANADOLU EVLERİ 110,00 92,44

23.07.2009 303577 İZMİR KARŞIYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ 197,00 165,55

23.07.2009 303578 İZMİR KARŞIYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ 210,00 176,47

11.11.2009 116376 TARIM VE KÖYİŞLERİ BAK. 150,00 126,05

13.11.2009 45164 KARACABEY ÖĞRETMENEVİ 80,00 67,23

14.11.2009 70872 İNEGÖL ÖĞRETMENEVİ 67,00 56,30

11.01.2010 79169 ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ TALAS 120,00 100,84

13.01.2010 19969 TAKAV 140,00 117,65

15.01.2010 371565 GÖKSU OTEL 150,00 126,05

15.01.2010 15620 ÖZTUR OTEL 90,00 75,63

20.03.2010 921557 ANADOLU DOĞA TURİZM 74,49 62,60

31.03.2010 921558 ANADOLU DOĞA TURİZM 3.800,00 3193,28

2.3 Accommodation Total 5188,49 4360,08

2.4 Meals

19.04.2009 28 AKYÜZ 6,90 5,80

20.04.2009 11 SAADET DÖNER 9,25 7,77

21.04.2009 7319 TATCAN KURUYEMİŞ 30,00 25,21

21.04.2009 7318 TATCAN KURUYEMİŞ 35,00 29,41

22.04.2009 421 AKYÜZ 20,14 16,92

23.04.2009 108 AKYÜZ 7,97 6,70

24.04.2009 98 OMKAN İKT.İŞL. 3,15 2,65

25.04.2009 36 AKYÜZ 5,76 4,84

26.04.2009 10 ÇEŞNİ TURŞU 3,00 2,52

29.04.2009 149 LİMAN BÜFE 5,00 4,20

29.04.2009 7 TEYZENİN YERİ 12,50 10,50

22.07.2009 33 KYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ 3,00 2,52

22.07.2009 7 KADRİYE USLU 20,00 16,81

22.07.2009 34 KYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ 3,00 2,52

22.07.2009 12 LEVTUR TUR. 160,00 134,45

22.07.2009 982834 AYDIN KARA 200,00 168,07

23.07.2009 200 LOKAL GIDA 54,50 45,80

23.07.2009 201 LOKAL GIDA 22,25 18,70

23.07.2009 17 DEDE BİLİŞİM TURİZM 16,00 13,45

23.07.2009 196 LOKAL GIDA 25,00 21,01

23.07.2009 140 EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 11,20 9,41

23.07.2009 61 KYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ 4,00 3,36

24.07.2009 6 LOKANTA MEHMET NACİ 23,00 19,33

03.09.2009 150 OSKA PETROL ÜRÜN İNS.TAAH. 25,00 21,01

16.09.2009 4 PİDECİ 32,50 27,31

16.09.2009 26 LİVA PASTANESİ 18,94 15,92

08.11.2009 11 HAZAL GIDA TİC.LTD ŞTİ 6,00 5,04

09.11.2009 14 ÖZSARI TOP VE PAR GIDA SAN. 72,00 60,50

09.11.2009 164 MİGROS TİCARET A.Ş 34,32 28,84

10.11.2009 128 BARINAK CAFE 114,50 96,22

10.11.2009 677461 ÖMER USTANIN YERİ 35,00 29,41

11.11.2009 1 KAYA RESTORAN 5,00 4,20

11.11.2009 15 ADEM USTA GIDA.PAZ.SAN 40,00 33,61

11.11.2009 6 OSMAN ERŞEN ÇAY OCAĞI İŞL 5,00 4,20

11.11.2009 5 OSMAN ERŞEN ÇAY OCAĞI İŞL 5,00 4,20

11.11.2009 51 FOTOCAN GIDA İŞL 56,50 47,48

11.11.2009 4 KAYA RESTORAN 5,00 4,20

12.11.2009 645 BEYAZ FIRIN GIDA MAĞZACILIK 8,75 7,35

