WG 13 OBA spectrum analysis
Ronny Blomme Royal Observatory of Belgium
On behalf of: Y. Frémat, M. Gebran, A. Lobel, J. Maíz Apellániz, R. Monier, T. Morel, I. Negueruela, F. Royer, T. Semaan, S. Simón-Díaz and the Gaia-ESO WG13 team
• Giraffe hot-star gratings
• (UVES 520)
Gratings
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
2
Grating Wavelength range
HR03 4033-4201 HR05A 4340-4587 HR06 4538-4759
HR09B 5143-5356 HR14A 6308-6701
Open clusters processed:
Clusters
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
3
Cluster Age Distance (kpc)
Galactocentric distance (kpc)
Berkeley 81 1 Gyr 3 5.8 NGC 4815 0.5 Gyr 2.5 6.9 NGC 6705 250-300 Myr 1.9 6.1 NGC 3293 10 Myr 2.3 7.7 Trumpler 14 1-3 Myr 2.3 7.6
o ROB_Grid: o ROB (A. Lobel):
• Kurucz, LTE spectrum synthesis, A-stars o Liège (T. Morel, T. Semaan):
• Kurucz (LTE) or Tlusty (NLTE), NLTE spectrum synthesis, B-stars
Nodes
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
4
Grid Teff range Bertone et al. 2004 4,000 – 50,000 K Munari et al. 2005 – new ODF 3,500 – 9,750 K Munari et al. 2005 – old ODF 3,500 – 47,500 K Pollux - Atlas 7,000 – 15,000 K Tlusty B2006 15,000 – 30,000 K Tlusty O2002 27,500 – 55,000 K
Trumpler 14
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
5
Not all grids cover full Teff range
Reject results at boundary of each grid
Bertone grid: problems around 20,000-25,000 K
Trumpler 14
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
6
Plot other vs best result
Good agreement No ROB/Liège results
Trumpler 14
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
7
Other log g vs best one
Only results with a “valid” Teff
Dashed lines: +- 0.5 dex
Trumpler 14
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
8
Other [M/H] vs best Only vaild Teff Dashed lines at +-0.5
dex
NGC 3293
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
9
NGC 3293 Other Teff vs best one Only results with a
“valid” Teff ROB and Liège results
plotted ROB results differ?
NGC 3293
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
10
Zoom-in of previous fig ROB + some Liège results differ Note the 8,000-10,000 K gap
NGC 3293
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
11
Other log g vs best one ROB log g values differ But they are more consistent
with expectations
NGC 3293
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
12
Other [M/H] vs best one ROB values differ But they are more consistent
with expectations
NGC 6705
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
13
NGC 6705 Other Teff vs best one
NGC 6705
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
14
Zoom-in of previous fig ROB results, no Liège results ROB results differ 8,000-10,000 gap
NGC 6705
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
15
Other log g vs best one ROB values differ But they are more consistent
with expectations
NGC 6705
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
16
Other [M/H] vs best one ROB values differ But they are more consistent
with expectations
o Why the ROB vs ROB_grid differences? o ROB determines microturbulence, ROB_grid uses fixed value o ROB determines [Fe/H], ROB_grid [M/H] o ROB does the normalization of the spectrum again, ROB_grid
just applies a minor correction to the normalization
ROB vs ROB_grid
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
17
Fig.: Y. Frémat
Summary
Substantial progress has been made since iDR1, in quality of spectral fitting
Differences between ROB and ROB_grid are worrying Most probably cause is the normalization This is to be explored in the coming weeks
Summary
Arcetri, 12-13 November 2013 The Gaia-ESO Survey: Consolidating the Survey Strategy
18