+ All Categories
Home > Documents > What Went Wrong? - American Institute of Aeronautics … de Havilland DH 106 Comet • Comet 1:...

What Went Wrong? - American Institute of Aeronautics … de Havilland DH 106 Comet • Comet 1:...

Date post: 07-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: tranminh
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
73
What Went Wrong? Why some commercial aircraft programs didn’t live up to expectations AIAA Southern California ASAT Conference April 30, 2016 Tony Hays California State University Long Beach
Transcript

What Went Wrong?Why some commercial aircraft programs

didn’t live up to expectations

AIAA Southern California ASAT

Conference

April 30, 2016

Tony Hays

California State University Long Beach

2

“Those who cannot remember the past

are condemned to repeat it”

– George Santayana

2016-04-28

Selected Programs

• De Havilland Comet

• Lockheed Electra

• Convair 880/990

• De Havilland Trident

• Vickers VC10

• Dassault Mercure

• BAC/Sud Aviation

Concorde

• Lockheed L-1011

• VFW-Fokker 61

32016-04-28

1: de Havilland DH 106 Comet

• Comet 1: First flight July 1949

• Entered service May 1952

• Pax: 36-44 Range: 1,300

nmi.

• Two aircraft broke up in flight

in 1964

• Comet 4 entered service in

1958, with 30 year service life

4

Source: www.extremetech.com

Comet 1

2016-04-28

Conceptual Design Studies

5

Source: wikipedia commons

2016-04-28

6

Source: Gunston ‘Commercial Aircraft’

Comet Nacelle Cutaway

2016-04-28

Engines Embedded in Wing Root

7

• V-bomber triad – Vulcan, Valiant, Victor

• First generation of strategic jet bombers

• Contemporaneous with B-47

• British obsession with minimizing wetted area at

expense of everything else

Source:www.telegraph.co.uk Source: en.wikpedia.org

2016-04-28

© Nathan Daws Source: airliners.net

B-47

8

Source: www.aviation-history.com

2016-04-28

Uncontained Engine Failure

92016-04-28

Uncontained Engine Failure

102016-04-28

Source: www.catia.net

Comet Accident Investigation

• Fatigue failure of

frame of escape

hatch

11

Source: www.greatwen.com

2016-04-28

12

Source: www.fugahumana.com

Comet Accident Investigation

2016-04-28

Comet Lessons Learned

• Do as many trade

studies as time and

money permit

• Include the “-ilities”

– Supportability

– Reliability

– Maintainability

– Vulnerability

13

• Design for derivatives

– Payload

– Range

– Propulsion system

• Be prepared for

“unknown unknowns”

2016-04-28

2: Lockheed L-188 Electra

• First flight Dec 1957

• First US commercial

turboprop

• Up to 80 pax / 1,913 nmi.

• Wing root fatigue failure in

Sept 1959 and March 1960

due to loosened engine

mounts

• Public lost faith

• Production ended in 1961 at

170 aircraft

14

Source: commons.Wikimedia.org

2016-04-28

Electra Preceded by Vickers Viscount

• First flight 1948

• Entered service 1950

• 4 X R-R Dart turboprops

• Up to 75 pax / 1200 nmi.

• Total production of 445

15

Source: commons.Wikimedia.org

2016-04-28

1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

De Havilland Trident

Boeing 727

Vickers Vanguard

Lockheed Electra

Vickers Viscount

Service Period and Production Quantity

16

Data source: Wikipedia

2016-04-28

1,832

170

44

445

179

Electra Eventually Replaced by B.727

• Up to 189 pax

• Design development

~1960

• First flight Feb 1963

• Entered service Feb 1964

• Production ended in 1984

with 1,832 aircraft built

172016-04-28

Source: theairlines.net

Success as P-3 ASW

• Total of 734 built

• Eventually to be replaced

by Boeing P-8A (IOC in

late 2013)

18

Source: US Navy

2016-04-28

Model 188 Lessons Learned

• Meet customers’ expectations (they wanted jet

comfort and low vibration levels)

• Too late for a large turboprop (at first flight,

Viscount had been operational for 7 years)

• Be lucky, your design may just have other

applications

192016-04-28

3: Convair 880/990• First flight Jan 1959

• Belated attempt to enter

four-engine transport

market (B.367-80 first flight

in July 1954)

• Five abreast seating

– CV 880 110 pax / 2,943 nmi.