12.11.2009 636 BEYAZ FIRIN GIDA MAĞZACILIK 7,05 5,92

12.11.2009 6 CANCAN MARKET 2,50 2,10

12.11.2009 10 MEYDAN LOKANTASI 27,00 22,69

13.11.2009 21 BESLER İNEGÖL KÖFTECİSİ 55,00 46,22

13.11.2009 1 PEHLİVAN CAFE RESTORAN 43,00 36,13

14.11.2009 1 MESUT DONDURMA 13,00 10,92

05.01.2010 11 BURGER KİNG 14,25 11,97

05.01.2010 38 HASAN TAYİNCİOĞLI 19,50 16,39

06.01.2010 74 MADO 23,50 19,75

06.01.2010 6 SEVGİ CAFE 6,00 5,04

06.01.2010 3 ELİT UNLU GIDA 6,00 5,04

06.01.2010 574 SİMİT CENTER 3,00 2,52

06.01.2010 18 MADO 25,00 21,01

06.01.2010 73 MADO 25,50 21,43

07.01.2010 7 EYLENSEL RESTAURANT 45,00 37,82

08.01.2010 8 PATRON CAFE CAY 15,00 12,61

08.01.2010 3 YÖREM PİDE LAHMACUN 40,00 33,61

08.01.2010 2 YÖREM PİDE LAHMACUN 40,00 33,61

11.01.2010 2 ŞEVKET ÖZMEN PET.NK.GD. 25,00 21,01

11.01.2010 23 KAŞIKLA MANTI RESTAURANT 74,25 62,39

11.01.2010 2 KATE GIDA VE UNLU 30,00 25,21

11.01.2010 1 S.S.TARIMSAL KALKINMA KOOP 10,00 8,40

12.01.2010 10 HELVACI PETROL 70,00 58,82

12.01.2010 13 ÖZTÜRKLER ET LOKANTASI 50,00 42,02

12.01.2010 2 ÇAVDARLAR PETROL SAN. 5,00 4,20

12.01.2010 3 ÇAVDARLAR PETROL SAN. 11,00 9,24

12.01.2010 4 ÇAVDARLAR PETROL SAN. 9,00 7,56

12.01.2010 53 METROL İKRAM PAZARLAMA 13,50 11,34

13.01.2010 10 PAŞAM MARKET 18,50 15,55

13.01.2010 11 PAŞAM MARKET 1,85 1,55

13.01.2010 1 ZEYTİNALTI RESTAURANT 15,00 12,61

13.01.2010 19 BABANIN YERİ 50,00 42,02

14.01.2010 10 GÖZDE GIDA ÜRÜN İMALAT 120,00 100,84

14.01.2010 3 GÖKSEL 1 GID.İLET. 40,00 33,61

14.01.2010 5 GÖKSEL 1 GID.İLET. 20,00 16,81

14.01.2010 108 TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC 1,00 0,84

14.01.2010 107 TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC 3,50 2,94

14.01.2010 4 GÖKSEL 1 GID.İLET. 40,00 33,61

15.01.2010 17 EYLENSEL RESTAURANT 41,00 34,45

31.03.2010 921559 ANADOLU DOĞA TURİZM 2.800,00 2352,94

2.4 Meals Total 5003,03 4204,23

2. TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS 15087,94 12678,94

3. RAMSAR SECRETARIAT PROJECT VISIT: TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS

3.1 Air fares

26.01.2010 110887 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 143,00 120,17

3.1 Air fares Total 143,00 120,17

3.2 Other travel costs

01.02.2010 366567 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

01.02.2010 366359 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

01.02.2010 303257 HARUN ÖCAL 15,00 12,61

03.02.2010 337067 ALİ RIZA ÇAĞLAR 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 200527 SAMİYE YAMAN 16,00 13,45

