Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | eid-elsayed |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 1/8
International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416
Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn
alloys on copper substrates
F. Gneccoa, E. Riccia, S. Amorea,b, D. Giurannoa, G. Borzoneb, G. Zanicchib,R. Novakovica,
aNational Research Council (CNR)—Institute for Energetics and Interphases (IENI), Via De Marini, 6–16149-Genoa, ItalybDCCI-University of Genoa, Via Dodecaneso, 31–16146-Genoa (Italy) and Genoa Research Unit of National Consortium of Materials Science & Technology
(INSTM), Italy
Available online 23 October 2006
Abstract
The main objective of this work is to determine the wetting behaviour of lead-free solders on copper substrates in view of their
applications in electronic industry. The wetting behaviour of X–In–Sn (X ¼ Au, Bi) ternary molten alloys in contact with copper has
been studied and compared with the corresponding behaviour of their binary subsystems with a particular attention to the In–Sn/Cu
system. The contact angle measurements on Cu-plates were performed by using a sessile drop apparatus. The solder/copper interface was
characterised by the SEM-EDS analysis.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Interfaces; Metals; Contact angles; Lead-free solder alloys
1. Introduction
The solder process is determined by the physico-chemical
properties of the liquid solder/solid substrate system and
by the environmental conditions over which the solder
process is carried out. For this reason, a complete
characterisation of the surface properties (surface tension,
surface segregation) [1] as well as of the wetting behaviour
has to be done. The wetting properties of a solder/substrate
system are usually characterised by the contact angle, y, of
the liquid metal drop formed on the solid substrate.
Another important parameter of a liquid metal/solid
substrate system is the adhesion strength, generallyrepresented by the work of adhesion, W A [2]. The joint
reliability is related to the wettability of the surfaces to be
joined and subsequently, the ability of the joint to retain its
performance. However, in practice the wettability of filler
alloys is often overlooked or ignored by the producers. The
formation of a thin intermetallic compound layer is
desirable to achieve a good metallurgical bond [3–5].
Soft soldering has been adapted to microchip packingand high-level system assembly [4]. Up to now, the tin–lead
solders have a combination of properties superior to those
attained with any other alloy system, and their unique
physical, mechanical and electrical properties have made
these solders attractive for joining at low temperatures [4].
The Pb–Sn phase diagram shows the existence of a simple
eutectic indicating a tendency towards phase separation.
The melting temperature of the eutectic composition
Pb–73.9 at%Sn is 456 K [6]. Due to a shallow eutectic,
small variations in the solder composition change the
liquidus temperature slightly. The interface reactions
between the solder and the substrate (Cu, Ni, Fe) aredominated by the Sn-component. During soldering, the
Pb–Sn solder alloys react with the substrate to form
intermetallic compounds at the interface. An excessively
thick intermetallic layer can be a source of mechanical
weakness in the soldered joints due to the thermal
expansion coefficient and elastic modulus mismatch as
well as the brittle nature of intermetallic compounds [3,7].
It has been experimentally determined and subsequently
theoretically confirmed that at the interface between Sn-
based solders (Sn–Pb, Sn–Bi, Sn–Ag) and Cu-substrate the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijadhadh
0143-7496/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.008
Corresponding author. Tel.: +39010 6475724; fax: +39 010 6475700.
E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Novakovic).
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 2/8
two intermetallic compounds, Z-Cu6Sn5 (adjacent to
solder) and e-Cu3Sn (adjacent to Cu), are formed [4,8,9].
Lee et al. [9] calculated the nucleation activation energies of
these two compounds at soldering temperatures. When
compared, the Z-Cu6Sn5 resulted energetically favoured.
Depending on the kinetics of growth for a particular solder
alloy/substrate system as well as on the operative condi-tions, both intermetallic phases grow in the solid state
during ageing at lower temperatures up to a significant
thickness (420mm).
The presence of Pb in the Pb–Sn solders affects neither
the formation of the Cu–Sn intermetallic compounds nor
the solid-state growth kinetics of these intermetallics.