– CV 990 149 pax / 3,124 nmi.

• Mcruise = 0.91 (CV990)

• Production

– CV 880 65

– CV 990 39

20

Source: commons.wikmedia.com

Convair CV 990

2016-04-28

Application of Kücheman

Carrots

2016-04-28 21

Source: aviation.stackexchange.com

Strong shock on upper surface Shock reduced

GE CJ805-23 Turbofan

22

Source: www.military.ir

• Fan stage at rear of engine

2016-04-28

Convair 880/990 Competition

• Boeing 720

– first flight Nov 1959

– 149 pax (one class)

– Range 3,680 nmi.

• Boeing 727-100

– First flight Feb 1963

– 149 pax (one class)

• Boeing 727-200

– 189 pax (one class)

23

Source: commons.wikmedia.com

2016-04-28

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

Vickers VC10

Convair 880/990

Douglas DC-8

Boeing 707

Service Period and Production Quantity

24

Data source: Wikipedia

2016-04-28

556

104

1010

54

Convair 880/990 Lessons

Learned

• Too late to the party

• Difficult to find niche on payload-range plot that

can’t be filled by derivative of another aircraft type

• GE805 had higher SFC than PWC JT-3C on 707

• Higher cruise Mach didn’t result in significant

reduction in operating cost

252016-04-28

4: De Havilland DH 121 Trident

26

Source: century-of-flight.net

• First flight Jan 1962

• Designed to 1957 BEA

requirement for 88 pax

• 3 R-R Speys

• Trident 1: 101 pax

• Range: 1,170 nmi.

• Entered service March 1964

• Production ended in 1979

with 179 aircraft

2016-04-28

Trident 3B

UK Government and Flag Carriers

272016-04-28

Trident Handicaps

• UK government insisted on merger with losing competitor

(to form Hawker Siddeley)

• Too small for worldwide market

• Shared design details with Boeing

• Long flight test cycle (two years vs. one for Boeing)

• Low production rate (12/year vs. 80-100 for Boeing)

• Limited growth potential (couldn’t re-engine)

282016-04-28

Trident 3B had 3½ Engines

29

Source: www.airliners.net

• 3 R-R Speys

Fn = 3 x 11,960 lb.

• 1 RB.162 Fn = 5,250 lb

– Designed as lightweight

lift jet

– Added 15% takeoff thrust

with 5% increase in

TOGW

2016-04-28

© Paul Markman

Trident Lessons Learned

• Don’t allow launch customer to dictate specs

• Don’t show design details to a competitor

• Commit manpower and facilities for quick entry

into service and adequate production rate

• Design for growth in MTOGW

302016-04-28

5: Vickers VC10

31

Source: wikimedia

• First flight June 1962

• Designed to BOAC

requirement ‘hot and high’

airfields on Empire routes

• 4 R-R Conways

• Entered service April 1964

• Production ended in 1979

with only 54 aircraft

manufactured (inc. Super)

2016-04-28

VC10 Characteristics

• Clean wing (Vapp approx. 10 kt less than 707)

• Low cabin noise

• BOAC calculated DOC/pax mile ~3% higher than for

707 (and made this public)

322016-04-28

VC10 707-320

TOFL [ft] 8,280 ~10,800

LFL [ft] 6,380 ~7,500

Field Performance

Source: airliners.net Source: Boeing Performance Manual

Wing Root Bending Relief

• Engines mounted on

wing reduce wing root

bending

332016-04-28

Boeing 737

Fuselage And Wing Root Bending

• Additional wing

and fuselage

bending

• Cabin not centered

over wing

• Made worse by

– Stretched fuselage

– Higher BPR

(heavier) engines

342016-04-28

McDonnell Douglas MD-80

Larger C.g. Travel

35

Douglas DC-9-20

• C.g. moves

forward as

aircraft is

loaded

• Problem made

worse with

heavier

engines

2016-04-28

Source: Schaufele

More Difficult to Control C.G. Location

• C.g. location is aft at OEW and forward at MTOGW

2016-04-28 36

More Difficult to Control C.G. Location

• When defueling, remove fuel from fin tank first

2016-04-28 37

RAF Brize Norton, Dec. 1997

© Crown Copyright

© Crown Copyright

VC10 Handicaps

• We/Wto = 0.47 compared with 0.44 for B707-320

• Higher cruise drag than predicted due to nacelle/pylon

geometry

• Runways lengthened to accommodate 707/DC8

382016-04-28

• Geometry modified to

maintain (or increase)

isobar sweep at wingtip

392016-04-28

Added Küchemann Wingtips

Source: Küchemann, Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft

Source: http://www.airliners.net/aviation-

forums/general_aviation/print.main?id=6249338

DH Trident 2E modIsobar comparison

VC10 Nacelle and Pylon Mods.