04.02.2010 8 YETO YEŞİL ENERJİ TEKNOLOJİ 56,54 47,51

3.2 Other travel costs Total 117,54 98,77

3.3 Accommodation & meals

03.02.2010 23630 TEPE OTEL 500,00 420,17

04.02.2010 17214 ELİT PALAS 118,00 99,16

3.3 Accommodation & meals Total 618,00 519,33

3. RAMSAR SECRETARIAT PROJECT VISIT: TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION

COSTS TOTAL 878,54 738,27

4. EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE, HIRE & RUNNING COSTS

4.1 Hiring vehicles

22.07.2009 17846 ZEPLİN TURİZM 450,00 378,15

06.10.2009 25 FİLİZ OTOMOTİV 25,00 21,01

22.04.2009 13 ŞEFEK PETROL 25,04 21,04

4.1 Hiring vehicles Total 500,04 420,20

4.2 Fuel & maintenance

10.04.2009 93 CEM PETROL 20,00 16,81

21.04.2009 163777 UZUN PETROL 100,04 84,07

22.07.2009 7 ÖLMEZ KARDEŞLER 190,03 159,69

4.2 Fuel & maintenance Total 310,07 260,56

4. EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE, HIRE & RUNNING COSTS TOTAL 810,11 680,76

5. OFFICE RUNNING COSTS (of DD Ankara central office)

5.1 Computer costs

0,00

0,00

5.1 Computer costs Total 0,00 0,00

5.2 Telephone & fax

30.04.2009 29 KEFELİ İNŞAAT 18,00 15,13

19.07.2009 42 CANTEL İLET. 28,00 23,53

07.08.2009 8 TEKİN İLETİŞİM 44,00 36,97

18.11.2009 11 AS İLETİŞİM 30,00 25,21

24.03.2010 944606 TÜRK TELEKOM 148,22 124,55

25.03.2010 23 CARREFOUR EXPRES 308,00 258,82

28.04.2010 816352 TÜRK TELEKOM 21,61 18,16

5.2 Telephone & fax Total 597,83 502,38

5.3 Photocopies

04.02.2010 11190 PASAJ KIRTASİYE 162,25 136,34

22.03.2010 11251 PASAL KIRTASİYE 315,00 264,71

5.3 Photocopies Total 477,25 401,05

5.4 Office supplies

19.04.2009 6 YENİ ÇARŞI 6,00 5,04

20.04.2009 3 YURTSEVER COLOR 6,00 5,04

20.04.2009 10 YENİ ÇARŞI 10,00 8,40

21.04.2009 5 YENİ ÇARŞI 3,00 2,52

22.04.2009 1 BAHAR TİCARET 2,00 1,68

01.12.2009 11064 PASAJ KIRTASİYE 256,06 215,18

31.03.2010 11 TEKNOSA İÇ VE DIŞ TİC. 59,90 50,34

5.4 Office supplies Total 342,96 288,20

5.5 Other (please specify): Office rent

5.5 Other (please specify): Office rent 0,00 0,00

5. OFFICE RUNNING COSTS (of DD Ankara central office) TOTAL 1418,04 1191,63

6. COST OF PUBLICATIONS, VIDEOS/DVDs, CDs etc.

6.1 Preparation

27.03.2010 81686 EMRE OFSET 4.000,00 3361,34

6.1 Preparation Total 4000,00 3361,34

6.2 Printing / reproduction

27.03.2010 81687 EMRE OFSET 8.000,40 6723,03

6.2 Printing / reproduction Total 8000,40 6723,03

6.3 Distribution (postage)

28.10.2009 192024 ARAS KARGO 26,63 22,38

11.03.2010 817766 ARAS KARGO 47,99 40,33

11.03.2010 817752 ARAS KARGO 8,26 6,94

17.03.2010 845568 YURTİÇİ KARGO 7,27 6,11

18.03.2010 276685 YURTİÇİ KARGO 6,68 5,61

18.03.2010 276830 YURTİÇİ KARGO 8,07 6,78

18.03.2010 818108 ARAS KARGO 21,18 17,80

24.03.2010 1058050467 PTT KARGO 3,00 2,52

25.03.2010 24793 YURTİÇİ KARGO 6,68 5,61

26.03.2010 818465 ARAS KARGO 4,13 3,47

31.03.2010 139308 PTT 800,00 672,27

31.03.2010 461751 PTT 5,05 4,24

6.3 Distribution (postage) Total 944,94 794,07

6. COST OF PUBLICATIONS, VIDEOS/DVDs, CDs etc.TOTAL 12945,34 10878,44

7. COST OF WORKSHOP(S)/ TRAINING COURSE(S)

7.1 Air fares

05.01.2010 817241 ANADOLU JET 59,00 49,58

21.01.2010 293085 PEGASUS HAVAYOLLARI 138,99 116,80

26.01.2010 610346 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 59,00 49,58