However, it has been established that Pb affects many of
the desired properties in the Pb–Sn solders. Indeed Pb
improves the corrosion resistance by the formation of a
tenacious oxide skin on the Pb-rich phase of the Pb–Sn
eutectic, prevents the ‘‘tin-pest’’ phenomenon, i.e., the b-Sn
to a-Sn transition upon cooling at T ¼ 286K, and lowers
the surface tension of solders with respect to the pure Sn
increasing consequently the wettability of the substrate
[3,4].
In view of environmental and health concerns, the lead-
free solders have only recently become a common subject
for fundamental research. Alternative solder alloys do not
meet completely environmental regulations and require-
ments for the reliability of corresponding properties. The
candidate alloys involve Sn as the base element, Ag, Bi, Cu
and Zn as the major alloying elements and some minor
additions such as In and Sb [4,8–14]. In the framework of
the Action COST 531 project some alloys of the Bi–In–Sn
and Au–In–Sn systems have been proposed as candidatesfor a lead-free solder in modern electronic. There are many
literature data on the thermodynamic properties [16], few
data on the surface properties of the Bi–In–Sn system and
its subsystems [17], while on the wetting properties as well
as the joining of both, the Bi–In–Sn and Au–In–Sn systems
on Cu-substrate a complete lack of data was observed.
Joining studies have been done for different compositions
and temperatures, so that it is difficult to find experimental
data obtained under comparable conditions [12,15,18]. In
the present work, the sessile drop method was used to
determine the contact angle of some binary and ternary
liquid alloys of X–In–Sn (X ¼ Au, Bi) in contact with Cu-
substrate.
2. Experimental
The contact angle measurements were performed on
some binary and ternary systems (Table 1) from the
melting point up to 768 K. The alloy specimens were
prepared by mixing high purity metals (99.9999% Marz-
grade) for each nominal composition, pre-melted in a
vitreous carbon crucible under a vacuum of P ¼ 102 Pa at
a temperature about 100 K above the melting point. The
final alloy composition was controlled by the SEM-EDS
analysis. The measurements were performed in a horizontal
furnace heated by an 800 kHz high-frequency generator
coupled to a graphite heater and thermal shields. Metallic
drops of about 1.0 g were mechanically cleaned by
scratching, and then chemically rinsed with pure ethanol
in an ultrasonic bath. The sample was introduced at the
centre of the chamber, placed on a high purity copper
(99.9999%) substrate (plate + ¼ 10 mm), metallographi-
cally mirror polished. Before the test, the furnace was
heated and degassed under vacuum (P ¼ 104 Pa), then
pure Argon (ArN60) was introduced. The resulting oxygen
pressure, P O2, was around an average value 106 Pa. The
temperature, monitored by a K-thermocouple placed just
below the specimen, was kept constant within 72 K.
Resting on a perfectly levelled substrate, the sample was
illuminated by an aligned light source and its image wascaptured by a CCD camera connected to a PC. A specific
image analysis software, ASTRAviews [19,20] with fast
automatic acquisition (0.5 s) was applied which allows the
contact angle values to be calculated in real time with an
accuracy of about 1%. Contact angles have been measured
in a temperature range from above the liquidus tempera-
ture up to a final value, defined for each specific system, at
which the isothermal conditions were reached. DSC
measurements have been done on the ternary alloys. A
differential scanning calorimeter designed as a Calvet
calorimeter (DSC 111, Setaram), has been used for the
determination of the solid–liquid transition temperatures.
The specimens (about 700 mg) were enclosed in a tight-
sealed tantalum crucible. The calibration of the apparatus
was performed with measurements of the temperature of
pure metallic In, Sn, Pb and Zn elements. Temperatures
were measured at 70.5 K. The DSC analyses were
performed in continuous heating mode at a rate of 1, 3
and 5 K/min. Generally, a series of different runs in various
temperature ranges were made and, in order to verify
consistency, each run was repeated three times. More
details on the working conditions may be found in [21].