• Extended fairing between engine nacelles

• Extended pylon trailing edge

• Moved nacelles outboard

• Eliminated inboard thrust reversers

402016-04-28

Before After

VC10 Uncontained Failure

41

http://www.vc10.net/History/incidents_and_accidents.html#Engine Disintegrates

• Departed LHR, Nov 1969

• LP turbine blades shed from

No. 3 engine

• Penetrated No. 4 engine

which caught fire (quickly

extinguished)

• Returned to LHR 90K lb over

max landing weight

• Blew fusible plugs

2016-04-28

VC10 Lessons Learned

• Don’t allow launch customer to dictate specs

• Don’t allow a penalty in payload-range unless

commensurate benefit is justified

• Take account of potential changes in the operating

environment

422016-04-28

6: BAC/Aerospatiale Concorde

43

Source: commons.Wikimedia.org

• First flight March 1969

• UK-French government joint

development agreement in

Nov 1962

• 90-120 pax

• Range 3,900 nmi.

• Cruise Mach 2.02

• 4 X B-S Olympus Mk 593

• Production ended at 20 a/c

2016-04-28

Concorde Handicaps

• Development cost 6X original estimate

• Flown supersonically only over water

• 1973 oil shortage deterred buyers

• 15.8 pax miles/gal, compared with B707 33.3 pax

mpg, B747 46.4 pax mpg, DC-10 53.6 pax mpg

• Banned from operation at some airport because of

perceived noise

• In July 2000, AF Concorde crashed at CDG due to

fuel leak/engine fire

• Withdrawn from service 2003

442016-04-28

Concorde Accident at CDG

• In July 2000, AF Concorde crashed at CDG due to

fuel leak/engine fire

45

Source: en.wikipedia.org

2016-04-28

More Concorde Handicaps

• Government to government contract prevented

unilateral withdrawal

• Development costs not adequately controlled

• Profitable operation doubtful, even before 1973 oil

crisis

462016-04-28

Concorde Lessons Learned

• Manufacturers must take responsibility for

success or failure

• There is a big difference between

technological possibility and economic viability

• Safety is paramount

• Pioneers may get all the glory, but they rarely

make all the money

472016-04-28

7: Lockheed L-1011 Tristar

48

Flight test aircraft at Palmdale

• Designed to AA requirement

for ORD-LAX, LGA-ORD

• Capable of operation from

LGA (7000 ft)

• 3 X R-R RB.211

• New production facilities at

Palmdale, CA

• First flight Nov 1970

• Production ended in 1985

with 250 aircraft

2016-04-28

Source: www.airlinereporter.com

L-1011 Direct Lift Control

2016-04-28 49

Source: © DIASpotter

With landing flaps

deployed, spoilers linked

to control column for direct

control of rate of descent

L1011 Direct Lift Control

2016-04-28 50

Source: www.flightaware.comr

Direct control of rate of

descent without changing

pitch attitude

L-1011 Maneuver Load

Control/Gust Alleviation

2016-04-28 51

Source: Lockheed

Deflect ailerons t.e.

up to reduce wing

root BM during

maneuver or gust

Overall lift

unchanged

e is reduced

Enables higher wing span (and reduced drag) for

same maximum wing root bending moment

L-1011 All-moving Horizontal Tail

2016-04-28 52

Source: Green & Swanorough, Commercial Aircraft

Triple-redundant

horizontal tail

hydraulic actuators

Typical T/W vs. W/S plot

2016-04-28 53

Triple-redundant

horizontal tail

hydraulic actuators

Typical T/W vs. W/S plot

2016-04-28 54

L-1011-1

124 lb/ft2DC-10-10

118 lb/ft2

L-1011 Handicaps

• Almost identical mission requirement to DC-10

– Fierce competition for sales

– Offered too cheaply

• Bankruptcy of Rolls-Royce during development

• Uneven production required training new labor

• Production facilities too far from source of labor

552016-04-28

History behind Rolls-Royce Downfall

56

CX-LHS Program (1963)