26.01.2010 610345 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 59,00 49,58

26.01.2010 610878 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 143,00 120,17

26.01.2010 610880 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 143,00 120,17

26.01.2010 610879 TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI 143,00 120,17

7.1 Air fares Total 744,99 626,04

7.2 Transportation

29.01.2010 643230 ŞANAL KIRŞEHİR 13,00 10,92

30.01.2010 322845 NİLÜFER TURİZM 35,00 29,41

31.01.2010 142568 NEVŞEHİRLİLER TURİZM 35,00 29,41

31.01.2010 12727 VARAN TURİZM 37,00 31,09

31.01.2010 12728 VARAN TURİZM 37,00 31,09

31.01.2010 12729 VARAN TURİZM 37,00 31,09

31.01.2010 142859 METRO TURİZM 50,00 42,02

01.02.2010 114702 DOĞA KARADENİZ 25,00 21,01

01.02.2010 544836 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 37,00 31,09

01.02.2010 544835 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 37,00 31,09

01.02.2010 23835 BAFRA AYDOĞAN TURİZM 50,00 42,02

01.02.2010 443443 LÜKS ARTVİN 45,00 37,82

01.02.2010 146456 HAVAŞ 8,00 6,72

01.02.2010 202469 METRO TURİZM 55,00 46,22

01.02.2010 250131 LİDER TURİZM 50,00 42,02

01.02.2010 93958 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 60,00 50,42

01.02.2010 273814 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 41,00 34,45

01.02.2010 265576 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 41,00 34,45

01.02.2010 104150 METRO TURİZM 30,00 25,21

01.02.2010 871952 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 50,00 42,02

01.02.2010 923469 HAS TURİZM SEYAHAT 55,00 46,22

01.02.2010 104127 METRO TURİZM 30,00 25,21

02.02.2010 230267 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 38,00 31,93

02.02.2010 129805 BAFRA AYDOĞAN TURİZM 60,00 50,42

03.02.2010 3 CİLBOĞLU ŞEKERLEME 50,00 42,02

03.02.2010 132014 BAFRA AYDOĞAN TURİZM 50,00 42,02

03.02.2010 273816 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 37,00 31,09

03.02.2010 280959 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 51,00 42,86

03.02.2010 440281 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 31,00 26,05

03.02.2010 871953 ULUSOY TİCARET TUR. 43,00 36,13

03.02.2010 387270 HAVAŞ 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 26825 METRO TURİZM 50,00 42,02

03.02.2010 99880 LİDER TURİZM 30,00 25,21

03.02.2010 26826 METRO TURİZM 40,00 33,61

04.02.2010 418090 KAMİL KOÇ 40,00 33,61

06.02.2010 26124 METRO TURİZM 40,00 33,61

16.02.2010 25 ARGOLD KUY.TEL. 31,00 26,05

7.2 Transportation Total 1459,00 1226,05

7.3 Per diems

01.02.2010 98 G.J. COFFEE 27,50 23,11

03.02.2010 165 AKYOL GIDA TURİZM 10,00 8,40

03.02.2010 19 AKYOL GIDA TURİZM 14,00 11,76

03.02.2010 176 AKYOL GIDA TURİZM 15,00 12,61

03.02.2010 179 AKYOL GIDA TURİZM 32,00 26,89

03.02.2010 53076 FATOŞUN YERİ 1.080,00 907,56

03.02.2010 23629 TEPE OTEL 3.030,40 2546,55

7.3 Per diems Total 4208,90 3536,89

7.4 Rental of Facilities

03.02.2010 23628 TEPE OTEL 750,00 630,25

7.4 Rental of Facilities Total 750,00 630,25

7. COST OF WORKSHOP(S)/ TRAINING COURSE(S) TOTAL 7162,89 6019,24

GRAND TOTAL 48328,54 40612,22

* The exchange rate is taken as 1,19 TL following the rate applied in the project application.