The metallographic examinations of the alloy–substrate
interface were accomplished by optical microscopy, SEM
and EDS.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
Selected alloys as candidates for lead-free solders
Alloy composition (at%) T l (K) y0 (1) T f (K) yf (1) tf (s)
In–70Sn 450 142 708 41 680
In–85Sn 485 165 690 23 400
Au–55In 768 162 852 50 640
Au–97In 588 160 760 21 550
Au–82Sn 582 143 695 34 300
Au–5In–81Sn 538 128 645 33 600
Au–11In–84Sn 493 117 600 52 600
Au–8In–88Sn 503 127 602 39 550
Bi–52In 383 160 623 51 550
Bi–80In 355 122 648 44 700
Bi–5In–81Sn 483 92 608 39 620
Bi–8In–88Sn 430 66 608 30 600
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 410
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 3/8
3. Results and discussion
The selected binary and ternary compositions of the
X–In–Sn (X ¼ Au, Bi) alloys are shown in Fig. 1(a) and
(b), respectively. The alloy compositions, the initial contact
angles (y0), the final temperatures (T f ), times (tf ) and the
contact angles (yf ) are reported in Table 1. The liquidus
temperatures (T l) refer to the corresponding binary phase
diagrams [6] or, in the case of ternary systems, the values
obtained by DSC [21].
The wetting behaviour of ternary molten alloys in
contact with Cu-substrate has been studied together with
the corresponding behaviour of their binary subsystems
with a particular attention to the In–Sn/Cu system and the
effect of a third component, Au or Bi, on it. Once the
wetting experiments were completed and characteristic
parameters mentioned above (Table 1) were determined,the samples were cooled for about 600 s, and then prepared
for the microstructural characterisation with the aim to
study the reactivity of the systems investigated. A summary
of the results of the characterisation of each alloy tested is
reported in Table 2.
3.1. In–Sn system
In the In–Sn system, the eutectic is formed at inter-
mediate composition, In–48.3 at%Sn at 393 K. Some
information on the In–50Sn solder in contact with copper
substrate is reported in [4,10,18]. The effect of solder-bath
temperature on the performance of In–50Sn alloy has been
studied by [4] at temperatures well above the alloy’s
liquidus. Poor wettability was observed at temperatures
close to T ¼ 488 K, while at higher temperatures an
improvement was observed. Therefore, according to these
tests an increase in the solder temperature is a first
promising approach to improve the solderability. Accord-
ing to [10], the In–Sn solders wet Cu by forming Sn–In–Cu
intermetallics. The interfacial microstructure is affected by
the high solubility of Cu in In–50Sn liquid alloy and by the
participation of In in the intermetallic layer at the solder/
Cu interface, exhibiting two layers consisted of Cu2(Sn,In)
and Cu2In3Sn intermetallics, with the In-rich Cu2In3Snphase on the solder side of the interface.
In this work, two In–Sn alloys were investigated:
In–70Sn: The variations of contact angle and tempera-
ture as function of time for the In–70Sn are shown in Fig.
2. The initial contact angle (the mean value of the left and
right contact angles which differo4%) is close to 1401 at
T ¼ 573 K. y starts to decrease after 2 s, and reaches a
constant value yf ¼ 411 at T f ¼ 708 K in 680 s. After
cooling the sample was metallografically prepared in order
to characterise the interface cross section obtained by the
SEM and EDS analyses. Close to Cu-substrate a thick
interface layer (60mm) of the Cu–7In–19Sn composition
was identified (Table 2, Fig. 3). In many points adjacent to
the solder alloy the phase Cu–13In–31Sn (light grey spots)
was detected. It is interesting to notice that Cu-contents of
these phases are very close to the well known intermetallics,
e-Cu3Sn and Z-Cu6Sn5, respectively, formed in the case of
the eutectic Pb–Sn/Cu-substrate [4,9]. The remaining
composition, identified as In–74Sn is close to the initial
alloy composition. The changes in composition can be
attributed to the loss of In due to its volatility, as proved by
the spots of In found on the substrate surface near the
drop.
In–85Sn: The initial contact angle was close to 1651 at
T ¼ 523 K. The spreading was observed starting from
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 1. Selected alloy compositions (a) the Au–In–Sn system and (b) the
Bi–In–Sn system.