Boeing CX-LHSDouglas CX-LHS

Lockheed C-5AGE TF-39 P&W JT-9D

GE CF-6

Boeing 747-100 Douglas DC-10 Lockheed L-1011 Airbus A300(UK-France MOU signed 1967)

2016-04-28

Difficult to Recruit Labor

57

Source: Google Maps

2016-04-28

Lockheed Plant 10

58

http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/vaisseaux-falcon-sls-dragon-orion2.htm

2016-04-28

Theoretical Scissors Plot

59

• Development cost ~$5 B

• Aimed for breakeven at

250 aircraft

2016-04-28

Actual Scissors Plot

60

• Early sale price

reduced to build market

share

• 50 aircraft sold to Air

Holdings Ltd

• When production

picked up, new

employees had to be

trained

2016-04-28

L-1011 Lessons Learned

• Don’t go head to head with an identical

product

• Design for different engine options

• Design for growth in MTOGW

• Build airplane near skilled labor pool

612016-04-28

8: Dassault Mercure

62

Source: wikimedia

• First Dassault airliner

• First flight May 1971

• Designed for 120 – 162 pax

• Stage lengths up to 1100

nmi.

• 2 X JT-8D

• Entered service June 1974

• Production ended in 1979 at

54 aircraft (inc. Super)

2016-04-28

Dassault Mercure Handicaps

63

Source: wikimedia

• Dassault not a recognized

commercial a/c manufacturer

• No significant performance

improvement over B737

• DC-9-50 matched payload-

range of Mercure 100

• We/Wto = 0.57 compared with

0.52 for B737-200

2016-04-28

Mercure Lessons Learned

• Difficult for an unknown commercial

aircraft manufacturer to break into an

established market

• Derivative designs can fill market holes

more cheaply than new designs

642016-04-28

9: VFW-Fokker 614

65

Source: commons.Wikimedia.org

• First flight July 1971

• DC-3 replacement

• 40 – 44 pax

• Range with 40 pax = 645 nmi.

• 2 X R-R/Snecma M45H

turbofans

• Production ended in Dec 1977

with 16 airplanes

• Last flight Dec 2012

2016-04-28

VFW 614 Field Performance

66

Source: http://www.vfw614.de/die_vfw_614_e.html

• Better field performance than DC-3

• Not true STOL (2000 ft TOFL)

2016-04-28

Engines Mounted on Top of Wing

• Advantages

– Wing root bending relief

– Short landing gear and airstairs

– Protection from FOD

– Fan noise reduction on ground

• Disadvantages

– Reduced length of t.e. for flaps

– Inlet in high-speed flow

2016-04-28 67

HondaJet

Hybrid Wing Body

• Lockheed Martin studies

started in 2009

• Carries outsized cargo

lifted by C-5

• Burns 70% less fuel than

C-17

• Over-wing nacelles permit

very-high-BPR engines

2016-04-28 68

VFW-Fokker 614

source: aviationweek.com

Operating Cost Comparison

69

Seats: Wikipedia

DOC: https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1968/1968%20-%200119.PDF

2016-04-28

2

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

DO

C/s

ea

t m

ile

Maximum seats

Trends in DOC/seat mile vs. Capacity

VFW-614

FH-228

HS.748

F.28

DC-9-10

VFW 614 Handicaps

• DC-3 was cheap and ubiquitous

• VFW 614 had higher price, higher fuel burn

• Rolls-Royce bankruptcy in Feb 1971

• Lost test a/c due to elevator flutter in Feb 1972

• VFW not known as commercial aircraft manufacturer

• Rolls-Royce (Bristol Siddeley) M45H was a new engine

702016-04-28

VFW 614 Lessons Learned

• Very difficult to design viable aircraft at bottom

end of market that meets FAR 25 (i.e., > 20 pax,

or > 12,500 lb TOGW)

• Keep to design goals (including costs)

• Try not to introduce new airframe from unknown

manufacturer with new engine

• Don’t build a Mercedes Benz when a VW is

wanted

712016-04-28

Conclusions

• Be prepared for

“unknown unknowns”

• Do impartial trade studies

• Ensure performance

capabilities will be

utilized

• Don’t compete with an

identical product

• Design for derivatives

• Don’t compete where an

existing product is well

established unless your

product is demonstrably

superior

• Ensure technology is

proven

• Safety is paramount

• Be lucky

722016-04-28

The EndThanks for your interest

2016-04-28


Recommended