13
What impact language do you speak? Feb 2020 galvmed.org
What impact language do you speak?
Feb 2020
galvmed.org
2
The GALVmed Impact Pathway: What is Changing?
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
3
Adoption Changes
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
SLIDE 4
Adoption Example 1: Vaccine A
0
20
40
60
80
100
6/1/2015 12/1/2015 6/1/2016 12/1/2016 6/1/2017
Perc
enta
ge o
f hou
seho
lds (
%) Percentage adoption among different segments of
smallholders
Small Medium Large
SLIDE 5
Adoption Example 2: Vaccine B
Area A Area B Area C
Household Survey Adoption Rates
Households adopting Households not adopting
50% 7% 8%
6
Productivity Changes
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
7
Productivity Example: Vaccine A ; Before and After
20
30
0
10
20
30
40
Flock Size
Aver
age
# Bi
rds
Mayurbhanj, India (n = 284)
11
32
0
10
20
30
40
Flock Size
Nepal (n = 107)
11
22
0
10
20
30
Flock Size
Keonjhar, India (n = 176)
19
57
0
20
40
60
80
Flock Size
Aver
age
# Bi
rds
Cameroon (n = 286)
26 29
0
10
20
30
40
Flock Size
Tanzania (n = 250)
34
52
0
20
40
60
80
Flock Size
Burkina Faso (n = 306)50% flock size increase (p value < 0.01) 190% flock size increase (p value < 0.01) 100% flock size increase (p value < 0.01)
200% flock size increase (p value < 0.01) 12% flock size increase (p value > 0.01) 53% flock size increase (p value < 0.01)
Error bars represent 3x Standard Error of the meanp values for overall flock sizes, based on results of 2-tailed t-testBaseline Endline
SLIDE 8
Productivity Example : De-wormers
MEAN WEIGHT GAIN AFTER 56 DAYSTreated: 2.80kg Non-treated: 1.42kg
Significant at p<0.001
n=97
n=129
Closantel
Non-treated Treated
wei
ght g
ain
afte
r 56
Days
(kg)
MEAN WEIGHT GAIN AFTER 56 DAYSTreated: 515g Non-treated: 445.0g
Significant at p<0.001
n=394n=489
Fenbendazole
Non-treated Treated
wei
ght g
ain
afte
r 56
Days
(g)
n = ~500 goatsn = ~2000 Chickens
9
Livelihood Changes
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
10
Livelihood Example: Poultry Income & Education
Source: Uganda ND Productivity Study - 2017
For every bird sold…is typically spent on school
is typically spent on household health
on other sources
From VaccinatingHouseholds
30%
9%
60%
From Non-VaccinatingHouseholds
16%
13%72%
is typically spent on school
is typically spent on household healthon other
sources
n = 621
11
Viability & Sustainability Changes
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
12
16, 53%
14, 47%
Agrovets (N = 30)
Stocking
Not Stocking
41, 77%
12, 23%
Vaccinators (N = 53)
Providing ND Vaccine
Not Providing NDVaccine
(7 in 2012) (98 in 2012)
61%
39% YesNo
n = 245
112.869.6
0
50
100
150
Vaccinating Not vaccinating
Anun
al p
oultr
y In
com
e (U
SD)
Viability and Sustainability Changes: 5 years on
Vaccine Supply Vaccine Usage
13
In Summary …..
$ $ $$ $ $
$ $ $
$