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 411
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 4/8
590 K and y reached a constant value yf ¼ 231 at
T f ¼ 690 K after 400 s. The EDS analysis has shown the
presence of a thin layer (3 mm) close to Cu-substrate
containing the Cu–11In–12Sn phase.
The results obtained show that with an increase of Sn in
the solder the contact angle decreases together with the
thickness of the interface layer between solder and Cu-
substrate. Accordingly, the wetting behaviour changed
from a dissolutive wetting, characterised by a thick
interface layer to a macroscopically planar, thin layer
formed of Sn-rich alloys. Indeed, in the case of the
In–70Sn, the final contact angle should be considered as
an apparent one due to the evident high reactivity of this
system. The reactivity decreases strongly with an increase
in Sn-content. The value yf ¼ 231 obtained for the alloy
with higher Sn-content can be taken as the real equilibrium
value.
3.2. Au–In and Au–Sn systems
Reactions and characteristics of Au–In microjoints need
to be investigated in detail to establish the suitability of this
system as candidate material for engineering applications
such as microelectronic packing [22]. In order to avoid
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 2
Summary of the results obtained by SEM-EDS characterization of the microstructure of each alloy tested
Initial composition (at%) Interface composition (at%) Layer thickness (mm) T f (K) Bulk-phase compositions (at%)
In–70Sn Cu–7In–19Sn 60 708 Cu–13In–31Sn
In–74Sn
In–85Sn Cu–11In–12Sn 3 690 Cu–21In–23Sn
Au–55In Cu–20In–14Au 40 852 Cu–33In–45Au
Au–97In Cu–22In 40 760 Cu–39In–1Au
Cu–38In 30
Au–82Sn Cu–26Sn–2Au o2 695 Cu–50Sn–23Au
Au–5In–81Sn Cu–2In–22Sn–1Au 6 645 Cu–4In–44Sn–15Au (near interface)
Cu–3In–59Sn–12Au
Au–11 In–84 Sn Cu–4In–20Sn–1Au 22 600 Cu–7In–39Sn–8Au (near interface)
In–17Sn–33Au
Au–8In–88Sn Cu–51In–42Sn–8Au 20 602 Cu–33In–41Sn–23Au (near interface)
Cu–6In–42Sn–8Au
Bi–52In Cu–32In o1 623 In–48Bi (near interface)
In–36Bi
Bi–80In Cu–46In 7 648 Bi–37In
Bi–5In–81Sn Cu–20Sn 5 608 Cu–40Sn (near interface)
In–2Sn–39Bi
Bi–8In–88Sn Cu–9In–38Sn o1 608 Sn–6Bi (near interface)
Cu–8In–38Sn
140
120
100
80
60
40
C o n t a c t A n g l e [ ° ]
7006005004003002001000
Time [s]
700
680
660
640
620
600
580
T e m p e r a
t u r e [ K ]
Fig. 2. Variations of contact angle (o) and temperature (D) as function of time for the In–70Sn (at%) alloy on pure Cu-substrate.
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 412
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 5/8
open circuits during reflow soldering of all components, a
high melting soldering process is required for the bonding
of integrated circuits (IC). A flip-chip bonding with an
Au–Sn metallization system has been successfully intro-
duced for the mounting of IC [23]. Binary gold containing
alloys investigated in this work were:
Au–55In: The variations of contact angle and tempera-ture as function of time for the Au–55SIn are shown in Fig.
4. The initial contact angle is close to 1621 at T ¼ 773 K. y
starts to decrease after 1 s, and reaches a constant value
yf ¼ 501 at T f ¼ 852 K in 640 s. The analyses of the cross
section of this alloy sample showed the formation close to
Cu-substrate of a thick interface layer (40mm) of the
Cu–20In–14Au composition (Table 2, Fig. 5). Cu-content
of this phase is very close to that of the Z-Cu2In
intermetallic compound [6]. The reaction between the
Au–55In alloy and Cu-substrate led to an increase in the
total volume of the liquid phase. According to [2] the
observed wetting behaviour can be classified as dissolutive
wetting as observed in the case of In–70Sn alloy. So, the
contact angle value of 501 observed (Table 1) at the final
temperature T f ¼ 852 K can also be considered as anapparent angle.
