Date post: | 13-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | iseal-alliance |
View: | 7,342 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Principles for Credible and Effective Sustainability Standards Systems
ISEAL Credibility Principles
What makes a standards system credible?• Proliferation of standards and labels
• Limited impacts evidence
• Standards users need clarity
organicenvironmentally friendly
eco
-fri
en
dly
fair
lynatural
veri
fie
d
faireco
en
erg
yef
fici
en
tla
bo
ur
100%
cert
ifie
d
no
ch
em
ical
s
fre
evalidated ca
rbo
n-n
eu
tral
bio
de
grad
able
pro
venre
cycl
ed
50%more
No
ch
ild la
bo
ur
© Eu
genio
Fernán
dez V
ázqu
ez, Rain
forest A
lliance
What is essential to deliver positive impact?
• Core values applicable to all standards systems
• Embraced by ISEAL members to achieve intended outcomes
DEKRA (USA)
Society Action Group (India)
GIZ (Germany)
Consumers International (UK)
Nordic Swan (Norway)
Retail Council of Canada (Canada)
Forest Stewardship Council (China)
WWF – Market Transformation Initiative (China)
Royal Ahold(USA)
Rural AdvancementFoundationInternational USA (USA)
Amigos da Terra Amazonia Brasileira (Brasil)
Unilever (Netherlands)
Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (UK)
UNEP (Observer)
Applying the Principles
Peruvian Rainforest © Max Bello | Rainforest Alliance
• Shape global discussion
• Drive improvement in standards systems
• Inform sourcing decisions
• Ensure meaningful comparisons
ISEAL Credibility Principles
1. Sustainability
©FSC
• Clearly defined objectives
• Actions and decisions align with sustainability vision
• Structured to deliver outcomes
Cockle Picking © Marine Stewardship Council
2. Improvement
• Demonstrate and improve impact
• Strong monitoring and evaluation systems
• Continual learning
Measuring logs in Peru © David Dudenhoefer, 2011, Rainforest Alliance
3. Relevance
Colombia © David Bonilla for 4C Association
• Most significant sustainability issues in product or sector
• Reflect scientific knowledge and international norms
• Global consistency and local adaptation
4. Rigour
• Requirements lead to measurable progress
• Consistency throughout standards system
• Accurate certification decisions
Photo © Robin Romano, GoodWeave
5. Engagement
• Balanced and representative stakeholders
• Proactive engagement strategies
• Mechanisms to resolve complaints
Field School, Ivory Coast © UTZ Certified
6. Impartiality
• Identify and mitigate all conflicts of interest
• Increased transparency and balanced representation
• Assurance and governance
Fairtrade Gold © Eduardo Martino, Fairtrade International
7. Transparency
• Freely available information about standard and impacts
• Disclose how important decisions are made
• Organised and relevant to enable informed choice
Photo © Robin Romano, GoodWeave
Photo © MSC
8. Accessibility
Cocoa_IvoryCoast_farmerfieldschool05 © UTZ CERTIFIED
• Reduce unnecessary barriers to uptake
• Minimise overly burdensome requirements
• Facilitate access tocapacity building
Baobab tree © David Brazier, Union for Ethical BioTrade
9. Truthfulness
• Claims are verifiable and not misleading
• Use precise language and allow informed choice
• Supported by robust traceability process
Palm oil processing plant © Bremen Yong for RSPO
10. Efficiency
• Collaborate with or reference other credible standards
• Business model ensures long-term financial viability
• Consistent and resilient systems
Photo © Scott Welker for GoodWeave