Au–97In: In this case, the presence of higher In-content
justifies a decrease in the final contact angle value, yf ¼ 211
at T f ¼ 760 K. A thick interface composed of two layers of
40 and 30 mm was found by EDS. The composition of these
layers was Cu–22In and Cu–38In, respectively.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 3. SEM micrograph of a cross section of the In–70.3Sn (at%) alloy
on pure Cu-substrate.
160
140
120
100
80
60
C o n t a c t A n g l e [ ° ]
7006005004003002001000
Time [s]
800
780
760
740
720
700
T e m p e r a t u r e
[ K ]
Fig. 4. Variations of contact angle (o) and temperature (D) as function of time for the Au–55In (at%) alloy on pure Cu-substrate.
Fig. 5. SEM micrographs of a cross section of the Au–54.9In (at%) alloy
on pure Cu-substrate.
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 413
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 6/8
Au–82Sn: Due to a slight dissolution of Cu, the interface
of this alloy remained macroscopically planar and as a
consequence an equilibrium contact angle value yf ¼ 341
was reached at the temperature of 695 K (Table 1). In
addition, close to Cu-substrate a thin interface layer
(o2mm) of the Cu–26Sn–2Au composition was identified
(Table 2, Fig. 6). In this layer, Cu-content is slightlydifferent from that in the e-Cu3Sn intermetallic compound,
formed in the case of the eutectic Pb–Sn/Cu-substrate [4,9].
Adjacent to the solder the Cu–50Sn–23Au phase was
detected.
3.3. Au–In–Sn system
Three ternary alloys that belong to this system have been
investigated:
Au–5In–81Sn: The mean value of the contact angle of
this ternary alloy at T f ¼ 645 K is yf ¼ 331 (Table 1). As in
the case of the Au–82Sn alloy, the interface examined bySEM seems to be macroscopically planar. Close to Cu-
substrate a thin interface layer (o10mm) of the
Cu–2In–22Sn–1Au composition was identified (Table 2,
Fig. 7). It is interesting to note that, also in this case, the
Cu-content of this phase is close to that of the e-Cu3Sn
intermetallic compound [4,8,9]. In many points near the
interface the Cu–4In–44Sn–15Au, Cu–3In–59Sn–12Au and
Sn–2In phases were found.
Au–11In–84Sn: A constant contact angle value yf ¼ 521
reached after 600 s and at the temperature T f ¼ 600 K was
observed (Table 1). The SEM and EDS analyses revealed
an interface layer
22mm thick of composition75Cu–4In–20Sn–1Au (Table 2).
Au–8In–88Sn: For this alloy, a contact angle value
y ¼ 391 was reached at T f ¼ 602K (Table 1) and a layer
20 mm thick of composition Cu–51In–42Sn–8Au was
identified by EDS (Table 2). The reduction of In and Sn-
content from Au–11In–84Sn and Au–8In–88Sn to
Au–5In–81Sn leads to a sharp reduction in reactivity
despite an increase in T (from 600 to 645 K). Indeed,
among the three alloys considered, the Au–5In–81Sn alloy
having the highest Au-content is characterised by the
formation of 3–4 times thinner interface layer (6mm) in
respect to the Au–11In–84Sn and Au–8In–88Sn alloys.
3.4. Bi–Sn system
In the Bi–Sn system, the constituent phases of the
eutectic are terminal solid solutions, as they are in the
Pb–Sn system. The Bi–Sn solder forms a well-definedeutectic microstructure at all solidification rates. According
to the literature these solders wet Cu by forming Sn-
containing intermetallics that resemble the intermetallics
formed by eutectic Pb–Sn [9]. The microstructure of the
Bi–Sn/Cu interface is similar to that formed at Pb–Sn/Cu
interface. The principal intermetallic compound is the
Cu6Sn5. During ageing in the solid state, the Cu3Sn
intermetallic compound is formed and its growth at the
Cu-interface can be observed [4,10,15].
3.5. Bi–In–Sn system
Two binary and two ternary Bi-containing alloys have
been investigated in this work:
Bi–52In: A contact angle yf ¼ 511 was reached at
T f ¼ 623 K in 550s (Table 1). By EDS analysis a very thin
interface layer (o1mm) with composition of Cu–32In close
to the d-Cu7In3 [6] was identified (Fig. 8). No dissolution of
Cu was observed. This can be explained by a tendency of
the Bi–Cu system to phase separation [6]. Two intermetallic
compounds, the BiIn and BiIn2 were identified in the bulk
alloy indicating the same alloy composition before and
after experiment. The presence of some spots of the Z-
Cu2In phase was also detected by EDS analysis (Table 2).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 6. SEM micrographs of a cross section of the Au–81.8Sn (at%) alloy
on pure Cu-substrate.
Fig. 7. SEM micrograph of a cross section of the 14.3Au–5.2In–80.5Sn
(at%) alloy on pure Cu-substrate.
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 414
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 7/8
Bi–80In: For this In-rich alloy, the mean value of the
equilibrium contact angle reached at T f ¼ 648 K was
yf ¼ 441 (Table 1). A thin interface layer of about 7 mm
having the composition Cu–46In was identified by EDS
(Table 2).
Bi–5In–81Sn: The mean value of the contact angle of this
ternary alloy at T f ¼ 608K is yf ¼ 391 (Table 1). At the
interface the Cu4Sn phase with a thickness of about 5 mm
was formed (Table 2, Fig. 9). It is interesting to notice that
close to this phase some spots of the Cu–40Sn compound
(similar to Zphase) [8,9] were observed. The same
composition was detected in a few points of the solidified
alloy drop.
Bi–8In–88Sn: The mean value of the contact angle of this
ternary alloy at T f ¼ 608 K is yf ¼ 301 (Table 1). Close to
Cu-substrate, a very thin interface layer of the
Cu–9In–38Sn composition was identified by EDS analysis
(Table 2).
Bi-containing alloys in contact with copper substrate
exhibit low reactivity. Generally, the wetting of these alloys
increases and the corresponding contact angle values
decrease with a decrease in Bi, exhibiting the minimum
value, yf ¼ 301
in the case of the Bi–8In–88Sn alloy havingonly 4 at%Bi.
The high melting point of lead-free solders with respect
to the traditional Pb–Sn alloys is usually a weak point in
electronic package. The addition of Au to the In–Sn system
increases the melting point of these binary solders, but
might be useful for some applications at higher tempera-
tures. Gold is widely used in electronic industry as contact
and conductor material. At the interface between Au–Sn
solders and Cu-containing substrates, the brittle AuSn4
phase can be observed [24]. Indium has a much lower
affinity for Au and dissolves Au at a rate 13–14 times
slower than Sn. The addition of In into Sn-based solders
facilitates the AuIn2 formation at the interface and inhibits
the AuSn4 formation. Accordingly, the solubility of Au in
the In–Sn system can be reduced, and an optimised ternary
composition could give a solder with required character-
istics. On the contrary, the addition of Bi to Sn-based
solders can reduce melting temperatures, promotes the
wetting, but according to the present results, only a limited
quantity of Bi (o4 at%) is suggested.
4. Conclusions
The wetting behaviour of a certain number of solder
alloys pertaining to the systems of In–Sn, Au–Sn, Au–In,
Bi–In, Au–In–Sn, and Bi–In–Sn in contact with a Cu-
substrate has been analysed. Their wetting behaviour
changed from a dissolutive wetting, characterised by the
formation of a thick interface layer (In–Sn, Au–In),
through a macroscopically planar, thin layer formation
(In–Sn, Au–Sn, Au–In–Sn) to the formation of an
extremely thin interface layer (Bi–In, Bi–In–Sn) or isolated
spots (Bi–In) as in the case of Bi-containing solders.
Among these systems, the In–Sn solders with high Sn-
content exhibit wetting characteristics very similar to those
of the Pb–Sn system. In the case of Au–In–Sn alloys, an
increase in In-content increases the interface layer thick-
ness, as it is also observed in the In–Sn and Au–In alloys.
On the contrary, the behaviour of Bi–In–Sn alloys in
contact with Cu-substrate is opposite with respect to that
of the In–Sn system. Namely, the higher is the In-content
the thinner the interface layer observed. Accordingly, the
Bi–In–Sn system exhibits the same behaviour as the Bi–In.
In order to improve their wetting characteristics and
consequently the mechanical properties, it is very impor-
tant to optimise the composition and the joining process
parameters to avoid an excessive growth of the interface
reaction layer.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 8. SEM micrograph of a cross section of the Bi–51.5In (at%) alloy on
pure Cu-substrate.
Fig. 9. SEM micrograph of a cross section of the 14.3Bi–5.2In–80.5Sn
(at%) alloy on pure Cu-substrate.
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 415
8/10/2019 Wetting behaviour and reactivity of lead free Au–In–Sn and Bi–In–Sn on Cu substrate.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wetting-behaviour-and-reactivity-of-lead-free-auinsn-and-biinsn 8/8
Acknowledgement
This work was performed in the framework of the E.C.
Action COST 531 project: ‘‘Lead-free solder materials’’.
The authors would like to thank the National Consortium
of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM) for
financial support (PRISMA project). The authors wouldlike to thank Mr. C. Bottino, IENI-CNR, Genoa, for
performing the EDS and SEM analyses.
References
[1] Novakovic R, Ricci E, Gnecco F, Giuranno D, Borzone G. Surf Sci
2005;509:230.
[2] Eustathopoulos N, Nicholas M, Drevet B. Wettability at high
temperatures, vol. 3. Oxford: Pergamon Materials Series; 1999.
[3] Nicholas MG. In: Nicholas MG, editor. Joining processes. Dor-
drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
[4] Vianco PT, Frear DR. JOM 1993;45:14.
[5] Protsenko P, Terlain A, Traskine V, Eustathopoulos N. Scripta
Mater 2001;45:1439.[6] Massalski TB. Binary alloy phase diagrams, vols. 1, 2. Metals Park,
OH: ASM; 1986.
[7] Yoon J-W, Jung S-BJ. J Alloys Compds 2003;359:202.
[8] Ro ¨ nka ¨ KJ, van Loo FJJ, Kivilahti JK. Scripta Mater
1997;37(10):1575.
[9] Lee B-J, Hwang NM, Lee HM. Acta Mater 1997;45(5):1867.
[10] Morris Jr JW, Freer Goldstein JL, Mei Z. JOM 1993;45:25.
[11] Loomans ME, Vaynman S, Ghosh G, Fine ME. J Electron Mater
1994;23(8):741.
[12] Yoon SV, Soh JR, Lee HM, Lee B-J. Acta Mater 1997;45(3):951.[13] Frear DR, Jang JW, Lin JK, Zhang C. JOM 2001;53(6):28.
[14] Islam MN, Chan YC, Rizvi MJ, Jillek W. J Alloys Compds
2005;400:136.
[15] Yoon J-W, Jung S-B. J Alloys Compds 2003;359:202.
[16] Moelans N, Hari Kumar KC, Wollants P. J Alloys Compds
2003;360:98.
[17] Keene BJ. The surface tension of tin and its alloys with particular
reference to solders, DMM(A) 1993;113.
[18] Abtew M, Selvaduray G. Mater Sci Eng 2000;27:95.
[19] Liggieri L, Passerone A. High Tech 1989;7:82.
[20] Viviani M. ICFAM-CNR technical report, CNR Genoa, 1999.
[21] Borzone G, Parodi N, Ferro R, Bros JP, Dube ` s JP, Gambino M. J
Alloys Compds 2001;320:242.
[22] Chang ZC, Lu FH, Shieu FS. Mater Chem Phys 2001;70:137.
[23] Baggerman AFJ, Batenburg MJ. Transactions on components,packing & manufacturing technology, Part B 1995;18(2):257.
[24] Sharif A, Chan YC. J Alloys Compds 2005;393:135.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F. Gnecco et al. / International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 409–416 416